U.S. Congress - Text of H.R.5136 as Placed on Calendar Senate National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowH.R.5136 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2011 for military activities of the Department of Defense, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.
| Version | Word Count | Changes From Previous Version | Percent Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced in House | 36,537 | n/a | n/a |
| Reported in House | 132,295 | 2,189 | 88% |
| Engrossed in House | 191,580 | 309 | 41% |
| Placed on Calendar Senate | 190,655 | 8 Show Changes Hide Changes | 0% |
Key: changed or removed text inserted or modified text
Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HR 5136 EHPCSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Calendar No. 423CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
111th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
2d SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
H. R. 5136CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
June 9, 2010CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
June 9, 2010CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Received; read twice and placed on the calendarCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
AN ACTCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2011 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 2. ORGANIZATION OF ACT INTO DIVISIONS; TABLE OF CONTENTS.
(a) Divisions- This Act is organized into four divisions as follows:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) Division A--Department of Defense Authorizations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) Division B--Military Construction Authorizations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) Division C--Department of Energy National Security Authorizations and Other Authorizations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) Division D--Implementing Management for Performance and Related Reforms to Obtain Value in Every Acquisition Act.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Table of Contents- The table of contents for this Act is as follows:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1. Short title.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 4. Treatment of successor contingency operation to Operation Iraqi Freedom.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS
TITLE I--PROCUREMENT
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 101. Army.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 102. Navy and Marine Corps.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 103. Air Force.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 104. Defense-wide activities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Army Programs
Sec. 111. Procurement of early infantry brigade combat team increment one equipment.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 112. Report on Army battlefield network plans and programs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 113. Limitation on use of funds for line-haul tractors.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Navy Programs
Sec. 121. Incremental funding for procurement of large naval vessels.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 122. Multiyear procurement of F/A-18E, F/A-18F, and EA-18G aircraft.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 123. Report on naval force structure and missile defense.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle D--Air Force Programs
Sec. 131. Preservation and storage of unique tooling for F-22 fighter aircraft.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle E--Joint and Multiservice Matters
Sec. 141. Limitation on procurement of F-35 Lightning II aircraft.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 142. Limitations on biometric systems funds.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 143. Counter-improvised explosive device initiatives database.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 144. Study on lightweight body armor solutions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE II--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations
Sec. 211. Report requirements for replacement program of the Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 212. Limitation on obligation of funds for F-35 Lightning II aircraft program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 213. Inclusion in annual budget request and future-years defense program of sufficient amounts for continued development and procurement of competitive propulsion system for F-35 Lightning II aircraft.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 214. Separate program elements required for research and development of Joint Light Tactical Vehicle.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Missile Defense Programs
Sec. 221. Limitation on availability of funds for missile defenses in Europe.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 222. Repeal of prohibition of certain contracts by Missile Defense Agency with foreign entities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 223. Phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 224. Homeland defense hedging policy.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 225. Independent assessment of the plan for defense of the homeland against the threat of ballistic missiles.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 226. Study on ballistic missile defense capabilities of the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 227. Reports on standard missile system.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle D--Reports
Sec. 231. Report on analysis of alternatives and program requirements for the Ground Combat Vehicle program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 232. Cost benefit analysis of future tank-fired munitions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 233. Annual comptroller general report on the VH-(XX) presidential helicopter acquisition program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 234. Joint assessment of the joint effects targeting system.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle E--Other Matters
Sec. 241. Escalation of force capabilities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 242. Pilot program to include technology protection features during research and development of defense systems.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 243. Pilot program on collaborative energy security.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 244. Report on regional advanced technology clusters.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 245. Sense of Congress affirming the importance of Department of Defense participation in development of next generation semiconductor technologies.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE III--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Energy and Environmental Provisions
Sec. 311. Reimbursement of Environmental Protection Agency for certain costs in connection with the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant, Minnesota.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 312. Payment to Environmental Protection Agency of stipulated penalties in connection with Naval Air Station, Brunswick, Maine.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 313. Testing and certification plan for operational use of an aviation biofuel derived from materials that do not compete with food stocks.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 314. Report identifying hybrid or electric propulsion systems and other fuel-saving technologies for incorporation into tactical motor vehicles.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 315. Exception to alternative fuel procurement requirement.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 316. Information sharing relating to investigation of exposure to drinking water contamination at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Workplace and Depot Issues
Sec. 321. Technical amendments to requirement for service contract inventory.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 322. Repeal of conditions on expansion of functions performed under prime vendor contracts for depot-level maintenance and repair.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 323. Pilot program on best value for contracts for private security functions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 324. Standards and certification for private security contractors.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 325. Prohibition on establishing goals or quotas for conversion of functions to performance by Department of Defense civilian employees.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 326. Treatment of employer contributions to health benefits and retirement plans for purposes of cost-comparisons of contractor and civilian employee performance of Department of Defense functions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle D--Reports
Sec. 331. Revision to reporting requirement relating to operation and financial support for military museums.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 332. Additional reporting requirements relating to corrosion prevention projects and activities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 333. Modification and repeal of certain reporting requirements.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 334. Report on Air Sovereignty Alert mission.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 335. Report on the SEAD/DEAD mission requirement for the Air Force.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 336. Requirement to update study on strategic seaports.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 337. Study and report on feasibility of joint usage of the NASA Shuttle Logistics Depot.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle E--Limitations and Extensions of Authority
Sec. 341. Permanent authority to accept and use landing fees charged for use of domestic military airfields by civil aircraft.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 342. Improvement and extension of Arsenal Support Program Initiative.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 343. Extension of authority to reimburse expenses for certain Navy mess operations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 344. Limitation on obligation of funds for the Army Human Terrain System.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 345. Limitation on obligation of funds pending submission of classified justification material.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 346. Limitation on retirement of C-130 aircraft from Air Force inventory.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 347. Commercial sale of small arms ammunition in excess of military requirements.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 348. Limitation on Air Force fiscal year 2011 force structure announcement implementation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle F--Other Matters
Sec. 351. Expedited processing of background investigations for certain individuals.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 352. Adoption of military working dogs by family members of deceased or seriously wounded members of the Armed Forces who were handlers of the dogs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 353. Revision to authorities relating to transportation of civilian passengers and commercial cargoes by Department of Defense when space unavailable on commercial lines.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 354. Technical correction to obsolete reference relating to use of flexible hiring authority to facilitate performance of certain Department of Defense functions by civilian employees.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 355. Inventory and study of budget modeling and simulation tools.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 356. Sense of Congress regarding continued importance of High-Altitude Aviation Training Site, Colorado.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 357. Department of Defense study on simulated tactical flight training in a sustained g environment.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 358. Study of effects of new construction of obstructions on military installations and operations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 359. Sense of Congress regarding fire-resistant utility ensembles for National Guard personnel in civil authority missions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 360. Authority to make excess nonlethal supplies available for domestic emergency assistance.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 361. Recovery of missing Department of Defense property.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 362. Authority for payment of full replacement value for loss or damage to household goods in limited cases not covered by carrier liability.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE IV--MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS
Subtitle A--Active Forces
Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 402. Revision in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Reserve Forces
Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the Reserves.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2011 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 421. Military personnel.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE V--MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY
Subtitle A--Officer Personnel Policy Generally
Sec. 501. Age for health care professional appointments and mandatory retirements.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 502. Authority for appointment of warrant officers in the grade of W-1 by commission and standardization of warrant officer appointing authority.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 503. Nondisclosure of information from discussions, deliberations, notes, and records of special selection boards.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 504. Administrative removal of officers from list of officers recommended for promotion.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 505. Eligibility of officers to serve on boards of inquiry for separation of regular officers for substandard performance and other reasons.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 506. Temporary authority to reduce minimum length of active service as a commissioned officer required for voluntary retirement as an officer.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Reserve Component Management
Sec. 511. Preseparation counseling for members of the reserve components.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 512. Military correction board remedies for National Guard members.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 513. Removal of statutory distribution limits on Navy reserve flag officer allocation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 514. Assignment of Air Force Reserve military technicians (dual status) to positions outside Air Force Reserve unit program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 515. Temporary authority for temporary employment of non-dual status military technicians.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 516. Revised structure and functions of Reserve Forces Policy Board.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 517. Merit Systems Protection Board and judicial remedies for National Guard technicians.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Joint Qualified Officers and Requirements
Sec. 521. Technical revisions to definition of joint matters for purposes of joint officer management.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 522. Changes to process involving promotion boards for joint qualified officers and officers with joint staff experience.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 523. Secure electronic delivery of Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle D--General Service Authorities
Sec. 531. Extension of temporary authority to order retired members of the Armed Forces to active duty in high-demand, low-density assignments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 532. Correction of military records.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 533. Modification of Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) to specifically identify a space for inclusion of e-mail address.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 534. Recognition of role of female members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense review of military occupational specialties available to female members.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 535. Matters covered by preseparation counseling for members of the Armed Forces and their spouses.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 536. Department of Defense policy concerning homosexuality in the Armed Forces.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle E--Military Justice and Legal Matters
Sec. 541. Continuation of warrant officers on active duty to complete disciplinary action.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 542. Enhanced authority to punish contempt in military justice proceedings.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 543. Limitations on use in personnel action of information contained in criminal investigative report or in index maintained for law enforcement retrieval and analysis.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 544. Protection of child custody arrangements for parents who are members of the Armed Forces deployed in support of a contingency operation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 545. Improvements to Department of Defense domestic violence programs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 546. Public release of restricted annex of Department of Defense Report of the Independent Review Related to Fort Hood pertaining to oversight of the alleged perpetrator of the attack.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle F--Member Education and Training Opportunities and Administration
Sec. 551. Repayment of education loan repayment benefits.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 552. Active duty obligation for graduates of the military service academies participating in the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship and Financial Assistance program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 553. Waiver of maximum age limitation on admission to service academies for certain enlisted members who served during Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 554. Report of feasibility and cost of expanding enrollment authority of Community College of the Air Force to include additional members of the Armed Forces.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle G--Defense Dependents’ Education
Sec. 561. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 562. Enrollment of dependents of members of the Armed Forces who reside in temporary housing in Department of Defense domestic dependent elementary and secondary schools.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle H--Decorations, Awards, and Commemorations
