The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowH.R.1014 - No Taxation Without Representation Act
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to tax bona fide residents of the District of Columbia in the same manner as bona fide residents of possessions of the United States.
Most commented sections:

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HR 1014 IHCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
111th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
1st SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
H. R. 1014CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to tax bona fide residents of the District of Columbia in the same manner as bona fide residents of possessions of the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
February 12, 2009CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
February 12, 2009CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Mr. GOHMERT (for himself, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. PAUL, Mr. LAMBORN, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, and Mr. HARPER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and MeansCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to tax bona fide residents of the District of Columbia in the same manner as bona fide residents of possessions of the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘No Taxation Without Representation Act’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
The Congress finds the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) The phrase ‘no taxation without representation’ was a rallying cry of many American colonists during the period of British rule in the 1760s and early 1770s. The slogan gained widespread notoriety after the passage of the Sugar Act on April 5, 1764.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) American colonists increasingly resented being levied taxes without having actual legislators seated and voting in Parliament in London. The idea that there should be no taxation without representation dated back even further. Benjamin Franklin stated, ‘it is suppos’d an undoubted Right of Englishmen not to be taxed but by their own Consent given thro’ their Representatives.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) This issue became even more defined in 1765 with the passage of the Stamp Act which was the first true attempt to levy a direct tax on the American colonies. Ultimately the tax was repealed, but the idea of no taxation without representation persisted.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) Article I, section 2, clause 1 of the United States Constitution, states, ‘The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) The Organic Act of 1801 placed Washington, DC, under the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States Congress and people in the District were no longer considered residents of Virginia or Maryland.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) Many in Washington, DC, were immediately opposed to the idea of being taxed without congressional representation and over the years several congressional leaders introduced constitutional amendments to give the District of Columbia voting representation, though none were successful.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(7) In 1898, Puerto Rico was acquired by the United States and currently has a Resident Commissioner with limited voting rights. Section 933 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 exempts bona fide citizens who are residents of Puerto Rico for the entire taxable year from Federal taxes on income earned in Puerto Rico.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(8) On March 31, 1917, the United States took possession of the Virgin Islands and in 1927, the territory’s residents were granted citizenship. Under section 932 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, individuals who are bona fide residents of the United States Virgin Islands during the entire taxable year, and who fully pay all income tax liabilities to the United States Virgin Islands, are not subject to Federal income taxes on their income.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(9) Guam was established as a territory of the United States after the passage of the Guam Organic Act of 1950. Under the provisions of section 935 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, residents of Guam are required to file tax returns with Guam, but not with the United States Federal Government and therefore the residents do not have to pay United States Federal income taxes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(10) The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands was established in 1975 after residents decided not to pursue independence, but instead they opted to enter into territory negotiations. The tax treatment of the Northern Mariana Islands is similar to the structure of Guam in that bona fide residents are not required to pay Federal income taxes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(11) American Samoa, which is technically considered ‘unorganized’ because no Organic Acts have been passed by Congress, is governed by section 931 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Under this section, bona fide year-round residents are exempt from Federal taxes on income they earn in Samoa, Guam, and Northern Mariana Islands, but are subject to Federal taxes on income earned elsewhere.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(12) In keeping with the early history and democratic traditions of the United States, the principles established in the Constitution, and in conformance with the other territories of the United States which have delegates but no Representative, the residents of the District of Columbia should be exempt from paying United States Federal income taxes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 3. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR INCOME FROM SOURCES WITHIN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
(a) In General- Subpart D of part III of subchapter N of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new section:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘SEC. 938. INCOME FROM SOURCES WITHIN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
‘(a) General Rule- In the case of an individual who is a bona fide resident of the District of Columbia during the entire taxable year, gross income shall not include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) income derived from sources within the District of Columbia, andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business by such individual within the District of Columbia.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(b) Deductions, etc. Allocable to Excluded Amounts Not Allowable- An individual shall not be allowed--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) as a deduction from gross income any deductions (other than the deduction under section 151, relating to personal exemptions), orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) any credit, properly allocable or chargeable against amounts excluded from gross income under this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(c) Bona Fide Resident and Other Applicable Rules- For purposes of this section, rules similar to the rules of section 876, 937, 957(c), 3401(a)(8)(D), and 7654 shall apply.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections for subpart D of part III of subchapter N of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new item:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘Sec. 938. Income from sources within the District of Columbia.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Effective Date- The amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this Act.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
Top-Rated Comments
- “Look at section 12) In keeping with the early history and democratic ...” NonSheeple
- “How dare Congress vote themselves a pay raise and then further attempt t...” sophia1966

U.S. Congress - Text of H.R.1014 as Introduced in House No Taxation Without Representation Act



