<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for S.574 Iraq War Policy bill</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s574/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s574/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-12-14T19:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/41066</id>
  <entry>
    <title>H-Net Reviews</title>
    <link href="http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=23613" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-14:/commentary/3719999</id>
    <updated>2008-12-14T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>H-Review - Recent Reviews </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Perspektiven einer historischen Politikforschung, Frankfurt am Main, New York 2005, S. 7- 26; Thomas Mergel, &#195;&#339;berlegungen zu einer Kulturgeschichte der Politik, in: Geschichte und Gesellschaft 28 (2002), S. 574-606; Achim Landwehr, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=23613&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rez. GA: W. Steinmetz (Hrsg.): &quot;Politik&quot; - H-Soz-u-Kult ...</title>
    <link href="http://hsozkult.geschichte.hu-berlin.de/rezensionen/type=rezbuecher&amp;amp;id=11459" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-13:/commentary/3745118</id>
    <updated>2008-12-13T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>H-Soz-u-Kult </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Perspektiven einer historischen Politikforschung, Frankfurt am Main, New York 2005, S. 7- 26; Thomas Mergel, &#195;&#339;berlegungen zu einer Kulturgeschichte der Politik, in: Geschichte und Gesellschaft 28 (2002), S. 574-606; Achim Landwehr, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hsozkult.geschichte.hu-berlin.de/rezensionen/type=rezbuecher&amp;amp;id=11459&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PolitiFact | McCain opposed 2007 war funding bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/773/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-02:/commentary/3422803</id>
    <updated>2008-10-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Politifact.com statements </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
THOMAS, S. 574, A bill to express the sense of Congress on Iraq, accessed Aug. 12, 2008. Today Show, NBC News, interview with Sen. Barack Obama, July 18, 2007. E-mail exchange with McCain spokesman Joseph Pounder, Aug. 11 and 12, 2008 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/773/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>On Memorial Day - A Look at Sessions Record with Veterans</title>
    <link href="http://www.LeftInAlabama.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1812" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-26:/commentary/2918076</id>
    <updated>2008-05-26T12:20:02Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name> Left In Alabama Connecting Progressive Voices in Alabama Politics </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 I know we got after Sessions and his vote on the GI Bill last week ...  Joint Resolution 20: 2/14/07   Motion to proceeed to debate Iraq Resolution (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.574&lt;/strong&gt;) Senate Roll Call&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.LeftInAlabama.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1812&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ery</title>
    <link href="http://ery-932.blogspot.com/2007/10/ery-its-long-way-from-singapore-to.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-11:/commentary/1226906</id>
    <updated>2007-10-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Ery </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
17th, every single Democratic senator (except the hospitalized Tim Johnson) voted for cloture on S. 574 which stated: &#226;&#8364;&#339;Congress disapproves of the decision of President George W. Bush announced on January 10, 2007, . ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ery-932.blogspot.com/2007/10/ery-its-long-way-from-singapore-to.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Iraq: when the Democratic meltdown started</title>
    <link href="http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/3/1/201647/2945" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-28:/commentary/356447</id>
    <updated>2007-02-28T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>MyDD </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
We were getting towards 60 on WL, but were falling short - perhaps we were at the 56 that voted for cloture on the motion to table S 574. Then the GOP struck again with the Gregg res - which took from WL just the one paragraph: the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/3/1/201647/2945&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>First Work Period Concluded</title>
    <link href="http://chpponline.blogspot.com/2007/02/first-work-period-concluded.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-26:/commentary/365152</id>
    <updated>2007-02-26T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Capitol Hill &amp;quot;Daily Brief&amp;quot; </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
20, the spending bill to finish out Fiscal Year 2007, and failed to proceed on its Iraq bill, S. 574. Both chambers were off on the President&amp;#39;s Day recess last week. The first working period ran from the convening of Congress at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://chpponline.blogspot.com/2007/02/first-work-period-concluded.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senator Harry Reid is a Contradiction</title>
