H.R.3590 - Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the first-time homebuyers credit in the case of members of the Armed Forces and certain other Federal employees, and for other purposes. view all titles (45)

All Bill Titles

  • Official: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the first-time homebuyers credit in the case of members of the Armed Forces and certain other Federal employees, and for other purposes. as introduced.
  • Short: Service Members Home Ownership Tax Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Short: Service Members Home Ownership Tax Act of 2009 as introduced.
  • Popular: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as introduced.
  • Popular: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Legislative Vehicle) as introduced.
  • Short: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as passed senate.
  • Official: An act entitled The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. as amended by senate.
  • Short: Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 as passed senate.
  • Short: Catalyst to Better Diabetes Care Act of 2009 as passed senate.
  • Short: CLASS Act as passed senate.
  • Short: Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act as passed senate.
  • Short: Congenital Heart Futures Act as passed senate.
  • Short: Cures Acceleration Network Act of 2009 as passed senate.
  • Short: EARLY Act as passed senate.
  • Short: Elder Justice Act of 2009 as passed senate.
  • Short: ENHANCED Act of 2009 as passed senate.
  • Short: Establishing a Network of Health-Advancing National Centers of Excellence for Depression Act of 2009 as passed senate.
  • Short: Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009 as passed senate.
  • Official: An act entitled The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. as introduced.
  • Popular: Health care reform bill.
  • Popular: Patient protection and affordable care bill.
  • Short: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as passed house.
  • Short: Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Short: Catalyst to Better Diabetes Care Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Short: CLASS Act as passed house.
  • Short: Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act as passed house.
  • Short: Congenital Heart Futures Act as passed house.
  • Short: Cures Acceleration Network Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Short: EARLY Act as passed house.
  • Short: Elder Justice Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Short: ENHANCED Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Short: Establishing a Network of Health-Advancing National Centers of Excellence for Depression Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Short: Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Short: Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009 as enacted.
  • Short: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as enacted.
  • Short: Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 as enacted.
  • Short: Catalyst to Better Diabetes Care Act of 2009 as enacted.
  • Short: CLASS Act as enacted.
  • Short: Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act as enacted.
  • Short: Congenital Heart Futures Act as enacted.
  • Short: Cures Acceleration Network Act of 2009 as enacted.
  • Short: EARLY Act as enacted.
  • Short: Elder Justice Act of 2009 as enacted.
  • Short: ENHANCED Act of 2009 as enacted.
  • Short: Establishing a Network of Health-Advancing National Centers of Excellence for Depression Act of 2009 as enacted.

Comments Feed

Displaying 181-210 of 211 total comments.

Filtered Comment [ show ]

applemanmatt 12/24/2009 6:24pm

The problem with this so called public option is that it is not legit competition and that it will bankrupt the private health insurance industry, which is by definition called a single payer system. The best way to insure 48 million Americans and bring down costs is to allow employers to buy private insurance from other states. That is the best way to reform our health care system.

pirateu 12/24/2009 10:01am
in reply to LucasFoxx Dec 21, 2009 12:49pm

You people amaze me they had thousands of signs and they showed three or four of them that were out of line.This coming from the people that dogged Bush every hour of the day.

grant3719 12/24/2009 7:25am

We must remember that one person’s “rights” stop where another person’s begin.
This bill assumes that all people want insurance. I personally don’t want nor can I afford insurance. I want affordable “Health Care”. You are free to say what you want about me; I have heard it all before. However, it is my “right” not to patron any business I chose. Including Insurance companies.
This whole bill has been about Insurance and never about the cost/PRICE of “Health Care”. Overall, the profit margin for health insurance companies was a modest 3.4 percent over the past year, according to data provided by Morningstar. That ranks 87th out of 215 industries and slightly above the median of 2.2 percent.
Pharmaceutical companies have a profit margin of 16.4 percent—seventh highest of the 215 industries that Morningstar tracks.

http://www.usnews.com/money/blogs/flowchart/2009/08/25/why-health-insurers-make-lousy-villains.html

Filtered Comment [ show ]

Filtered Comment [ show ]

jnjnelson 12/22/2009 10:13am

The proper role of government is to protect the innocent from tyranny. The proper role of national government is limited and clearly defined in our Constitution, and this bill clearly falls outside the proper role of our national government.

Should everyone have access to health care? Yes, definitely. Should anyone be forced to provide that health care? Absolutely not. When any person is forced to provide health care, government is not only over-stepping its authority, it is practicing tyranny. Governmental force is supposed to protect individuals from tyranny, not practice it. This bill is criminal – and those who vote for it are committing crimes against freedom. The Declaration of Independence outlines the proper way to respond to tyrants.

LucasFoxx 12/21/2009 12:49pm

So far, I’m enjoying the “screwing” I’m getting from this administration. It’s reassuring to know the Presidency is in competent hands again.

There have been many Tea Party movements in the past. This one seems to be an artificial movement spin-off of the Ron Paul movement; spun off, funded, and promoted by well known GOP assets: Americans for Prosperity, Freedom Works, and Fox News. I don’t remember them supporting any of the congressional victors in the 2006 change of leadership nor Obama’s election.

“Hate-mongering and smearing all over the TV shows” are words that come to mind when shown “Muslim President” and “Death Panel” signs and correlations between Health Care Reform and the Holocaust. If they are really serious about “REAL change”, they should be less extreme and more responsible in their rationale and rhetoric. Rants of ObamaCare, Communism and Socialism deafen ears; much like the boy who cried wolf.

BelovedEmpress 12/21/2009 9:59am

Lets not forget the worst part of this deal – its not just that taxpayers will foot the bill for non taxpayers so they can have ‘free’ care … the worst part is that buying insurance will be mandatory and will be a part of your IRS tax return – show proof of coverage or be fined. Sorry folks but that is extortion!! There are always better ways to do things but the govt wants to control and make deals.

