U.S. Congress - Text of H.R.5325 as Introduced in House America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010
The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowH.R.5325 - America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010
To invest in innovation through research and development, to improve the competitiveness of the United States, and for other purposes.
Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HR 5325 IHCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
111th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
2d SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
H. R. 5325CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To invest in innovation through research and development, to improve the competitiveness of the United States, and for other purposes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
May 18, 2010CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
May 18, 2010CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Mr. GORDON of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science and Technology, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Labor and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concernedCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To invest in innovation through research and development, to improve the competitiveness of the United States, and for other purposes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.
(a) Short Title- This Act may be cited as the ‘America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Table of Contents- The table of contents for this Act is as follows:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE I--SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Subtitle A--National Nanotechnology Initiative Amendments
Sec. 101. Short title.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 102. National nanotechnology program amendments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 103. Societal dimensions of nanotechnology.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 104. Technology transfer.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 105. Research in areas of national importance.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 106. Nanomanufacturing research.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 107. Definitions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Networking and Information Technology Research and Development
Sec. 111. Short title.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 112. Program planning and coordination.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 113. Large-scale research in areas of national importance.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 114. Cyber-physical systems and information management.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 115. National Coordination Office.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 116. Improving networking and information technology education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 117. Conforming and technical amendments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Other OSTP Provisions
Sec. 121. Federal scientific collections.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 122. Coordination of manufacturing research and development.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 123. Interagency public access committee.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 124. Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 125. National Competitiveness and Innovation Strategy.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE II--NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Sec. 201. Short title.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle A--General Provisions
Sec. 211. Definitions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 212. Authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 213. National Science Board administrative amendments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 214. Broader impacts review criterion.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 215. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 216. Collection of data on demographics of faculty.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Research and Innovation
Sec. 221. Support for potentially transformative research.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 222. Facilitating interdisciplinary collaborations for national needs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 223. National Science Foundation manufacturing research and education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 224. Strengthening institutional research partnerships.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 225. National Science Board report on mid-scale instrumentation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 226. Sense of Congress on overall support for research infrastructure at the Foundation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 227. Partnerships for innovation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 228. Prize awards.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 229. Green chemistry basic research.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 230. Collaboration in planning for stewardship of large-scale facilities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--STEM Education and Workforce Training
Sec. 241. Graduate student support.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 242. Postdoctoral fellowship in STEM education research.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 243. Robert Noyce teacher scholarship program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 244. Institutions serving persons with disabilities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 245. Institutional integration.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 246. Postdoctoral research fellowships.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 247. Broadening participation training and outreach.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 248. Transforming undergraduate education in STEM.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 249. 21st century graduate education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 250. Undergraduate broadening participation program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 251. Grand challenges in education research.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 252. Research experiences for undergraduates.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 253. Laboratory science pilot program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 254. STEM industry internship programs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 255. Tribal colleges and universities program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 256. Cyber-enabled learning for national challenges.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 257. Sense of Congress.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE III--STEM EDUCATION
Sec. 301. Coordination of Federal STEM education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 302. Advisory committee on STEM education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 303. STEM education at the Department of Energy.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 304. Green energy education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 305. National Academy of Sciences report on strengthening the capacity of 2-year institutions of higher education to provide STEM opportunities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 306. Sense of Congress on engineering education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 307. Sense of Congress on grant application consideration.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 308. Encouraging Federal scientists and engineers to participate in STEM education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE IV--NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY
Sec. 401. Short title.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 402. Authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 403. Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 404. Reorganization of NIST laboratories.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 405. Federal Government standards and conformity assessment coordination.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 406. Manufacturing extension partnership.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 407. Emergency communication and tracking technologies research initiative.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 408. TIP Advisory Board.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 409. Underrepresented minorities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 410. Cyber security standards and guidelines.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 411. Disaster resilient buildings and infrastructure.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 412. Definitions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 413. Report on the use of modeling and simulation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 414. Green manufacturing and construction.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 415. Nanomaterial initiative.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 416. Manufacturing research.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE V--INNOVATION
Sec. 501. Office of Innovation and Entrepreneurship.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 502. Federal loan guarantees for innovative technologies in manufacturing.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 503. Regional innovation program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 504. Clean Energy Consortium.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE VI--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Subtitle A--Office of Science
Sec. 601. Short title.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 602. Definitions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 603. Mission of the Office of Science.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 604. Basic Energy Sciences Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 605. Biological and Environmental Research Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 606. Advanced Scientific Computing Research Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 607. Fusion energy research program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 608. High Energy Physics Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 609. Nuclear Physics Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 610. Science Laboratories Infrastructure Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 611. Authorization of appropriations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Advanced Research Projects Agency--Energy
Sec. 621. Short title.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 622. ARPA-E amendments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Energy Innovation Hubs
Sec. 631. Short title.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 632. Energy Innovation Hubs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle D--Cooperative Research and Development Fund
Sec. 641. Short title.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 642. Cooperative research and development fund.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle E--Technology Transfer Database
Sec. 651. Technology transfer database.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE VII--MISCELLANEOUS
Sec. 701. Sense of Congress.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 702. Persons with disabilities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 703. Veterans and service members.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 704. Budgetary effects.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 705. Limitation on employment and receipt of funds.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 706. Prohibition on lobbying.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 707. Information requests by labor organizations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 708. Limitation on use of funds.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Sec. 709. No salaries for viewing pornography.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE I--SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICYCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE I--SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICYCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle A--National Nanotechnology Initiative AmendmentsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle A--National Nanotechnology Initiative AmendmentsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 101. SHORT TITLE.
This subtitle may be cited as the ‘National Nanotechnology Initiative Amendments Act of 2010’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 102. NATIONAL NANOTECHNOLOGY PROGRAM AMENDMENTS.
The 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (
(1) by striking section 2(c)(4) and inserting the following new paragraph:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(4) develop, within 12 months after the date of enactment of the National Nanotechnology Initiative Amendments Act of 2010, and update every 3 years thereafter, a strategic plan to guide the activities described under subsection (b) that specifies near-term and long-term objectives for the Program, the anticipated time frame for achieving the near-term objectives, and the metrics to be used for assessing progress toward the objectives, and that describes--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(A) how the Program will move results out of the laboratory and into applications for the benefit of society, including through cooperation and collaborations with nanotechnology research, development, and technology transition initiatives supported by the States;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(B) how the Program will encourage and support interdisciplinary research and development in nanotechnology; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(C) proposed research in areas of national importance in accordance with the requirements of section 105 of the National Nanotechnology Initiative Amendments Act of 2010;’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in section 2--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) in subsection (d)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (5) as paragraphs (2) through (6), respectively; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) by inserting the following new paragraph before paragraph (2), as so redesignated by clause (i) of this subparagraph:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) the Program budget, for the previous fiscal year, for each agency that participates in the Program, including a breakout of spending for the development and acquisition of research facilities and instrumentation, for each program component area, and for all activities pursuant to subsection (b)(10);’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) by inserting at the end the following new subsection:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(e) Standards Setting- The agencies participating in the Program shall support the activities of committees involved in the development of standards for nanotechnology and may reimburse the travel costs of scientists and engineers who participate in activities of such committees.’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) by striking section 3(b) and inserting the following new subsection:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(b) Funding- (1) The operation of the National Nanotechnology Coordination Office shall be supported by funds from each agency participating in the Program. The portion of such Office’s total budget provided by each agency for each fiscal year shall be in the same proportion as the agency’s share of the total budget for the Program for the previous fiscal year, as specified in the report required under section 2(d)(1).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) The annual report under section 2(d) shall include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(A) a description of the funding required by the National Nanotechnology Coordination Office to perform the functions specified under subsection (a) for the next fiscal year by category of activity, including the funding required to carry out the requirements of section 2(b)(10)(D), subsection (d) of this section, and section 5;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(B) a description of the funding required by such Office to perform the functions specified under subsection (a) for the current fiscal year by category of activity, including the funding required to carry out the requirements of subsection (d); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(C) the amount of funding provided for such Office for the current fiscal year by each agency participating in the Program.’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) by inserting at the end of section 3 the following new subsection:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(d) Public Information- (1) The National Nanotechnology Coordination Office shall develop and maintain a database accessible by the public of projects funded under the Environmental, Health, and Safety, the Education and Societal Dimensions, and the Nanomanufacturing program component areas, or any successor program component areas, including a description of each project, its source of funding by agency, and its funding history. For the Environmental, Health, and Safety program component area, or any successor program component area, projects shall be grouped by major objective as defined by the research plan required under section 103(b) of the National Nanotechnology Initiative Amendments Act of 2010. For the Education and Societal Dimensions program component area, or any successor program component area, the projects shall be grouped in subcategories of--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(A) education in formal settings;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(B) education in informal settings;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(C) public outreach; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(D) ethical, legal, and other societal issues.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) The National Nanotechnology Coordination Office shall develop, maintain, and publicize information on nanotechnology facilities supported under the Program, and may include information on nanotechnology facilities supported by the States, that are accessible for use by individuals from academic institutions and from industry. The information shall include at a minimum the terms and conditions for the use of each facility, a description of the capabilities of the instruments and equipment available for use at the facility, and a description of the technical support available to assist users of the facility.’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) in section 4(a)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) by striking ‘or designate’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) by inserting ‘as a distinct entity’ after ‘Advisory Panel’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) by inserting at the end ‘The Advisory Panel shall form a subpanel with membership having specific qualifications tailored to enable it to carry out the requirements of subsection (c)(7).’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) in section 4(b)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) by striking ‘or designated’ and ‘or designating’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) by adding at the end the following: ‘At least one member of the Advisory Panel shall be an individual employed by and representing a minority-serving institution.’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(7) by amending section 5 to read as follows:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘SEC. 5. TRIENNIAL EXTERNAL REVIEW OF THE NATIONAL NANOTECHNOLOGY PROGRAM.
‘(a) In General- The Director of the National Nanotechnology Coordination Office shall enter into an arrangement with the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a triennial review of the Program. The Director shall ensure that the arrangement with the National Research Council is concluded in order to allow sufficient time for the reporting requirements of subsection (b) to be satisfied. Each triennial review shall include an evaluation of the--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) research priorities and technical content of the Program, including whether the allocation of funding among program component areas, as designated according to section 2(c)(2), is appropriate;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) effectiveness of the Program’s management and coordination across agencies and disciplines, including an assessment of the effectiveness of the National Nanotechnology Coordination Office;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(3) Program’s scientific and technological accomplishments and its success in transferring technology to the private sector; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(4) adequacy of the Program’s activities addressing ethical, legal, environmental, and other appropriate societal concerns, including human health concerns.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(b) Evaluation To Be Transmitted to Congress- The National Research Council shall document the results of each triennial review carried out in accordance with subsection (a) in a report that includes any recommendations for ways to improve the Program’s management and coordination processes and for changes to the Program’s objectives, funding priorities, and technical content. Each report shall be submitted to the Director of the National Nanotechnology Coordination Office, who shall transmit it to the Advisory Panel, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives not later than September 30 of every third year, with the first report due September 30, 2010.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(c) Funding- Of the amounts provided in accordance with section 3(b)(1), the following amounts shall be available to carry out this section:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) $500,000 for fiscal year 2010.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) $500,000 for fiscal year 2011.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(3) $500,000 for fiscal year 2012.’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(8) in section 10--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) NANOTECHNOLOGY- The term ‘nanotechnology’ means the science and technology that will enable one to understand, measure, manipulate, and manufacture at the nanoscale, aimed at creating materials, devices, and systems with fundamentally new properties or functions.’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(7) NANOSCALE- The term ‘nanoscale’ means one or more dimensions of between approximately 1 and 100 nanometers.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 103. SOCIETAL DIMENSIONS OF NANOTECHNOLOGY.
