S.2433 - Global Poverty Act of 2007

A bill to require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day. view all titles (3)

All Bill Titles

  • Short: Global Poverty Act of 2007 as introduced.
  • Short: Global Poverty Act of 2007 as reported to senate.
  • Official: A bill to require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day. as introduced.

This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.

Comments Feed

Displaying 241-270 of 285 total comments.

Anonymous 02/28/2008 3:09am
Link Reply
+ -1

Are you all on crack or something? The US has oppressed peoples from all over the world, and has promoted slave labor and sweatshops so you freaks can buy crap at Walmart.

Poverty is real. And its now hitting us here in the US because big corporations want our US labor force to be slaves again.

Shut up. Idiots

Anonymous 02/28/2008 3:08am

Are you all on crack or something? The US has oppressed peoples from all over the world, and has promoted slave labor and sweatshops so you freaks can by crap at Walmart.

Poverty is real. And its not hitting us here in the US because big corporations want our US labor force to be slaves again.

Shut up. Idiots

Anonymous 02/27/2008 12:18pm

Better yet, google: Bayer UN AIDS

Anonymous 02/27/2008 12:15pm

A dangerous direction.
Foreign aid has never worked. In fact ,through the devices of the UN, it has been used to fortify the coffers of multinational corporations (Pharma, Agri, etc.) often to the extreme detriment to the people the money is supposed to be helping. This is NOT an accident. The UN knows that the cheapest, most effective way to reduce poverty by 50% is to speed the deaths of those people: 1)By controlling and diminishing the nutritive value in the food supply with GM (read about Codex Alimentarius and how it’s coming to the US). 2)By keeping those regions in conflict. (Ask yourself why nothing was done about Rwanda – and why nothing is being done about Darfur) 3)by engineering treatment resistant disease strains… (google Bayer AIDS)

dnallen88 02/27/2008 6:45am

The time has come for the United States to focus in its own citizens. The government should not put the welfare of global citizens before its own. The gap between the rich and the poor continues to grow, and an increasing number of families are without healthcare. The United States cannot expect to remain economically strong while constantly playing “mother” to the world. Also I feel that the United States has violated the liberties of other nations in the name of welfare.

randy 02/26/2008 12:47pm

Who the hell do these people think they are ? Everyone of them should thank God that they have the job they have because if they keep trying to push crap like “bill 2433” over on the American people who pay them , I believe we will have to start getting rid of all incumbents especially the ones who refuse to live by our Constitution . Do they think we are asleep? They wounder why we don’t send contributions to support their Socialist Agendas! We are watching and for now we can vote your ass’es out ! Wake Up America !

rburciar 02/26/2008 10:51am
in reply to Anonymous Feb 16, 2008 7:18pm

You are absolutely correct, there is NOTHING in the BILL. It is all fluff. But let’s get real; we can’t even take care of our own citizens in New Orleans. How do you think they would feel when our own public officials take valuable tax paying time to create a bill when we still have displaced families since 2005. Shame on us. Let’s clean up our own backyard before we stick our noses in other places.

bcleland2 02/26/2008 7:31am

Seems we never learn. Spending poverty into oblivion has NEVER worked.
Until our government is able to achieve a budget surplus while meeting all of its Constitutional duties, it can not be trusted to fix problems in other countries (which is NOT a Constitutional duty).

1947 02/26/2008 7:00am
Link Reply
+ -1

Have the majority of our US Congressmen and Senators forgotten who they represent? I’m tired of the amount of money (taxpayer dollars) being sent to help other nations. When we have so many needs that should be addressed first here in the US. WHEN WILL OUR GOVERNMENT START USING COMMON SENSE AND TAKE CARE OF THE TAXPAYERS HERE! THE USA TAXPAYERS ARE BEING PIMPED TO OTHER NATIONS TO MAKE THEM WEALTHY. IT IS TIME TO PUT A STOP TO THE MADNESS.

WE SHOULD VOTE OUT ALL OF THE CURRENT SENATORS AND CONGRESSMEN!! X OUT ALL OF THEM!

WE WOULD BE BETTER OFF VOTING THE COMMENTATORS OF THE VARIOUS NEWS NETWORKS TO OFFICE, THEIR NAMES SHOULD BE WRITTEN IN COME VOTING TIME.

