<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : News Articles for S.1782 Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s1782/atom_news" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s1782/news" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-04-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/news/45212</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Arbitration Fairness Act Protects Americans From Abusive Corporate ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;amp;STORY=/www/story/04-02-2008/0004785177&amp;amp;EDATE=" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-02:/commentary/2136036</id>
    <updated>2008-04-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PR Newswire (press release),&amp;nbsp;NY</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... of 2007 (HR 3010 / S.1782) and US Chamber&amp;#39;s latest attempts to avoid corporate accountability while denying people justice through the legal system: &amp;quot;US ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/04-02-2008/0004785177&amp;EDATE="&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress May End Mandatory Arbitration for Consumers</title>
    <link href="http://roanoke.injuryboard.com/consumer-issues/congress-may-end-mandatory-arbitration-for-consumers.php?googleid=14918" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-12:/commentary/1608155</id>
    <updated>2008-02-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>InjuryBoard.com,&amp;nbsp;FL</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Please write your representative in Congress and ask them to support the Arbitration Fairness Act (HR 3010 and S. 1782). Let's win one for the American ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://roanoke.injuryboard.com/consumer-issues/congress-may-end-mandatory-arbitration-for-consumers.php?googleid=14918"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Liveblogging The Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing On The ...</title>
    <link href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/news-from-the-swamp/liveblogging-the-senate-judiciary-subcommittee-hearing-on-the-arbitration-fairness-act-332861.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-12:/commentary/1384893</id>
    <updated>2007-12-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Consumerist,&amp;nbsp;NY</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution will be considering S. 1782, an Act to banish mandatory binding arbitration from consumer disputes. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/news-from-the-swamp/liveblogging-the-senate-judiciary-subcommittee-hearing-on-the-arbitration-fairness-act-332861.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Mandatory Arbitration Stacks Deck Against Credit Cardholders, Data ...</title>
    <link href="http://foodconsumer.org/7777/8888/Non-f_ood_Things_27/120202282007_Mandatory_Arbitration_Stacks_Deck_Against_Credit_Cardholders_Data_Show.shtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-02:/commentary/1384895</id>
    <updated>2007-12-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Food Consumer,&amp;nbsp;IL</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
has introduced the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007 (S. 1782 and HR 3010). &amp;#8220;It&amp;#8217;s time to restore choice to consumers and employees, and restore the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://foodconsumer.org/7777/8888/Non-f_ood_Things_27/120202282007_Mandatory_Arbitration_Stacks_Deck_Against_Credit_Cardholders_Data_Show.shtml"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
