The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowH.R.6523 - Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2011 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.
| Version | Word Count | Changes From Previous Version | Percent Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced in House | 174,815 | n/a | n/a |
| Engrossed in House | 175,680 | 59 | 0% |
| Placed on Calendar Senate | 174,860 | 8 | 0% |
| Engrossed Amendment Senate | 97 | 53 Show Changes Hide Changes | 99% |
Key: changed or removed text inserted or modified text

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HR 6523 PCS Calendar No. 717 111th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 6523 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES December 17, 2010 Received December 19, 2010 Read twice and placed on the calendar AN ACT To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2011 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, (a) Short Title- This Act may be cited as the ‘Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011’. (b) References- Any reference in this or any other Act to the ‘National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011’ shall be deemed to refer to the ‘Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011’. (a) Divisions- This Act is organized into three divisions as follows: (1) Division A--Department of Defense Authorizations. (2) Division B--Military Construction Authorizations. (3) Division C--Department of Energy National Security Authorizations and Other Authorizations. (b) Table of Contents- The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title. Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents. Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees. Sec. 101. Army. Sec. 102. Navy and Marine Corps. Sec. 103. Air Force. Sec. 104. Defense-wide activities. Sec. 111. Multiyear funding for detail design and construction of LHA Replacement ship designated LHA-7. Sec. 112. Requirement to maintain Navy airborne signals intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities. Sec. 113. Report on naval force structure and missile defense. Sec. 114. Reports on service-life extension of F/A-18 aircraft by the Department of the Navy. Sec. 121. Limitations on biometric systems funds. Sec. 122. System management plan and matrix for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft program. Sec. 123. Quarterly reports on use of Combat Mission Requirements funds. Sec. 124. Counter-improvised explosive device initiatives database. Sec. 125. Study on lightweight body armor solutions. Sec. 126. Integration of solid state laser systems into certain aircraft. Sec. 127. Contracts for commercial imaging satellite capacities. Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations. Sec. 211. Enhancement of Department of Defense support of science, mathematics, and engineering education. Sec. 212. Limitation on use of funds by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency for operation of National Cyber Range. Sec. 213. Separate program elements required for research and development of Joint Light Tactical Vehicle. Sec. 214. Program for research, development, and deployment of advanced ground vehicles, ground vehicle systems, and components. Sec. 215. Demonstration and pilot projects on cybersecurity. Sec. 221. Sense of Congress on ballistic missile defense. Sec. 222. Repeal of prohibition of certain contracts by Missile Defense Agency with foreign entities. Sec. 223. Limitation on availability of funds for missile defense interceptors in Europe. Sec. 224. Medium Extended Air Defense System. Sec. 225. Acquisition accountability reports on the ballistic missile defense system. Sec. 226. Authority to support ballistic missile shared early warning with the Czech Republic. Sec. 227. Report on phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe. Sec. 228. Independent review and assessment of the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system. Sec. 229. Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program. Sec. 231. Report on analysis of alternatives and program requirements for the Ground Combat Vehicle program. Sec. 232. Cost benefit analysis of future tank-fired munitions. Sec. 233. Annual Comptroller General report on the VH-(XX) presidential helicopter acquisition program. Sec. 241. Sense of Congress affirming the importance of Department of Defense participation in development of next generation semiconductor technologies. Sec. 242. Pilot program on collaborative energy security. Sec. 243. Pilot program to include technology protection features during research and development of defense systems. Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding. Sec. 311. Reimbursement of Environmental Protection Agency for certain costs in connection with the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant, Minnesota. Sec. 312. Payment to Environmental Protection Agency of stipulated penalties in connection with Naval Air Station, Brunswick, Maine. Sec. 313. Requirements related to the investigation of exposure to drinking water at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. Sec. 314. Comptroller General assessment on military environmental exposures. Sec. 321. Technical amendments to requirement for service contract inventory. Sec. 322. Repeal of conditions on expansion of functions performed under prime vendor contracts for depot-level maintenance and repair. Sec. 323. Prohibition on establishing goals or quotas for conversion of functions to performance by Department of Defense civilian employees. Sec. 331. Additional reporting requirements relating to corrosion prevention projects and activities. Sec. 332. Modification and repeal of certain reporting requirements. Sec. 333. Report on Air Sovereignty Alert mission. Sec. 334. Report on the SEAD/DEAD mission requirement for the Air Force. Sec. 335. Requirement to update study on strategic seaports. Sec. 341. Permanent authority to accept and use landing fees charged for use of domestic military airfields by civil aircraft. Sec. 342. Extension of Arsenal Support Program Initiative. Sec. 343. Limitation on obligation of funds for the Army Human Terrain System. Sec. 344. Limitation on obligation of funds pending submission of classified justification material. Sec. 345. Requirements for transferring aircraft within the Air Force inventory. Sec. 346. Commercial sale of small arms ammunition in excess of military requirements. Sec. 351. Expedited processing of background investigations for certain individuals. Sec. 352. Revision to authorities relating to transportation of civilian passengers and commercial cargoes by Department of Defense when space unavailable on commercial lines. Sec. 353. Technical correction to obsolete reference relating to use of flexible hiring authority to facilitate performance of certain Department of Defense functions by civilian employees. Sec. 354. Authority for payment of full replacement value for loss or damage to household goods in limited cases not covered by carrier liability. Sec. 355. Recovery of improperly disposed of Department of Defense property. Sec. 356. Operational readiness models. Sec. 357. Sense of Congress regarding continued importance of High-Altitude Aviation Training Site, Colorado. Sec. 358. Study of effects of new construction of obstructions on military installations and operations. Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces. Sec. 402. Revision in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels. Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve. Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the Reserves. Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status). Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2011 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians. Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support. Sec. 421. Military personnel. Sec. 501. Ages for appointment and mandatory retirement for health professions officers. Sec. 502. Authority for appointment of warrant officers in the grade of W-1 by commission and standardization of warrant officer appointing authority. Sec. 503. Nondisclosure of information from discussions, deliberations, notes, and records of special selection boards. Sec. 504. Administrative removal of officers from promotion list. Sec. 505. Modification of authority for officers selected for appointment to general and flag officer grades to wear insignia of higher grade before appointment. Sec. 506. Temporary authority to reduce minimum length of active service as a commissioned officer required for voluntary retirement as an officer. Sec. 511. Removal of statutory distribution limits on Navy reserve flag officer allocation. Sec. 512. Assignment of Air Force Reserve military technicians (dual status) to positions outside Air Force Reserve unit program. Sec. 513. Temporary authority for temporary employment of non-dual status military technicians. Sec. 514. Revision of structure and functions of the Reserve Forces Policy Board. Sec. 515. Repeal of requirement for new oath when officer transfers from active-duty list to reserve active-status list. Sec. 516. Leave of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces. Sec. 517. Direct appointment of graduates of the United States Merchant Marine Academy into the National Guard. Sec. 521. Technical revisions to definition of joint matters for purposes of joint officer management. Sec. 522. Modification of promotion board procedures for joint qualified officers and officers with Joint Staff experience. Sec. 531. Extension of temporary authority to order retired members of the Armed Forces to active duty in high-demand, low-density assignments. Sec. 532. Non-chargeable rest and recuperation absence for certain members undergoing extended deployment to a combat zone. Sec. 533. Correction of military records. Sec. 534. Disposition of members found to be fit for duty who are not suitable for deployment or worldwide assignment for medical reasons. Sec. 535. Review of laws, policies, and regulations restricting service of female members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 541. Continuation of warrant officers on active duty to complete disciplinary action. Sec. 542. Enhanced authority to punish contempt in military justice proceedings. Sec. 543. Improvements to Department of Defense domestic violence programs. Sec. 551. Enhancements of Department of Defense undergraduate nurse training program. Sec. 552. Repayment of education loan repayment benefits. Sec. 553. Participation of Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship and Financial Assistance Program recipients in active duty health profession loan repayment program. Sec. 554. Active duty obligation for military academy graduates who participate in the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship and Financial Assistance program. Sec. 561. Enrollment of dependents of members of the Armed Forces who reside in temporary housing in Department of Defense domestic dependent elementary and secondary schools. Sec. 562. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees. Sec. 563. Impact aid for children with severe disabilities. Sec. 571. Clarification of persons eligible for award of bronze star medal. Sec. 572. Authorization and request for award of Distinguished-Service Cross to Shinyei Matayoshi for acts of valor during World War II. Sec. 573. Authorization and request for award of Distinguished-Service Cross to Jay C. Copley for acts of valor during the Vietnam War. Sec. 574. Program to commemorate 60th anniversary of the Korean War. Sec. 581. Appointment of additional members of Department of Defense Military Family Readiness Council. Sec. 582. Enhancement of community support for military families with special needs. Sec. 583. Modification of Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program. Sec. 584. Expansion and continuation of Joint Family Support Assistance Program. Sec. 585. Report on military spouse education programs. Sec. 586. Report on enhancing benefits available for military dependent children with special education needs. Sec. 587. Reports on child development centers and financial assistance for child care for members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 591. Authority for members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense and Coast Guard civilian employees and their families to accept gifts from non-Federal entities. Sec. 592. Increase in number of private sector civilians authorized for admission to National Defense University. Sec. 593. Admission of defense industry civilians to attend United States Air Force Institute of Technology. Sec. 594. Updated terminology for Army Medical Service Corps. Sec. 595. Date for submission of annual report on Department of Defense STARBASE Program. Sec. 596. Extension of deadline for submission of final report of Military Leadership Diversity Commission. Sec. 601. Ineligibility of certain Federal civilian employees for Reservist income replacement payments on account of availability of comparable benefits under another program. Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve forces. Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health care professionals. Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers. Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities. Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays. Sec. 616. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of referral bonuses. Sec. 621. Extension of authority to provide travel and transportation allowances for inactive duty training outside of normal commuting distances. Sec. 622. Travel and transportation allowances for attendance at Yellow Ribbon Reintegration events. Sec. 631. Elimination of cap on retired pay multiplier for members with greater than 30 years of service who retire for disability. Sec. 632. Payment date for retired and retainer pay. Sec. 633. Clarification of effect of ordering reserve component member to active duty to receive authorized medical care on reducing eligibility age for receipt of non-regular service retired pay. Sec. 634. Conformity of special compensation for members with injuries or illnesses requiring assistance in everyday living with monthly personal caregiver stipend under Department of Veterans Affairs program of comprehensive assistance for family caregivers. Sec. 635. Sense of Congress concerning age and service requirements for retired pay for non-regular service. Sec. 641. Addition of definition of morale, welfare, and recreation telephone services for use in contracts to provide such services for military personnel serving in combat zones. Sec. 642. Feasibility study on establishment of full exchange store in the Northern Mariana Islands. Sec. 643. Continuation of commissary and exchange operations at Brunswick Naval Air Station, Maine. Sec. 651. Report on basic allowance for housing for personnel assigned to sea duty. Sec. 652. Report on savings from enhanced management of special pay for aviation career officers extending period of active duty. Sec. 701. Extension of prohibition on increases in certain health care costs. Sec. 702. Extension of dependent coverage under the TRICARE program. Sec. 703. Survivor dental benefits. Sec. 704. Aural screenings for members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 705. Temporary prohibition on increase in copayments under retail pharmacy system of pharmacy benefits program. Sec. 711. Administration of TRICARE. Sec. 712. Postdeployment health reassessments for purposes of the medical tracking system for members of the Armed Forces deployed overseas. Sec. 713. Clarification of licensure requirements applicable to military health-care professionals who are members of the National Guard performing certain duty while in State status. Sec. 714. Improvements to oversight of medical training for Medical Corps officers. Sec. 715. Health information technology. Sec. 716. Education and training on use of pharmaceuticals in rehabilitation programs for wounded warriors. Sec. 721. Repeal of report requirement on separations resulting from refusal to participate in anthrax vaccine immunization program. Sec. 722. Comprehensive policy on consistent neurological cognitive assessments of members of the Armed Forces before and after deployment. Sec. 723. Assessment of post-traumatic stress disorder by military occupation. Sec. 724. Licensed mental health counselors and the TRICARE program. Sec. 801. Disclosure to litigation support contractors. Sec. 802. Designation of engine development and procurement program as major subprogram. Sec. 803. Enhancement of Department of Defense authority to respond to combat and safety emergencies through rapid acquisition and deployment of urgently needed supplies. Sec. 804. Review of acquisition process for rapid fielding of capabilities in response to urgent operational needs. Sec. 805. Acquisition of major automated information system programs. Sec. 806. Requirements for information relating to supply chain risk. Sec. 811. Cost estimates for program baselines and contract negotiations for major defense acquisition and major automated information system programs. Sec. 812. Management of manufacturing risk in major defense acquisition programs. Sec. 813. Modification and extension of requirements of the Weapon System Acquisition Reform Act of 2009. Sec. 814. Inclusion of major subprograms to major defense acquisition programs under various acquisition-related requirements. Sec. 821. Provisions relating to fire resistant fiber for production of military uniforms. Sec. 822. Repeal of requirement for certain procurements from firms in the small arms production industrial base. Sec. 823. Review of regulatory definition relating to production of specialty metals. Sec. 824. Guidance relating to rights in technical data. Sec. 825. Extension of sunset date for certain protests of task and delivery order contracts. Sec. 826. Inclusion of option amounts in limitations on authority of the Department of Defense to carry out certain prototype projects. Sec. 827. Permanent authority for Defense Acquisition Challenge Program; pilot expansion of Program. Sec. 828. Energy savings performance contracts. Sec. 829. Definition of materials critical to national security. Sec. 831. Oversight and accountability of contractors performing private security functions in areas of combat operations. Sec. 832. Extension of regulations on contractors performing private security functions to areas of other significant military operations. Sec. 833. Standards and certification for private security contractors. Sec. 834. Enhancements of authority of Secretary of Defense to reduce or deny award fees to companies found to jeopardize the health or safety of Government personnel. Sec. 835. Annual joint report and Comptroller General review on contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Sec. 841. Improvements to structure and functioning of Joint Requirements Oversight Council. Sec. 842. Department of Defense policy on acquisition and performance of sustainable products and services. Sec. 843. Assessment and plan for critical rare earth materials in defense applications. Sec. 844. Review of national security exception to competition. Sec. 845. Requirement for entities with facility clearances that are not under foreign ownership control or influence mitigation. Sec. 846. Procurement of photovoltaic devices. Sec. 847. Non-availability exception from Buy American requirements for procurement of hand or measuring tools. Sec. 848. Contractor logistics support of contingency operations. Sec. 860. Short title. Sec. 861. Improvements to the management of the defense acquisition system. Sec. 862. Comptroller General report on Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System. Sec. 863. Requirements for the acquisition of services. Sec. 864. Review of defense acquisition guidance. Sec. 865. Requirement to review references to services acquisition throughout the Federal Acquisition Regulation and the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement.
