H.R.3590 - Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the first-time homebuyers credit in the case of members of the Armed Forces and certain other Federal employees, and for other purposes. view all titles (45)

All Bill Titles

  • Official: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the first-time homebuyers credit in the case of members of the Armed Forces and certain other Federal employees, and for other purposes. as introduced.
  • Short: Service Members Home Ownership Tax Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Short: Service Members Home Ownership Tax Act of 2009 as introduced.
  • Popular: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as introduced.
  • Popular: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Legislative Vehicle) as introduced.
  • Short: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as passed senate.
  • Official: An act entitled The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. as amended by senate.
  • Short: Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 as passed senate.
  • Short: Catalyst to Better Diabetes Care Act of 2009 as passed senate.
  • Short: CLASS Act as passed senate.
  • Short: Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act as passed senate.
  • Short: Congenital Heart Futures Act as passed senate.
  • Short: Cures Acceleration Network Act of 2009 as passed senate.
  • Short: EARLY Act as passed senate.
  • Short: Elder Justice Act of 2009 as passed senate.
  • Short: ENHANCED Act of 2009 as passed senate.
  • Short: Establishing a Network of Health-Advancing National Centers of Excellence for Depression Act of 2009 as passed senate.
  • Short: Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009 as passed senate.
  • Official: An act entitled The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. as introduced.
  • Popular: Health care reform bill.
  • Popular: Patient protection and affordable care bill.
  • Short: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as passed house.
  • Short: Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Short: Catalyst to Better Diabetes Care Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Short: CLASS Act as passed house.
  • Short: Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act as passed house.
  • Short: Congenital Heart Futures Act as passed house.
  • Short: Cures Acceleration Network Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Short: EARLY Act as passed house.
  • Short: Elder Justice Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Short: ENHANCED Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Short: Establishing a Network of Health-Advancing National Centers of Excellence for Depression Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Short: Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Short: Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009 as enacted.
  • Short: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as enacted.
  • Short: Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 as enacted.
  • Short: Catalyst to Better Diabetes Care Act of 2009 as enacted.
  • Short: CLASS Act as enacted.
  • Short: Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act as enacted.
  • Short: Congenital Heart Futures Act as enacted.
  • Short: Cures Acceleration Network Act of 2009 as enacted.
  • Short: EARLY Act as enacted.
  • Short: Elder Justice Act of 2009 as enacted.
  • Short: ENHANCED Act of 2009 as enacted.
  • Short: Establishing a Network of Health-Advancing National Centers of Excellence for Depression Act of 2009 as enacted.

Comments Feed

Displaying 1-30 of 211 total comments.

  • Filtered Comment [ show ]

  • Moderated Comment

  • Filtered Comment [ show ]

  • Comm_reply
    bravo6lima 11/27/2009 1:33pm
    Link Reply
    + -1

    I would support this bill rather than hr3262.One thing,Why if I disagree with some one am I a Troll(being a conservative rather than a republican)?I remember a time when being labled as a liberal meant that you were open to new ideas and did not have tunnel vision.As time has passed,the roles seem to be changing,at least through my eyes.I could be wrong(as I frequently am).

  • Comm_reply
    LucasFoxx 11/29/2009 8:48am
    Link Reply
    + -1

    What makes this bill more palatable to you, bravo6lima?

  • Comm_reply
    justamick 12/08/2009 4:16am

    First of all Lucas, this is not a bill about health care, if you look at the title, you would see that it is a legislative vehicle. In other words, this is the bill that is going to carry the health care bill with it. This bill covers a first time home buyers credit for members of the armed forces.

    It has nothing to do with health care.

  • Comm_reply
    driskells 12/26/2009 12:08am

    I have had a problem with additional policies riding the coattail of other policies as long as I can remember. That process has been leveraged by democrats and republicans for years. In fact, the size of many of the policies has been abrused in similar fashion by both parties. I want to see solutions presented by both parties. Don’t base your argument on the size or the bill or how fast the bill is passed. BTW, I am an Independent.

  • Filtered Comment [ show ]

  • LeMat 11/29/2009 11:14am

    This bill is quite plainly unconstitutional. Given that they are sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution their authority becomes insolvent, and they are (already) guilty of not only perjury but also treason.