(a) Coordinator for Societal Dimensions of Nanotechnology- The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall designate an associate director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy as the Coordinator for Societal Dimensions of Nanotechnology. The Coordinator shall be responsible for oversight of the coordination, planning, and budget prioritization of activities required by section 2(b)(10) of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (
(1) ensuring that a research plan for the environmental, health, and safety research activities required under subsection (b) is developed, updated, and implemented and that the plan is responsive to the recommendations of the subpanel of the Advisory Panel established under section 4(a) of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (
(2) encouraging and monitoring the efforts of the agencies participating in the Program to allocate the level of resources and management attention necessary to ensure that the ethical, legal, environmental, and other appropriate societal concerns related to nanotechnology, including human health concerns, are addressed under the Program, including the implementation of the research plan described in subsection (b); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) encouraging the agencies required to develop the research plan under subsection (b) to identify, assess, and implement suitable mechanisms for the establishment of public-private partnerships for support of environmental, health, and safety research.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Research Plan-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- The Coordinator for Societal Dimensions of Nanotechnology shall convene and chair a panel comprised of representatives from the agencies funding research activities under the Environmental, Health, and Safety program component area of the Program, or any successor program component area, and from such other agencies as the Coordinator considers necessary to develop, periodically update, and coordinate the implementation of a research plan for this program component area. In developing and updating the plan, the panel convened by the Coordinator shall solicit and be responsive to recommendations and advice from--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) the subpanel of the Advisory Panel established under section 4(a) of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (
(B) the agencies responsible for environmental, health, and safety regulations associated with the production, use, and disposal of nanoscale materials and products.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) DEVELOPMENT OF STANDARDS- The plan required under paragraph (1) shall include a description of how the Program will help to ensure the development of--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) standards related to nomenclature associated with engineered nanoscale materials;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) engineered nanoscale standard reference materials for environmental, health, and safety testing; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) standards related to methods and procedures for detecting, measuring, monitoring, sampling, and testing engineered nanoscale materials for environmental, health, and safety impacts.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) COMPONENTS OF PLAN- The plan required under paragraph (1) shall, with respect to activities described in paragraphs (1) and (2)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) specify near-term research objectives and long-term research objectives;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) specify milestones associated with each near-term objective and the estimated time and resources required to reach each milestone;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) with respect to subparagraphs (A) and (B), describe the role of each agency carrying out or sponsoring research in order to meet the objectives specified under subparagraph (A) and to achieve the milestones specified under subparagraph (B);CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) specify the funding allocated to each major objective of the plan and the source of funding by agency for the current fiscal year; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(E) estimate the funding required for each major objective of the plan and the source of funding by agency for the following 3 fiscal years.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) TRANSMITTAL TO CONGRESS- The plan required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) UPDATING AND APPENDING TO REPORT- The plan required under paragraph (1) shall be updated annually and appended to the report required under section 2(d) of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (
(c) Nanotechnology Partnerships-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) ESTABLISHMENT- As part of the program authorized by section 9 of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2002, the Director of the National Science Foundation shall provide 1 or more grants to establish partnerships as defined by subsection (a)(2) of that section, except that each such partnership shall include 1 or more businesses engaged in the production of nanoscale materials, products, or devices. Partnerships established in accordance with this subsection shall be designated as ‘Nanotechnology Education Partnerships’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) PURPOSE- Nanotechnology Education Partnerships shall be designed to recruit and help prepare secondary school students to pursue postsecondary level courses of instruction in nanotechnology. At a minimum, grants shall be used to support--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) professional development activities to enable secondary school teachers to use curricular materials incorporating nanotechnology and to inform teachers about career possibilities for students in nanotechnology;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) enrichment programs for students, including access to nanotechnology facilities and equipment at partner institutions, to increase their understanding of nanoscale science and technology and to inform them about career possibilities in nanotechnology as scientists, engineers, and technicians; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) identification of appropriate nanotechnology educational materials and incorporation of nanotechnology into the curriculum for secondary school students at one or more organizations participating in a Partnership.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) SELECTION- Grants under this subsection shall be awarded in accordance with subsection (b) of such section 9, except that paragraph (3)(B) of that subsection shall not apply.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Undergraduate Education Programs-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) ACTIVITIES SUPPORTED- As part of the activities included under the Education and Societal Dimensions program component area, or any successor program component area, the Program shall support efforts to introduce nanoscale science, engineering, and technology into undergraduate science and engineering education through a variety of interdisciplinary approaches. Activities supported may include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) development of courses of instruction or modules to existing courses;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) faculty professional development; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) acquisition of equipment and instrumentation suitable for undergraduate education and research in nanotechnology.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) COURSE, CURRICULUM, AND LABORATORY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORIZATION- There are authorized to be appropriated to the Director of the National Science Foundation to carry out activities described in paragraph (1) through the Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement program from amounts authorized under section 7002(c)(2)(B) of the America COMPETES Act, $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2010.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION AUTHORIZATION- There are authorized to be appropriated to the Director of the National Science Foundation to carry out activities described in paragraph (1) through the Advanced Technology Education program from amounts authorized under section 7002(c)(2)(B) of the America COMPETES Act, $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2010.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(e) Interagency Working Group- The National Science and Technology Council shall establish under the Nanoscale Science, Engineering, and Technology Subcommittee an Education Working Group to coordinate, prioritize, and plan the educational activities supported under the Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(f) Societal Dimensions in Nanotechnology Education Activities- Activities supported under the Education and Societal Dimensions program component area, or any successor program component area, that involve informal, precollege, or undergraduate nanotechnology education shall include education regarding the environmental, health and safety, and other societal aspects of nanotechnology.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(g) Remote Access to Nanotechnology Facilities- (1) Agencies supporting nanotechnology research facilities as part of the Program shall require the entities that operate such facilities to allow access via the Internet, and support the costs associated with the provision of such access, by secondary school students and teachers, to instruments and equipment within such facilities for educational purposes. The agencies may waive this requirement for cases when particular facilities would be inappropriate for educational purposes or the costs for providing such access would be prohibitive.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) The agencies identified in paragraph (1) shall require the entities that operate such nanotechnology research facilities to establish and publish procedures, guidelines, and conditions for the submission and approval of applications for the use of the facilities for the purpose identified in paragraph (1) and shall authorize personnel who operate the facilities to provide necessary technical support to students and teachers.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 104. TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER.
(a) Prototyping-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) ACCESS TO FACILITIES- In accordance with section 2(b)(7) of 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (
(2) PROCEDURES- The agencies identified in paragraph (1)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) shall establish and publish procedures, guidelines, and conditions for the submission and approval of applications for use of nanotechnology facilities;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) shall publish descriptions of the capabilities of facilities available for use under this subsection, including the availability of technical support; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) may waive recovery, require full recovery, or require partial recovery of the costs associated with use of the facilities for projects under this subsection.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) SELECTION AND CRITERIA- In cases when less than full cost recovery is required pursuant to paragraph (2)(C), projects provided access to nanotechnology facilities in accordance with this subsection shall be selected through a competitive, merit-based process, and the criteria for the selection of such projects shall include at a minimum--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) the readiness of the project for technology demonstration;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) evidence of a commitment by the applicant for further development of the project to full commercialization if the proof of concept is established by the prototype; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) evidence of the potential for further funding from private sector sources following the successful demonstration of proof of concept.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
The agencies may give special consideration in selecting projects to applications that are relevant to important national needs or requirements.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Use of Existing Technology Transfer Programs-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) PARTICIPATING AGENCIES- Each agency participating in the Program shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) encourage the submission of applications for support of nanotechnology related projects to the Small Business Innovation Research Program and the Small Business Technology Transfer Program administered by such agencies; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) through the National Nanotechnology Coordination Office and within 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) the plan described in section 2(c)(7) of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (
(ii) a report specifying, if the agency administers a Small Business Innovation Research Program and a Small Business Technology Transfer Program--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(I) the number of proposals received for nanotechnology related projects during the current fiscal year and the previous 2 fiscal years;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(II) the number of such proposals funded in each year;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(III) the total number of nanotechnology related projects funded and the amount of funding provided for fiscal year 2004 through fiscal year 2008; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(IV) a description of the projects identified in accordance with subclause (III) which received private sector funding beyond the period of phase II support.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY- The Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology in carrying out the requirements of section 28 of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act (
(A) in regard to subsection (d) of that section, encourage the submission of proposals for support of nanotechnology related projects; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) in regard to subsection (g) of that section, include a description of how the requirement of subparagraph (A) of this paragraph is being met, the number of proposals for nanotechnology related projects received, the number of such proposals funded, the total number of such projects funded since the beginning of the Technology Innovation Program, and the outcomes of such funded projects in terms of the metrics developed in accordance with such subsection (g).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) TIP ADVISORY BOARD- The TIP Advisory Board established under section 28(k) of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act (
(A) advice on how to accomplish the requirement of paragraph (2)(A) of this subsection; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) an assessment of the adequacy of the allocation of resources for nanotechnology related projects supported under the Technology Innovation Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Industry Liaison Groups- An objective of the Program shall be to establish industry liaison groups for all industry sectors that would benefit from applications of nanotechnology. The Nanomanufacturing, Industry Liaison, and Innovation Working Group of the National Science and Technology Council shall actively pursue establishing such liaison groups.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Coordination With State Initiatives- Section 2(b)(5) of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (
‘(5) ensuring United States global leadership in the development and application of nanotechnology, including through coordination and leveraging Federal investments with nanotechnology research, development, and technology transition initiatives supported by the States;’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 105. RESEARCH IN AREAS OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE.
(a) In General- The Program shall include support for nanotechnology research and development activities directed toward application areas that have the potential for significant contributions to national economic competitiveness and for other significant societal benefits. The activities supported shall be designed to advance the development of research discoveries by demonstrating technical solutions to important problems in such areas as nano-electronics, energy efficiency, health care, and water remediation and purification. The Advisory Panel shall make recommendations to the Program for candidate research and development areas for support under this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Characteristics-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- Research and development activities under this section shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) include projects selected on the basis of applications for support through a competitive, merit-based process;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) involve collaborations among researchers in academic institutions and industry, and may involve nonprofit research institutions and Federal laboratories, as appropriate;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) when possible, leverage Federal investments through collaboration with related State initiatives; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) include a plan for fostering the transfer of research discoveries and the results of technology demonstration activities to industry for commercial development.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) PROCEDURES- Determination of the requirements for applications under this subsection, review and selection of applications for support, and subsequent funding of projects shall be carried out by a collaboration of no fewer than 2 agencies participating in the Program. In selecting applications for support, the agencies shall give special consideration to projects that include cost sharing from non-Federal sources.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH CENTERS- Research and development activities under this section may be supported through interdisciplinary nanotechnology research centers, as authorized by section 2(b)(4) of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (
(c) Report- Reports required under section 2(d) of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (
SEC. 106. NANOMANUFACTURING RESEARCH.
(a) Research Areas- The Nanomanufacturing program component area, or any successor program component area, shall include research on--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) development of instrumentation and tools required for the rapid characterization of nanoscale materials and for monitoring of nanoscale manufacturing processes; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) approaches and techniques for scaling the synthesis of new nanoscale materials to achieve industrial-level production rates.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Green Nanotechnology- Interdisciplinary research centers supported under the Program in accordance with section 2(b)(4) of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (
(1) research on methods and approaches to develop environmentally benign nanoscale products and nanoscale manufacturing processes, taking into consideration relevant findings and results of research supported under the Environmental, Health, and Safety program component area, or any successor program component area;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) fostering the transfer of the results of such research to industry; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) providing for the education of scientists and engineers through interdisciplinary studies in the principles and techniques for the design and development of environmentally benign nanoscale products and processes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Review of Nanomanufacturing Research and Research Facilities-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) PUBLIC MEETING- Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the National Nanotechnology Coordination Office shall sponsor a public meeting, including representation from a wide range of industries engaged in nanoscale manufacturing, to--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) obtain the views of participants at the meeting on--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) the relevance and value of the research being carried out under the Nanomanufacturing program component area of the Program, or any successor program component area; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) whether the capabilities of nanotechnology research facilities supported under the Program are adequate--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(I) to meet current and near-term requirements for the fabrication and characterization of nanoscale devices and systems; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(II) to provide access to and use of instrumentation and equipment at the facilities, by means of networking technology, to individuals who are at locations remote from the facilities; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) receive any recommendations on ways to strengthen the research portfolio supported under the Nanomanufacturing program component area, or any successor program component area, and on improving the capabilities of nanotechnology research facilities supported under the Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Companies participating in industry liaison groups shall be invited to participate in the meeting. The Coordination Office shall prepare a report documenting the findings and recommendations resulting from the meeting.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) ADVISORY PANEL REVIEW- The Advisory Panel shall review the Nanomanufacturing program component area of the Program, or any successor program component area, and the capabilities of nanotechnology research facilities supported under the Program to assess--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) whether the funding for the Nanomanufacturing program component area, or any successor program component area, is adequate and receiving appropriate priority within the overall resources available for the Program;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) the relevance of the research being supported to the identified needs and requirements of industry;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) whether the capabilities of nanotechnology research facilities supported under the Program are adequate--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) to meet current and near-term requirements for the fabrication and characterization of nanoscale devices and systems; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) to provide access to and use of instrumentation and equipment at the facilities, by means of networking technology, to individuals who are at locations remote from the facilities; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) the level of funding that would be needed to support--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) the acquisition of instrumentation, equipment, and networking technology sufficient to provide the capabilities at nanotechnology research facilities described in subparagraph (C); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) the operation and maintenance of such facilities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
In carrying out its assessment, the Advisory Panel shall take into consideration the findings and recommendations from the report required under paragraph (1).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) REPORT- Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Advisory Panel shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives a report on its assessment required under paragraph (2), along with any recommendations and a copy of the report prepared in accordance with paragraph (1).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 107. DEFINITIONS.
