The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowH.R.59 - Ex-Offenders Voting Rights Act of 2009
To secure the Federal voting rights of certain qualified ex-offenders who have served their sentences.

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HR 59 IHCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
111th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
1st SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
H. R. 59CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To secure the Federal voting rights of certain qualified ex-offenders who have served their sentences.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
January 6, 2009CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
January 6, 2009CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the JudiciaryCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To secure the Federal voting rights of certain qualified ex-offenders who have served their sentences.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘Ex-Offenders Voting Rights Act of 2009’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.
(a) Findings- Congress makes the following findings:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) The right to vote is the most basic constitutive act of citizenship and regaining the right to vote reintegrates offenders into free society. The right to vote may not be abridged or denied by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, gender, or previous condition of servitude. Basic constitutional principles of fairness and equal protection require an equal opportunity for United States citizens to vote in Federal elections.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) Since the founding of the Nation, most States have enacted laws disenfranchising convicted felons and ex-felons. In the last 30 years, due to the dramatic expansion of the criminal justice system, these laws have significantly affected the political voice of many American communities. The momentum toward reform of these policies has been based on a reconsideration of their wisdom in meeting legitimate correctional objectives and the interests of full democratic participation. Forty-eight States and the District of Columbia prohibit inmates from voting while incarcerated for a felony offense.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) Congress has ultimate supervisory power over Federal elections, an authority that has repeatedly been upheld by the Supreme Court.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) Although State laws determine the qualifications for voting in Federal elections, Congress must ensure that those laws are in accordance with the Constitution. Currently, those laws vary throughout the Nation, resulting in discrepancies regarding which citizens may vote in Federal elections.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) Only two States (Maine and Vermont) permit inmates to vote. Thirty-five States prohibit felons from voting while they are on parole and 30 of these States exclude felony probationers as well. Two States deny the right to vote to all ex-offenders who have completed their sentences. Nine others disenfranchise certain categories of ex-offenders or permit application for restoration of rights for specified offenses after a waiting period (e.g., 5 years in Delaware and Wyoming, and 2 years in Nebraska). Each State has developed its own process of restoring voting rights to ex-offenders but most of these restoration processes are so cumbersome that few ex-offenders are able to take advantage of them.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) An estimated 5,300,000 million Americans, or one in 41 adults, have currently or permanently lost their voting rights as a result of a felony conviction.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(7) State disenfranchisement laws disproportionately impact ethnic minorities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(8) Thirteen States disenfranchise some or all ex-offenders who have fully served their sentences, regardless of the nature or seriousness of the offense.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(9) In those States that disenfranchise ex-offenders who have fully served their sentences, the right to vote can be regained in theory, but in practice this possibility is often illusory.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(10) In eight States, a pardon or order from the Governor is required for an ex-offender to regain the right to vote. In two States, ex-offenders must obtain action by the parole or pardon board to regain that right.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(11) Offenders convicted of a Federal offense often have additional barriers to regaining voting rights. In at least 16 States, Federal ex-offenders cannot use the State procedure for restoring their voting rights. The only method provided by Federal law for restoring voting rights to ex-offenders is a Presidential pardon.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(12) Few persons who seek to have their right to vote restored have the financial and political resources needed to succeed.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(13) Thirteen percent of the African-American adult male population, or 1,400,000 African-American men, are disenfranchised. Given current rates of incarceration, 3 in 10 African-American men in the next generation will be disenfranchised at some point during their lifetimes. Hispanic citizens are also disproportionately disenfranchised, since those citizens are disproportionately represented in the criminal justice system.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(14) An estimated 676,730 women are currently ineligible to vote as a result of a felony conviction. More than 2,000,000 White Americans (Hispanic and non-Hispanic) are disenfranchised as a result of a felony conviction. In five States that deny the vote to ex-offenders, one in four Black men are permanently disenfranchised.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(15) Given current rates of incarceration, 3 in 10 of the next generation of Black men can expect to be disenfranchised at some point in their lifetime. In States that disenfranchise ex-offenders, as many as 40 percent of Black men may permanently lose their right to vote. Two million one hundred thousand disenfranchised persons are ex-offenders who have completed their sentences.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(16) The discrepancies described in this subsection should be addressed by Congress, in the name of fundamental fairness and equal protection.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Purpose- The purpose of this Act is to restore fairness in the Federal election process by ensuring that ex-offenders who have fully served their sentences are not denied the right to vote.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 3. RIGHTS OF CITIZENS.
