<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for S.Con.Res.82 A concurrent resolution supporting the Local Radio Freedom Act.</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sc82/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sc82/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-08-09T20:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/50614</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Clear Channel Using Local Cred. to Push Legislation</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenCongressCongressGossipBlog/~3/360949426/598-Clear-Channel-Using-Local-Cred-to-Push-Legislation-" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-09:/commentary/2804905</id>
    <updated>2008-08-09T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>OpenCongress</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...And members of Congress are actually buying into it.
Of course, there&#8217;s nothing &#8220;local&#8221; about Clear Channel. They are the country&#8217;s largest radio conglomerate, owning over 1,200 stations. They probably own all the big stations in your area; you &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenCongressCongressGossipBlog/~3/360949426/598-Clear-Channel-Using-Local-Cred-to-Push-Legislation-&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Clear Channel Using Local Cred. to Push Legislation</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/articles/view/598-Clear-Channel-Using-Local-Cred-to-Push-Legislation-" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-08:/commentary/2645961</id>
    <updated>2008-08-08T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Open Congress : Congress Gossip Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The bill referred to in the letter, S.Con.Res.82, also known as the Local Radio Freedom Act, is a counter measure to another bill in Congress, the Performance Rights Act, which would require AM and FM stations to pay royalties to the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/articles/view/598-Clear-Channel-Using-Local-Cred-to-Push-Legislation-&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>M.E.L.O.N.: Copyright: Perform. Rights vs. Local Radio Freedom Act</title>
    <link href="http://beatblog.typepad.com/melon/2008/07/copyright-perfo.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-30:/commentary/3353210</id>
    <updated>2008-06-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The MELON Feed </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Over a year and a half later, on May 12, 2008, Senate followed suit and introduced S. Con. Res. 82, with identical language and the support of twelve Senators, which is lead by Sen. Lincoln (D-AR). The Local Radio Freedom Act has ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://beatblog.typepad.com/melon/2008/07/copyright-perfo.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A happier Tuesday still&#226;&#8364;&#166;</title>
    <link href="http://www.justablogsite.com/?p=95" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-30:/commentary/2420035</id>
    <updated>2008-06-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Just a Blog Site </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
To be a community, there must be individuals that find the &#226;&#8364;&#339;area&#226;&#8364;* interesting. I don&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t like to blow my own horn often, but I am proud of what this place is shaping up to be. It is growing even beyond our original concepts and is even ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.justablogsite.com/?p=95&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House Subcommittee Passes Royalty Bill, NAB Girds For War On House ...</title>
    <link href="http://twinportsmedia.blogspot.com/2008/06/house-subcommittee-passes-royalty-bill.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-25:/commentary/2417856</id>
    <updated>2008-06-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Twin Ports Media Blog &#169; </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A companion resolution, S. Con. Res. 82, has been introduced in the Senate and is supported by 13 senators. Called The Local Radio Freedom Act, it reads &amp;quot;Congress should not impose any new performance fee, tax, royalty, or other charge ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://twinportsmedia.blogspot.com/2008/06/house-subcommittee-passes-royalty-bill.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NAB Ad Thanks 218 Congress Members for LRFA Support</title>
    <link href="http://news.radio-online.com/cgi-bin/$rol.exe/headline_id=b10944" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-10:/commentary/2317929</id>
    <updated>2008-06-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>RADIO ONLINE News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Res. 244 and S. Con. Res. 82, aka the Local Radio Freedom Act. Both resolutions oppose proposed legislation that would require broadcasters to compensate record labels for local radio airplay of music.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.radio-online.com/cgi-bin/$rol.exe/headline_id=b10944&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>scannin' the senate</title>
    <link href="http://the-unmutual.blogspot.com/2008/05/scannin-senate.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-20:/commentary/3130977</id>
    <updated>2008-05-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CE Conversations </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
what's more interesting is that webb cosponsored s.con.res.82 supporting the local radio freedom act. that resolution basically said that record labels shouldn't charge performance royalties to radio broadcasters. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://the-unmutual.blogspot.com/2008/05/scannin-senate.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. Con. Res. 82: A concurrent resolution supporting the Local ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sc110-82" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-13:/commentary/3353208</id>
    <updated>2008-05-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Tracked by GovTrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the US Congress: A concurrent resolution supporting the Local Radio Freedom Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sc110-82&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.Con.Res.82 A concurrent resolution supporting the Local Radio ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sc82/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-13:/commentary/2201533</id>
    <updated>2008-05-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Open Congress : Top 20 Bills Most Written... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A concurrent resolution supporting the Local Radio Freedom Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sc82/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RIAA is trying to ruin things again</title>
    <link href="http://www.justablogsite.com/?p=40" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-12:/commentary/2196806</id>
    <updated>2008-05-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Just a Blog Site </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
82: Blanche Lincoln (D-AR), Roger Wicker (R-MS), Wayne Allard (R-CO), Sam Brownback (R-KS), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Jim Webb (D-VA) &#226;&#8364;&#8220; If your Senator has sponsored S. Con. Res. 82 THANK them and if they did NOT urge ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.justablogsite.com/?p=40&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

