<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for S.49 Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s49/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s49/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2009-01-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/39734</id>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 49: A bill to help Federal prosecutors and investigators combat ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-49" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-01-07:/commentary/3942558</id>
    <updated>2009-01-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Tracked by GovTrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the US Congress: A bill to help Federal prosecutors and investigators combat public corruption by strengthening and clarifying the law.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-49&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Foucauldian Reflections: TOWARDS THEORISING POSTMODERN ACTIVISM:</title>
    <link href="http://foucauldians.blogspot.com/2008/12/towards-theorising-postmodern-activism.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-22:/commentary/3785198</id>
    <updated>2008-12-22T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Foucauldian Reflections </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
3, 2002, S. 49-64 &#183; Lemke, Thomas &#195;&#162;&#226;&#8218;&#172;&#197;&#8220;Comment on Nancy Fraser: Rereading Foucault in the Shadow of Globalization&#195;&#162;&#226;&#8218;&#172;&#197;&#8220;, in: Constellations. An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2003, S. 172-17&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://foucauldians.blogspot.com/2008/12/towards-theorising-postmodern-activism.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RTA (Restricted To Adults) - Self Labeling for Adult Entertainment ...</title>
    <link href="http://rtalabel.org/smarty.php?content=news&amp;amp;item=001" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-02:/commentary/3610600</id>
    <updated>2008-12-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>RTALABEL News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In January, Stevens sponsored S. 49, a version of the bill that called for the Federal Trade Commission in conjunction with the office of the U.S. Attorney General to &#226;&#8364;&#339;promulgate regulations establishing clearly identifiable marks or ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rtalabel.org/smarty.php?content=news&amp;amp;item=001&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Foucauldian Reflections: Parrhesia: A Journal of Critical ...</title>
    <link href="http://foucauldians.blogspot.com/2008/11/parrhesia-journal-of-critical.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-25:/commentary/3471151</id>
    <updated>2008-11-25T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Foucauldian Reflections </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
3, 2002, S. 49-64 &#183; Lemke, Thomas &#195;&#162;&#226;&#8218;&#172;&#197;&#8220;Comment on Nancy Fraser: Rereading Foucault in the Shadow of Globalization&#195;&#162;&#226;&#8218;&#172;&#197;&#8220;, in: Constellations. An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2003, S. 172-17&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://foucauldians.blogspot.com/2008/11/parrhesia-journal-of-critical.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Can The Government Protect Children Online?</title>
    <link href="http://www.ypulse.com/can-the-government-protect-children-online/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-03:/commentary/2951856</id>
    <updated>2008-10-03T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Ypulse </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Cynopsis Kids reported that the Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act (aka S.49) has passed the Senate. Their description of the bill given by Cynopsis is as follows:. This week also US Senate also approved the Protecting Children ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ypulse.com/can-the-government-protect-children-online/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do We Need POTA?</title>
    <link href="http://amitsworld.wordpress.com/2008/09/20/do-we-need-pota/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-19:/commentary/2866608</id>
    <updated>2008-09-19T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Assorted Monologues </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Under S. 49(2) of POTA, police could detain a suspected person for 90 days and this period could be extended for another 90 days if State could persuade the Court about the pressing need. Denial of bail (unless Court reads abuse of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://amitsworld.wordpress.com/2008/09/20/do-we-need-pota/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>I submitted this proposal for discussion to Ken Bell and the ...</title>
    <link href="http://missionalcog.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/i-submitted-this-proposal-for-discussion-to-ken-bell-and-the-church-of-god-executive-council/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-21:/commentary/2084834</id>
    <updated>2008-04-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Missional Church of God </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
198 - S. 49 ALL PROPERTY HELD FOR CHURCH OF GOD (Addendum to current three paragraphs):. All properties of disbanded congregations are either to be designated as a new field work, assigned to an existing congregation for an additional ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://missionalcog.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/i-submitted-this-proposal-for-discussion-to-ken-bell-and-the-church-of-god-executive-council/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>General Assembly Proposals That Make a Difference: Property Sales ...</title>
    <link href="http://missionalcog.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/general-assembly-proposals-that-make-a-difference-property-sales-and-church-planting/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-18:/commentary/2075344</id>
    <updated>2008-04-18T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Missional Church of God </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
198 - S. 49 ALL PROPERTY HELD FOR CHURCH OF GOD (Addendum to current three paragraphs):. All properties of disbanded congregations are either to be designated as a new field work, assigned to an existing congregation for an additional ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://missionalcog.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/general-assembly-proposals-that-make-a-difference-property-sales-and-church-planting/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Bill S. 49&#8230; What Will it Mean for Your Classroom?</title>
