<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for S.344 A bill to permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings.</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s344/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s344/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-11-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/40438</id>
  <entry>
    <title>&#195;&#339;ber Wissenschaft und Religion</title>
    <link href="http://fjordman.wordpress.com/2008/11/07/uber-wissenschaft-und-religion/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-06:/commentary/3237810</id>
    <updated>2008-11-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Counterdjihad </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Huff stimmt in seinem ausgezeichneten Buch mit Grants Einsch&#195;&#164;tzung der Wichtigkeit des Universit&#195;&#164;tssystems &#195;&#188;berein (S. 344): &#226;&#8364;&#339;Eine sachliche Untersuchung des Bildungshintergrundes der bedeutenden Wissenschaftler des 15. bis 17. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://fjordman.wordpress.com/2008/11/07/uber-wissenschaft-und-religion/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IP|Expertennotizen: Die Werkvernichtung</title>
    <link href="http://www.ip-notiz.de/ipexpertennotizen-die-werkvernichtung/2008/10/22/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-22:/commentary/3072140</id>
    <updated>2008-10-22T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IP|Notiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[54]Larenz, Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, S. 344. [55]Damit ist ein direkter R&#195;&#188;ckgriff auf die Verfassung nicht m&#195;&#182;glich, weil die Voraussetzungen hierf&#195;&#188;r nicht vorliegen. Denn auch die Wahrnehmung eines verfassungsrechtlichen ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ip-notiz.de/ipexpertennotizen-die-werkvernichtung/2008/10/22/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IP|Expertennotizen: Die Werkvernichtung</title>
    <link href="http://www.ip-notiz.de/ipexpertennotizen-die-werkvernichtung/2008/09/17/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-17:/commentary/2844407</id>
    <updated>2008-09-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IP|Notiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[54] Larenz, Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, S. 344. [55] Damit ist ein direkter R&#195;&#188;ckgriff auf die Verfassung nicht m&#195;&#182;glich, weil die Voraussetzungen hierf&#195;&#188;r nicht vorliegen. Denn auch die Wahrnehmung eines verfassungsrechtlichen ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ip-notiz.de/ipexpertennotizen-die-werkvernichtung/2008/09/17/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ArchG-ProfE (3): Zugriff auf privates Archivgut</title>
    <link href="http://deu.i-iter.org/content/archg-profe-3-zugriff-auf-privates-archivgut" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-08:/commentary/2165826</id>
    <updated>2008-04-08T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>i-iter - </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&#195;&#339;bersehen haben die Autoren offenkundig die - wie ein Fremdk&#195;&#182;rper anmutende - denkmalschutzrechtliche Regelung des &#194;&#167; 13 RLP-Archivgesetzes (S. 344 als &#195;&#8222;nderung des Denkmalschutzgesetzes bezeichnenderweise nicht abgedruckt, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://deu.i-iter.org/content/archg-profe-3-zugriff-auf-privates-archivgut"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Radical Attack</title>
    <link href="http://sexy-courtney-cox.blogspot.com/2008/03/radical-attack.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-21:/commentary/1937748</id>
    <updated>2008-03-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Courtney Cox </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Human Rights Campaign - Justice for All. The Radical: Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) The Attack: Senator Specter introduced S. 344, a bill that would require the Supreme Court to televise its &#195;&#162;&#226;&#8218;&#172;&#197;&#8220;open proceedings.&#195;&#162;&#226;&#8218;&#172; The . ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://sexy-courtney-cox.blogspot.com/2008/03/radical-attack.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Zur Rechtfertigung des Optimismus</title>
    <link href="http://aufheben.blogsport.de/2008/01/04/9/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-03:/commentary/1424214</id>
    <updated>2008-01-03T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>aufheben </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[zur&#195;&#188;ck]; Marx, Karl: Briefe aus den Deutsch-Franz&#195;&#182;sischen Jahrb&#195;&#188;chern (=MEW Bd.1, S.344). [zur&#195;&#188;ck]; Deleuze, Gilles: Postskriptum &#195;&#188;ber die Kontrollgesellschaften (http://www.nadir.org/nadir/archiv/netzkritik/postskriptum.html _ ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://aufheben.blogsport.de/2008/01/04/9/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 344, A bill to permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings</title>
    <link href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdoc.cfm?index=8905&amp;amp;type=1" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-20:/commentary/1390325</id>
    <updated>2007-12-20T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Recent CBO Cost Estimates </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the Senate Committee on the Judiciary on December 6, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdoc.cfm?index=8905&amp;type=1"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Selected Congressional Hearings: Week of 12/03/2007</title>
    <link href="http://mynetbiz-online.com/america/?p=9192" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-03:/commentary/1385504</id>
    <updated>2007-12-03T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>America </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senate Judiciary Business meeting to consider: S.352, Sunshine in the Courtroom Act of 2007; S.344, A bill to permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings: S.1638, Federal Judicial Salary Restoration Act of 2007; S.1829, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://mynetbiz-online.com/america/?p=9192"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ein Verf&#195;&#164;lscher am Werk - Replik auf Ralf Molkenthins Kritik</title>
    <link href="http://www.fantomzeit.de/?p=182" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-11-01:/commentary/1321484</id>