1947 02/26/2008 6:53am

Have the majority of our US Congressmen and Senators forgotten who they represent? I’m tired of the amount of money (taxpayer dollars) being sent to help other nations. When we have so many needs that should be addressed first here in the US. WHEN WILL OUR GOVERNMENT START USING COMMON SENCE AND TAKE CARE OF THE TAXPAYERS HERE! THE USA TAXPAYERS ARE BEING PIMPED TO OTHER NATIONS TO MAKE THEM WEALTHY. IT IS TIME TO PUT A STOP TO THE MADNESS.

WE SHOULD VOTE OUT ALL OF THE CURRENT SENATORS AND CONGRESSMEN!! X OUT ALL OF THEM!

WE WOULD BE BETTER OFF VOTING THE COMMENTATORS OF THE VARIOUS NEWS NETWORKS TO OFFICE, THEIR NAMES SHOULD BE WRITTEN IN COME VOTING TIME.

Anonymous 02/26/2008 5:44am

The good news is, with the dollar’s continuous drop in value against foreign currencies, the goal of this bill will be easily achieved.

Anonymous 02/25/2008 11:12pm
Link Reply
+ -1

JamesKlichll, You have to be kidding me?! If this is a “great bill” then I have some ocean front property in Arizona I’d like to sell you. How asinine of a statement. Whats wrong with using the money that we, as American taxpayers, pay for economic issues in the United States? Why do we, as Americans, have to bail every other country out of debt and raise their citizens out of poverty when we have our own issues to deal with? It’s not our responsibility.

You know, its kind of like that speech flight attendants make before every flight, regarding the oxygen masks…put the mask on yourself first before helping others. If you can’t take care of yourself first, then you along with the others will die.

We need to take care of our home first.

Anonymous 02/25/2008 10:58pm
Link Reply
+ -3
in reply to Anonymous Feb 16, 2008 7:18pm

Why is it the responsibility of the United States taxpayers to pay even $1 to a foreign country? ITS NOT! We pay taxes in this country FOR our country…that is unless you are a foreigner and want to see the bankruptcy of America!

Anonymous 02/25/2008 1:25pm
Link Reply
+ -1

Obama wants to spend our money on world problems instead of american problems as he claims during his talks. tell him to stop spending our money. we need it here,. the UN is not anyplace to send any money. they learned how to waste it more than even congress

Anonymous 02/23/2008 6:48am

The wording that doesn’t say GDP/GNP INCOME TAX is there to distribute the money and make sure wiavers can be put in place for countries that have US or UN sanctions in place. For example, a military coup ends the democratic government of a country that is in Iraq and all forms of US and UN aid are cut off but election reform. The President no longer has to issue a waiver for funds under national security, but can have the Secretary of State issue a waiver for funds under security concerns using the State Department special account set up for funding in country and waived sanctions to keep the money going to the country around sanctions. This is how Peace Corps is funded in countries like Fiji, Thailand, Philippines, etc. and all other funding is cut off due to sanctions. The GDP/GNP INCOME TAX funds could get the same type of wiavers from the Secretary of State, not the President, for countries that are deemed needy of the funding regardless of US or UN sanctions, like Peace Corps.

The wording is there to make sure the GDP/GNP INCOME TAX is not cut off to countries under sanctions.

hazillow 02/23/2008 6:24am

have you morons even read the bill? it doesn’t allocate any more or less funds for foreign aid – that is and always has been set separately.

InGodWeTrust 02/22/2008 2:41pm

We are NOT the saviors of the world. Save America from the globalist regime and one world order! NO! We are tired of being taxed to death. We are tired of paying the wages of a government who does not listen to us.

Ike 02/22/2008 11:50am

Just when I thought this nation couldn’t be dumbed down any more…

Did anyone click the links and actually read the bills? There is nothing — repeat nothing — in that bill that calls for spending of a dime. Our foreign aid is budgeted and appropriated every year and very littel goes to Africa. There is also nothing in the bill that directs the suspension of the 2nd amendment, kicking puppies, drowning helpless kittens, killing the “unborn” or (unfortunately) believing everything a paid propagandist tells you.