In this subtitle, terms that are defined in section 10 of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (
Subtitle B--Networking and Information Technology Research and DevelopmentCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Networking and Information Technology Research and DevelopmentCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 111. SHORT TITLE.
This subtitle may be cited as the ‘Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Act of 2010’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 112. PROGRAM PLANNING AND COORDINATION.
(a) Periodic Reviews- Section 101 of the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 (
‘(d) Periodic Reviews- The agencies identified in subsection (a)(3)(B) shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) periodically assess the contents and funding levels of the Program Component Areas and restructure the Program when warranted, taking into consideration any relevant recommendations of the advisory committee established under subsection (b); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) ensure that the Program includes large-scale, long-term, interdisciplinary research and development activities, including activities described in section 104.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Development of Strategic Plan- Section 101 of such Act (
‘(e) Strategic Plan-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) IN GENERAL- The agencies identified in subsection (a)(3)(B), working through the National Science and Technology Council and with the assistance of the National Coordination Office established under section 102, shall develop, within 12 months after the date of enactment of the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Act of 2010, and update every 3 years thereafter, a 5-year strategic plan to guide the activities described under subsection (a)(1).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) CONTENTS- The strategic plan shall specify near-term and long-term objectives for the Program, the anticipated time frame for achieving the near-term objectives, the metrics to be used for assessing progress toward the objectives, and how the Program will--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(A) foster the transfer of research and development results into new technologies and applications for the benefit of society, including through cooperation and collaborations with networking and information technology research, development, and technology transition initiatives supported by the States;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(B) encourage and support mechanisms for interdisciplinary research and development in networking and information technology, including through collaborations across agencies, across Program Component Areas, with industry, with Federal laboratories (as defined in section 4 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (
15 U.S.C. 3703 )), and with international organizations;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink‘(C) address long-term challenges of national importance for which solutions require large-scale, long-term, interdisciplinary research and development;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(D) place emphasis on innovative and high-risk projects having the potential for substantial societal returns on the research investment;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(E) strengthen all levels of networking and information technology education and training programs to ensure an adequate, well-trained workforce; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(F) attract more women and underrepresented minorities to pursue postsecondary degrees in networking and information technology.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(3) National Research Infrastructure- The strategic plan developed in accordance with paragraph (1) shall be accompanied by milestones and roadmaps for establishing and maintaining the national research infrastructure required to support the Program, including the roadmap required by subsection (a)(2)(E).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(4) Recommendations- The entities involved in developing the strategic plan under paragraph (1) shall take into consideration the recommendations--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(A) of the advisory committee established under subsection (b); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(B) of the stakeholders whose input was solicited by the National Coordination Office, as required under section 102(b)(3).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(5) Report to Congress- The Director of the National Coordination Office shall transmit the strategic plan required under paragraph (1) to the advisory committee, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Additional Responsibilities of Director- Section 101(a)(2) of such Act (
(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (E) and (F) as subparagraphs (F) and (G), respectively; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following new subparagraph:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(E) encourage and monitor the efforts of the agencies participating in the Program to allocate the level of resources and management attention necessary to ensure that the strategic plan under subsection (e) is developed and executed effectively and that the objectives of the Program are met;’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Advisory Committee- Section 101(b)(1) of such Act (
(e) Report- Section 101(a)(3) of such Act (
(1) in subparagraph (C)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) by striking ‘is submitted,’ and inserting ‘is submitted, the levels for the previous fiscal year,’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) by striking ‘each Program Component Area;’ and inserting ‘each Program Component Area and research area supported in accordance with section 104;’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in subparagraph (D)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) by striking ‘each Program Component Area,’ and inserting ‘each Program Component Area and research area supported in accordance with section 104,’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) by striking ‘is submitted,’ and inserting ‘is submitted, the levels for the previous fiscal year,’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) by striking ‘and’ after the semicolon;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (G); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following new subparagraphs:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(E) include a description of how the objectives for each Program Component Area, and the objectives for activities that involve multiple Program Component Areas, relate to the objectives of the Program identified in the strategic plan required under subsection (e);CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(F) include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(i) a description of the funding required by the National Coordination Office to perform the functions specified under section 102(b) for the next fiscal year by category of activity;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(ii) a description of the funding required by such Office to perform the functions specified under section 102(b) for the current fiscal year by category of activity; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(iii) the amount of funding provided for such Office for the current fiscal year by each agency participating in the Program; and’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(f) Definition- Section 4 of such Act (
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (7) as paragraphs (2) through (8), respectively;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) by inserting before paragraph (2), as so redesignated, the following new paragraph:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) ‘cyber-physical systems’ means physical or engineered systems whose networking and information technology functions and physical elements are deeply integrated and are actively connected to the physical world through sensors, actuators, or other means to perform monitoring and control functions;’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) in paragraph (4), as so redesignated--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) by striking ‘high-performance computing’ and inserting ‘networking and information technology’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) by striking ‘supercomputer’ and inserting ‘high-end computing’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) in paragraph (6), as so redesignated, by striking ‘network referred to as’ and all that follows through the semicolon and inserting ‘network, including advanced computer networks of Federal agencies and departments;’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) in paragraph (7), as so redesignated, by striking ‘National High-Performance Computing Program’ and inserting ‘networking and information technology research and development program’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 113. LARGE-SCALE RESEARCH IN AREAS OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE.
Title I of such Act (
‘SEC. 104. LARGE-SCALE RESEARCH IN AREAS OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE.
‘(a) In General- The Program shall encourage agencies identified in section 101(a)(3)(B) to support large-scale, long-term, interdisciplinary research and development activities in networking and information technology directed toward application areas that have the potential for significant contributions to national economic competitiveness and for other significant societal benefits. Such activities, ranging from basic research to the demonstration of technical solutions, shall be designed to advance the development of research discoveries. The advisory committee established under section 101(b) shall make recommendations to the Program for candidate research and development areas for support under this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(b) Characteristics-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) IN GENERAL- Research and development activities under this section shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(A) include projects selected on the basis of applications for support through a competitive, merit-based process;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(B) involve collaborations among researchers in institutions of higher education and industry, and may involve nonprofit research institutions and Federal laboratories, as appropriate;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(C) when possible, leverage Federal investments through collaboration with related State initiatives; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(D) include a plan for fostering the transfer of research discoveries and the results of technology demonstration activities, including from institutions of higher education and Federal laboratories, to industry for commercial development.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) COST-SHARING- In selecting applications for support, the agencies shall give special consideration to projects that include cost sharing from non-Federal sources.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(3) AGENCY COLLABORATION- If 2 or more agencies identified in section 101(a)(3)(B), or other appropriate agencies, are working on large-scale research and development activities in the same area of national importance, then such agencies shall strive to collaborate through joint solicitation and selection of applications for support and subsequent funding of projects.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(4) INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH CENTERS- Research and development activities under this section may be supported through interdisciplinary research centers that are organized to investigate basic research questions and carry out technology demonstration activities in areas described in subsection (a). Research may be carried out through existing interdisciplinary centers, including those authorized under section 7024(b)(2) of the America COMPETES Act (
Public Law 110-69 ;42 U.S.C. 1862o-10 ).’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 114. CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT.
(a) Additional Program Characteristics- Section 101(a)(1) of such Act (
(1) in subparagraph (H), by striking ‘and’ after the semicolon;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in subparagraph (I), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(J) provide for increased understanding of the scientific principles of cyber-physical systems and improve the methods available for the design, development, and operation of cyber-physical systems that are characterized by high reliability, safety, and security; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(K) provide for research and development on human-computer interactions, visualization, and information management.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Task Force- Title I of such Act (
‘SEC. 105. UNIVERSITY/INDUSTRY TASK FORCE.
‘(a) Establishment- Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Act of 2010, the Director of the National Coordination Office established under section 102 shall convene a task force to explore mechanisms for carrying out collaborative research and development activities for cyber-physical systems, including the related technologies required to enable these systems, through a consortium or other appropriate entity with participants from institutions of higher education, Federal laboratories, and industry.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(b) Functions- The task force shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) develop options for a collaborative model and an organizational structure for such entity under which the joint research and development activities could be planned, managed, and conducted effectively, including mechanisms for the allocation of resources among the participants in such entity for support of such activities;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) propose a process for developing a research and development agenda for such entity, including objectives and milestones;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(3) define the roles and responsibilities for the participants from institutions of higher education, Federal laboratories, and industry in such entity;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(4) propose guidelines for assigning intellectual property rights and for the transfer of research results to the private sector; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(5) make recommendations for how such entity could be funded from Federal, State, and non-governmental sources.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(c) Composition- In establishing the task force under subsection (a), the Director of the National Coordination Office shall appoint an equal number of individuals from institutions of higher education and from industry with knowledge and expertise in cyber-physical systems, of which 2 may be selected from Federal laboratories.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(d) Report- Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Act of 2010, the Director of the National Coordination Office shall transmit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives a report describing the findings and recommendations of the task force.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 115. NATIONAL COORDINATION OFFICE.
Section 102 of such Act (
‘SEC. 102. NATIONAL COORDINATION OFFICE.
‘(a) Establishment- The Director shall establish a National Coordination Office with a Director and full-time staff.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(b) Functions- The National Coordination Office shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) provide technical and administrative support to--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(A) the agencies participating in planning and implementing the Program, including such support as needed in the development of the strategic plan under section 101(e); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(B) the advisory committee established under section 101(b);CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) serve as the primary point of contact on Federal networking and information technology activities for government organizations, academia, industry, professional societies, State computing and networking technology programs, interested citizen groups, and others to exchange technical and programmatic information;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(3) solicit input and recommendations from a wide range of stakeholders during the development of each strategic plan required under section 101(e) through the convening of at least 1 workshop with invitees from academia, industry, Federal laboratories, and other relevant organizations and institutions;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(4) conduct public outreach, including the dissemination of findings and recommendations of the advisory committee, as appropriate; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(5) promote access to and early application of the technologies, innovations, and expertise derived from Program activities to agency missions and systems across the Federal Government and to United States industry.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(c) Source of Funding-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) IN GENERAL- The operation of the National Coordination Office shall be supported by funds from each agency participating in the Program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) SPECIFICATIONS- The portion of the total budget of such Office that is provided by each agency for each fiscal year shall be in the same proportion as each such agency’s share of the total budget for the Program for the previous fiscal year, as specified in the report required under section 101(a)(3).’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 116. IMPROVING NETWORKING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION.
Section 201(a) of such Act (
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (4) as paragraphs (3) through (5), respectively; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) the National Science Foundation shall use its existing programs, in collaboration with other agencies, as appropriate, to improve the teaching and learning of networking and information technology at all levels of education and to increase participation in networking and information technology fields, including by women and underrepresented minorities;’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 117. CONFORMING AND TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.
(a) Section 3- Section 3 of such Act (
(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ‘high-performance computing’ and inserting ‘networking and information technology’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking ‘high-performance computing’ and inserting ‘networking and information technology’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) in subparagraphs (A) and (F) of paragraph (1), by striking ‘high-performance computing’ each place it appears and inserting ‘networking and information technology’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) in paragraph (2)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) by striking ‘high-performance computing and’ and inserting ‘networking and information technology and’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) by striking ‘high-performance computing network’ and inserting ‘networking and information technology’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Title I- The heading of title I of such Act (
(c) Section 101- Section 101 of such Act (
(1) in the section heading, by striking ‘high-performance computing’ and inserting ‘networking and information technology research and development’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in subsection (a)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘National High-Performance Computing’ and inserting ‘Networking and Information Technology Research and Development’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) in paragraph (1) of such subsection--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking ‘National High-Performance Computing Program’ and inserting ‘networking and information technology research and development program’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘high-performance computing, including networking’ and inserting ‘networking and information technology’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iii) in subparagraphs (B), (C), and (G), by striking ‘high-performance’ each place it appears and inserting ‘high-end’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) in paragraph (2) of such subsection--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) in subparagraphs (A) and (C)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(I) by striking ‘high-performance computing’ each place it appears and inserting ‘networking and information technology’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(II) by striking ‘development, networking,’ each place it appears and inserting ‘development,’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) in subparagraphs (F) and (G), as redesignated by section 112(c)(1) of this Act, by striking ‘high-performance’ each place it appears and inserting ‘high-end’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) in subsection (b)(1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking ‘high-performance computing’ both places it appears and inserting ‘networking and information technology’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) in subsection (c)(1)(A), by striking ‘high-performance computing’ and inserting ‘networking and information technology’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Section 201- Section 201(a)(1) of such Act (
(e) Section 202- Section 202(a) of such Act (
(f) Section 203- Section 203(a)(1) of such Act (
(g) Section 204- Section 204(a)(1) of such Act (
(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘high-performance computing systems and networks’ and inserting ‘networking and information technology systems and capabilities’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘high-performance computing’ and inserting ‘networking and information technology’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(h) Section 205- Section 205(a) of such Act (
(i) Section 206- Section 206(a) of such Act (
(j) Section 208- Section 208 of such Act (
(1) in the section heading, by striking ‘high-performance computing’ and inserting ‘networking and information technology’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in subsection (a)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘High-performance computing and associated’ and inserting ‘Networking and information’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘high-performance computing’ and inserting ‘networking and information technologies’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘high-performance computers and associated’ and inserting ‘networking and information’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘high-performance computing and associated’ and inserting ‘networking and information’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Other OSTP ProvisionsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--Other OSTP ProvisionsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 121. FEDERAL SCIENTIFIC COLLECTIONS.
