<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for S.2938 Enhancement of Recruitment, Retention, and Readjustment Through Education Act of 2008</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s2938/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s2938/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-07-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/50310</id>
  <entry>
    <title>vvaw.org</title>
    <link href="http://timjblair.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!B71A619F97F176BD!108996.entry" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-01:/commentary/2423671</id>
    <updated>2008-07-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://timjblair.spaces.live.com Military... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
They fought to the GI Bill changed based on the concept S. 2938, the Enhancement of Recruitment, Retention, and Readjustment through Education Act of 2008. This bill was seen by many as an attempt to derail Webb&amp;#39;s proposal. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://timjblair.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!B71A619F97F176BD!108996.entry"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Democrat John Edwards endorsed former rival Barack Obama on ...</title>
    <link href="http://credit-cards-live.blogspot.com/2008/06/texas-high-court-rules-in-favor-of.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-02:/commentary/2390680</id>
    <updated>2008-06-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>credit cards </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Their bill, S. 2938, would have en&#239;&#191;&#189;hanced the current Montgom&#239;&#191;&#189;ery GI Bill education benefit sharply in the hope of winning the support of more veterans groups and blocking Webb&amp;#39;s package. The surprise 75-22 vote for the Webb plan ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://credit-cards-live.blogspot.com/2008/06/texas-high-court-rules-in-favor-of.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debating the GI Bill -- Update the Existing Benefit, or Replace ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.redstate.com/blogs/jeff_emanuel/2008/jun/02/debating_the_gi_bill_update_the_existing_benefit_or_replace_with_a_new_program_for_a_new_generati" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-02:/commentary/2269663</id>
    <updated>2008-06-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Redstate blogs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Graham-McCain bill, (S.2938 the &#226;&#8364;&#339;Enhancement of Recruitment, Retention, and Readjustment Through Education Act of 2008&#226;&#8364;&#157;), eschews this total overhaul of the GI Bill program specifically for recent enlistees in favor of a simple ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.redstate.com/blogs/jeff_emanuel/2008/jun/02/debating_the_gi_bill_update_the_existing_benefit_or_replace_with_a_new_program_for_a_new_generati"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>McCain, Obama and the GI Bill: Lying by Omission</title>
    <link href="http://sunnyeside.blogspot.com/2008/06/mccain-obama-and-gi-bill-lying-by.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-01:/commentary/2269665</id>
    <updated>2008-06-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Sunnye Side of the Web </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
McCain both opposed the bill, while Obama and his ilk supported it. But look what they did: McCain sponsored S. 2938, the Graham-Burr-McCain Bill, which was intended to expand those benefits in a far more beneficial way.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://sunnyeside.blogspot.com/2008/06/mccain-obama-and-gi-bill-lying-by.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>GI Bill enhancements mount in election-year bidding</title>
    <link href="http://www.progress-index.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=19721446&amp;amp;BRD=2271&amp;amp;PAG=461&amp;amp;dept_id=612178&amp;amp;rfi=6" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-27:/commentary/2280902</id>
    <updated>2008-05-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Progress-indexnews:News:Military </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senate Republicans who support the war in Iraq have sweetened their plan (S. 2938) to enhance the Montgomery GI Bill education benefit in the hope of winning the support of more veterans groups and blocking enactment of a new, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.progress-index.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=19721446&amp;BRD=2271&amp;PAG=461&amp;dept_id=612178&amp;rfi=6"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Actualizando nuestro compromiso con quienes sirven en las fuerzas ...</title>
    <link href="http://hablatn.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/actualizando-nuestro-compromiso-con-quienes-sirven-en-las-fuerzas-armadas/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-26:/commentary/2269666</id>
    <updated>2008-05-26T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>It&amp;#39;s all About Hispanics in Tennessee </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
El Proyecto de Ley de Mejoramiento del Reclutamiento, Retenci&#195;&#179;n y Reajuste a trav&#195;&#169;s de la Educaci&#195;&#179;n, S. 2938, est&#195;&#161; dirigido a dos grupos distintos de miembros del servicio militar &#226;&#8364;&#8220;a aquellos que han terminado su alistamiento, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://hablatn.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/actualizando-nuestro-compromiso-con-quienes-sirven-en-las-fuerzas-armadas/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Truth or Consequences - The Quest for a New GI Bill</title>
    <link href="http://armyofdude.blogspot.com/2008/05/truth-or-consequences-quest-for-new-gi.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-16:/commentary/2269664</id>
    <updated>2008-05-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Army of Dude </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Luckily, only a small number of you were tricked by the introduction of S. 2938, Senator Graham&amp;#39;s pathetic shadow of S. 22. Congratulations for knowing the difference between a bill and an insult! But we need more from you. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://armyofdude.blogspot.com/2008/05/truth-or-consequences-quest-for-new-gi.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cornyn, Colleagues Introduce Bill to Boost Education Benefits for ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.texasinsider.org/modules.php?name=News&amp;amp;file=article&amp;amp;sid=3448" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-01:/commentary/2142139</id>
    <updated>2008-05-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Texas Insider </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Enhancement of Recruitment, Retention, and Readjustment through Education Act, S. 2938, will enhance the existing Montgomery GI Bill to improve benefits for active duty service members, veterans and members of the National Guard and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.texasinsider.org/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=3448"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Isakson, Chambliss Co-Sponsor Legislation to Enhance Education ...</title>
    <link href="http://militarymattersfayette.blogspot.com/2008/05/isakson-chambliss-co-sponsor.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-01:/commentary/2142140</id>
    <updated>2008-05-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Military Matters in Fayette </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Enhancement of Recruitment, Retention, and Readjustment through Education Act, S.2938, would help more military personnel attend college debt-free, and allow them to transfer their education benefits to their spouse or children. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://militarymattersfayette.blogspot.com/2008/05/isakson-chambliss-co-sponsor.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cornyn Co-Sponsors Bill To Boost Education Benefits For Military ...</title>
    <link href="http://cornyn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ForPress.NewsReleases&amp;amp;ContentRecord_id=a06f3929-802a-23ad-44c8-721dc336b836" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-30:/commentary/2134380</id>
    <updated>2008-04-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>United States Senator John Cornyn, Texas </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Enhancement of Recruitment, Retention, and Readjustment through Education Act, S. 2938, will enhance the existing Montgomery GI Bill to improve benefits for active duty service members, veterans and members of the National Guard and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://cornyn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ForPress.NewsReleases&amp;ContentRecord_id=a06f3929-802a-23ad-44c8-721dc336b836"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Action: Introduced: S. 2938: A bill to amend titles 10 and 38 ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2938" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-28:/commentary/2134379</id>
    <updated>2008-04-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Tracked by govtrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Lindsey Graham [R-SC] introduced S. 2938: A bill to amend titles 10 and 38, United States Code, to improve educational assistance for members of the Armed Forces and veterans in order to enhance recruitment and retention for the Armed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2938"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 2938, A bill to amend titles 10 and 38, United States Code, to ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2938.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-28:/commentary/2135602</id>
    <updated>2008-04-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Welcome to WashingtonWatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 2938 would amend titles 10 and 38, United States Code, to improve educational assistance for members of the Armed Forces and veterans in order to enhance recruitment and retention for the Armed Forces. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2938.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