    <link href="http://morewhat.com/wordpress/?p=1042" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-23:/commentary/331897</id>
    <updated>2007-02-23T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Blog @ Morewhat.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... his party will not &#8220;cut and run&#8221; from Iraq or raise taxes This is what Harry Reid did. Section I and Section II contradict each other. To express the sense of Congress on Iraq. (Placed on Calendar in Senate) S 574 PCS Calendar No. [...]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://morewhat.com/wordpress/?p=1042&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>My small contribution to the anti-war effort (today)</title>
    <link href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/2/21/15592/9043" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-20:/commentary/312570</id>
    <updated>2007-02-20T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Kos </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The most recent bill in the Senate, S.574, was defeated on Saturday due to a lack of cloture. This bill is the same as passed through the House last week, essentially offering a bid of no confidence on the &amp;quot;surge&amp;quot; and reinforcing that ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/2/21/15592/9043&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cloture Motion Rejected 56-34, A bill to express the sense of ...</title>
    <link href="http://owenpshaw.net/congress/senate/110/roll00051.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-19:/commentary/365151</id>
    <updated>2007-02-19T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>US Senate Votes </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On the Cloture Motion - A bill to express the sense of Congress on Iraq. (S. 574, Roll Call 51)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://owenpshaw.net/congress/senate/110/roll00051.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>?????:???????????</title>
    <link href="http://taste-of-union.blogspot.com/2007/02/blog-post_19.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-18:/commentary/365156</id>
    <updated>2007-02-18T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Taste of the Union </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
2?17??????????????????(S.574)??????????????????????????????(Cloture Vote)??60???????????????????56???34?4???????? ??????????? ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://taste-of-union.blogspot.com/2007/02/blog-post_19.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Stand up for your Country &amp;amp; your Troops for February 19, 2007</title>
    <link href="http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-fGey8loydKj.f.DZnTesTYVBIxg-?cq=1&amp;amp;p=489" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-18:/commentary/334465</id>
    <updated>2007-02-18T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>El-Ralph-Bo&amp;#39;s, Web Page </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... the 9/11 fanatics back here to our shores? To do further harm? I ask &amp;amp; challenge to both of you why you look to betray my country &amp;amp; those who volunteer &amp;amp; serve in uniform? Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to S.574.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-fGey8loydKj.f.DZnTesTYVBIxg-?cq=1&amp;amp;p=489&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Iraq: Levin joins Reid in opposing Murtha plan</title>
    <link href="http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/2/19/124626/816" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-18:/commentary/293076</id>
    <updated>2007-02-18T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>MyDD </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
We have the evidence of the votes on the Levin Amendment and Kerry Amendment (qv tags) last year; of the motion to proceed votes on S 470 and S 574; sundry other votes on off-the-point issues that might contain some information vaguely ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/2/19/124626/816&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dems lose in Senate vote</title>
    <link href="http://bokertov.typepad.com/btb/2007/02/dems_lose_in_se.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-17:/commentary/293079</id>
    <updated>2007-02-17T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Boker tov, Boulder! </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The vote was 56 - 34 NOT to proceed to debate and vote on S.574 / HR CON RES 63 - the nonbinding resolution which would have asserted Congressional disapproval of the president&#8217;s plan to add more combat troops... while still pledging ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bokertov.typepad.com/btb/2007/02/dems_lose_in_se.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>56 Senators vote to reject the president&amp;#39;s Iraq plan</title>
    <link href="http://jinchi.blogspot.com/2007/02/56-senators-vote-to-reject-presidents.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-16:/commentary/365155</id>
    <updated>2007-02-16T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Jinchi </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 574 To express the sense of Congress on Iraq. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON IRAQ. It is the sense of Congress that-- ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://jinchi.blogspot.com/2007/02/56-senators-vote-to-reject-presidents.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Votes Against Debating Iraq War Resolution</title>
