The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowH.R.6520 - Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010
To provide for the repeal of the Department of Defense policy concerning homosexuality in the Armed Forces known as "Don't Ask, Don't Tell".

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HR 6520 IHCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
111th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
2d SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
H. R. 6520CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To provide for the repeal of the Department of Defense policy concerning homosexuality in the Armed Forces known as ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
December 14, 2010CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
December 14, 2010CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Mr. PATRICK J. MURPHY of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. HOYER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed ServicesCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To provide for the repeal of the Department of Defense policy concerning homosexuality in the Armed Forces known as ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Act of 2010’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE POLICY CONCERNING HOMOSEXUALITY IN THE ARMED FORCES.
(a) Comprehensive Review on the Implementation of a Repeal of
(1) IN GENERAL- On March 2, 2010, the Secretary of Defense issued a memorandum directing the Comprehensive Review on the Implementation of a Repeal of
(2) OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF REVIEW- The Terms of Reference accompanying the Secretary’s memorandum established the following objectives and scope of the ordered review:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) Determine any impacts to military readiness, military effectiveness and unit cohesion, recruiting/retention, and family readiness that may result from repeal of the law and recommend any actions that should be taken in light of such impacts.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) Determine leadership, guidance, and training on standards of conduct and new policies.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) Determine appropriate changes to existing policies and regulations, including but not limited to issues regarding personnel management, leadership and training, facilities, investigations, and benefits.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) Recommend appropriate changes (if any) to the Uniform Code of Military Justice.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(E) Monitor and evaluate existing legislative proposals to repeal
(F) Assure appropriate ways to monitor the workforce climate and military effectiveness that support successful follow-through on implementation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(G) Evaluate the issues raised in ongoing litigation involving
(b) Effective Date- The amendments made by subsection (f) shall take effect 60 days after the date on which the last of the following occurs:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) The Secretary of Defense has received the report required by the memorandum of the Secretary referred to in subsection (a).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) The President transmits to the congressional defense committees a written certification, signed by the President, the Secretary of Defense, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, stating each of the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) That the President, the Secretary of Defense, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff have considered the recommendations contained in the report and the report’s proposed plan of action.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) That the Department of Defense has prepared the necessary policies and regulations to exercise the discretion provided by the amendments made by subsection (f).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) That the implementation of necessary policies and regulations pursuant to the discretion provided by the amendments made by subsection (f) is consistent with the standards of military readiness, military effectiveness, unit cohesion, and recruiting and retention of the Armed Forces.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) No Immediate Effect on Current Policy-
(d) Benefits- Nothing in this section, or the amendments made by this section, shall be construed to require the furnishing of benefits in violation of
(e) No Private Cause of Action- Nothing in this section, or the amendments made by this section, shall be construed to create a private cause of action.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(f) Treatment of 1993 Policy-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) TITLE 10- Upon the effective date established by subsection (b), chapter 37 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) by striking section 654; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) in the table of sections at the beginning of such chapter, by striking the item relating to section 654.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT- Upon the effective date established by subsection (b), section 571 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
OC Blog Articles Related To This Bill
- Secrecy Concerns in the Defense Bill Aug 17, 2011
- The Color (and Gender) of Congress Feb 01, 2011
- "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Repeal Threatened by Controversial Jet Engine Program Jun 01, 2010
- One More War Supplemental, Please Mar 29, 2010
- Senate Votes to Cut Off Defense Contractors That Try to Cover Up Rape Oct 08, 2009

U.S. Congress - Text of H.R.6520 as Introduced in House Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010



