<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for S.J.Res.43 Marriage Protection Amendment</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sj43/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sj43/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-12-11T19:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/51483</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Drinking Liberally in New Milford: Are the Big Banks Completely ...</title>
    <link href="http://drinkliberal.blogspot.com/2008/12/are-big-banks-completely-bankrupt.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-11:/commentary/3817032</id>
    <updated>2008-12-11T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Drinking Liberally in New Milford </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity&#226;&#8364;* &#226;&#8364;&#8221; have named themselves as co-sponsors of S.J. Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://drinkliberal.blogspot.com/2008/12/are-big-banks-completely-bankrupt.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Drinking Liberally in New Milford: GOP Declares War on American ...</title>
    <link href="http://drinkliberal.blogspot.com/2008/12/gop-declares-war-on-american-economy.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-10:/commentary/3707349</id>
    <updated>2008-12-10T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Drinking Liberally in New Milford </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Republicans spent the last eight years like drunken sailors on their first shore leave after years at sea. They wantonly drained the treasury of billions and billions of dollars on harebrained schemes to induce &quot;birthpangs of democracy&quot; ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://drinkliberal.blogspot.com/2008/12/gop-declares-war-on-american-economy.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Drinking Liberally in New Milford: Cheney and Gonzales Indicted in ...</title>
    <link href="http://drinkliberal.blogspot.com/2008/11/cheney-and-gonzales-indicted-in-texas.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-17:/commentary/3469246</id>
    <updated>2008-11-17T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Drinking Liberally in New Milford </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity&#226;&#8364;* &#226;&#8364;&#8221; have named themselves as co-sponsors of S.J. Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://drinkliberal.blogspot.com/2008/11/cheney-and-gonzales-indicted-in-texas.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Drinking Liberally in New Milford: Senator Pat Leahy Makes Me Miss ...</title>
    <link href="http://drinkliberal.blogspot.com/2008/11/senator-pat-leahy-makes-me-miss-vermont.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-13:/commentary/3387405</id>
    <updated>2008-11-13T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Drinking Liberally in New Milford </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity&#226;&#8364;* &#226;&#8364;&#8221; have named themselves as co-sponsors of S.J. Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://drinkliberal.blogspot.com/2008/11/senator-pat-leahy-makes-me-miss-vermont.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Drinking Liberally in New Milford: Happily Retiring My McCain Coat ...</title>
    <link href="http://drinkliberal.blogspot.com/2008/11/happily-retiring-my-mccain-coat-hanger.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-06:/commentary/3582232</id>
    <updated>2008-11-06T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Drinking Liberally in New Milford </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity&#226;&#8364;* &#226;&#8364;&#8221; have named themselves as co-sponsors of S.J. Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://drinkliberal.blogspot.com/2008/11/happily-retiring-my-mccain-coat-hanger.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bob Cesca's Goddamn Awesome Blog! Go!: Funny</title>
    <link href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2008/11/funny.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-03:/commentary/3347055</id>
    <updated>2008-11-03T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bob Cesca's Goddamn Awesome Blog! Go! </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This is the same madness that offers co-sponsors of S. J. RES. 43, dubbed the Marriage Protection Amendment notorious philanderer David Vitter and admitted gay-sex solicitor Larry Craig, both of the republican party. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2008/11/funny.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Drinking Liberally in New Milford: Prop (H)8 in California</title>
    <link href="http://drinkliberal.blogspot.com/2008/11/prop-h8-in-california.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-01:/commentary/3546103</id>
    <updated>2008-11-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Drinking Liberally in New Milford </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity&#226;&#8364;* &#226;&#8364;&#8221; have named themselves as co-sponsors of S.J. Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://drinkliberal.blogspot.com/2008/11/prop-h8-in-california.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Wonk Room &#194;&#187; Vitter - The Only Senator Opposing Removal Of HIV ...</title>
    <link href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/06/27/vitter-pepfar/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-25:/commentary/3865549</id>
    <updated>2008-09-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Wonk Room </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig (R-ID), signed up to co-sponsor S.J. Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the Constitution to declare that marriage &#226;&#8364;&#339;shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman.&#226;&#8364;* ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/06/27/vitter-pepfar/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The August Recess and You</title>
    <link href="http://erlc.com/article/the-august-recess-and-you" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-11:/commentary/3347057</id>
    <updated>2008-08-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Ethics &amp; Religious Liberty Commission | News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Its Senate companion is S. J. Res. 43. Your senators need to support this amendment as well. Ask your senators to help pass:. Health: The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, S. 625. This bill will give the FDA the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://erlc.com/article/the-august-recess-and-you&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>edwards admits to affair</title>
    <link href="http://thatsrightnate.com/2008/08/08/edwards-admits-to-affair/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-07:/commentary/3126212</id>
    <updated>2008-08-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>That&amp;#39;s Right Nate </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
for those few democrats that want to uphold the sanctity of the american family, i reccomend getting onboard with congressmen like david vitter and larry craig who are co-sponsoring sj res 43&#226;&#8364;&#8220;a joint resolution to propose a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thatsrightnate.com/2008/08/08/edwards-admits-to-affair/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>You&#226;&#8364;&#8482;re Doing Something Right | Oliver Willis</title>
    <link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/24/youre-doing-something-right/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-29:/commentary/3387406</id>
    <updated>2008-07-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Oliver Willis </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter&#226;&#8364;&#166; have named themselves as co-sponsors of S.J. Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the Constitution to declare that marriage &#226;&#8364;&#339;shall consist only of the union of a man ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/24/youre-doing-something-right/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The spokesman for American theofascism speaks</title>
    <link href="http://the-internet-post.blogspot.com/2008/07/spokesman-for-american-theofascism.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-28:/commentary/2576584</id>
    <updated>2008-07-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Internet Post </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Two of the senators who &#226;&#8364;&#339;have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ RES. 43&#226;&#8364;* are particularly noteworthy: Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID), who was arrested June 11, 2007 on charges of lewd conduct in a Minneapolis airport terminal, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://the-internet-post.blogspot.com/2008/07/spokesman-for-american-theofascism.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reid writes DOUBLESPEAK! at Desert Conservative</title>
    <link href="http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/07/18/2022/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-15:/commentary/3387404</id>
    <updated>2008-07-15T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Desert Conservative </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Thank you for contacting me regarding the Marriage Protection Amendment (S.J. RES. 43). I appreciate hearing from you. The Marriage Protection Amendment of 2008, introduced by Senator Roger Wicker [R-MS] on June 25, 2008, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/07/18/2022/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Democratic Party</title>
    <link href="http://www.democrats.org/a/2008/07/morning_open_th_76.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-13:/commentary/3347065</id>
