S.J.Res.27 - A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to the line item veto.
view all titles (1)All Bill Titles
- Official: A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to the line item veto. as introduced.
This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.
Bill's Views
- Today: 2
- Past Seven Days: 7
- All-Time: 1,350
|
|
|
|
Committees
Official Summary
12/11/2007--Introduced.Constitutional Amendment - Authorizes the President to make a line item veto of any appropriation in any bill, order, resolution, or vote presented for signature into law. Declares that any legislation the President approves and signs, after being amended with a lineOfficial Summary
12/11/2007--Introduced.Constitutional Amendment - Authorizes the President to make a line item veto of any appropriation in any bill, order, resolution, or vote presented for signature into law. Declares that any legislation the President approves and signs, after being amended with a line item veto, shall become law as so modified. Requires the President to return those portions of the legislation that contain reduced or disapproved appropriations, with objections, to the House where such legislation originated. Authorizes Congress to separately consider any reduced or disapproved appropriations in the manner prescribed under section 7 of Article I for vetoed bills.
...Read the Rest
Recent News Coverage
Hmmmm, no news coverage found for this bill at this time. This means that this this bill has not yet been mentioned on a publicly-searchable news website by either its official number (for example, "H.R. 3200") or title (for example, "America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009"). As soon as that changes, our daily automated search across the Web will catch it and include it here. If this bill is of interest to you, you can write a letter to the editor referring to this bill by name, and if your letter is published on the Web, a link back your letter will appear here within about one day. Or, if you know of a news article about this bill to display here, email us the web address of this page and the web address of your suggested news article: Our editorial team will post relevant links as quickly as possible. Thanks for helping to build public knowledge about Congress.
Recent Blog Coverage
Dodd Challenges Edwards On NAFTA, Astonishingly Misses The Point ...
For example (and there are plenty of others), Edwards voted against S.J. Res. 27, which was a resolution âdisapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations treatment) to the products of the Peopleâs ...
Vision vs. Pandering: Why Duncan Hunter is the ONLY choice â Part 1
Thompson himself â and voted in favor of MFN (SJRes. 27). Then, during the 2000 debate to give Bill Clinton his coveted Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) for the chicoms, Fred teamed with Robert Toricelli to put in a poison pill ...
Pre-Primary Must Read For Republicans
Thompson himself â and voted in favor of MFN (SJRes. 27). Then, during the 2000 debate to give Bill Clinton his coveted Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) for the chicoms, Fred teamed with Robert Toricelli to put in a poison pill ...
Users tracking S.J.Res.27 (2) are also tracking:
| Bills | People |
|---|---|
|

U.S. Congress - S.J.Res.27 A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States rela...