Sec. 571. Notification requirement for determination made in response to review of proposal for award of a Medal of Honor not previously submitted in timely fashion.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 572. Department of Defense recognition of spouses of members of the Armed Forces.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 573. Department of Defense recognition of children of members of the Armed Forces.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 574. Clarification of persons eligible for award of bronze star medal.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 575. Award of Vietnam Service Medal to veterans who participated in Mayaguez rescue operation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 576. Authorization for award of Medal of Honor to certain members of the Army for acts of valor during the Civil War, Korean War, or Vietnam War.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 577. Authorization and request for award of Distinguished-Service Cross to Jay C. Copley for acts of valor during the Vietnam War.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 578. Program to commemorate 60th anniversary of the Korean War.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 579. Establishment of Combat Medevac Badge.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 580. Retroactive award of Army Combat Action Badge.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 580A. Review regarding award of Medal of Honor to Jewish American World War I veterans.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle I--Military Family Readiness Matters
Sec. 581. Appointment of additional member of Department of Defense Military Family Readiness Council.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 582. Director of the Office of Community Support for Military Families With Special Needs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 583. Pilot program of personalized career development counseling for military spouses.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 584. Modification of Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 585. Importance of Office of Community Support for Military Families with Special Needs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 586. Comptroller General report on Department of Defense Office of Community Support for Military Families with Special Needs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 587. Comptroller General report on Exceptional Family Member Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 588. Comptroller General review of Department of Defense military spouse employment programs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 589. Report on Department of Defense military spouse education programs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 590. Annual leave for family of deployed members of the uniformed services.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 590A. Codification and continuation of Joint Family Support Assistance Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle J--Other Matters
Sec. 591. Establishment of Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps units for students in grades above sixth grade.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 592. Increase in number of private sector civilians authorized for admission to National Defense University.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 593. Admission of defense industry civilians to attend United States Air Force Institute of Technology.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 594. Date for submission of annual report on Department of Defense STARBASE Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 595. Extension of deadline for submission of final report of Military Leadership Diversity Commission.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 596. Enhanced authority for members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense and Coast Guard civilian employees and their families to accept gifts from non-Federal entities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 597. Report on performance and improvements of Transition Assistance Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 598. Sense of Congress regarding assisting members of the Armed Forces to participate in apprenticeship programs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 599. Report on expansion of number of heirloom chest awarded to surviving families.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 600. Increase of maximum age for children eligible for medical care under CHAMPVA program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 600A. Transfer of Troops-to-Teachers Program from Department of Education to Department of Defense.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 600B. Enhancements to the Troops-to-Teachers Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 600C. Support from Department of Education to help cover costs of new State programs under National Guard Youth Challenge Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 600D. Study of treatment of members of the reserve components.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE VI--COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS
Subtitle A--Pay and Allowances
Sec. 601. Fiscal year 2011 increase in military basic pay.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 602. Basic allowance for housing for two-member couples when one or both members are on sea duty.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 603. Allowances for purchase of required uniforms and equipment.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 604. Increase in amount of family separation allowance.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 605. One-time special compensation for transition of assistants providing aid and attendance care to members of the uniformed services with catastrophic injuries or illnesses.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 606. Expansion of definition of senior enlisted member to include senior enlisted member serving within a combatant command.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 607. Ineligibility of certain Federal civilian employees for Reservist income replacement payments on account of availability of comparable benefits under another program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays
Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve forces.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health care professionals.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 616. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of referral bonuses.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 617. Treatment of officers transferring between Armed Forces for receipt of aviation career special pay.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 618. Increase in maximum amount of special pay for duty subject to hostile fire or imminent danger or for duty in foreign area designated as an imminent danger area.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 619. Special payment to members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense killed or wounded in attacks directed at members or employees outside of combat zone, including those killed or wounded in certain 2009 attacks.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Travel and Transportation Allowances
Sec. 631. Extension of authority to provide travel and transportation allowances for inactive duty training outside of normal commuting distances.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 632. Travel and transportation allowances for attendance of designated persons at Yellow Ribbon Reintegration events.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 633. Mileage reimbursement for use of privately owned vehicles.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle D--Retired Pay and Survivor Benefits
Sec. 641. Elimination of cap on retired pay multiplier for members with greater than 30 years of service who retire for disability.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 642. Equity in computation of disability retired pay for reserve component members wounded in action.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 643. Elimination of the age requirement for health care benefits for non-regular service retirees.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 644. Clarification of effect of ordering reserve component member to active duty to receive authorized medical care on reducing eligibility age for receipt of non-regular service retired pay.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 645. Special survivor indemnity allowance for recipients of pre-Survivor Benefit Plan annuity affected by required offset for dependency and indemnity compensation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 646. Payment date for retired and retainer pay.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 647. Sense of Congress concerning age and service requirements for retired pay for non-regular service.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle E--Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and Operations
Sec. 651. Shared construction costs for shopping malls or similar facilities containing a commissary store and one or more nonappropriated fund instrumentality activities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 652. Addition of definition of morale, welfare, and recreation telephone services for use in contracts to provide such services for military personnel serving in combat zones.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 653. Feasibility study on establishment of full exchange store in the Northern Mariana Islands.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 654. Continued operation of commissary and exchange stores serving Brunswick Naval Air Station, Maine.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle F--Alternative Career Track Pilot Program
Sec. 661. Pilot program to evaluate alternative career track for commissioned officers to facilitate an increased commitment to academic and professional education and career-broadening assignments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle G--Other Matters
Sec. 671. Participation of members of the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship and Financial Assistance program in active duty health profession loan repayment program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 672. Retention of enlistment, reenlistment, and student loan benefits received by military technicians (dual status).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 673. Cancellation of loans of members of the Armed Forces made from student loan funds.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 674. Report on provision of additional incentives for recruitment and retention of health care professionals for reserve components.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 675. Flexible commencement dates for availability of homeowner assistance for members of the Armed Forces permanently reassigned during mortgage crisis.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 676. Exclusion of persons convicted of committing certain sex offenses from receiving certain burial-related benefits and funeral honors.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 677. Scholarship program for veterans for pursuit of graduate and post-graduate degrees in behavioral health sciences.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE VII--HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS
Subtitle A--Improvements to Health Benefits
Sec. 701. Extension of prohibition on increases in certain health care costs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 702. Extension of dependent coverage under TRICARE.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 703. Survivor dental benefits.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 704. Aural screenings for members of the Armed Forces.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 705. Temporary prohibition on increase in copayments under retail pharmacy system of pharmacy benefits program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 706. Suicide among members of the Individual Ready Reserve and individual mobilization augmentees.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 707. Provision of information to members of the reserve components regarding health care benefits.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Health Care Administration
Sec. 711. Administration of TRICARE.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 712. Updated terminology for the Army medical service corps.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 713. Clarification of licensure requirements applicable to military health-care professionals who are members of the national guard performing duty while in title 32 status.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 714. Annual report on joint health care facilities of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 715. Improvements to oversight of medical training for Medical Corps officers.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 716. Study on reimbursement for costs of health care provided to ineligible individuals.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 717. Limitation on transfer of funds to Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility demonstration project.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 718. Enterprise risk assessment of health information technology programs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Other Matters
Sec. 721. Improving aural protection for members of the Armed Forces.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 722. Comprehensive policy on neurocognitive assessment by the military health care system.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 723. National Casualty Care Research Center.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 724. Report on feasibility of study on breast cancer among female members of the Armed Forces.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 725. Assessment of post-traumatic stress disorder by military occupation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 726. Visiting NIH Senior Neuroscience Fellowship Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 727. Pilot program on payment for treatment of members of the Armed Forces and veterans for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 728. Post-traumatic stress disorder counseling for civilian victims of the Fort Hood shooting and other similar incidents.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 729. Sense of Congress concerning the implementation of the congressionally-mandated recommendations of the Institute of Medicine study.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE VIII--ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED MATTERS
Subtitle A--Acquisition Policy and Management
Sec. 801. Disclosure to litigation support contractors.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 802. Designation of F135 and F136 engine development and procurement programs as major subprograms.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 803. Conforming amendments relating to inclusion of major subprograms to major defense acquisition programs under various acquisition-related requirements.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 804. Enhancement of Department of Defense authority to respond to combat and safety emergencies through rapid acquisition and deployment of urgently needed supplies.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 805. Prohibition on contracts with entities engaging in commercial activity in the energy sector of Iran.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and Limitations
Sec. 811. Extension of authority to procure certain fibers; limitation on specification.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 812. Small arms production industrial base matters.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 813. Additional definition relating to production of specialty metals within the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Studies and Reports
Sec. 821. Studies to analyze alternative models for acquisition and funding of technologies supporting network-centric operations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 822. Annual joint report and Comptroller General review on contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 823. Extension of Comptroller General review and report on contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 824. Interim report on review of impact of covered subsidies on acquisition of KC-45 aircraft.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 825. Reports on Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle D--Other Matters
Sec. 831. Extension of authority for defense acquisition challenge program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 832. Energy savings performance contracts.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 833. Consideration of sustainable practices in procurement of products and services.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 834. Definition of materials critical to national security.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 835. Determination of strategic or critical rare earth materials for defense applications.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 836. Review of national security exception to competition.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 837. Inclusion of bribery in disclosure requirements of the Federal awardee performance and integrity information system.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 838. Requirement for entities with facility clearances that are not under foreign ownership control or influence mitigation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 839. Report related to minority-owned, women-owned, and disadvantaged-owned small businesses.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 840. Defense industrial base priority for rare earth neodymium iron boron magnets.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 841. Sense of Congress regarding cost savings through reductions in waste, fraud, and abuse.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 842. Procurement of articles, materials, and supplies for use outside the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 843. Additional information on waivers under Buy American Act by Department of Defense required to be included in annual report.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 844. Requirement to include effects on domestic jobs in periodic assessments of defense capability.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 845. Extension of regulations on contractors performing private security functions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 846. Procurement of photovoltaic devices.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 847. Requirement for contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan to use employees and not independent contractors for private security services.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 848. Consideration of unfair competitive advantage in evaluation of offers for KC-X aerial refueling aircraft program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 849. Debarment of BP and its subsidiaries.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 850. Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act amendments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 851. Requirement to justify the use of factors other than cost or price as the predominate factors in evaluating competitive proposals for defense procurement contracts.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 852. Penalties on contractors not providing information to databases on contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE IX--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