(a) Management of Scientific Collections- The Office of Science and Technology Policy, in consultation with relevant Federal agencies, shall ensure the development of formal policies for the management and use of Federal scientific collections to improve the quality, organization, access, including online access, and long-term preservation of such collections for the benefit of the scientific enterprise.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Definition- For the purposes of this section, the term ‘scientific collection’ means a set of physical specimens, living or inanimate, created for the purpose of supporting science and serving as a long-term research asset, rather than for their market value as collectibles or their historical, artistic, or cultural significance.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Clearinghouse- The Office of Science and Technology Policy, in consultation with relevant Federal agencies, shall ensure the development of an online clearinghouse for information on the contents of and access to Federal scientific collections.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Disposal of Collections- The policies developed under subsection (a) shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) require that, before disposing of a scientific collection, a Federal agency shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) conduct a review of the research value of the collection; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) consult with researchers who have used the collection, and other potentially interested parties, concerning--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) the collection’s value for research purposes; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) possible additional educational uses for the collection; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) include procedures for Federal agencies to transfer scientific collections they no longer need to researchers at institutions or other entities qualified to manage the collections.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(e) Cost Projections- The Office of Science and Technology Policy, in consultation with relevant Federal agencies, shall develop a common set of methodologies to be used by Federal agencies for the assessment and projection of costs associated with the management and preservation of their scientific collections.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 122. COORDINATION OF MANUFACTURING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
(a) Interagency Committee- The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall establish or designate an interagency committee under the National Science and Technology Council with the responsibility for planning and coordinating Federal programs and activities in manufacturing research and development.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Responsibilities of Committee- The interagency committee established or designated under subsection (a) shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) coordinate the manufacturing research and development programs and activities of the Federal agencies;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) establish goals and priorities for manufacturing research and development that will strengthen United States manufacturing; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) develop and update every 5 years thereafter a strategic plan to guide Federal programs and activities in support of manufacturing research and development, which shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) specify and prioritize near-term and long-term research and development objectives, the anticipated time frame for achieving the objectives, and the metrics for use in assessing progress toward the objectives;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) specify the role of each Federal agency in carrying out or sponsoring research and development to meet the objectives of the strategic plan;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) describe how the Federal agencies supporting manufacturing research and development will foster the transfer of research and development results into new manufacturing technologies, processes, and products for the benefit of society and the national interest; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) describe how the Federal agencies supporting manufacturing research and development will strengthen all levels of manufacturing education and training programs to ensure an adequate, well-trained workforce.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Recommendations- In the development of the strategic plan required under subsection (b)(3), the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, working through the interagency committee, shall take into consideration the recommendations of a wide range of stakeholders, including representatives from diverse manufacturing companies, academia, and other relevant organizations and institutions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Report to Congress- Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall transmit the strategic plan developed under subsection (b)(3) to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives, and shall transmit subsequent updates to those committees when completed.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 123. INTERAGENCY PUBLIC ACCESS COMMITTEE.
(a) Establishment- The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall establish a working group under the National Science and Technology Council with the responsibility to coordinate Federal science agency research and policies related to the dissemination and long-term stewardship of the results of unclassified research, including digital data and peer-reviewed scholarly publications, supported wholly, or in part, by funding from the Federal science agencies.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Responsibilities- The working group established under subsection (a) shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) coordinate the development or designation of uniform standards for research data, the structure of full text and metadata, navigation tools, and other applications to achieve interoperability across Federal science agencies, across science and engineering disciplines, and between research data and scholarly publications, taking into account existing consensus standards, including international standards;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) coordinate Federal science agency programs and activities that support research and education on tools and systems required to ensure preservation and stewardship of all forms of digital research data, including scholarly publications;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) work with international science and technology counterparts to maximize interoperability between United States based unclassified research databases and international databases and repositories;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) solicit input and recommendations from, and collaborate with, non-Federal stakeholders, including universities, nonprofit and for-profit publishers, libraries, federally funded research scientists, and other organizations and institutions with a stake in long term preservation and access to the results of federally funded research; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) establish priorities for coordinating the development of any Federal science agency policies related to public access to the results of federally funded research to maximize uniformity of such policies with respect to their benefit to, and potential economic or other impact on, the science and engineering enterprise and the stakeholders thereof.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Patent or Copyright Law- Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect any right under the provisions of title 17 or 35, United States Code.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Report to Congress- Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall transmit a report to Congress describing--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) any priorities established under subsection (b)(5);CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) the status of any Federal science agency policies related to public access to the results of federally funded research; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) how any policies developed or being developed by Federal science agencies, as described in paragraph (2), incorporate input from the non-Federal stakeholders described in subsection (b)(4).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(e) Definition- For the purposes of this section, the term ‘Federal science agency’ means any Federal agency with an annual extramural research expenditure of over $100,000,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(f) Sense of Congress Regarding Peer Review- It is the sense of Congress that peer review is an important part of the process of ensuring the integrity of the record of scientific research, and that the National Science and Technology Council working group established under this section should take into account the role that scientific publishers play in the peer review process.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 124. FULFILLING THE POTENTIAL OF WOMEN IN ACADEMIC SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING.
(a) Definition- In this section, the term ‘Federal science agency’ means any Federal agency that is responsible for at least 2 percent of total Federal research and development funding to institutions of higher education, according to the most recent data available from the National Science Foundation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Workshops To Enhance Gender Equity in Academic Science and Engineering-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall develop a uniform policy for all Federal science agencies to carry out a program of workshops that educate program officers, members of grant review panels, institution of higher education STEM department chairs, and other federally funded researchers about methods that minimize the effects of gender bias in evaluation of Federal research grants and in the related academic advancement of actual and potential recipients of these grants, including hiring, tenure, promotion, and selection for any honor based in part on the recipient’s research record.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) INTERAGENCY COORDINATION- The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall ensure that programs of workshops across the Federal science agencies are coordinated and supported jointly as appropriate. As part of this process, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall ensure that at least 1 workshop is supported every 2 years among the Federal science agencies in each of the major science and engineering disciplines supported by those agencies.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) ORGANIZATIONS ELIGIBLE TO CARRY OUT WORKSHOPS- Federal science agencies may carry out the program of workshops under this subsection by making grants to eligible organizations. In addition to any other organizations made eligible by the Federal science agencies, the following organizations are eligible for grants under this subsection:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) Nonprofit scientific and professional societies and organizations that represent one or more STEM disciplines.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) Nonprofit organizations that have the primary mission of advancing the participation of women in STEM.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) CHARACTERISTICS OF WORKSHOPS- The workshops shall have the following characteristics:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) Invitees to workshops shall include at least--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) the chairs of departments in the relevant discipline from at least the top 50 institutions of higher education, as determined by the amount of Federal research and development funds obligated to each institution of higher education in the prior year based on data available from the National Science Foundation;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) members of any standing research grant review panel appointed by the Federal science agencies in the relevant discipline;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iii) in the case of science and engineering disciplines supported by the Department of Energy, the individuals from each of the Department of Energy National Laboratories with personnel management responsibilities comparable to those of an institution of higher education department chair; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iv) Federal science agency program officers in the relevant discipline, other than program officers that participate in comparable workshops organized and run specifically for that agency’s program officers.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) Activities at the workshops shall include research presentations and interactive discussions or other activities that increase the awareness of the existence of gender bias in the grant-making process and the development of the academic record necessary to qualify as a grant recipient, including recruitment, hiring, tenure review, promotion, and other forms of formal recognition of individual achievement, and provide strategies to overcome such bias.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) Research presentations and other workshop programs, as appropriate, shall include a discussion of the unique challenges faced by women who are members of historically underrepresented groups.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) Workshop programs shall include information on best practices and the value of mentoring undergraduate and graduate women students as well as outreach to girls earlier in their STEM education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) REPORT-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) IN GENERAL- Not later than 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall transmit to the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report evaluating the effectiveness of the program carried out under this subsection to reduce gender bias towards women engaged in research funded by the Federal Government. The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall include in this report any recommendations for improving the evaluation process described in subparagraph (B).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) MINIMUM CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION- In determining the effectiveness of the program, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall consider, at a minimum--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) the rates of participation by invitees in the workshops authorized under this subsection;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) the results of attitudinal surveys conducted on workshop participants before and after the workshops;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iii) any relevant institutional policy or practice changes reported by participants; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iv) for individuals described in paragraph (4)(A)(i) or (iii) who participated in at least 1 workshop 3 or more years prior to the due date for the report, trends in the data for the department represented by the chair or employee including faculty data related to gender as described in section 216.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) INSTITUTIONAL ATTENDANCE AT WORKSHOPS- As part of the report under subparagraph (A), the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall include a list of institutions of higher education science and engineering departments whose representatives attended the workshops required under this subsection.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) MINIMIZING COSTS- To the extent practicable, workshops shall be held in conjunction with national or regional disciplinary meetings to minimize costs associated with participant travel.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Extended Research Grant Support and Interim Technical Support for Caregivers-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) POLICIES FOR CAREGIVERS- Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall develop a uniform policy to--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) extend the period of grant support for federally funded researchers who have caregiving responsibilities; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) provide funding for interim technical staff support for federally funded researchers who take a leave of absence for caregiving responsibilities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) REPORT- Upon developing the policy required under paragraph (1), the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall transmit a copy of the policy to the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Collection of Data on Federal Research Grants-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- Each Federal science agency shall collect standardized annual composite information on demographics, field, award type and budget request, review score, and funding outcome for all applications for research and development grants to institutions of higher education supported by that agency.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) REPORTING OF DATA-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall establish a policy to ensure uniformity and standardization of data collection required under paragraph (1).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, each Federal science agency shall submit data collected under paragraph (1) to the National Science Foundation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) The National Science Foundation shall be responsible for storing and publishing all of the grant data submitted under subparagraph (B), disaggregated and cross-tabulated by race, ethnicity, and gender, in conjunction with the biennial report required under section 37 of the Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act (
SEC. 125. NATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS AND INNOVATION STRATEGY.
Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy shall submit to Congress and the President a national competitiveness and innovation strategy for strengthening the innovative and competitive capacity of the Federal Government, State and local governments, institutions of higher education, and the private sector that includes--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) proposed legislative changes and action;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) proposed actions to be taken collectively by executive agencies, including White House offices;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) proposed actions to be taken by individual executive agencies, including White House offices; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) a proposal for metrics-based monitoring and oversight of the progress of the Federal Government with respect to improving conditions for the innovation occurring in and the competitiveness of the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE II--NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATIONCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE II--NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATIONCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 201. SHORT TITLE.
This title may be cited as the ‘National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2010’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle A--General ProvisionsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle A--General ProvisionsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 211. DEFINITIONS.
