<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for S.1730 Pathways to Independence Act of 2007</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s1730/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s1730/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-10-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/44990</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Das Bundesverfassungsgericht</title>
    <link href="http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/rs20081014_1bvr231006.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-30:/commentary/3407041</id>
    <updated>2008-10-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bundesverfassungsgericht Newsfeed </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Oktober 2003 - III ZR 420/02 -, VersR 2005, S. 1730; Seer, in: Tipke/Kruse, Abgabenordnung - Finanzgerichtsordnung, Loseblatt, Stand: Mai 2008, &#194;&#167; 89 Rn. 3 f. zu &#194;&#167; 89 Abs. 1 Satz 1 AO). Hinsichtlich &#194;&#167; 89 Abs. 2 Satz 1 AO kommt hinzu, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/rs20081014_1bvr231006.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Townhall.com::Blog</title>
    <link href="http://townhall.com/blog/g/175c5aa6-a8ac-486e-9739-dadddfe90a2b" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-13:/commentary/3407039</id>
    <updated>2008-08-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Townhall.com Blog's TownHall Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... H.R. 8, CQ Vote #149: Motion Rejected 44-54: R 4-43; D 39-11; I 1-0, 6/12/02, McCain Voted Yea; H.R. 8, Senate Vote #151, Motion Rejected: 54-44, McCain Voted Nay, 6/12/02; S. 1730, Senate Vote 28, Amendment Agreed To: 56-42, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://townhall.com/blog/g/175c5aa6-a8ac-486e-9739-dadddfe90a2b&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Specific Problems With the Freedom of Information Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.wiemy.notak.info/?p=100" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-23:/commentary/2477712</id>
    <updated>2008-06-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Wiemy wi&#281;cej, bo czytamy... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Although the Monsanto matter arose after the Judiciary Committee reported out S. 1730, it shows the wisdom of the bill&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s provisions requiring government agencies to notify businesses in advance whenever the agency intends to publicly ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wiemy.notak.info/?p=100&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Specific Problems With the Freedom of Information Act</title>
    <link href="http://cyber-criminal.legal-questions.org/2008/05/30/specific-problems-with-the-freedom-of-information-act/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-30:/commentary/2277240</id>
    <updated>2008-05-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Cyber Criminal </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Although the Monsanto matter arose after the Judiciary Committee reported out S. 1730, it shows the wisdom of the bill&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s provisions requiring government agencies to notify businesses in advance whenever the agency intends to publicly ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyber-criminal.legal-questions.org/2008/05/30/specific-problems-with-the-freedom-of-information-act/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rudy endorses fiscal liberal, John McCain. &#194;&#171; One Mom</title>
    <link href="http://onemom.wordpress.com/2008/02/02/rudy-endorses-fiscal-liberal-john-mccain/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-01:/commentary/3486983</id>
    <updated>2008-02-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>One Mom </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Motion Rejected 44-54: R 4-43; D 39-11; I 1-0, 6/12/02, McCain Voted Yea; H.R. 8, Senate Vote #151, Motion Rejected: 54-44, McCain Voted Nay, 6/12/02; S. 1730, Senate Vote 28, Amendment Agreed To: 56-42, McCain Voted Nay, 2/13/02) ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://onemom.wordpress.com/2008/02/02/rudy-endorses-fiscal-liberal-john-mccain/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Townhall.com::Blog</title>
    <link href="http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/175c5aa6-a8ac-486e-9739-dadddfe90a2b" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-26:/commentary/3713733</id>
    <updated>2008-01-26T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Hugh Hewitt's TownHall Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Motion Rejected 44-54: R 4-43; D 39-11; I 1-0, 6/12/02, McCain Voted Yea; H.R. 8, Senate Vote #151, Motion Rejected: 54-44, McCain Voted Nay, 6/12/02; S. 1730, Senate Vote 28, Amendment Agreed To: 56-42, McCain Voted Nay, 2/13/02) ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/175c5aa6-a8ac-486e-9739-dadddfe90a2b&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rudy Unloads on John McCain - Definitely NOT a Fiscal Conservative ...</title>
    <link href="http://killbuckcreekpolitics.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/rudy-unloads-on-john-mccain-definitely-not-a-fiscal-conservative/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-23:/commentary/3407043</id>
    <updated>2008-01-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Killbuck Creek Politics </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Motion Rejected 44-54: R 4-43; D 39-11; I 1-0, 6/12/02, McCain Voted Yea; H.R. 8, Senate Vote #151, Motion Rejected: 54-44, McCain Voted Nay, 6/12/02; S. 1730, Senate Vote 28, Amendment Agreed To: 56-42, McCain Voted Nay, 2/13/02) ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://killbuckcreekpolitics.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/rudy-unloads-on-john-mccain-definitely-not-a-fiscal-conservative/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WashingtonWatch.com - S. 1730, The Pathways to Independence Act of ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/200506396.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-30:/commentary/3407037</id>
    <updated>2007-06-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for HR 6562,... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
US Congress: S. 1730, The Pathways to Independence Act of 2007.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/200506396.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Action: Introduced: S. 1730: A bill to amend part A of title ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-1730" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-27:/commentary/2994061</id>
    <updated>2007-06-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>GovTrack.us Monitored Events </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Gordon Smith [R-OR] introduced S. 1730: A bill to amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act, to reward States for engaging individuals with disabilities in work activities, and for other purposes. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-1730&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1730, A bill to amend part A of title IV of the Social Security ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_1730.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-27:/commentary/801528</id>
    <updated>2007-06-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>washingtonwatch.com - Welcome to washingtonwatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1730 would amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act, and it would reward States for engaging individuals with disabilities in work activities....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_1730.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
