S.641 - A bill to express the sense of Congress that no funds should be cut off or reduced for American troops in the field which would result in undermining their safety or their ability to complete their assigned missions.
view all titles (1)All Bill Titles
- Official: A bill to express the sense of Congress that no funds should be cut off or reduced for American troops in the field which would result in undermining their safety or their ability to complete their assigned missions. as introduced.
This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.
Bill's Views
- Today: 1
- Past Seven Days: 2
- All-Time: 1,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committees
No Committees found for this Bill
Official Summary
2/15/2007--Introduced.Expresses the sense of Congress that Congress should not take any action that will endanger U.S. military forces in the field, including the elimination or reduction of funds for troops in the field, as such action would undermine their safety or harm their effectivenOfficial Summary
2/15/2007--Introduced.Expresses the sense of Congress that Congress should not take any action that will endanger U.S. military forces in the field, including the elimination or reduction of funds for troops in the field, as such action would undermine their safety or harm their effectiveness in pursuing assigned missions.
...Read the Rest
Recent News Coverage
Hmmmm, no news coverage found for this bill at this time. This means that this this bill has not yet been mentioned on a publicly-searchable news website by either its official number (for example, "H.R. 3200") or title (for example, "America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009"). As soon as that changes, our daily automated search across the Web will catch it and include it here. If this bill is of interest to you, you can write a letter to the editor referring to this bill by name, and if your letter is published on the Web, a link back your letter will appear here within about one day. Or, if you know of a news article about this bill to display here, email us the web address of this page and the web address of your suggested news article: Our editorial team will post relevant links as quickly as possible. Thanks for helping to build public knowledge about Congress.
Recent Blog Coverage
View All (10)
|
View Top Rated
S.641: Senator Paul Simon Water for the World Act of 2011 - U.S. ...
Or, if you know of a news article about this bill to display here, email us the web address of this page and the web address of your suggested news article: Our editorial team will post relevant links as quickly as possible. Thanks for helping to build pub
SimulationsRaum » Blog Archive » »Der ist ja gröÃer als ich!«
St. Gallen: UVK 1999, S. 635-658, hier: S. 641.) Die Zwerge in âSchneewittchenâ tragen also noch einige Wesenszüge ihrer mittelalterlichen Vorfahren. Von allen Monstern sind sie die am wenigsten als solche diskursivierten. ...
Hochleistungskriminell: Bosshart, Trachsel, Bodmer
[50] Ebenda S.641 BGE 120 IA 247, 255. [51] Universeller Menschenrechtsschutz, Walter Kälin/Jörg Künzli, ISBN 3-7190-2459-8, 2005, 1. Wer ist verpflichtet? a) Grundsatz: Verpflichtung der Staaten S.87 ...

U.S. Congress - S.641 A bill to express the sense of Congress that no funds should be cut off or reduced for ...