    <updated>2007-11-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Fantomzeit </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Hochdruck daran arbeiten, fast mit Gewalt Architektur&#195;&#188;berreste und Steinfragmente zu karolingisieren, w&#195;&#164;hrend die Streichung eines Begriffs wie &#226;&#8364;&#382;karolingisches Westwerk&#226;&#8364;&#339; durch Dagmar von Sch&#195;&#182;nfeld de Reyes (S. 344) ignoriert wird. ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.fantomzeit.de/?p=182"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Zw&#228;nge Furcht Kontraste Technik tz-03</title>
    <link href="http://transitenator.blogspot.com/2007/07/zwnge-furcht-kontraste-technik-tz-03.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-11:/commentary/822103</id>
    <updated>2007-07-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>transitenator </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Was wir als &amp;#39;Ausbreitung der Zivilisation&amp;#39; bezeichnen sind die bisher letzten Wellen einer jahrhundertelangen Bewegung, deren charakteristische Figuren sich hier durchsetzen (S. 344). Der Verlauf aller dieser Expansionen ist nur zu ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://transitenator.blogspot.com/2007/07/zwnge-furcht-kontraste-technik-tz-03.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Michigan Symposium on TV in the US Supreme Court</title>
    <link href="http://micheladrien.blogspot.com/2007/06/michigan-symposium-on-tv-in-us-supreme.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-23:/commentary/822100</id>
    <updated>2007-06-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Library Boy </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&amp;quot;Senator Arlen Specter introduced S. 344, A bill to permit the televising of [United States] Supreme Court proceedings, on January 22, 2007. If enacted, the legislation will require the Supreme Court to televise its proceedings unless a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://micheladrien.blogspot.com/2007/06/michigan-symposium-on-tv-in-us-supreme.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A. Einf&#252;hrungsgesetz zum Strafgesetzbuch f&#252;r den Norddeutschen ...</title>
    <link href="http://mikesch.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/24/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-04-03:/commentary/967058</id>
    <updated>2007-04-03T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Studium </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
11Eberhardt Schmidt; S.344, &#167; 298. 12K&#246;bler; S. 204. 13Eisenhardt; S.327, Rn.370. 14Laufs; S.310. 15Eisenhardt; S.212, Rn.293. 16Hattenhauer, S. 7. 17Vgl JA; S.87, Rn. 315. 18HRG S.1534. 19Vgl HRG S.1534. 20JA; S.86, Rn. 311. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://mikesch.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/24/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cameras in the Supreme Court</title>
    <link href="http://ipolicy.blogspot.com/2007/02/cameras-at-supreme-court.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-15:/commentary/365696</id>
    <updated>2007-02-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Information Policy </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Arlen Specter, pictured left, the ranking Republican on the committee, has introduced legislation (S. 344) that would require the justices to televise their proceedings. The First Amendment Center provides examples of why several judges ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://ipolicy.blogspot.com/2007/02/cameras-at-supreme-court.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Bill S.344</title>
    <link href="http://www.michaelbrazellmurray.com/wordpress/?p=256" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-12:/commentary/239825</id>
    <updated>2007-02-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">
Arlen Specter, the Republican senior senator from PA, has strongly pushed for a bill to require the Supreme Court to televise its proceedings. The measure is a bipartisan effort to lucidate the processes of the highest court, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.michaelbrazellmurray.com/wordpress/?p=256"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Specter re-introduces bill to allow cameras in Supreme Court</title>
    <link href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2007/01/specter-re-introduces-bill-to-allow.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-01-30:/commentary/210839</id>
    <updated>2007-01-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>JURIST - Paper Chase </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Arlen Specter (R-PA) [official website; JURIST news archive] re-introduced a bill [S.344 summary] Monday which would allow US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] proceedings to be televised, &amp;quot;unless the Court decides, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2007/01/specter-re-introduces-bill-to-allow.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>2:20 Senator Specter Speaks in Favor of S. 344</title>
    <link href="http://leahy.senate.gov/MFTF/2007/01/29.html#a3466" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-01-29:/commentary/282100</id>
    <updated>2007-01-29T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>More from the Floor </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Specter, ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, came to the floor to speak in favor of S. 344, a bill that would allow Supreme Court proceedings to be televised. He stated that televising court proceedings was appropriate ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://leahy.senate.gov/MFTF/2007/01/29.html#a3466"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Action: Scheduled for Debate: S. 344: A bill to permit the ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-344" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-01-23:/commentary/2982620</id>
    <updated>2007-01-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Tracked by GovTrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill has been added to a schedule of legislation to be considered for debate, or has been recommended by a committee to be considered. [This event matched these trackers: Active Legislation ]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-344"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 344, A bill to permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_344.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-01-21:/commentary/282101</id>
    <updated>2007-01-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>washingtonwatch.com - Welcome to washingtonwatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 344 would permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_344.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
