The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowS.562 - No Child Left Behind Flexibility and Improvements Act
A bill to provide for flexibility and improvements in elementary and secondary education, and for other purposes.

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
S 562 ISCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To provide for flexibility and improvements in elementary and secondary education, and for other purposes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
February 13, 2007
Ms. COLLINS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and PensionsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To provide for flexibility and improvements in elementary and secondary education, and for other purposes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `No Child Left Behind Flexibility and Improvements Act'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 2. DISCRETION TO MODIFY ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS TIMELINE.
Section 1111(b)(2)(F) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (
(1) by striking `(F) TIMELINE- Each State' and inserting the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(F) TIMELINE-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(i) IN GENERAL- Each State'; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) by adding at the end the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(ii) DISCRETION OF SECRETARY TO MODIFY THE TIMELINE- Every 3 years, the Secretary--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(I) shall review the requirements of the timeline established in clause (i); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(II) may issue guidance or regulations modifying such requirements if the Secretary determines, at the Secretary's discretion and after a review of the progress of the States towards making adequate yearly progress for the 2013-2014 school year, that modifications to the timeline are in the interests of improving student achievement and are in keeping with the purposes of this title.'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 3. ALTERNATIVE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEMS.
Section 1111(b)(2) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (
(1) by striking subparagraph (I) and inserting the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(I) ANNUAL IMPROVEMENT FOR SCHOOLS-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(i) IN GENERAL- Each year for a school to make adequate yearly progress under this paragraph--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(I) each group of students described in subparagraph (C)(v) must meet or exceed the objectives set by the State under subparagraph (G), except that if any group described in subparagraph (C)(v) does not meet those objectives in any particular year, the school shall be considered to have made adequate yearly progress if--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(aa) the percentage of students in that group who did not meet or exceed the proficient level of academic achievement on the State assessment under paragraph (3) decreased by 5 percent over the past year, or an aggregate of 10 percent over 2 years, and that group has made progress on 1 or more of the academic indicators described in subparagraph (C)(vi) or (vii); orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(bb) the students in that group demonstrate that they are making progress towards proficiency through an additional model or system for measuring student progress described in subparagraph (J) and that group has made progress on one or more of the academic indicators described in subparagraph (C)(vi) or (vii); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(II) not less than 95 percent of each group of students described in subparagraph (C)(v) who are enrolled in the school are required to take the assessments, consistent with paragraph (3)(C)(xi) and with accommodations, guidelines, and alternative assessment provided in the same manner as those provided under section 612(a)(17)(A) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and paragraph (3), on which adequate yearly progress is based (except that the 95 percent requirement described in this clause shall not apply in a case in which the number of students in a category is insufficient to yield statistically reliable information or the results would reveal personally identifiable information about an individual student).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(ii) CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES- In the case of a child with a disability (as defined in section 602(3) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act), a State may deem the child to have met the State's proficient level of academic achievement on the State assessments for purposes of calculating adequate yearly progress under this section if--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(I) the student's individualized education program plan team (as defined in section 614(d)(1)(B) of such Act) designates an alternate assessment based on alternate or modified student academic achievement standards as a more appropriate measure of the student's academic progress and achievement for purposes of the assessment requirements under this part; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(II) the student achieves a proficient score on such alternate assessment.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(iii) REPORT FROM SEA- For any year that a State educational agency makes use of the flexibility provided by this section to allow alternate assessments for more than 3 percent of the total student population Statewide, the State educational agency shall make available to the public a report that includes the percentage of all special education students in the State who were assessed according to clause (ii).'