In this title:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) DIRECTOR- The term ‘Director’ means the Director of the National Science Foundation established under section 2 of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 (
(2) FOUNDATION- The term ‘Foundation’ means the National Science Foundation established under section 2 of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 (
(3) INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION- The term ‘institution of higher education’ has the meaning given such term in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (
(4) STATE- The term ‘State’ means one of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or any other territory or possession of the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) STEM- The term ‘STEM’ means science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) UNITED STATES- The term ‘United States’ means the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 212. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
(a) Fiscal Year 2011-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- There are authorized to be appropriated to the Foundation $7,481,000,000 for fiscal year 2011.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) SPECIFIC ALLOCATIONS- Of the amount authorized under paragraph (1)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) $6,020,000,000 shall be made available for research and related activities;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) $945,000,000 shall be made available for education and human resources;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) $166,000,000 shall be made available for major research equipment and facilities construction;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) $330,000,000 shall be made available for agency operations and award management;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(E) $4,840,000 shall be made available for the Office of the National Science Board; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(F) $14,830,000 shall be made available for the Office of Inspector General.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Fiscal Year 2012-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- There are authorized to be appropriated to the Foundation $8,127,000,000 for fiscal year 2012.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) SPECIFIC ALLOCATIONS- Of the amount authorized under paragraph (1)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) $6,496,000,000 shall be made available for research and related activities;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) $1,020,000,000 shall be made available for education and human resources;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) $235,000,000 shall be made available for major research equipment and facilities construction;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) $356,000,000 shall be made available for agency operations and award management;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(E) $5,010,000 shall be made available for the Office of the National Science Board; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(F) $15,350,000 shall be made available for the Office of Inspector General.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Fiscal Year 2013-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- There are authorized to be appropriated to the Foundation $8,764,000,000 for fiscal year 2013.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) SPECIFIC ALLOCATIONS- Of the amount authorized under paragraph (1)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) $7,009,000,000 shall be made available for research and related activities;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) $1,100,000,000 shall be made available for education and human resources;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) $250,000,000 shall be made available for major research equipment and facilities construction;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) $384,000,000 shall be made available for agency operations and award management;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(E) $5,180,000 shall be made available for the Office of the National Science Board; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(F) $15,890,000 shall be made available for the Office of Inspector General.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 213. NATIONAL SCIENCE BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS.
(a) Staffing at the National Science Board- Section 4(g) of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 (
(b) Science and Engineering Indicators Due Date- Section 4(j)(1) of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 (
(c) National Science Board Reports- Section 4(j)(2) of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 (
(d) Board Adherence to Sunshine Act- Section 15(a) of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2002 (
(1) by striking paragraph (3) and redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in paragraph (3), as so redesignated by paragraph (1) of this subsection--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) by striking ‘February 15’ and inserting ‘April 15’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) by striking ‘the audit required under paragraph (3) along with’ and inserting ‘any’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) in paragraph (4), as so redesignated by paragraph (1) of this subsection, by striking ‘To facilitate the audit required under paragraph (3) of this subsection, the’ and inserting ‘The’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 214. BROADER IMPACTS REVIEW CRITERION.
(a) Goals- The Foundation shall apply a Broader Impacts Review Criterion to achieve the following goals:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) Increased economic competitiveness of the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) Development of a globally competitive STEM workforce.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) Increased participation of women and underrepresented minorities in STEM.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) Increased partnerships between academia and industry.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) Improved pre-K-12 STEM education and teacher development.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) Improved undergraduate STEM education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(7) Increased public scientific literacy.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(8) Increased national security.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Policy- Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall develop and implement a policy for the Broader Impacts Review Criterion that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) provides for educating professional staff at the Foundation, merit review panels, and applicants for Foundation research grants on the policy developed under this subsection;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) clarifies that the activities of grant recipients undertaken to satisfy the Broader Impacts Review Criterion shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) to the extent practicable employ proven strategies and models and draw on existing programs and activities; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) when novel approaches are justified, build on the most current research results;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) allows for some portion of funds allocated to broader impacts under a research grant to be used for assessment and evaluation of the broader impacts activity;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) encourages institutions of higher education and other nonprofit education or research organizations to develop and provide, either as individual institutions or in partnerships thereof, appropriate training and programs to assist Foundation-funded principal investigators at their institutions in achieving the goals of the Broader Impacts Review Criterion as described in subsection (a); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) requires principal investigators applying for Foundation research grants to provide evidence of institutional support for the portion of the investigator’s proposal designed to satisfy the Broader Impacts Review Criterion, including evidence of relevant training, programs, and other institutional resources available to the investigator from either their home institution or organization or another institution or organization with relevant expertise.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 215. NATIONAL CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING STATISTICS.
(a) Establishment- There is established within the Foundation a National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (in this section referred to as the ‘Center’), that shall serve as a central Federal clearinghouse for the collection, interpretation, analysis, and dissemination of objective data on science, engineering, technology, and research and development.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Duties- In carrying out subsection (a) of this section, the Director, acting through the Center shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) collect, acquire, analyze, report, and disseminate statistical data related to the science and engineering enterprise in the United States and other nations that is relevant and useful to practitioners, researchers, policymakers, and the public, including statistical data on--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) research and development trends;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) the science and engineering workforce;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) United States competitiveness in science, engineering, technology, and research and development; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) the condition and progress of United States STEM education;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) support research using the data it collects, and on methodologies in areas related to the work of the Center; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) support the education and training of researchers in the use of large-scale, nationally representative data sets.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Statistical Reports- The Director or the National Science Board, acting through the Center, shall issue regular, and as necessary, special statistical reports on topics related to the national and international science and engineering enterprise such as the biennial report required by section 4 (j)(1) of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 (
SEC. 216. COLLECTION OF DATA ON DEMOGRAPHICS OF FACULTY.
(a) Collection of Data- The Director shall report, in conjunction with the biennial report required under section 37 of the Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act (42 U.S.C.19 1885d), statistical summary data on the demographics of STEM discipline faculty at institutions of higher education in the United States, disaggregated and cross-tabulated by race, ethnicity, and gender. At a minimum, the Director shall consider--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) the number and percent of faculty by gender, race, and age;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) the number and percent of faculty at each rank, by gender, race, and age;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) the number and percent of faculty who are in nontenure-track positions, including teaching and research, by gender, race, and age;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) the number of faculty who are reviewed for promotion, including tenure, and the percentage of that number who are promoted, by gender, race, and age;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) faculty years in rank by gender, race, and age;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) faculty attrition by gender, race, and age;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(7) the number and percent of faculty hired by rank, gender, race, and age; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(8) the number and percent of faculty in leadership positions, including endowed or named chairs, serving on promotion and tenure committees, by gender, race, and age.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Recommendations- The Director shall solicit input and recommendations from relevant stakeholders, including representatives from institutions of higher education and nonprofit organizations, on the collection of data required under subsection (a), including the development of standard definitions on the terms and categories to be used in the collection of such data.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Report to Congress- Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit a report to Congress on how the Foundation will gather the demographic data on STEM faculty, including--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) a description of the data to be reported and the sources of those data;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) justification for the exclusion of any data described in paragraph (1); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) a list of the definitions for the terms and categories, such as ‘faculty’ and ‘leadership positions’, to be applied in the reporting of all data described in paragraph (1).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Research and InnovationCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle B--Research and InnovationCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 221. SUPPORT FOR POTENTIALLY TRANSFORMATIVE RESEARCH.
(a) Policy- The Director shall establish a policy that requires the Foundation to use at least 5 percent of its research budget to fund high-risk, high-reward basic research proposals. Support for facilities and infrastructure, including preconstruction design and operations and maintenance of major research facilities, shall not be counted as part of the research budget for the purposes of this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Implementation- In implementing such policy, the Foundation may--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) develop solicitations specifically for high-risk, high-reward basic research;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) establish review panels for the primary purpose of selecting high-risk, high-reward proposals or modify instructions to standard review panels to require identification of high-risk, high-reward proposals; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) support workshops and participate in conferences with the primary purpose of identifying new opportunities for high-risk, high-reward basic research, especially at interdisciplinary interfaces.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Definition- For purposes of this section, the term ‘high-risk, high-reward basic research’ means research driven by ideas that have the potential to radically change our understanding of an important existing scientific or engineering concept, or leading to the creation of a new paradigm or field of science or engineering, and that is characterized by its challenge to current understanding or its pathway to new frontiers.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 222. FACILITATING INTERDISCIPLINARY COLLABORATIONS FOR NATIONAL NEEDS.
(a) In General- The Director shall award competitive, merit-based awards in amounts not to exceed $5,000,000 over a period of up to 5 years to interdisciplinary research collaborations that are likely to assist in addressing critical challenges to national security, competitiveness, and societal well-being and that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) involve at least 2 co-equal principal investigators at the same or different institutions;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) draw upon well-integrated, diverse teams of investigators, including students or postdoctoral researchers, from one or more disciplines; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) foster creativity and pursue high-risk, high-reward research.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Priority- In selecting grant recipients under this section, the Director shall give priority to applicants that propose to utilize advances in cyberinfrastructure and simulation-based science and engineering.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 223. NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION MANUFACTURING RESEARCH AND EDUCATION.
(a) Manufacturing Research- The Director shall carry out a program to award merit-reviewed, competitive grants to institutions of higher education to support fundamental research leading to transformative advances in manufacturing technologies, processes, and enterprises that will support United States manufacturing through improved performance, productivity, sustainability, and competitiveness. Research areas may include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) nanomanufacturing;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) manufacturing and construction machines and equipment, including robotics, automation, and other intelligent systems;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) manufacturing enterprise systems;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) advanced sensing and control techniques;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) materials processing; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) information technologies for manufacturing, including predictive and real-time models and simulations, and virtual manufacturing.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Manufacturing Education- In order to help ensure a well-trained manufacturing workforce, the Director shall award grants to strengthen and expand scientific and technical education and training in advanced manufacturing, including through the Foundation’s Advanced Technological Education program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 224. STRENGTHENING INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS.
(a) In General- For any Foundation research grant, in an amount greater than $2,000,000, to be carried out through a partnership that includes one or more minority-serving institutions or predominantly undergraduate institutions and one or more institutions described in subsection (b), the Director shall award funds directly, according to the budget justification described in the grant proposal, to at least two of the institutions of higher education in the partnership, including at least one minority-serving institution or one predominantly undergraduate institution, to ensure a strong and equitable partnership.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Institutions- The institutions referred to in subsection (a) are institutions of higher education that are among the 100 institutions receiving, over the 3-year period immediately preceding the awarding of grants, the highest amount of research funding from the Foundation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Report- Not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall provide a report to Congress on institutional research partnerships identified in subsection (a) funded in the previous fiscal year.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 225. NATIONAL SCIENCE BOARD REPORT ON MID-SCALE INSTRUMENTATION.
(a) Mid-Scale Research Instrumentation Needs- The National Science Board shall evaluate the needs, across all disciplines supported by the Foundation, for mid-scale research instrumentation that falls between the instruments funded by the Major Research Instrumentation program and the very large projects funded by the Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Report on Mid-Scale Research Instrumentation Program- Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the National Science Board shall submit to Congress a report on mid-scale research instrumentation at the Foundation. At a minimum, this report shall include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) the findings from the Board’s evaluation of instrumentation needs required under subsection (a), including a description of differences across disciplines and Foundation research directorates;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) a recommendation or recommendations regarding how the Foundation should set priorities for mid-scale instrumentation across disciplines and Foundation research directorates;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) a recommendation or recommendations regarding the appropriateness of expanding existing programs, including the Major Research Instrumentation program or the Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction program, to support more instrumentation at the mid-scale;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) a recommendation or recommendations regarding the need for and appropriateness of a new, Foundation-wide program or initiative in support of mid-scale instrumentation, including any recommendations regarding the administration of and budget for such a program or initiative and the appropriate scope of instruments to be funded under such a program or initiative; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) any recommendation or recommendations regarding other options for supporting mid-scale research instrumentation at the Foundation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 226. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON OVERALL SUPPORT FOR RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE AT THE FOUNDATION.
It is the sense of Congress that the Foundation should strive to keep the percentage of the Foundation budget devoted to research infrastructure in the range of 24 to 27 percent, as recommended in the 2003 National Science Board report entitled ‘Science and Engineering Infrastructure for the 21st Century’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 227. PARTNERSHIPS FOR INNOVATION.
