2007-03-03T00:00:00Z opencongress.org tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/39806 tag:opencongress.org,2007-03-03:/commentary/3344787 2007-03-03T00:00:00Z Firedoglake The 107th Congress’s resolution (S. Res. 8) does provide for a shift in control of the Senate if the majority shifts, there is no such language in the organizing resolutions for the present Congress (S. Res. 27 and 28.) reply Reply ...<br /><br /><a href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/03/blue-america-rep-patrick-murphy-pa-08/">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-24:/commentary/3176857 2007-02-24T00:00:00Z just my 2 cents the senate, via s.res.8 of the 107th congress, agreed to this organization. however, there was a provision included in this organizing resolution that if either party were to attain a majority of “whole number of senators” during the ...<br /><br /><a href="http://noelles2cents.blogspot.com/2007/02/lieberman-issue-will-it-change-majority.html">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-22:/commentary/3344788 2007-02-22T00:00:00Z Obsidian Wings I went and checked the Senate's Organizing Resolutions, and it's true: whereas the 107th Congress's resolution (S. Res. 8) does provide for a shift in control of the Senate if the majority shifts, there is no such language in the ...<br /><br /><a href="http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2007/02/civics_lesson.html">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2007-01-03:/commentary/296227 2007-01-03T00:00:00Z Active Legislation -- Monitored by govtrack.us Passed Senate by Unanimous Consent. [This event matched these monitors: Active Legislation ]<br /><br /><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sr110-8">Go to article</a>