<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for S.3212 Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act of 2008</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s3212/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s3212/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2009-01-03T19:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/51475</id>
  <entry>
    <title>01-04-09 Sen. Salazar: Much Senate Work to Be Done Before January ...</title>
    <link href="http://brianallmerradionetwork.wordpress.com/2009/01/04/01-04-09-sen-salazar-much-senate-work-to-be-done-before-january-20th/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-01-03:/commentary/3910057</id>
    <updated>2009-01-03T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BARN OnAir &amp; OnLine 24/7/365 </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The bills described above passed the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee in the 110th Congress and were included S. 3213, the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2008. S. 3212 was awaiting consideration by the full Senate ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://brianallmerradionetwork.wordpress.com/2009/01/04/01-04-09-sen-salazar-much-senate-work-to-be-done-before-january-20th/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A None Denial,Denial Back From Feinstein..</title>
    <link href="http://marcmaronrules.blogspot.com/2008/08/none-denialdenial-back-from-feinstein.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-28:/commentary/2756543</id>
    <updated>2008-08-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>marcmaronrules </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On June 26, 2008, I introduced the &quot;Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act of 2008&quot; (S. 3212) with Senator Robert F. Bennett (R-UT). This bill would help ensure the accuracy of future federal elections by requiring that electronic ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://marcmaronrules.blogspot.com/2008/08/none-denialdenial-back-from-feinstein.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Call your two US Senators to vote NO on flawed voting reform bill ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.allthingsreform.org/2008/08/call-your-two-us-senators-to-vote-no-on.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-11:/commentary/2661033</id>
    <updated>2008-08-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>All Things Reform </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Government reform orgs. deliver news on major events within their areas of expertise. From: VoteTrustUSA VoteTrustUSA is urging citizens and the US Senate to oppose passage of S.3212, the Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.allthingsreform.org/2008/08/call-your-two-us-senators-to-vote-no-on.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>VoteTrustUSA - Voter Action's Statement in Opposition to S. 3212</title>
    <link href="http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=2918&amp;amp;Itemid=26" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-08:/commentary/3373517</id>
    <updated>2008-08-08T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>VoteTrustUSA </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.3212 ignores these expensive lessons and would allocate millions more of taxpayer dollars for the continued use of DRE machines, amounting to a public boondoggle for the private companies that have marketed these flawed voting systems ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=2918&amp;amp;Itemid=26&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>USACM Technology Policy Weblog</title>
    <link href="http://usacm.acm.org/usacm/weblog/index.php?p=628" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-07:/commentary/3340823</id>
    <updated>2008-08-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ACM's Tech Policy Weblog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Feinstein (D-CA) recently introduced a new voting bill, S. 3212, the Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act of 2008. This latest effort to reform electronic voting processes and equipment is similar and different from the House ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://usacm.acm.org/usacm/weblog/index.php?p=628&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>USACM Technology Policy Weblog</title>
    <link href="http://www.acm.org/usacm/weblog/index.php?p=628" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-05:/commentary/3897525</id>
    <updated>2008-08-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ACM's Tech Policy Weblog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Feinstein (D-CA) recently introduced a new voting bill, S. 3212, the Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act of 2008. This latest effort to reform electronic voting processes and equipment is similar and different from the House ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.acm.org/usacm/weblog/index.php?p=628&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&amp;#39;Daily Voting News&amp;#39; For August 02 and 03, 2008</title>
    <link href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0808/S00034.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-03:/commentary/2605473</id>
    <updated>2008-08-03T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Scoop NZ - Scoops </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Our featured article today is an editorial from the New York Times who have correctly labeled the Feinstein-Bennett Bill, S.3212, as a BAD electronic voting bill. In their opening graf the Times Editorial Board says, &#226;&#8364;&#339;Congress has stood ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0808/S00034.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>'Daily Voting News' For August 02 and 03, 2008</title>
    <link href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6243" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-03:/commentary/2605475</id>
    <updated>2008-08-03T19:50:45Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The BRAD BLOG</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Our featured article today is an editorial from the New York Times who have correctly labeled the Feinstein-Bennett Bill, &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.3212&lt;/strong&gt;, as a BAD electronic voting bill. In their opening graf the Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6243&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NY Times Editorial: &amp;#39;Voters cannot trust the totals reported by ...</title>
    <link href="http://mparent7777-1.livejournal.com/1128913.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-02:/commentary/2605474</id>
    <updated>2008-08-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CRIMES AND CORRUPTIONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER NEWS </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