Cap lawsuits, make ins companies portable (increases competition) pay doctors what they are worth – leave medicare for the seniors – stop the handouts – teach people how to live healthier – add to those being able to get our meds from outside the US – the FDA is just another control.

People get so uppity about their right to health care – what about my right to not have to pay for your ‘free’ care??

The govt is funded by tax dollars – so every time you get something from them – you are really getting it from those who pay taxes. will you pay my fine please??

Slugger 12/21/2009 5:45am
in reply to Constitutionist Dec 20, 2009 10:16pm
Today and over a hundred years ago bribery was known and still is known as the same thing. The basic meaning of bribery can be described as a way to get someone to do something, for something in exchange.

People in power try to bribe other people in power for even greater power or things of greater monetary value. Of course the authors of the Constitution knew bribes were tempting and made a law that prevented any government official from accepting a bribe, especially from a foreign nation, without being kicked out of office.
Votes were bought, like I will see to it that your State gets 300 Hundred Million Dollars.

Filtered Comment [ show ]

Constitutionist 12/20/2009 10:16pm

I can’t believe this GARBAGE legislation is making its way through congress when so many Americans are against it? Who are these senator’s, who are supposed to be representing American interest, listening to if not us? These kinds of politics make me SICK!! Our politicians have been bought off, obviously!!… but I suppose that’s old news. When will America be America again?

Furthermore, it disgusts me how they disguise these garbage bills with fancy titles and abstracts that SOUND good, but are filled with poison. Of course another strategy of theirs is loading these bills with thousands of pages of garbage so nobody will ever read it, even if they had the time to. Finally, they push them through, making the bills impossible to come under scrutiny. What the crap is WRONG with this country and its politics!?! This is INSANITY people!!

RESTORE THE REPUBLIC!!

eohusby 12/20/2009 2:08pm

The Democratic “health care reform” effort has become an election campaign. They just want something, anything, to pass. They don’t even care that the Senate bill will not reduce health care costs, will not reduce health insurance costs, will raise taxes on the middle class, will severely hurt small businesses, will increase the deficit, and otherwise will not achieve any of the goals that President Obama set for health care reform.

The process is not transparent, as was promised. This is a behind closed doors process full of payoffs and kickbacks. If this thing passes, it will be a sad day for our country.

Keep up the fight!

justamick 12/19/2009 8:38pm
in reply to LucasFoxx Dec 18, 2009 8:43am

So if someone has legitimate concerns fueled by he abuses of the Government in place that is supposed to protect them then they are offensive? You’re a real piece of work.

Referring to them in a derogatory sexual manner is both unbecoming and offensive, no matter WHO you are!

Filtered Comment [ show ]

justamick 12/16/2009 12:11pm
in reply to LucasFoxx Dec 15, 2009 6:12am

PROVE that the people who are members of the Tea Party movement are a very small constituency.

In the future, I would appreciate you referring to the people of this movement in a less offensive manner.

Filtered Comment [ show ]

b58 12/14/2009 3:56am
Link Reply
+ -1

This country has gone to a one man vote on everything in Washington. The reason I say that just look the people all over this country by the millions has already said they don’t want this healthcare that is being pushed through at break neck speed while the people says no. The people has had tea parties and town hall meetings and wrote and called Washington trying to stop it. But it appears that congress and senate is deaf to the very ones that voted them into their jobs. So it goes back to the idea that one senator is going to tell millions of people what they can have and not have no matter what the millions of people wants. What part of the word NO does the liberals not understand.

Filtered Comment [ show ]

Moderated Comment

Filtered Comment [ show ]

Filtered Comment [ show ]

Filtered Comment [ show ]

Moderated Comment

justamick 12/08/2009 4:16am
in reply to LucasFoxx Nov 29, 2009 8:48am

First of all Lucas, this is not a bill about health care, if you look at the title, you would see that it is a legislative vehicle. In other words, this is the bill that is going to carry the health care bill with it. This bill covers a first time home buyers credit for members of the armed forces.

It has nothing to do with health care.

LeMat 11/29/2009 11:14am

This bill is quite plainly unconstitutional. Given that they are sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution their authority becomes insolvent, and they are (already) guilty of not only perjury but also treason.

If this bill is signed into law, I cannot wait to see how many courts tear it to shreds and how many States outright reject it. I am certain to be amused when they try to fine me for not carrying insurance. I’ll be doubly amused if they try to do something to enforce that fine.

Idiots… for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Congress is going to reap the whirlwind on this bill.

LucasFoxx 11/29/2009 8:48am
Link Reply
+ -1
in reply to bravo6lima Nov 27, 2009 1:33pm

What makes this bill more palatable to you, bravo6lima?

bravo6lima 11/27/2009 1:33pm
Link Reply
+ -1
in reply to LucasFoxx Nov 24, 2009 3:32pm

I would support this bill rather than hr3262.One thing,Why if I disagree with some one am I a Troll(being a conservative rather than a republican)?I remember a time when being labled as a liberal meant that you were open to new ideas and did not have tunnel vision.As time has passed,the roles seem to be changing,at least through my eyes.I could be wrong(as I frequently am).

Filtered Comment [ show ]

Filtered Comment [ show ]


Vote on This Bill

29% Users Support Bill

1083 in favor / 2691 opposed
 

Send Your Rep a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC
Save to Notebook Make A Bill Widget

Top-Rated Comments

OpenCongress is a free and open-source project of the Participatory Politics Foundation, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization with a mission to increase civic engagement. The non-profit Sunlight Foundation is the Founding and Primary Supporter of OpenCongress.