    <updated>2008-07-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Democratic National Committee: Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators Larry Craig and David Vitter are co-sponsors of S. J. Res. 43: &quot;A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage.&quot; As ThinkProgress puts it: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democrats.org/a/2008/07/morning_open_th_76.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Irony: Irony</title>
    <link href="http://irony3.blogspot.com/2008/06/irony_30.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-12:/commentary/3890433</id>
    <updated>2008-07-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Irony </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ RES. 43, dubbed the Marriage Protection Amendment. If ratified, the bill would amend the United . ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://irony3.blogspot.com/2008/06/irony_30.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>there's public officials all over the place!</title>
    <link href="http://madiantin.blogspot.com/2008/07/theres-public-officials-all-over-place.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-10:/commentary/3126216</id>
    <updated>2008-07-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Wanderer in a Strange Land </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
thank you for taking the time to contact my office regarding sjres.43, a joint resolution proposing an amendment to the constitution of the united states relating to marriage. your input is important to me, and i appreciate the time you ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://madiantin.blogspot.com/2008/07/theres-public-officials-all-over-place.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>opencongress.org</title>
    <link href="http://drpaleophd.blogspot.com/2008/07/opencongressorg.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-10:/commentary/3126213</id>
    <updated>2008-07-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Books, Bones, Bricks, and Bullets </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... constitution of the united states relating to parental rights. hjres.96 proposing an amendment to the constitution of the united states to permit the penalty of death for the rape of a child. sjres.43 marriage protection amendment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://drpaleophd.blogspot.com/2008/07/opencongressorg.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>LA-Sen: Vitter Gives Us A Good Laugh</title>
    <link href="http://www.dailykingfish.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=781" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-08:/commentary/2464631</id>
    <updated>2008-07-08T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Kingfish - Front Page </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
So it seems that Senator Craig and our very own, super-committed to marriage Sinator Vitter have resolved to introduce SJ RES. 43, which is a proposed Amendment to the United States Constitution. David Brignac hit on this earlier, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykingfish.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=781&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>This Droid's Life: Politics - Define irony</title>
    <link href="http://beepwhirbeep.blogspot.com/2008/06/politics-define-irony.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-04:/commentary/3347063</id>
    <updated>2008-07-04T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>This Droid's Life </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter have named themselves as co-sponsors of S.J. Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the Constitution to declare that marriage &#226;&#8364;&#339;shall consist only of the union of a man ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://beepwhirbeep.blogspot.com/2008/06/politics-define-irony.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sens. Larry Craig and David Vitter Co-Sponsor Marriage Protection ...</title>
    <link href="http://bloggernista.com/2008/06/27/sens-larry-craig-and-david-vitter-co-sponsor-marriage-protection-amendment/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-03:/commentary/3387408</id>
    <updated>2008-07-03T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bloggernista </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The full text of S. J. RES. 43 follows:. 110th CONGRESS 2d Session. Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES JUNE 25, 2008. Mr. WICKER (for himself, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bloggernista.com/2008/06/27/sens-larry-craig-and-david-vitter-co-sponsor-marriage-protection-amendment/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Suspect Device: The Blog &#194;&#187; Irony? Chutzpah? There needs to be a ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.suspect-device.com/blog/?p=2332" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-03:/commentary/3373799</id>
    <updated>2008-07-03T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Suspect Device: The Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity&#226;&#8364;* &#226;&#8364;&#8221; have named themselves as co-sponsors of S.J. Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.suspect-device.com/blog/?p=2332&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>THE ODD COUPLE</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/mjstich/NotesFromPolecatCreek/entries/2008/07/03/the-odd-couple/3410" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-02:/commentary/2459379</id>
    <updated>2008-07-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Notes From Polecat Creek </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Placed before the United States Senate for its consideration recently was SJ Res. 43 that has been dubbed the &#226;&#8364;&#339;Marriage Protection Amendment&#226;&#8364;*. If added to the constitution, the state of matrimony in this country would be limited to a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/mjstich/NotesFromPolecatCreek/entries/2008/07/03/the-odd-couple/3410&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Is Obama's Gay Marriage Stand Incoherent? - Blogrunner</title>
    <link href="http://www.blogrunner.com/snapshot/D/4/2/is_obamas_gay_marriage_stand_incoherent/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-01:/commentary/3347064</id>
    <updated>2008-07-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Blogrunner </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As if the left didn't have enough ammo about hypocritical Republicans, we now get this: S. J. Res. 43: A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage But, but&#226;&#8364;&#166;.we need that! ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogrunner.com/snapshot/D/4/2/is_obamas_gay_marriage_stand_incoherent/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Political Funnies</title>
    <link href="http://thepothole.livejournal.com/145176.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-01:/commentary/2569393</id>
    <updated>2008-07-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Babylon Station </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The defense of marriage amendment has been reintroduced in the senate ( SJ Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment). This is the steaming pile that would make it a constitutional amendment that marriage could only be between a man ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thepothole.livejournal.com/145176.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Barbara&amp;#39;s Daily BuzzFlash Minute for July 2, 2008</title>
    <link href="http://leftword.blogdig.net/archives/articles/July2008/02/Barbara_s_Daily_BuzzFlash_Minute_for_July_2__2008.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-01:/commentary/2569390</id>
    <updated>2008-07-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>leftword: The Best Liberal Blog Posts </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
BARBARA&amp;#39;S DAILY BUZZFLASH MINUTEBookmark/Search this post with: buzzflash | delicious | digg | technorati Technorati Tags: Barbara&amp;#39;s Daily Buzz McCain Bomb Wes Clark Greenspan Oil Iraq Wolfowitz Larry Craig David Vitter SJ Res. 43 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://leftword.blogdig.net/archives/articles/July2008/02/Barbara_s_Daily_BuzzFlash_Minute_for_July_2__2008.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Marriage Protection Amendment., cosponsored by Craig and Vitter</title>
    <link href="http://my.quadsville.com/post/renko/blog/marriage_protection_amendment_cosponsored_by_craig_and_vitt.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-01:/commentary/2442872</id>
    <updated>2008-07-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>America, inc. </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;two Republican United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity&#226;&#8364;* &#226;&#8364;&#8221; have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://my.quadsville.com/post/renko/blog/marriage_protection_amendment_cosponsored_by_craig_and_vitt.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Vitter Irony</title>
    <link href="http://sensen-no-sen.blogspot.com/2008/07/vitter-irony.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-01:/commentary/2438191</id>
    <updated>2008-07-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Sensen No Sen </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On top of this particularly ill-timed foray into the legislative abridgement of personal freedom is the fact that, among the eight cosponsors of SJ Res 43, are Senators David Vitter and Larry Craig. These two men, you may recall - in ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sensen-no-sen.blogspot.com/2008/07/vitter-irony.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Maybe they should just start calling the &amp;quot;Straight Talk Express ...</title>
    <link href="http://cpmazrandommusings.blogspot.com/2008/07/maybe-they-should-just-start-calling.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-01:/commentary/2428809</id>