An election reform bill (S. 3212) sponsored by Democratic California Senator Dianne Feinsten and Republican Senator Robert Bennett of Utah was panned by the New York Times this morning in an editorial. The Times says election reform is ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mparent7777-1.livejournal.com/1128913.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Why Tuesday? &#194;&#187; Blog Archive &#194;&#187; NYT Rips Voting Machine Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.whytuesday.org/2008/08/03/nyt-rips-voting-machine-bill/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-01:/commentary/3340829</id>
    <updated>2008-08-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Why Tuesday? </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
An election reform bill (S. 3212) sponsored by Democratic California Senator Dianne Feinsten and Republican Senator Robert Bennett of Utah was panned by the New York Times this morning in an editorial. The Times says election reform is ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whytuesday.org/2008/08/03/nyt-rips-voting-machine-bill/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AAPD&amp;#39;s Jim Dickson Testifies in Support of Voting Reform Act</title>
    <link href="http://jfactivist.typepad.com/jfactivist/2008/08/aapds-jim-dicks.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-30:/commentary/2589891</id>
    <updated>2008-07-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>JFActivist </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
American Association of People with Disabilities (AAPD) Vice President of Governmental Affairs Jim Dickson on Wednesday testified in front of the Senate Rules Committee in support of S.3212 the Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://jfactivist.typepad.com/jfactivist/2008/08/aapds-jim-dicks.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Daily Voting News For July 30, 2008</title>
    <link href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0807/S00359.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-30:/commentary/2584513</id>
    <updated>2008-07-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Scoop NZ - Top Scoops Most Read </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In today&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s &#226;&#8364;&#339;Featured&#226;&#8364;* article, Voter Action had this to say in opposition to S.3212, &#226;&#8364;&#339;The United States Congress should be investigating, not financing, the private companies that have sold the DRE systems to states and counties ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0807/S00359.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>'Daily Voting News' For July 30, 2008</title>
    <link href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6232" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-30:/commentary/2584178</id>
    <updated>2008-07-30T19:19:25Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The BRAD BLOG</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 In today&#8217;s &#8220;Featured&#8221; article, Voter Action had this to say in opposition to S ...  on Congress to defeat &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.3212&lt;/strong&gt; and any other legislation that &#8220;funds and encourages the continued use&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6232&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Verified Voting.org Warns New Feinstein/Bennett Legislation Is ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.infozine.com/news/stories/op/storiesView/sid/29609/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-29:/commentary/3784329</id>
    <updated>2008-07-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kansas City infoZine National Headlines </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Today the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration held a hearing on the bill, S.3212. &quot;The show-stoppers in this bill unfortunately overshadow its positive provisions,&quot; said Verified Voting president Pamela Smith. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infozine.com/news/stories/op/storiesView/sid/29609/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bipartisan Bill Would Promote Innovation in Reliable, Transparent ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/07/bipartisan-bill-would-promote-innovation-in-reliable-transparent-voting-technology/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-29:/commentary/3340830</id>
    <updated>2008-07-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Science Progress </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators Diane Feinstein (D-CA) and Bob Burnett (R- UT), Chairwoman and Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration, presented the Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act of 2008 (S.3212) yesterday, a negotiated ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/07/bipartisan-bill-would-promote-innovation-in-reliable-transparent-voting-technology/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sarah Granger: Voting Machine Debacles Continue As Election Nears</title>
    <link href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sarah-granger/voting-machine-debacles-c_b_115757.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-29:/commentary/2581630</id>
    <updated>2008-07-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Huffington Post Full Blog Feed </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act, S. 3212, being reviewed in the Senate Rules Committee hearing today, attempts to close some of the loopholes in the voting process, covering states that are not currently protected by their ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sarah-granger/voting-machine-debacles-c_b_115757.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Voter Action&amp;#39;s Statement in Opposition to S. 3212</title>
    <link href="http://votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=2918&amp;amp;Itemid=26" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-29:/commentary/2581629</id>
    <updated>2008-07-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>VoteTrustUSA </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senate Bill Would Sanction the Continued USe of Electronic Voting MachinesDespite overwhelming evidence which demonstrates that the use of electronic voting...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=2918&amp;amp;Itemid=26&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Step Backward For Voting System Transparency</title>
    <link href="http://www.privacydigest.com/2008/07/30/step+backward+voting+system+transparency" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-29:/commentary/2576557</id>
    <updated>2008-07-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Privacy Digest - News that can impact your... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Verified Voting is reporting that Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Senator Robert Bennett (R-UT) introduced the Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act (S. 3212). While having many commendable features, this bill also has a few ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.privacydigest.com/2008/07/30/step+backward+voting+system+transparency&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>'Daily Voting News' For July 29, 2008</title>
