<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : News Articles for S.2248 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 Amendments Act of 2008</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s2248/atom_news" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s2248/news" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-10-29T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/news/47041</id>
  <entry>
    <title>On The Daily Show Tonight, Obama Jokes His White Half Will Be Confused of Who to Vote for</title>
    <link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AbcNews_PoliticalPunch/~3/F2MIvhCTDX0/on-the-daily-sh.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-29:/commentary/3164768</id>
    <updated>2008-10-29T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ABC News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...skinny dog, from the US Senate web site: U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 110th Congress - 2nd Session On Passage of the Bill (S.2248 as Amended ) McCain (R-AZ), Yea got more lies for us skinny? You have mistaken the temporary measure in February as the FISA&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AbcNews_PoliticalPunch/~3/F2MIvhCTDX0/on-the-daily-sh.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WASHINGTON, June 27 DC-RNC-Week-Change-II</title>
    <link href="http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/rnc-this-week-in-change,449905.shtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/2392676</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Earthtimes (press release),&amp;nbsp;UK</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(S. 2248, CQ Vote #19: Motion  Agreed To 69-19: R 48-0; D 20-28; I 1-1, 2/12/08, Obama Voted Nay) Obama Now Supports A Bill Reauthorizing Electronic ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/rnc-this-week-in-change,449905.shtml"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House Votes For Telco Immunity; Obama Will Support?</title>
    <link href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/06/21/1757259" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-21:/commentary/2368306</id>
    <updated>2008-06-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Slashdot</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It was a compromise in name only. by maynard (3337) Title II of HR 6304 is in substance the same as the original telecom immunity provisions of S. 2248, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/06/21/1757259"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senators Dodd and Feingold Criticize Bond&amp;#39;s False FISA &amp;quot;Compromise&amp;quot;</title>
    <link href="http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/06/11/18505930.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-11:/commentary/2368293</id>
    <updated>2008-06-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bay Area Indymedia,&amp;nbsp;CA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Information declassified in the committee report of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on the FISA Amendments Act, S. 2248, confirms that the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/06/11/18505930.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dodd Lobbies Colleagues to Toss FISA Immunities</title>
    <link href="http://blogs.courant.com/on_background/2008/06/dodd-lobbies-colleagues-to-tos.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-10:/commentary/2368294</id>
    <updated>2008-06-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Hartford Courant,&amp;nbsp;United States</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&amp;quot;Information declassified in the committee report of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on the FISA Amendments Act, S. 2248, confirms that the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.courant.com/on_background/2008/06/dodd-lobbies-colleagues-to-tos.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Elliot D. Cohen: The Bush/McCain Game Plan: What May Be in Store ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/1655" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-09:/commentary/2368291</id>
    <updated>2008-06-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BuzzFlash,&amp;nbsp;IL</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Unfortunately, the Senate version of proposed legislation (S.2248) that is supposed to protect against abuses of privacy, gives telecom companies immunity ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/1655"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>McCain snared in flip-flop flap over wiretapping immunity</title>
    <link href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-9960493-38.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-05:/commentary/2368292</id>
    <updated>2008-06-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CNET News,&amp;nbsp;CA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Last fall, while preparing our Tech Voter&amp;#39;s Guide, we asked McCain point-blank whether he would support the bill (S.2248) providing retroactive immunity. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-9960493-38.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Offering a Compromise on FISA, Telecom Immunity</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/05/offering_a_comp.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-23:/commentary/2368295</id>
    <updated>2008-05-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
So the Senate passed version of FISA legislation, S. 2248, provided retroactive immunity to the telecommunications companies. That bill would have passed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/05/offering_a_comp.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Tell Congress: No Telecom Immunity!</title>
    <link href="http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=25150" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-07:/commentary/2189092</id>
    <updated>2008-05-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>People For the American Way,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Under a version of the bill passed by the Senate and known as the FISA Amendments Act of 2007 (S.2248), the telecoms would be let off the hook for any past ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=25150"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Donnelly wrong on surveillance bill vote</title>
