The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowH.R.233 - Railroad Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2009
To amend the Federal antitrust laws to provide expanded coverage and to eliminate exemptions from such laws that are contrary to the public interest with respect to railroads.
| Version | Word Count | Changes From Previous Version | Percent Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced in House | 1,334 | n/a | n/a |
| Reported in House | 1,607 | 59 Show Changes Hide Changes | 59% |
Key: changed or removed text inserted or modified text

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HR 233 IH 111th CONGRESS
Union Calendar No. 399CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
111th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
2d SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
H. R. 233CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
[Report No. 111-669, Part I]CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To amend the Federal antitrust laws to provide expanded coverage and to eliminate exemptions from such laws that are contrary to the public interest with respect to railroads.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
January 7, 2009CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
January 7, 2009CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Ms. BALDWIN (for herself, Mr. POMEROY, Mr. ALEXANDER, and Mr. WALZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concernedCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
November 30, 2010CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
November 30, 2010CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Reported from the Committee on the Judiciary with an amendmentCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
November 30, 2010CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
November 30, 2010CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Additional sponsors: Ms. HERSETH SANDLIN, Mr. KIND, Mr. BERRY, Ms. JACKSON LEE of Texas, Mr. ROSS, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. SNYDER, Mr. PERLMUTTER, Mr. PETERSON, Mr. DOGGETT, Ms. GIFFORDS, Mr. KAGEN, Mr. MELANCON, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. BEAN, Mr. BOUSTANY, and Ms. MOORE of WisconsinCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
November 30, 2010CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
November 30, 2010CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure discharged; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printedCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on January 7, 2009]CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on January 7, 2009]CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To amend the Federal antitrust laws to provide expanded coverage and to eliminate exemptions from such laws that are contrary to the public interest with respect to railroads.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘Railroad Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2009’. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF THE ANTITRUST LAWS TO RAIL COMMON CARRIERS.
(a) Application of the Antitrust Laws- The antitrust laws shall apply to a common carrier by railroad that is subject to the jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board under subtitle IV of title 49, United States Code, without regard to whether such common carrier filed a rate or whether a complaint challenging a rate is filed. (b) Definition- The term ‘antitrust laws’ has the meaning given it in subsection (a) of the 1st section of the Clayton Act (
SEC. 4. ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY.(b) Vesting of Authority in Antitrust Agencies- Section 11(a) of the Clayton Act (
SEC. 5. INJUNCTIONS AGAINST RAILROAD COMMON CARRIERS.(c) Injunctions- The proviso in section 16 of the Clayton Act ( The Clayton Act (
(d) Federal Trade Commission Authority- Section 5(a)(2) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (
‘For purposes of this paragraph with respect to unfair methods of competition, the term ‘common carriers’ excludes a common carrier by railroad that is subject to jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board under subtitle IVrail carrier as defined in section 10102 of title 49 of the United States Code.’. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 83. TERMINATION OF ANTITRUST EXEMPTIONS IN TITLE 49.
