<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for S.2591 A bill to amend chapter 1 of title 17, United States Code, to provide an exemption from exclusive rights in copyright for certain nonprofit organizations to display live football games, and for other purposes.</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s2591/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s2591/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-04-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/48966</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Introduced: . . .to provide an exemption from exclusive ...</title>
    <link href="http://jcjudge.net/?p=1054" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-10:/commentary/2032875</id>
    <updated>2008-04-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Blog Law and Order - RSS Feeds </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 2591 was introduced on February 4, 2008, in the Senate: &amp;quot;&#226;&#8218;&#172;&#197;&#8220;To amend chapter 1 of title 17, United States Code, to provide an exemption from exclusive rights in copyright for certain nonprofit organizations to display live football ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jcjudge.net/?p=1054"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Failure as a Blogger</title>
    <link href="http://www.worldflat.duetrade.com/2008/02/24/world-class-l/failure-as-a-blogger.jsp" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-24:/commentary/1675965</id>
    <updated>2008-02-24T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>World Flat </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Arlen Specter, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, introduced a bill [S. 2591] this week that would allow houses of worship to show football games on big-screen televisions. The legislation was among a flurry of action ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.worldflat.duetrade.com/2008/02/24/world-class-l/failure-as-a-blogger.jsp"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Introduced: . . .to provide an exemption from exclusive ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.copyright.gov/newsnet/2008/338.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-11:/commentary/1603938</id>
    <updated>2008-02-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>US Copyright Office: NewsNet </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 2591 was introduced on February 4, 2008, in the Senate: &amp;quot;&#226;&#8218;&#172;&#197;&#8220;To amend chapter 1 of title 17, United States Code, to provide an exemption from exclusive rights in copyright for certain nonprofit organizations to display live football ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.copyright.gov/newsnet/2008/338.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Make Viewing the Super Bowl at Church Legal</title>
    <link href="http://bielefeldtpapers.blogspot.com/2008/02/make-viewing-super-bowl-at-church-legal.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-11:/commentary/1603939</id>
    <updated>2008-02-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Bielefeldt Papers </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I&amp;#39;m writing to ask your support of S. 2591, which allows churches to provide public viewings of professional football events. Public viewings of free public broadcasts actually serve to increase revenue to professional sports franchises ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://bielefeldtpapers.blogspot.com/2008/02/make-viewing-super-bowl-at-church-legal.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Though I think that the NFL &#8230;</title>
    <link href="http://www.civilcommotion.com/index.php?p=3726" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-08:/commentary/1594182</id>
    <updated>2008-02-08T13:12:36Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Civil Commotion</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Though I think that the NFL &#8230; Bob Felton @ 8:11 am    &#8230; is foolish to bother itself with smacking-around churches that hold Super Bowl parties, ...  the game. So this week, Sen. Arlen Specter introduced &lt;strong class="keyword"&gt;S.2591&lt;/strong&gt;, a bill t&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.civilcommotion.com/index.php?p=3726"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Should churches be able to ignore the NFL&amp;#39;s IP rights?</title>
    <link href="http://sports-law.blogspot.com/2008/02/should-churches-be-able-to-ignore-nfls.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-08:/commentary/1594181</id>
    <updated>2008-02-08T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Sports Law Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Arlen Specter introduced S.2591, a bill to permit churches to display televised professional football contests free of copyright concerns, so long as no direct charge is made for viewing the game, no money is received by the church ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://sports-law.blogspot.com/2008/02/should-churches-be-able-to-ignore-nfls.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Watch out for that Separation of Church/NFL</title>
    <link href="http://aleyh.com/blogs/pro-bowl/514628/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-07:/commentary/1597717</id>
    <updated>2008-02-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pro bowl </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... a bit of news I first learned about at the Media Monarchy blog: bill would end separation of church &amp;amp; super bowl It seems that Senator Arlen Specter introduced a bill (S. 2591) this week that would allow Churches... er... houses ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://aleyh.com/blogs/pro-bowl/514628/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Watch out for that Separation of Church/NFL</title>
    <link href="http://nfl.blogspace4you.info/?p=22251" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-07:/commentary/1614616</id>
    <updated>2008-02-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Nfl </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... post today on Watch out for that Separation of Church/NFL Here&#226;&#8364;&#8482;sa quick excerpt It seems that Senator Arlen Specter introduced a bill (S. 2591) this week that would allow Churches&#226;&#8364;&#166; er&#226;&#8364;&#166; Check out the resf of this post over here.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://nfl.blogspace4you.info/?p=22251"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>bill would end separation of church &amp;amp; super bowl</title>
    <link href="http://mediamonarchy.blogspot.com/2008/02/bill-would-end-separation-of-church.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-07:/commentary/1647126</id>
    <updated>2008-02-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>media monarchy </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Arlen Specter, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, introduced a bill (S. 2591) this week that would allow houses of worship to show football games on big-screen televisions. The legislation was among a flurry of action ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://mediamonarchy.blogspot.com/2008/02/bill-would-end-separation-of-church.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New Bill Would Immunize Church Super Bowl Parties</title>
    <link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/02/06/new-bill-would-immunize-church-super-bowl-parties/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-06:/commentary/1580642</id>
    <updated>2008-02-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Info/Law </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... a new statutory exception to copyright&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s public performance right for churches to exhibit &#226;&#8364;&#339;a transmission or retransmission of a performance embodying a professional football contest.&#226;&#8364;&#157; (Here&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s the full text of the bill, S. 2591.) ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/02/06/new-bill-would-immunize-church-super-bowl-parties/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Action: Introduced: S. 2591: A bill to amend chapter 1 of ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2591" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-03:/commentary/1573779</id>
    <updated>2008-02-03T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Tracked by GovTrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Arlen Specter [R-PA] introduced S. 2591: A bill to amend chapter 1 of title 17, United States Code, to provide an exemption from exclusive rights in copyright for certain nonprofit organizations to display live football games, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2591"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 2591, A bill to amend chapter 1 of title 17, United States Code ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2591.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-03:/commentary/1580641</id>
    <updated>2008-02-03T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>washingtonwatch.com - Welcome to washingtonwatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 2591 would amend chapter 1 of title 17, United States Code, to provide an exemption from exclusive rights in copyright for certain nonprofit organizations to display live football games.... Vote on This Bill: For | Against.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2591.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
