The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowH.R.628 - To establish a pilot program in certain United States district courts to encourage enhancement of expertise in patent cases among district judges.
| Version | Word Count | Changes From Previous Version | Percent Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced in House | 1,152 | n/a | n/a |
| Engrossed in House | 1,149 | 3 | 11% |
| Referred in Senate | 1,138 | 7 | 7% |
| Engrossed Amendment Senate | 1,095 | 28 | 27% |
| Enrolled Bill | 1,084 | 9 Show Changes Hide Changes | 10% |
Key: changed or removed text inserted or modified text

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HR 628 EAS In the Senate of the United States, December 13, 2010.
One Hundred Eleventh CongressCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
of theCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
United States of AmericaCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
AT THE SECOND SESSIONCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
the fifth day of January, two thousand and tenCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
An ActCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To establish a pilot program in certain United States district courts to encourage enhancement of expertise in patent cases among district judges.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
’, do pass with the following AMENDMENT: Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the following:
SECTION 1. PILOT PROGRAM IN CERTAIN DISTRICT COURTS.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. PILOT PROGRAM IN CERTAIN DISTRICT COURTS.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(a) Establishment-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- There is established a program, in each of the United States district courts designated under subsection (b), under which--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) those district judges of that district court who request to hear cases under which 1 or more issues arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents or plant variety protection are required to be decided, are designated by the chief judge of the court to hear those cases;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) cases described in subparagraph (A) are randomly assigned to the judges of the district court, regardless of whether the judges are designated under subparagraph (A);CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) a judge not designated under subparagraph (A) to whom a case is assigned under subparagraph (B) may decline to accept the case; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) a case declined under subparagraph (C) is randomly reassigned to 1 of those judges of the court designated under subparagraph (A).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) SENIOR JUDGES- Senior judges of a district court may be designated under paragraph (1)(A) if at least 1 judge of the court in regular active service is also so designated.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) RIGHT TO TRANSFER CASES PRESERVED- This section shall not be construed to limit the ability of a judge to request the reassignment of or otherwise transfer a case to which the judge is assigned under this section, in accordance with otherwise applicable rules of the court.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Designation-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- Not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts shall designate not less than 6 United States district courts, in at least 3 different judicial circuits, in which the program established under subsection (a) will be carried out.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATIONS-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) IN GENERAL- The Director shall make designations under paragraph (1) from--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) the 15 district courts in which the largest number of patent and plant variety protection cases were filed in the most recent calendar year that has ended; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) the district courts that have adopted, or certified to the Director the intention to adopt, local rules for patent and plant variety protection cases.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) SELECTION OF COURTS- From amongst the district courts that satisfy the criteria for designation under this subsection, the Director shall select--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) 3 district courts that each have at least 10 district judges authorized to be appointed by the President, whether under
(ii) 3 district courts that each have fewer than 10 district judges authorized to be appointed by the President, whether under
(c) Duration- The program established under subsection (a) shall terminate 10 years after the end of the 6-month period described in subsection (b).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Applicability- The program established under subsection (a) shall apply in a district court designated under subsection (b) only to cases commenced on or after the date of such designation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(e) Reports to Congress-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- At the times specified in paragraph (2), the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, in consultation with the chief judge of each of the district courts designated under subsection (b) and the Director of the Federal Judicial Center, shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate a report on the pilot program established under subsection (a). The report shall include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) an analysis of the extent to which the program has succeeded in developing expertise in patent and plant variety protection cases among the district judges of the district courts so designated;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) an analysis of the extent to which the program has improved the efficiency of the courts involved by reason of such expertise;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) with respect to patent cases handled by the judges designated pursuant to subsection (a)(1)(A) and judges not so designated, a comparison between the 2 groups of judges with respect to--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) the rate of reversal by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, of such cases on the issues of claim construction and substantive patent law; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) the period of time elapsed from the date on which a case is filed to the date on which trial begins or summary judgment is entered;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) a discussion of any evidence indicating that litigants select certain of the judicial districts designated under subsection (b) in an attempt to ensure a given outcome; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(E) an analysis of whether the pilot program should be extended to other district courts, or should be made permanent and apply to all district courts.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) TIMETABLE FOR REPORTS- The times referred to in paragraph (1) are--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) not later than the date that is 5 years and 3 months after the end of the 6-month period described in subsection (b); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) not later than 5 years after the date described in subparagraph (A).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) PERIODIC REPORTS- The Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, in consultation with the chief judge of each of the district courts designated under subsection (b) and the Director of the Federal Judicial Center, shall keep the committees referred to in paragraph (1) informed, on a periodic basis while the pilot program is in effect, with respect to the matters referred to in subparagraphs (A) through (E) of paragraph (1).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Attest: Secretary. 111th CONGRESS 2d Session H.R. 628 AMENDMENT
Vice President of the United States andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
President of the Senate.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
OC Blog Articles Related To This Bill
Recent OC Blog Articles
- Yes, let's stride towards an open VCS for legislation (or, GitHub for laws on OC) May 23, 2012
- Contact Congress Today to #FreeTHOMAS May 17, 2012
- Yochai Benkler: Blueprint for Democratic Participation May 10, 2012
- New NDAA Would Give the Military Clandestine Cyberwar Powers May 08, 2012
- The Week Ahead in Congress May 07, 2012

U.S. Congress - Text of H.R.628 as Enrolled Bill To establish a pilot program in certain United States district courts to encourage enha...