    <updated>2008-07-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Random Musings </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SJRes. 43 was introduced by Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS). Two of the original cosponsors of the measure (Note: in this context, &amp;#39;original cosponsor&amp;#39; means that they signed on to the bill from the moment it was introduced) - ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cpmazrandommusings.blogspot.com/2008/07/maybe-they-should-just-start-calling.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>sometimes the snarky political commentary just writes itself</title>
    <link href="http://pinstripebindi.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/sometimes-the-snarky-political-commentary-just-writes-itself/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-01:/commentary/2428807</id>
    <updated>2008-07-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>the tomb of the unknown fangirl </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
So a bunch of Sentaors are trying to push through their petty little gay-hating Constitutional ammendment, SJ Res. 43, which would define marriage as between one man and one woman. And 2 of the bill&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s sponsors are Senators Larry &#226;&#8364;&#339;Wide ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://pinstripebindi.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/sometimes-the-snarky-political-commentary-just-writes-itself/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Voices - The spokesman for American theofascism speaks</title>
    <link href="http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2008/07/01/p26630" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-30:/commentary/3373801</id>
    <updated>2008-06-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Voices </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Two of the senators who &#226;&#8364;&#339;have named themselves as co-sponsors of S. J. RES. 43&#226;&#8364;* are particularly noteworthy:. Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID), who was arrested June 11, 2007 on charges of lewd conduct in a Minneapolis airport terminal, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2008/07/01/p26630&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>federal marriage amendment is revived &#226;&#8364;&#8221; with the unlikeliest of co ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.coloradoindependent.com/view/federal-marriage" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-30:/commentary/3126214</id>
    <updated>2008-06-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Blog from Colorado Independent - News you... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
allard, the prime senate sponsor of the federal marriage amendment since 2003 is a mere co-sponsor for the newly introduced version [sj res 43] &#226;&#8364;&#8221; this time led by mississippi sen. roger wicker. allard's four previous attempts to create ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coloradoindependent.com/view/federal-marriage&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Defending the sanctimoniousness of marriage</title>
    <link href="http://rojonoir.livejournal.com/129874.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-30:/commentary/2569391</id>
    <updated>2008-06-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rojonoir </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SJRES.43 Title: A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. Sponsor: Sen Wicker, Roger F. [MS] (introduced 6/25/2008) Cosponsors (9) Latest Major Action: 6/25/2008 Referred to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rojonoir.livejournal.com/129874.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The GOP We&#226;&#8364;&#8482;ve got your family values right hereTwo great men stand ...</title>
    <link href="http://repptide.com/commenting.php?value=4317" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-30:/commentary/2428808</id>
    <updated>2008-06-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>repptide.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Sen Larry Craig Sponsor of SJRES.43 Marriage protection Amendment &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Sen. David VitterSponsor of SJRES.43 &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;The Marriage Protection Amendment&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;if you agree vote up &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://repptide.com/commenting.php?value=4317&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>For editswlinghair</title>
    <link href="http://lynxreign.livejournal.com/419395.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-30:/commentary/2423391</id>
    <updated>2008-06-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Ekpyrotic Universe </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
You want real insanity? Also from Democraticunderground.com. Two United States Senators...have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ RES. 43, dubbed the Marriage Protection Amendment. The Senators? Republicans Larry Craig and David Vitter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lynxreign.livejournal.com/419395.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Larry &amp;quot;Wide Stance&amp;quot; Craig, David &amp;quot;Whoremonger&amp;quot; Vitter Co-Sponsor ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=39938" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-30:/commentary/2423390</id>
    <updated>2008-06-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Political Forum </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SJ Res. 43: A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage Sponsor: Sen. Roger Wicker [R-MS] Cosponsors [as of 2008-06-26] Sen. Wayne Allard [R-CO] Sen. Samuel Brownback [R-KS] ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=39938&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Marriage Protection Experts?</title>
    <link href="http://countrycomestotownblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/marriage-protection-experts.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-30:/commentary/2417601</id>
    <updated>2008-06-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Country Comes To Town </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. Somehow this strikes me as incredibly funny. Can you think of two people less qualified to speak on the issue of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://countrycomestotownblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/marriage-protection-experts.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Hit &amp; Run &gt; They Blame Gay Marriage - Reason Magazine</title>
    <link href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/127256.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-29:/commentary/3347072</id>
    <updated>2008-06-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Reason Magazine - Hit &amp; Run </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators Craig and Vitter co-signed Senator Wicker's bill (S.J.RES.43), as did 7 other Senators. Wicker introduced his bill three days after Senator Broun introduced (S.J.RES.89)to ammend the counstitution. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reason.com/blog/show/127256.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rod 2.0:Beta: Adulterers Larry Craig and David Vitter Co-Sponsor ...</title>
    <link href="http://rodonline.typepad.com/rodonline/2008/06/adulterers-larr.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-29:/commentary/3347066</id>
    <updated>2008-06-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rod 2.0:Beta </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Full text of S. J. RES. 43 here, and, list of co-sponsors, including anti-gay former presidential Sam Brownback and anti-gay global warming denialist James Inhofe. Craig and Vitter co-sponsor Marriage Amendment [P1Q]. More LARRY CRAIG ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rodonline.typepad.com/rodonline/2008/06/adulterers-larr.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>News flash on bathroom shelves</title>
    <link href="http://lighting-stores-info658.blogspot.com/2008/06/news-flash-on-bathroom-shelves.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-29:/commentary/2584394</id>
    <updated>2008-06-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>lighting stores-Info Site </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... beforehand as the following could cause your screen to be obscured: Two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ RES. 43, dubbed the Marriage Protection Amendment. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lighting-stores-info658.blogspot.com/2008/06/news-flash-on-bathroom-shelves.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>4 out 5 Baptist Divorcees Join Senators Craig and Vitter in ...</title>
    <link href="http://secularadl.blogspot.com/2008/06/4-o-ut-5-baptist-divorcees-join.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-29:/commentary/2564556</id>
    <updated>2008-06-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Secular Anti-Defamation League </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
4 out 5 Baptist Divorcees. Join Senators Craig and Vitter in support of SJ Res. 43 Marriage Protection Amendment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://secularadl.blogspot.com/2008/06/4-o-ut-5-baptist-divorcees-join.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Here we go again...</title>
    <link href="http://smaugspot.blogspot.com/2008/06/here-we-go-again.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-29:/commentary/2564555</id>
