<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for S.2298 A bill to prohibit an applicant from obtaining a low-power FM license if an applicant has engaged in any manner in the unlicensed operation of any station in violation of section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934.</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s2298/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s2298/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2007-10-31T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/47207</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Action: Introduced: S. 2298: A bill to prohibit an applicant ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2298" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-31:/commentary/1306692</id>
    <updated>2007-10-31T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Tracked by GovTrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Olympia Snowe [R-ME] introduced S. 2298: A bill to prohibit an applicant from obtaining a low-power FM license if an applicant has engaged in any manner in the unlicensed operation of any station in violation of section 301 of the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2298"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 2298, A bill to prohibit an applicant from obtaining a low ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2298.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-31:/commentary/1310249</id>
    <updated>2007-10-31T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Welcome to WashingtonWatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 2298 would prohibit an applicant from obtaining a low-power FM license if an applicant has engaged in any manner in the unlicensed operation of any station in violation of section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2298.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
