U.S. Congress - H.R.3113 Upper Elk River Wild and Scenic Study Act
H.R.3113 - Upper Elk River Wild and Scenic Study Act
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of the Elk River in the State of West Virginia for study for potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes. view all titles (5)
All Bill Titles
- Official: To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of the Elk River in the State of West Virginia for study for potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes. as introduced.
- Short: Upper Elk River Wild and Scenic Study Act as introduced.
- Short: Upper Elk River Wild and Scenic Study Act as reported to house.
- Short: Upper Elk River Wild and Scenic Study Act as passed house.
- Short: Upper Elk River Wild and Scenic Study Act as reported to senate.
This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.
Bill's Views
- Today: 3
- Past Seven Days: 7
- All-Time: 1,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Official Summary
3/2/2010--Reported to Senate without amendment. (This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The expanded summary of the House passed version is repeated here.) Upper Elk River Wild and Scenic Study Act - Amends the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a specified segmentOfficial Summary
3/2/2010--Reported to Senate without amendment. (This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The expanded summary of the House passed version is repeated here.) Upper Elk River Wild and Scenic Study Act - Amends the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a specified segment of the Elk River in West Virginia from the confluence of the Old Field Fork and the Big Spring Fork in Pocahontas County to the Pocahontas and Randolph County line for study as a potential addition to the Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Directs the Secretary of Agriculture to complete the study of such segment within a specified time period and report results to Congress. Requires the report to include an analysis of the potential impact of the designation on private lands within a five-mile segment of the Elk River or abutting that area. Specifies this Act's effect on:(1) access for recreational activities, including hunting, fishing, and trapping; and
(2) state authority to regulate fish and wildlife under state law or regulations.
...Read the Rest
Recent News Coverage
House Meets At... 12:30 pm: Morning Hour
Delahunt - Natural Resources) HR 3113 - Upper Elk River Wild and Scenic Study Act (Rep. Rahall - Natural Resources) HR 2265 - Magna Water District Water ...
Recent Blog Coverage
View All (94)
|
View Top Rated
SPAM Laws of
Last year we about got a SPAM law on the books if House administrators accustomed tbeneficiary adaptation of the SPAM bill, HR 3113,the “The Unsoacceptableed Commercial Electronic Mail Act of 2000″,with a vote of 427-1. ...
(Zrii) is it Worth It?? Scam? how many people like Zrii?
1618″ or “HR 3113.” These were bills in the US Congress that failed to become law. They have no legal effect. Pyramid schemes have long been illegal when conducted by mail in the United States or Canada. The same laws apply to Internet ...
(DETAIL QUESTIONS) $6 paypal « as seen on oprah » Is it ok if I do ...
1618″ or « HR 3113. » These were bills in the US Congress that failed to become law. They have no legal effect. Pyramid schemes have long been illegal when conducted by mail in the United States or Canada. ...
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
