<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for S.J.Res.27 A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to the line item veto.</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sj27/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sj27/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-02-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/47866</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Dodd Challenges Edwards On NAFTA, Astonishingly Misses The Point ...</title>
    <link href="http://2008central.net/2007/12/08/dodd-challenges-edwards-on-nafta-astonishingly-misses-the-point/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-21:/commentary/3393341</id>
    <updated>2008-02-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>2008Central.net &#187; 2008 Election </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
For example (and there are plenty of others), Edwards voted against S.J. Res. 27, which was a resolution &#226;&#8364;&#339;disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations treatment) to the products of the People&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://2008central.net/2007/12/08/dodd-challenges-edwards-on-nafta-astonishingly-misses-the-point/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Vision vs. Pandering: Why Duncan Hunter is the ONLY choice &#226;&#8364;&#8220; Part 1</title>
    <link href="http://gohunter08.blogspot.com/2007/12/vision-vs-pandering-why-duncan-hunter.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-27:/commentary/1392233</id>
    <updated>2007-12-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Duncan Hunter For President 2008...Info And Polls </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Thompson himself &#226;&#8364;&#8220; and voted in favor of MFN (SJRes. 27). Then, during the 2000 debate to give Bill Clinton his coveted Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) for the chicoms, Fred teamed with Robert Toricelli to put in a poison pill ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gohunter08.blogspot.com/2007/12/vision-vs-pandering-why-duncan-hunter.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pre-Primary Must Read For Republicans</title>
    <link href="http://redstaterusa.blogspot.com/2007/12/pre-primary-must-read-for-republicans.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-24:/commentary/1391524</id>
    <updated>2007-12-24T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Red Stater </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Thompson himself &#226;&#8364;&#8220; and voted in favor of MFN (SJRes. 27). Then, during the 2000 debate to give Bill Clinton his coveted Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) for the chicoms, Fred teamed with Robert Toricelli to put in a poison pill ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://redstaterusa.blogspot.com/2007/12/pre-primary-must-read-for-republicans.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Vision vs. Pandering: Why Duncan Hunter is the ONLY choice &#226;&#8364;&#8220; Part 1</title>
    <link href="http://dhgrassrevolt.wordpress.com/2007/12/24/vision-vs-pandering-why-duncan-hunter-is-the-only-choice-%E2%80%93-part-1/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-23:/commentary/1391333</id>
    <updated>2007-12-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Duncan Hunter Grass-Revolt: Unofficial... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Thompson himself &#226;&#8364;&#8220; and voted in favor of MFN (SJRes. 27). Then, during the 2000 debate to give Bill Clinton his coveted Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) for the chicoms, Fred teamed with Robert Toricelli to put in a poison pill ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dhgrassrevolt.wordpress.com/2007/12/24/vision-vs-pandering-why-duncan-hunter-is-the-only-choice-%E2%80%93-part-1/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Action: Introduced: SJRes. 27: A joint resolution proposing ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sj110-27" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-10:/commentary/1385107</id>
    <updated>2007-12-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Tracked by GovTrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Sen. Elizabeth Dole [R-NC] introduced SJRes. 27: A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to the line item veto. [This event matched these trackers: Active Legislation ]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sj110-27&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