(a) In General- The Director shall carry out a program to award merit-reviewed, competitive grants to institutions of higher education to establish and to expand partnerships that promote innovation and increase the economic and social impact of research by developing tools and resources to connect new scientific discoveries to practical uses.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Partnerships-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- To be eligible for funding under this section, an institution of higher education must propose establishment of a partnership that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) includes at least one private sector entity; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) may include other institutions of higher education, public sector institutions, private sector entities, and social enterprise nonprofit organizations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) PRIORITY- In selecting grant recipients under this section, the Director shall give priority to partnerships that include one or more institutions of higher education that are among the 100 institutions receiving, over the 3-year period immediately preceding the awarding of grants, the highest amount of research funding from the Foundation and at least one of the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) A minority serving institution.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) A primarily undergraduate institution.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) A 2-year institution of higher education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Program- Proposals funded under this section shall seek to--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) increase the economic or social impact of the most promising research at the institution or institutions of higher education that are members of the partnership through knowledge transfer or commercialization;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) increase the engagement of faculty and students across multiple disciplines and departments, including faculty and students in schools of business and other appropriate non-STEM fields and disciplines in knowledge transfer activities;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) enhance education and mentoring of students and faculty in innovation and entrepreneurship through networks, courses, and development of best practices and curricula;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) strengthen the culture of the institution or institutions of higher education to undertake and participate in activities related to innovation and leading to economic or social impact;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) broaden the participation of all types of institutions of higher education in activities to meet STEM workforce needs and promote innovation and knowledge transfer; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) build lasting partnerships with local and regional businesses, local and State governments, and other relevant entities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Additional Criteria- In selecting grant recipients under this section, the Director shall also consider the extent to which the applicants are able to demonstrate evidence of institutional support for, and commitment to--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) achieving the goals of the program as described in subsection (c);CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) expansion to an institution-wide program if the initial proposal is not for an institution-wide program; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) sustaining any new innovation tools and resources generated from funding under this program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(e) Limitation- No funds provided under this section may be used to construct or renovate a building or structure.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 228. PRIZE AWARDS.
(a) Short Title- This section may be cited as the ‘Generating Extraordinary New Innovations in the United States Act of 2010’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) In General- The Director shall carry out a pilot program to award innovation inducement cash prizes in any area of research supported by the Foundation. The Director may carry out a program of cash prizes only in conformity with this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Topics- In identifying topics for prize competitions under this section, the Director shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) consult widely both within and outside the Federal Government;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) give priority to high-risk, high-reward research challenges and to problems whose solution could improve the economic competitiveness of the United States; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) give consideration to the extent to which the topics have the potential to raise public awareness about federally sponsored research.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Types of Contests- The Director shall consider all categories of innovation inducement prizes, including--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) contests in which the award is to the first team or individual who accomplishes a stated objective; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) contests in which the winner is the team or individual who comes closest to achieving an objective within a specified time.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(e) Advertising and Announcement-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) ADVERTISING AND SOLICITATION OF COMPETITORS- The Director shall widely advertise prize competitions to encourage broad participation, including by individuals, institutions of higher education, nonprofit organizations, and businesses.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) ANNOUNCEMENT THROUGH FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE- The Director shall announce each prize competition by publishing a notice in the Federal Register. This notice shall include the subject of the competition, the duration of the competition, the eligibility requirements for participation in the competition, the process for participants to register for the competition, the amount of the prize, and the criteria for awarding the prize, including the method by which the prize winner or winners will be selected.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) TIME TO ANNOUNCEMENT- The Director shall announce a prize competition within 18 months after receipt of appropriated funds.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(f) Funding-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) FUNDING SOURCES- Prizes under this section shall consist of Federal appropriated funds and any funds raised pursuant to donations authorized under section 11(f) of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 (
(2) ANNOUNCEMENT OF PRIZES- The Director may not issue a notice as required by subsection (e)(2) until all of the funds needed to pay out the announced amount of the prize have been appropriated or committed in writing by another entity pursuant to paragraph (1).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(g) Eligibility- To be eligible to win a prize under this section, an individual or entity--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) shall have complied with all of the requirements under this section;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in the case of a private entity, shall be incorporated in and maintain a primary place of business in the United States, and in the case of an individual, whether participating singly or in a group, shall be a United States citizen or national, or an alien lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) shall not be a Federal entity, a Federal employee acting within the scope of his or her employment, or a person employed at a Federal laboratory acting within the scope of his or her employment; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) shall not have utilized Federal funds to engage in research on the topic for which the prize is being awarded.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(h) Awards-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) NUMBER OF COMPETITIONS- The Director may announce up to 5 prize competitions through the end of fiscal year 2013.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) SIZE OF AWARD- The Director may determine the amount of each prize award based on the prize topic, but no award shall be less than $1,000,000 or greater than $3,000,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) SELECTING WINNERS- The Director may convene an expert panel to select a winner of a prize competition. If the panel is unable to select a winner, the Director shall determine the winner of the prize.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) PUBLIC OUTREACH- The Director shall publicly award prizes utilizing the Foundation’s existing public affairs and public outreach resources.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) Administering the Competition- The Director may enter into an agreement with a private, nonprofit entity to administer the prize competition, subject to the provisions of this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(j) Intellectual Property- The Federal Government shall not, by virtue of offering or awarding a prize under this section, be entitled to any intellectual property rights derived as a consequence of, or in direct relation to, the participation by a registered participant in a competition authorized by this section. This subsection shall not be construed to prevent the Federal Government from negotiating a license for the use of intellectual property developed for a prize competition under this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(k) Liability- The Director may require a registered participant in a prize competition under this section to waive liability against the Federal Government for injuries and damages that result from participation in such competition.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(l) Nonsubstitution- Any programs created under this section shall not be considered a substitute for Federal research and development programs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(m) Reporting Requirement- Not later than 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the National Science Board shall transmit to Congress a report containing the results of a review and assessment of the pilot program under this section, including--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) a description of the nature and status of all completed or ongoing prize competitions carried out under this section, including any scientific achievements, publications, intellectual property, or commercialized technology that resulted from such competitions;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) any recommendations regarding changes to, the termination of, or continuation of the pilot program;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) an analysis of whether the program is attracting contestants more diverse than the Foundation’s traditional academic constituency;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) an analysis of whether public awareness of innovation or of the goal of the particular prize or prizes is enhanced;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) an analysis of whether the Foundation’s public image or ability to increase public scientific literacy is enhanced through the use of innovation inducement prizes; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) an analysis of the extent to which private funds are being used to support registered participants.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(n) Early Termination of Contests- The Director shall terminate a prize contest before any registered participant wins if the Director determines that an unregistered entity has produced an innovation that would otherwise have qualified for the prize award.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(o) Authorization of Appropriations-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) AWARDS- There are authorized to be appropriated to the Director for the period encompassing fiscal years 2011 through 2013 $12,000,000 for carrying out this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) ADMINISTRATION- Of the amounts authorized in subparagraph (A), not more than 15 percent for each fiscal year shall be available for the administrative costs of carrying out this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) CARRYOVER OF FUNDS- Funds appropriated for prize awards under this section shall remain available until expended, and may be transferred, reprogrammed, or expended for other purposes as authorized by law only after the expiration of 7 fiscal years after the fiscal year for which the funds were originally appropriated. No provision in this section permits obligation or payment of funds in violation of section 1341 of title 31 of the United States Code (commonly referred to as the Anti-Deficiency Act).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 229. GREEN CHEMISTRY BASIC RESEARCH.
The Director shall establish a Green Chemistry Basic Research program to award competitive, merit-based grants to support research into green and sustainable chemistry which will lead to clean, safe, and economical alternatives to traditional chemical products and practices. The research program shall provide sustained support for green chemistry research, education, and technology transfer through--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) merit-reviewed competitive grants to individual investigators and teams of investigators, including, to the extent practicable, young investigators, for research;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) grants to fund collaborative research partnerships among universities, industry, and nonprofit organizations;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) symposia, forums, and conferences to increase outreach, collaboration, and dissemination of green chemistry advances and practices; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) education, training, and retraining of undergraduate and graduate students and professional chemists and chemical engineers, including through partnerships with industry, in green chemistry science and engineering.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 230. COLLABORATION IN PLANNING FOR STEWARDSHIP OF LARGE-SCALE FACILITIES.
It is the sense of Congress that the Foundation should, in its planning for construction and stewardship of large facilities, coordinate and collaborate with other Federal agencies, including the Department of Energy’s Office of Science, to ensure that joint investments may be made when practicable. In particular, the Foundation should ensure that it responds to recommendations by the National Academy of Sciences and working groups convened by the National Science and Technology Council regarding such facilities and opportunities for partnership with other agencies in the design and construction of such facilities. For facilities in which research in multiple disciplines will be possible, the Director should include multiple units within the Foundation during the planning process.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--STEM Education and Workforce TrainingCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Subtitle C--STEM Education and Workforce TrainingCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 241. GRADUATE STUDENT SUPPORT.
(a) Finding- The Congress finds that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) the Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship program is an important program for training the next generation of scientists and engineers in team-based interdisciplinary research and problem solving, and for providing them with the many additional skills, such as communication skills, needed to thrive in diverse STEM careers; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) the Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship program is no less valuable to the preparation and support of graduate students than the Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Equal Treatment of IGERT and GRF- Beginning in fiscal year 2011, the Director shall increase or, if necessary, decrease funding for the Foundation’s Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship program (or any program by which it is replaced) at least at the same rate as it increases or decreases funding for the Graduate Research Fellowship program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Support for Graduate Student Research From the Research Account- For each of the fiscal years 2011 through 2013, at least 50 percent of the total Foundation funds allocated to the Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship program and the Graduate Research Fellowship program shall come from funds appropriated for Research and Related Activities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Cost of Education Allowance for GRF Program- Section 10 of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 (
(1) by inserting ‘(a)’ before ‘The Foundation is authorized’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(b) The Director shall establish for each year the amount to be awarded for scholarships and fellowships under this section for that year. Each such scholarship and fellowship shall include a cost of education allowance of $12,000, subject to any restrictions on the use of cost of education allowance as determined by the Director.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 242. POSTDOCTORAL FELLOWSHIP IN STEM EDUCATION RESEARCH.
(a) In General- The Director shall establish postdoctoral fellowships in STEM education research to provide recent doctoral degree graduates in STEM fields with the necessary skills to assume leadership roles in STEM education research, program development, and evaluation in our Nation’s diverse educational institutions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Awards-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) DURATION- Fellowships may be awarded under this section for a period of up to 24 months in duration, renewable for an additional 12 months. The Director shall establish criteria for eligibility for renewal of the fellowship.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) STIPEND- The Director shall determine the amount of the award for a fellowship, which shall include a stipend and a research allowance, and may include an educational allowance.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) LOCATION- A fellowship shall be awarded for research at any institution of higher education that offers degrees in fields supported by the Foundation, or at any institution or organization that the Director determines is eligible for education research grants from the Foundation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) NUMBER OF AWARDS- The Director may award up to 20 new fellowships per year.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Research- Fellowships under this section shall be awarded for research on STEM education at any educational level, including grades pre-K-12, undergraduate, graduate, and general public education, in both formal and informal settings. Research topics may include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) learning processes and progressions;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) knowledge transfer, including curriculum development;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) uses of technology as teaching and learning tools;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) integrating STEM fields; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) assessment of student learning and program evaluation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Eligibility- To be eligible for a fellowship under this section, an individual must--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) be a United States citizen or national, or an alien lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence, at the time of application; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) have received a doctoral degree in one of the STEM fields supported by the Foundation within 3 years prior to the fellowship application deadline.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(e) Outreach- In carrying out the program under this section, the Director shall conduct outreach efforts to encourage applications from underrepresented groups.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 243. ROBERT NOYCE TEACHER SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM.
(a) Matching Requirement- Section 10A(h)(1) of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2002 (
‘(1) IN GENERAL- An eligible entity receiving a grant under this section shall provide, from non-Federal sources, to carry out the activities supported by the grant--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(A) in the case of grants in an amount of less than $1,500,000, an amount equal to at least 30 percent of the amount of the grant, at least one half of which shall be in cash; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(B) in the case of grants in an amount of $1,500,000 or more, an amount equal to at least 50 percent of the amount of the grant, at least one half of which shall be in cash.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Retiring STEM Professionals- Section 10A of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2002 (
SEC. 244. INSTITUTIONS SERVING PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES.
For the purposes of the activities and programs supported by the Foundation, institutions of higher education chartered to serve large numbers of students with disabilities, including Gallaudet University, Landmark College, and the National Technical Institute for the Deaf, shall have a designation consistent with the designation for other institutions that serve populations underrepresented in STEM to ensure that institutions of higher education chartered to serve persons with disabilities can benefit from STEM bridge programs and from research partnerships with major research universities. Nothing in this section shall be construed to amend or otherwise affect any of the definitions for minority-serving institutions under title III or title V of the Higher Education Act of 1965.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 245. INSTITUTIONAL INTEGRATION.