    <link href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6230" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-29:/commentary/2576559</id>
    <updated>2008-07-29T19:46:20Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The BRAD BLOG</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.3212&lt;/strong&gt; is BAD legislation. The bill will be heard by the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration tomorrow at 10AM Eastern ...  them NO on &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.3212&lt;/strong&gt;. See VerifiedVoting.Org for more detail&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6230&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Election Law: &quot;Redistricting Must Be Fixed Before Census&quot;</title>
    <link href="http://electionlawblog.org/archives/011284.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-28:/commentary/3580738</id>
    <updated>2008-07-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Election Law </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... and the Supreme Court nomination process. Rick Hasen's web log. &#194;&#171; &quot;FEC Rejects Club's Bid to Tweak Disclosure Rules&quot; | Main | Senate Rules Committee Hearing Wednesday on S. 3212, the Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act of 2008 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://electionlawblog.org/archives/011284.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Election Law: &quot;Already Too Late to Act on 'Bundling' Rule ...</title>
    <link href="http://electionlawblog.org/archives/011286.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-28:/commentary/3467661</id>
    <updated>2008-07-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Election Law </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... and the Supreme Court nomination process Rick Hasen's web log. &#194;&#171; Senate Rules Committee Hearing Wednesday on S. 3212, the Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act of 2008 | Main | Eighth Circuit Decides Missouri NVRA Appeal &#194;&#187; ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://electionlawblog.org/archives/011286.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ACLU Blog: Because Freedom Can&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t Blog Itself: Official Blog of the ...</title>
    <link href="http://blog.aclu.org/2008/07/29/this-week-on-the-hill-72808-8108/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-28:/commentary/3340828</id>
    <updated>2008-07-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ACLU Blog: Because Freedom Can't Blog Itself:... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Electronic Voting Senate Rules and Administration Committee will hold a hearing on S. 3212, which would amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to provide for auditable, independent verification of ballots. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.aclu.org/2008/07/29/this-week-on-the-hill-72808-8108/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ACSBlog: The Blog of the American Constitution Society ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.acsblog.org/news-and-announcements-congressional-activities-week-of-july-28-2008.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-28:/commentary/3340826</id>
    <updated>2008-07-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ACSBlog: The Blog of the American Constitution... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senate Committee on Rules and Administration hearing on S. 3212, the Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act of 2008. Thursday, July 31, 2008. House Committee on Armed Services to hear testimony on Implications of the Supreme Court&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.acsblog.org/news-and-announcements-congressional-activities-week-of-july-28-2008.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Step Backward for Voting System Transparency Pamela Smith writes ...</title>
    <link href="http://communitybridge.blogspot.com/2008/07/step-backward-for-voting-system.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-28:/commentary/3123954</id>
    <updated>2008-07-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Community Bridge Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The press release accompanying the introduction of S. 3212 observes, 'the ability to ensure there is an accurate, reliable and transparent method for Americans to cast and count votes is fundamental to our democratic process. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://communitybridge.blogspot.com/2008/07/step-backward-for-voting-system.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Step Backward For Voting System Transparency</title>
    <link href="http://www.techblogger.org/2008/07/29/a-step-backward-for-voting-system-transparency/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-28:/commentary/2645756</id>
    <updated>2008-07-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>techblogger </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Verified Voting is reporting that Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Senator Robert Bennett (R-UT) introduced the Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act (S. 3212). While having many commendable features, this bill also has a few ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techblogger.org/2008/07/29/a-step-backward-for-voting-system-transparency/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Contact Congress About Verified Voting</title>
    <link href="http://www.blogforiowa.com/blog/_archives/2008/7/29/3814948.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-28:/commentary/2645755</id>
    <updated>2008-07-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Blog for Iowa </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This Wednesday, the US Senate will hold hearings on S.3212, a bill aimed at providing independent verification of ballots cast on electronic voting machines. That&amp;#39;s a laudable goal, but S.3212 gets it wrong - very wrong. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogforiowa.com/blog/_archives/2008/7/29/3814948.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senatorial Confusion...</title>
    <link href="http://gnulinuxguy.blogspot.com/2008/07/senatorial-confusion.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-28:/commentary/2576558</id>
    <updated>2008-07-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>gnulinuxguy </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I went to Senator Hatch&amp;#39;s site, in order to voice my complaint about a hearing scheduled tomorrow morning for S. 3212, the &amp;quot;Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act of 2008&amp;quot; [1], when I saw a press release: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gnulinuxguy.blogspot.com/2008/07/senatorial-confusion.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act (S. 3212) is flawed</title>