Subtitle A--Department of Defense Management
Sec. 901. Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 902. Realignment of the organizational structure of the Office of the Secretary of Defense to carry out the reduction required by law in the number of Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 903. Unified medical command.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Space Activities
Sec. 911. Integrated space architectures.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Intelligence-Related Matters
Sec. 921. Five-year extension of authority for Secretary of Defense to engage in commercial activities as security for intelligence collection activities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 922. Space and counterspace intelligence analysis.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 923. Audits of intelligence community by Government Accountability Office.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle D--Other Matters
Sec. 931. Revisions to the board of regents for the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 932. Increased flexibility for Combatant Commander Initiative Fund.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 933. Two-year extension of authorities relating to temporary waiver of reimbursement of costs of activities for nongovernmental personnel at Department of Defense Regional Centers for Security Studies.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 934. Additional requirements for quadrennial roles and missions review in 2011.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 935. Codification of congressional notification requirement before permanent relocation of any United States military unit stationed outside the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE X--GENERAL PROVISIONS
Subtitle A--Financial Matters
Sec. 1001. General transfer authority.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1002. Authorization of additional appropriations for operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Haiti for fiscal year 2010.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1003. Budgetary effects of this Act.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Counter-Drug Activities
Sec. 1011. Unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1012. Joint task forces support to law enforcement agencies conducting counterterrorism activities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1013. Reporting requirement on expenditures to support foreign counter-drug activities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1014. Support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Naval Vessels and Shipyards
Sec. 1021. Requirements for long-range plan for construction of naval vessels.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1022. Requirements for the decommissioning of naval vessels.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1023. Requirements for the size of the Navy battle force fleet.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1024. Retention and status of certain naval vessels.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1025. Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the naming of a naval combat vessel after Father Vincent Capodanno.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle D--Counterterrorism
Sec. 1031. Extension of certain authority for making rewards for combating terrorism.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1032. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1033. Certification requirements relating to the transfer of individuals detained at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to foreign countries and other foreign entities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1034. Prohibition on the use of funds to modify or construct facilities in the United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1035. Comprehensive review of force protection policies.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1036. Fort Hood Follow-on Review Implementation Fund.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1037. Inspector General investigation of the conduct and practices of lawyers representing individuals detained at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1038. Prohibition on use of funds to give Miranda warnings to Al Qaeda terrorists.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle E--Studies and Reports
Sec. 1041. Department of Defense aerospace-related mishap safety investigation reports.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1042. Interagency national security knowledge and skills.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1043. Report on establishing a Northeast Regional Joint Training Center.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1044. Comptroller General report on previously requested reports.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1045. Report on nuclear triad.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1046. Cybersecurity study and report.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1047. Study on common alignment of world regions in departments and agencies with international responsibilities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1048. Required reports concerning bomber modernization, sustainment, and recapitalization efforts in support of the national defense strategy.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle F--Other Matters
Sec. 1051. National Defense Panel.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1052. Quadrennial defense review.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1053. Sale of surplus military equipment to State and local homeland security and emergency management agencies.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1054. Department of Defense rapid innovation program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1055. Technical and clerical amendments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1056. Budgeting for the sustainment and modernization of nuclear delivery systems.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1057. Limitation on nuclear force reductions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1058. Sense of Congress on the Nuclear Posture Review.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1059. Strategic assessment of strategic challenges posed by potential competitors.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1060. Electronic access to certain classified information.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1061. Justice for victims of torture and terrorism.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1062. Policy regarding appropriate use of Department of Defense resources.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1063. Executive agent for preventing the introduction of counterfeit microelectronics into the defense supply chain.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1064. Shared information regarding training exercises.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1065. Sense of Congress regarding presidential letters of condolence to the families of members of the Armed Forces who have died by suicide.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1066. Findings and sense of Congress on Obesity and Federal Child Nutrition Programs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1067. Sense of Congress regarding recreational hunting and fishing on military installations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1068. Sense of Congress encouraging the President to order the United States flag to be flown over United States military and civilian outposts in Haiti during earthquake relief efforts.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1069. Study on optimal balance of manned and unmanned aerial vehicle capability.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XI--CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS
Sec. 1101. Authority for the Department of Defense to approve an alternate method of processing equal employment opportunity complaints within one or more component organizations under specified circumstances.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1102. Clarification of authorities at personnel demonstration laboratories.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1103. Special rule relating to certain overtime pay.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1104. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees working overseas.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1105. Waiver of certain pay limitations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1106. Services of post-combat case coordinators.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1107. Authority to waive maximum age limit for certain appointments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1108. Sense of Congress regarding waiver of recovery of certain payments made under civilian employees voluntary separation incentive program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1109. Suspension of DCIPS pay authority extended for a year.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1110. Federal Internship Programs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XII--MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS
Subtitle A--Assistance and Training
Sec. 1201. Expansion of authority for support of special operations to combat terrorism.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1202. Addition of allied government agencies to enhanced logistics interoperability authority.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1203. Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to build the capacity of foreign military forces.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1204. Air Force scholarships for Partnership for Peace nations to participate in the Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan
Sec. 1211. Limitation on availability of funds for certain purposes relating to Iraq.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1212. Commanders’ Emergency Response Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1213. Modification of authority for reimbursement to certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1214. Modification of report on responsible redeployment of United States Armed Forces from Iraq.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1215. Modification of reports relating to Afghanistan.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1216. No permanent military bases in Afghanistan.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1217. Authority to use funds for reintegration activities in Afghanistan.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1218. One-year extension of Pakistan Counterinsurgency Fund.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1219. Authority to use funds to provide support to coalition forces supporting military and stability operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1220. Requirement to provide United States brigade and equivalent units deployed to Afghanistan with the commensurate level of unit and theater-wide combat enablers.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1221. Limitation on availability of funds for elections in Afghanistan.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1222. Recommendations on oversight of contractors engaged in activities relating to Afghanistan.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1223. Report on long-term costs of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Other Matters
Sec. 1231. NATO Special Operations Coordination Center.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1232. National Military Strategic Plan to Counter Iran.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1233. Report on Department of Defense’s plans to reform the export control system.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1234. Report on United States efforts to defend against threats posed by the advanced anti-access capabilities of potentially hostile foreign countries.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1235. Report on force structure changes in composition and capabilities at military installations in Europe.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1236. Sense of Congress on missile defense and New Start Treaty with Russian Federation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1237. Report on the strategic implications of the successful negotiation of an incidents at sea agreement between the United States and the Government of Iran.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1238. Requirement to monitor and evaluate Department of Defense activities to counter violent extremism in Africa.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1239. Report on certain Iraqis affiliated with the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XIII--COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION
Sec. 1301. Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction programs and funds.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1302. Funding allocations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XIV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS
Subtitle A--Military Programs
Sec. 1401. Working capital funds.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1402. Study on working capital fund cash balances.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1403. Modification of certain working capital fund requirements.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1404. Reduction of unobligated balances within the Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Revolving Fund.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1405. National Defense Sealift Fund.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1406. Chemical agents and munitions destruction, defense.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1407. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1408. Defense Inspector General.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1409. Defense Health Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--National Defense Stockpile
Sec. 1411. Authorized uses of National Defense Stockpile funds.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1412. Revision to required receipt objectives for previously authorized disposals from the National Defense Stockpile.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Other Matters
Sec. 1421. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1422. Plan for funding fuel infrastructure sustainment, restoration, and modernization requirements.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XV--AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS
Sec. 1501. Purpose.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1502. Army procurement.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1503. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1504. Navy and Marine Corps procurement.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1505. Air Force procurement.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1506. Defense-wide activities procurement.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1507. Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1508. National Guard and Reserve equipment.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1509. Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle Fund.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1510. Research, development, test, and evaluation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1511. Operation and maintenance.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1512. Limitations on availability of funds in Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1513. Limitations on Iraq Security Forces Fund.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1514. Military personnel.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1515. Working capital funds.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1516. Defense Health Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1517. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1518. Defense Inspector General.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1519. Continuation of prohibition on use of United States funds for certain facilities projects in Iraq.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1520. Availability of funds for rapid force protection in Afghanistan.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1522. Special transfer authority.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1523. Report on mine resistant ambush protected vehicles.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XVI--IMPROVED SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE IN THE ARMED FORCES
Sec. 1601. Definition of Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and response program and other definitions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle A--Immediate Actions to Improve Department of Defense Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Program
Sec. 1611. Specific budgeting for Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and response program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1612. Consistency in terminology, position descriptions, program standards, and organizational structures.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1613. Guidance for commanders.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1614. Commander consultation with victims of sexual assault.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1615. Oversight and evaluation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1616. Sexual assault reporting hotline.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1617. Review of application of sexual assault prevention and response program to reserve components.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1618. Review of effectiveness of revised Uniform Code of Military Justice offenses regarding rape, sexual assault, and other sexual misconduct.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1619. Training and education programs for sexual assault prevention and response program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1620. Use of sexual assault forensic medical examiners.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1621. Sexual Assault Advisory Board.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1622. Department of Defense Sexual Assault Advisory Council.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1623. Service-level sexual assault review boards.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1624. Renewed emphasis on acquisition of centralized Department of Defense sexual assault database.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Sexual Assault Prevention Strategy and Annual Reporting Requirement