The US agreed to the Millennium Development Goals before Obama came to the senate and your President has been implementing our end of what we agreed to in 2000. Are we doing it for altruistic reasons? Hardly, and most of our foreign aid never leaves this country. It goes into deep corporate pockets, but that’s another story. Your prez knows Africa is about 50% Muslim and that poverty breeds nasty people who kill us. He has said that repeatedly and has tripled aid to Africa since taking office. He did it without help from Obama… Go figure.

BTW, we’re halfway to the Millennium target of 2015 and how much aid have we given Africa, the 2nd largest continent with a population of 1 billion? I think we’re up to about $27 billion or a fraction of what we’ve given to Israel… Whoooo hooo! That’s about 27 bux per person (or 1/6th of what we hand out in corporate welfare every years) so that will sure stop poverty in its tracks. Do some homework people.

As for Obama driving the “socialist” (???) “Global Tax” train, the bill was introduced by Rep Adam Smith in the HR almost a year ago and passed unanimously (because it doesn’t mandate spending a dime and it makes us feel good). Obama (and Hagel and Cantwell who aren’t mentioned in news for dummies) is simply introducing the bill in the Senate.

If you’ll notice, this isn’t new news at all and has been in the works for some time. Mr Cliff Kincaid is behind the endless carp you’re reading and if you Google him you’ll find that he is a right wing hack funded by R.M. Scaife, another POS. He targets the tinfoil hat crowd. :/

KWN 02/22/2008 9:10am

Short and simple! We have enough governmental financial issues in our country now. With our homeowners being foreclosed on, corporations moving to the countries this bill is going to give money to; should I keep going? Let’s fix our financial, business and job status in this country FIRST. We don’t need to dabble in other countries economies any more than we already are. This bill/law will just muck things up more and make us go further into a financial abyss.

tmdyer 02/21/2008 7:14pm

Our government has no business in taking care of the world. Let’s repair and restore our own country before we investigate solutions for such an unfeasible notion.

ABNU 02/19/2008 10:42am

Response to:
“That would be unconstitutional as Senator Obama knows as he was a Constitutional Lawyer at Univ of Chicago Law School for ten years.”

obama, as far as I can tell, is a socialist. our constitution is somewhat of a non-sequitur if not a antithesis to a socialist point of view. it certainly has no effect nor meaning should a president (with the support of the other 2 branches of government) choose to ignore it; that is to say, there is no law that says ‘government’ cannot pass laws that may (later) be found to be unconstitutional. We will suffer years under an unconstitutional law, yet no one will go to jail, and no fines will be levied; the constitution it is said, “has no teeth”.

What remains is a question of Obama’s intellectual honesty and existential dedication to the spirit of the constitution. And again I disagree that Obama ‘cares’ about the constitution. For example, he wants more gun laws but promises that they won’t impinge on the rights of ‘hunters’ (that old saw). The truth is, the right to own a gun is was specified as a tacit agreement that the government should fear the citizenry; the citizenry would remain armed such that they could fend off an ‘out of control government’. When people mention that, the “true” reason for the 2nd amendment, ‘we’ call them crazy. I agree that the practicality of a violent revolution in the US, small arms and semi-automatic weapons vs. the modern might of the US military is in fact, absurd.

However, the principle is very sound and necessary, and a constitution expert would certainly know it has nothing to do with hunting. Only a demagogue or one of their idiot followers would believe that even the concept of self defense against government is futile and counterproductive because a (US) socialist government is benevolent and fair (now who sounds crazy?). Yet that belief is the guiding principle of (US) socialism, which explains why in spite of Obama’s years as a constitutionalist, the principal purport of most if not all of his legislation is unconstitutional (or at least contrary to its philosophy) and socialist in nature. Obama and Hillary agree, only government can bring good things; the constitution often gets in their way. Yes, he ‘knows’ the constitution, but only because he needs to be able to circumnavigate it, not because he wants to abide by it.

ABNU (anonymous but not unknown)

PS Sorry this is so long, I’m trying to get a blog at
http://www.electronicfreedomfoundation.org.
but they don’t seem to be able to get off the ground. See? I’m trying to volunteer and lead by example!

ABNU 02/19/2008 9:19am

Response to:
“The bill does not say how the US will do this and it certainly does not place any tax or other mandate on the Gov’t.”

unless the president is going to work on his own time, in a donated office using donated funds, it’s tax money. the government is not a charity, it takes your money and spends it on whatever it does. It owns nothing but debt, which is always passed along to us and ours.