December 22, 2010.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Pilot program on acquisition of military purpose nondevelopmental items.Part II--Defense Acquisition Workforce Sec. 871. Acquisition workforce excellence. Sec. 872. Amendments to the acquisition workforce demonstration project. Sec. 873. Career development for civilian and military personnel in the acquisition workforce. Sec. 874. Recertification and training requirements. Sec. 875. Information technology acquisition workforce. Sec. 876. Definition of acquisition workforce. Sec. 877. Defense Acquisition University curriculum review. Sec. 881. Audit readiness of financial statements of the Department of Defense. Sec. 882. Review of obligation and expenditure thresholds. Sec. 883. Disclosure and traceability of the cost of Department of Defense health care contracts. Sec. 891. Expansion of the industrial base. Sec. 892. Price trend analysis for supplies and equipment purchased by the Department of Defense. Sec. 893. Contractor business systems. Sec. 894. Review and recommendations on eliminating barriers to contracting with the Department of Defense. Sec. 895. Inclusion of the providers of services and information technology in the national technology and industrial base. Sec. 896. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy; Industrial Base Fund. Sec. 901. Reorganization of Office of the Secretary of Defense to carry out reduction required by law in number of Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense. Sec. 911. Integrated space architectures. Sec. 912. Limitation on use of funds for costs of terminating contracts under the National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System Program. Sec. 913. Limitation on use of funds for purchasing Global Positioning System user equipment. Sec. 914. Plan for integration of space-based nuclear detection sensors. Sec. 915. Preservation of the solid rocket motor industrial base. Sec. 916. Implementation plan to sustain solid rocket motor industrial base. Sec. 917. Review and plan on sustainment of liquid rocket propulsion systems industrial base. Sec. 921. Five-year extension of authority for Secretary of Defense to engage in commercial activities as security for intelligence collection activities. Sec. 922. Modification of attendees at proceedings of Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Integration Council. Sec. 923. Report on Department of Defense interservice management and coordination of remotely piloted aircraft support of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. Sec. 924. Report on requirements fulfillment and personnel management relating to Air Force intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance provided by remotely piloted aircraft. Sec. 931. Continuous monitoring of Department of Defense information systems for cybersecurity. Sec. 932. Strategy on computer software assurance. Sec. 933. Strategy for acquisition and oversight of Department of Defense cyber warfare capabilities. Sec. 934. Report on the cyber warfare policy of the Department of Defense. Sec. 935. Reports on Department of Defense progress in defending the Department and the defense industrial base from cyber events. Sec. 941. Two-year extension of authorities relating to temporary waiver of reimbursement of costs of activities for nongovernmental personnel at Department of Defense Regional Centers for Security Studies. Sec. 942. Additional requirements for quadrennial roles and missions review in 2011. Sec. 943. Report on organizational structure and policy guidance of the Department of Defense regarding information operations. Sec. 944. Report on organizational structures of the geographic combatant command headquarters. Sec. 1001. General transfer authority. Sec. 1002. Authorization of additional appropriations for operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Haiti for fiscal year 2010. Sec. 1003. Budgetary effects of this Act. Sec. 1011. Unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia. Sec. 1012. Extension and modification of joint task forces support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities. Sec. 1013. Reporting requirement on expenditures to support foreign counter-drug activities. Sec. 1014. Support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments. Sec. 1015. Notice to Congress on military construction projects for facilities of the Department of Defense and foreign law enforcement agencies for counter-drug activities. Sec. 1021. Extension of authority for reimbursement of expenses for certain Navy mess operations. Sec. 1022. Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the naming of a naval combat vessel after Father Vincent Capodanno. Sec. 1023. Requirements for long-range plan for construction of naval vessels. Sec. 1031. Extension of certain authority for making rewards for combating terrorism. Sec. 1032. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Sec. 1033. Certification requirements relating to the transfer of individuals detained at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to foreign countries and other foreign entities. Sec. 1034. Prohibition on the use of funds to modify or construct facilities in the United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Sec. 1035. Comprehensive review of force protection policies. Sec. 1041. Limitation on deactivation of existing Consequence Management Response Forces. Sec. 1051. Interagency national security knowledge and skills. Sec. 1052. Report on establishing a Northeast Regional Joint Training Center. Sec. 1053. Comptroller General report on previously requested reports. Sec. 1054. Biennial report on nuclear triad. Sec. 1055. Comptroller General study on common alignment of world regions in departments and agencies with international responsibilities. Sec. 1056. Required reports concerning bomber modernization, sustainment, and recapitalization efforts in support of the national defense strategy. Sec. 1057. Comptroller General study and recommendations regarding security of southern land border of the United States. Sec. 1061. Public availability of Department of Defense reports required by law. Sec. 1062. Prohibition on infringing on the individual right to lawfully acquire, possess, own, carry, and otherwise use privately owned firearms, ammunition, and other weapons. Sec. 1063. Development of criteria and methodology for determining the safety and security of nuclear weapons. Sec. 1071. National Defense Panel. Sec. 1072. Sale of surplus military equipment to State and local homeland security and emergency management agencies. Sec. 1073. Defense research and development rapid innovation program. Sec. 1074. Authority to make excess nonlethal supplies available for domestic emergency assistance. Sec. 1075. Technical and clerical amendments. Sec. 1076. Study on optimal balance of manned and remotely piloted aircraft. Sec. 1077. Treatment of successor contingency operation to Operation Iraqi Freedom. Sec. 1078. Program to assess the utility of non-lethal weapons. Sec. 1079. Sense of Congress on strategic nuclear force reductions. Sec. 1101. Clarification of authorities at personnel demonstration laboratories. Sec. 1102. Requirements for Department of Defense senior mentors. Sec. 1103. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees working overseas. Sec. 1104. Extension and modification of enhanced Department of Defense appointment and compensation authority for personnel for care and treatment of wounded and injured members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 1105. Rate of overtime pay for Department of the Navy employees performing work aboard or dockside in support of the nuclear aircraft carrier forward deployed in Japan. Sec. 1201. Expansion of authority for support of special operations to combat terrorism. Sec. 1202. Addition of allied government agencies to enhanced logistics interoperability authority. Sec. 1203. Expansion of temporary authority to use acquisition and cross-servicing agreements to lend certain military equipment to certain foreign forces for personnel protection and survivability. Sec. 1204. Authority to pay personnel expenses in connection with African cooperation. Sec. 1205. Authority to build the capacity of Yemen Ministry of Interior Counter Terrorism Forces. Sec. 1206. Air Force scholarships for Partnership for Peace nations to participate in the Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training program. Sec. 1207. Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to build the capacity of foreign military forces. Sec. 1211. Limitation on availability of funds for certain purposes relating to Iraq. Sec. 1212. One-year extension and modification of Commanders’ Emergency Response Program. Sec. 1213. Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations. Sec. 1214. Extension of authority to transfer defense articles and provide defense services to the military and security forces of Iraq and Afghanistan. Sec. 1215. No permanent military bases in Afghanistan. Sec. 1216. Authority to use funds for reintegration activities in Afghanistan. Sec. 1217. Authority to establish a program to develop and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan. Sec. 1218. Extension of logistical support for coalition forces supporting operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Sec. 1219. Recommendations on oversight of contractors engaged in activities relating to Afghanistan. Sec. 1220. Extension and modification of Pakistan Counterinsurgency Fund. Sec. 1231. One-year extension of report on progress toward security and stability in Afghanistan. Sec. 1232. Two-year extension of United States plan for sustaining the Afghanistan National Security Forces. Sec. 1233. Modification of report on responsible redeployment of United States Armed Forces from Iraq. Sec. 1234. Report on Department of Defense support for coalition operations. Sec. 1235. Reports on police training programs. Sec. 1236. Report on certain Iraqis affiliated with the United States. Sec. 1237. Report on Department of Defense’s plans to reform the export control system. Sec. 1238. Report on United States efforts to defend against threats posed by the anti-access and area-denial capabilities of certain nation-states. Sec. 1239. Defense Science Board report on Department of Defense strategy to counter violent extremism outside the United States. Sec. 1240. Report on merits of an Incidents at Sea agreement between the United States, Iran, and certain other countries. Sec. 1241. Requirement to monitor and evaluate Department of Defense activities to counter violent extremism in Africa. Sec. 1242. NATO Special Operations Headquarters. Sec. 1243. National Military Strategy to Counter Iran and required briefings. Sec. 1301. Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction programs and funds. Sec. 1302. Funding allocations. Sec. 1303. Limitation on use of funds for establishment of centers of excellence in countries outside of the former Soviet Union. Sec. 1304. Plan for nonproliferation, proliferation prevention, and threat reduction activities with the People’s Republic of China. Sec. 1401. Working capital funds. Sec. 1402. Study on working capital fund cash balances. Sec. 1403. Modification of certain working capital fund requirements. Sec. 1404. Reduction of unobligated balances within the Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Revolving Fund. Sec. 1405. National Defense Sealift Fund. Sec. 1406. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense. Sec. 1407. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. Sec. 1408. Defense Inspector General. Sec. 1409. Defense Health Program. Sec. 1411. Authorized uses of National Defense Stockpile funds. Sec. 1412. Revision to required receipt objectives for previously authorized disposals from the National Defense Stockpile. Sec. 1421. Consolidation and reorganization of statutory authority for destruction of United States stockpile of lethal chemical agents and munitions. Sec. 1431. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home. Sec. 1432. Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois. Sec. 1501. Purpose. Sec. 1502. Army procurement. Sec. 1503. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund. Sec. 1504. Navy and Marine Corps procurement. Sec. 1505. Air Force procurement. Sec. 1506. Defense-wide activities procurement. Sec. 1507. National Guard and Reserve equipment. Sec. 1508. Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle Fund. Sec. 1509. Research, development, test, and evaluation. Sec. 1510. Operation and maintenance. Sec. 1511. Military personnel. Sec. 1512. Working capital funds. Sec. 1513. Defense Health Program. Sec. 1514. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. Sec. 1515. Defense Inspector General. Sec. 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations. Sec. 1522. Special transfer authority. Sec. 1531. Limitations on availability of funds in Afghanistan Security Forces Fund. Sec. 1532. Limitations on availability of funds in Iraq Security Forces Fund. Sec. 1533. Continuation of prohibition on use of United States funds for certain facilities projects in Iraq. Sec. 1534. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund. Sec. 1535. Task Force for Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan and economic transition plan and economic strategy for Afghanistan. Sec. 1601. Definition of Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and response program and other definitions. Sec. 1602. Comprehensive Department of Defense policy on sexual assault prevention and response program. Sec. 1611. Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office. Sec. 1612. Oversight and evaluation standards. Sec. 1613. Report and plan for completion of acquisition of centralized Department of Defense sexual assault database. Sec. 1614. Restricted reporting of sexual assaults. Sec. 1621. Improved protocols for providing medical care for victims of sexual assault. Sec. 1622. Sexual assault victims access to Victim Advocate services. Sec. 1631. Annual report regarding sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces and improvement to sexual assault prevention and response program. Sec. 1632. Additional reports. Sec. 1701. Short title. Sec. 1702. Recognition of the suffering and loyalty of the residents of Guam. Sec. 1703. Payments for Guam World War II claims. Sec. 1704. Adjudication. Sec. 1705. Grants program to memorialize the occupation of Guam during World War II. Sec. 1706. Authorization of appropriations. Sec. 2001. Short title. Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law. Sec. 2003. Funding tables. Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2102. Family housing. Sec. 2103. Improvements to military family housing units. Sec. 2104. Authorization of appropriations, Army. Sec. 2105. Use of unobligated Army military construction funds in conjunction with funds provided by the Commonwealth of Virginia to carry out certain fiscal year 2002 project. Sec. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2009 project. Sec. 2107. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project. Sec. 2108. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 projects. Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2202. Family housing. Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units. Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. Sec. 2205. Technical amendment to reflect multi-increment fiscal year 2010 project. Sec. 2206. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2008 project. Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2302. Family housing. Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units. Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force. Sec. 2305. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2007 project. Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2402. Energy conservation projects. Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies. Sec. 2404. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 projects. Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, defense-wide. Sec. 2412. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2000 project. Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve. Sec. 2607. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 projects. Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 1990. Sec. 2702. Authorized base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005. Sec. 2703. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005. Sec. 2704. Transportation plan for BRAC 133 project under Fort Belvoir, Virginia, BRAC initiative. Sec. 2801. Availability of military construction information on Internet. Sec. 2802. Use of Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Revolving Fund for construction or alteration at Pentagon Reservation. Sec. 2803. Reduced reporting time limits for certain military construction and real property reports when submitted in electronic media. Sec. 2804. Authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects inside the United States Central Command area of responsibility. Sec. 2805. Sense of Congress and report regarding employment of veterans to work on military construction projects. Sec. 2811. Notice-and-wait requirements applicable to real property transactions. Sec. 2812. Treatment of proceeds generated from leases of non-excess property involving military museums. Sec. 2813. Limitation on enhanced use leases of non-excess property. Sec. 2814. Repeal of expired authority to lease land for special operations activities. Sec. 2815. Former Naval Bombardment Area, Culebra Island, Puerto Rico. Sec. 2821. Extension of term of Deputy Secretary of Defense’s leadership of Guam Oversight Council. Sec. 2822. Utility conveyances to support integrated water and wastewater treatment system on Guam. Sec. 2823. Report on types of facilities required to support Guam realignment. Sec. 2824. Report on civilian infrastructure needs for Guam. Sec. 2831. Consideration of environmentally sustainable practices in Department energy performance plan. Sec. 2832. Enhancement of energy security activities of the Department of Defense. Sec. 2841. Land conveyance, Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP) Whittier, Alaska. Sec. 2842. Land conveyance, Fort Knox, Kentucky. Sec. 2843. Land conveyance, Naval Support Activity (West Bank), New Orleans, Louisiana. Sec. 2844. Land conveyance, former Navy Extremely Low Frequency communications project site, Republic, Michigan. Sec. 2845. Land conveyance, Marine Forces Reserve Center, Wilmington, North Carolina. Sec. 2851. Limitation on availability of funds pending report regarding construction of a new outlying landing field in North Carolina and Virginia. Sec. 2852. Requirements related to providing world class military medical centers. Sec. 2853. Report on fuel infrastructure sustainment, restoration, and modernization requirements. Sec. 2854. Naming of Armed Forces Reserve Center, Middletown, Connecticut. Sec. 2855. Sense of Congress on proposed extension of the Alaska Railroad corridor across Federal land in Alaska. Sec. 2856. Sense of Congress on improving military housing for members of the Air Force. Sec. 2857. Sense of Congress regarding recreational hunting and fishing on military installations. Sec. 2901. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2902. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition project. Sec. 2903. Authorized Defense Wide Construction and Land Acquisition Projects and Authorization of Appropriations. Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration. Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup. Sec. 3103. Other defense activities. Sec. 3104. Energy security and assurance. Sec. 3111. Aircraft procurement. Sec. 3112. Biennial plan on modernization and refurbishment of the nuclear security complex. Sec. 3113. Comptroller General assessment of adequacy of budget requests with respect to the modernization and refurbishment of the nuclear weapons stockpile. Sec. 3114. Notification of cost overruns for certain Department of Energy projects. Sec. 3115. Establishment of cooperative research and development centers. Sec. 3116. Future-years defense environmental management plan. Sec. 3117. Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy for appointment of certain scientific, engineering, and technical personnel. Sec. 3118. Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter into transactions to carry out certain research projects. Sec. 3119. Extension of authority relating to the International Materials Protection, Control, and Accounting Program of the Department of Energy. Sec. 3120. Extension of deadline for transfer of parcels of land to be conveyed to Los Alamos County, New Mexico, and held in trust for the Pueblo of San Ildefonso. Sec. 3121. Repeal of sunset provision for modification of minor construction threshold for plant projects. Sec. 3122. Enhancing private-sector employment through cooperative research and development activities. Sec. 3123. Limitation on use of funds for establishment of centers of excellence in countries outside of the former Soviet Union. Sec. 3124. Department of Energy energy parks program. Sec. 3131. Report on graded security protection policy. Sec. 3201. Authorization. Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations. Sec. 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the merchant marine for fiscal year 2011. Sec. 3502. Extension of Maritime Security Fleet program. Sec. 3503. United States Merchant Marine Academy nominations of residents of the Northern Mariana Islands. Sec. 3504. Research authority. For purposes of this Act, the term ‘congressional defense committees’ has the meaning given that term in DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS TITLE I--PROCUREMENT Sec. 101. Army. Sec. 102. Navy and Marine Corps. Sec. 103. Air Force. Sec. 104. Defense-wide activities. Sec. 111. Multiyear funding for detail design and construction of LHA Replacement ship designated LHA-7. Sec. 112. Requirement to maintain Navy airborne signals intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities. Sec. 113. Report on naval force structure and missile defense. Sec. 114. Reports on service-life extension of F/A-18 aircraft by the Department of the Navy. Sec. 121. Limitations on biometric systems funds. Sec. 122. System management plan and matrix for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft program. Sec. 123. Quarterly reports on use of Combat Mission Requirements funds. Sec. 124. Counter-improvised explosive device initiatives database. Sec. 125. Study on lightweight body armor solutions. Sec. 126. Integration of solid state laser systems into certain aircraft. Sec. 127. Contracts for commercial imaging satellite capacities. Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for procurement for the Army as follows: (1) For aircraft, $5,908,384,000. (2) For missiles, $1,670,463,000. (3) For weapons and tracked combat vehicles, $1,656,263,000. (4) For ammunition, $1,953,194,000. (5) For other procurement, $9,758,965,000. (a) Navy- Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for procurement for the Navy as follows: (1) For aircraft, $18,877,139,000. (2) For weapons, including missiles and torpedoes, $3,358,264,000. (3) For shipbuilding and conversion, $15,724,520,000. (4) For other procurement, $6,381,815,000. (b) Marine Corps- Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for procurement for the Marine Corps in the amount of $1,296,838,000. (c) Navy and Marine Corps Ammunition- Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for procurement of ammunition for the Navy and the Marine Corps in the amount of $817,991,000. Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for procurement for the Air Force as follows: (1) For aircraft, $14,668,408,000. (2) For ammunition, $672,420,000. (3) For missiles, $5,444,464,000. (4) For other procurement, $17,845,342,000. Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for Defense-wide procurement in the amount of $4,398,168,000. Subtitle B--Navy Programs (a) Authority to Use Multiple Years of Funding- The Secretary of the Navy may enter into a contract for detail design and construction of the LHA Replacement ship designated LHA-7 that provides that, subject to subsection (b), funds for payments under the contract may be provided from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. (b) Condition for Out-year Contract Payments- A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2011 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year. (a) Findings- Congress finds the following: (1) The Navy terminated the EP-X program to acquire a new land-based airborne signals intelligence capability because of escalating costs and funds budgeted for the program were re-allocated to other priorities. (2) The Navy took this action without planning and budgeting for alternative means to meet operational requirements for tactical-level and theater-level signals intelligence capabilities to support the combatant commands and national intelligence consumers. (3) The principal Navy airborne signals intelligence capability today is the EP-3E Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic System II (ARIES II)--the aircraft and associated electronic equipment of this system are aging and will require replacement or substantial ongoing upgrades to continue to meet requirements. (4) The Special Projects Aircraft (SPA) platform of the Navy is the second critical element in the airborne signals intelligence capability of the Navy and provides the Navy its most advanced, comprehensive multi-intelligence and quick-reaction capability available. (b) Requirement To Maintain Capabilities- (1) PROHIBITION ON RETIREMENT OF PLATFORMS- The Secretary of the Navy may not retire (or to prepare to retire) the EP-3E Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic System II or Special Projects Aircraft platform. (2) MAINTENANCE OF PLATFORMS- The Secretary of the Navy shall continue to maintain, sustain, and upgrade the EP-3E Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic System II and Special Projects Aircraft platforms in order to provide capabilities necessary to operate effectively against rapidly evolving threats and to meet combatant commander operational intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements. (3) CERTIFICATION- Not later than February 1, 2011, and annually thereafter, the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly certify to Congress the following: (A) The Secretary of the Navy is maintaining and sustaining the EP-3E Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic System II and Special Projects Aircraft platform in a manner that meets the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements of the commanders of the combatant commands. (B) Any plan for the retirement or replacement of the EP-3E Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic System II or Special Projects Aircraft platform will provide, in the aggregate, an equivalent or superior capability and capacity to the platform concerned. (4) TERMINATION- The requirements of this subsection with respect to the EP-3E Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic System II or the Special Projects Aircraft platform shall expire on the commencement of the fielding by the Navy of a platform or mix of platforms and sensors that are, in the aggregate, equivalent or superior to the EP-3E Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic System II (spiral 3) or the Special Projects Aircraft (P909) platform. (c) Restriction on Transfer of Saber Focus Program ISR Capabilities- (1) RESTRICTION- The Secretary of the Navy may not transfer the Saber Focus unmanned aerial system, associated equipment, or processing, exploitation, and dissemination capabilities of the Saber Focus program to the Secretary of the Air Force until 30 days after the Secretary of the Air Force certifies to the congressional defense committees that after such a transfer, the Secretary of the Air Force will provide intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (hereinafter in this section referred to as ‘ISR’) capabilities at the same or greater capability and capacity level as the capability or capacity level at which the Saber Focus program provides such capabilities to the area of operations concerned as of the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) CONTINUED NAVY PROVISION OF CAPABILITIES- The Secretary of the Navy shall continue to provide Saber Focus ISR program capabilities at the same or greater capability and capacity level as the capability or capacity level at which the Saber Focus program provides such capabilities as of the date of the enactment of this Act to the area of operations concerned until-- (A) the certification referred to in paragraph (1) is provided to the congressional defense committees; or (B) 30 days after the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that the ISR capabilities of the Saber Focus program are no longer required to mitigate the ISR requirements of the combatant commander in the area of operations concerned. (a) Report- Not later than March 31, 2011, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of the Navy and the Chief of Naval Operations, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the force structure requirements of the major combatant surface vessels with respect to ballistic missile defense. (b) Matters Included- The report shall include the following: (1) An analysis of whether the requirement for sea-based missile defense can be accommodated by upgrading Aegis ships that exist as of the date of the report or by procuring additional combatant surface vessels. (2) A discussion of whether such sea-based missile defense will require increasing the overall number of combatant surface vessels beyond the requirement of 88 cruisers and destroyers in the 313-ship fleet plan of the Navy. (3) A discussion of the process for determining the number of Aegis ships needed by each commander of the combatant commands to fulfill ballistic missile defense requirements, including (in consultation with the Chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff) the number of such ships needed to support the phased, adaptive approach to ballistic missile defense in Europe. (4) A discussion of the impact of Aegis Ashore missile defense deployments, as well as deployment of other elements of the ballistic missile defense system, on Aegis ballistic missile defense ship force structure requirements. (5) A discussion of the potential effect of ballistic missile defense operations on the ability of the Navy to meet surface fleet demands in each geographic area and for each mission set. (6) An evaluation of how the Aegis ballistic missile defense program can succeed as part of a balanced fleet of adequate size and strength to meet the security needs of the United States. (7) A description of both the shortfalls and the benefits of expected technological advancements in the sea-based missile defense program. (8) A description of the anticipated plan for deployment of Aegis ballistic missile defense ships within the context of the fleet response plan. (a) Cost-benefit Analysis of Service Life Extension of F/A-18 Aircraft- Before the Secretary of the Navy may enter into a program to extend the service life of F/A-18 aircraft beyond 8,600 hours, the Secretary shall-- (1) conduct a cost-benefit analysis, in accordance with Office of Management and Budget Circular A-94, comparing extending the service life of existing F/A-18 aircraft with procuring additional F/A-18E or F/A-18F aircraft as a means of managing the shortfall of the Department of the Navy in strike fighter aircraft; and (2) submit to the congressional defense committees a report on such cost-benefit analysis. (b) Elements of Cost-benefit Analysis- The cost-benefit analysis required by subsection (a)(1) shall include the following: (1) An estimate of the full costs, over the period covered by the future-years defense program submitted to Congress under (A) any increases in operation and maintenance costs associated with operating such aircraft beyond a service life of 8,600 hours; and (B) the costs with respect to the airframe, avionics, software, and aircraft subsystems and components required to remain relevant in countering future threats and meeting the warfighting requirements of the commanders of the combatant commands. (2) An estimate of the full costs, over the period covered by such future-years defense program, of procuring such additional F/A-18E or F/A-18F aircraft as would be required to meet the strike fighter requirements of the Department of the Navy in the event the service life of legacy F/A-18 aircraft is not extended beyond 8,600 hours. (3) An assessment of risks associated with extending the service life of legacy F/A-18 aircraft beyond 8,600 hours, including the level of certainty that the Secretary will be able to achieve such an extension. (4) An estimate of the cost-per-flight hour incurred in operating legacy F/A-18 aircraft with a service life extended beyond 8,600 hours. (5) An estimate of the cost-per-flight hour incurred for operating new F/A-18E or FA-18F aircraft. (6) An assessment of any alternatives to extending the service life of legacy F/A-18 aircraft beyond 8,600 hours or buying additional F/A-18E or F/A-18F aircraft that may be available to the Secretary to manage the shortfall of the Department of the Navy in strike fighter aircraft. (c) Additional Elements of Report- In addition to the information required in the cost-benefit analysis under subsection (b), the report under subsection (a)(2) shall include an assessment of the following: (1) Differences in capabilities of-- (A) legacy F/A-18 aircraft that have undergone service-life extension; (B) F/A-18E or F/A-18F aircraft; and (C) F-35C aircraft. (2) Differences in capabilities that would result under the legacy F/A-18 aircraft service-life extension program if such program would-- (A) provide only airframe-life extensions to the legacy F/A-18 aircraft fleet; and (B) provide for airframe-life extensions and capability upgrades to the legacy F/A-18 aircraft fleet. (3) Any disruption that procuring additional F/A-18E or F/A-18F aircraft, rather than extending the service life of legacy F/A-18 aircraft beyond 8,600 hours, would have on the plan of the Navy to procure operational carrier-variant Joint Strike Fighter aircraft. (4) Any changes that procuring additional F/A-18E or FA-18F aircraft, rather than extending the service life of legacy F/A-18 aircraft beyond 8600 hours, would have on the force structure or force mix intended by the Navy for its carrier air wings. (5) Any other operational implication of extending (or not extending) the service life of legacy F/A-18 aircraft that the Secretary considers appropriate. (d) Report On Operational F/A-18 Aircraft Squadrons- Before reducing the number of F/A-18 aircraft in an operational squadron of the Navy or Marine Corps, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that discusses the operational risks and impacts of reducing the squadron size. The report shall include an assessment of the following: (1) The effect of the reduction on the operational capability and readiness of the Navy and the Marine Corps to conduct overseas contingency operations. (2) The effect of the reduction on the capability of the Navy and the Marine Corps to meet ongoing operational demands. (3) Any mechanisms the Secretary intends to use to mitigate any risks associated with the squadron size reduction. (4) The effect of the reduction on pilots and ground support crews of F/A-18 aircraft, in terms of training, readiness, and war fighting capabilities. (e) Report On F/A-18 Aircraft Training Squadrons- Before reducing the size of an F/A-18 aircraft training squadron, or transferring an F/A-18 training aircraft for operational needs, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that describes-- (1) any risks to sustaining required training of F/A-18 aircraft pilots with a reduced training aircraft base; and (2) any actions the Navy is taking to mitigate the risks described under paragraph (1). Subtitle C--Joint and Multiservice Matters Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2011 for biometrics programs and operations, not more than 85 percent may be obligated or expended until-- (1) the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report on the actions taken and planned to be taken-- (A) to implement subparagraphs (A) through (F) of paragraph (16) of the National Security Presidential Directive dated June 5, 2008 (NSPD-59); (B) to implement the recommendations of the Comptroller General of the United States included in the report of the Comptroller General numbered GAO-08-1065 dated September 2008; (C) to implement the recommendations of the Comptroller General included