H.R.305 - Horse Transportation Safety Act of 2009

To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit the transportation of horses in interstate transportation in a motor vehicle containing 2 or more levels stacked on top of one another. view all titles (4)

All Bill Titles

  • Short: Horse Transportation Safety Act of 2009 as reported to house.
  • Official: To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit the transportation of horses in interstate transportation in a motor vehicle containing 2 or more levels stacked on top of one another. as introduced.
  • Popular: Horse Transportation Safety Act of 2009 as introduced.
  • Short: Horse Transportation Safety Act of 2009 as introduced.

This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.

Comments Feed

  • Skinny 01/17/2009 8:25am

    How many more deaths, catastrophic injuries, and unjustified suffering will occur because of human greed? It is inhumane to put a horse in a trailer where the height is shorter than they are at only 5 ft 7 inches high, preventing it from standing upright in a normal posture or from being able to control its position as the truck changes speed or turns. End the greed and provide humane transport for horses.
    This is what the trip is like:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEFJTUYOgOw&feature=related

  • Filtered Comment [ show ]

  • Comm_reply
    Seabiscute 01/18/2009 12:28pm

    Double-deckers full of horses are unsafe, period. Their center of gravity is too high. There have been a number of accidents with these. Of course there are going to be more accidents with single-deckers, there are many many more of them.

    We are supposed to be based on freedom, not on cruelty, by the way. It is cruel to haul horses in a double-decker. And BTW horses are not necessarily classified as livestock. Do you see horsemeat in your local supermarket?

  • tuff_stuff 01/17/2009 5:49pm
    Link Reply
    + -3

    FYI: I haul on a regular basis, a 19H Belgian Draft Stallion in a trailer that is regulated at 6.5 feet in height. How high do you suppose he gets his head? He is fine as a frog hair and has never shown the first sign of discomfort on any of his hundreds of haulings! A horse balances his/her self with their head,, rarely do I see them with heads in the air to accomodate for balance. They usually are looking toward where the footing is. Ride one up or down hill and tell me what you experience. I ride 7 hrs daily nearly 8 months of the year and this has always been my experiance. JMO

  • Comm_reply
    Seabiscute 01/18/2009 12:31pm

    So you are hauling a single-decker trailer? Much safer, wherever your stallion chooses to hold his head. And 6.5 (whether you mean 6’5" or 6 1/2 feet) is a lot taller than 5’7".

    Your stallion could not even fit in a double-decker, could he?

  • ckw7171 01/18/2009 4:28pm
    Link Reply
    + -2

    To Seabiscute
    Double-deckers full of horses are no more unsafe than doubledeckers of cattle/mules/ or larger animals. They are top heavy no matter what. As for horses. They are livestock. They were not raised as pets 100yrs ago. They were raised to do a job. Many people may treat them as pets and that is fine, thats on them and I wish I did see horsemeat at the local supermarket. It would solve the problem of shipping meat overseas, high horse populatios, suffering and unwanted animals.) It would hopefully make meat more affordable for the average joe. I would eat it if it were an option. It is hard enough to afford groceries every week with the increase in prices and the loss of jobs.
    I love horses but know their, place. Just like my dogs and cats. They have their own purposes too.

  • arabrescuelady 01/18/2009 6:17pm

    For those who seem to think that double deckers are fine for horses to travel hundreds of miles in, without food or water, in cramped conditions that force them to be in unnatural positions.
    I think the next time ya all take a road trip it should be in the trunk of a VW with 5 or 6 friends, likely by the time you get to Mexico from say, New York, you will think it is inhumane.
    Accidents from these trucks hauling horses (which they were not designed to do) have caused many deaths, human as well as equine. The injuries these horses suffer are horrific, all of this is documented, look it up!
    This is America, here, in this country, we do not eat horses, dogs, cats and a variety of other animals. It is 2009 currently, not 100 years ago.
    How can anyone think hauling one horse alone in a trailer, compares in any way to 40 being hauled together in something designed for short necked animals?
    ckw7171, you spoke of a high population problem. One of my concerns as well, perhaps you should contact AQHA and ask them with the current problem, how many foals they are expecting in the spring. I do want to mention though, it would be beneficial to all to stick to the topic here which is… the use of double decker trucks for hauling horses.
    This is not the thread to debate slaughter, what happened 100 years ago, the economy crisis or whether or not you want to eat your dog.

  • miss_nay 01/21/2009 5:51am
    Link Reply
    + -1

    live·stock (lvstk)
    n.
    Domestic animals, such as cattle or horses, raised for home use or for profit, especially on a farm.

    The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2003. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company.
    Does this mean anything to anyone? Get it out of your thick skulls that horses are house pets. God this irritates me to no end. If you don’t want your livestock slaughtered and eaten,, fine but we don’t try to jeopardize your income making potentials, STOP trying to dictate what we can and con not do with regard to ours. Yes it is 2009 and webster’s still has not changed the definition of LIVESTOCK since its inception to the dictionary.

  • miss_nay 01/21/2009 5:54am
    Link Reply
    + -1

    smart enough to pay thousands for yes votes from the house and senate to get what they want, but too dumb to google the word LIVESTOCK,,,, AMAZING!

  • robinbobin 03/17/2009 3:49pm

    Why haven’t we passed this bill already? Please call your congress person and ask them to co-sponsor it.

  • nodakrider 04/18/2009 7:16pm

    Has this country gone crazy, what next, mandatory seat belts for dog and cats? Maybe we could force the auto industry (since they are doing so good) to put dog and cat seat belt in vehicles! And then we could force the horse trailer industry to put air bags in horse trailers. And we could force all horse owners to carry a million dollars worth of health insurance on thier horses. That way we could get rid of the 140 billion dollar horse industry totally and you idiots would finally be happy. We should not have to call our congressmen because if they were able to produce a thought, they would have to see how stupid this is.

  • leenagrace 07/20/2009 8:49pm

    Horses are not cows, they are MUCH taller. A cow is 4 1/2 to 5 feet tall at the head. A horse is 6 – 7 feet tall at the head – a significant difference. Therefore they require a taller trailer so they can hold their heads naturally and balance to the movement. This is only being humane.

    For those that do not understand: how would you like to be 7 feet tall and be forced to ride for 12 or more hours in the backseat of an Audi 180 coupe or other miniature sports car?

    And for those who’d like to forget about this “insignificant” legislation:

    “Compassion for animals is intimately connected with goodness of character; and it may be confidently asserted that he who is cruel to animals cannot be a good man.”
    —Arthur Schopenhauer (philosopher)

    We are the sum of our humanity, we can choose to be humane.. or not. But it is a CHOICE and we shall reap what we sow.


Vote on This Bill

72% Users Support Bill

28 in favor / 11 opposed
 

Send Your Rep a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC
Save to Notebook Make A Bill Widget

Top-Rated Comments

OpenCongress is a free and open-source project of the Participatory Politics Foundation, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization with a mission to increase civic engagement. The non-profit Sunlight Foundation is the Founding and Primary Supporter of OpenCongress.