    <link href="http://notesfromtheridge.edublogs.org/2007/08/07/senate-bill-s-49-what-will-it-mean-for-your-classroom/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-08-07:/commentary/963939</id>
    <updated>2007-08-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Notes from the Ridge </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
John&#8217;s post references Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska, who recently introduced Senate Bill S.49 (referred to many as DOPA, Jr.), which has become a real hot button issue of late. The bill would block access to many social networking ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://notesfromtheridge.edublogs.org/2007/08/07/senate-bill-s-49-what-will-it-mean-for-your-classroom/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>teentechweek : DOPA (I added two slideshows from my presentations ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.rssmicro.com/?f=0&amp;amp;st=Presentations&amp;amp;fid=56531507" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-08:/commentary/837412</id>
    <updated>2007-06-08T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Presentations </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act or S.49 This bill, introduced by Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK), on January 4, 2007, seeks to take the 2006 DOPA bill further as well as the 1934 Communications Act. Again, schools and libraries ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rssmicro.com/?f=0&amp;amp;st=Presentations&amp;amp;fid=56531507&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Filter them Tubes</title>
    <link href="http://www.protean-design.com/lis551/?p=3" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-04-05:/commentary/1018727</id>
    <updated>2007-04-05T04:38:38Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Free to Decide </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Filter them Tubes Law No Comments &#187;   Well, it appears Senator Ted Stevens is at again, introducing what may be prematurely termed &#8220;Son of DOPA&#8221; on another bill introduced to congress, this time under the heading &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;&#8220;S.49&#8220;&lt;/st&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.protean-design.com/lis551/?p=3&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Would Your Favorite Website be Banned by DOPA?</title>
    <link href="http://www.techliberation.com/archives/042146.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-03-10:/commentary/439230</id>
    <updated>2007-03-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Technology Liberation Front </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The latest version of DOPA is contained in S. 49, &amp;quot;Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act,&amp;quot; which was reintroduced just a few weeks into the current session of Congress by Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techliberation.com/archives/042146.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Bill S.49</title>
    <link href="http://www.rotpod.net/rotpod/?p=6" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-18:/commentary/298111</id>
    <updated>2007-02-18T05:02:36Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>RotPod Blog</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senate Bill S.49 February 17th, 2007    [ Sen. Ted Stevens]Senate Bill S.49 could ban sites like wikipedia and myspace from public schools and libraries.  Like last years DOPA, S.49, intended to protect children from online predators, could ban information&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rotpod.net/rotpod/?p=6&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Bill S.49</title>
    <link href="http://rotpod.net/rotpodblog/?p=12" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-18:/commentary/298114</id>
    <updated>2007-02-18T01:49:45Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WordPress &#8250; Error</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senate Bill S.49 February 17th, 2007    [ Sen. Ted Stevens]Senate Bill S.49 could ban sites like wikipedia and myspace from public schools and libraries.  Like last years DOPA, S.49, intended to protect children from online predators, could ban information&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rotpod.net/rotpodblog/?p=12&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Guess Who&amp;#39;s Back? Back Again. DOPA&amp;#39;s Back, Tell a Friend.</title>
    <link href="http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/2/17/18943/7553" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-17:/commentary/298105</id>
    <updated>2007-02-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>MyDD </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
What the DOPA-esque section of S. 49 does is make it so that schools and ... The way that S. 49 works, that job&amp;#39;s left to the FCC. But S. 49 gives guidance, telling the commission to take into consideration the extent to which a site: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/2/17/18943/7553&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Deleting Online Predators Act reappears for 2007</title>
    <link href="http://digg.com/politics/Deleting_Online_Predators_Act_reappears_for_2007" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-16:/commentary/425977</id>
    <updated>2007-02-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>digg / dig </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A new bill, ambiguously named S.49 for the time being, was introduced to the Senate by Senator Ted &amp;quot;Internet Tubes&amp;quot; Stevens (R-AK) this January that smells strangely of DOPA. In fact, Title II of the newly-proposed bill is ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://digg.com/politics/Deleting_Online_Predators_Act_reappears_for_2007&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sen. Ted Stevens Introduces &#8220;Son of DOPA&#8221;</title>
    <link href="http://imranimtiaz.com/?p=42" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-15:/commentary/265953</id>
    <updated>2007-02-15T22:04:53Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>My Blog - ImmI :)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Sen. Ted Stevens Introduces &#8220;Son of DOPA&#8221;   Sen. Ted Stevens Introduces &#8220;Son of DOPA&#8221;  DJCacophony writes &#8220;Ted &#8217;series of tubes&#8217; Stevens has introduced a bill, going by the interim name S.49, that aims to block access to interactive websites &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://imranimtiaz.com/?p=42&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WARNING: THIS WEBSITE MAY CONTAIN SEXUAL MATERIAL OR MATERIAL ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.teambio.org/2007/02/warning-this-website-may-contain-sexual-material-or-material-objectionable-to-children-and-big-brother/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-15:/commentary/265950</id>
    <updated>2007-02-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">
It&#8217;s all included in S.49, called the Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act, aka DOPA Jr. ... S.49, Senator+Ted+Stevens, internet+restrictions, online+predators, freedom+of+ speech, Big+Brother, sex+on+the+internet ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.teambio.org/2007/02/warning-this-website-may-contain-sexual-material-or-material-objectionable-to-children-and-big-brother/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sen. Ted Stevens Introduces &amp;quot;Son of DOPA&amp;quot;</title>
    <link href="http://www.habboforum.com/news/38089-sen-ted-stevens-introduces-son-dopa.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-15:/commentary/450928</id>
    <updated>2007-02-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Habbo Forum </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
DJCacophony writes &amp;quot;Ted &amp;#39;series of tubes&amp;#39; Stevens has introduced a bill, going by the interim name S.49, that aims to block access to interactive websites from schools and libraries. The wording of the bill is vague enough to apply to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.habboforum.com/news/38089-sen-ted-stevens-introduces-son-dopa.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&amp;quot;Project Online Safety&amp;quot; and Other New Internet Safety Initiatives</title>
    <link href="http://www.techliberation.com/archives/042002.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-07:/commentary/204698</id>
    <updated>2007-02-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">
And the Deleting Online Predators Act (DOPA), which would ban social networking sites in schools in libraries, was reintroduced in the Senate (S. 49) in mid-January. Additional regulatory proposals are certain to follow, including the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techliberation.com/archives/042002.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&amp;quot;Project Online Safety&amp;quot; and Other New Internet Safety Initiatives</title>
    <link href="http://blog.pff.org/archives/2007/02/project_online.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-07:/commentary/450927</id>
    <updated>2007-02-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Progress &amp;amp; Freedom Foundation Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
And the Deleting Online Predators Act (DOPA), which would ban social networking sites in schools in libraries, was reintroduced in the Senate (S. 49) in mid-January. Additional regulatory proposals are certain to follow, including the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.pff.org/archives/2007/02/project_online.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DOPA Junior</title>
    <link href="http://bumpontheblog.etowns.net/?p=118" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-01-25:/commentary/374350</id>
    <updated>2007-01-25T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bump on the Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
After comparing the wording of the original bill and the wording of S. 49, Title II (DOPA), it appears that the language is identical, with only slight revisions referring to cyber-bullying. Will Richardson inquired about this issue in ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bumpontheblog.etowns.net/?p=118&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DOPA is Back</title>
    <link href="http://edublog.info/?p=58" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-01-24:/commentary/236766</id>
    <updated>2007-01-24T12:22:39Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ScienzTeachr- Classroom III</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
DOPA is Back   January 24, 2007 by jmmblake.    My question - Will this impact the use of Moodle in schools?    Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress)     S.49  Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act (Introduced in Senate)  It is BACK&#8230;.  powe&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://edublog.info/?p=58&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DOPA is Back</title>
    <link href="http://incsub.org/wpmu/nwa/?p=194" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-01-24:/commentary/298116</id>
    <updated>2007-01-24T12:22:24Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mr. Blake&#8217;s ClassBlog</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
DOPA is Back  Filed under:  Editorial   My question - Will this impact the use of Moodle in schools?    Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress)     S.49  Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act (Introduced in Senate)  It is BACK&#8230;.  powered by p&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://incsub.org/wpmu/nwa/?p=194&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DOPA Reincarnated</title>
    <link href="http://www.designinginfo.com/multitypelibrarian/2007/01/dopa-reincarnated.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-01-24:/commentary/236765</id>
    <updated>2007-01-24T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Multitype Librarian </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The bill is numbered S. 49. -- or DOPA Jr., as dubbed by Andy Carvin of PBS Teacher Source learning.now. While too few took the bill seriously last ... We need to watch this closely. Text of S. 49 ClickZ DOPA Rises from the Grave (Maybe)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.designinginfo.com/multitypelibrarian/2007/01/dopa-reincarnated.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DOPA&amp;#39;s First Hatchling Begins to Crack Its Shell</title>
    <link href="http://www.andycarvin.com/archives/2007/01/dopas_first_hatchling_begins_to_crack_it.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-01-22:/commentary/374347</id>
    <updated>2007-01-22T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Andy Carvin&amp;#39;s Waste of Bandwidth </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
From what I can tell, DOPA Jr. doesn&amp;#39;t have a title yet, nor any cosponsors, though it&amp;#39;s referenced as Senate Bill 49, or S. 49. The Library of Congress hasn&amp;#39;t posted the text of the bill yet, but it has this brief summary: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.andycarvin.com/archives/2007/01/dopas_first_hatchling_begins_to_crack_it.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