    <link href="http://digg.com/politics/Bipartisan_Electronic_Voting_Reform_Act_S_3212_is_flawed" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-28:/commentary/2576556</id>
    <updated>2008-07-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Digg / World &amp;amp; Business / upcoming </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Sen. D. Feinstein (D-CA) and Sen. R. Bennett (R-UT) introduced the Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act this week - it&amp;#39;s a good start, but it&amp;#39;s FLAWED in ten ways, listed at this website. Go read and make up your own mind. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://digg.com/politics/Bipartisan_Electronic_Voting_Reform_Act_S_3212_is_flawed&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Rules Committee Hearing Wednesday on S. 3212, the ...</title>
    <link href="http://electionlawblog.org/archives/011285.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-28:/commentary/2576555</id>
    <updated>2008-07-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Election Law </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Details here....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://electionlawblog.org/archives/011285.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Action Alert: Tell your Senators to vote NO on S. 3212</title>
    <link href="http://votingmatters.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/action-alert-tell-your-senators-to-vote-no-on-s-3212/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-28:/commentary/2569364</id>
    <updated>2008-07-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Voting Matters Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This Wednesday, the US Senate will hold hearings on S.3212, a bill aimed at providing independent verification of ballots cast on electronic voting machines. That&#226;&#8364;&#8482;sa laudable goal, but S.3212 gets it wrong - very wrong. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://votingmatters.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/action-alert-tell-your-senators-to-vote-no-on-s-3212/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>'Daily Voting News' For July 27 and 28, 2008</title>
    <link href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6223" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-28:/commentary/2569367</id>
    <updated>2008-07-28T19:18:20Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The BRAD BLOG</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 As reported in today&#8217;s &#8220;Featured&#8221; article problems encountered during New York State&#8217;s tough certification testing have caused the timeline for the ...  Elections and Oppose &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.3212&lt;/strong&gt;  http://www.opednews.com/...-the-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6223&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Action Alerts</title>
    <link href="http://quinnell.us/sspb/?p=2020" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-27:/commentary/2564541</id>
    <updated>2008-07-27T23:40:57Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Florida Progressive Coalition Blog: </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Send an e-mail: Drilling in Sensitive Areas (TWS)  Send an e-mail: &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.3212&lt;/strong&gt;: A Step Backward for Voting System Transparency (VV)  Send an e-mail: Urge Senate to Recognize Suffragist Alice Paul&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://quinnell.us/sspb/?p=2020&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congresspedia Preview: This Week in Congress (July 27 - Aug. 2 ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.prwatch.org/node/7599" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-27:/commentary/3373518</id>
    <updated>2008-07-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conor Kenny's blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Hearings to examine S.3212, to amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to provide for auditable, independent verification of ballots, to ensure the security of voting systems. SR-301, 10:00 am; Senate Committee on Small Business and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prwatch.org/node/7599&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Leg Alert: Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act of 2008 [S. 3212]</title>
    <link href="http://blog.electiontechnology.com/?p=132" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-27:/commentary/2581631</id>
    <updated>2008-07-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Election Technology Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:00 am SR-301, Russell Senate Office Building. Witness list after the jump, post will be updated if webcast becomes available. Honorable Todd Rokita Past-President, National Association of Secretaries of State ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.electiontechnology.com/?p=132&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Hill Tech Happenings, Week of July 28</title>
    <link href="http://www.acm.org/usacm/weblog/index.php?p=625" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-27:/commentary/2569366</id>
    <updated>2008-07-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>acm&amp;#39;s Tech Policy Weblog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate Rules and Administration Committee will hold a hearing on S. 3212, the Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act of 2008. 10 am, 301 Russell Building. July 31 Hearing: The Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.acm.org/usacm/weblog/index.php?p=625&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>*URGENT ACTION NEEDED* -- &amp;quot;Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/7/28/112330/394" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-27:/commentary/2569365</id>
    <updated>2008-07-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Kos </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
If you care about the integrity of the electoral process, I need you to (1) rec this diary to the top and (2) contact your Senator today or tomorrow regarding Bill S.3212, the &amp;quot;Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act of 2008&amp;quot; introduced ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/7/28/112330/394&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Action Alert: Tell your Senators to Support Transparent Elections ...</title>
    <link href="http://queerisntit.blogspot.com/2008/07/action-alert-tell-your-senators-to.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-27:/commentary/2564540</id>
