The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowS.1957 - Design Piracy Prohibition Act
A bill to amend title 17, United States Code, to provide protection for fashion design.

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
S 1957 ISCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide protection for fashion design.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
August 2, 2007
Mr. SCHUMER (for himself, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. HATCH, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. KOHL, Mrs. CLINTON, and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the JudiciaryCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide protection for fashion design.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Design Piracy Prohibition Act'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 2. PROTECTION FOR FASHION DESIGN.
(a) Designs Protected-
(1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(3) FASHION DESIGN- A fashion design is subject to protection under this chapter.'; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in subsection (b)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) in paragraph (2), by inserting `or an article of apparel,' after `plug or mold,'; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) by adding at the end the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(7) A `fashion design' is the appearance as a whole of an article of apparel, including its ornamentation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(8) The term `design' includes fashion design, except to the extent expressly limited to the design of a vessel.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(9) The term `apparel' means--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(A) an article of men's, women's, or children's clothing, including undergarments, outerwear, gloves, footwear, and headgear;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(B) handbags, purses, and tote bags;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(C) belts; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(D) eyeglass frames.'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Designs Not Subject to Protection-
(1) by striking `(5)' and inserting `(5)(A) in the case of a design of a vessel hull,';CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) by striking the period and inserting `; or'; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) by adding at the end the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(B) in the case of a fashion design, embodied in a useful article that was made public by the designer or owner in the United States or a foreign country more than 3 months before the date of the application for registration under this chapter.'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Term of Protection-
`(a) In General- Subject to subsection (b), the protection provided under this chapter--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(1) for a design of a vessel hull shall continue for a term of 10 years beginning on the date of the commencement of protection under section 1304; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(2) for a fashion design shall continue for a term of 3 years beginning on the date of the commencement of protection under section 1304.'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Infringement-
(1) in subsection (c), by striking `that a design was protected' and inserting `or reasonable grounds to know that protection for the design is claimed';CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in subsection (e)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) in the first sentence, by inserting `or from an image thereof,' after `copied from a design protected under this chapter,';CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) in the third sentence, by striking `A design' and inserting `In the case of a design of a vessel hull, a design'; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) by adding after the third sentence the following: `In the case of a fashion design, a design shall not be deemed to have been copied from a protected design if it is original and not closely and substantially similar in overall visual appearance to a protected design.'; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) by adding at the end the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(h) Secondary Liability- The doctrines of secondary infringement and secondary liability that are applied in actions under chapter 5 of this title apply to the same extent to actions under this chapter. Any person who is liable under either such doctrine under this chapter is subject to all the remedies provided under this chapter, including those attributable to any underlying or resulting infringement.'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(e) Application for Registration-
(1) in subsection (a), by striking the first sentence and inserting the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(1) VESSEL HULL DESIGN- In the case of a design of a vessel hull, protection under this chapter shall be lost if application for registration of the design is not made within 2 years after the date on which the design is first made public.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(2) FASHION DESIGN- In the case of a fashion design, protection under this chapter shall be lost if application for registration of the design is not made within 3 months after the date on which the design is first made public.'; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in subsection (b), by striking `for sale' and inserting `for individual or public sale'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(f) Examination of Application and Issue or Refusal of Registration-
(g) Recovery for Infringement-
(h) Other Rights Not Affected-
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking `or' after the semicolon;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period and inserting `; or'; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) by adding at the end the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(3) any rights that may exist under provisions of this title other than this chapter.'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
Top-Rated Comments
- “Is there any reason why this can't be an extension of patent law? It is ...” adelie
- “I am highly for the protection but against this particular bill. There i...” designerella
Recent OC Blog Articles
- Anti-Web Censorship Bill Protest from Our Perspective at OC Feb 08, 2012
- Senate Passes FAA Bill With Anti-Union Language Feb 07, 2012
- House Getting Creative With the Earmark Moratorium Feb 06, 2012
- Liberate OpenGovData Now Feb 01, 2012
- Senate debates STOCK Act, dodges real issue of money in politics Feb 01, 2012

U.S. Congress - Text of S.1957 as Introduced in Senate Design Piracy Prohibition Act