    <link href="http://www.southbendtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080306/Opinion/803060451/1063/Opinion" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-06:/commentary/1702909</id>
    <updated>2008-03-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>South Bend Tribune,&amp;nbsp;IN</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
We, the board of the League of Women Voters of South Bend, urge Donnelly to take a stand against the administration's pressure to pass S. 2248, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.southbendtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080306/Opinion/803060451/1063/Opinion"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FISA Myths: Lies and Misconceptions behind Bush's Push for FISA ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/1553" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-06:/commentary/1702910</id>
    <updated>2008-03-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BuzzFlash,&amp;nbsp;IL</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
There are seven popular FISA myths propagated by the Bush Administration in its attempt to gain passage of S. 2248 along with its retroactive immunity ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/1553"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress Trying to Reconcile Competing Surveillance Bills</title>
    <link href="http://www.cdt.org/publications/policyposts/2008/3" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-29:/commentary/1682428</id>
    <updated>2008-02-29T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Center for Democracy and Technology,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate's new bill, the FISA Amendments Act (S. 2248, the "Senate bill") also provides only minimal protections to the rights of Americans affected by ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cdt.org/publications/policyposts/2008/3"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bush Pressures Congress on Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.jbs.org/node/7257" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-29:/commentary/1682429</id>
    <updated>2008-02-29T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>John Birch Society,&amp;nbsp;WI</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate passed the bill (S. 2248) by 68-29 on February 12. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has so far refused to schedule a vote on the House version of the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.jbs.org/node/7257"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ron Paul Freedom Writer Responds to US Senator's Email</title>
    <link href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article2949.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-28:/commentary/1678679</id>
    <updated>2008-02-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Nolan Chart LLC,&amp;nbsp;VA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Thank you for taking the time to contact my office regarding S. 2248, the FISA Amendments Act of 2007. Your input is important to me, and I appreciate the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article2949.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Businesses Prefer Not to Be Sued, Film at 11</title>
    <link href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080227/145705373.shtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-27:/commentary/1674314</id>
    <updated>2008-02-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Techdirt</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Therefore, the Chamber urges the House to consider S. 2248 and pass this bipartisan compromise legislation. The Chamber firmly believes that the immunity ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080227/145705373.shtml"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sen. Herb Kohl explains why he voted for telecom immunity</title>
    <link href="http://www.dane101.com/current/2008/02/25/sen_herb_kohl_explains_why_he_voted_for_telecom_immunity" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-25:/commentary/1662569</id>
    <updated>2008-02-25T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ACLU (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
To that end, on October 26, 2007, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence approved S. 2248, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Amendments Act. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dane101.com/current/2008/02/25/sen_herb_kohl_explains_why_he_voted_for_telecom_immunity"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Today's Surveillance Developments...</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/todays_surveill.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-25:/commentary/1662589</id>
    <updated>2008-02-25T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... bipartisan passage of the legislation (S. 2248) and chiding House leadership for going on vacation instead of acting to extend surveillance authority. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/todays_surveill.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Fear Factor</title>
    <link href="http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/34185prs20080223.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-23:/commentary/1656421</id>
    <updated>2008-02-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>JURIST</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill, S. 2248, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Amendments Act of 2007, would grant the administration unfettered access to all ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/34185prs20080223.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FISA: The Plaintiff's Bar as Policymakers</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/fisa_the_plaint.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-19:/commentary/1638034</id>
    <updated>2008-02-19T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In the House, 21 Democratic members have expressed support for the Senate bill, S. 2248. But the activist left and plaintiff's bar seem to have the upper ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/fisa_the_plaint.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pelosi's shameful pandering</title>
    <link href="http://washingtontimes.com/article/20080218/EDITORIAL/934368458/1013" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-18:/commentary/1630096</id>