    <updated>2008-06-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>3 little words </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Bill SJ RES. 43, &amp;quot;Marriage Protection Amendment&amp;quot;. If ratified this bill would amend the US constitution to define marriage and between one man and one woman. Who is the biggest hypocrite here? Vitter who was identified as a client of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://smaugspot.blogspot.com/2008/06/here-we-go-again.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>More news about anxiety support group</title>
    <link href="http://buying-a-business-infoiou.blogspot.com/2008/06/more-news-about-anxiety-support-group_30.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-29:/commentary/2564553</id>
    <updated>2008-06-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>buying a business-Info Site </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... beforehand as the following could cause your screen to be obscured: Two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ RES. 43, dubbed the Marriage Protection Amendment. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://buying-a-business-infoiou.blogspot.com/2008/06/more-news-about-anxiety-support-group_30.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Champions for Marriage</title>
    <link href="http://unmitigatedword.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/the-champions-for-marriage/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-29:/commentary/2459380</id>
    <updated>2008-06-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Unmitigated Word </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Larry Craig and David Vitter &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity&#226;&#8364;* &#226;&#8364;&#8221; have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://unmitigatedword.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/the-champions-for-marriage/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Defend Marriage!!! Now!!!</title>
    <link href="http://lonestartimes.com/2008/06/30/defend-marriage-now/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-29:/commentary/2423392</id>
    <updated>2008-06-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lone Star Times </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SJ Res. 43: A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. But, but&#226;&#8364;&#166;.we need that! Didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t you hear that California is now allowing men to marry men! And women to marry women! ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lonestartimes.com/2008/06/30/defend-marriage-now/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Tea Room Veteran &amp;amp; DC Madam Client Join Hands to Defend Marriage</title>
    <link href="http://pvcentral.net/?p=58" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-29:/commentary/2417604</id>
    <updated>2008-06-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pioneer Valley Central </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This is why I love politics: Two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ RES. 43, dubbed the Marriage Protection Amendment. If ratified, the bill would amend the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://pvcentral.net/?p=58&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Marriage</title>
    <link href="http://ikinman.blogspot.com/2008/06/marriage.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-29:/commentary/2417603</id>
    <updated>2008-06-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>A Good World </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
But apparently the danger to my marriage is still there, as evidenced by the introduction in the United States Senate of SJ Res. 43: A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ikinman.blogspot.com/2008/06/marriage.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Craig &amp;amp; Vitter Co-Sponsors of &amp;quot;Marriage Protection Amendment&amp;quot;</title>
    <link href="http://queah.blogspot.com/2008/07/craig-vitter-co-sponsors-of-protection.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-29:/commentary/2417602</id>
    <updated>2008-06-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Queah&amp;#39;s Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Meanwhile David Vitter (R-LA), was one of the DC Madam&amp;#39;s clients. The two have joined six others as co-sponsors of SJ Res. 43, Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS)&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;Marriage Protection Amendment. Can&amp;#39;t make this !@#$% up . ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://queah.blogspot.com/2008/07/craig-vitter-co-sponsors-of-protection.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SJ Res 43 - &amp;quot;Marriage Protection Amendment&amp;quot;</title>
    <link href="http://sinnfeiner.blogspot.com/2008/06/s-j-res-43-marriage-protection.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-29:/commentary/2417597</id>
    <updated>2008-06-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Abiding Sense of Tragedy </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ RES. 43, dubbed the Marriage Protection Amendment. If ratified, the bill would amend the United States Constitution to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sinnfeiner.blogspot.com/2008/06/s-j-res-43-marriage-protection.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Linkfest: Sunday Updates</title>
    <link href="http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/06/linkfest-sunday-updates-63/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-28:/commentary/3546102</id>
    <updated>2008-06-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>A Stitch in Haste </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Sponsors of the Senate version (S.J.Res. 43) reportedly include self-loathing homosexual Larry Craig and adulterer David Vitter in the Senate; the House version (H.J.Res. 89) was introduced in late May and has 67 sponsors, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/06/linkfest-sunday-updates-63/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senators Craig and Vitter stop having gay sex and hiring ...</title>
    <link href="http://thehostess.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/senators-craig-and-vitter-stop-having-gay-sex-and-hiring-prostitutes-to-co-sponser-marriage-protection-amendment/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-28:/commentary/3347062</id>
    <updated>2008-06-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Outskirts </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig, (Idaho) and David Vitter(Louisiana) &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity&#226;&#8364;* &#226;&#8364;&#8221; have named themselves as co-sponsors of S.J. Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehostess.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/senators-craig-and-vitter-stop-having-gay-sex-and-hiring-prostitutes-to-co-sponser-marriage-protection-amendment/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PageOneQ | Sens. Larry Craig and David Vitter co-sponsor Marriage ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.pageoneq.com/news/2008/CraigVitter_0627.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-28:/commentary/3347054</id>
    <updated>2008-06-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PageOneQ.com Latest </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity have named themselves as co-sponsors of S. J. RES. 43, dubbed the Marriage Protection Amendment. If ratified, the bill would amend the United States Constitution to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pageoneq.com/news/2008/CraigVitter_0627.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Defense of Hypocrisy Act</title>
    <link href="http://mikk2.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/defense-of-hypocrisy-act/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-28:/commentary/3126219</id>
    <updated>2008-06-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>HYSTERICAL RAISINS </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SJRES.43 Title: A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. Sponsor: Sen Wicker, Roger F. [MS] (introduced 6/25/200 Cosponsors (9) Latest Major Action: 6/25/2008 Referred to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mikk2.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/defense-of-hypocrisy-act/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>will your voice be heard?</title>
    <link href="http://11smithsforhuckabee.blogspot.com/2008/06/will-your-voice-be-heard.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-28:/commentary/3126215</id>
    <updated>2008-06-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>11 Smiths for Huckabee </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
this past week senator roger wicker (ms) introduced a companion bill, sjres.43, which has gained nine of the needed 30 cosponsors. traditional marriage has been under attack for many years, but this year the enemies of the family have ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://11smithsforhuckabee.blogspot.com/2008/06/will-your-voice-be-heard.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>I&amp;#39;m not an expert on marriage...</title>
    <link href="http://greatmindsthinklikemerainlillie.blogspot.com/2008/06/im-not-expert-on-marriage.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-28:/commentary/2569394</id>
    <updated>2008-06-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Great minds Think Like Me </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
David Vitter (R-LA), fresh from his call-girl scandal, have co-sponsored SJ RES. 43, dubbed the Marriage Protection Amendment, to bar same-sex marriage. They have joined their colleagues to amend the United States Constitution to state ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://greatmindsthinklikemerainlillie.blogspot.com/2008/06/im-not-expert-on-marriage.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Here is the ultimate in hypocrisy!</title>