(a) Innovation Through Institutional Integration- The Director shall award grants for the institutional integration of projects funded by the Foundation with a focus on education, or on broadening participation in STEM by underrepresented groups, for the purpose of increasing collaboration and coordination across funded projects and institutions and expanding the impact of such projects within and among institutions of higher education in an innovative and sustainable manner.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Program Activities- The program under this section shall support integrative activities that involve the strategic and innovative combination of Foundation-funded projects and that provide for--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) additional opportunities to increase the recruitment, retention, and degree attainment of underrepresented groups in STEM disciplines;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) the inclusion of programming, practices, and policies that encourage the integration of education and research;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) seamless transitions from one educational level to another, including from a 2-year to a 4-year institution; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) other activities that expand and deepen the impact of Foundation-funded projects with a focus on education, or on broadening participation in STEM by underrepresented groups, and enhance their sustainability.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Review Criteria- In selecting recipients of grants under this section, the Director shall consider at a minimum--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) the extent to which the proposed project addresses the goals of project and program integration and adds value to the existing funded projects;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) the extent to which there is a proven record of success for the existing projects on which the proposed integration project is based; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) the extent to which the proposed project addresses the modification of programming, practices, and policies necessary to achieve the purpose described in subsection (a).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Priority- In selecting recipients of grants under this section, the Director shall give priority to proposals for which a senior institutional administrator, including a dean or other administrator of equal or higher rank, serves as the principal investigator.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 246. POSTDOCTORAL RESEARCH FELLOWSHIPS.
(a) In General- The Director shall establish a Foundation-wide postdoctoral research fellowship program, to award competitive, merit-based postdoctoral research fellowships in any field of research supported by the Foundation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Duration and Amount- Fellowships may be awarded under this section for a period of up to 3 years in duration. The Director shall determine the amount of the award for a fellowship, which shall include a stipend and a research allowance, and may include an educational allowance.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Eligibility- To be eligible to receive a fellowship under this section, an individual--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) must be a United States citizen or national, or an alien lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence, at the time of application;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) must have received a doctoral degree in any field of research supported by the Foundation within 3 years prior to the fellowship application deadline, or will complete a doctoral degree no more than 1 year after the application deadline; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) may not have previously received funding as the principal investigator of a research grant from the Foundation, unless such funding was received as a graduate student.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Priority- In evaluating applications for fellowships under this section, the Director shall give priority to applications that include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) proposals for interdisciplinary research; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) proposals for high-risk, high-reward research.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(e) Additional Considerations-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- In evaluating applications for fellowships under this section, the Director shall give consideration to the goal of promoting the participation of individuals identified in section 33 or 34 of the Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act (
(2) DEFINITION- For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘veteran’ means a person who--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) served on active duty (other than active duty for training) in the Armed Forces of the United States for a period of more than 180 consecutive days, and who was discharged or released therefrom under conditions other than dishonorable; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) served on active duty (other than active duty for training) in the Armed Forces of the United States and was discharged or released from such service for a service-connected disability before serving 180 consecutive days.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
For purposes of subparagraph (B), the term ‘service-connected’ has the meaning given such term under
(f) Nonsubstitution- The fellowship program authorized under this section is not intended to replace or reduce support for postdoctoral research through existing programs at the Foundation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(g) Outreach- In carrying out the program under this section, the Director shall conduct outreach efforts to encourage applications from underrepresented groups.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 247. BROADENING PARTICIPATION TRAINING AND OUTREACH.
The Director shall provide education and training--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) to Foundation staff and grant proposal review panels on effective mechanisms and tools for broadening participation in STEM by underrepresented groups, including reviewer selection and mitigation of implicit bias in the review process; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) to Foundation staff on related outreach approaches.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 248. TRANSFORMING UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION IN STEM.
Section 17 of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2002 (
‘SEC. 17. TRANSFORMING UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION IN STEM.
‘(a) In General- The Director shall award grants, on a competitive, merit-reviewed basis, to institutions of higher education (or to consortia thereof) to reform undergraduate STEM education for the purpose of increasing the number and quality of students studying toward and completing baccalaureate degrees in STEM and improving the STEM learning outcomes for all undergraduate students, including through--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) development, implementation, and assessment of innovative, research-based approaches to transforming the teaching and learning of disciplinary or interdisciplinary STEM at the undergraduate level; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) expansion of successful STEM reform efforts beyond a single course or group of courses to achieve reform within an entire academic unit, or expansion of successful reform efforts beyond a single academic unit to other STEM academic units within an institution or to comparable academic units at other institutions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(b) Uses of Funds- Activities supported by grants under this section may include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) creation of multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary courses or programs that formalize collaborations for the purpose of improved student instruction and research in STEM;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) expansion of undergraduate STEM research opportunities to include interdisciplinary research opportunities and research opportunities in industry, at Federal labs, and at international research institutions or research sites;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(3) implementation or expansion of bridge programs, including programs that address student transition from 2-year to 4-year institutions, and cohort, tutoring, or mentoring programs proven to enhance student recruitment or persistence to degree completion in STEM, including recruitment or persistence to degree completion of individuals identified in section 33 or 34 of the Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act (
42 U.S.C. 1885a or 1885b);CommentsClose CommentsPermalink‘(4) improvement of undergraduate STEM education for nonmajors, including education majors;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(5) implementation of evidence-based, technology-driven reform efforts that directly impact undergraduate STEM instruction or research experiences;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(6) development and implementation of faculty and graduate teaching assistant development programs focused on improved instruction, mentoring, assessment of student learning, and support of undergraduate STEM students;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(7) support for graduate students and postdoctoral fellows to participate in instructional or assessment activities at primarily undergraduate institutions;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(8) research on teaching and learning of STEM at the undergraduate level related to the proposed reform effort, including assessment and evaluation of the proposed reform activities, research on scalability and sustainability of approaches to reform, and development and implementation of longitudinal studies of students included in the proposed reform effort; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(9) support for initiatives that advance the integration of global challenges such as sustainability into disciplinary and interdisciplinary STEM education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(c) Partnership- An institution of higher education may partner with one or more other nonprofit education or research organizations, including scientific and engineering societies, for the purposes of carrying out the activities authorized under this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(d) Selection Process-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) APPLICATIONS- An institution of higher education seeking a grant under this section shall submit an application to the Director at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Director may require. The application shall include, at a minimum--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(A) a description of the proposed reform effort;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(B) a description of the research findings that will serve as the basis for the proposed reform effort or, in the case of applications that propose an expansion of a previously implemented reform effort, a description of the previously implemented reform effort, including indicators of success such as data on student recruitment, persistence to degree completion, and academic achievement;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(C) evidence of institutional support for, and commitment to, the proposed reform effort, including long-term commitment to implement successful strategies from the current reform effort beyond the academic unit or units included in the grant proposal or to disseminate successful strategies to other institutions;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(D) a description of existing or planned institutional policies and practices regarding faculty hiring, promotion, tenure, and teaching assignment that reward faculty contributions to undergraduate STEM education; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(E) a description of the plans for assessment and evaluation of the proposed reform activities, including evidence of participation by individuals with experience in assessment and evaluation of teaching and learning programs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS- In selecting grant recipients under this section, the Director shall consider at a minimum--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(A) the likelihood of success in undertaking the proposed effort at the institution submitting the application, including the extent to which the faculty, staff, and administrators of the institution are committed to making the proposed institutional reform a priority of the participating academic unit or units;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(B) the degree to which the proposed reform will contribute to change in institutional culture and policy such that a greater value is placed on faculty engagement in undergraduate education;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(C) the likelihood that the institution will sustain or expand the reform beyond the period of the grant; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(D) the degree to which scholarly assessment and evaluation plans are included in the design of the reform effort, including the degree to which such assessment and evaluation contribute to the systematic accumulation of knowledge on STEM education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(3) PRIORITY- For proposals that include an expansion of existing reform efforts beyond a single academic unit, the Director shall give priority to proposals for which a senior institutional administrator, including a dean or other administrator of equal or higher rank, serves as the principal investigator or a coprincipal investigator.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(4) GRANT DISTRIBUTION- The Director shall ensure, to the extent practicable, that grants awarded under this section are made to a variety of types of institutions of higher education.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 249. 21ST CENTURY GRADUATE EDUCATION.
(a) In General- The Director shall award grants, on a competitive, merit-reviewed basis, to institutions of higher education to implement or expand research-based reforms in master’s and doctoral level STEM education that emphasize preparation for diverse careers utilizing STEM degrees, including at diverse types of institutions of higher education, in industry, and at government agencies and research laboratories.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Uses of Funds- Activities supported by grants under this section may include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) creation of multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary courses or programs for the purpose of improved student instruction and research in STEM;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) expansion of graduate STEM research opportunities to include interdisciplinary research opportunities and research opportunities in industry, at Federal laboratories, and at international research institutions or research sites;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) development and implementation of future faculty training programs focused on improved instruction, mentoring, assessment of student learning, and support of undergraduate STEM students;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) support and training for graduate students to participate in instructional activities beyond the traditional teaching assistantship, and especially as part of ongoing educational reform efforts, including at pre-K-12 schools, informal science education institutions, and primarily undergraduate institutions;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) creation, improvement, or expansion of innovative graduate programs such as science master’s degree programs;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) development and implementation of seminars, workshops, and other professional development activities that increase the ability of graduate students to engage in innovation, technology transfer, and entrepreneurship;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(7) development and implementation of seminars, workshops, and other professional development activities that increase the ability of graduate students to effectively communicate their research findings to technical audiences outside of their own discipline and to nontechnical audiences;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(8) expansion of successful STEM reform efforts beyond a single academic unit to other STEM academic units within an institution or to comparable academic units at other institutions; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(9) research on teaching and learning of STEM at the graduate level related to the proposed reform effort, including assessment and evaluation of the proposed reform activities and research on scalability and sustainability of approaches to reform.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Partnership- An institution of higher education may partner with one or more other nonprofit education or research organizations, including scientific and engineering societies, for the purposes of carrying out the activities authorized under this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Selection Process-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) APPLICATIONS- An institution of higher education seeking a grant under this section shall submit an application to the Director at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Director may require. The application shall include, at a minimum--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) a description of the proposed reform effort;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) in the case of applications that propose an expansion of a previously implemented reform effort at the applicant’s institution or at other institutions, a description of the previously implemented reform effort;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) evidence of institutional support for, and commitment to, the proposed reform effort, including long-term commitment to implement successful strategies from the current reform effort beyond the academic unit or units included in the grant proposal or to disseminate successful strategies to other institutions; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) a description of the plans for assessment and evaluation of the grant proposed reform activities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS- In selecting grant recipients under this section, the Director shall consider at a minimum--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) the likelihood of success in undertaking the proposed effort at the institution submitting the application, including the extent to which the faculty, staff, and administrators of the institution are committed to making the proposed institutional reform a priority of the participating academic unit or units;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) the degree to which the proposed reform will contribute to change in institutional culture and policy such that a greater value is placed on preparing graduate students for diverse careers utilizing STEM degrees;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) the likelihood that the institution will sustain or expand the reform beyond the period of the grant; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) the degree to which scholarly assessment and evaluation plans are included in the design of the reform effort.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(e) Repeal- Section 7034 of the America COMPETES Act (
SEC. 250. UNDERGRADUATE BROADENING PARTICIPATION PROGRAM.
(a) Undergraduate Broadening Participation Program- The Foundation shall continue to support the Historically Black Colleges and Universities Undergraduate Program, the Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation program, and the Tribal Colleges and Universities Program as separate programs at least through September 30, 2011.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Plan- Prior to any realignment or consolidation of the programs described in subsection (a), in addition to the Hispanic-Serving Institutions Undergraduate Program required by section 7033 of the America COMPETES Act (
(1) meeting or strengthening the common goal of the separate programs to increase the number of individuals from underrepresented groups attaining undergraduate STEM degrees; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) addressing the unique needs of the different types of minority serving institutions and underrepresented groups currently provided for by the separate programs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Recommendations- In the development of the plan required under subsection (b), the Director shall at a minimum--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) consider the recommendations and findings of the National Academy of Sciences report required by section 7032 of the America COMPETES Act (
(2) solicit recommendations and feedback from a wide range of stakeholders, including representatives from minority serving institutions, other institutions of higher education, and other entities with expertise on effective mechanisms to increase the recruitment and retention of members of underrepresented groups in STEM fields, and the attainment of STEM degrees by underrepresented groups.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Approval by Congress- The plan developed under this section shall be transmitted to Congress at least 3 months prior to the implementation of any realignment or consolidation of the programs described in subsection (a).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 251. GRAND CHALLENGES IN EDUCATION RESEARCH.
