The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowS.3219 - Senior Investor Protections Enhancement Act of 2008
A bill to enhance penalties for violations of securities protections that involve targeting seniors.

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
S 3219 ISCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
110th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
2d SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
S. 3219CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To enhance penalties for violations of securities protections that involve targeting seniors.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
June 27, 2008CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Mr. CASEY (for himself and Mr. KOHL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban AffairsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To enhance penalties for violations of securities protections that involve targeting seniors.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘Senior Investor Protections Enhancement Act of 2008’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act, the following definitions shall apply:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) SENIOR- The term ‘senior’ means an individual who is 62 years of age or older.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) SECURITIES LAWS- The term ‘securities laws’ means the Securities Act of 1933 (
SEC. 3. ENHANCED PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF SECURITIES ACT OF 1933.
(a) Civil Actions- Section 20(d)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (
‘(D) SPECIAL RULE FOR SENIORS- Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), the amount of penalty for each violation described in paragraph (1) that may be imposed under subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) may be increased by not more than $50,000, if the violation is primarily directed toward, targets, or is committed against an individual who, at the time of the violation, is 62 years of age or older.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Other Violations- Section 24 of the Securities Act of 1933 (
(1) by inserting ‘(a) In General- ’ before ‘Any person’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) by adding at the end the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(b) Special Rule for Seniors- Notwithstanding subsection (a), the amount of a fine that may be imposed under subsection (a) may be increased by not more than $50,000, if the violation is primarily directed toward, targets, or is committed against an individual who, at the time of the violation, is 62 years of age or older.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 4. ENHANCED PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF SECURITIES ACT OF 1934.
(a) Civil Actions- Section 21(d)(3)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (
‘(iv) SPECIAL RULE FOR SENIORS- Notwithstanding clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), the amount of penalty for each violation described in subparagraph (A) that may be imposed under clause (i), (ii), or (iii) may be increased by not more than $50,000, if the violation is primarily directed toward, targets, or is committed against an individual who, at the time of the violation, is 62 years of age or older.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Willful Violations- Section 21B(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (
‘(4) SPECIAL RULE FOR SENIORS- Notwithstanding paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), the amount of penalty for each violation described in subsection (a) that may be imposed under paragraph (1), (2), or (3) may be increased by not more than $50,000, if the violation is primarily directed toward, targets, or is committed against an individual who, at the time of the violation, is 62 years of age or older.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Other Violations- Section 32 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (
‘(d) Special Rule for Seniors- Notwithstanding subsection (a), the amount of fine that may be imposed under subsection (a) may be increased by not more than $50,000, if the violation is primarily directed toward, targets, or is committed against an individual who, at the time of the violation, is 62 years of age or older.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 5. ENHANCED PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940.
(a) Willful Violations- Section 9(d)(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (
‘(D) SPECIAL RULE FOR SENIORS- Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), the amount of penalty for each violation described in paragraph (1) that may be imposed under subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) may be increased by not more than $50,000, if the violation is primarily directed toward, targets, or is committed against an individual who, at the time of the violation, is 62 years of age or older.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Civil Actions- Section 42(e)(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (
‘(D) SPECIAL RULE FOR SENIORS- Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), the amount of penalty for each violation described in paragraph (1) that may be imposed under subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) may be increased by not more than $50,000, if the violation is primarily directed toward, targets, or is committed against an individual who, at the time of the violation, is 62 years of age or older.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Other Violations- Section 49 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (
(1) by inserting ‘(a) In General- ’ before ‘Any person’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) by adding at the end the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(b) Special Rule for Seniors- Notwithstanding subsection (a), the amount of fine that may be imposed under subsection (a) may be increased by not more than $50,000, if the violation is primarily directed toward, targets, or is committed against an individual who, at the time of the violation, is 62 years of age or older.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 6. ENHANCED PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940.
(a) Willful Violations- Section 203(i)(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (
‘(D) SPECIAL RULE FOR SENIORS- Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), the amount of penalty for each violation described in paragraph (1) that may be imposed under subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) may be increased by not more than $50,000, if the violation is primarily directed toward, targets, or is committed against an individual who, at the time of the violation, is 62 years of age or older.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Civil Actions- Section 209(e)(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (
‘(D) SPECIAL RULE FOR SENIORS- Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), the amount of penalty for each violation under this title that may be imposed under subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) may be increased by not more than $50,000, if the violation is primarily directed toward, targets, or is committed against an individual who, at the time of the violation, is 62 years of age or older.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Other Violations- Section 217 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (
(1) by inserting ‘(a) In General- ’ before ‘Any person’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) by adding at the end the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(b) Special Rule for Seniors- Notwithstanding subsection (a), the amount of fine that may be imposed under subsection (a) may be increased by not more than $50,000, if the violation is primarily directed toward, targets, or is committed against an individual who, at the time of the violation, is 62 years of age or older.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 7. DIRECTIVE TO THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION.
(a) In General- Pursuant to its authority under
(b) Requirements- In carrying out this section, the United States Sentencing Commission shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) ensure that section 2B1.1 and 2C1.1 of the Federal sentencing guidelines (and any successors thereto) apply to and punish offenses in which the victim of a violation of the securities laws is a senior;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) ensure reasonable consistency with other relevant directives, provisions of the Federal sentencing guidelines, and statutory provisions;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) make any necessary and conforming changes to the Federal sentencing guidelines, in accordance with the amendments made by this Act; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) ensure that the Federal sentencing guidelines adequately meet the purposes of sentencing set forth in
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
OC Blog Articles Related To This Bill
Recent OC Blog Articles
- Yes, let's stride towards an open VCS for legislation (or, GitHub for laws on OC) May 23, 2012
- Contact Congress Today to #FreeTHOMAS May 17, 2012
- Yochai Benkler: Blueprint for Democratic Participation May 10, 2012
- New NDAA Would Give the Military Clandestine Cyberwar Powers May 08, 2012
- The Week Ahead in Congress May 07, 2012

U.S. Congress - Text of S.3219 as Introduced in Senate Senior Investor Protections Enhancement Act of 2008