in the report of the Comptroller General numbered GAO-09-49 dated October 2008; (D) to fully and completely characterize the current biometrics architecture and establish the objective architecture for the Department of Defense; (E) to ensure that an official of the Office of the Secretary of Defense has the authority necessary to be responsible for ensuring that all funding for biometrics programs and operations is programmed, budgeted, and executed; and (F) to ensure that an officer within the Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has the authority necessary to be responsible for ensuring the development and implementation of common and interoperable standards for the collection, storage, and use of biometrics data by all commanders of the combatant commands and their commands; and (2) a period of 30 days has elapsed after the date on which the report is submitted under paragraph (1). (a) System Management Plan- (1) PLAN REQUIRED- The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall establish a management plan for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft program under which decisions to commit to specified levels of production are linked to progress in meeting specified program milestones, including design, manufacturing, testing, and fielding milestones for critical system maturity elements. (2) NATURE OF PLAN- The plan under paragraph (1) shall align technical progress milestones with acquisition milestones in a system maturity matrix. The matrix shall provide criteria and conditions for comparing expected levels of demonstrated system maturity with annual production commitments, starting with the fiscal year 2012 production program, and continuing over the remaining life of the system development and demonstration program. The matrix and criteria shall include elements such as the following: (A) Manufacturing maturity, including on-time deliveries, manufacturing process control, quality rates, and labor efficiency rates. (B) Engineering maturity, including metrics for the number of new design actions and number of design changes in a given period. (C) Performance and testing progress, including test points, hours and flights accomplished, capabilities demonstrated, key performance parameters, and attributes demonstrated. (D) Mission effectiveness and system reliability, including operational effectiveness and reliability growth. (E) Training, fielding, and deployment status. (b) Reports to Congress- (1) INITIAL REPORT- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the plan required by subsection (a). The report shall include-- (A) the proposed system maturity matrix described in subsection (a)(2), including a description, for each element specified in the matrix under subsection (a)(2), of the criteria and milestones to be used in evaluating actual program performance against planned performance for each annual production commitment; and (B) a description of the actions to be taken to implement the plan. (2) UPDATES- The Secretary shall submit to Congress, at or about the same time as the submittal to Congress of the budget of the President for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2012 (as submitted pursuant to (c) Report on Capabilities of Marine Corps Variant of F-35 Fighter Aircraft at Initial Operating Capability- (1) IN GENERAL- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the expected capabilities of the F-35B Joint Strike Fighter aircraft at the time when the Marine Corps plans to declare Initial Operating Capability for the F-35B Joint Strike Fighter aircraft. The report shall be prepared in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. (2) ELEMENTS- The report under paragraph (1) shall including a description of the following with respect to the F-35B Joint Strike Fighter aircraft: (A) Performance of the aircraft and its subsystems, compared to key performance parameters. (B) Expected capability to perform Marine Corps missions. (C) Required maintenance and logistics standards, including mission capability rates. (D) Expected levels of crew training and performance. (E) Product improvements that are planned before the Initial Operating Capability of the aircraft to be made after the Initial Operating Capability of the aircraft, as planned in March 2010. (a) Quarterly Reports Required- (1) IN GENERAL- Not later than 30 days after the end of each fiscal quarter, the commander of the United States Special Operations Command shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the use of Combat Mission Requirements funds during the preceding fiscal quarter. (2) COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS FUNDS- For purposes of this section, Combat Mission Requirements funds are amounts available to the Department of Defense for Defense-wide procurement in the Combat Mission Requirements subaccount of the Defense-wide Procurement account. (b) Elements- Each report under subsection (a) shall include, for the fiscal quarter covered by such report, the following: (1) The balance of the Combat Mission Requirements subaccount at the beginning of such quarter. (2) The balance of the Combat Mission Requirements subaccount at the end of such quarter. (3) Any transfer of funds into or out of the Combat Mission Requirements subaccount during such quarter, including the source of any funds transferred into the subaccount, and the objective of any transfer of funds out of the subaccount. (4) A description of any requirement-- (A) approved for procurement using Combat Mission Requirements funds during such quarter; or (B) procured using such funds during such quarter. (5) With respect to each description of a requirement under paragraph (4), the amount of Combat Mission Requirements funds committed to the procurement or approved procurement of such requirement. (c) Form- Each report under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (a) Comprehensive Database- (1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization, shall develop and maintain a comprehensive database containing appropriate information for coordinating, tracking, and archiving each counter-improvised explosive device initiative within the Department of Defense. The database shall, at a minimum, ensure the visibility of each counter-improvised explosive device initiative. (2) USE OF INFORMATION- Using information contained in the database developed under paragraph (1), the Secretary, acting through the Director of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization, shall-- (A) identify and eliminate redundant counter-improvised explosive device initiatives; (B) facilitate the transition of counter-improvised explosive device initiatives from funding under the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund to funding provided by the military departments; and (C) notify the appropriate personnel and organizations prior to a counter-improvised explosive device initiative being funded through the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund. (3) COORDINATION- In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary shall ensure that the Secretary of each military department coordinates and collaborates on development of the database to ensure its interoperability, completeness, consistency, and effectiveness. (b) Metrics- The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization, shall-- (1) develop appropriate means to measure the effectiveness of counter-improvised explosive device initiatives; and (2) prioritize the funding of such initiatives according to such means. (c) Counter-improvised Explosive Device Initiative Defined- In this section, the term ‘counter-improvised explosive device initiative’ means any project, program, or research activity funded by any component of the Department of Defense that is intended to assist or support efforts to counter, combat, or defeat the use of improvised explosive devices. (a) Study Required- The Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct a study to-- (1) assess the effectiveness of the processes used by the Secretary to identify and examine the requirements for lighter weight body armor systems; and (2) determine ways in which the Secretary may more effectively address the research, development, and procurement requirements regarding reducing the weight of body armor. (b) Matters Covered- The study conducted under subsection (a) shall include findings and recommendations regarding the following: (1) The requirement for lighter weight body armor and personal protective equipment and the ability of the Secretary to meet such requirement. (2) Innovative design ideas for more modular body armor that allow for scalable protection levels for various missions and threats. (3) The need for research, development, and acquisition funding dedicated specifically for reducing the weight of body armor. (4) The efficiency and effectiveness of current body armor funding procedures and processes. (5) Industry concerns, capabilities, and willingness to invest in the development and production of lightweight body armor initiatives. (6) Barriers preventing the development of lighter weight body armor (including such barriers with respect to technical, institutional, or financial problems). (7) Changes to procedures or policy with respect to lightweight body armor. (8) Other areas of concern not previously addressed by equipping boards, body armor producers, or program managers. (c) Submission to Congress- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the study conducted under subsection (a). (a) Analysis of Feasibility Required- The Secretary of Defense shall conduct an analysis of the feasibility of integrating solid state laser systems into the aircraft platforms specified in subsection (b) for purposes of permitting such aircraft to accomplish their missions, including to provide close air support. (b) Aircraft- The aircraft platforms specified in this subsection shall include, at a minimum, the following: (1) The C-130 aircraft. (2) The B-1 bomber aircraft. (3) The F-35 fighter aircraft. (c) Scope of Analysis- The analysis required by subsection (a) shall include a determination of the following: (1) The estimated cost per unit of each laser system analyzed. (2) The estimated cost of operation and maintenance of each aircraft platform specified in subsection (b) in connection with each laser system analyzed, noting that the fidelity of such analysis may not be uniform for all aircraft platforms. (a) Telescope Requirements Under Contracts After 2010- Except as provided in subsection (b), any contract for additional commercial imaging satellite capability or capacity entered into by the Department of Defense after December 31, 2010, shall require that the imaging telescope providing such capability or capacity under such contract has an aperture of not less than 1.5 meters. (b) Waiver- The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation in subsection (a) if-- (1) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees written certification that the waiver is in the national security interests of the United States; and (2) a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the certification under paragraph (1) is submitted. (c) Continuation of Current Contracts- The limitation in subsection (a) may not be construed to prohibit or prevent the Secretary of Defense from continuing or maintaining current commercial imaging satellite capability or capacity in orbit or under contract by December 31, 2010. TITLE II--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations. Sec. 211. Enhancement of Department of Defense support of science, mathematics, and engineering education. Sec. 212. Limitation on use of funds by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency for operation of National Cyber Range. Sec. 213. Separate program elements required for research and development of Joint Light Tactical Vehicle. Sec. 214. Program for research, development, and deployment of advanced ground vehicles, ground vehicle systems, and components. Sec. 215. Demonstration and pilot projects on cybersecurity. Sec. 221. Sense of Congress on ballistic missile defense. Sec. 222. Repeal of prohibition of certain contracts by Missile Defense Agency with foreign entities. Sec. 223. Limitation on availability of funds for missile defense interceptors in Europe. Sec. 224. Medium Extended Air Defense System. Sec. 225. Acquisition accountability reports on the ballistic missile defense system. Sec. 226. Authority to support ballistic missile shared early warning with the Czech Republic. Sec. 227. Report on phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe. Sec. 228. Independent review and assessment of the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system. Sec. 229. Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program. Sec. 231. Report on analysis of alternatives and program requirements for the Ground Combat Vehicle program. Sec. 232. Cost benefit analysis of future tank-fired munitions. Sec. 233. Annual Comptroller General report on the VH-(XX) presidential helicopter acquisition program. Sec. 241. Sense of Congress affirming the importance of Department of Defense participation in development of next generation semiconductor technologies. Sec. 242. Pilot program on collaborative energy security. Sec. 243. Pilot program to include technology protection features during research and development of defense systems. Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation as follows: (1) For the Army, $10,093,704,000. (2) For the Navy, $17,881,008,000. (3) For the Air Force, $27,319,627,000. (4) For Defense-wide activities, $21,292,576,000, of which $194,910,000 is authorized for the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. Subtitle B--Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations (a) Discharge of Support Through Military Departments- (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): ‘(2) The Secretary of Defense may carry out the authority in paragraph (1) through the Secretaries of the military departments.’. (b) Partnership Intermediaries for Purposes of Education Partnerships- Section 2194 of such title is amended-- (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e): ‘(e) The Secretary of Defense may permit the director of a defense laboratory to enter into a cooperative agreement with an appropriate entity to act as an intermediary and assist the director in carrying out activities under this section.’. (a) Prohibition on Use of Funds Pending Report- Amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act and available to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency may not be obligated or expended for the National Cyber Range established in support of the Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative until the date that is 90 days after the date on which the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report described in subsection (c). (b) Limitation on Use of Funds After Report- Commencing on the date that is 90 days after the date on which the Under Secretary submits a report described in subsection (c), amounts described in subsection (a) shall be available for obligation or expenditure only for the purposes of research and development activities that the Under Secretary considers appropriate for ensuring and assessing the functionality of the National Cyber Range. (c) Report- (1) IN GENERAL- The report described in this subsection is a report setting forth a plan for the transition of the National Cyber Range to operation and sustainment. (2) ELEMENTS- The report shall include, at a minimum, the following: (A) An analysis of various potential recipients under the transition of the National Cyber Range. (B) For each recipient analyzed under subparagraph (A), a description of the proposed transition of the National Cyber Range to such recipient, including the proposed schedule and funding for such transition. (3) POTENTIAL RECIPIENTS- The recipients analyzed in the report under paragraph (2)(A) shall include, at a minimum, the following: (A) A consortium for the operation and sustainment of the National Cyber Range as a government-owned, government-operated facility. (B) A consortium for the operation and sustainment of the National Cyber Range as a government-owned, contractor-operated facility. In the budget materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to (a) Program Authorized- The Secretary of Defense may carry out a program for research and development on, and deployment of, advanced technology ground vehicles, ground vehicle systems, and components within the Department of Defense. (b) Goals and Objectives- The goals and objectives of the program authorized by subsection (a) are as follows: (1) To identify and support technological advances that are necessary for the development of advanced technologies for use in ground vehicles of types to be used by the Department of Defense. (2) To procure and deploy significant quantities of advanced technology ground vehicles for use by the Department. (3) To maximize the leverage of Federal and nongovernment funds used for the development and deployment of advanced technology ground vehicles, ground vehicle systems, and components. (c) Elements of Program- The program authorized by subsection (a) may include-- (1) enhanced research and development activities for advanced technology ground vehicles, ground vehicle systems, and components, including-- (A) increased investments in research and development of batteries, advanced materials, power electronics, fuel cells and fuel cell systems, hybrid systems, and advanced engines; (B) pilot projects for the demonstration of advanced technologies in ground vehicles for use by the Department of Defense; and (C) the establishment of public-private partnerships, including research centers, manufacturing and prototyping facilities, and test beds, to speed the development, deployment, and transition to use of advanced technology ground vehicles, ground vehicle systems, and components; and (2) enhanced activities to procure and deploy advanced technology ground vehicles in the Department, including-- (A) preferences for the purchase of advanced technology ground vehicles; (B) the use of authorities available to the Secretary of Defense to stimulate the development and production of advanced technology systems and ground vehicles through purchases, loan guarantees, and other mechanisms; (C) pilot programs to demonstrate