Sec. 1631. Comprehensive Department of Defense sexual assault prevention strategy.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1632. Annual report on sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces and sexual assault prevention and response program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Amendments to Title 10
Sec. 1641. Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1642. Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1643. Sexual assault victims access to legal counsel and Victim Advocate services.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1644. Notification of command of outcome of court-martial involving charges of sexual assault.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1645. Copy of record of court-martial to victim of sexual assault involving a member of the Armed Forces.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1646. Medical care for victims of sexual assault.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1647. Privilege against disclosure of certain communications with Sexual Assault Victim Advocates.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1648. Expedited consideration and priority for application for consideration of a permanent change of station or unit transfer based on humanitarian conditions for victim of sexual assault.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle D--Other Matters
Sec. 1661. Recruiter selection and oversight.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1662. Availability of services under sexual assault prevention and response program for dependents of members, military retirees, Department of Defense civilian employees, and defense contractor employees.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1663. Application of sexual assault prevention and response program in training environments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1664. Application of sexual assault prevention and response program in remote environments and joint basing situations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XVII--FEDERAL INFORMATION SECURITY
Subtitle A--Federal Information Security Amendments
Sec. 1701. Coordination of Federal Information Policy.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1702. Information security acquisition requirements.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1703. Technical and conforming amendments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1704. Effective date.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Federal Chief Technology Officer
Sec. 1711. Office of the Chief Technology Officer.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XVIII--GUAM WORLD WAR II LOYALTY RECOGNITION ACT
Sec. 1801. Short title.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1802. Recognition of the suffering and loyalty of the residents of Guam.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1803. Payments for Guam World War II claims.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1804. Adjudication.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1805. Grants program to memorialize the occupation of Guam during World War II.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1806. Authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
DIVISION B--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS
Sec. 2001. Short title.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2003. Effective date.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2004. General reduction across division.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XXI--ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects and authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2102. Family housing.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2103. Use of unobligated Army military construction funds in conjunction with funds provided by the Commonwealth of Virginia to carry out certain fiscal year 2002 project.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2104. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2009 project.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2106. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 projects.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XXII--NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects and authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2202. Family housing.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2203. Technical amendment to reflect multi-increment fiscal year 2010 project.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2204. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2008 project.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XXIII--AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects and authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2302. Family housing.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2303. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2007 project.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XXIV--DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
Subtitle A--Defense Agency Authorizations
Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects and authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2402. Family housing.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2403. Energy conservation projects.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations
Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, defense-wide.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2412. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2000 project.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XXV--NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM
Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XXVI--GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES
Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects and authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects and authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects and authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects and authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects and authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2606. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 projects.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XXVII--BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES
Subtitle A--Authorizations
Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 1990.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2702. Authorized base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2703. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Other Matters
Sec. 2711. Transportation plan for BRAC 133 project under Fort Belvoir, Virginia, BRAC initiative.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XXVIII--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS
Subtitle A--Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes
Sec. 2801. Availability of military construction information on Internet.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2802. Authority to transfer proceeds from sale of military family housing to Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2803. Enhanced authority for provision of excess contributions for NATO Security Investment program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2804. Duration of authority to use Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Revolving Fund for construction and repairs at Pentagon Reservation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2805. Authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects inside the United States Central Command area of responsibility.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2806. Veterans to Work pilot program for military construction projects.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Real Property and Facilities Administration
Sec. 2811. Notice-and-wait requirements applicable to real property transactions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2812. Treatment of proceeds generated from leases of non-excess property involving military museums.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2813. Repeal of expired authority to lease land for special operations activities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2814. Former Naval Bombardment Area, Culebra Island, Puerto Rico.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2815. Clarification of authority of Secretary to assist with development of public infrastructure in connection with the establishment or expansion of a military installation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Provisions Related to Guam Realignment
Sec. 2821. Sense of Congress regarding importance of providing community adjustment assistance to Government of Guam.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2822. Department of Defense assistance for community adjustments related to realignment of military installations and relocation of military personnel on Guam.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2823. Extension of term of Deputy Secretary of Defense’s leadership of Guam Oversight Council.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2824. Utility conveyances to support integrated water and wastewater treatment system on Guam.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2825. Report on types of facilities required to support Guam realignment.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2826. Report on civilian infrastructure needs for Guam.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2827. Comptroller General report on planned replacement Naval Hospital on Guam.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle D--Energy Security
Sec. 2831. Consideration of environmentally sustainable practices in Department energy performance plan.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2832. Plan and implementation guidelines for achieving Department of Defense goal regarding use of renewable energy to meet facility energy needs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2833. Insulation retrofitting assessment for Department of Defense facilities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle E--Land Conveyances
Sec. 2841. Conveyance of personal property related to waste-to-energy power plant serving Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2842. Land conveyance, Whittier Petroleum, Oil, and Lubricant Tank Farm, Whittier, Alaska.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2843. Land conveyance, Fort Knox, Kentucky.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2844. Land conveyance, Naval Support Activity (West Bank), New Orleans, Louisiana.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2845. Land conveyance, former Navy Extremely Low Frequency communications project site, Republic, Michigan.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2846. Land conveyance, Marine Forces Reserve Center, Wilmington, North Carolina.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle F--Other Matters
Sec. 2851. Requirements related to providing world class military medical facilities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2852. Naming of Armed Forces Reserve Center, Middletown, Connecticut.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XXIX--OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
Subtitle A--Fiscal Year 2010 Projects
Sec. 2901. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects and authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2902. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects and authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Fiscal Year 2011 Projects
Sec. 2911. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects and authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2912. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects and authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2913. Authorized Defense Wide Construction and Land Acquisition Projects and Authorization of Appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 2914. Construction authorization for Department of Defense facilities in a foreign country.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Other Matters
Sec. 2921. Notification of obligation of funds and quarterly reports.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
DIVISION C--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS
TITLE XXXI--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS
Subtitle A--National Security Programs Authorizations
Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 3103. Other defense activities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 3104. Energy security and assurance.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations
Sec. 3111. Extension of authority relating to the International Materials Protection, Control, and Accounting Program of the Department of Energy.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 3112. Energy parks initiative.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 3113. Establishment of technology transfer centers.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 3114. Aircraft procurement.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 3115. Enhancing private-sector employment through technology transfer activities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Reports
Sec. 3121. Comptroller General report on NNSA biennial complex modernization strategy.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 3122. Report on graded security protection policy.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XXXII--DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD
Sec. 3201. Authorization.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XXXIV--NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES
Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE XXXV--MARITIME ADMINISTRATION
Sec. 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the merchant marine for fiscal year 2011.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 3502. Extension of Maritime Security Fleet program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 3503. United States Merchant Marine Academy nominations of residents of the Northern Mariana Islands.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 3504. Administrative expenses for Port of Guam Improvement Enterprise Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 3505. Vessel loan guarantees: procedures for traditional and nontraditional applications.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
DIVISION D--IMPLEMENTING MANAGEMENT FOR PERFORMANCE AND RELATED REFORMS TO OBTAIN VALUE IN EVERY ACQUISITION ACT
Sec. 100A. Short title.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 100B. Definition of congressional defense committees.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE I--DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM
Sec. 101. Performance management of the defense acquisition system.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 102. Meaningful consideration by Joint Requirements Oversight Council of input from certain officials.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 103. Performance management for the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 104. Requirements for the acquisition of services.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 105. Joint evaluation task forces.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 106. Review of defense acquisition guidance.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 107. Requirement to include references to services acquisition throughout the Federal Acquisition Regulation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 108. Procurement of military purpose nondevelopmental items.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE II--DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE
Sec. 201. Acquisition workforce excellence.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 202. Amendments to the acquisition workforce demonstration project.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 203. Incentive programs for civilian and military personnel in the acquisition workforce.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 204. Career development for civilian and military personnel in the acquisition workforce.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 205. Recertification and training requirements.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 206. Information technology acquisition workforce.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 207. Definition of acquisition workforce.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 208. Defense Acquisition University curriculum review.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 209. Cost estimating internship and scholarship programs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 210. Prohibition on personal services contracts for senior mentors.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE III--FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Sec. 301. Incentives for achieving auditability.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 302. Measures required after failure to achieve auditability.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 303. Review of obligation and expenditure thresholds.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 304. Disclosure and traceability of the cost of Department of Defense health care contracts.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE IV--INDUSTRIAL BASE
Sec. 401. Expansion of the industrial base.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 402. Commercial pricing analysis.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 403. Contractor and grantee disclosure of delinquent Federal tax debts.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 404. Independence of contract audits and business system reviews.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 405. Blue ribbon panel on eliminating barriers to contracting with the Department of Defense.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 406. Inclusion of the providers of services and information technology in the national technology and industrial base.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 407. Construction of Act on competition requirements for the acquisition of services.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 408. Acquisition Savings Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 409. Sense of Congress regarding compliance with the Berry Amendment, the Buy American Act, and labor standards of the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 410. Industrial Base Council and Fund.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE V--OTHER MATTERS
Sec. 501. Clothing allowance requirement.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 502. Requirement that cost or price to the Federal Government be given at least equal importance as technical or other criteria in evaluating competitive proposals for defense contracts.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES.
For purposes of this Act, the term ‘congressional defense committees’ has the meaning given that term in
SEC. 4. TREATMENT OF SUCCESSOR CONTINGENCY OPERATION TO OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM.
