Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act
A bill to amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prevent the carriage of child pornography by video service providers, to protect children from online predators, and to restrict the sale or purchase of children's personal information in interstate commerce.
Other Bill Titles (2 more) 1/4/2007--Introduced.
Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act - Amends the Communications Act of 1934 to require the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to issue regulations requiring video services to prevent child pornography. Amends the Crime Control Act of 1990 to triple th... moreSee Full Bill Text
Sponsor
Committees
Amendments
This bill has no amendments.
Bill Status
| Introduced | ![]() | Voted on by Senate | ![]() | Voted on by House | ![]() | Considered By President | ![]() | Bill Becomes Law |
| January 04, 2007 |
In the News
We are not currently finding any news articles on this topic using our daily automated search of Google News. However, if you know of a relevant news article to display here, OpenCongress site editors have the ability to add it manually. Simply e-mail us the web address of this page and the web address of your suggested news article: We'll post relevant links as quickly as possible. Also, if this topic is important to you, you could write a letter to the editor -- if a news article refers this specific topic by name, a link to that news article is likely to appear here soon.
Blog Coverage
April 21, 2008 I submitted this proposal for discussion to Ken Bell and the ...
198 - S. 49 ALL PROPERTY HELD FOR CHURCH OF GOD (Addendum to current three paragraphs):. All properties of disbanded congregations are either to be designated as a new field work, assigned to an existing congregation for an additional ...
Source: Missional Church of God
April 18, 2008 General Assembly Proposals That Make a Difference: Property Sales ...
198 - S. 49 ALL PROPERTY HELD FOR CHURCH OF GOD (Addendum to current three paragraphs):. All properties of disbanded congregations are either to be designated as a new field work, assigned to an existing congregation for an additional ...
Source: Missional Church of God
August 07, 2007 Senate Bill S. 49 What Will it Mean for Your Classroom?
Johns post references Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska, who recently introduced Senate Bill S.49 (referred to many as DOPA, Jr.), which has become a real hot button issue of late. The bill would block access to many social networking ...
Source: Notes from the Ridge








Rating Filter: 5
(Close help)
Comments
(Close help)
I have seen schools already take steps to heavily filter content like the above mentioned bill. Blocking sites with user generated content, or other services that allow people to communicate with each other. This is the internet today. It is not just a place to buy stuff and read government approved books. People sharing information is the way we teach and learn, and this should be ENCOURAGED. Blocking social networking / web 2.0 sites is ignoring the future of learning, and alienates students. When students feel they are being blocked from learning, they either stop paying attention, or rebel. Neither of these situations are good for schools. Teachers and administrators NEED to embrace this way our kids are learning on their own, and understand the good with the bad. Also, mind you that based on the proposed rules, this very site would be considered objectionable and suitable for adults only. Is that really the message we want to send out children? Please vote NO, and Arkansas, PLEASE stop reelecting this idiot.
Add A Comment