    <link href="http://camillusblog.blogspot.com/2007/02/senate-votes-against-debating-iraq-war.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-16:/commentary/365153</id>
    <updated>2007-02-16T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Camillus </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
After a difficult, tightly managed debate, the US Senate just voted 56-34 against proceeding to a vote on S. 574, a Senate bill expressing, as the House did, disapproval of a House-passed Iraq war resolution. Democrats tried to move to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://camillusblog.blogspot.com/2007/02/senate-votes-against-debating-iraq-war.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Saturday, February 17, 2007: A Second Try At Cloture on an Iraq ...</title>
    <link href="http://todayinthesenate.blogspot.com/2007/02/saturday-february-17-2007-second-try-at.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-16:/commentary/365150</id>
    <updated>2007-02-16T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Today in the Senate </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
12:00 pm: Convene and resume consideration of the motion to proceed to S. 574, a bill to express the sense of Congress on Iraq. The time until 1:45 pm will be equally controlled and divided by the two leaders. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://todayinthesenate.blogspot.com/2007/02/saturday-february-17-2007-second-try-at.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Vote: Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2007-51" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-16:/commentary/304135</id>
    <updated>2007-02-16T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Sen. Hutchison&amp;#39;s Voting Record -- Monitored... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Cloture Motion Rejected 56-34, 10 not voting. 100% of Democrats supporting, 83% of Republicans opposing. (The Senate uses cloture to end debate on a matter.) Sen. Hutchison : Nay. Go to Bill Status : S. 574: Iraq War Policy bill ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2007-51&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CongressWatch - Weekend Edition 02/17/07</title>
    <link href="http://dailywhackjob.com/index.php/2007/02/17/congresswatch-weekend-edition-021707/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-16:/commentary/293083</id>
    <updated>2007-02-16T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Daily WhackJob </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Reid lost the cloture vote on S. 574 (the Iraq resolution) 56-34 (60 needed for cloture). Lieberman voted against it, McCain skipped to go campaign, and the following Republicans voted for cloture: Snowe (R-ME) Specter (R-PA) Warner ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dailywhackjob.com/index.php/2007/02/17/congresswatch-weekend-edition-021707/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Iraq Resolution Debate</title>
    <link href="http://www.thepoliticalchase.com/journal/2007/2/17/senate-iraq-resolution-debate.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-16:/commentary/293082</id>
    <updated>2007-02-16T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Political Chase </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S 574 PCS. Calendar No. 25. 110th CONGRESS. 1st Session. S. 574. To express the sense of Congress on Iraq. IN THE SENATE. OF THE UNITED STATES ... 110th CONGRESS. 1st Session. S. 574. A BILL. Technorati tags: Senate, Iraq, Resolution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepoliticalchase.com/journal/2007/2/17/senate-iraq-resolution-debate.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Less Than Nothing</title>
    <link href="http://cujo359.blogspot.com/2007/02/less-than-nothing.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-16:/commentary/293080</id>
    <updated>2007-02-16T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Slobber And Spittle </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Today, the Senate refused to vote for cloture on a &amp;quot;sense of the Senate&amp;quot; resolution on Iraq, S.574. The vote, was 56-34 in favor of cloture, with 60 votes being required. The mathematicians among you will note that there were 10 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cujo359.blogspot.com/2007/02/less-than-nothing.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.574 fails 56 - 34</title>
    <link href="http://wesawthat.blogspot.com/2007/02/s574-fails-56-34.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-16:/commentary/293077</id>
    <updated>2007-02-16T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>we saw that... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
senate rejects motion to debate iraq resolution 56 - 34. 60 votes were needed. all democrats voted yes. republicans voting yes: snowe, warner, specter, collins, hagel, coleman, smith. not voting bennett, cochran, bond, corker, ensign, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wesawthat.blogspot.com/2007/02/s574-fails-56-34.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Action: Introduced: S. 574: A bill to express the sense of ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-574" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-11:/commentary/264486</id>
    <updated>2007-02-11T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>GovTrack.us Monitored Events </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Sen. Harry Reid [D-NV] introduced this bill. [This event matched these monitors: Introduced Legislation ]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-574&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

