U.S. Congress - S.1640 Vessel Hull Design Protection Amendments of 2007
S.1640 - Vessel Hull Design Protection Amendments of 2007
A bill to amend chapter 13 of title 17, United States Code (relating to the vessel hull design protection), to clarify the definitions of a hull and a deck. view all titles (4)
All Bill Titles
- Official: A bill to amend chapter 13 of title 17, United States Code (relating to the vessel hull design protection), to clarify the definitions of a hull and a deck. as introduced.
- Short: Vessel Hull Design Protection Amendments of 2007 as passed senate.
- Short: Vessel Hull Design Protection Amendments of 2007 as reported to senate.
- Short: Vessel Hull Design Protection Amendments of 2007 as introduced.
This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.
Bill's Views
- Today: 0
- Past Seven Days: 10
- All-Time: 2,661
0%
Users Support Bill
0 in favor / 1 opposed
Write Your
Senators
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
Sort By
Comments Feed ?
What's this?
OpenCongress comment boards are an open forum for discussion. Let's build public knowledge about Congress together, so please keep the discussion civil -- no harsh language, subject to our community Comment Policy. Do not post any information here (for example, your name or email) that you do not wish to be public.
Filter Comments to a Rating of at least
What's this?
The Ratings Filter allows you to determine how many user comments to view on pages here on OpenCongress. Setting the filter higher (towards 10) allows you to see only the comments rated "most helpful" by users, while setting the filter lower (towards 0) allows you to see more comments on a page.
These designs serve a specific purpose and have a utilitarian value, and the more advanced they are, the more they must relate to the nature of sailing. This is clearly outside the scope of copyright law (USC 17 Sec 102). If these METHODS or IDEAS for making a good ship are truly worth protecting they should have to pass the scrutiny of Patent review, exactly as the law intended for inventors. Can anyone explain to me why this needs 'life + 70' years protection versus 17 years?
The best article I have ever read on uncopyrightable works, and an explanation. The way I see it (or at least would like to) is "If it could be patented, then it CAN'T be copyrighted".
http://www.bitlaw.com/copyright/unprotected.html