<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for S.3398 Medical Device Safety Act of 2008</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s3398/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s3398/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2010-04-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/52268</id>
  <entry>
    <title>H.R.5120: Veteran Employment Assistance Act of 2010 - U.S. ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h5120/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-04-20:/commentary/10620221</id>
    <updated>2010-04-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Secure Jobs for Our Nation&amp;#39;s Heroes, H.R. 5120, H.R. 5400, S. 2334, S. 3398 (Stuck in committee). Streamline and Simplify the Post-9/11 GI Bill, H.R.5933, S. 3447 (Stuck in committee). Support Better Health Care for Female Veterans ... Source: Bluestem&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h5120/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.3234: Veteran Employment Assistance Act of 2010 - U.S. Congress ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s3234/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-04-18:/commentary/10620220</id>
    <updated>2010-04-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Co-sponsorship of S. 3234 (Veterans Employment, 17 cosponsors) and S. 3398 (Veterans Employment, 12 cosponsors). Again, both good bills, both sent to committee with no action. Ok, now, in fairness to IAVA, here is why they say they ... Source: This ain&amp;#39&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s3234/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Saundersblog.com - Medical Device Preemption Gets a Second Look</title>
    <link href="http://www.saundersblog.com/2009/01/medical_device_preemption_gets.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-01-04:/commentary/3914098</id>
    <updated>2009-01-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Saundersblog.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Medical Device Safety Act of 2008, H.R. 6381-S.3398-is a proposed amendment to the Medical Device Amendment to the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act. The proposed bill reads as such,. SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saundersblog.com/2009/01/medical_device_preemption_gets.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PointofLaw.com | PointOfLaw Forum: Trial lawyer lobbying: Let the ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/11/trial-lawyer-lo.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-25:/commentary/3481786</id>
    <updated>2008-11-25T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PointOfLaw Forum </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
H.R. 6381/S. 3398 (Medical Device Safety Act); to amend the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act to clarify the scope of federal preemption of state law with regard to medical devices. &#226;&#8364;&#162; Congressional lobbying in response to proposed FDA rule ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/11/trial-lawyer-lo.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Could Obama end FDA preemption by executive order?</title>
    <link href="http://blog.prescriptionaccess.org/?p=395" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-12:/commentary/3304160</id>
    <updated>2008-11-12T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Prescription Access Litigation (PAL) Project </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(HR6381 and S.3398). It is virtually certain that a similar bill will be filed if and when the Supreme Court decides in Wyeth&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s favor. An Executive Order also arguably wouldn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t do anything to affect the preemptive effect of the FDA&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.prescriptionaccess.org/?p=395&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>OpenCongress - U.S. Congress - S.3398 Medical Device Safety Act of ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s3398/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-31:/commentary/3772839</id>
    <updated>2008-08-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Open Congress : Major Bill Actions in Medical... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.3398 Medical Device Safety Act of 2008 on OpenCongress.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s3398/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PointofLaw.com | PointOfLaw Forum: Preemption, the Congressional ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/08/preemption-the.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-11:/commentary/3340310</id>
    <updated>2008-08-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PointOfLaw Forum </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Kennedy (D-MA) as S. 3398. You could almost hear the American Association for Justice shouting &quot;Bingo!&quot; More on Medtronic and preemption here. Posted by Carter Wood at 12:19 PM | TrackBack (0) ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/08/preemption-the.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PointofLaw.com | PointOfLaw Forum: Putting the boot to preemption</title>
    <link href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/08/putting-the-boo.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-03:/commentary/3519336</id>
    <updated>2008-08-03T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PointOfLaw Forum </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Acting on behalf of the ailing Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA), Sen. Pat Leahy (D-VT) on July 31 introduced legislation to overturn the US Supreme Court decision in Riegel v. Medtronic, the Medical Device Safety Act of 2008, S. 3398. The...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/08/putting-the-boo.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WashingtonWatch.com - S. 3398, The Medical Device Safety Act of 2008</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/200512247.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-01:/commentary/3595332</id>
    <updated>2008-08-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for HR 6562,... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
US Congress: S. 3398, The Medical Device Safety Act of 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/200512247.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WashingtonWatch.com - S. 3398, The Medical Device Safety Act of 2008</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_3398.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-31:/commentary/3340308</id>
    <updated>2008-07-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Welcome to WashingtonWatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
US Congress: S. 3398, The Medical Device Safety Act of 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_3398.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