    If this bill is signed into law, I cannot wait to see how many courts tear it to shreds and how many States outright reject it. I am certain to be amused when they try to fine me for not carrying insurance. I’ll be doubly amused if they try to do something to enforce that fine.

    Idiots… for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Congress is going to reap the whirlwind on this bill.

  • Comm_reply

    Filtered Comment [ show ]

  • Comm_reply
    driskells 12/26/2009 12:11am
    Link Reply
    + -1

    What about the Social Security policy? It has been in place for decades and the courts have not torn it to pieces. I am not in full support of any bill passed by our legislation, but expect all parties to propose solutions to American problems.

  • Comm_reply

    Filtered Comment [ show ]

  • Comm_reply
    gfarq 03/22/2010 1:24am

    Did you even read the issue your commenting on or just listening to people who claim they read it?

  • Comm_reply

    Filtered Comment [ show ]

  • Comm_reply
    kvarnlov 03/28/2010 12:03pm

    This is a genuine question, so I hope you see it as this. I keep hearing people say that this bill is unconstitutional, however I do not plainly see the unconstitutionality of it. Can you please explain the details of the bill that make it unconstitutional? Thank you. I look forward to your answer.

  • Comm_reply
    JonasGreywolf 07/28/2010 12:25pm

    You say this is unconstitutional, but you do nothing to support your claim. Try using facts instead of slogans & jargons. It might help your case.

  • Filtered Comment [ show ]

  • Comm_reply

    Filtered Comment [ show ]

  • Moderated Comment

  • Comm_reply

    Filtered Comment [ show ]

  • b58 12/14/2009 3:56am
    Link Reply
    + -1

    This country has gone to a one man vote on everything in Washington. The reason I say that just look the people all over this country by the millions has already said they don’t want this healthcare that is being pushed through at break neck speed while the people says no. The people has had tea parties and town hall meetings and wrote and called Washington trying to stop it. But it appears that congress and senate is deaf to the very ones that voted them into their jobs. So it goes back to the idea that one senator is going to tell millions of people what they can have and not have no matter what the millions of people wants. What part of the word NO does the liberals not understand.

  • Comm_reply

    Filtered Comment [ show ]

  • Comm_reply
    justamick 12/16/2009 12:11pm

    PROVE that the people who are members of the Tea Party movement are a very small constituency.

    In the future, I would appreciate you referring to the people of this movement in a less offensive manner.

  • Comm_reply

    Filtered Comment [ show ]

  • Comm_reply
    justamick 12/19/2009 8:38pm

    So if someone has legitimate concerns fueled by he abuses of the Government in place that is supposed to protect them then they are offensive? You’re a real piece of work.

    Referring to them in a derogatory sexual manner is both unbecoming and offensive, no matter WHO you are!

  • Comm_reply

    Filtered Comment [ show ]

  • Comm_reply
    G1VROZ 03/18/2010 7:28am

    I disagree that "conservatives, by nature, are typically less vocal and “in-your-face” as a liberal". It is difficult to compare the extremes at either end of the scale because both can go completely overboard to the point of violence. So the question is either who goes to the extreme more often, or which are more “in-your-face” liberal moderates, or conservative moderates. I both cases, I think conservative are a little more in-your-face, but I concede that it is not by much.

  • Comm_reply
    geekmom 03/24/2010 12:17pm
    Link Reply
    + -1

    i’m in your face, but not violently. with that said, there are a lot of people who don’t know where they are and vote for the “other person” and now they’ve come to realize this is not a good thing to do. i know many republicans who still don’t have a clue as to what is going on and don’t even know about the 70 against 30 for split.

  • Comm_reply

    Filtered Comment [ show ]

  • Comm_reply
    suzieqs 03/01/2010 12:20am

    Have any of you noticed how top-rated comments and higher ratings tend to lean more towards the tea party – also spelled with lowercase to emphasize a point-they might represent a lower percentage driskells, but they thrive in numbers here, just look at the top-rated comments over on the right.


Vote on This Bill

29% Users Support Bill

1085 in favor / 2695 opposed
 

Send Your Rep a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC

Top-Rated Comments