    <updated>2008-02-18T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Washington Times,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Last week, the Senate did the responsible thing, voting 68-29 for compromise legislation to overhaul FISA (S. 2248) and give retroactive liability ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://washingtontimes.com/article/20080218/EDITORIAL/934368458/1013"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>STATE SENATOR JOE PENNACCHIO ISSUES STATEMENT ON LAUTENBERG VOTE ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.politickernj.com/state-senator-joe-pennacchio-issues-statement-lautenberg-vote-against-fisa-amendments-16449" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-15:/commentary/1622563</id>
    <updated>2008-02-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PolitickerNJ,&amp;nbsp;NJ</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
At the heart of this issue, passage of S. 2248 guarantees liability protection for organizations and private citizens who help prevent terrorist attacks. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.politickernj.com/state-senator-joe-pennacchio-issues-statement-lautenberg-vote-against-fisa-amendments-16449"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FISA: This is Why They Want to Sue</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/fisa_this_is_wh.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-15:/commentary/1622565</id>
    <updated>2008-02-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In any case, mcjoan's comments reveal the politics of those who oppose S. 2248 and telecom immunity. To them, the purpose of the 40 lawsuits against the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/fisa_this_is_wh.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Roll Call Vote on Protect America Act Extension</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/roll_call_vote.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-13:/commentary/1612608</id>
    <updated>2008-02-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The surveillance law is set to expire Saturday. The House should now just pass S. 2248, the Senate-passed FISA amendments legislation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/roll_call_vote.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>McCain Violates Senate Oath</title>
    <link href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article2705.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-13:/commentary/1612609</id>
    <updated>2008-02-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Nolan Chart LLC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
He voted to pass S. 2248, a new law designed to replace the so-called "Protect America Act." Permitting the President to spy on Americans without a warrant. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article2705.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Majority of Senate Violates Oath Yesterday!</title>
    <link href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article2701.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-13:/commentary/1626367</id>
    <updated>2008-02-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Nolan Chart LLC,&amp;nbsp;VA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
They voted to pass S. 2248, a new law designed to replace the so-called "Protect America Act." This bill violates the Bill of Rights . ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article2701.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FISA Bill, S. 2248, Passes 68-29</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/fisa_bill_s_224.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-12:/commentary/1606352</id>
    <updated>2008-02-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A strong, bipartisan majority to pass S. 2248, allowing the legitimate use of foreign surveillance to protect Americans from being killed by terrorists. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/fisa_bill_s_224.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FISA and Retroactive Immunity</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/fisa_and_retroa.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-12:/commentary/1619692</id>
    <updated>2008-02-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate has resumed debate on S. 2248, the FISA amendments. Sen. Feingold (D-WI) just warned against a "dragnet that could sweep the private ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/fisa_and_retroa.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Votes to Expand Privacy Rights to Americans Abroad</title>
    <link href="http://www.salem-news.com/articles/february122008/wyden_abroad_2-12-08.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-12:/commentary/1606353</id>
    <updated>2008-02-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Salem-News.Com,&amp;nbsp;OR</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(WASHINGTON, DC) - In passing the FISA Amendments Act of 2007 (S.2248), the US Senate today voted to approve one of the largest expansions of privacy rights ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.salem-news.com/articles/february122008/wyden_abroad_2-12-08.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The FISA Roll Call Vote</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/the_fisa_roll_c.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-12:/commentary/1607824</id>
    <updated>2008-02-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The roll call vote on final passage of S. 2248, the FISA amendments, is available here. The vote was 68-29. Republicans: 48 yea, 0 nay, 1 absent (Graham of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/the_fisa_roll_c.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Week Ahead: The Week of February 11</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/post_31.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-11:/commentary/1602468</id>
    <updated>2008-02-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate convenes at 2 pm today and moves to S. 2248, the FISA amendments, revising the laws on collection of foreign intelligence. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/post_31.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>President Bush on Stimulus, FISA</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/president_bush_10.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-10:/commentary/1599399</id>