    <link href="http://hypocrisy.com/2008/06/29/here-is-the-ultimate-in-hypocrisy/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-28:/commentary/2569392</id>
    <updated>2008-06-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Hypocrisy </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s called SJ Res.43. BUT THAT&#226;&#8364;&#8482;S NOT EVEN THE BEST PART, FOLKS. The bill has two unbelievably hypocritical co-sponsors. One is Senator Larry Craig (R-Idaho) and the other Senator David Vitter (R-Louisiana). That&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s rich. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hypocrisy.com/2008/06/29/here-is-the-ultimate-in-hypocrisy/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sens. Craig and Vitter Team Up to Co-sponsor Marriage Protection ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.chrisbird.net/?p=30" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-28:/commentary/2569389</id>
    <updated>2008-06-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Another Goddamn Blog! </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity&#226;&#8364;* &#226;&#8364;&#8221; have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chrisbird.net/?p=30&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Craig-Vitter Amendment</title>
    <link href="http://www.tinyrevolution.com/mt/archives/002393.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-28:/commentary/2423393</id>
    <updated>2008-06-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>A Tiny Revolution </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators Larry Craig and David Vitter are co-sponsors of SJ Res. 43: &amp;quot;A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage.&amp;quot; As ThinkProgress puts it: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tinyrevolution.com/mt/archives/002393.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The &amp;quot;Marriage Amendment&amp;quot;:</title>
    <link href="http://thewell-armedlamb.blogspot.com/2008/06/marriage-amendment.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-28:/commentary/2417607</id>
    <updated>2008-06-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Well-Armed Lamb </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators Larry Craig and David Vitter are co-sponsors of SJ Res. 43: &amp;quot;A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage.&amp;quot; As ThinkProgress puts it: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thewell-armedlamb.blogspot.com/2008/06/marriage-amendment.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Craig and Vetter co-sponsor Marriage Protection Amendment</title>
    <link href="http://drblues.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/craig-and-vetter-co-sponsor-marriage-protection-amendment/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-28:/commentary/2417606</id>
    <updated>2008-06-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Royal Northwest Mounted Valise </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... in office came to its final ignoble end, he joins the only other Republican senator who can compete for &#226;&#8364;&#339;pious hypocrite of the century&#226;&#8364;*, David Vitter (R-LA), in co-sponsoring SJ RES. 43, dubbed the Marriage Protection Amendment. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://drblues.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/craig-and-vetter-co-sponsor-marriage-protection-amendment/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Weekend Quickies &#226;&#8364;&#732;n&#226;&#8364;&#8482; Vids</title>
    <link href="http://skepchick.org/blog/?p=1608" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-28:/commentary/2417605</id>
    <updated>2008-06-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Skepchick </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Vitter and Craig cosponsor Federal Marriage Ammendment- That&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s right, two senators who have been too busy having affairs to protect their own marriages are, &#226;&#8364;&#339;co-sponsors of SJ RES. 43, dubbed the Marriage Protection Amendment. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://skepchick.org/blog/?p=1608&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sacramento News &amp; Review &gt; Blogs &gt; SNOG &gt; You can't make this crap ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.newsreview.com/sacramento/snog/blogs/post?oid=686067" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/3387407</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>SNOG Blog at SN&amp;R </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.J. Res. 43, dubbed by its proponents as the &#226;&#8364;&#339;Marriage Protection Amendment,&#226;&#8364;* would amend the U.S. Constitution to limit marriage to the &#226;&#8364;&#339;union of one man and one woman.&#226;&#8364;* What&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s more, it specifically prohibits the federal governme&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsreview.com/sacramento/snog/blogs/post?oid=686067&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senators Craig and Vitter Team Up to Save Marriage &#194;&#171; JONATHAN TURLEY</title>
    <link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2008/06/28/senators-craig-and-vitter-team-up-to-save-marriage/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/3347058</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>JONATHAN TURLEY </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
David Vitter (R-LA), fresh from his call-girl scandal, have co-sponsored S. J. RES. 43, dubbed the Marriage Protection Amendment, to bar same-sex marriage. They have joined their colleagues to amend the United States Constitution to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://jonathanturley.org/2008/06/28/senators-craig-and-vitter-team-up-to-save-marriage/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>larry craig &amp; david vitter co-sponsor marriage amendment to the ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.dailynewscaster.com/2008/06/28/larry-craig-david-vitter-co-sponsor-marriage-amendment-to-the-constitution/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/3126218</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Newscaster </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
david vitter (r-la) have co-sponsored sj res 43 dubbed the marriage protection bill deemed so important that they wish to have it added to the constitution. funny how sexual deviants in washington can care so much about marriage ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailynewscaster.com/2008/06/28/larry-craig-david-vitter-co-sponsor-marriage-amendment-to-the-constitution/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>All about ingrown hair removal</title>
    <link href="http://german-food-recipes-informj.blogspot.com/2008/06/all-about-ingrown-hair-removal.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/2564554</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>german food recipes-Info Site </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SJ Res. 43 would propose an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. Senator Larry Craig of the infamous Minneapolis airport mensroom incident is co-author of the joint resolution. discount dental plans ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://german-food-recipes-informj.blogspot.com/2008/06/all-about-ingrown-hair-removal.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Everything new on frank sinatra cd</title>
    <link href="http://beauty-supplies-infof8j.blogspot.com/2008/06/everything-new-on-frank-sinatra-cd.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/2564552</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>beauty supplies-Info Site </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SJ Res. 43 would propose an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. Senator Larry Craig of the infamous Minneapolis airport mensroom incident is co-author of the joint resolution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://beauty-supplies-infof8j.blogspot.com/2008/06/everything-new-on-frank-sinatra-cd.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Vitter, Craig Reintroduce Marriage Amendment</title>
    <link href="http://evilorstupid.blogspot.com/2008/06/vitter-craig-reintroduce-marriage.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/2564551</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>bushittinus </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SJ RES. 43. Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES. June 25, 2008. Mr. WICKER (for himself, Mr. VITTER, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. BROWNBACK, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://evilorstupid.blogspot.com/2008/06/vitter-craig-reintroduce-marriage.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Weekly (sort of) Randomness</title>
    <link href="http://fortcollins.livejournal.com/50006.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/2442875</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sola deo gloria </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Several Senators just introduced SJ Res 43, proposing the Marriage Protection Amendment to the United States Constitution. It doesn&amp;#39;t bolster the chances for the amendment&amp;#39;s success that two of the sponsors are Senators Craig and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://fortcollins.livejournal.com/50006.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>*snickers* There&amp;#39;s a joke in here.</title>
    <link href="http://gsa_lj.livejournal.com/1092476.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/2442873</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Community for Gay, Bi, Questioning, and... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter - &amp;quot;two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity&amp;quot; - have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gsa_lj.livejournal.com/1092476.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Richard Noggin Saturday: A Twofer</title>
