<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : News Articles for S.1547 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s1547/atom_news" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s1547/news" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2007-07-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/news/44330</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Carl Levin: Opening Senate Floor Remarks on the National Defense ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/48726935_carl_levin_carl_levin_opening_senate_floor_remarks_national_defense_authorization_act_fisca" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-11:/commentary/861518</id>
    <updated>2007-07-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>All American Patriots (press release),&amp;nbsp;Sweden</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, which was not available when the report on that bill, S. 1547, was filed, be printed in the Record.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/48726935_carl_levin_carl_levin_opening_senate_floor_remarks_national_defense_authorization_act_fisca&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Carl Levin: Senate Floor Statement on the National Defense ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/48726936_carl_levin_carl_levin_senate_floor_statement_national_defense_authorization_act_fiscal_year" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-11:/commentary/844463</id>
    <updated>2007-07-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>All American Patriots (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I am pleased that our bill, S. 1547, was reported to the Senate on a unanimous 25-to-nothing vote of our committee. Additionally, S. 1606, the Dignified ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/48726936_carl_levin_carl_levin_senate_floor_statement_national_defense_authorization_act_fiscal_year&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Analysis of Senate Armed Services Committee Action On The Fy 2008</title>
    <link href="http://newsblaze.com/story/20070710100122tsop.nb/newsblaze/TOPSTORY/Top-Stories.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-09:/commentary/802154</id>
    <updated>2007-07-09T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NewsBlaze,&amp;nbsp;CA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Chris Hellman and Travis Sharp The Senate Armed Services Committee completed its markup of S. 1547, the FY2008 Defense Authorization bill, on May 25, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newsblaze.com/story/20070710100122tsop.nb/newsblaze/TOPSTORY/Top-Stories.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Waxman not melting away</title>
    <link href="http://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2007/06/waxman-not-melt.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-26:/commentary/770767</id>
    <updated>2007-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Project on Government Oversight,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Many of Waxman's findings are the subject of numerous bi-partisan legislative proposals (HR 1585 and S. 1547) that would improve the federal contracting ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2007/06/waxman-not-melt.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pork reform: Stick a fork in it</title>
    <link href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0607/4666.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-25:/commentary/767975</id>
    <updated>2007-06-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Politico,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
When the Senate Armed Services Committee reported out its different version of the bill, S. 1547, it listed 309 earmarks costing $5.6 billion. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0607/4666.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1547 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008</title>
    <link href="http://www.epicos.com/epicos/portal/media-type/html/user/anon/page/default.psml;.tomcat1?action=portlets.ArticleAction&amp;amp;amp;articleId=79380&amp;amp;amp;categoryEntity=News&amp;amp;amp;eventSubmit_doTraverse=" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-25:/commentary/767830</id>
    <updated>2007-06-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Epicos.com (press release),&amp;nbsp;Switzerland</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1547 would authorize appropriations totaling $629 billion for fiscal year 2008 for the military functions of the Department of Defense (DoD), ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.epicos.com/epicos/portal/media-type/html/user/anon/page/default.psml;.tomcat1?action=portlets.ArticleAction&amp;amp;amp;articleId=79380&amp;amp;amp;categoryEntity=News&amp;amp;amp;eventSubmit_doTraverse=&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Infotech &amp;amp; the law | Legal insights for today's market</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtontechnology.com/print/22_11/30930-1.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-24:/commentary/767831</id>
    <updated>2007-06-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Washington Technology,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... enjoy the broadest support, and there is conceptual support within the Senate Armed Services Committee (see S. 1547) for several of the House reforms. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtontechnology.com/print/22_11/30930-1.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate delays debate on defense budget</title>
    <link href="http://www.navytimes.com/news/2007/06/military_defensebudget_070619w/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-18:/commentary/767832</id>
    <updated>2007-06-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NavyTimes.com,&amp;nbsp;VA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... catch up so that a conference committee can be appointed to work out differences. The Senate Armed Services Committee passed its bill, S 1547, on June 13.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.navytimes.com/news/2007/06/military_defensebudget_070619w/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate delays debate on defense budget</title>
    <link href="http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2007/06/military_defensebudget_070619w/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-18:/commentary/755040</id>
    <updated>2007-06-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>AirForceTimes.com,&amp;nbsp;VA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... catch up so that a conference committee can be appointed to work out differences. The Senate Armed Services Committee passed its bill, S 1547, on June 13.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2007/06/military_defensebudget_070619w/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Keep Missile Defense on Track in the Senate</title>
    <link href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/wm1511.cfm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-17:/commentary/755041</id>
    <updated>2007-06-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Heritage.org,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
by Baker Spring The Senate Armed Services Committee's version of the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2008 (S. 1547) contains two ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/wm1511.cfm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>US Troop Levels Trouble Senate Panel</title>
    <link href="http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=2834356&amp;amp;amp;C=america" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-17:/commentary/755039</id>
    <updated>2007-06-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DefenseNews.com (subscription)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The bill, S 1547, approves increases of 20000 soldiers and 4000 Marines in 2008. Both increases appear larger than the Bush administration requested because ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=2834356&amp;amp;amp;C=america&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Democrats Ready to Renew Battle on War Policy Via Defense Bill</title>
    <link href="http://public.cq.com/docs/cqt/news110-000002530202.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-12:/commentary/755042</id>
    <updated>2007-06-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Congressional Quarterly,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Bush still is likely to veto a bill &amp;#8212; probably the fiscal 2008 defense authorization ( S 1547 ) &amp;#8212; that carries one or more of the four provisions. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://public.cq.com/docs/cqt/news110-000002530202.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