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) by redesignating subparagraphs (J) and (K) as subparagraphs (L) and (M), respectively; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) by inserting after subparagraph (I) (as amended by paragraph (1)) the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(J) ADDITIONAL MODELS AND SYSTEMS FOR MEASURING STUDENT PROGRESS- In developing a single, statewide State accountability system pursuant to subparagraph (A), a State may establish models and systems for measuring student progress for purposes of determining whether an agency or school has made adequate yearly progress that are in addition to the models and systems otherwise described in this paragraph if the models and systems are in keeping with the purposes of this title. Additional models and systems that measure student progress under this paragraph may include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(i) cohort growth models that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(I) demonstrate progress based on longitudinal student assessment results indicating improvement in the academic performance of the same cohort of students over time; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(II) may in some instances specify different starting points, different intermediate goals, and different annual measurable objectives for different cohorts;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(ii) indexing systems that demonstrate progress based on improvement in assessment scores for students below the proficient level, such as improvements from the below basic to basic level, or from basic to another intermediate level below the proficient level, if the system does not include improvement in students scores for students who scored at the proficient level and higher; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(iii) a system that demonstrates progress based on improvements in closing the achievement gap or making progress towards another State-established high-achievement target, such as a system that demonstrates progress towards having all subgroups meet or exceed the current percentage of proficient students at the State's top-performing schools (such as the top 20 percent of schools), if the system requires continued improvement towards subsequently higher targets until all students have reached the proficient level.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(K) REQUIREMENT FOR GUIDANCE FROM THE SECRETARY ON ADDITIONAL MODELS AND SYSTEMS FOR MEASURING STUDENT PROGRESS- Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of the No Child Left Behind Flexibility and Improvements Act, the Secretary shall establish specific models of additional models and systems for measuring student progress that meet the requirements of subparagraph (J), including models of cohort-growth systems, indexing systems, or high-achievement target systems described in subparagraph (J). To the extent possible, the models shall demonstrate the maximum amount of flexibility available under this part in the design of additional models and systems for measuring student progress. In addition, the Secretary shall create a task force to provide guidance and other technical assistance to those States interested in incorporating additional models and systems for measuring student progress into their State accountability plan.'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 4. STATE OPTION REGARDING STUDENTS WITH LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY.
Section 1111(b)(2) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (
`(N) STATE OPTION REGARDING STUDENTS WITH LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(i) IN GENERAL- In determining whether a school, local educational agency, or State has made adequate yearly progress under this subsection, a State shall have the option to include in the students with limited English proficiency subgroup a student who was formerly included in the subgroup and subsequently acquired proficiency in English.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(ii) DURATION OF INCLUSION IN THE SUBGROUP- A State may include a student described in clause (i) in the students with limited English proficiency subgroup until the student completes secondary school.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(iii) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION- Nothing in this subparagraph shall be construed--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(I) to count a student described in clause (i) as a student with limited English proficiency for purposes of--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(aa) determining a State-defined minimum subgroup size; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(bb) allocating funds under title III;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(II) to require a student described in clause (i)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(aa) to continue to take a limited English proficiency assessment under paragraph (7); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(bb) to receive language services provided to students with limited English proficiency.'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 5. LOCAL ACADEMIC ASSESSMENTS.
Section 1111(b)(3)(A) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (
(1) by striking `(A) IN GENERAL- Each State plan' and inserting the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(A) IMPLEMENTATION OF ASSESSMENTS-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(i) IN GENERAL- Each State plan'; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) by adding at the end the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(ii) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION REGARDING USE OF LOCAL ASSESSMENTS- Nothing in this Act shall be construed to prohibit a State from using a local assessment system or a mixed system of State and local assessments in carrying out clause (i), if the assessment system--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(I) is aligned with the State's content and achievement standards and provides coherent information about student attainment of those standards;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(II) is valid and reliable, and consistent with relevant professional and technical standards;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(III) provides individual student reports and itemized score analysis; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(IV) allows the State to aggregate, with confidence, data from disparate local assessments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(iii) REQUIRED TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE- Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of the No Child Left Behind Flexibility and Improvements Act, the Secretary shall provide models of local assessment systems or mixed system of State and local assessments meeting the requirements described in clause (ii), and shall provide guidance and technical assistance to States on ways that these systems may be used to satisfy the assessment requirements of this part.'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 6. DEFERRAL OF ACADEMIC ASSESSMENTS.
Section 1111(b)(3)(D) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (
`(i) $640,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(ii) $670,000,000 for fiscal year 2009.'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 7. ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS BY GROUP AND SUBJECT.