So again, if you want to help people in other countries, go there and “fix” them. Be their leader, boil their water, show them how to find food and build shoe factories, bring condoms. Keep a list of all the poor souls you’ve helped and you may be able to get it deducted from your taxes, or it may get you into heaven—either way you won’t know til you try. Lead by example.

ABNU (anonymous but not unknown)

PS The only people who should even think about supporting this are people who have already spent years as an “in-country” volunteer for a foreign aid charity. To support it otherwise makes you a lazy hypocrite IMHO.

JamesKlichII 02/18/2008 6:49pm
Link Reply
+ -1

This sounds like a great bill but I am not sure if the United States has the money to implement this. If funding is an issue maybe the bill could be phased in over a longer time table. There are many issues we need to address inside the United States.

Filtered Comment [ show ]

Anonymous 02/17/2008 4:10pm

So “Shall” means that if you want a wall painted red you Shall let the Painter decided the best strategy of getting the paint applied to the wall and in your mind that is somehow being misconstrued by us “common folk”.

I think you miss everyones point in the that America doesn’t want the red paint on the wall.

Or maybe that Obama has a Job in which HE is supposed to set goals for america NOW as a Senator not make us reach other countries Goals ahead of our own.

Creating equality by bringing the wealthy down to the poverty line is not something even the poor of America want.

Taxing my employer to the point he has no profit doesn’t exactly make my job secure. Sure you will lower my taxes only because I will be unemployed and have to pay less taxes.

I mix the tax debate into this because these Senators just happen to be the ones who want to tax companies into a “balanced budget” situation with an extra 3/4 trillion dollars of spending in just this one bill.

Ooops did we forget to mention that in our television ad or youtube spots.

Anonymous 02/16/2008 7:18pm

I’ve read the actual proposed legislation and this article is an extreme spin of what the actual bill says.

Read it for yourself.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:s2433:

The article below focuses on one paragraph and one sentence in particular:

(a) Strategy- The President, acting through the Secretary of State, and in consultation with the heads of other appropriate departments and agencies of the United States Government, international organizations, international financial institutions, the governments of developing and developed countries, United States and international nongovernmental organizations, civil society organizations, and other appropriate entities, shall develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.

Somehow they extrapolate that sentence to mean the the U.S. would somehow be mandated to follow everything in the Millennium Development Goals. Read the bill. It says NOTHING like that. The only thing it mentions is that the US would try to meet that one goal of helping global poverty. The bill does not say how the US will do this and it certainly does not place any tax or other mandate on the Gov’t. That would be unconstitutional as Senator Obama knows as he was a Constitutional Lawyer at Univ of Chicago Law School for ten years. In fact it says, as you can see above, “The President shall shall develop and implement a comprehensive strategy……”, this means the President has DISCRETION on how he will develop and implement such a strategy. There is NOTHING is this bill that suggest and certainly nothing that mandates how this gets done.

Anonymous 02/16/2008 4:15pm
Link Reply
+ -2

Check out detailed bill information on SB2433 HERE: </> http://www.statesurge.com/bills/26563

Anonymous 02/16/2008 11:07am

Live 8/G8. It’s not the British so we’re supposed to agree to having a percentage of our country’s GDP/GNP income tax taken and sent overseas without a vote in Congress? This is taxation of out country’s income for foreign governments. If it’s not their goevernments, it’s NGOs. The money taken out of our GDP/GNP income tax will be used by the governments and NGOs for their own people and the dollar getting to the guy on the street will be, maybe 15 cents and it won’t be cash. No one is getting the US GDP/GNP tax money, but friends of the administration.

Obama wants to play with Hollywood and Singers. Please. ‘yes we can.’ A new dem tax on our country’s income, so the President can pay off friends is ridiculous.

Moderated Comment

bobohack1 02/16/2008 10:22am

We need to take care of our own country. There are plenty of hungry people living here that the government seems to ignore. Black, white, red and yellow and any variations there-of living here should be our priority; NOT THE REST OF THE WORLD!!!!!!! Bob


Vote on This Bill

14% Users Support Bill

124 in favor / 771 opposed
 

Send Your Senator a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC

Top-Rated Comments