advanced technology ground vehicles and associated infrastructure at select defense installations; (D) metrics to evaluate environmental and other benefits, life cycle costs, and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the deployment of advanced technology ground vehicles; and (E) schedules and objectives for the conversion of the ground vehicle fleet of the Department to advanced technology ground vehicles. (d) Cooperation With Industry and Academia- (1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary may carry out the program authorized by subsection (a) through partnerships and other cooperative agreements with private sector entities, including-- (A) universities and other academic institutions; (B) companies in the automobile and truck manufacturing industry; (C) companies that supply systems and components to the automobile and truck manufacturing industry; and (D) any other companies or private sector entities that the Secretary considers appropriate. (2) NATURE OF COOPERATION- The Secretary shall ensure that any partnership or cooperative agreement under paragraph (1) provides for private sector participants to collectively contribute, in cash or in kind, not less than one-half of the total cost of the activities carried out under such partnership or cooperative agreement. (e) Coordination With Other Federal Agencies- The program authorized by subsection (a) shall be carried out, to the maximum extent practicable, in coordination with the Department of Energy and other appropriate departments and agencies of the Federal Government. (a) Demonstration Projects on Processes for Application of Commercial Technologies to Cybersecurity Requirements- (1) PROJECTS REQUIRED- The Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the military departments shall jointly carry out demonstration projects to assess the feasibility and advisability of using various business models and processes to rapidly and effectively identify innovative commercial technologies and apply such technologies to Department of Defense and other cybersecurity requirements. (2) SCOPE OF PROJECTS- Any demonstration project under paragraph (1) shall be carried out in such a manner as to contribute to the cyber policy review of the President and the Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative. (b) Pilot Programs on Cybersecurity Required- The Secretary of Defense shall support or conduct pilot programs on cybersecurity with respect to the following areas: (1) Threat sensing and warning for information networks worldwide. (2) Managed security services for cybersecurity within the defense industrial base, military departments, and combatant commands. (3) Use of private processes and infrastructure to address threats, problems, vulnerabilities, or opportunities in cybersecurity. (4) Processes for securing the global supply chain. (5) Processes for threat sensing and security of cloud computing infrastructure. (c) Reports- (1) REPORTS REQUIRED- Not later than 240 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter at or about the time of the submittal to Congress of the budget of the President for a fiscal year (as submitted pursuant to (2) ELEMENTS- Each report under this subsection shall include the following: (A) A description and assessment of any activities under the demonstration projects and pilot projects referred to in paragraph (1) during the preceding year. (B) For the pilot projects supported or conducted under subsection (b)(2)-- (i) a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the extent to which managed security services covered by the pilot project could provide effective and affordable cybersecurity capabilities for components of the Department of Defense and for entities in the defense industrial base, and an assessment whether such services could be expanded rapidly to a large scale without exceeding the ability of the Federal Government to manage such expansion; and (ii) an assessment of whether managed security services are compatible with the cybersecurity strategy of the Department of Defense with respect to conducting an active, in-depth defense under the direction of United States Cyber Command. (C) For the pilot projects supported or conducted under subsection (b)(3)-- (i) a description of any performance metrics established for purposes of the pilot project, and a description of any processes developed for purposes of accountability and governance under any partnership under the pilot project; and (ii) an assessment of the role a partnership such as a partnership under the pilot project would play in the acquisition of cyberspace capabilities by the Department of Defense, including a role with respect to the development and approval of requirements, approval and oversight of acquiring capabilities, test and evaluation of new capabilities, and budgeting for new capabilities. (D) For the pilot projects supported or conducted under subsection (b)(4)-- (i) a framework and taxonomy for evaluating practices that secure the global supply chain, as well as practices for securely operating in an uncertain or compromised supply chain; (ii) an assessment of the viability of applying commercial practices for securing the global supply chain; and (iii) an assessment of the viability of applying commercial practices for securely operating in an uncertain or compromised supply chain. (E) For the pilot projects supported or conducted under subsection (b)(5)-- (i) an assessment of the capabilities of Federal Government providers to offer secure cloud computing environments; and (ii) an assessment of the capabilities of commercial providers to offer secure cloud computing environments to the Federal Government. (3) FORM- Each report under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. Subtitle C--Missile Defense Programs (a) Sense of Congress- It is the sense of Congress-- (1) that the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe is an appropriate response to the existing ballistic missile threat from Iran to the European territory of North Atlantic Treaty Organization countries, and to potential future ballistic missile capabilities of Iran; (2) that the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe is not intended to, and will not, provide a missile defense capability relative to the ballistic missile deterrent forces of the Russian Federation, or diminish strategic stability with the Russian Federation; (3) to support the efforts of the United States Government and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to pursue cooperation with the Russian Federation on ballistic missile defense relative to Iranian missile threats; (4) that the ground-based midcourse defense system deployed in Alaska and California currently provides adequate defensive capability for the United States against currently anticipated future long-range ballistic missile threats from Iran, and this capability will be enhanced as the system is improved, including by the planned deployment of an AN/TPY-2 radar in southern Europe in 2011; (5) that the ground-based midcourse defense system should be maintained, enhanced, and adequately tested to ensure its operational capability through its service life; (6) that the United States should, as stated in its unilateral statement accompanying the New START Treaty, ‘continue improving and deploying its missile defense systems in order to defend itself against limited attack and as part of our collaborative approach to strengthening stability in key regions’; (7) that, as part of this effort, the Department of Defense should pursue the development, testing, and deployment of operationally effective versions of all variants of the standard missile-3 for all four phases of the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe; (8) that the standard missile-3 block IIB interceptor missile planned for deployment in phase 4 of the phased, adaptive approach should be capable of addressing the potential future threat of intermediate-range and long-range ballistic missiles from Iran, including intercontinental ballistic missiles that could be capable of reaching the United States; (9) that there are no constraints contained in the New START Treaty on the development or deployment by the United States of effective missile defenses, including all phases of the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe and further enhancements to the ground-based midcourse defense system, as well as future missile defenses; and (10) that the Department of Defense should continue the development, testing, and assessment of the two-stage ground-based interceptor in such a manner as to provide a hedge against potential technical challenges with the development of the standard missile-3 block IIB interceptor missile as a means of augmenting the defense of Europe and of the homeland against a limited ballistic missile attack from nations such as North Korea or Iran. (b) New START Treaty Defined- In this section, the term ‘New START Treaty’ means the Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010. Section 222 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989 ( (a) Limitation on Construction and Deployment of Interceptors- No funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2011 or any fiscal year thereafter may be obligated or expended for site activation, construction, or deployment of missile defense interceptors on European land as part of the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe until-- (1) any nation agreeing to host such system has signed and ratified a missile defense basing agreement and a status of forces agreement authorizing the deployment of such interceptors; and (2) a period of 45 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees the report on the independent assessment of alternative missile defense systems in Europe required by section 235(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (b) Limitation on Procurement or Deployment of Interceptors- No funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2011 or any fiscal year thereafter may be obligated or expended for the procurement (other than initial long-lead procurement) or deployment of operational missiles on European land as part of the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe until the Secretary of Defense, after receiving the views of the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, submits to the congressional defense committees a report certifying that the proposed interceptor to be deployed as part of such missile defense system has demonstrated, through successful, operationally realistic flight testing, a high probability of working in an operationally effective manner and that such missile defense system has the ability to accomplish the mission. (c) Waiver- The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitations in subsections (a) and (b) if-- (1) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees written certification that the waiver is in the urgent national security interests of the United States; and (2) a period of seven days has elapsed following the date on which the certification under paragraph (1) is submitted. (d) Construction- Nothing in this section shall be construed so as to limit the obligation and expenditure of funds for any missile defense activities not otherwise limited by subsection (a) or (b), including, with respect to the planned deployments of missile defense interceptors on European land as part of the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe-- (1) research, development, test and evaluation; (2) site surveys; (3) studies and analyses; and (4) site planning and design and construction design. (e) Conforming Repeal- Section 234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (a) Limitation on Availability of Funds- Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated in this title for fiscal year 2011 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Army, of the amount that corresponds with budget activity five, line 117, in the budget transmitted to Congress by the President for fiscal year 2011, not more than 25 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which-- (1) the Secretary of Defense completes the critical design review and the system program review for the medium extended air defense system program and decides to proceed with the program; and (2) the Secretary submits in writing to the congressional defense committees a report containing the decision referred to in paragraph (1) to proceed with the medium extended air defense system. (b) Further Limitations- (1) IN GENERAL- Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated in this title for fiscal year 2011 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Army, of the amount that corresponds with budget activity five, line 117, in the budget transmitted to Congress by the President for fiscal year 2011, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 30 days have elapsed following the date on which the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees a report containing the elements specified in paragraph (2). (2) ELEMENTS OF REPORT- The elements specified in this paragraph for the report described in paragraph (1) are the following: (A) A detailed description of the decision described in subsection (a)(1) and the explanation for that decision. (B) A cost estimate performed by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation of the medium extended air defense system program, including an analysis of the cost growth in the program and an explanation of what effect such cost growth would have if the program were subject to the provisions of (C) An analysis of alternatives to the medium extended air defense system program and its component elements. (D) A description of the planned schedule and cost for the development, production, and deployment of the medium extended air defense system, including the cost and schedule for any variations to the baseline program to be fielded by the Armed Forces. (E) A description of the role of Germany and Italy in the medium extended air defense system program, including the role of such countries in procurement or production of elements of such program. (F) Any other matters that the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. (c) Form of Reports- The reports submitted under this section shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (a) Baselines Required- The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Missile Defense Agency establishes and maintains an acquisition baseline for each program element of the ballistic missile defense system, as specified in (b) Elements of Baselines- Each acquisition baseline required by subsection (a) for a program element shall include the following: (1) A comprehensive schedule for the program element, including-- (A) research and development milestones; (B) acquisition milestones, including design reviews and key decision points; (C) key test events, including ground and flight tests and ballistic missile defense system tests; and (D) delivery and fielding schedules. (2) A detailed technical description of-- (A) the capability to be developed, including hardware and software; (B) system requirements; (C) how the proposed capability satisfies a capability identified by the commanders of the combatant commands on a prioritized capabilities list; (D) key knowledge points that must be achieved to permit continuation of the program and to inform production and deployment decisions; and (E) how the Missile Defense Agency plans to improve the capability over time. (3) A cost estimate for the program element, including-- (A) a life cycle cost estimate; (B) program acquisition unit costs for the program element; (C) average procurement unit costs and program acquisition costs for the program element; and (D) an identification when the program joint cost analysis requirements description document is scheduled to be approved. (4) A test baseline summarizing the comprehensive test program for the program element outlined in the integrated master test plan. (c) Annual Reports on Acquisition Baselines- (1) ANNUAL REPORTS REQUIRED- Not later than February 15, 2011, and annually thereafter, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the acquisition baselines required by subsection (a). The first such report shall set forth the acquisition baselines, and each later report shall identify the significant changes or variances, if any, in any such baseline from any earlier report under this subsection. (2) FORM- Each report under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (d) Annual Reports on Missile Defense Executive Board Activities- The Director shall include in each report under subsection (c) a description of the activities of the Missile Defense Executive Board during the preceding fiscal year, including the following: (1) A list of each meeting of the Board during the preceding fiscal year. (2) The agenda and issues considered at each such meeting. (3) A description of any decisions or recommendations made by the Board at each such meeting. (a) Authority to Support Shared Early Warning- During fiscal years 2011 and 2012, the Secretary of Defense may carry out a program to provide a ballistic missile shared early warning capability for the United States and the Czech Republic. (b) Fiscal Year 2011 Funding Authorization- (1) Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or any other Act for fiscal year 2011 for Operation and Maintenance, Air Force, $1,700,000 may be available for the purposes described in subsection (a). (2) Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or any other Act for fiscal year 2011 for Other Procurement, Air Force, $500,000 may be available for the purposes described in subsection (a). (a) Report Required- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe. (b) Matters Included- The report under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A detailed explanation of-- (A) the analytic basis (including the analytic process and methodology) that led to the recommendation of the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff to pursue the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe, including the ability to defend deployed forces of the United States, allies, and partners in Europe, and the United States homeland, against the existing, emerging, and future threat from Iranian ballistic missiles in a timely and flexible