Any law or regulation applicable to Operation Iraqi Freedom shall apply in the same manner and to the same extent to the successor contingency operation known as Operation New Dawn, except as specifically provided in this Act, any amendment made by this Act, or any other law enacted after the date of the enactment of this Act.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE I--PROCUREMENTCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE I--PROCUREMENTCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle A--Authorization of AppropriationsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle A--Authorization of AppropriationsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 101. ARMY.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for procurement for the Army as follows:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) For aircraft, $5,986,361,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) For missiles, $1,631,463,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) For weapons and tracked combat vehicles, $1,616,245,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) For ammunition, $1,946,948,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) For other procurement, $9,398,728,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 102. NAVY AND MARINE CORPS.
(a) Navy- Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for procurement for the Navy as follows:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) For aircraft, $19,132,613,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) For weapons, including missiles and torpedoes, $3,350,894,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) For shipbuilding and conversion, $15,724,520,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) For other procurement, $6,450,208,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Marine Corps- Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for procurement for the Marine Corps in the amount of $1,379,044,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Navy and Marine Corps Ammunition- Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for procurement of ammunition for the Navy and the Marine Corps in the amount of $817,991,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 103. AIR FORCE.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for procurement for the Air Force as follows:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) For aircraft, $15,355,908,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) For ammunition, $672,420,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) For missiles, $5,470,772,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) For other procurement, $17,911,730,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 104. DEFENSE-WIDE ACTIVITIES.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for Defense-wide procurement in the amount of $4,399,768,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Army ProgramsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Army ProgramsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 111. PROCUREMENT OF EARLY INFANTRY BRIGADE COMBAT TEAM INCREMENT ONE EQUIPMENT.
(a) Limitation on Production Quantities- Except as provided in subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense may not procure more than two brigade sets of early-infantry brigade combat team increment one equipment (in this section referred to as a ‘brigade set’).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Applicability to Long-lead Production Items- The limitation in subsection (a) includes procurement of a long-lead item for an element of a brigade set beyond the two brigade sets authorized under such subsection.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Waiver- The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics may waive the limitation in subsection (a) if--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) the Under Secretary submits to Congress written certification that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) the initial operational test and evaluation of the brigade set has been completed;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation has submitted to Congress a report describing the results of the initial operational test and evaluation (as described in
(C) all of the subsystems tested in the initial operational test and evaluation were tested in the intended production configuration; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) all radios planned for fielding with the brigade set have received the appropriate National Security Agency approvals, as determined by the Under Secretary; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) a period of 30 days has elapsed after the date on which the certification under paragraph (1) is received.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Exception for Meeting Operational Need Statement Requirements- The limitation in subsection (a) does not apply to the procurement of individual components of the brigade set if the procurement of such components is specifically intended to address an operational need statement requirement (as described in Army Regulation 71-9 or a successor regulation).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 112. REPORT ON ARMY BATTLEFIELD NETWORK PLANS AND PROGRAMS.
(a) Report Required- Not later than March 1, 2011, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on plans for fielding tactical communications network equipment. Such report shall include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) an explanation of the current communications architecture of every level of the Army;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) an explanation of the future communications architecture of every level of the Army;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) the quantities and types of new equipment that the Secretary plans to procure in the 5-year period following the date on which the report is submitted in order to develop the architecture described in paragraph (2);CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) a list of the equipment described in paragraph (3) that is included in the budget of the President for fiscal year 2012 (as submitted to Congress pursuant to
(5) for each item included in the list of equipment described in paragraph (3)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) an updated average procurement unit cost for each year of the covered 5-year period; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) the updated total Army acquisition objective.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Limitation on Obligation of Funds- Except as provided in subsection (c), of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this or any other Act for fiscal year 2011 for procurement, Army, for tactical radios or tactical communications network equipment, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date that is 15 days after the date on which the report is submitted under subsection (a).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Exception for Meeting Operational Need Statement Requirements- The limitation in subsection (b) does not apply to the procurement of tactical radio or tactical communications network equipment if the procurement of such equipment is specifically intended to address an operational need statement requirement (as described in Army Regulation 71-9 or a successor regulation).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Tactical Communications Network Equipment Defined- In this section, the term ‘tactical communications network equipment’ means all electronic communications systems operated by a tactical unit (of brigade size or smaller) of the Army.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 113. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR LINE-HAUL TRACTORS.
(a) Limitation- None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 101(5) for other procurement, Army, may be obligated or expended by the Secretary of the Army for line-haul tractors unless the source selection is made based on a full and open competition.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Waiver- The Secretary of the Army may waive the limitation under subsection (a) if the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees by not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act that a sole source selection--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) is needed to fulfill mission requirements; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) is more cost effective than a full and open competition.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Navy ProgramsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Navy ProgramsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 121. INCREMENTAL FUNDING FOR PROCUREMENT OF LARGE NAVAL VESSELS.
(a) Incremental Funding of Large Naval Vessels- Except as provided in subsection (b), the Secretary of the Navy may use incremental funding for the procurement of a large naval vessel over a period not to exceed the number of years equal to three-fourths of the total period of planned ship construction of such vessel.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) LPD 26- With respect to the vessel designated LPD 26, the Secretary may use incremental funding for the procurement of such vessel through fiscal year 2012 if the Secretary determines that such incremental funding--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) is in the best interest of the overall shipbuilding efforts of the Navy;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) is needed to provide the Secretary with the ability to facilitate changes to the shipbuilding industrial base of the Navy; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) will provide the Secretary with the ability to award a contract for construction of the vessel that provides the best value to the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Condition for Out-year Contract Payments- A contract entered into under subsection (a) or (b) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after the fiscal year the vessel was authorized is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for that later fiscal year.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Definitions- In this section:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) The term ‘large naval vessel’ means a vessel--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) that is--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) an aircraft carrier designated a CVN;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) an amphibious assault ship designated LPD, LHA, LHD, or LSD; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iii) an auxiliary vessel; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) that has a light ship displacement of 17,000 tons or more.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) The term ‘total period of planned ship construction’ means the period of years beginning on the date of the first authorization of funding (not including funding requested for advance procurement) and ending on the date that is projected on the date of the first authorization of funding to be the delivery date of the vessel to the Navy.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 122. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT OF F/A-18E, F/A-18F, AND EA-18G AIRCRAFT.
(a) Multiyear Procurement-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY- Section 128 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (
‘(e) Updated Report- With respect to a multiyear contract entered into under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may submit to the congressional defense committees an update to the report under
, by not later than September 1, 2010.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink section 2306b(l)(4) of title 10, United States Code ‘(f) Required Authority- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, with respect to a multiyear contract entered into under subsection (a), this section shall be deemed to meet the requirements under subsection (i)(3) and (l)(3) of
.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink section 2306b of title 10, United States Code ‘(g) Exception to Certain Requirement- Section 8008(b) of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1998 (
; Public Law 105-56 note) shall not apply to a multiyear contract entered into under subsection (a).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink 10 U.S.C. 2306b ‘(h) Use of Funds-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) PROCUREMENT- In accordance with paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that all funds authorized to be appropriated for the advance procurement or procurement of F/A-18E, F/A-18F, or EA-18G aircraft under this section are obligated or expended for such purpose.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) USE OF EXCESS FUNDS- The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that any excess funds are obligated or expended for the advance procurement or procurement of F/A-18E or F/A-18F aircraft under this section, regardless of whether such aircraft are in addition to the 515 F/A-18E and F/A-18F aircraft planned by the Secretary of the Navy.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(3) EXCESS FUNDS DEFINED- In this subsection, the term ‘excess funds’, with respect to funds available for the advance procurement or procurement of F/A-18E, F/A-18F, or EA-18G aircraft under this section, means the amount of funds that is equal to the difference of--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(A) the sum of--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(i) the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise available for fiscal year 2010 for the advance procurement and procurement of F/A-18E, F/A-18F, or EA-18G aircraft; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(ii) the funding levels for the advance procurement and procurement of such aircraft for fiscal years 2011 through 2013 proposed by the Secretary of Defense in the future-years defense program for fiscal year 2011 submitted under
; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink section 221 of title 10, United States Code ‘(B) the funds required to execute the multiyear contracts for the advance procurement and procurement of such aircraft under this section.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) EXTENSION OF CERTIFICATION- Paragraph (2) of subsection (a) of such section is amended by striking ‘a reference to March’ and inserting ‘a reference to September’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Full Funding Certification- Paragraph (1) of section 8011 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2010 (
SEC. 123. REPORT ON NAVAL FORCE STRUCTURE AND MISSILE DEFENSE.
(a) Report- Not later than March 1, 2011, the Secretary of the Navy, in coordination with the Chief of Naval Operations, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the requirements of the major combatant surface vessels with respect to missile defense.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Matters Included- The report shall include the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) An analysis of whether the requirement for sea-based missile defense can be accommodated by upgrading Aegis ships that exist as of the date of the report or by procuring additional combatant surface vessels.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) Whether such sea-based missile defense will require increasing the overall number of combatant surface vessels beyond the requirement of 88 cruisers and destroyers in the 313-ship fleet plan of the Navy.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) The number of Aegis ships needed by each combatant commander to fulfill ballistic missile defense requirements, including (in consultation with the Chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff) the number of such ships needed to support the phased, adaptive approach to ballistic missile defense in Europe.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) A discussion of the potential effect of ballistic missile defense operations on the ability of the Navy to meet surface fleet demands in each geographic area and for each mission set.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) An evaluation of how the Aegis ballistic missile defense program can succeed as part of a balanced fleet of adequate size and strength to meet the security needs of the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) A description of both the shortfalls and the benefits of expected technological advancements in the sea-based missile defense program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(7) A description of the anticipated plan for deployment of Aegis ballistic missile ships within the context of the fleet response plan.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle D--Air Force ProgramsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle D--Air Force ProgramsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 131. PRESERVATION AND STORAGE OF UNIQUE TOOLING FOR F-22 FIGHTER AIRCRAFT.