    <updated>2008-02-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CQPolitics.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate Intelligence Committee version of S. 2248 came out of committee with a bipartisan, 13-2 vote, but is opposed by the party's left wing, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/president_bush_10.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Remarks Prepared for Delivery by Attorney General Michael B ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;amp;amp;STORY=/www/story/02-07-2008/0004751761&amp;amp;amp;EDATE=" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-07:/commentary/1588029</id>
    <updated>2008-02-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>OMB Watch</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 2248, the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, includes tools contained in the Protect America Act that have allowed us to close critical intelligence gaps. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;amp;STORY=/www/story/02-07-2008/0004751761&amp;amp;EDATE="&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Remarks Prepared for Delivery by Attorney General Michael B ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.sunherald.com/447/story/355230.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-07:/commentary/1612610</id>
    <updated>2008-02-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>SunHerald.com,&amp;nbsp;MS</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 2248, the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, includes tools contained in the Protect America Act that have allowed us to close critical intelligence gaps. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sunherald.com/447/story/355230.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FISA Update: Debate Resumes</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/fisa_update_deb.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-06:/commentary/1578883</id>
    <updated>2008-02-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Debate has resumed on S. 2248, revising the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, after Senate leadership worked out a compromise and schedule on the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/fisa_update_deb.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FISA Fight Heats Up in Senate</title>
    <link href="http://www.ombwatch.org/article/articleview/4155/1/1?TopicID=1" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-05:/commentary/1573768</id>
    <updated>2008-02-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>OMB Watch</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... response to concerns about the overly broad authorities of the PAA, the Senate Intelligence Committee passed the FISA Amendments Act of 2007 (S. 2248), ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ombwatch.org/article/articleview/4155/1/1?TopicID=1"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Rejects Attempt to Remove Immunity for Utilities Aiding ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.jbs.org/node/6953" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-28:/commentary/1536783</id>
    <updated>2008-01-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>John Birch Society,&amp;nbsp;WI</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It is expected that this vote increases chances the legislation &amp;#8212; S.2248 &amp;#8212; will survive a final vote next week. The John Birch Society has warned its ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.jbs.org/node/6953"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FISA Cloture, FISA Fictions</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/01/_senator_bond_h.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-28:/commentary/1536799</id>
    <updated>2008-01-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate just failed to invoke cloture on the pending Intelligence Committee version of S. 2248, the FISA Amendments, by a vote of 48-45, not achieving ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/01/_senator_bond_h.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Up for Debate This Week: Economic Stimulus, Government ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.sunherald.com/447/story/328165.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-28:/commentary/1536784</id>
    <updated>2008-01-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>SunHerald.com,&amp;nbsp;MS</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate will continue debating S. 2248, a bill to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978. Among other things, it would authorize ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sunherald.com/447/story/328165.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bush Gives Final State of Union Address Tonight</title>
    <link href="http://usgovinfo.about.com/b/2008/01/28/bush-gives-final-state-of-union-address-tonight.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-28:/commentary/1536785</id>
    <updated>2008-01-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>About - News &amp;amp; Issues,&amp;nbsp;NY</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On Saturday, the President said he planned to focus on two key issues in his speech: the economy, and passage by Congress of a bill (S. 2248) amending the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://usgovinfo.about.com/b/2008/01/28/bush-gives-final-state-of-union-address-tonight.htm"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The State of the Union on FISA</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/01/the_state_of_th_2.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-28:/commentary/1536810</id>
    <updated>2008-01-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Then how to explain the very similar case made by the Senate Intelligence Committee, which voted out S. 2248 on a 13-2 bipartisan basis. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/01/the_state_of_th_2.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>With Kucinich Gone, John Edwards May Be The Candidate Of Hope</title>
    <link href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_william__080126_with_kucinich_gone_2c_.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-26:/commentary/1531717</id>
    <updated>2008-01-26T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>OpEdNews,&amp;nbsp;PA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senate Debate - Spy Bill - FISA S.2248 - CALL SENATORS NOW! Senator Edwards sent the following email to supporters this afternoon. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_william__080126_with_kucinich_gone_2c_.htm"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FISA Again No Amnesty fot Telecoms</title>
