H.R.35 - Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2009
To amend chapter 22 of title 44, United States Code, popularly known as the Presidential Records Act, to establish procedures for the consideration of claims of constitutionally based privilege against disclosure of Presidential records. view all titles (4)
All Bill Titles
- Short: Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2009 as passed house.
- Official: To amend chapter 22 of title 44, United States Code, popularly known as the Presidential Records Act, to establish procedures for the consideration of claims of constitutionally based privilege against disclosure of Presidential records. as introduced.
- Short: Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2009 as introduced.
- Short: Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2009 as reported to senate.

U.S. Congress - H.R.35 Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2009




Sort By
Comments Feed
Extends transparency
This bill is a great step to open up the government to the people. I quite frankly fail to understand how 58 representatives voted against it. The only conclusion I can come to is that they like secrecy surrounding the presidency. If any one can come up with reasoning to be against this bill, please tell me.
It’s time to foreclose, pay the “piper” and start over, and be accountable for our poor stewartship. Maybe we can clean it up before our children are left holding the bag.
The other matter: Read information I found on the below websites. Is thias true? If it is how can we trust Mr. Obama and you guys(SCOTUS, House, Senate, FBI,CIA, etc) with something as massive as this when you and he can’t cleanup simple matters from like simply providing a righteous response for a simple request to confirm Mr. Obama’s natural born US citizenship status. Ratherthan simply put this to rest by sending the information requested, I understand Mr. Obama and others named in lawsuits around the country have hired several powerful law firms requesting dismissal and to seal access to all of Mr. Obama’s records(vault copy of BC, college records, immigration records, medical records, ect.). I bet that costs lots money. Why not spend a few bucks and just provide the information? Would that clear the matter up amnd build trust in everyone.
Before you say it, let me ask: Since when was “FactCheck.org.” Appointed offical vetting agency for the election process?
In Texas, I understand the plaintiff’s request for dismissal used was that they have “Official Immunity.”
This gives me great faith and trust in my President & everyone that did not demand his accountability!
I understand Pelosi, Howard Dean and the DNC are responsible to make sure these matters are properly perfomed? HAs anyone asked them? I also understand a Phil Berg of the Democratic Party advised Mr. Obaqma he was not elligible way back when he first considered entering the race? Then why are there still lawsuits and hush by the Mainstream media? And the Subpoena from Occidental(see below)?
Mr. Obama can very simply put this to rest as he did the concerns of Rev. Wright. He didn’t get attorny’s to resolve that matters? Is he hiding something?
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/
A new lawsuit is being prepared by a California attorney who already has four cases pending over the issue of President Barack Obama’s eligibility to occupy to Oval Office, and this one will include a demand from state lawmakers who forward state funds to Washington for documentation of his qualifications.
Orly Taitz told WND today that she’s preparing the complaint but is holding onto it and will file it shortly to give state legislators a chance to join the action as plaintiffs.
Four already have signed up, including state Rep. Eric Swafford of Tennessee, who agreed to be a plaintiff “for a Writ of Mandamus to obtain original birth certificate, immigration records, passports and other vital records for Barry Soetero aka Barack Hussein Obama.”
Taitz told WND the case also probably will include members of the military as plaintiffs, since both state lawmakers and military officers are obliged to follow orders from the president of the United States and both have a need to know those orders are legitimate.
“In the military, those would be unlawful orders, and [following them] would subject the officers to courts-martial,” she said. “In the legislatures, they cannot follow any of his bills or orders … they don’t know who he is.
“As far as we know he is a foreign national … Why should state legislators send any funds from the state to a foreign national?” she said.
“While we are working on the complaint, I’m gathering support from different states,” she said.
Other sites with information:
http://www.colony14.net/id41.html
http://drorly.blogspot.com/2009/01/senator-alexanders-office-has-forwarded.html
www.obamacrimes.com
www.wethepeoplefoundation.org
http://www.yourfellowcitizen.com/
http://www.theobamafile.com/
http://www.actforamerica.com/
http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/g3.xml
http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualifications/1244/
The current puppet is not even legit. I only care about the records of semi-legitimate puppets.
Another law that will be ignored by any president regardless of party? This needs more teeth for honest transparency of government!