    <link href="http://buelahman.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/richard-noggin-saturday-a-twofer/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/2433253</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>buelahman&amp;#39;s Redstate Revolt </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity&#226;&#8364;* &#226;&#8364;&#8221; have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://buelahman.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/richard-noggin-saturday-a-twofer/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Marriage Protection Amendment</title>
    <link href="http://weblog.sinteur.com/2008/06/marriage-protection-amendment/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/2423394</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>the Daily Irrelevant </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[Quote:] Two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ RES. 43, dubbed the Marriage Protection Amendment. If ratified, the bill would amend the United States ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.sinteur.com/2008/06/marriage-protection-amendment/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DAWN PATROL; 14 MELNAR 2 AS</title>
    <link href="http://thedisbrimstone-dailypitchfork.blogspot.com/2008/06/dawn-patrol-14-melnar-2-as.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/2417613</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Editorials from Hell&amp;#39;s leading daily newspaper </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
So SJ Res 43 is what the thing is called and it&amp;#39;s pretty straight forward anti gay rights pro marriage and sponsored by two people that have broken their marriage vows based upon rulings of their courts their own signed legal documents ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thedisbrimstone-dailypitchfork.blogspot.com/2008/06/dawn-patrol-14-melnar-2-as.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Stuff that&amp;#39;s so funny I lack the imagination to have made it up</title>
    <link href="http://blyspace.blogspot.com/2008/06/comedy-goldhttpwwwbloggercomimggllinkgi.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/2417612</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bly Space </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators Craig and Vitter are cosponsoring SJ res 43, a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman. Not clear: whether adults wearing diapers or trolling for sex in restroom stalls are specifically ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blyspace.blogspot.com/2008/06/comedy-goldhttpwwwbloggercomimggllinkgi.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>News from the &amp;#39;Net</title>
    <link href="http://www.streetprophets.com/storyonly/2008/6/28/172727/825" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/2417609</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Street Prophets </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity&#226;&#8364;* &#226;&#8364;&#8221; have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.streetprophets.com/storyonly/2008/6/28/172727/825&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SJ Res. 43: A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the ...</title>
    <link href="http://blogrevolution.com/archives/2008/06/28/3884736.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/2417599</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>blogrevolution! </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill is in the first step in the legislative process. Introduced bills go first to committees that deliberate, investigate, and revise them before they go to general debate. The majority of bills never make it out of committee. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogrevolution.com/archives/2008/06/28/3884736.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Blue Fields of Indiana: Toe-Tapper Craig and Diaper Dandy Vitter ...</title>
    <link href="http://lefthandplay.blogspot.com/2008/06/toe-tapper-craig-and-diaper-dandy.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/3865550</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Blue Fields of Indiana </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity have named themselves as co-sponsors of S. J. RES. 43, dubbed the Marriage Protection Amendment. If ratified, the bill would amend the United States Constitution to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lefthandplay.blogspot.com/2008/06/toe-tapper-craig-and-diaper-dandy.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Brad Warthen's Blog: Get into the blues -- WAY into the blues</title>
    <link href="http://blogs.thestate.com/bradwarthensblog/2008/06/get-into-the-bl.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/3637408</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Brad Warthen's Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity&#226;&#8364;* &#226;&#8364;&#8221; have named themselves as co-sponsors of S.J. Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.thestate.com/bradwarthensblog/2008/06/get-into-the-bl.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Craig, Vitter: AC/DC Marriage Protection Amendment | discuss ...</title>
    <link href="http://discuss.epluribusmedia.net/node/1976" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/3597371</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ePluribus Media </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity&#226;&#8364;* &#226;&#8364;&#8221; have named themselves as co-sponsors of S.J. Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://discuss.epluribusmedia.net/node/1976&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WashingtonWatch.com - S. J. Res. 43, A joint resolution proposing ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/200511626.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/3387403</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Welcome to WashingtonWatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
US Congress: SJ Res. 43, A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/200511626.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The hilarious irony of being Republican &#194;&#171; TheZoo</title>
    <link href="http://tpzoo.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/the-hilarious-irony-of-being-republican/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/3373800</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>TheZoo </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity&#226;&#8364;* &#226;&#8364;&#8221; have named themselves as co-sponsors of S. J. RES. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tpzoo.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/the-hilarious-irony-of-being-republican/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Objective - Justice: The Absurdity of the Marriage Amendment</title>
    <link href="http://objectivejustice.blogspot.com/2008/06/absurdity-of-marriage-amendment.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/3347070</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Objective - Justice </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.J. Res. 43 is a Constitutional Amendment that states:. Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither this Constitution, nor the constitution of any State, shall be construed to require ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://objectivejustice.blogspot.com/2008/06/absurdity-of-marriage-amendment.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SNAFU-ed .... Situation Normal: Larry Craig, Daniel Vitter Co ...</title>
    <link href="http://snafu-ed.blogspot.com/2008/06/larry-craig-daniel-vitter-co-sponsors.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/3347061</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>SNAFU-ed .... Situation Normal </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The two have joined six others as co-sponsors of S. J. Res. 43, Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS)'s &quot;Marriage Protection Amendment.&quot; You can't make up stuff this good. Other co-sponsors are: Sen. Wayne Allard (R-CO), Sen. Samuel Brownback (R-KS) .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://snafu-ed.blogspot.com/2008/06/larry-craig-daniel-vitter-co-sponsors.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Vitter, Craig Reintroduce Marriage Amendment | Right Wing Watch</title>
    <link href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/06/vitter_craig_re.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/3347060</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Right Wing Watch </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. J. RES. 43. Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES. June 25, 2008. Mr. WICKER (for himself, Mr. VITTER, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. INHOFE, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/06/vitter_craig_re.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Wide Stance Larry and Canal Street Dave speak out for Republican ...</title>
    <link href="http://earthlingblues.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/wide-stance/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/3126220</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Earthling Blues </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... his traditional marriage much more than his long-term business relationship with prostitute Wendy Cortez &#226;&#8364;&#8226; a relationship for which, Vitter assures us, God has forgiven him. So who are you to criticize? See also:. SJRes.43 (THOMAS) ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://earthlingblues.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/wide-stance/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Protect Your Own Marriage</title>