(a) Protecting Right To Vote in Federal Elections- The right of an individual who is a citizen of the United States to vote in any election for Federal office shall not be denied or abridged because that individual has been convicted of a criminal offense unless, at the time of the election, such individual is serving a felony sentence in a correctional institution or facility.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Definitions- In this Act:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION OR FACILITY- The term ‘correctional institution or facility’ means any prison, penitentiary, jail, or other institution or facility for the confinement of individuals convicted of criminal offenses, whether publicly or privately operated, except that such term does not include any residential community treatment center (or similar public or private facility).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) ELECTION- The term ‘election’ means--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) a general, special, primary, or runoff election;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) a convention or caucus of a political party held to nominate a candidate;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) a primary election held for the selection of delegates to a national nominating convention of a political party; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) a primary election held for the expression of a preference for the nomination of persons for election to the office of President.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) FEDERAL OFFICE- The term ‘Federal office’ means the office of President or Vice President, or of Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, Congress.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 4. NOTIFYING INDIVIDUALS WHO REGAIN RIGHT TO VOTE.
(a) Requiring Notification-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- The Chief State correctional officer of each State shall ensure that, not later than 30 days after an individual who is serving a felony sentence in a correctional institution or facility in the State is released from the institution or facility, including an individual who is released on parole or probation, the individual is notified of the individual’s right to vote in elections for Federal office and of the date of the next such election in which the individual may vote.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) EXCEPTION FOR INDIVIDUALS CONTINUING TO SERVE SENTENCES- Paragraph (1) does not apply in the case of an individual who is released from a correctional institution or facility to serve a felony sentence in a different correctional institution or facility.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) DEFINITIONS- In this subsection--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) the term ‘parole’ means parole (including mandatory parole) or conditional or supervised release (including mandatory supervised release) which is imposed by a Federal, State, or local court; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) the term ‘probation’ means probation imposed by a Federal, State, or local court with or without a condition on the individual involved concerning--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) the individual’s freedom of movement,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) the payment of damages by the individual,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iii) periodic reporting by the individual to an officer of the court, orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iv) supervision of the individual by an officer of the court.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Application to Individuals Released From Federal Institutions or Facilities- Subsection (a) shall apply to the Director of the Bureau of Prisons with respect to individuals released from an institution or facility under the Director’s jurisdiction in the same manner as such subsection applies to the Chief State correctional officer of a State with respect to individuals released from institutions or facilities in that State.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT.
(a) Attorney General- The Attorney General may bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such declaratory or injunctive relief as is necessary to remedy a violation of this Act.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Private Right of Action-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) NOTICE- A person who is aggrieved by a violation of this Act may provide written notice of the violation to the chief election official of the State involved.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) ACTION- Except as provided in paragraph (3), if the violation is not corrected within 90 days after receipt of a notice provided under paragraph (1), or within 20 days after receipt of the notice if the violation occurred within 120 days before the date of an election for Federal office, the aggrieved person may bring a civil action in such a court to obtain the declaratory or injunctive relief with respect to the violation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) ACTION FOR VIOLATION SHORTLY BEFORE A FEDERAL ELECTION- If the violation occurred within 30 days before the date of an election for Federal office, the aggrieved person shall not be required to provide notice to the chief election official of the State under paragraph (1) before bringing a civil action in such a court to obtain the declaratory or injunctive relief with respect to the violation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 6. RELATION TO OTHER LAWS.
(a) No Prohibition on Less Restrictive Laws- Nothing in this Act shall be construed to prohibit a State from enacting any State law that affords the right to vote in any election for Federal office on terms less restrictive than those terms established by this Act.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) No Limitation on Other Laws- The rights and remedies established by this Act shall be in addition to all other rights and remedies provided by law, and shall not supersede, restrict, or limit the application of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
Top-Rated Comments
- “I see she is looking to get reelected by the criminal vote. ” Railroad67
- “There are enough criminals in government already voting!” skip292
Recent OC Blog Articles
- Yes, let's stride towards an open VCS for legislation (or, GitHub for laws on OC) May 23, 2012
- Contact Congress Today to #FreeTHOMAS May 17, 2012
- Yochai Benkler: Blueprint for Democratic Participation May 10, 2012
- New NDAA Would Give the Military Clandestine Cyberwar Powers May 08, 2012
- The Week Ahead in Congress May 07, 2012

U.S. Congress - Text of H.R.59 as Introduced in House Ex-Offenders Voting Rights Act of 2009