Section 1116(b) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (
(1) in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), by inserting `with respect to the performance of a particular group of students described in section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) in the same academic subject,' after `that fails, for 2 consecutive years,';CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) of paragraph (5), by inserting `with respect to the performance of a particular group of students described in section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) in the same academic subject,' after `that fails to make adequate yearly progress,';CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) in the matter preceding clause (i) of paragraph (7)(C), by inserting `with respect to the performance of a particular group of students described in section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) in the same academic subject,' after `that fails to make adequate yearly progress,'; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) in the matter preceding clause (i) of paragraph (8)(A), by inserting `with respect to the performance of a particular group of students described in section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) in the same academic subject,' after `continues to fail to make adequate yearly progress,'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 8. MODIFICATION OF THE DEFINITION OF HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHER.
Subpart 1 of part A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (
`SEC. 1120C. MODIFICATION OF THE DEFINITION OF HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHER.
`(a) Highly Qualified Teachers of Multiple Academic Subjects- Notwithstanding section 9101(23) or any other provision of law, a middle or secondary school teacher employed to teach multiple academic subjects shall be deemed to be highly qualified for purposes of this part, if--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(1) the teacher meets the requirements of section 9101(23)(A);CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(2) the teacher has a bachelor's degree;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(3) the teacher has demonstrated a high level of competency in at least one subject taught by the teacher by passing a test described in subclause (I), or a successful completion described in subclause (II), of section 9101(23)(B)(ii), applicable to such subject;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(4)(A) the State educational agency makes a determination, for a period of not more than 3 years at a time, that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(i) the teacher should be considered highly qualified for purposes of this part based on a showing that the teacher is making progress toward becoming highly qualified as defined in section 9101(23); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(ii) at the time the State educational agency makes such determination, the teacher teaches in a local educational agency of the State that has provided the State educational agency with evidence (that may include the fact that the local educational agency serves a small and rural school facing unique staffing or hiring challenges that require teachers to teach multiple academic subjects) that the local educational agency has made a reasonable effort to provide teachers who are highly qualified under section 9101(23) to every student served by the local educational agency; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(B) the teacher has an academic minor consisting of not less than 15 credit hours, or the equivalent of an academic minor as defined by the State educational agency in its State plan pursuant to section 1119(a)(2), in each academic subject that is taught by the teacher (other than a subject for which the teacher has demonstrated a high level of competency under paragraph (3)), and each such subject is related to a subject for which the teacher has demonstrated a high level of competency under paragraph (3).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(b) Report- For each year that a teacher in a State is deemed to be highly qualified under subsection (a), the State educational agency in the State shall make available to the public a report that includes--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(1) the number of teachers in the State that are deemed highly qualified under subsection (a); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(2) the total amount of subgrant funds made available under subpart 2 of part A of title II that the State awards to local educational agencies under such subpart that are available to assist the teachers described in paragraph (1) with the process of becoming highly qualified as defined in section 9101(23).'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 9. READING ACTIVITIES FOR INDIVIDUAL STUDENTS.
Section 1202(c)(7) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (
`(C) READING ACTIVITIES FOR INDIVIDUAL STUDENTS- Notwithstanding any other provision of this subpart, an eligible local educational agency may use the funds provided under the subgrant for any activity described in subparagraph (A) that is provided to a student in a manner other than on a classwide instruction basis, including small group instruction and one-to-one instruction.'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 10. DEFINITION OF HIGHLY QUALIFIED.
Section 9101(23)(B)(ii)(II) (
except that the Secretary shall promulgate regulations permitting a teacher to demonstrate subject area competence in history, geography, economics, government, civics, or related subjects at middle or secondary schools in the State through a State social studies certificate that qualifies the teacher to teach such subjects; and'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
OC Blog Articles Related To This Bill
Recent OC Blog Articles
- Yes, let's stride towards an open VCS for legislation (or, GitHub for laws on OC) May 23, 2012
- Contact Congress Today to #FreeTHOMAS May 17, 2012
- Yochai Benkler: Blueprint for Democratic Participation May 10, 2012
- New NDAA Would Give the Military Clandestine Cyberwar Powers May 08, 2012
- The Week Ahead in Congress May 07, 2012

U.S. Congress - Text of S.562 as Introduced in Senate No Child Left Behind Flexibility and Improvements Act