    <link href="http://whatsleftofthiscountry.blogspot.com/2008/06/protect-your-own-marriage.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2740863</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>What&amp;#39;s Left Of This Country </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In the never-ending storyline that is Republican hypocrisy, Senators Larry Craig (R-Wide Stance) and David Vitter (R-Diaper Wearer) have signed on as cosponsors of SJ Res 43, aka the Marriage Protection Amendment. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://whatsleftofthiscountry.blogspot.com/2008/06/protect-your-own-marriage.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SJ RES. 43</title>
    <link href="http://kylecrawford.blogspot.com/2008/06/s-j-res-43.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2671956</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>kyle+blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
OK, let&amp;#39;s walk through this one , slowly. The Republicans in Congress are trying their darnedest to get a bill up and running that would Federalize marriage, one man , one woman; blah, blah, blah. Now, the Democrats are, thank the Gods, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://kylecrawford.blogspot.com/2008/06/s-j-res-43.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Retarded legislation: Congressional edition</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1339624&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2491126</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>821 F.2d 968 OR UNITED STATES of America,... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
110th CONGRESS 2d Session SJ RES. 43 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES ... of the United States relating to marriage. Resolved by the Senate and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1339624&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>If you didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t laugh, you&#226;&#8364;&#8482;d cry: Senators Craig and Vitter co ...</title>
    <link href="http://strategerie.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/if-you-didnt-laugh-youd-cry-senators-craig-and-vitter-co-sponsor-the-marriage-protection-amendment/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2442874</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Little Pink Clubhouse </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter &#226;&#8364;&#8221; two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity &#226;&#8364;&#8221; have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://strategerie.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/if-you-didnt-laugh-youd-cry-senators-craig-and-vitter-co-sponsor-the-marriage-protection-amendment/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Wing house</title>
    <link href="http://substanced.blog.allmusic.tv/2008/06/27/wing-house/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417630</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Substance D </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(pageoneq):two united states senators implicated in extramarital sexual undertaking acquire named themselves as co-sponsors of sj res. 43, dubbed the marriage protection amendment. if ratified, the bill would fix the united states ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://substanced.blog.allmusic.tv/2008/06/27/wing-house/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Republicans Lead By Example Again</title>
    <link href="http://theerant.yuku.com/topic/6423" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417629</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>THEE RANT </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Sens. Larry Craig and David Vitter co-sponsor Marriage Protection Amendment. Two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ RES. 43, dubbed...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://theerant.yuku.com/topic/6423&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Absurdity of the Marriage Amendment</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1340167&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417628</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Ameriquest Mortgage Co - Justia blawgsearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It appears that Senator Craig, (yes, the gay bathroom Senator), and Senator Vitter, (yes, the DC madame Senator), are the co-sponsors of the new &amp;quot;Marriage Protection Act.&amp;quot; SJ Res. 43 is a Constitutional Amendment that states: Marriage ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1340167&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Meet The US Senators That Will Save Our Families</title>
    <link href="http://brickbatblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/meet-us-senators-that-will-save-our.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417627</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>brickbat </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
GOP SJ Res. 43 was introduced yesterday. Guess who cosponsered? This guy. And this guy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://brickbatblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/meet-us-senators-that-will-save-our.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sens. Craig and Vitter team up to co-sponsor Marriage Protection ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.nowpublic.com/world/sens-craig-and-vitter-team-co-sponsor-marriage-protection-amendment" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417626</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Politics - stories: just in </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity&#226;&#8364;* &#226;&#8364;&#8221; have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the... read more.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nowpublic.com/world/sens-craig-and-vitter-team-co-sponsor-marriage-protection-amendment&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Oh, this is rich...</title>
    <link href="http://www.somegoodthing.com/post/40097320" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417625</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>some good thing </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... nor the constitution of any State, shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the union of a man and a woman. It was submitted to the Senate as SJ Res 43. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.somegoodthing.com/post/40097320&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Retarded legislation: Congressional edition</title>
    <link href="http://www.supremedicta.com/2008/06/retarded-legislation-congressional.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417624</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Supreme Dicta </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SJ RES. 43. Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES. JUNE 25, 2008. Mr. WICKER (for himself, Mr. VITTER, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.supremedicta.com/2008/06/retarded-legislation-congressional.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sens. Larry Craig and David Vitter co-sponsor Marriage Protection ...</title>
    <link href="http://girlacademic.livejournal.com/23337.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417623</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Secretly Fabulous </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&amp;quot;Two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ RES. 43, dubbed the Marriage Protection Amendment. If ratified, the bill would amend the United States Constitution to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://girlacademic.livejournal.com/23337.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Marriage Protection ala Craig and Vitter</title>
    <link href="http://hannah.smith-family.com/?p=2458" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417622</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Hannah&amp;#39;s Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators Craig and Vitter are sponsoring SJ RES. 43, dubbed the Marriage Protection Amendment. If ratified, the bill would amend the United States Constitution to state that marriage &#226;&#8364;&#339;shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hannah.smith-family.com/?p=2458&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Amazing GOP hypocrisy</title>
    <link href="http://dartmouth05.livejournal.com/11926.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417621</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Jedi&amp;#39;s Journal </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The US Senate has a bill called SJ Res 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment, that would amend the Constitution to bar same-sex marriage. First, there&amp;#39;s the sheer chutzpah of the Republicans pushing a Constitutional amendment on a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dartmouth05.livejournal.com/11926.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Two philanderers co-sponsor &amp;quot;Marriage Protection Amendment&amp;quot;...</title>
    <link href="http://theruralbusroute.com/2008/06/two-philanderers-co-sponsor-marriage.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417620</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Rural Bus Route </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
David Vitter (he of high-priced hooker fame) and Larry Craig (he of random, gay, airport bathroom sex solicitation fame) have teamed up to produce SJ Res. 43. The amendment would amend the Constitution to declare that marriage &#226;&#8364;&#339;shall ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://theruralbusroute.com/2008/06/two-philanderers-co-sponsor-marriage.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Karl Rove has company</title>
