<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for S.J.Res.26 A joint resolution supporting a base Defense Budget that at the very minimum matches 4 percent of gross domestic product.</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sj26/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sj26/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-12-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/47745</id>
  <entry>
    <title>CQ Politics | New Study Calculates the Costs of the War on Terror</title>
    <link href="http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=hsnews-000002997992" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-16:/commentary/3766261</id>
    <updated>2008-12-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Top Stories from CQ </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
C., introduced a joint resolution ( H J Res 67 , S J Res 26 ) that would require a minimal defense budget equal to 4 percent of GDP. The report drew on analyses of the Defense Department, Congressional Research Service, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=hsnews-000002997992&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CQ Politics | New Study Calculates the Costs of the War on Terror</title>
    <link href="http://www.cqpolitics.com/hsnews-000002997992" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-16:/commentary/3711228</id>
    <updated>2008-12-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Top Stories from CQ </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
C., introduced a joint resolution ( H J Res 67 , S J Res 26 ) that would require a minimal defense budget equal to 4 percent of GDP. The report drew on analyses of the Defense Department, Congressional Research Service, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cqpolitics.com/hsnews-000002997992&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Balancing strategy and budgets</title>
    <link href="http://www.heritage.org/press/commentary/ed101408.cfm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-02:/commentary/3393420</id>
    <updated>2008-11-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Heritage Foundation Papers </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
67 and S.J. Res. 26) introduced last year by Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., and Sen. Elizabeth Dole, R-N.C., seeks to fund America's military at roughly today's levels. Rep. Jim Saxton, R-N.J., introduced an amendment to Section 1070 of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heritage.org/press/commentary/ed101408.cfm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Liddy's Money Part Two: The Neocon War Machine | BlueNC</title>
    <link href="http://www.bluenc.com/liddys-money-part-two:-the-neocon-war-machine" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-14:/commentary/3830261</id>
    <updated>2008-08-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BlueNC </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Taking their cue from this growing support, Senator Elizabeth Dole (R-NC) and Representative Trent Franks (R-AZ) introduced a joint resolution (SJ Res. 26, HJ Res. 67) in December 2007 stating that the United States should &quot;commit a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bluenc.com/liddys-money-part-two:-the-neocon-war-machine&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dole's Democratic cosponsors in '07-'08</title>
    <link href="http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/doles_democratic_cosponsors_in_07_08" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-24:/commentary/4609550</id>
    <updated>2008-06-24T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Under the Dome blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
How bipartisan has US Sen. Elizabeth Dole been? With the candidates for Senate touting their ability to bridge the partisan divide, Dome decided to take a closer look. One measure is the number of Democrats who signed onto legislation ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/doles_democratic_cosponsors_in_07_08&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation:</title>
    <link href="http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/policy/securityspending/articles/tying_spending_to_gdp_bad_policy/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-14:/commentary/3393423</id>
    <updated>2008-04-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Taking their cue from this growing support, Senator Elizabeth Dole (R-NC) and Representative Trent Franks (R-AZ) introduced a joint resolution (SJ Res. 26, HJ Res. 67) in December 2007 stating that the United States should &quot;commit a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/policy/securityspending/articles/tying_spending_to_gdp_bad_policy/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Defense Allies Push GDP-Tied Funds | Young Professionals in ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.ypfp.org/defense_allies_push_gdp_tied_funds" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-15:/commentary/3393422</id>
    <updated>2008-02-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Young Professionals in Foreign Policy </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
C., introduced a joint resolution (H J Res 67, S J Res 26) that would require the defense base budget to equal 4 percent of GDP, at a minimum. Democrats and budget experts criticize the idea as fiscally irresponsible and out of line ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ypfp.org/defense_allies_push_gdp_tied_funds&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Providing for the Common Defense: Four Percent for Freedom by Jim ...</title>
    <link href="http://intermexfreemarket.blogspot.com/2007/12/providing-for-common-defense-four.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-14:/commentary/1386433</id>
    <updated>2007-12-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>INTERMEX POWER </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
67 and SJ Res. 26) that supports a baseline defense budget of 4 percent of GDP in light of current budget projections that show defense spending falling to just 3.2 percent of GDP by 2012. This legislation astutely notes that demands on ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://intermexfreemarket.blogspot.com/2007/12/providing-for-common-defense-four.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Providing for the Common Defense: Four Percent for Freedom by Jim ...</title>
    <link href="http://laticonomics.blogspot.com/2007/12/providing-for-common-defense-four.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-14:/commentary/1385740</id>
    <updated>2007-12-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>LATICONOMICS </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
67 and SJ Res. 26) that supports a baseline defense budget of 4 percent of GDP in light of current budget projections that show defense spending falling to just 3.2 percent of GDP by 2012. This legislation astutely notes that demands on ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://laticonomics.blogspot.com/2007/12/providing-for-common-defense-four.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Providing for the Common Defense: Four Percent for Freedom</title>
    <link href="http://www.heritage.org/research/nationalsecurity/em1028.cfm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-11:/commentary/3393421</id>
    <updated>2007-12-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Heritage Foundation Papers: Asia </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
67 and S.J. Res. 26) that supports a baseline defense budget of 4 percent of GDP in light of current budget projections that show defense spending falling to just 3.2 percent of GDP by 2012. This legislation astutely notes that demands ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heritage.org/research/nationalsecurity/em1028.cfm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Action: Introduced: SJRes. 26: A joint resolution supporting ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sj110-26" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-06:/commentary/1385739</id>
    <updated>2007-12-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Tracked by govtrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Sen. Elizabeth Dole [R-NC] introduced SJRes. 26: A joint resolution supporting a base Defense Budget that at the very minimum matches 4 percent of gross domestic product. [This event matched these trackers: Active Legislation ]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sj110-26&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