(a) In General-
(1) in subsection (a)-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) beginning in the 3d sentence of paragraph (2)(A) by striking ‘, and the Sherman Act (
(B) in paragraph (3)(B)-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) by striking ‘(i)’, and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) by striking clause (ii), CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) in paragraph (4)-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) by striking the 2d sentence, and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) in the 3d sentence by striking ‘However, the’ and inserting ‘The’, and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(CD) in paragraph (5)(A) by striking ‘, and the antitrust laws set forth in paragraph (2) of this subsection do not apply to parties and other persons with respect to making or carrying out the agreement’, CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in subsection (d) by striking the last sentence, and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) by striking subsection (e) and inserting the following: CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(e) Nothing in this section exempts a proposedn agreement described inapproved, or submitted for approval, under subsection (a) from the application of the antitrust laws (as defined in subsection (a) of the 1st section of the Clayton Act, but including section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to the extent such section 5 applies to unfair methods of competition). CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(f) In reviewing any proposed agreement described insubmitted for approval under subsection (a), the Board shall take into account, among any other considerations, the impact of the proposedsuch agreement on shippers, consumers, and affected communities. The Board shall make findings regarding such impact, which shall be-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) made part of the administrative record; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) submitted to any other reviewing agency for consideration in making its determination; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(3) available in any judicial review of the Board’s decision regarding such agreement.’. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Combinations-
(1) in subsection (a)-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) by striking ‘The authority’ and inserting ‘Except as provided in sections 4, 4A, 4C, 15, and 16 of the Clayton Act, the authority’;Subject to subsection (c), the authority’, and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) in the 3d sentence by striking ‘is exempt from the antitrust laws and from all other law,’ and inserting ‘is exempt from all other law (except the laws referred to in subsection (c)),’, and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) by adding at the end the following: CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(c) Nothing in this subchapter exempts a transaction described in subsection (a) from the application of the antitrust laws (as defined in subsection (a) of the 1st section of the Clayton Act, but including section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to the extent such section 5 applies to unfair methods of competition). The preceding sentence shall not apply to any transaction relating to the pooling of railroad cars approved by the Surface Transportation Board or its predecessor agency pursuant to section 11322. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(d) In reviewing any transaction described in subsection (a), the Board shall take into account, among any other considerations, the impact of the transaction on shippers and affected communities.’. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Conforming Amendments- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) HEADING- The heading for
(2) ANALYSIS OF SECTIONS- The analysis of sections of chapter 107 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 10706 and insert the following: CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘10706. Rate agreements.’. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 94. CLARIFICATIONS REGARDING APPLICABILITY OF REGULATORY DOCTRINES.
(a) Filed Rate Doctrine- The antitrust laws shall apply to a rail carrier (as defined in section 10102 of title 49 of the United States Code), without regard to whether such rail carrier filed a rate or whether a complaint challenging a rate is filed. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction- In any civil action under the antitrust laws against a rail carrier (as defined in section 10102 of title 49 of the United States Code), the district court shall retain the discretion to defer to the jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Definition- For purposes of subsections (a) and (b), the term ‘antitrust laws’ has the meaning given it in subsection (a) of the 1st section of the Clayton Act (
SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) In General- Except as provided in subsection (bs (b) and (c), this Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Limitation- ANo civil action under section 4, 4A, 4C, 15, or 16 of the Clayton Act, or a complaint under section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (
(1) occursconcluded or terminated before the expiration of the 180-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act;, and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) was exempted from the antitrust laws (as definedby statute from the antitrust laws as the result of an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission or the Surface Transportation Board issued before the date of the enactment of this Act. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Exclusion- No civil action under the antitrust laws may be filed for the purpose of dissolving or otherwise undoing any merger, acquisition, or transfer of control consummated before the date of the enactment of this Act that was exempted by statute from the antitrust laws as the result of an order described in subsection (b)(2). CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Definition- For purposes of subsections (b) and (c), the term ‘antitrust laws’ has the meaning given it in subsection (a) of the 1st section of the Clayton Act (
Union Calendar No. 399CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
111th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
2d SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
H. R. 233CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
[Report No. 111-669, Part I]CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To amend the Federal antitrust laws to provide expanded coverage and to eliminate exemptions from such laws that are contrary to the public interest with respect to railroads.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
November 30, 2010CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
November 30, 2010CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure discharged; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printedCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
Top-Rated Comments
- “I hear time and time again "Railroads need to be treated like any other ...” mlyon
- “Please don't the special interest destroy America's Rail.” Dawn12
Recent OC Blog Articles
- Yes, let's stride towards an open VCS for legislation (or, GitHub for laws on OC) May 23, 2012
- Contact Congress Today to #FreeTHOMAS May 17, 2012
- Yochai Benkler: Blueprint for Democratic Participation May 10, 2012
- New NDAA Would Give the Military Clandestine Cyberwar Powers May 08, 2012
- The Week Ahead in Congress May 07, 2012

U.S. Congress - Text of H.R.233 as Reported in House Railroad Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2009



