The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowH.R.1069 - Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility Safe Closure Act of 2009
To provide for certain requirements related to the closing of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility.

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HR 1069 IHCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
111th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
1st SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
H. R. 1069CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To provide for certain requirements related to the closing of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
February 13, 2009CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
February 13, 2009CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Mr. CALVERT (for himself, Mr. BILBRAY, Ms. JENKINS, Mr. MILLER of Florida, and Mr. ISSA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed ServicesCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To provide for certain requirements related to the closing of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility Safe Closure Act of 2009’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR CLOSING GUANTANAMO BAY DETENTION FACILITY.
(a) Notification Requirement- The President shall notify the congressional defense committees at least 90 days before taking any action associated with the closure of the Department of Defense detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the subsequent transfer of any persons detained at that facility to a new detention facility in the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Study- The notification under subsection (a) shall include the submission to the congressional defense committees of a study of the feasibility of closing the Department of Defense detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The study shall address the legal ramifications and the security, infrastructure, and other support requirements associated with closing the detention facility and transferring persons to a new detention facility in the United States, including an assessment of the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) The available space at a new detention facility.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) The ability to separate persons transferred to a new detention facility from any other individuals already detained at such facility.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) The number of security guards and support personnel required to undertake the detention of persons transferred to a new detention facility and a description of the barracks and other facilities necessary for such security guards and support personnel.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) The nature and cost of any security enhancements to an existing military installation that might be chosen to host a new detention facility.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) A comparison of the costs described in paragraph (4) with the estimated costs of constructing a new detention facility that is physically separate from any existing military installation or civilian prison.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) The advisability of expending the funds described in paragraphs (4) and (5) in light of the prior obligation and expenditure of amounts for the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(7) The proximity of a new detention facility to--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) private land;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) civilian populations; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) other military activities (if a new detention facility is or would be located on or near an existing military installation).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(8) The degree to which a new detention facility must be self-contained, including the existence of--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) on-site medical facilities available 24 hours per day;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) dedicated fire fighting capabilities;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) space for legal proceedings; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) recreational facilities comparable to those available at the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(9) The advisability of performing interrogations of persons transferred to the new detention facility.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(10) The potential that persons transferred to the new detention facility may be detained indefinitely.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(11) The impact that a new detention facility, if established on an existing military installation, would have on ongoing military activities at such installation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(12) The suitability for purposes of handling detainees of any military installation or other facility owned by the United States that has been closed or is scheduled to be closed under the defense base closure and realignment process.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(13) The possibility of transferring detainees to United States military installations located outside the United States or to the custody of foreign governments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Relocation Plan- The notification required under subsection (a) shall include a plan to relocate the persons detained at the detention facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, that is fully consistent with the results of the study conducted pursuant to subsection (b).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Congressional Defense Committees Defined- In this section, the term ‘congressional defense committees’ means--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
OC Blog Articles Related To This Bill
- Senate Passes Indefinite Military Detention Bill Over Obama Veto Threat Dec 03, 2011
- Is This Bill Discriminatory? Sep 21, 2011
- PATRIOT Act Extension Get Bipartisan Love in Senate May 24, 2011
- PATRIOT Act Extension Bill Would Also Expand Death Penalty Laws Mar 21, 2011
- Democrats and Republicans alike rush to extend the PATRIOT Act Jan 31, 2011
Recent OC Blog Articles
- Yes, let's stride towards an open VCS for legislation (or, GitHub for laws on OC) May 23, 2012
- Contact Congress Today to #FreeTHOMAS May 17, 2012
- Yochai Benkler: Blueprint for Democratic Participation May 10, 2012
- New NDAA Would Give the Military Clandestine Cyberwar Powers May 08, 2012
- The Week Ahead in Congress May 07, 2012

U.S. Congress - Text of H.R.1069 as Introduced in House Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility Safe Closure Act of 2009