    <link href="http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474977240307" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-25:/commentary/1523018</id>
    <updated>2008-01-25T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Gather.com,&amp;nbsp;MA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
by Don (I miss the Constitution) S. The terrible Intelligence Committee-passed version of the FISA Amendments Act -- S. 2248 -- is back, and it's being ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474977240307"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Holding Telecoms Hostage: A Dangerous Game</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/01/holding_telecom.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-24:/commentary/1522602</id>
    <updated>2008-01-24T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Stuart Taylor, as usual, has an insightful column in today's National Journal on the debate over S. 2248, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act update. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/01/holding_telecom.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Filibuster Threatened Over Wiretap Law</title>
    <link href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/24/national/main3748882.shtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-24:/commentary/1522603</id>
    <updated>2008-01-24T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CQPolitics.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The bill is S.2248. There is a competing FISA bill from the Judiciary Committee which does not grant immunity. "Few things are more detrimental to this ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/24/national/main3748882.shtml"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Positive Movement on FISA</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/01/positive_moveme.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-24:/commentary/1522995</id>
    <updated>2008-01-24T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Let&amp;#8217;s pass this bill, and protect this vital tool before it expires. The Intelligence Committee's version of S. 2248 was reported out on a 13-2, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/01/positive_moveme.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FISA: Polling the Fiction Instead of the Fact</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/01/fisa_stop_playi.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-23:/commentary/1522988</id>
    <updated>2008-01-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Trouble is, the Senate bill, S. 2248, poses none of the constitutional threats the group says it does. The ACLU has polled a veritable school of red herring ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/01/fisa_stop_playi.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Economic Stimulus and the Debate This Week: Indian Health ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;amp;amp;STORY=/www/story/01-22-2008/0004740078&amp;amp;amp;EDATE=" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-22:/commentary/1522587</id>
    <updated>2008-01-22T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PR Newswire (press release),&amp;nbsp;NY</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 2248 An original bill to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, to modernize and streamline the provisions of that Act, and for other ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;amp;STORY=/www/story/01-22-2008/0004740078&amp;amp;EDATE="&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Economic Stimulus and the Debate This Week: Indian Health ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.sunherald.com/447/story/314772.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-22:/commentary/1526886</id>
    <updated>2008-01-22T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Biloxi Sun Herald,&amp;nbsp; USA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 2248 An original bill to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, to modernize and streamline the provisions of that Act, and for other ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sunherald.com/447/story/314772.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Week Ahead: The Week of January 21</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/01/the_week_ahead_132.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-21:/commentary/1522589</id>
    <updated>2008-01-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Debate on S. 2248, revising the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, is possible. List of the week's committee hearings here. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/01/the_week_ahead_132.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Major Election Year Challenges to Congress</title>
    <link href="http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272618268.shtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-15:/commentary/1453398</id>
    <updated>2008-01-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>National Ledger,&amp;nbsp;AZ</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate this month is expected to take up debate on S. 2248, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Amendments Act of 2007. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272618268.shtml"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress now has the chance to do nothing and make it count.</title>
    <link href="http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=5554" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-10:/commentary/1448701</id>
    <updated>2008-01-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>OpEdNews,&amp;nbsp;PA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Congress reconvenes January 22nd 2008, Senate Majority leader Harry (hapless) Reid plans to bring an unacceptable bill S. 2248 to the Senate floor for a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=5554"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sen. Hatch Demolishes FISA Myths and Mongering</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2007/12/sen_hatch_demol.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-19:/commentary/1388840</id>