manner; and (B) the planned defensive coverage of Europe provided by such missile defense. (2) A detailed explanation of the specific elements planned for each of the four phases of the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe, including schedules and parameters of planned deployments of missile defense systems at sea and on land, and the knowledge points or milestones that will be required prior to operational deployment of those elements. (3) A description of the factors and processes that will be used to determine the eventual numbers and locations of interceptors that will be deployed at sea and on land, and the concept of operations that will enable the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe to be operated in a flexible, adaptable, and survivable manner. (4) A description of the status of the development or production of the various elements of the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe, particularly the development of the standard missile-3, block IIA and block IIB interceptors, including the technical readiness levels of those systems under development and the plans for retiring the technical risks of such systems. (5) A description of the advances in technology that are expected to permit enhanced defensive capability of the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe, including airborne infrared sensor technology, space sensor technology, and enhanced battle management, command, control, and communications. (6) A discussion of how the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe will meet the operational needs of the commander of the United States European Command, and how it relates to plans to use a phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in other geographic regions. (7) An explanation of-- (A) the views of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization on the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe; and (B) how such missile defense fits into the current missile defense strategy of NATO. (c) Form- The report shall be in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (a) Independent Review and Assessment Required- The Secretary of Defense shall select an appropriate entity outside the Department of Defense to conduct an independent review and assessment of the ground-based midcourse defense system. (b) Elements- The review and assessment required by this section shall address the current plans of the Department of Defense with respect to the following: (1) The force structure and inventory levels necessary for the ground-based midcourse defense system to achieve the planned capabilities of that system, including an analysis of costs and potential advantages of deploying additional operational ground-based interceptor missiles. (2) The number of ground-based interceptor missiles necessary for operational assets, test assets (including developmental and operational test assets and aging and surveillance test assets), and spare missiles for the ground-based midcourse defense system. (3) The plan to maintain the operational effectiveness of the ground-based midcourse defense system over the course of its service life, including any modernization or capability enhancement efforts, and any sustainment efforts. (4) The plan for funding the development, production, deployment, testing, improvement, and sustainment of the ground-based midcourse defense system. (5) The plan for flight testing the ground-based midcourse defense system, including aging and surveillance tests to demonstrate the continuing effectiveness of the system over the course of its service life. (6) The plan for production of ground-based interceptor missiles necessary for operational test assets, aging and surveillance test assets, and spare missiles for the ground-based midcourse defense system. (c) Report- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the entity conducting the review and assessment under this section shall submit to the Secretary and the congressional defense committees a report containing-- (1) the results of the review and assessment; and (2) any recommendations on how the Department of Defense may improve upon its plans to ensure the availability, reliability, maintainability, supportability, and improvement of the ground-based midcourse defense system. Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 201(4) for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, the Secretary of Defense may provide up to $205,000,000 to the government of Israel for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system. Subtitle D--Reports (a) Report Required- Not later than January 15, 2011, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the Ground Combat Vehicle program of the Army. Such report shall include-- (1) the results of the analysis of alternatives conducted prior to milestone A, including any technical data; and (2) an explanation of any plans to adjust the requirements of the Ground Combat Vehicle program during the technology development phase of such program. (b) Form- The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (c) Limitation on Obligation of Funds- Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this or any other Act for fiscal year 2011 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Army, for development of the Ground Combat Vehicle, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date that is 30 days after the date on which the report is submitted under subsection (a). (a) Cost Benefit Analysis Required- (1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary of the Army shall conduct a cost benefit analysis of future munitions to be fired from the M1 Abrams series main battle tank to determine the proper investment to be made in tank munitions, including beyond line of sight technology. (2) ELEMENTS- The cost benefit analysis under paragraph (1) shall include-- (A) the predicted operational performance of future tank-fired munitions, including those incorporating beyond line of sight technology, based on the relevant modeling and simulation of future combat scenarios of the Army, including a detailed analysis on the suitability of each munition to address the full spectrum of targets across the entire range of the tank (including close range, mid-range, long-range, and beyond line of sight); (B) a detailed assessment of the projected costs to develop and field each tank-fired munition included in the analysis, including those incorporating beyond line of sight technology; and (C) a comparative analysis of each tank-fired munition included in the analysis, including suitability to address known capability gaps and overmatch against known and projected threats. (3) MUNITIONS INCLUDED- In conducting the cost benefit analysis under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall include, at a minimum, the Mid-Range Munition, the Advanced Kinetic Energy round, and the Advanced Multipurpose Program. (b) Briefing- Not later than April 15, 2011, the Secretary shall provide a detailed briefing to the congressional defense committees on the cost benefit analysis conducted under subsection (a). (a) Annual GAO Review- During the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on March 1, 2013, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct an annual review of the VH-(XX) aircraft acquisition program. (b) Annual Reports- (1) IN GENERAL- Not later than March 1 of each year beginning in 2011 and ending in 2013, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review of the VH-(XX) aircraft acquisition program conducted under subsection (a). (2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED- Each report on the review of the VH-(XX) aircraft acquisition program shall include the following: (A) The extent to which the program is meeting development and procurement cost, schedule, performance, and risk mitigation goals. (B) With respect to meeting the desired initial operational capability and full operational capability dates for the VH-(XX) aircraft, the progress and results of-- (i) developmental and operational testing of the aircraft; and (ii) plans for correcting deficiencies in aircraft performance, operational effectiveness, reliability, suitability, and safety. (C) An assessment of VH-(XX) aircraft procurement plans, production results, and efforts to improve manufacturing efficiency and supplier performance. (D) An assessment of the acquisition strategy of the VH-(XX) aircraft, including whether such strategy is in compliance with acquisition management best-practices and the acquisition policy and regulations of the Department of Defense. (E) A risk assessment of the integrated master schedule and the test and evaluation master plan of the VH-(XX) aircraft as it relates to-- (i) the probability of success; (ii) the funding required for such aircraft compared with the funding programmed; and (iii) development and production concurrency. (3) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION- In submitting to the congressional defense committees the first report under paragraph (1) and a report following any changes made by the Secretary of the Navy to the baseline documentation of the VH-(XX) aircraft acquisition program, the Comptroller General shall include, with respect to such program, an assessment of the sufficiency and objectivity of-- (A) the analysis of alternatives; (B) the initial capabilities document; (C) the capabilities development document; and (D) the systems requirement document. Subtitle E--Other Matters (a) Findings- Congress finds the following: (1) The next generation of weapons systems, battlefield sensors, and intelligence platforms will need to be lighter, more agile, consume less power, and have greater computational power, which can be achieved by decreasing the feature size of integrated circuits to the nanometer scale. (2) There is a growing concern in the Department of Defense and the United States intelligence community over the offshore shift in development and production of high capacity semiconductors. Greater reliance on providers of semiconductors in the United States high technology industry would help mitigate the security risks of such an offshore shift. (3) The development of new manufacturing technologies is recognized in the semiconductor industry as critical to the development of the next generation of integrated circuits. (b) Sense of Congress- It is the sense of Congress that-- (1) the United States should pursue research and development capabilities to take the lead in developing and producing the next generation of integrated circuits; and (2) the Department of Defense should continue to work with industry and academia in pursuing the research and development of advanced manufacturing techniques in support of the development of the next generation of integrated circuits needed for the requirements and specialized applications of the Department of Defense. (a) Pilot Program- The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Energy, may carry out a collaborative energy security pilot program involving one or more partnerships between one military installation and one national laboratory, for the purpose of evaluating and validating secure, salable microgrid components and systems for deployment. (b) Selection of Military Installation and National Laboratory- If the Secretary of Defense carries out a pilot program under this section, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy shall jointly select a military installation and a national laboratory for the purpose of carrying out the pilot program. In making such selections, the Secretaries shall consider each of the following: (1) A commitment to participate made by a military installation being considered for selection. (2) The findings and recommendations of relevant energy security assessments of military installations being considered for selection. (3) The availability of renewable energy sources at a military installation being considered for selection. (4) Potential synergies between the expertise and capabilities of a national laboratory being considered for selection and the infrastructure, interests, or other energy security needs of a military installation being considered for selection. (5) The effects of any utility tariffs, surcharges, or other considerations on the feasibility of enabling any excess electricity generated on a military installation being considered for selection to be sold or otherwise made available to the local community near the installation. (c) Program Elements- A pilot program under this section shall be carried out as follows: (1) Under the pilot program, the Secretaries shall evaluate and validate the performance of new energy technologies that may be incorporated into operating environments. (2) The pilot program shall involve collaboration with the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability of the Department of Energy and other offices and agencies within the Department of Energy, as appropriate, and the Environmental Security Technical Certification Program of the Department of Defense. (3) Under the pilot program, the Secretary of Defense shall investigate opportunities for any excess electricity created for the military installation to be sold or otherwise made available to the local community near the installation. (4) The Secretary of Defense shall use the results of the pilot program as the basis for informing key performance parameters and validating energy components and designs that could be implemented in various military installations across the country and at forward operating bases. (5) The pilot program shall support the effort of the Secretary of Defense to use the military as a test bed to demonstrate innovative energy technologies. (d) Implementation and Duration- If the Secretary of Defense carries out a pilot program under this section, such pilot program shall begin by not later than July 1, 2011, and shall be not less than three years in duration. (e) Reports- (1) INITIAL REPORT- If the Secretary of Defense carries out a pilot program under this section, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees by not later than October 1, 2011, an initial report that provides an update on the implementation of the pilot program, including an identification of the selected military installation and national laboratory partner and a description of technologies under evaluation. (2) FINAL REPORT- Not later than 90 days after completion of a pilot program under this section, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the pilot program, including any findings and recommendations of the Secretary. (f) Definitions- For purposes of this section: (1) The term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means-- (A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. (2) The term ‘microgrid’ means an integrated energy system consisting of interconnected loads and distributed energy resources (including generators, energy storage devices, and smart controls) that can operate with the utility grid or in an intentional islanding mode. (3) The term ‘national laboratory’ means-- (A) a national laboratory (as defined in section 2 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 ( (B) a national security laboratory (as defined in section 3281 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act ( (a) Pilot Program- The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program to develop and incorporate technology protection features in a designated system during the research and development phase of such system. (b) Annual Reports- Not later than December 31 of each year in which the Secretary carries out the pilot program established under this section, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program, including a list of each designated system included in the program. (c) Termination- The pilot program established under this section shall terminate on October 1, 2015. (d) Definitions- In this section: (1) The term ‘designated system’ means any system (including a major system, as defined in (2) The term ‘technology protection features’ means the technical modifications necessary to protect critical program information, including anti-tamper technologies and other systems engineering activities intended to prevent or delay exploitation of critical technologies in a designated system. TITLE III--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding. Sec. 311. Reimbursement of Environmental Protection Agency for certain costs in connection with the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant, Minnesota. Sec. 312. Payment to Environmental Protection Agency of stipulated penalties in connection with Naval Air Station, Brunswick, Maine. Sec. 313. Requirements related to the investigation of exposure to drinking water at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. Sec. 314. Comptroller General assessment on military environmental exposures. Sec. 321. Technical amendments to requirement for service contract inventory. Sec. 322. Repeal of conditions on expansion of functions performed under prime vendor contracts for depot-level maintenance and repair. Sec. 323. Prohibition on establishing goals or quotas for conversion of functions to performance by Department of Defense civilian employees. Sec. 331. Additional reporting requirements relating to corrosion prevention projects and activities. Sec. 332. Modification and repeal of certain reporting requirements. Sec. 333. Report on Air Sovereignty Alert mission. Sec. 334. Report on the SEAD/DEAD mission requirement for the Air Force. Sec. 335. Requirement to update study on strategic seaports. Sec. 341. Permanent authority to accept and use landing fees charged for use of domestic military airfields by civil aircraft. Sec. 342. Extension of Arsenal Support Program Initiative. Sec. 343. Limitation on obligation of funds for the Army Human Terrain System. Sec. 344. Limitation on obligation of funds pending submission of classified justification material. Sec. 345. Requirements for transferring aircraft within the Air Force inventory. Sec. 346. Commercial sale of small arms ammunition in excess of military requirements. Sec. 351. Expedited processing of background investigations for certain individuals. Sec. 352. Revision to authorities relating to transportation of civilian passengers and commercial cargoes by Department of Defense when space unavailable on commercial lines. Sec. 353. Technical correction to obsolete reference relating to use of flexible hiring authority to facilitate performance of certain Department of Defense functions by civilian employees. Sec. 354. Authority for payment of full replacement value for loss or damage to household goods in limited cases not covered by carrier liability. Sec. 355. Recovery of improperly disposed of Department of Defense property. Sec. 356. Operational readiness models. Sec. 357. Sense of Congress regarding continued importance of High-Altitude Aviation Training Site, Colorado. Sec. 358. Study of effects of new construction of obstructions on military installations and operations. Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, in amounts as follows: (1) For the Army, $33,921,165,000. (2) For the Navy, $38,232,943,000. (3) For the Marine Corps, $5,590,340,000. (4) For the Air Force, $36,822,516,000. (5) For Defense-wide activities, $30,562,619,000. (6) For the Army Reserve, $2,879,077,000. (7) For the Naval Reserve, $1,367,764,000. (8) For the Marine Corps Reserve, $285,234,000. (9) For the Air Force Reserve, $3,403,827,000. (10) For the Army National Guard, $6,621,704,000. (11) For the Air National Guard, $6,042,239,000. (12) For the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, $14,068,000. (13) For the Acquisition Development Workforce Fund, $217,561,000. (14) For Environmental Restoration, Army, $444,581,000. (15) For Environmental Restoration, Navy, $304,867,000. (16) For Environmental Restoration, Air Force, $502,653,000. (17) For Environmental Restoration, Defense-wide, $10,744,000. (18) For Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites, $296,546,000. (19) For Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid programs, $108,032,000. (20) For Cooperative Threat Reduction programs, $522,512,000. Subtitle B--Energy and Environmental Provisions (a) Authority to Reimburse- (1) TRANSFER AMOUNT- Using funds described in subsection (b) and notwithstanding (2) PURPOSE OF REIMBURSEMENT- The amount authorized to be transferred under paragraph (1) is to reimburse the Environmental Protection Agency for costs the Agency incurred relating to the response actions performed at the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant, Minnesota. (3) INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT- The reimbursement described in paragraph (2) is intended to satisfy certain terms of the interagency agreement entered into by the Department of the Army and the Environmental Protection Agency for the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant that took effect in December 1987 and that provided for the recovery of expenses by the Agency from the Department of the Army. (b) Source of Funds- The transfer of funds authorized in subsection (a) shall be made using funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for operation and maintenance for Environmental Restoration, Army. (a) Authority to Transfer Funds- From amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for the Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005, and notwithstanding (b) Purpose of Transfer- The purpose of a transfer made under subsection (a) is to satisfy a stipulated penalty assessed by the Environmental Protection Agency on June 12, 2008, against Naval Air Station, Brunswick, Maine, for the failure of the Navy to sample certain monitoring wells in a timely manner pursuant to a schedule included in the Federal facility agreement for Naval Air Station, Brunswick, which was entered into by the Secretary of the Navy and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency on October 19, 1990. (c) Acceptance of Payment- If the Secretary of Defense makes a transfer authorized under subsection (a), the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall accept the amount transferred as payment in full of the penalty referred to in subsection (b). (a) Findings- Congress makes the following findings: (1) The Department of the Navy and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (hereinafter in this section referred to as ‘ATSDR’) have been working together for almost two decades to identify the possible effects of exposure to contaminated drinking water at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. (2) Multiple studies have been conducted, and are being conducted, which require significant amounts of data and historical documentation, requiring the Department of the Navy and ATSDR to have close collaboration and open access to information. (3) In June 2010, the Department of the Navy and ATSDR established the Camp Lejeune Data Mining Technical Workgroup to identify and inventory information and data relevant to the ongoing scientific research. (b) Requirements- (1) ATSDR ACCESS TO DATA- By not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall ensure that the inventory created by the Camp Lejeune Data Mining Technical Workgroup is accurate and complete and that ATSDR has full access to all of the documents and data listed therein as needed. (2) AVAILABILITY OF NEW AND NEWLY DISCOVERED DOCUMENTS- If after the date of enactment of this Act the Secretary of the Navy generates any new document, record, or electronic data, or comes into possession of any existing document, record, or electronic data not previously provided in the Camp Lejeune Data Mining Technical Workgroup, the Secretary of the Navy shall make such information immediately available to ATSDR with an electronic inventory incorporating the newly located or generated document, record, or electronic data. (3) LIMITATION ON ADJUDICATION OF CLAIMS- None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2011 may be used to adjudicate any administrative claim filed with the Department of the Navy regarding water contamination at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, until at least 45 days after the date on which the Secretary of the Navy notifies the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives of the intention of the Secretary to adjudicate the claim. (a) Findings- Congress makes the following findings: (1) There have been various reports of the exposure of current and former members of the Armed Forces, their dependents, and civilian employees to environmental hazards while living and working on military installations. (2) There is the need to better understand existing Department of Defense policies and procedures for addressing possible environmental exposures at military installations, determining any correlation between such an exposure and a subsequent health condition, and handling claims and potential compensation. (3) While many of these possible exposures have been studied and evaluated, the extent to which those exposures caused or contributed to the short- and long-term health conditions of current and former members of the Armed Forces, their dependents, and civilian employees remains largely unknown. (4) As for these possible exposures and the link between the exposure and subsequent health conditions, there may be better ways for the Federal Government to evaluate, address and, as warranted, provide health benefits or possible compensation as a remedy to these potential exposures. (b) Comptroller General Assessment Required- The Comptroller General of the United States shall carry out an assessment of possible exposures to environmental hazards on military installations that includes the following: (1) An identification of the policies and processes by which the Department of Defense and the military departments respond to environmental hazards on military installations and possible exposures and determine if there is a standard framework. (2) An identification of the existing processes available to current and former members of the Armed Forces, their dependents, and civilian employees to seek compensation and health benefits for exposures to environmental hazards on military installations. (3) A comparison of the processes identified under paragraph (2) with other potential options or methods for providing health benefits or compensation to individuals for injuries that may have resulted from environmental hazards on military installations. (4) An examination of what is known about the advantages and disadvantages of other potential options or methods as well as any shortfalls in the current processes. (5) Recommendations for any administrative or legislative action that the Comptroller General deems appropriate in the context of the assessment. (c) Report- Not later than January 1, 2012, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the findings and recommendations, as appropriate, of the Comptroller General with respect to the assessment conducted under subsection (b). (d) Coordination- In carrying out subsection (b), the Comptroller General shall receive comments from the Secretary of Defense and others, as appropriate. (e) Construction- Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to impede, encroach, or delay-- (1) any studies, reviews, or assessments of any actual or potential environmental exposures at any military installation, including the studies included in the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry’s Annual Plan of Work regarding the water contamination at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina; (2) the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry’s statutory obligations, including its obligations under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ( (3) the remediation of any environmental contamination or hazard at any military installation. (f) Military Installation Defined- In this section, the term ‘military installation’ has the meaning given that term in Subtitle C--Workplace and Depot Issues (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); (2) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)-- (A) by striking the second sentence; (B) by inserting after the first sentence the following new sentence: ‘The guidance for compiling the inventory shall be issued by the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, as follows:’; and (C) by inserting after the sentence added by subparagraph (B) the following: ‘(A) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, as supported by the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), shall be responsible for developing guidance for-- ‘(i) the collection of data regarding functions and missions performed by contractors in a manner that is comparable to the manpower data elements used in inventories of functions performed by Department of Defense employees; and ‘(ii) the calculation of contractor manpower equivalents in a manner that is comparable to the calculation of full-time equivalents for use in inventories of functions performed by Department of Defense employees. ‘(B) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall be responsible for developing guidance on other data elements and implementing procedures.’; (3) by inserting after subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), as added by paragraph (2), the following: ‘(2) The entry for an activity on an inventory under this subsection shall include, for the fiscal year covered by such entry, the following:’; and (4) in paragraph (2), as redesignated by paragraph (3), by striking subparagraph (E) and inserting the following new subparagraph (E): ‘(E) The number of contractor employees, expressed as full-time equivalents for direct labor, using direct labor hours and associated cost data collected from contractors (except that estimates may be used where such data is not available and cannot reasonably be made available in a timely manner for the purpose of the inventory).’. Section 346 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 ( (a) Prohibition- The Secretary of Defense may not establish, apply, or enforce any numerical goal, target, or quota for the conversion of Department of Defense functions to performance by Department of Defense civilian employees, unless such goal, target, or quota is based on considered research and analysis, as required by section 235, 2330a, or 2463 of title 10, United States Code. (b) Decisions to Insource- In deciding which functions should be converted to performance by Department of Defense civilian employees pursuant to (c) Reports- (1) REPORT TO CONGRESS- Not later than March 31, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the decisions with respect to the conversion of functions to performance by Department of Defense civilian employees made during fiscal year 2010. Such report shall identify, for each such decision-- (A) the agency or service of the Department involved in the decision; (B) the basis and rationale for the decision; and (C) the number of contractor employees whose functions were converted to performance by Department of Defense civilian employees. (2) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW- Not later than 120 days after the submittal of the report under paragraph (1), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the report. (d) Construction- Nothing in this section shall be construed-- (1) to preclude the Secretary of Defense from establishing, applying, and enforcing goals for the conversion of acquisition functions and other critical functions to performance by Department of Defense civilian employees, where such goals are based on considered research and analysis; or (2) to require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a cost comparison before making a decision to convert any acquisition function or other critical function to performance by Department of Defense civilian employees, where factors other than cost serve as a basis for the Secretary’s decision. Subtitle D--Reports (1) in paragraph (1)-- (A) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘The’ and inserting ‘For the fiscal year covered by the report and the preceding fiscal year, the’; and (B) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: ‘(E) For the fiscal year covered by the report and the preceding fiscal year, the amount of funds requested in the budget for each project or activity described in subsection (d) compared to the funding requirements for the project or activity.’; (2) in paragraph (2)(B), by inserting before the period at the end the following: ‘, including the annex to the report described in paragraph (3)’; and (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(3) Each report under this section shall include, in an annex to the report, a copy of the annual corrosion report most recently submitted by the corrosion control and prevention executive of each military department under section 903(b)(5) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( (a) Prioritization of Funds- Subsection (a) of section 323 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 ( (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘the global war on terrorism’ and inserting ‘overseas contingency operations’; and (2) in paragraph (2)-- (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘units transforming to modularity’ and inserting ‘modular units’; and (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘2012’ and inserting ‘2015’. (b) Budget Information- Subsection (b) of such section is amended-- (1) in paragraph (2)-- (A) in subparagraph (A)-- (i) by striking ‘the global war on terrorism’ and inserting ‘overseas contingency operations’; and (ii) by inserting ‘and’ at the end; (B) in subparagraph (B)-- (i) in clause (i), by striking ‘units transforming to modularity’ and inserting ‘modular units’; and (ii) by striking ‘; and’ at the end and inserting a period; and (C) by striking subparagraph (C); and (2) by striking paragraph (3). (c) Annual Report on Army Progress- Subsection (c) of such section is amended-- (1) by striking paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), and (7); (2) by redesignating paragraphs (8) and (9) as subparagraphs (D) and (F), respectively; (3) by submitting ‘(1)’ before ‘On the date’; (4) in paragraph (1), as designated by paragraph (3) of this subsection, by striking ‘in meeting’ and all that follows through ‘shall be itemized’ and inserting ‘in fulfilling the key enabler equipment requirements of modular units and in repairing, recapitalizing, and replacing equipment and materiel used in support of overseas contingency operations underway as of the date of such report, and associated sustainment. Any information included in the report shall be itemized’; (5) by striking ‘Each such report’ and all that follows through the colon and inserting the following: ‘(2) Each such report shall include the following: ‘(A) An assessment of the key enabler equipment and personnel of the Army, including-- ‘(i) a comparison of-- ‘(I) the authorized level of key en abler equipment; ‘(II) the level of key enabler equipment on hand; and ‘(III) the planned purchases of key enabler equipment as set forth in the future-years defense program submitted with the budget for such fiscal year; ‘(ii) a comparison of the authorized and actual personnel levels for personnel with key enabler personnel specialities with the requirements for key enabler personnel specialties; ‘(iii) an identification of any shortfalls indicated by the comparisons in clauses (i) and (ii); and ‘(iv) an assessment of the number and type of key enabler equipment that the Army projects it will have on hand by the end of such future-years defense program that will require repair, recapitalization, or replacement at or be fore the end of the time period covered by such future-years defense program (which assessment shall account for additional repair, recapitalization, or replacement resulting from use of key enabler equipment in overseas contingency operations). ‘(B) If an assessment under subparagraph (A) identifies shortfalls that will exist within the period covered by the future-years defense program submitted in such fiscal year, an identification of the risks associated with such shortfalls and mitigation strategies to address such risks. ‘(C) A schedule for the accomplishment of the purposes set forth in paragraph (1).’; (6) in paragraph (2), as amended by paragraphs (2) and (5) of this subsection, by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following new subparagraph: ‘(E) A description of the status of the development of doctrine on how modular combat, functional, and support forces will train, be sustained, and fight.’; and (7) in subparagraph (F) of paragraph (2) as redesignated by paragraphs (2) and (5) of this subsection, by striking ‘paragraphs (1) through (8)’ and inserting ‘subparagraphs (A) through (E)’. (d) Annual Comptroller General on Army Progress- Subsection (d) of such section is amended to read as follows: ‘(d) Annual Comptroller General Report on Army Progress- Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Secretary of the Army submits a report under subsection (c), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the Comptroller General’s review of such report. Each report under this subsection shall include such information and recommendations as the Comptroller General considers appropriate in light of such review.’