    <link href="http://thebushwhackedleague.blogspot.com/2008/06/karl-rove-has-company.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417619</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The &amp;quot;Bush&amp;quot;-Whacked Administration </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The two senators are naming themselves as co-sponsors of SJ Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment that, if passed, would amend the Constitution to declare that marriage &#226;&#8364;&#339;shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman.&#226;&#8364;* ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thebushwhackedleague.blogspot.com/2008/06/karl-rove-has-company.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Two sex scandal senators co-sponsor Pro-Marriage act</title>
    <link href="http://linkfilter.net/?id=138933" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417618</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>linkfilter.net - fresh links </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the Constitution to declare that marriage &#226;&#8364;&#339;shall consist only of the union of a man and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://linkfilter.net/?id=138933&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>re: Just because it&amp;#39;s funny</title>
    <link href="http://blogs.jsonline.com/raisingkane/archive/2008/06/26/just-because-it-s-funny.aspx#281471" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417617</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Eugene Kane:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Raising Kane - All Comments </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
How about this news flash: Republican Senators Larry (&amp;quot;Wide Stance&amp;quot;) Craig and David (&amp;quot;Diaper Trick&amp;quot;) Vitter have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ RES. 43, dubbed the Marriage Protection Amendment. If ratified, the bill would amend&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.jsonline.com/raisingkane/archive/2008/06/26/just-because-it-s-funny.aspx#281471&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Vitter, you gotta be shitting us</title>
    <link href="http://righthandthief.blogspot.com/2008/06/vitter-you-gotta-be-shitting-us.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417616</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Your Right Hand Thief </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Larry Craig and David Vitter &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity&#226;&#8364;* &#226;&#8364;&#8221; have named themselves as co-sponsors of SJ Res. 43, the Marriage Protection Amendment. --- Update: They really do make a lovely ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://righthandthief.blogspot.com/2008/06/vitter-you-gotta-be-shitting-us.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>GOP Adulterers Sponsor Sanctity of Marriage Amendment</title>
    <link href="http://www.leftinalabama.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=2023" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417615</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Left In Alabama - Front Page </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The philandering duo are cosponsors of SJ Res. 43, a Marriage Protection Amendment. If passed, the bill would amend the Constitution to declare that marriage shall consist only of the union of a man, a woman, a hooker, and an anonymous ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.leftinalabama.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=2023&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Too Good To Be True</title>
    <link href="http://multi-medium.net/2008/06/27/too-good-to-be-true-2" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417614</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Multi Medium </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Has to be: [C]heck out who introduced/sponsored the latest version of the Constitutional Marriage Amendment: 110th CONGRESS 2d Session SJ RES. 43 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://multi-medium.net/2008/06/27/too-good-to-be-true-2&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>He Is A Superho</title>
    <link href="http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/06/27/vittercraignohomo/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417611</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ATTACKERMAN </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SJ RES. 43. Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES. JUNE 25, 2008. Mr. WICKER (for himself, Mr. VITTER, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. BROWNBACK, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/06/27/vittercraignohomo/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Hypocrites defend traditional marriage</title>
    <link href="http://completedefeasance.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/hypocrites-defend-traditional-marriage/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417610</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Subject to Complete Defeasance </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The oft-proposed, always-failed Federal Marriage Amendment is back in the form of Senate Joint Resolution 43, introduced on June 25:. 110th CONGRESS. 2d Session. SJ RES. 43. Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://completedefeasance.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/hypocrites-defend-traditional-marriage/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SJ Res. 43</title>
    <link href="http://tailrank.com/6510456/S-J-Res-43" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417608</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Tailrank: Top News for Today in Politics </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
View tracked events and feed options for this bill. First, they are used exactly as bills to enact law, generally for limited matters. Used this way, they must be passed by both the House and Senate and must be signed by the President ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tailrank.com/6510456/S-J-Res-43&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>On The Federal Front: SJ Res. 43: - By Mark R. Kerr</title>
    <link href="http://tucsonobserver.blogspot.com/2008/06/on-federal-front-sj-res-43-by-mark-r.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2417598</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Observer - Tucson, Arizona </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
WASHINGTON, DC (Observer Update) - Legislation to adopt a federal constitutional amendment barring legal and governmental recognition of same-sex relationships has been introduced. Senate Joint Resolution (SJ Res. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tucsonobserver.blogspot.com/2008/06/on-federal-front-sj-res-43-by-mark-r.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>quick! someone get steve stivers on the phone!!!</title>
    <link href="http://www.buckeyestateblog.com/quick_someone_get_steve_stivers_on_the_phone" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-25:/commentary/3126211</id>
    <updated>2008-06-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Buckeye State Blog - Pamphleteers of the... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
wicker has introduced sj res 43, which would amend the us constitution to prohibit gay marriage. amongst the eight co-sponsors are toe-tappin' larry craig from idaho, certified wackjob sam brownback from kansas and whoremongering david ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buckeyestateblog.com/quick_someone_get_steve_stivers_on_the_phone&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>bill introduced: sjres.43 marriage protection amendment</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sj43/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-24:/commentary/10807389</id>
    <updated>2008-06-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
a joint resolution proposing an amendment to the constitution of the united states relating to marriage. - &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sj43/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>traditionalwedlock.org</title>
    <link href="http://traditionalwedlock.blogspot.com/2008/06/list-of-websitesforums-and-other.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-23:/commentary/3347056</id>
    <updated>2008-06-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>traditionalwedlock.org </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Daily Senate Co-Sponsor update for S.J. RES. 43:. 7/23/08 - 17 co-sponsors! 7/14/08 - 16 co-sponsors 7/8/08 - 11 co-sponsors 6/27/08 - 9 co-sponsors 6/25/08 - Bill introduced with 8 original co-sponsors ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://traditionalwedlock.blogspot.com/2008/06/list-of-websitesforums-and-other.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>bill action: introduced: sjres. 43: a joint resolution proposing ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sj110-43" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-23:/commentary/3126210</id>
    <updated>2008-06-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Tracked by govtrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
sen. roger wicker [r-ms] introduced sjres. 43: a joint resolution proposing an amendment to the constitution of the united states relating to marriage. [this event matched these trackers: active legislation ]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sj110-43&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SJ Res. 43, A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SJ_43.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-23:/commentary/2417600</id>
    <updated>2008-06-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>washingtonwatch.com - Welcome to washingtonwatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SJ Res. 43 would propose an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage.... Vote on This Bill: For | Against.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SJ_43.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