Subsection (b) of section 133 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (
Subtitle E--Joint and Multiservice MattersCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle E--Joint and Multiservice MattersCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 141. LIMITATION ON PROCUREMENT OF F-35 LIGHTNING II AIRCRAFT.
(a) Limitation- Except as provided in subsection (c), of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2011 for aircraft procurement, Air Force, and aircraft procurement, Navy, for F-35 Lightning II aircraft, not more than an amount necessary for the procurement of 30 such aircraft may be obligated or expended unless--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) the certifications under subsection (b) are received by the congressional defense committees on or before January 15, 2011; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) a period of 15 days has elapsed after the date of such receipt.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Certifications- Not later than January 15, 2011--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall certify in writing to the congressional defense committees that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) each of the 11 scheduled system development and demonstration aircraft planned in the schedule for delivery during 2010 has been delivered to the designated test location;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) the initial service release has been granted for the F135 engine designated for the short take-off and vertical landing variant;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) facility configuration and industrial tooling capability and capacity is sufficient to support production of at least 42 F-35 aircraft for fiscal year 2011;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) block 1.0 software has been released and is in flight test;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(E) the Secretary of Defense has--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) determined that two F-35 aircraft from low-rate initial production 1 have met established criteria for acceptance; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) accepted such aircraft for delivery; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(F) advance procurement funds appropriated for the advance procurement of F136 engines for fiscal years 2009 and 2010 have either been obligated or the Secretary of Defense has submitted a reprogramming action to the congressional defense committees that would reprogram such funds to meet other F136 development requirements; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall certify in writing to the congressional defense committees that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) the F-35C aircraft designated as CF-1 has effectively accomplished its first flight;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) the 394 F-35 aircraft test flights planned in the schedule to occur during 2010 have been completed with sufficient results;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) 95 percent of the 3,772 flight test points planned for completion in 2010 were accomplished;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) the conventional take-off and land variant low observable signature flight test has been conducted and the results of such test have met or exceeded threshold key performance parameters;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(E) six F136 engines have been made available for testing; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(F) not less than 1,000 test hours have been completed in the F136 system development and demonstration program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Waiver- After January 15, 2011, the Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation in subsection (a) if each of the following occurs:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) The written certification described in subsection (b)(1) is submitted by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics not later than January 15, 2011.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics certifies in writing to the congressional defense committees that the failure to fully achieve the milestones described in subsection (b)(2) will not--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) delay or otherwise negatively affect the F-35 aircraft test schedule for fiscal year 2011;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) impede production of 42 F-35 aircraft in such fiscal year; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) otherwise increase risk to the F-35 aircraft program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) A period of 30 days has elapsed after the date on which the certification under paragraph (2) is submitted to the congressional defense committees.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Schedule Defined- In this section, the term ‘schedule’ means the F-35 Lightning II program update schedule received by the congressional defense committees on March 15, 2010.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 142. LIMITATIONS ON BIOMETRIC SYSTEMS FUNDS.
(a) General Limitation- Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2011 for biometrics programs and operations, not more than 85 percent may be obligated or expended until--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report on the actions taken--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) to implement subparagraphs (A) through (F) of paragraph (16) of the National Security Presidential Directive dated June 5, 2008 (NSPD-59);CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) to implement the recommendations of the Comptroller General of the United States included in the report of the Comptroller General numbered GAO-08-1065 dated September 2008;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) to implement the recommendations of the Comptroller General included in the report of the Comptroller General numbered GAO-09-49 dated October 2008;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) to fully and completely characterize the current biometrics architecture and establish the objective architecture for the Department of Defense;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(E) to ensure that an official of the Office of the Secretary of Defense has the authority necessary to be responsible for ensuring that all funding for biometrics programs and operations is programmed, budgeted, and executed; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(F) to ensure that an officer within the Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has the authority necessary to be responsible for ensuring the development and implementation of common and interoperable standards for the collection, storage, and use of biometrics data by all combatant commanders and their commands; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) a period of 30 days has elapsed after the date on which the report is submitted under paragraph (1).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Specific Limitation- None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2011 for biometrics programs and operations may be obligated or expended unless the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (acting through the Director of Defense Biometrics) approves such obligation or expenditure in writing.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 143. COUNTER-IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE INITIATIVES DATABASE.
(a) Comprehensive Database-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization, shall develop and maintain a comprehensive database containing appropriate information for coordinating, tracking, and archiving each counter-improvised explosive device initiative within the Department of Defense. The database shall, at a minimum, ensure the visibility of each counter-improvised explosive device initiative.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) USE OF INFORMATION- Using information contained in the database developed under paragraph (1), the Secretary, acting through the Director of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization, shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) identify and eliminate redundant counter-improvised explosive device initiatives;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) facilitate the transition of counter-improvised explosive device initiatives from funding under the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund to funding provided by the military departments; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) notify the appropriate personnel and organizations prior to a counter-improvised explosive device initiative being funded through the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) COORDINATION- In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary shall ensure that the Secretary of each military department coordinates and collaborates on development of the database to ensure its interoperability, completeness, consistency, and effectiveness.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Metrics- The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization, shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) develop appropriate means to measure the effectiveness of counter-improvised explosive device initiatives; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) prioritize the funding of such initiatives according to such means.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Elimination of Prior Notice Requirement- Subsection (c) of section 1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (
(1) by striking paragraph (4); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (4).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Counter-improvised Explosive Device Initiative Defined- In this section, the term ‘counter-improvised explosive device initiative’ means any project, program, or research activity funded by any component of the Department of Defense that is intended to assist or support efforts to counter, combat, or defeat the use of improvised explosive devices.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 144. STUDY ON LIGHTWEIGHT BODY ARMOR SOLUTIONS.
(a) Study Required- The Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct a study to--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) assess the effectiveness of the processes used by the Secretary to identify and examine the requirements for lighter weight body armor systems; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) determine ways in which the Secretary may more effectively address the research, development, and procurement requirements regarding reducing the weight of body armor.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Matters Covered- The study conducted under subsection (a) shall include findings and recommendations regarding the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) The requirement for lighter weight body armor and personal protective equipment and the ability of the Secretary to meet such requirement.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) Innovative design ideas for more modular body armor that allow for scalable protection levels for various missions and threats.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) The need for research, development, and acquisition funding dedicated specifically for reducing the weight of body armor.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) The efficiency and effectiveness of current body armor funding procedures and processes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) Industry concerns, capabilities, and willingness to invest in the development and production of lightweight body armor initiatives.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) Barriers preventing the development of lighter weight body armor (including such barriers with respect to technical, institutional, or financial problems).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(7) Changes to procedures or policy with respect to lightweight body armor.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(8) Other areas of concern not previously addressed by equipping boards, body armor producers, or program managers.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Submission to Congress- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the study conducted under subsection (a).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE II--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATIONCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE II--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATIONCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle A--Authorization of AppropriationsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle A--Authorization of AppropriationsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation as follows:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) For the Army, $10,316,754,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) For the Navy, $17,978,646,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) For the Air Force, $27,269,902,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) For Defense-wide activities, $20,908,006,000, of which $194,910,000 is authorized for the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Program Requirements, Restrictions, and LimitationsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Program Requirements, Restrictions, and LimitationsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 211. REPORT REQUIREMENTS FOR REPLACEMENT PROGRAM OF THE OHIO-CLASS BALLISTIC MISSILE SUBMARINE.
(a) Findings- Congress makes the following findings:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) The sea-based strategic deterrence provided by the ballistic missile submarine force of the Navy has been essential to the national security of the United States since the deployment of the first ballistic missile submarine, the USS George Washington SSBN 598, in 1960.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) Since 1960, a total of 59 submarines have served the United States to provide the sea-based strategic deterrence.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) As of the date of the enactment of this Act, the sea-based strategic deterrence is provided by the tremendous capability of the 14 ships of the Ohio-class submarine force, which have been the primary sea-based deterrent force for more than two decades.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) Ballistic missile submarines are the most survivable asset in the arsenal of the United States in the event of a surprise nuclear attack on the country because, being submerged for months at a time, these submarines are virtually undetectable to any adversary and therefore invulnerable to attack, thus providing the submarines with the ability to respond with significant force against any adversary who attacks the United States or its allies.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Sense of Congress- It is the sense of Congress that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) as Ohio-class submarines reach the end of their service life and are retired, the United States must maintain the robust sea-based strategic deterrent force that has the ability to remain undetected by potential adversaries and must have the capability to deliver a retaliatory strike of such magnitude that no rational actor would dare attack the United States;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) the Secretary of Defense should conduct a comprehensive analysis of the alternative capabilities to provide the sea-based strategic deterrence that includes consideration of different types and sizes of submarines, different types and sizes of missile systems, the number of submarines necessary to provide such deterrence, and the cost of each alternative; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) prior to requesting more than $1,000,000,000 in research and development funding to develop a replacement for the Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine force in advance of a Milestone A decision, the Secretary of Defense should have made available to Congress the guidance issued by the Director of Cost Assessment and Performance Evaluation with respect to the analysis of alternative capabilities and the results of such analysis.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Limitation-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) REPORT- Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2011 for research and development for the Navy, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended to research or develop a submarine as a replacement for the Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine force unless--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report including--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) guidance issued by the Director of Cost Assessment and Performance Evaluation with respect to the analysis of alternative capabilities to provide the sea-based strategic deterrence currently provided by the Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine force and any other guidance relating to requirements for such alternatives intended to affect the analysis;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) an analysis of the alternative capabilities considered by the Secretary to continue the sea-based strategic deterrence currently provided by the Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine force, including--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(I) the cost estimates for each alternative capability;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(II) the operational challenges and benefits associated with each alternative capability; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(III) the time needed to develop and deploy each alternative capability; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iii) detailed reasoning associated with the decision to replace the capability of sea-based deterrence provided by the Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine force with an alternative capability designed to carry the Trident II D5 missile; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) a period of 30 days has elapsed after the date on which the report under subparagraph (A) is submitted.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) FORM- The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 212. LIMITATION ON OBLIGATION OF FUNDS FOR F-35 LIGHTNING II AIRCRAFT PROGRAM.
Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2011 for research, development, test, and evaluation for the F-35 Lightning II aircraft program, not more than 75 percent may be obligated until the date that is 15 days after the date on which the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics submits to the congressional defense committees certification in writing that all funds made available for fiscal year 2011 for the continued development and procurement of a competitive propulsion system for the F-35 Lightning II aircraft have been obligated.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 213. INCLUSION IN ANNUAL BUDGET REQUEST AND FUTURE-YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM OF SUFFICIENT AMOUNTS FOR CONTINUED DEVELOPMENT AND PROCUREMENT OF COMPETITIVE PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR F-35 LIGHTNING II AIRCRAFT.
(a) Annual Budget- Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘Sec. 236. Budgeting for competitive propulsion system for F-35 Lightning II aircraft
‘(a) Annual Budget- Effective for the budget for fiscal year 2012 and each fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall include in the defense budget materials a request for such amounts as are necessary for the full funding of the continued development and procurement of a competitive propulsion system for the F-35 Lightning II aircraft.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(b) Future-years Defense Program- In each future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of this title, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the estimated expenditures and proposed appropriations for the F-35 Lightning II aircraft, for each fiscal year of the period covered by that program, include sufficient amounts for the full funding of the continued development and procurement of a competitive propulsion system for the F-35 Lightning II aircraft.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(c) Requirement to Obligate and Expend Funds- Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 or any fiscal year thereafter, for research, development, test, and evaluation and procurement for the F-35 Lightning II aircraft program, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure the obligation and expenditure in each such fiscal year of sufficient annual amounts for the continued development and procurement of two options for the propulsion system for the F-35 Lightning II aircraft in order to ensure the development and competitive production for the propulsion system for such aircraft.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(d) Definitions- In this section:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) The term ‘budget’, with respect to a fiscal year, means the budget for that fiscal year that is submitted to Congress by the President under section 1105(a) of title 31.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) The term ‘defense budget materials’, with respect to a fiscal year, means the materials submitted to Congress by the Secretary of Defense in support of the budget for that fiscal year.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by at the end the following new item:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘236. Budgeting for competitive propulsion system for F-35 Lightning II aircraft.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Conforming Repeal- Section 213 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (
) is repealed.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink Public Law 110-181
SEC. 214. SEPARATE PROGRAM ELEMENTS REQUIRED FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE.
In the budget materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to
Subtitle C--Missile Defense ProgramsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Missile Defense ProgramsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 221. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR MISSILE DEFENSES IN EUROPE.
(a) Limitation on Construction and Deployment of Systems- No funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2011 or any fiscal year thereafter may be obligated or expended for site activation, construction, preparation of equipment for, or deployment of a medium-range or long-range missile defense system in Europe until--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) any nation agreeing to host such system has signed and ratified a missile defense basing agreement and a status of forces agreement; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) a period of 45 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees the report on the independent assessment of alternative missile defense systems in Europe required by section 235(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (
(b) Limitation on Procurement or Deployment of Interceptors- No funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2011 or any fiscal year thereafter may be obligated or expended for the procurement (other than initial long-lead procurement) or deployment of operational missiles of a medium-range or long-range missile defense system in Europe until the Secretary of Defense, after receiving the views of the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, submits to the congressional defense committees a report certifying that the proposed interceptor to be deployed as part of such missile defense system has demonstrated, through successful, operationally realistic flight testing, a high probability of working in an operationally effective manner and that such missile defense system has the ability to accomplish the mission.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Conforming Repeal- Section 234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (
SEC. 222. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN CONTRACTS BY MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY WITH FOREIGN ENTITIES.
Section 222 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989 (
SEC. 223. PHASED, ADAPTIVE APPROACH TO MISSILE DEFENSE IN EUROPE.
(a) Sense of Congress- It is the sense of Congress that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) the new phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe, announced by the President on September 17, 2009, should be supported by sound analysis, program plans, schedules, and technologies that are credible;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) the cost, performance, and risk of such approach to missile defense should be well understood; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) Congress should have access to information regarding the analyses, plans, schedules, technologies, cost, performance, and risk of such approach to missile defense in order to conduct effective oversight.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Report Required-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) REPORT- The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) MATTERS INCLUDED- The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) A discussion of the analyses conducted by the Secretary of Defense preceding the announcement of the phased, adaptive Approach to missile defense in Europe on September 17, 2009, including--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) a description of any alternatives considered;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) the criteria used to analyze each such alternative; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iii) the result of each analysis, including a description of the criteria used to judge each alternative.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) A discussion of any independent assessments or reviews of alternative approaches to missile defense in Europe considered by the Secretary in support of the announcement of the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe on September 17, 2009.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) A description of the architecture for each of the four phases of the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe, including--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) the composition, basing locations, and quantities of ballistic missile defense assets, including ships, batteries, interceptors, radars and other sensors, and command and control nodes;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) program schedules and site-specific schedules with task activities, test plans, and knowledge and decision points;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iii) technology maturity levels of missile defense assets and plans for retiring technical risks;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iv) planned performance of missile defense assets and defended area coverage, including sensitivity analysis to various basing scenarios and varying threat capabilities (including simple and complex threats, liquid and solid-fueled ballistic missiles, and varying raid sizes);CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(v) operational concepts and how such operational concepts effect force structure and inventory requirements;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(vi) total cost estimates and funding profiles, by year, for acquisition, fielding, and operations and support; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(vii) acquisition strategies.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) GAO- The Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the report under paragraph (1) pursuant to section 232(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (
(c) Limitation on Funds- Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 301(5) for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, for the Office of the Secretary of Defense, not more than 95 percent of such amounts may be obligated or expended until the date on which the report required under subsection (b)(1) is submitted to the congressional defense committees.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 224. HOMELAND DEFENSE HEDGING POLICY.
(a) Findings- Congress finds the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) As noted by the Director of National Intelligence, testifying before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on February 2, 2010, ‘the Iranian regime continues to flout UN Security Council restrictions on its nuclear program. . .we judge Iran would likely choose missile delivery as its preferred method of delivering a nuclear weapon. Iran already has the largest inventory of ballistic missiles in the Middle East and it continues to expand the scale, reach, and sophistication of its ballistic missile forces--many of which are inherently capable of carrying a nuclear payload.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) The Unclassified Report on Military Power of Iran, dated April 2010, states that, ‘with sufficient foreign assistance, Iran could probably develop and test an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capable of reaching the United States by 2015. Iran could also have an intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM) capable of threatening Europe.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) Under phase 3 of the phased, adaptive approach for missile defense in Europe (scheduled for 2018), the United States plans to deploy the standard missile-3 block IIA interceptor at sea- and land-based sites in addition to existing missile defense systems to provide coverage for all NATO allies in Europe against medium- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) Under phase 4 of the phased, adaptive approach for missile defense in Europe (scheduled for 2020), the United States plans to deploy the standard missile-3 block IIB interceptor to provide additional coverage of the United States against a potential intercontinental ballistic missile launched from the Middle East in the 2020 time frame.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) According to the February 2010 Ballistic Missile Defense Review, the United States will continue the development and assessment of a two-stage ground-based interceptor as part of a hedging strategy and, as further noted by the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy during testimony before the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives on October 1, 2009, ‘we keep the development of the two-stage [ground-based interceptor] on the books as a hedge in case things come earlier, in case there’s any kind of technological challenge with the later models of the [standard missile-3].’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Policy- It shall be the policy of the United States to--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) field missile defense systems in Europe that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) provide protection against medium- and intermediate-range ballistic missile threats consistent with NATO policy and the phased, adapted approach for missile defense announced on September 17, 2009; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) have been confirmed to perform the assigned mission after successful, operationally realistic testing;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) field missile defenses to protect the territory of the United States pursuant to the National Missile Defense Act of 1999 (
(3) ensure that the standard missile-3 block IIA interceptor planned for phase 3 of the phased, adaptive approach for missile defense is capable of addressing intermediate-range ballistic missiles launched from the Middle East and the standard missile-3 block IIB interceptor planned for phase 4 of such approach is capable of addressing intercontinental ballistic missiles launched from the Middle East; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) continue the development and testing of the two-stage ground-based interceptor to maintain it--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) as a means of protection in the event that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) the intermediate-range ballistic missile threat to NATO allies in Europe materializes before the availability of the standard missile-3 block IIA interceptor;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) the intercontinental ballistic missile threat to the United States that cannot be countered with the existing ground-based missile defense system materializes before the availability of the standard missile-3 block IIB interceptor; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iii) technical challenges or schedule delays affect the standard missile-3 block IIA interceptor or the standard missile-3 block IIB interceptor; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) as a complement to the missile defense capabilities deployed in Alaska and California for the defense of the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 225. INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF THE PLAN FOR DEFENSE OF THE HOMELAND AGAINST THE THREAT OF BALLISTIC MISSILES.