    <updated>2007-12-19T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Opponents of the Senate Intelligence Committee version of S. 2248 rarely mention these considerations: On numerous occasions in the FISA debate, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2007/12/sen_hatch_demol.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FISA Amendments, Delayed But Needed</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2007/12/fisa_amendments_1.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-18:/commentary/1387740</id>
    <updated>2007-12-18T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Reid's decision to pull S. 2248, the FISA Amendments, from floor consideration in 2008, "Reid holds off on spy bill after immunity survives. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2007/12/fisa_amendments_1.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Road to Impeachment</title>
    <link href="http://www.fogcityjournal.com/news_in_brief/tc_impeachment_071218.shtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-18:/commentary/1387509</id>
    <updated>2007-12-18T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Fog City Journal,&amp;nbsp;CA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... writes: Unfortunately, the bill we are going to be considering is the one reported out by the Senate Intelligence Committee in October, S. 2248. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.fogcityjournal.com/news_in_brief/tc_impeachment_071218.shtml"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Information Magic Eight-Ball</title>
    <link href="http://www.ombwatch.org/article/articleview/4121/1/1?TopicID=1" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-18:/commentary/1387807</id>
    <updated>2007-12-18T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>OMB Watch</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... to forgive companies that handed over client information to the government in the Senate's reform bill, the FISA Amendments Act of 2007 (S. 2248). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ombwatch.org/article/articleview/4121/1/1?TopicID=1"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dodd Wins Battle in Spy Bill Standoff</title>
    <link href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0712/S00240.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-18:/commentary/1390501</id>
    <updated>2007-12-18T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Scoop.co.nz,&amp;nbsp;New Zealand</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Dodd had threatened to stand and filibuster S.2248, a bill drafted by the Senate Intelligence Committee that would have changed the Foreign Intelligence ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0712/S00240.htm"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Intelligence Committee's FISA Bill Advances</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2007/12/intelligence_co.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-17:/commentary/1389635</id>
    <updated>2007-12-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate voted 76-10 to proceed with the Senate Intelligence Committee's version of the FISA Amendments Act, S. 2248. That's the version that passed out ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2007/12/intelligence_co.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The FISA Debate Begins</title>
    <link href="http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/specialguests/2007/dec/17/the_fisa_debate_begins" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-17:/commentary/1387464</id>
    <updated>2007-12-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The first vote will come around noon, on the motion to invoke cloture (or limit debate) on the motion to proceed to (or consider) S. 2248. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/specialguests/2007/dec/17/the_fisa_debate_begins"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New White House Statement on FISA Amendments</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2007/12/new_white_house.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-17:/commentary/1387467</id>
    <updated>2007-12-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The White House has issued a new Statement of Administration Policy on S. 2248, the FISA Amendments. The Senate Judiciary Committee's version of the bill ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2007/12/new_white_house.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Tell Your Senators: No Telecom Immunity!</title>
    <link href="http://actions.pfaw.org/siteapps/advocacy/ActionItem.aspx?c=enJHKINrFqG&amp;amp;amp;b=848149&amp;amp;amp;aid=9443" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-17:/commentary/1387508</id>
    <updated>2007-12-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Under a version of the bill passed by the Intelligence Committee and known as the FISA Amendments Act of 2007 (S.2248), the telecoms would be let off the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://actions.pfaw.org/siteapps/advocacy/ActionItem.aspx?c=enJHKINrFqG&amp;amp;b=848149&amp;amp;aid=9443"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate debate begins; Dodd set to filibuster telecom immunity</title>
    <link href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23113" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-17:/commentary/1389636</id>
    <updated>2007-12-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NetworkWorld.com,&amp;nbsp;MA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I rise to urge my colleagues to vote against cloture on S. 2248, the FISA Amendments Act of 2007. Opposing cloture is essential, because there is no ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23113"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reid to bring Intel committee FISA bill to floor Monday.</title>
    <link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/14/reid-to-bring-intel-committee-fisa-bill-to-floor-monday/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-14:/commentary/1387466</id>
    <updated>2007-12-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Think Progress,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&amp;#8220;I will shortly move to proceed to S. 2248, the FISA Improvement Act of 2007. I spoke briefly on this subject earlier, but I want to provide a more complete ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/14/reid-to-bring-intel-committee-fisa-bill-to-floor-monday/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senators Lobby Reid to Keep Telecom Immunity out of Surveillance Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004890.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-12:/commentary/1384560</id>
    <updated>2007-12-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>TPMmuckraker.com,&amp;nbsp;NY</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
We urge you to make the version of S. 2248 reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee the base bill to be considered by the full Senate. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004890.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Where does Harry Reid stand?</title>
    <link href="http://washingtontimes.com/article/20071207/EDITORIAL/112070008/1013" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-07:/commentary/1381943</id>
    <updated>2007-12-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Washington Times,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
If the Intelligence Committee bill (S. 2248) reaches the floor next week, Mr. Leahy is expected to offer an amendment that would ensure that businesses are ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://washingtontimes.com/article/20071207/EDITORIAL/112070008/1013"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>On Telecom Liability: Where Does Sen. Reid Stand?</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2007/12/on_telecom_liab.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-07:/commentary/1383340</id>
    <updated>2007-12-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manufacturers' Blog,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
If the Intelligence Committee bill (S. 2248) reaches the floor next week, Mr. Leahy is expected to offer an amendment that would ensure that businesses are ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2007/12/on_telecom_liab.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Elliot D. Cohen: The Tele Gate Crisis: Stop Bush's Electronic ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/1448" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-11-26:/commentary/1364005</id>
    <updated>2007-11-26T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BuzzFlash,&amp;nbsp;IL</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Both HR3373 and S. 2248 explicitly immunize the telecoms against any cause of action connected with any future compliance with the terms of the bill. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/1448"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Elliot D. Cohen: Senate Judiciary Poised to Pass Total Information ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/1429" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-11-12:/commentary/1349540</id>
    <updated>2007-11-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BuzzFlash,&amp;nbsp;IL</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Now, it is attempting to pass through the FISA Amendments Act of 2007 (S. 2248), a bill that would affectively give legal standing and retroactive legal ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/1429"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Civil Liberties groups turn up heat over telecom immunity</title>
    <link href="http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-blogs/washington/secrecy/entries/2007/11/07/civil_liberties_groups_turn_up.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-11-07:/commentary/1328716</id>
    <updated>2007-11-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Austin American-Statesman,&amp;nbsp;TX</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
*The bill (S. 2248) would grant the attorney general the power to prevent any court or public utility commission from reviewing whether state and federal ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-blogs/washington/secrecy/entries/2007/11/07/civil_liberties_groups_turn_up.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senators Question Telco Domestic Spying Immunity</title>
    <link href="http://www.channelinsider.com/article/Senators+Question+Telco+Domestic+Spying+Immunity/218571_1.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-11-01:/commentary/1378309</id>
    <updated>2007-11-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Channel Insider,&amp;nbsp;NY</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence has already approved legislation (S. 2248) that would grant immunity to the carriers for their participation in ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.channelinsider.com/article/Senators+Question+Telco+Domestic+Spying+Immunity/218571_1.aspx"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senators Question Telco Domestic Spying Immunity</title>
    <link href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,2210899,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-11-01:/commentary/1304040</id>
    <updated>2007-11-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>eWeek,&amp;nbsp; NY</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence already has approved legislation (S. 2248) that would grant immunity to the carriers for their participation in ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,2210899,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senators Question Telco Domestic Spying Immunity</title>
    <link href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2210899,00.asp" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-11-01:/commentary/1304061</id>
    <updated>2007-11-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>eWeek,&amp;nbsp; NY</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence has already approved legislation (S. 2248) that would grant immunity to the carriers for their participation in ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2210899,00.asp"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ACLU, moveon, People For the American Way and 250000 Americans ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nsaspying/32488prs20071031.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-31:/commentary/1302696</id>
    <updated>2007-10-31T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ACLU (press release),&amp;nbsp;NY</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Legislation moving through the Senate (S. 2248) seeks to add a provision that would grant immunity to telecom companies involved in the president&amp;#8217;s domestic ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nsaspying/32488prs20071031.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
