The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowS.702 - State Court Interpreter Grant Program Act
A bill to authorize the Attorney General to award grants to State courts to develop and implement State courts interpreter programs.
| Version | Word Count | Changes From Previous Version | Percent Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced in Senate | 1,143 | n/a | n/a |
| Reported in Senate | 2,228 | 21 Show Changes Hide Changes | 16% |
Key: changed or removed text inserted or modified text

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
S 702 IS
Calendar No. 932CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
110th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
2d SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
S. 702CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
[Report No. 110-436]CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To authorize the Attorney General to award grants to State courts to develop and implement State courts interpreter programs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
February 28, 2007CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Mr. KOHL (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, and Mr. DURBIN, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. SPECTER, and Mrs. LINCOLN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the JudiciaryCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
August 1, 2008CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Reported by Mr. LEAHY, with an amendmentCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To authorize the Attorney General to award grants to State courts to develop and implement State courts interpreter programs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `‘State Court Interpreter Grant Program Act'’. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds that-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) the fair administration of justice depends on the ability of all participants in a courtroom proceeding to understand that proceeding, regardless of their English proficiency; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) 19 percent of the population of the United States over 5 years of age speaks a language other than English at home; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) only qualified court interpreters can ensure that persons with limited English proficiency comprehend judicial proceedings in which they are a party; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) the knowledge and skills required of a qualified court interpreter differ substantially from those required in other interpretation settings, such as social service, medical, diplomatic, and conference interpreting; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) the Federal Government has demonstrated its commitment to equal administration of justice regardless of English proficiency; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) regulations implementing title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as well as the guidance issued by the Department of Justice pursuant to Executive Order 13166, issued August 11, 2000, clarify that all recipients of Federal financial assistance, including State courts, are required to take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to their proceedings for persons with limited English proficiency; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(7) 3640 States have developed, or are developing, qualified court interpreting programs; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(8) robust, effective court interpreter programs-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) actively recruit skilled individuals to be court interpreters; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) train those individuals in the interpretation of court proceedings; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) develop and use a thorough, systematic certification process for court interpreters; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) have sufficient funding to ensure that a qualified interpreter will be available to the court whenever necessary; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(9) Federal funding is necessary to-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) encourage State courts that do not have court interpreter programs to develop them; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) assist State courts with nascent court interpreter programs to implement them; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) assist State courts with limited court interpreter programs to enhance them; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) assist State courts with robust court interpreter programs to make further improvements and share successful programs with other States. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 3. STATE COURT INTERPRETER PROGRAM.
(a) Grants Authorized- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- The Administrator of the Office of Justice Programs of the Department of Justice (referred to in this section as the `Administrator'‘Administrator’) shall make grants, in accordance with such regulations as the Attorney General may prescribe, to State courts to develop and implement programs to assist individuals with limited English proficiency to access and understand State court proceedings in which they are a party. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE- The Administrator shall allocate, for each fiscal year, $500,000 of the amount appropriated pursuant to section 4 to be used to establish a court interpreter technical assistance program to assist State courts receiving grants under this Act. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Use of Grants- Grants awarded under subsection (a) may be used by State courts to-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) assess regional language demands; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) develop a court interpreter program for the State courts; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) develop, institute, and administer language certification examinations; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) recruit, train, and certify qualified court interpreters; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) pay for salaries, transportation, and technology necessary to implement the court interpreter program developed under paragraph (2); and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) engage in other related activities, as prescribed by the Attorney General. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Application- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- The highest State court of each State desiring a grant under this section shall submit an application to the Administrator at such time, in such manner, and accompanied by such information as the Administrator may reasonably require. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) STATE COURTS- The highest State court of each State submitting an application under paragraph (1) shall include in the application-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) a demonstration of need for the development, implementation, or expansion of a State court interpreter program; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) an identification of each State court in that State which would receive funds from the grant; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(BC) the amount of funds each State court identified under subparagraph (AB) would receive from the grant; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(CD) the procedures the highest State court would use to directly distribute grant funds to State courts identified under subparagraph (AB). CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) State Court Allotments- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) BASE ALLOTMENT- From amounts appropriated for each fiscal year pursuant to section 4, the Administrator shall allocate $100,000 to each of the highest State court of each State, which has an application approved under subsection (c). CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) DISCRETIONARY ALLOTMENT- From amounts appropriated for each fiscal year pursuant to section 4, the Administrator shall allocate a total of $5,000,000 to the highest State court of States$5,000,000 to be distributed among the highest State courts of States which have an application approved under subsection (c), and that have extraordinary needs that are required to be addressed in order to develop, implement, or expand a State court interpreter program. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) ADDITIONAL ALLOTMENT- In addition to the allocations made under paragraphs (1) and (2), the Administrator shall allocate to each of the highest State court of each State, which has an application approved under subsection (c), an amount equal to the product reached by multiplying-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) the unallocated balance of the amount appropriated for each fiscal year pursuant to section 4; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) the ratio between the number of people over 5 years of age who speak a language other than English at home in the State and the number of people over 5 years of age who speak a language other than English at home in all the States that receive an allocation under paragraph (1), as those numbers are determined by the Bureau of the Census. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) TREATMENT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA- For purposes of this section-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) the District of Columbia shall be treated as a State; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) the District of Columbia Court of Appeals shall act as the highest State court for the District of Columbia. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
There are authorized to be appropriated $15,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2008 through 2012 to carry out this Act. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Calendar No. 932CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
110th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
2d SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
S. 702CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
[Report No. 110-436]CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To authorize the Attorney General to award grants to State courts to develop and implement State courts interpreter programs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
August 1, 2008CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Reported with an amendmentCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
Top-Rated Comments
Recent OC Blog Articles
- With SOPA Shelved, Congress Readies its Next Attack on the Internet Feb 13, 2012
- Anti-Web Censorship Bill Protest from Our Perspective at OC Feb 08, 2012
- Senate Passes FAA Bill With Anti-Union Language Feb 07, 2012
- House Getting Creative With the Earmark Moratorium Feb 06, 2012
- Liberate OpenGovData Now Feb 01, 2012

U.S. Congress - Text of S.702 as Reported in Senate State Court Interpreter Grant Program Act



