<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for S.2088 NSL Reform Act of 2007</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s2088/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s2088/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-06-19T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/46361</id>
  <entry>
    <title>REWRITING SOME PATRIOT ACT STUPIDITY</title>
    <link href="http://www.jimhightower.com/node/6516" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-19:/commentary/2348114</id>
    <updated>2008-06-19T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Jim Hightower&amp;#39;s Common-Sense Commentaries </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Now Feingold is back with S. 2088, a bill to rein in the FBI and restore the people&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Constitutional rights. As he puts it, we&#226;&#8364;&#8482;ve learned the hard way that &#226;&#8364;&#339;trust us&#226;&#8364;&#157; doesn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t cut it when it comes to preventing government snoops fro&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.jimhightower.com/node/6516"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CDT Policy Post on Network Management CDT issued a policy post ...</title>
    <link href="http://privacy-live.blogspot.com/2008/06/cdt-policy-post-on-network-management.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-05:/commentary/2307341</id>
    <updated>2008-06-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>privacy </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CDT and other organizations issued a letter endorsing the NSL Reform Act, S. 2088, which would place more restrictions on how NSLs are issued and subject them to judicial oversight. CDT Testimony: DHS, State Using Insecure RFID ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://privacy-live.blogspot.com/2008/06/cdt-policy-post-on-network-management.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>EFF.org:FBI Withdraws Unconstitutional National Security Letter ...</title>
    <link href="http://codehound.goldsteinmedia.com/2008/05/28/efforgfbi-withdraws-unconstitutional-national-security-letter-after-aclu-and-eff-challenge/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-28:/commentary/2417925</id>
    <updated>2008-05-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>--CodeHound @ SethGoldstein.net -- </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Russell Feingold (D-WI) introduced a Senate bill of the same name (S. 2088). Both bills are aimed at narrowing the statute by enacting limits on when and how NSLs can be used and bringing the gag order provision in line with the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://codehound.goldsteinmedia.com/2008/05/28/efforgfbi-withdraws-unconstitutional-national-security-letter-after-aclu-and-eff-challenge/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>One Dead iMac, One Happy Apple Customer My almost-new 24-inch iMac ...</title>
    <link href="http://privacy-live.blogspot.com/2008/05/one-dead-imac-one-happy-apple-customer.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-17:/commentary/2318151</id>
    <updated>2008-05-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>privacy </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CDT and other organizations issued a letter endorsing the NSL Reform Act, S. 2088, which would place more restrictions on how NSLs are issued and subject them to judicial oversight. Health Data Systems Need A Comprehensive Privacy and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://privacy-live.blogspot.com/2008/05/one-dead-imac-one-happy-apple-customer.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FBI Withdraws Unconstitutional National Security Letter After ACLU ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=18680" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-09:/commentary/2408911</id>
    <updated>2008-05-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Privacy / Rights Project </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Russell Feingold (D-WI) introduced a Senate bill of the same name (S. 2088). Both bills are aimed at narrowing the statute by enacting limits on when and how NSLs can be used and bringing the gag order provision in line with the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=18680"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&#226;&#8364;&#732;russell feingold&#226;&#8364;&#8482; on the web</title>
    <link href="http://russellfeingold.bootcamps.com/2008/05/08/russell-feingold-on-the-web-3/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-08:/commentary/2188886</id>
    <updated>2008-05-08T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>From me to you about Russell Feingolds </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Representative Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) has introduced HR 3189, the &#226;&#8364;&#339;National Security Letters Reform Act of 2007,&#226;&#8364;&#157; and Senator Russell Feingold (D-WI) introduced a Senate bill of the same name (S. 2088). Both bills are aimed at narrowing ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://russellfeingold.bootcamps.com/2008/05/08/russell-feingold-on-the-web-3/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>National Security Letters Reform Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.downsizedc.org/blog/2008/apr/26/national_security_letters_reform_act" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-26:/commentary/2115374</id>
    <updated>2008-04-26T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DownsizeDC.org Blog - . . . for Human Progress... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
DownsizeDC.org has joined 28 other organizations in sending the House and Senate a message asking them to support S. 2088, the National Security Letters Reform Act. Here is the copy of the letter sent to the Senate:. April 22, 2008 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.downsizedc.org/blog/2008/apr/26/national_security_letters_reform_act"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>National Security Letters Reform Act</title>
    <link href="http://look-at-videos.com/video-blog/national-security-letters-reform-act/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-26:/commentary/2115375</id>
    <updated>2008-04-26T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Video Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
National Security Letters Reform Act DownsizeDC.org has joined 28 other organizations in sending the House and Senate a message asking them to support S. 2088, the National Security Letters Reform Act. Here is the copy of the letter ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://look-at-videos.com/video-blog/national-security-letters-reform-act/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Will the Senate Rein in the NSL Authority?</title>
    <link href="http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=5332" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-23:/commentary/2100765</id>
    <updated>2008-04-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Open Left - Front Page </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The bipartisan NSL Reform Act of 2007, S. 2088, is one such fix. The bill requires that NSLs be issued only to collect information about terrorists and spies, their associates and their activities. It also fixes the unconstitutional gag ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=5332"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>National Security Letters Reform Act, S. 2088</title>
    <link href="http://multiracial.com/site/content/view/1603/49/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-22:/commentary/2183192</id>
    <updated>2008-04-22T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Multiracial Activist </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Arlen Specter, Ranking Minority Member Senate Committee on the Judiciary 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Re: National Security Letters Reform Act, S. 2088 Dear Chairman Leahy and Ranking Member Specter: The ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://multiracial.com/site/content/view/1603/49/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Dual Challenge to National Security Letters</title>
    <link href="http://blog.aclu.org/index.php?/archives/619-A-Dual-Challenge-to-National-Security-Letters.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-15:/commentary/2064204</id>
    <updated>2008-04-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ACLU Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s been shown time and again that our intelligence agencies have been abusing their already-broad NSL powers, which is why we&amp;#39;re supporting HR 3189 and S. 2088, the National Security Letters Reform Act of 2007. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.aclu.org/index.php?/archives/619-A-Dual-Challenge-to-National-Security-Letters.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senator Russ Feingold Statement on NSL Report</title>
    <link href="http://www.pogowasright.org/blogs/dissent/?p=904" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-13:/commentary/1726013</id>
    <updated>2008-03-13T20:27:35Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chronicles of Dissent &#8212; &#8220;A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government&#8221; &#8212; Edward Abbey</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Russ Feingold Statement on NSL Report  in: 2008 Elections, Civil liberties, Congress, Surveillance   From a press release: ...  Letter Reform Act of 2007&#160; (NSL Reform Act of 2007) &lt;strong class="keyword"&gt;S.2088&lt;/strong&gt;  Senator Feingold&#8217;s bill &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pogowasright.org/blogs/dissent/?p=904"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Your favorite book sucks, and is un-American</title>
    <link href="http://www.metafilter.com/66973/Your-favorite-book-sucks-and-is-unAmerican" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-11-28:/commentary/1458829</id>
    <updated>2007-11-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>MetaFilter </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Want to change that? One step in the right direction would be to contact your Senator about getting S.2088 out of Committee and on to the floor. Oh, and tell them to vote for it. And then to override the veto.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.metafilter.com/66973/Your-favorite-book-sucks-and-is-unAmerican"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 2088, A bill to place reasonable limitations on the use of ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2088.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-24:/commentary/1166141</id>
    <updated>2007-09-24T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Welcome to WashingtonWatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 2088 would place reasonable limitations on the use of National Security Letters....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2088.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
