2008-11-19T00:00:00Z opencongress.org tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/40398 tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-19:/commentary/3468614 2008-11-19T00:00:00Z Daily Kos January is in fact when the decisions about committee leadership will be formalized by the full Senate, just as was the case in the last Congress, which adopted S. Res. 27 and S. Res. 28 on January 12, 2007. ...<br /><br /><a href="http://feeds.dailykos.com/~r/dailykos/index/~3/2mLvPiAmMFE/663507">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-08:/commentary/3341606 2008-09-08T00:00:00Z Matthew Yglesias Though it’s possible that Joe might jump and try to do something while Ted Kennedy’s away, chairmanship of the committees is set by S. Res. 27, without an ‘escape clause’ like the one in 2001. It would take Extreme Dick Action to change<br /><br /><a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/09/liebermans_ld_quits.php">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-29:/commentary/3341609 2008-04-29T00:00:00Z BlueOregon I direct you to S Res 27, which sets the majority membership of the committees in stone for the duration of the 110th, and S Res 28, which does the same for minority membership. Note that they fix the membership allocation to provide ...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.blueoregon.com/2008/04/competing-narra.html">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-30:/commentary/3174224 2007-07-30T00:00:00Z The Blue Flaming Daily Dammit senate committee organizing resolutions, s.res.27, s.res.28. social security numbers, prevent misuse, s.238, s.699, s.1208, s.1691, hr220, hr948, hr2455, hr3046. spyware, protect internet users from unknowing transmission of personal ...<br /><br /><a href="http://hanielperigueux.blogspot.com/2007/07/want-to-dig-deeper-this-will-also-prove.html">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-16:/commentary/3341613 2007-06-16T00:00:00Z Democratic National Committee: Blog Why that didn't happen is a subject unto itself (you can read about it here), but for today's purposes, what matters is that it didn't, and a new set of organizing resolutions were adopted on January 12th: S. Res. 27 and S. Res. 28. ...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.democrats.org/a/2007/06/saturday_open_t_22.php">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-16:/commentary/869448 2007-06-16T00:00:00Z Political T-Shirts &amp; Apparel Why that didn’t happen is a subject unto itself (you can read about it here), but for today’s purposes, what matters is that it didn’t, and a new set of organizing resolutions were adopted on January 12th: S. Res. 27 and S. Res. 28. ...<br /><br /><a href="http://political-clothing.com/index.php/2007/06/16/about-all-that-lieberman-talk/">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2007-03-03:/commentary/3341608 2007-03-03T00:00:00Z Firedoglake 8) does provide for a shift in control of the Senate if the majority shifts, there is no such language in the organizing resolutions for the present Congress (S. Res. 27 and 28.) reply Reply. Patrick Murphy March 3rd, 2007 at 12:31 pm ...<br /><br /><a href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/03/blue-america-rep-patrick-murphy-pa-08/">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-28:/commentary/345946 2007-02-28T00:00:00Z Daily Kos Political Insider wrote that a Lieberman switch wouldn&#39;t flip the Senate. CTBob picked up on this (we here in Connecticut are still smarting over the election). These are the confirming resolutions:. S. Res. 27 and S. Res 28.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/2/28/63535/9999">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-24:/commentary/3174223 2007-02-24T00:00:00Z just my 2 cents this congress, the 110th, on 12 january 2007 agreed to the committee assignments for the current congress in s.res.27 and s.res.28. it is clear that the organization of the senate this time designated (as expected) the democrats as ...<br /><br /><a href="http://noelles2cents.blogspot.com/2007/02/lieberman-issue-will-it-change-majority.html">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-22:/commentary/320416 2007-02-22T00:00:00Z Obsidian Wings 8) does provide for a shift in control of the Senate if the majority shifts, there is no such language in the organizing resolutions for the present Congress (S. Res. 27 and 28.) Which means that I feel no compunction whatsoever about ...<br /><br /><a href="http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2007/02/civics_lesson.html">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-01:/commentary/3341607 2007-02-01T00:00:00Z GovTrack.us Tracked Events The Republican caucus had meetings over several days after we were in session before finally agreeing on January 12 to S. Res. 27 and S. Res. 28, the resolutions assigning Members to Senate committees. ...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=110-s20070130-15">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2007-01-18:/commentary/214955 2007-01-18T00:00:00Z Internal Monologue This is due to the fact that the Senate passed a resolution on January 12 (S.Res. 27) that designates various Democrats by name as committee chairs and specifies the Democratic members of each committee. The Senate also passed a similar ...<br /><br /><a href="http://zdrake.blogspot.com/2007/01/lieberman-cant-flip-senate-to.html">Go to article</a>