HR 3786 IHCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

To enhance reciprocal market access for United States domestic producers in the negotiating process of bilateral, regional, and multilateral trade agreements.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

October 8, 2009CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Ms. SLAUGHTER (for herself, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. HARE, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. JONES, Ms. KAPTUR, and Mr. TONKO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and MeansCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

To enhance reciprocal market access for United States domestic producers in the negotiating process of bilateral, regional, and multilateral trade agreements.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘Reciprocal Market Access Act of 2009’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

(a) Findings- Congress finds the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) One of the fundamental tenets of the World Trade Organization (WTO) is reciprocal market access. This principle is underscored in the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization which called for ‘entering into reciprocal and mutually advantageous arrangements directed to the substantial reduction of tariffs and other barriers to trade and to the elimination of discriminatory treatment in international trade relations’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) With each subsequent round of bilateral, regional, and multilateral trade negotiations, tariffs have been significantly reduced or eliminated for many manufactured goods, leaving nontariff barriers as the most pervasive, significant, and challenging barriers to United States exports and market opportunities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) The United States market is widely recognized as one of the most open markets in the world. Average United States tariff rates are very low and the United States has limited, if any, nontariff barriers.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(4) Often the only leverage the United States has to obtain the reduction or elimination of nontariff barriers imposed by foreign countries is to negotiate the amount of tariffs the United States imposes on imports from those foreign countries.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(5) Under the current negotiating process, negotiations to reduce or eliminate tariff barriers and nontariff barriers are separate and self-contained, meaning that tradeoffs are tariff-for-tariff and nontariff-for-nontariff. As a result, a tariff can be reduced or eliminated without securing elimination of the real barrier or barriers that deny United States businesses access to a foreign market.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Purpose- The purpose of this Act is to require that United States trade negotiations achieve measurable results for United States businesses by ensuring that trade agreements result in expanded market access for United States exports and not solely the elimination of tariffs on goods imported into the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE RATES OF DUTY PURSUANT TO CERTAIN TRADE AGREEMENTS.

(a) Limitation- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, on or after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President may not agree to a modification of an existing duty that would reduce or eliminate the bound or applied rate of such duty on any product in order to carry out a trade agreement entered into between the United States and a foreign country until the President transmits to Congress a certification described in subsection (b).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Certification- A certification referred to in subsection (a) is a certification by the President that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) the United States has obtained the reduction or elimination of tariff and nontariff barriers and policies and practices of the government of a foreign country described in subsection (a) with respect to United States exports of any product identified by United States domestic producers as having the same physical characteristics and uses as the product for which a modification of an existing duty is sought by the President as described in subsection (a); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) a violation of any provision of the trade agreement described in subsection (a) relating to the matters described in paragraph (1) is immediately enforceable in accordance with the provisions of section 4.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS.

(a) Withdrawal of Tariff Concessions- If the President does agree to a modification described in section 3(a), and the United States Trade Representative determines pursuant to subsection (c) that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) a tariff or nontariff barrier or policy or practice of the government of a foreign country described in section 3(a) has not been reduced or eliminated, orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) a tariff or nontariff barrier or policy or practice of such government has been imposed or discovered,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





the modification shall be withdrawn until such time as the United States Trade Representative submits to Congress a certification described in section 3(b)(1).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Investigation-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) IN GENERAL- The United States Trade Representative shall initiate an investigation if an interested party files a petition with the United States Trade Representative which alleges the elements necessary for the withdrawal of the modification of an existing duty under subsection (a), and which is accompanied by information reasonably available to the petitioner supporting such allegations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) INTERESTED PARTY DEFINED- For purposes of paragraph (1), the term ‘interested party’ means--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) a manufacturer, producer, or wholesaler in the United States of a domestic product that has the same physical characteristics and uses as the product for which a modification of an existing duty is sought;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) a certified union or recognized union or group of workers engaged in the manufacture, production, or wholesale in the United States of a domestic product that has the same physical characteristics and uses as the product for which a modification of an existing duty is sought;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(C) a trade or business association a majority of whose members manufacture, produce, or wholesale in the United States a domestic product that has the same physical characteristics and uses as the product for which a modification of an existing duty is sought; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(D) a member of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives or a member of the Committee on Finance of the Senate.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(c) Determination by USTR- Not later than 45 days after the date on which a petition is filed under subsection (b), the United States Trade Representative shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) determine whether the petition alleges the elements necessary for the withdrawal of the modification of an existing duty under subsection (a); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) notify the petitioner of the determination under paragraph (1) and the reasons for the determination.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink