<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : News Articles for H.R.1020 Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h1020/atom_news" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h1020/news" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2010-06-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/news/55047</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Will Congress kill mandatory arbitration in consumer finance transactions?</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=57065a58-1a4c-4b96-8956-b440c0935feb" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-06-16:/commentary/8547858</id>
    <updated>2010-06-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007 died in committee, but in 2009 was re-introduced in both the House as HR 1020 and the Senate, S. 931, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=57065a58-1a4c-4b96-8956-b440c0935feb&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rape Case Highlights Arbitration Debate</title>
    <link href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105153315" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-06-11:/commentary/5338814</id>
    <updated>2009-06-11T12:39:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NPR</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Arbitration Fairness Act now before Congress would ban clauses that make arbitration mandatory for the resolution of disputes &#8212; restoring to consumers and employees the choice of taking their case to court.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105153315&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Arbitration Fairness Act Gets Support From NASAA</title>
    <link href="http://www.nuwireinvestor.com/articles/the-arbitration-fairness-act-franchisees-may-no-longer-face-forced-53033.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-06-03:/commentary/5338813</id>
    <updated>2009-06-03T12:31:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NuWire Investor - Investment News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The North American Securities Administrators Association, NASAA, announced last week that it fully supports the legislation, introduced as S. 931 by Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI) and H.R. 1020 by Representative Hank Johnson (D-GA)...However, the International Franchise Association, a Washington-based trade and lobbying group representing mainly franchising firms, opposes the Arbitration Fairness Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nuwireinvestor.com/articles/the-arbitration-fairness-act-franchisees-may-no-longer-face-forced-53033.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

