<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for S.J.Res.21 A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections.</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sj21/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sj21/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-12-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/46850</id>
  <entry>
    <title>The Case for Congressional Term Limits</title>
    <link href="http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/12/27/045144.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-27:/commentary/3839654</id>
    <updated>2008-12-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Blogcritics </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Congressional term limits : report together with additional and minority views (to accompany S.J. Res. 21) (SuDoc Y 1.1/5:104-158) U.S. Congressional Budget Office Book,. The Case for Congressional Term Limits: Published: December 27, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/12/27/045144.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>votesmart.org part:2</title>
    <link href="http://facecomics.blogspot.com/2008/08/votesmartorg-part2.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-23:/commentary/3139704</id>
    <updated>2008-08-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>facecomics </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
sj res 21, y, cloture not invoked - senate (58 - 42). 07/28/1995, senate gift reform resolution s res 158, y, resolution passed - senate (98 - 0). 07/25/1995, lobbying disclosure act of 1995 s 1060, y, bill passed - senate ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://facecomics.blogspot.com/2008/08/votesmartorg-part2.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Constitutional Amendment To Regulate Campaign Cash?</title>
    <link href="http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/07/19/a-constitutional-amendment-to-regulate-campaign-cash/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-19:/commentary/2513100</id>
    <updated>2008-07-19T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Irregular Times: News Unfit for Print </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Nine months ago, an odd collection of senators: Charles Schumer, Arlen Specter, Thad Cochran and Tom Harkin, introduced SJRES.21, a proposed amendment to the Constitution of the United States that would make campaign finance regulations ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/07/19/a-constitutional-amendment-to-regulate-campaign-cash/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>High Court Ruling May Revive Push for Campaign Finance Amendment</title>
    <link href="http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&amp;amp;orgId=574&amp;amp;topicId=100020219&amp;amp;docId=l:820414466&amp;amp;isRss=true" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/2476651</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Supreme Court </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Valeo, which equated money with political speech. Some in Congress were already disenchanted with Buckley v. Valeo. Sens. Charles E. Schumer, DN.Y., and Arlen Specter, R-Pa., want to overturn it with a constitutional amendment (SJ Res 21).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&amp;amp;orgId=574&amp;amp;topicId=100020219&amp;amp;docId=l:820414466&amp;amp;isRss=true&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Specter Works to Hinder Free Speech</title>
    <link href="http://defeatspecter.blogspot.com/2008/06/specter-works-to-hinder-free-speech.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/2403631</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Defeat Specter </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Y., and Arlen Specter , R-Pa., want to overturn it with a constitutional amendment (SJ Res 21). &#226;&#8364;&#339;It is clear the only way to preserve meaningful campaign finance reform is to repeal the Buckley v. Valeo ruling, one of the court&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s worst ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://defeatspecter.blogspot.com/2008/06/specter-works-to-hinder-free-speech.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>High Court Ruling May Revive Push for Campaign Finance Amendment</title>
    <link href="http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&amp;amp;orgId=574&amp;amp;topicId=100020219&amp;amp;docId=l:816955534&amp;amp;isRss=true" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/2434594</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Supreme Court </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Valeo, which equated money with political speech. Some in Congress were already disenchanted with Buckley v. Valeo. Sens. Charles E. Schumer, DN.Y., and Arlen Specter, R-Pa., want to overturn it with a constitutional amendment (SJ Res 21).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&amp;amp;orgId=574&amp;amp;topicId=100020219&amp;amp;docId=l:816955534&amp;amp;isRss=true&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WashingtonWatch.com - H. J. Res. 61, Proposing an amendment to the ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HJ_61.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-11-02:/commentary/3396265</id>
    <updated>2007-11-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Welcome to WashingtonWatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
See Related Bills:. A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections (S. J. Res. 21). See Bills on the Same Subject: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HJ_61.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Action: Introduced: SJRes. 21: A joint resolution proposing ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sj110-21" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-17:/commentary/1252096</id>
    <updated>2007-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Tracked by GovTrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Charles Schumer [D-NY] introduced SJRes. 21: A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections. [This event matched these trackers: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sj110-21&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Introduced: SJRes.21 A joint resolution proposing an ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sj21/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-17:/commentary/1663832</id>
    <updated>2007-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Open Congress : Major Bill Actions in Campaign... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sj21/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SJ Res. 21, A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SJ_21.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-17:/commentary/1252373</id>
    <updated>2007-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Welcome to WashingtonWatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SJ Res. 21 would propose an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SJ_21.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