(a) In General- The Director and the Secretary of Education shall collaborate, in consultation with the Director of the National Institutes of Health, in--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) identifying, prioritizing, and developing strategies to address grand challenges in research and development on the teaching and learning of STEM at the pre-K-12 level, in formal and informal settings, for diverse learning populations, including individuals identified in section 33 or 34 of the Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act (
(2) carrying out research and development to address the grand challenges identified in paragraph (1); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) ensuring the dissemination of the results of such research and development.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Stakeholder Input- In identifying the grand challenges required in subsection (a), the Director and the Secretary shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) take into consideration critical research gaps identified in existing reports, including reports by the National Academies, on the teaching and learning of STEM at the pre-K-12 level in formal and informal settings; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) solicit input from a wide range of stakeholders, including local and State education officials, STEM teachers, STEM education researchers, scientific and engineering societies, STEM faculty at institutions of higher education, informal STEM education providers, businesses with a large STEM workforce, and other stakeholders in the teaching and learning of STEM at the pre-K-12 level, and may enter into an arrangement with the National Research Council for these purposes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Topics To Consider- In identifying the grand challenges required in subsection (a), the Director and the Secretary, in order to provide students with increased access to rigorous courses of study in STEM, increase the number of students who are prepared for advanced study and careers in STEM, and increase the effective teaching of STEM subjects, shall at a minimum consider the following topics:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) Research on scalability, sustainability, and replication of successful STEM activities, programs, and models, in formal and informal environments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) Research that utilizes a systems approach to identifying challenges and opportunities to improve the teaching and learning of STEM, including development and evaluation of model systems that support improved teaching and learning of STEM across entire school districts and States, and encompassing and integrating the teaching and learning of STEM in formal and informal venues, and in K-12 schools and institutions of higher education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) Research to understand what makes a STEM teacher effective and pre-service and in-service STEM teacher training and professional development effective, including development of tools and methodologies to measure STEM teacher effectiveness.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) Research and development on cyber-enabled tools and programs and television based tools and programs for learning and teaching STEM, including development of tools and methodologies for assessing cyber and television enabled teaching and learning.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) Research and development on STEM teaching and learning in informal environments, including development of tools and methodologies for assessing STEM teaching and learning in informal environments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) Research and development on how integrating engineering with mathematics and science education may--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) improve student learning of mathematics and science;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) increase student interest and persistence in STEM; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) improve student understanding of engineering design principles and of the built world.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(7) Research to understand what makes hands-on, inquiry-based classroom experiences effective, including development of tools and methodologies for assessing such experiences.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Report to Congress- Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director and the Secretary shall report back to Congress with a description of--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) the grand challenges identified pursuant to this section;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) the role of each agency in supporting research and development activities to address the grand challenges;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) the common metrics that will be used to assess progress toward meeting the grand challenges;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) plans for periodically updating the grand challenges;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) how the agencies will disseminate the results of research and development activities carried out under this section to STEM education practitioners, to other Federal agencies that support STEM programs and activities, and to non-Federal funders of STEM education; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) how the agencies will support implementation of best practices identified by the research and development activities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 252. RESEARCH EXPERIENCES FOR UNDERGRADUATES.
(a) Research Sites- The Director shall award grants, on a merit-reviewed, competitive basis, to institutions of higher education, nonprofit organizations, or consortia of such institutions and organizations, for sites designated by the Director to provide research experiences for 6 or more undergraduate STEM students for sites designated at primarily undergraduate institutions of higher education and 10 or more undergraduate STEM students for all other sites, with consideration given to the goal of promoting the participation of individuals identified in section 33 or 34 of the Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act (
(1) at least half of the students participating in a program funded by a grant under this subsection at each site shall be recruited from institutions of higher education where research opportunities in STEM are limited, including 2-year institutions;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) the awards provide undergraduate research experiences in a wide range of STEM disciplines;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) the awards support a variety of projects, including independent investigator-led projects, interdisciplinary projects, and multi-institutional projects (including virtual projects);CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) students participating in each program funded have mentors, including during the academic year to the extent practicable, to help connect the students’ research experiences to the overall academic course of study and to help students achieve success in courses of study leading to a baccalaureate degree in a STEM field;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) mentors and students are supported with appropriate salary or stipends; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) student participants are tracked, for employment and continued matriculation in STEM fields, through receipt of the undergraduate degree and for at least 3 years thereafter.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Inclusion of Undergraduates in Standard Research Grants- The Director shall require that every recipient of a research grant from the Foundation proposing to include 1 or more students enrolled in certificate, associate, or baccalaureate degree programs in carrying out the research under the grant shall request support, including stipend support, for such undergraduate students as part of the research proposal itself rather than as a supplement to the research proposal, unless such undergraduate participation was not foreseeable at the time of the original proposal.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 253. LABORATORY SCIENCE PILOT PROGRAM.
Section 7026 of the America COMPETES Act (
SEC. 254. STEM INDUSTRY INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS.
(a) In General- The Director may award grants, on a competitive, merit-reviewed basis, to institutions of higher education, or consortia thereof, to establish or expand partnerships with local or regional private sector entities, for the purpose of providing undergraduate students with integrated internship experiences that connect private sector internship experiences with the students’ STEM coursework. Such partnerships may also include industry or professional associations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Priority- In awarding grants under this section, the Director shall give priority to institutions of higher education or consortia thereof that demonstrate significant outreach to and coordination with local or regional private sector entities in developing academic courses designed to provide students with the skills necessary for employment in local or regional companies.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Outreach to Rural Communities- The Foundation shall conduct outreach to institutions of higher education and private sector entities in rural areas to encourage those entities to participate in partnerships under this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Cost-Share- The Director shall require a 50 percent non-Federal cost-share from partnerships established or expanded under this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(e) Restriction- No Federal funds provided under this section may be used--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) for the purpose of providing stipends or compensation to students for private sector internships; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) as payment or reimbursement to private sector entities, except for institutions of higher education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(f) Report- Not less than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit a report to Congress on the number and total value of awards made under this section, the number of students affected by those awards, any evidence of the effect of those awards on workforce preparation and jobs placement for participating students, and an economic and ethnic breakdown of the participating students.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 255. TRIBAL COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES PROGRAM.
(a) In General- The Director shall continue to support a program to award grants on a competitive, merit-reviewed basis to tribal colleges and universities (as defined in section 316 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (
(b) Program Components- Grants awarded under this section shall support--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) activities to improve courses and curriculum in STEM;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) faculty development;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) stipends for undergraduate students participating in research; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) other activities consistent with subsection (a), as determined by the Director.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Instrumentation- Funding provided under this section may be used for instrumentation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 256. CYBER-ENABLED LEARNING FOR NATIONAL CHALLENGES.
The Director shall, in consultation with appropriate Federal agencies, identify ways to use cyber-enabled learning to create an innovative STEM workforce and to help retrain and retain our existing STEM workforce to address national challenges, including national security and competitiveness.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 257. SENSE OF CONGRESS.
It is the sense of Congress that retaining graduate-level talent trained at American universities in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields is critical to enhancing the competitiveness of American businesses.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE III--STEM EDUCATIONCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE III--STEM EDUCATIONCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 301. COORDINATION OF FEDERAL STEM EDUCATION.
(a) Short Title- This section may be cited as the ‘STEM Education Coordination Act of 2010’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Definition- In this section, the term ‘STEM’ means science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Establishment- The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall establish a committee under the National Science and Technology Council with the responsibility to coordinate Federal programs and activities in support of STEM education, including at the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Department of Education, and all other Federal agencies that have programs and activities in support of STEM education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Responsibilities of the Committee- The committee established under subsection (c) shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) coordinate the STEM education activities and programs of the Federal agencies;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) develop, implement through the participating agencies, and update once every 5 years a 5-year STEM education strategic plan, which shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) specify and prioritize annual and long-term objectives;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) specify the common metrics that will be used to assess progress toward achieving the objectives;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) describe the approaches that will be taken by each participating agency to assess the effectiveness of its STEM education programs and activities;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) with respect to subparagraph (A), describe the role of each agency in supporting programs and activities designed to achieve the objectives;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(E) describe the approaches that will be taken by each agency to increase the participation of underrepresented minority groups in STEM studies and careers both for programs specifically designed to broaden participation and for all programs in general, including by providing for programs and activities that increase participation by individuals in these groups at all institutions, and by increasing the engagement of Historically Black Colleges and Universities and minority-serving institutions in the STEM education and outreach activities supported by the agencies; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(F) describe the approaches that will be taken by each participating agency to conduct outreach designed to promote widespread public understanding of career opportunities in the STEM fields specific to the workforce needs of each agency, including outreach to women, Latinos, African-Americans, Native Americans, and other students from groups underrepresented in STEM;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) establish, periodically update, and maintain an inventory of federally sponsored STEM education programs and activities, including documentation of assessments of the effectiveness of such programs and activities and rates of participation by underrepresented minorities in such programs and activities; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) establish and maintain a publically accessible online database of all federally sponsored STEM education programs and activities at all levels and for all audiences, including students, teachers, and the general public.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(e) Responsibilities of OSTP- The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall encourage and monitor the efforts of the participating agencies to ensure that the strategic plan under subsection (d)(2) is developed and executed effectively and that the objectives of the strategic plan are met.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(f) Report- The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall transmit a report annually to Congress at the time of the President’s budget request describing the plan required under subsection (d)(2). The annual report shall include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) a description of the STEM education programs and activities for the previous and current fiscal years, and the proposed programs and activities under the President’s budget request, of each participating Federal agency;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) the levels of funding for each participating Federal agency for the programs and activities described under paragraph (1) for the previous fiscal year and under the President’s budget request;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) except for the initial annual report, a description of the progress made in carrying out the implementation plan, including a description of the outcome of any program assessments completed in the previous year, and any changes made to that plan since the previous annual report; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) a description of how the participating Federal agencies will disseminate information about federally supported resources for STEM education practitioners, including teacher professional development programs, to States and to STEM education practitioners, including to teachers and administrators in high-need schools, as defined in section 200 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (
SEC. 302. ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON STEM EDUCATION.
(a) In General- The President shall establish or designate an advisory committee on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Membership- The advisory committee established or designated by the President under subsection (a) shall be chaired by at least 2 members of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, with the remaining advisory committee membership consisting of non-Federal members who are specially qualified to provide the President with advice and information on STEM education. Membership of the advisory committee, at a minimum, shall include individuals from the following categories of individuals and organizations:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) Elementary school and secondary school administrator associations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) STEM educator professional associations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) Organizations that provide informal STEM education activities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) Institutions of higher education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) Scientific and engineering professional societies.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) Business and industry associations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(7) Foundations that fund STEM education activities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Responsibilities- The responsibilities of the advisory committee shall include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) soliciting input from teachers and administrators in both public and private schools, local educational agencies, States, and other public and private STEM education stakeholder groups for the purpose of informing the Federal agencies that support STEM education programs on the STEM education needs of States and school districts, including the unique needs of schools in rural areas;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) soliciting input from all STEM education stakeholder groups regarding STEM education programs, including STEM education research programs, supported by Federal agencies;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) providing advice to the Federal agencies, including through the interagency committee established under section 301, that support STEM education programs on how their programs can be better aligned with the needs of States and school districts as identified in paragraph (1), consistent with the mission of each agency;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) offering guidance to the President on current STEM education activities, research findings, and best practices, with the purpose of increasing connectivity between public and private STEM education efforts;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) providing advice to Federal agencies on how their STEM technical training and education programs can be better aligned with the workforce needs of States and regions; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) facilitating improved coordination between federally supported STEM education programs and activities and State level activities, including the efforts of P-16 and P-20 councils in the States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Definitions- For purposes of this section:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) P-16- The term ‘P-16’ refers to a system of education that encompasses preschool through undergraduate level education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) P-20- The term ‘P-20’ refers to a system of education that encompasses preschool through graduate level education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 303. STEM EDUCATION AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY.
(a) Definitions- Section 5002 of the America COMPETES Act (
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (4) as paragraphs (3) through (5), respectively; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) ENERGY SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING- The term ‘energy systems science and engineering’ means--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(A) nuclear science and engineering, including--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(i) nuclear engineering;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(ii) nuclear chemistry;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(iii) radiochemistry; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(iv) health physics;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(B) hydrocarbon system science and engineering, including--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(i) petroleum or reservoir engineering;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(ii) environmental geoscience;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(iii) petrophysics;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(iv) geophysics;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(v) geochemistry;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(vi) petroleum geology;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(vii) ocean engineering;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(viii) environmental engineering; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(ix) carbon capture and sequestration science and engineering;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(C) energy efficiency and renewable energy technology systems science and engineering, including with respect to--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(i) solar technology systems;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(ii) wind technology systems;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(iii) buildings technology systems;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(iv) transportation technology systems;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(v) hydropower systems;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(vi) marine and hydrokinetic technology systems;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(vii) geothermal systems; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(viii) biomass technology systems; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(D) energy storage and distribution systems science and engineering, including with respect to--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(i) energy storage; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(ii) energy delivery.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education Programs- Subpart B of the Department of Energy Science Education Enhancement Act (
(1) in section 3170--CommentsClose Comments