(a) Finding- Congress finds that section 2 of the National Missile Defense Act of 1999 (
(b) Assessment- The Secretary of Defense shall contract with an independent entity to conduct an assessment of the plans of the Secretary for defending the territory of the United States against the threat of attack by ballistic missiles, including electromagnetic pulse attacks, as such plans are described in the Ballistic Missile Defense Review submitted to Congress on February 1, 2010, and the report submitted to Congress under section 232 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (
(c) Elements- The assessment required by subsection (b) shall include an assessment of the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) The ballistic missile threat, including electromagnetic pulse attacks, against which the homeland defense elements are intended to defend, including mobile or fixed threats that might arise from non-state actors and accidental or unauthorized launches.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) The military requirements for defending the territory of the United States against such missile threats.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) The capabilities of the missile defense elements available to defend the territory of the United States as of the date of the assessment.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) The planned capabilities of the homeland defense elements, if different from the capabilities under paragraph (3).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) The force structure and inventory levels necessary to achieve the planned capabilities of the elements described in paragraphs (3) and (4).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) The infrastructure necessary to achieve such capabilities, including the number and location of operational silos.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(7) The number of interceptor missiles necessary for operational assets, test assets (including developmental and operational test assets and aging and surveillance test assets), and spare missiles.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Report-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- At or about the same time the budget of the President for fiscal year 2012 is submitted to Congress pursuant to
(2) FORM- The report shall be in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 226. STUDY ON BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE CAPABILITIES OF THE UNITED STATES.
(a) Study- The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall conduct a joint capabilities mix study on the ballistic missile defense capabilities of the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Elements- The study under paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) An assessment of the missile defense capability, force structure, and inventory sufficiency requirements of the combatant commanders based on the threat assessments and operational plans for each combatant command.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) A discussion of the infrastructure necessary to achieve the ballistic missile defense capabilities, force structure, and inventory assessed under paragraph (1).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) An analysis of mobile and fixed missile defense assets.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Report-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- At or about the same time the budget of the President for fiscal year 2012 is submitted to Congress pursuant to
(2) FORM- The report shall be in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 227. REPORTS ON STANDARD MISSILE SYSTEM.
(a) Reports- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and each 180-day period thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the standard missile system, particularly with respect to standard missile-3 block IIA and standard missile-3 block IIB.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Matters Included- The reports under subsection (a) shall include the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) A detailed discussion of the modernization, capabilities, and limitations of the standard missile.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) A review of the standard missile’s comparison capability against all expected threats.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) A report on the progress of complimentary systems, including, at a minimum, radar systems, delivery systems, and recapitalization of supporting software and hardware.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) Any industrial capacities that must be maintained to ensure adequate manufacturing of standard missile technology and production ratio.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle D--ReportsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle D--ReportsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 231. REPORT ON ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES AND PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE GROUND COMBAT VEHICLE PROGRAM.
(a) Report Required- Not later than January 15, 2011, the Secretary of the Army shall provide to the congressional defense committees a report on the Ground Combat Vehicle program of the Army. Such report shall include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) the results of the analysis of alternatives conducted prior to milestone A, including any technical data; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) an explanation of any plans to adjust the requirements of the Ground Combat Vehicle program during the technology development phase of such program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Form- The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Limitation on Obligation of Funds- Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this or any other Act for fiscal year 2011 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Army, for development of the Ground Combat Vehicle, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date that is 30 days after the date on which the report is submitted under subsection (a).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 232. COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TANK-FIRED MUNITIONS.
(a) Cost Benefit Analysis Required-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary of the Army shall conduct a cost benefit analysis of future munitions to be fired from the M1 Abrams series main battle tank to determine the proper investment to be made in tank munitions, including beyond line of sight technology.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) ELEMENTS- The cost benefit analysis under paragraph (1) shall include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) the predicted operational performance of future tank-fired munitions, including those incorporating beyond line of sight technology, based on the relevant modeling and simulation of future combat scenarios of the Army, including a detailed analysis on the suitability of each munition to address the full spectrum of targets across the entire range of the tank (including close range, mid-range, long-range, and beyond line of sight);CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) a detailed assessment of the projected costs to develop and field each tank-fired munition included in the analysis, including those incorporating beyond line of sight technology; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) a comparative analysis of each tank-fired munition included in the analysis, including suitability to address known capability gaps and overmatch against known and projected threats.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) MUNITIONS INCLUDED- In conducting the cost benefit analysis under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall include, at a minimum, the Mid-Range Munition, the Advanced Kinetic Energy round, and the Advanced Multipurpose Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Report- Not later than March 15, 2011, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the cost benefit analysis under subsection (a).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 233. ANNUAL COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON THE VH-(XX) PRESIDENTIAL HELICOPTER ACQUISITION PROGRAM.
(a) Annual GAO Review- During the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on March 1, 2018, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct an annual review of the VH-(XX) aircraft acquisition program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Annual Reports-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- Not later than March 1 of each year beginning in 2011 and ending in 2018, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review of the VH-(XX) aircraft acquisition program conducted under subsection (a).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED- Each report on the review of the VH-(XX) aircraft acquisition program shall include the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) The extent to which the program is meeting development and procurement cost, schedule, performance, and risk mitigation goals.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) With respect to meeting the desired initial operational capability and full operational capability dates for the VH-(XX) aircraft, the progress and results of--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) developmental and operational testing of the aircraft; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) plans for correcting deficiencies in aircraft performance, operational effectiveness, reliability, suitability, and safety.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) An assessment of VH-(XX) aircraft procurement plans, production results, and efforts to improve manufacturing efficiency and supplier performance.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) An assessment of the acquisition strategy of the VH-(XX) aircraft, including whether such strategy is in compliance with acquisition management best-practices and the acquisition policy and regulations of the Department of Defense.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(E) A risk assessment of the integrated master schedule and the test and evaluation master plan of the VH-(XX) aircraft as it relates to--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) the probability of success;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) the funding required for such aircraft compared with the funding programmed; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iii) development and production concurrency.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION- In submitting to the congressional defense committees the first report under paragraph (1) and a report following any changes made by the Secretary of the Navy to the baseline documentation of the VH-(XX) aircraft acquisition program, the Comptroller General shall include, with respect to such program, an assessment of the sufficiency and objectivity of--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) the analysis of alternatives;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) the initial capabilities document;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) the capabilities development document; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) the systems requirement document.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 234. JOINT ASSESSMENT OF THE JOINT EFFECTS TARGETING SYSTEM.
(a) Review- Not later than March 1, 2011, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall form a joint assessment team to review the joint effects targeting system.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Report- Not later than 30 days after the date on which the review under subsection (a) is completed, the Under Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle E--Other MattersCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle E--Other MattersCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 241. ESCALATION OF FORCE CAPABILITIES.
(a) Non-lethal Demonstration Program- The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation and in consultation with the Executive Agent for Non-lethal Weapons, shall carry out a program to operationally test and evaluate non-lethal weapons that provide counter-personnel escalation of force options to members of the Armed Forces deploying in support of a contingency operation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Technology Tested- Technologies evaluated under subsection (a) shall include crowd control, area denial, space clearing, and personnel incapacitation tools.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Report Required- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) evaluates operational and situational suitability for each non-lethal weapon tested;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) defines the tactics, techniques, and procedures approved for deployment of each non-lethal weapon by service;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) identifies deployment schemes for each type of non-lethal weapon by service; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) details, by service, the number of units receiving pre-deployment training on each non-lethal weapon and the total number of units trained.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Procurement Line Item- In the budget materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with submission to Congress, pursuant to
SEC. 242. PILOT PROGRAM TO INCLUDE TECHNOLOGY PROTECTION FEATURES DURING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF DEFENSE SYSTEMS.
(a) Pilot Program- The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program to develop and incorporate technology protection features in a designated system during the research and development phase of such system.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Funding- Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, not more than $5,000,000 may be available to carry out this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Annual Reports- Not later than December 31 of each year in which the Secretary carries out the pilot program, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program established under this section, including a list of each designated system included in the program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Termination- The pilot program established under this section shall terminate on October 1, 2015.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(e) Definitions- In this section:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) The term ‘designated system’ means any system (including a major system, as defined in
(2) The term ‘technology protection features’ means the technical modifications necessary to protect critical program information, including anti-tamper technologies and other systems engineering activities intended to prevent or delay exploitation of critical technologies in a designated system.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 243. PILOT PROGRAM ON COLLABORATIVE ENERGY SECURITY.
(a) Pilot Program- The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Energy, shall carry out a collaborative energy security pilot program involving one or more partnerships between one military installation and one national laboratory, for the purpose of evaluating and validating secure, salable microgrid components and systems for deployment.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Selection of Military Installation and National Laboratory- The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy shall jointly select a military installation and a national laboratory for the purpose of carrying out the pilot program under this section. In making such selections, the Secretaries shall consider each of the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) A commitment to participate made by a military installation being considered for selection.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) The findings and recommendations of relevant energy security assessments of military installations being considered for selection.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) The availability of renewable energy sources at a military installation being considered for selection.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) Potential synergies between the expertise and capabilities of a national laboratory being considered for selection and the infrastructure, interests, or other energy security needs of a military installation being considered for selection.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) The effects of any utility tariffs, surcharges, or other considerations on the feasibility of enabling any excess electricity generated on a military installation being considered for selection to be sold or otherwise made available to the local community near the installation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Program Elements- The pilot program shall be carried out as follows:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) Under the pilot program, the Secretaries shall evaluate and validate the performance of new energy technologies that may be incorporated into operating environments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) The pilot program shall involve collaboration with the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability of the Department of Energy and other offices and agencies within the Department of Energy, as appropriate, and the Environmental Security Technical Certification Program of the Department of Defense.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) Under the pilot program, the Secretary of Defense shall investigate opportunities for any excess electricity created for the military installation to be sold or otherwise made available to the local community near the installation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) The Secretary of Defense shall use the results of the pilot program as the basis for informing key performance parameters and validating energy components and designs that could be implemented in various military installations across the country and at forward operating bases.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) The pilot program shall support the effort of the Secretary of Defense to use the military as a test bed to demonstrate innovative energy technologies.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Implementation and Duration- The Secretary of Defense shall begin the pilot program under this section by not later than July 1, 2011. Such pilot program shall be not less than 3 years in duration.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(e) Reports-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) INITIAL REPORT- Not later than October 1, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees an initial report that provides an update on the implementation of the pilot program under this section, including an identification of the selected military installation and national laboratory partner and a description of technologies under evaluation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink