<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for S.3083 TRADE Act of 2008</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s3083/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s3083/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-11-02T19:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/50976</id>
  <entry>
    <title>wa</title>
    <link href="http://timblair.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!B71A619F97F176BD!141805.entry" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-02:/commentary/3213012</id>
    <updated>2008-11-02T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>TIM BLAIR: NEWS/SPORTS/COMMUNITY BLOG:... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Committee ((360)786-7155) Senate Hearing Rm 3 JA Cherberg Building Olympia, WA Work Session: Examining aspects of S.3083 (Trade Reform, Accountability, Development, and Employment Act of 2008) that impact Washington State interests. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://timblair.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!B71A619F97F176BD!141805.entry&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Administration Wiretap Proposal Hits the Right Issues But Goes Too ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2001/1003terrorism_swire.aspx?rssid=u+s++judiciary" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-02:/commentary/3350479</id>
    <updated>2008-10-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Brookings: Topics - US Judiciary </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Chief of Staff John Podesta announced the proposal in June of 2000, and it was introduced as S. 3083. The House Judiciary Committee considered some of the issues last fall, and almost unanimously approved a bill, H.R. 5018, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2001/1003terrorism_swire.aspx?rssid=u+s++judiciary&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rep. Doyle Thanked for Stand on Fair TRADE</title>
    <link href="http://alleghenysc.org/?p=725" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-13:/commentary/2835590</id>
    <updated>2008-09-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Sierra Club Allegheny Group </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Western Pennsylvania Congressman to co-sponsor the TRADE act. In the Senate a similar TRADE bill, S. 3083, was inctroduced by Senator Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and we are pleased thank Sen. Bob Casey for his co-sponsorship of this bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://alleghenysc.org/?p=725&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NEW POLL: More Than Half of All Oregonians Disapprove of Gordon ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.jeffmerkley.com/2008/09/new_poll_more_t.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-02:/commentary/3350482</id>
    <updated>2008-09-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Jeff Merkley for Senate </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[Senate vote #345, 11/2/99; Senate vote #347, 11/2/99]; Smith has refused to support efforts to reform trade agreements to ensure enforceable labor and environmental standards. [S. 3083]. Posted September 3, 2008 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jeffmerkley.com/2008/09/new_poll_more_t.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New Merkley Ad Takes Aim at Unfair Trade Deals</title>
    <link href="http://www.jeffmerkley.com/2008/09/new_merkley_ad.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-01:/commentary/2828533</id>
    <updated>2008-09-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Jeff Merkley for Senate </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[Senate vote #345, 11/2/99; Senate vote #347, 11/2/99] * Smith has refused to support efforts to reform trade agreements to ensure enforceable labor and environmental standards. [S. 3083] ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jeffmerkley.com/2008/09/new_merkley_ad.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Oregonians Support the TRADE Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.thepetitionsite.com/43/support-the-TRADE-Act" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-22:/commentary/2542054</id>
    <updated>2008-07-22T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>All Petitions - Care2: thepetitionsite </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Trade Reform, Accountability, Development and Employment (TRADE) Act (HR.6180/S.3083) shifts the trade debate in favor of new rules for globalization that will ensure economic security and solid jobs for American workers, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepetitionsite.com/43/support-the-TRADE-Act&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>US Trading Partners Beware: Obama-Democrats Introduce New Euro ...</title>
    <link href="http://itssddisguisedtradebarriers.blogspot.com/2008/06/us-trading-partners-beware-obama.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-08:/commentary/2307204</id>
    <updated>2008-06-08T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ITSSD Journal on Disguised Trade Barriers </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 3083. A bill to require a review of existing trade agreements and renegotiation of existing trade agreements based on the review, to set terms for future trade agreements, to express the sense of the Senate that the role of Congress ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://itssddisguisedtradebarriers.blogspot.com/2008/06/us-trading-partners-beware-obama.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>No Need for a General Election; Obama Already Has Mandate (Cato-at ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2008/06/05/no-need-for-a-general-election-obama-already-has-mandate/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-04:/commentary/3350481</id>
    <updated>2008-06-04T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Cato @ Liberty </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill introduced yesterday (H.R 6180 and its companion S.3083) would slow down the process of approving new trade agreements by requiring the GAO to review existing agreements and judge them not, as logic would seem to dictate, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2008/06/05/no-need-for-a-general-election-obama-already-has-mandate/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Several Trade Items in the News</title>
    <link href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2008/06/05/several-trade-items-in-the-news/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-04:/commentary/2336818</id>
    <updated>2008-06-04T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Shopfloor </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The bill is S. 3083. According to Brown&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s news release, he was joined by other anti-trade members of Congress. Who were also flanked by labor leaders. Meanwhile, the US Treasury announced that the next round of the US-China Strategic ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shopfloor.org/2008/06/05/several-trade-items-in-the-news/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>No Need for a General Election; Obama Already Has Mandate</title>
    <link href="http://thinktankwest.com/2008/06/05/no-need-for-a-general-election-obama-already-has-mandate/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-04:/commentary/2279478</id>
    <updated>2008-06-04T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Think Tank West </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill introduced yesterday (HR 6180 and its companion S.3083) would slow down the process of approving new trade agreements by requiring the GAO to review existing agreements and judge them not, as logic would seem to dictate, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thinktankwest.com/2008/06/05/no-need-for-a-general-election-obama-already-has-mandate/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.3083: TRADE Act of 2008 - U.S. Congress - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s3083/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-03:/commentary/10806821</id>
    <updated>2008-06-03T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.3083 TRADE Act of 2008. - &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s3083/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Action: Introduced: S. 3083: A bill to require a review of ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-3083" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-02:/commentary/3129140</id>
    <updated>2008-06-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Tracked by GovTrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Sherrod Brown [D-OH] introduced S. 3083: A bill to require a review of existing trade agreements and renegotiation of existing trade agreements based on the review, to set terms for future trade agreements, to express the sense of the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-3083&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 3083, A bill to require a review of existing trade agreements ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_3083.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-02:/commentary/2295181</id>
    <updated>2008-06-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Welcome to WashingtonWatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 3083 would require a review of existing trade agreements and renegotiation of existing trade agreements based on the review, it would set terms for future trade agreements, and it would express the sense of the Senate that the role ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_3083.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