    <updated>2008-07-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>QUEER, Isn&amp;#39;t it? </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.3212, introduced by Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Senator Robert Bennett (R-UT), would allow electronic &amp;quot;verification&amp;quot; records for electronic voting machines, would allow meaningless audits of federal election results, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://queerisntit.blogspot.com/2008/07/action-alert-tell-your-senators-to.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Action Alerts</title>
    <link href="http://floridaspeaks.blogspot.com/2008/07/action-alerts_27.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-26:/commentary/2564539</id>
    <updated>2008-07-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Florida Speaks </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Send an e-mail: S.3212: A Step Backward for Voting System Transparency (VV) Send an e-mail: Urge Senate to Recognize Suffragist Alice Paul with a Congressional Gold Medal (NOW) Send an e-mail: Why does the US keep poisoning our children ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://floridaspeaks.blogspot.com/2008/07/action-alerts_27.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Action Alert: Tell your Senators to Support Transparent Elections ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/Action-Alert--Tell-your-Se-by-the-web-080727-555.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-26:/commentary/2564538</id>
    <updated>2008-07-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>OpEdNews - OpEdNews.Com Progressive, Tough... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[S.3212 would allow electronic &amp;quot;verification&amp;quot; of votes cast on electronic voting machines. If S.3212 becomes law, elections in many states would still depend on the trustworthiness of computer software. This bill also fails to require ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opednews.com/articles/Action-Alert--Tell-your-Se-by-the-web-080727-555.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rigged 2008 presidential election?</title>
    <link href="http://compostwormbin.livejournal.com/274591.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-26:/commentary/2564537</id>
    <updated>2008-07-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bad Worma </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This Wednesday, the US Senate will hold hearings on S.3212, a bill aimed at providing independent verification of ballots cast on electronic voting machines. That&amp;#39;s a laudable goal, but S.3212 gets it wrong - very wrong. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://compostwormbin.livejournal.com/274591.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>'Daily Voting News' For July 26, 2008</title>
    <link href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6219" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-26:/commentary/2561301</id>
    <updated>2008-07-26T19:01:27Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The BRAD BLOG</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &#8220;On June 26, 2008, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Senator Robert Bennett (R-UT) introduced the Bipartisan Electronic Voting Reform Act (S. 3212) ...  to our democratic process.&#8221; Unfortunately, &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.3212&lt;/strong&gt; falls far sho&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6219&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>VoteTrustUSA - S. 3212: A Step Backward for Voting System Transparency</title>
    <link href="http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=2916&amp;amp;Itemid=26" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-25:/commentary/3467658</id>
    <updated>2008-07-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>VoteTrustUSA </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 3212 would not require the EAC to adopt model audit guidelines for jurisdictions that use paper ballot optical scan technology (now the most common voting system in the United States) nor would it require optical scan paper ballots ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=2916&amp;amp;Itemid=26&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 3212: A Step Backward for Voting System Transparency</title>
    <link href="http://votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=2916&amp;amp;Itemid=26" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-23:/commentary/3123958</id>
    <updated>2008-07-23T13:52:50Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>VoteTrustUSA - Home</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 S. 3212: A Step Backward for Voting System Transparency         New from National Issues -   Federal Legislation       By Verified Voting Foundation ...  to cast and count votes is fundamental to our democratic process.&#8221; Unfortunately, &lt;strong class=&quot;key&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=2916&amp;amp;Itemid=26&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Introduced Bill: S.3212</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s3212/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-24:/commentary/2417495</id>
    <updated>2008-06-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Open Congress : Sen. Dianne Feinstein [D, CA] </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill to amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to provide for auditable, independent verification of ballots, to ensure the security of voting systems, and for other purposes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s3212/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Action: Introduced: S. 3212: A bill to amend the Help America ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-3212" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-24:/commentary/2417494</id>
    <updated>2008-06-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Tracked by govtrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Dianne Feinstein [D-CA] introduced S. 3212: A bill to amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to provide for auditable, independent verification of ballots, to ensure the security of voting systems, and for other purposes. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-3212&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 3212, A bill to amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_3212.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-24:/commentary/2417493</id>
    <updated>2008-06-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>washingtonwatch.com - Welcome to washingtonwatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 3212 would amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to provide for auditable, independent verification of ballots, and to ensure the security of voting systems.... Vote on This Bill: For | Against.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_3212.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