. (e) Definitions- Such section is further amended-- (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and (2) by inserting after subsection (d), as amended by subsection (d) of this section, the following new subsection (e): ‘(e) Definitions- In this section: ‘(1) The term ‘contingency operation’ has the meaning given that term in ‘(2) The term ‘key enabler’, in the case of equipment or personnel, means equipment or personnel, as the case may be, that make a modular force or unit as capable or more capable than the non-modular force or unit it replaced, including the following: ‘(A) Equipment such as tactical and high frequency radio, tactical wheeled vehicles, battle command systems, unmanned aerial vehicles, all-source analysis systems, analysis and control elements, fire support sensor systems, firefinder radar, joint network nodes, long-range advanced scout surveillance systems, Trojan Spirit systems (or any successor system), and any other equipment items identified by the Army as making a modular force or unit as capable or more capable than the non-modular force or unit it replaced. ‘(B) Personnel in specialties needed to operate or support the equipment specified in subparagraph (A) and personnel in specialties relating to civil affairs, communication and information systems operation, explosive ordinance disposal, military intelligence, psychological operations, and any other personnel specialties identified by the Army as making a modular force or unit as capable or more capable than the non-modular force or unit it replaced.’. (f) Termination of Report Requirement- Subsection (f) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (e)(1) of this section, is further amended by striking ‘fiscal year 2012’ and inserting ‘fiscal year 2015’. (g) Repeal of Report on Disposition of Reserve Equipment- Title III of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 ( (h) Repeal of Report on Readiness of Ground Forces- Title III of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (a) Report Required- Not later than March 1, 2011, the Commander of the United States Northern Command and the North American Aerospace Defense Command shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on the Air Sovereignty Alert (hereinafter in this section referred to as ‘ASA’) mission and Operation Noble Eagle. (b) Consultation- The Commander shall consult with the Director of the National Guard Bureau who shall review and provide independent analysis and comments on the report required under subsection (a). (c) Contents of Report- The report required under subsection (a) shall include each of the following: (1) An evaluation of the ASA mission and of Operation Noble Eagle. (2) An evaluation of each of the following: (A) The current ability to perform the ASA mission with respect to training, equipment, and basing. (B) Any current deficiencies in the ASA mission. (C) Any changes in threats that would require any change in training, equipment, and basing to effectively support the ASA mission. (D) An evaluation of whether the ASA mission is fully resourced with respect to funding, personnel, and aircraft. (E) A description of the coverage of ASA and Operation Noble Eagle units with respect to-- (i) population centers covered; and (ii) targets of value covered, including symbolic (including national monuments, sports venues, and centers of commerce), critical infrastructure (including power plants, ports, dams, bridges, and telecommunication nodes), and national security (including military bases and organs of government) targets. (F) An unclassified, notional area of responsibility conforming to the unclassified response time of the unit represented graphically on a map and detailing the total population and number of targets of value covered, as described in subparagraph (E). (3) The status of the implementation of the recommendations made in the Government Accountability Office report entitled ‘Actions Needed to Improve Management of Air Sovereignty Alert Operations to Protect U.S. Airspace’ (GAO-09-184). (d) Form of Report- The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. (a) Report Required- Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Service of the House of Representatives a report describing the feasibility and desirability of designating the Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses/Destruction of Enemy Air Defenses (hereinafter in this section referred to as ‘SEAD/DEAD’) mission as a responsibility of the Air National Guard. (b) Contents of Report- The report required under subsection (a) shall include each of the following: (1) An evaluation of the SEAD/DEAD mission, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) An evaluation of the following with respect to the SEAD/DEAD mission: (A) The current ability of the Air National Guard to perform the mission with regards to training, equipment, funding, and basing. (B) Any current deficiencies of the Air National Guard to perform the mission, including range infrastructure or other improvements needed to support peacetime training and readiness. (C) The corrective actions and costs required to address any deficiencies described in subparagraph (B). (c) Consultation- The Secretary of the Air Force shall consult with the Director of the National Guard Bureau who shall review and provide independent analysis and comments on the report required under subsection (a). Subtitle E--Limitations and Extensions of Authority (a) In General- Chapter 159 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: ‘(a) Authority- The Secretary of a military department may impose landing fees for the use by civil aircraft of domestic military airfields under the jurisdiction of that Secretary and may use any fees received under this section as a source of funding for the operation and maintenance of airfields of that department. ‘(b) Uniform Landing Fees- The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe the amount of the landing fees that may be imposed under this section. Such fees shall be uniform among the military departments. ‘(c) Use of Proceeds- Amounts received for a fiscal year in payment of landing fees imposed under this section for the use of a military airfield shall be credited to the appropriation that is available for that fiscal year for the operation and maintenance of that military airfield, shall be merged with amounts in the appropriation to which credited, and shall be available for that military airfield for the same period and purposes as the appropriation is available. ‘(d) Limitation- The Secretary of a military department shall determine whether consideration for a landing fee has been received in a lease, license, or other real estate agreement for an airfield and shall use such a determination to offset appropriate amounts imposed under subsection (a) for that airfield.’. (b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: ‘2697. Acceptance and use of landing fees charged for use of domestic military airfields by civil aircraft.’. Section 343 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 ( (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘2011’ and inserting ‘2012’; and (2) in subsection (g)(1), by striking ‘2011’ and inserting ‘2012’. (a) Limitation- Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Human Terrain System (hereinafter in this section referred to as the ‘HTS’) that are described in subsection (b), not more than 85 percent of the amounts remaining unobligated as of the date of enactment of this Act may be obligated until the Secretary of the Army submits to the congressional defense committees each of the following: (1) A validation of all HTS requirements, including any prior joint urgent operational needs statements. (2) A certification that policies, procedures, and guidance are in place to protect the integrity of social science researchers participating in HTS, including ethical guidelines and human studies research procedures. (b) Covered Authorizations or Appropriations- The amounts authorized to be appropriated described in this subsection are amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011, including such amounts authorized to be appropriated for oversees contingency operations, for-- (1) operation and maintenance for HTS; (2) procurement for Mapping the Human Terrain hardware and software; and (3) research, development, test, and evaluation for Mapping the Human Terrain hardware and software. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated in this title for fiscal year 2011 for the Office of the Secretary of Defense, of the amount that corresponds with budget activity four, line 270, in the budget transmitted to Congress by the President for fiscal year 2011, not more than 90 percent may be obligated until 15 days after the information cited in the classified annex accompanying this Act relating to the provision of classified justification material to Congress is provided to the congressional defense committees. (a) Requirements- In proposing the transfer of ownership of any aircraft from ownership by a reserve component of the Air Force to ownership by a regular component of the Air Force, including such a transfer to be made on a temporary basis, the Secretary of the Air Force shall ensure that a written agreement regarding such transfer of ownership has been entered into between the Director of the Air National Guard, the Commander of the Air Force Reserve Command, and the Chief of Staff of the Air Force. Any such agreement shall specify each of the following: (1) The number of and type of aircraft to be transferred. (2) In the case of any aircraft transferred on a temporary basis-- (A) the schedule under which the aircraft will be returned to the ownership of the reserve component; (B) a description of the condition, including the estimated remaining service life, in which any such aircraft will be returned to the reserve component; and (C) a description of the allocation of resources, including the designation of responsibility for funding aircraft operation and maintenance and a detailed description of budgetary responsibilities, for the period for which the ownership of the aircraft is transferred to the regular component. (3) The designation of responsibility for funding depot maintenance requirements or modifications to the aircraft generated as a result of the transfer, including any such requirements and modifications required during the period for which the ownership of the aircraft is transferred to the regular component. (4) Any location from which the aircraft will be transferred. (5) The effects on manpower that such a transfer may have at any facility identified under paragraph (4). (6) The effects on the skills and proficiencies of the reserve component personnel affected by the transfer. (7) Any other items the Director of the Air National Guard or the Commander of the Air Force Reserve Command determines are necessary in order to execute such a transfer. (b) Submittal of Agreements to Congress- The Secretary of the Air Force may not take any action to transfer the ownership of an aircraft as described in subsection (a) until the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees an agreement entered into pursuant to such subsection regarding the transfer of ownership of the aircraft. (a) Commercial Sale of Small Arms Ammunition- Small arms ammunition and ammunition components in excess of military requirements, including fired cartridge cases, which are not otherwise prohibited from commercial sale or certified by the Secretary of Defense as unserviceable or unsafe, may not be demilitarized or destroyed and shall be made available for commercial sale. (b) Deadline for Guidance- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance to ensure compliance with subsection (a). Not later than 15 days after issuing such guidance, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a letter of compliance providing notice of such guidance. (c) Preference- No small arms ammunition and ammunition components in excess of military requirements may be made available for commercial sale under this section before such ammunition and ammunition components are offered for transfer or purchase, as authorized by law, to another Federal department or agency or for sale to State and local law enforcement, firefighting, homeland security, and emergency management agencies pursuant to Subtitle F--Other Matters (a) Expedited Processing of Security Clearances- (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following new subsection (a): ‘(a) Expedited Process- The Secretary of Defense may prescribe a process for expediting the completion of the background investigations necessary for granting security clearances for-- ‘(1) Department of Defense personnel and Department of Defense contractor personnel who are engaged in sensitive duties that are critical to the national security; and ‘(2) any individual who-- ‘(A) submits an application for a position as an employee of the Department of Defense for which-- ‘(i) the individual is qualified; and ‘(ii) a security clearance is required; and ‘(B) is-- ‘(i) a member of the armed forces who was retired or separated, or is expected to be retired or separated, for physical disability pursuant to chapter 61 of this title; ‘(ii) the spouse of a member of the armed forces who retires or is separated, after the date of the enactment of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011, for a physical disability as a result of a wound, injuries or illness incurred or aggravated in the line of duty (as determined by the Secretary concerned); or ‘(iii) the spouse of a member of the armed forces who dies, after the date of the enactment of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011, as a result of a wound, injury, or illness incurred or aggravated in the line of duty (as determined by the Secretary concerned).’; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: ‘(f) Use of Appropriated Funds- The Secretary of Defense may use funds authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance to conduct background investigations under this section for individuals described in subsection (a)(2).’. (b) Effective Date- The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to a background investigation conducted after the date of the enactment of this Act. (a) Transportation on DOD Vehicles and Aircraft- Subsection (a) of (1) by inserting ‘Authority- ’ before ‘Whenever’; and (2) by inserting ‘, vehicles, or aircraft’ in the first sentence after ‘vessels’ both places it appears. (b) Amounts Charged for Transportation in Emergency, Disaster, or Humanitarian Response Cases- (1) LIMITATION ON AMOUNTS CHARGED- The second sentence of subsection (a) of such section is amended by inserting before the period the following: ‘, except that in the case of transportation provided in response to an emergency, a disaster, or a request for humanitarian assistance, any amount charged for such transportation may not exceed the cost of providing the transportation’. (2) CREDITING OF RECEIPTS- Subsection (b) of such section is amended by striking ‘Amounts’ and inserting ‘Crediting of Receipts- Any amount received under this section with respect to transportation provided in response to an emergency, a disaster, or a request for humanitarian assistance may be credited to the appropriation, fund, or account used in incurring the obligation for which such amount is received. In all other cases, amounts’. (c) Transportation During Contingencies or Disaster Responses- Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: ‘(c) Transportation of Allied Personnel During Contingencies or Disaster Responses- During the 5-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011, when space is available on vessels, vehicles, or aircraft operated by the Department of Defense and the Secretary of Defense determines that operations in the area of a contingency operation or disaster response would be facilitated if allied forces or civilians were to be transported using such vessels, vehicles, or aircraft, the Secretary may provide such transportation on a noninterference basis, without charge.’. (d) Conforming Amendment- Section 2648 of such title is amended by inserting ‘, vehicles, or aircraft’ after ‘vessels’ in the matter preceding paragraph (1). (e) Technical Amendments- (1) The heading of section 2648 of such title is amended to read as follows: (2) The heading of section 2649 of such title is amended to read as follows: (f) Clerical Amendments- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 157 of such title is amended by striking the items relating to sections 2648 and 2649 and inserting the following new items: ‘2648. Persons and supplies: sea, land, and air transportation. ‘2649. Civilian passengers and commercial cargoes: transportation on Department of Defense vessels, vehicles, and aircraft.’. (a) Claims Authority- (1) IN GENERAL- Chapter 163 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: ‘The Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the military departments, in paying a claim under section 3721 of title 31 arising from loss or damage to household goods stored or transported at the expense of the Department of Defense, may pay the claim on the basis of full replacement value in any of the following cases in which reimbursement for the full replacement value for the loss or damage is not available directly from a carrier under section 2636a of this title: ‘(1) A case in which-- ‘(A) the lost or damaged goods were stored or transported under a contract, tender, or solicitation in accordance with section 2636a of this title that requires the transportation service provider to settle claims on the basis of full replacement value; and ‘(B) the loss or damage occurred under circumstances that exclude the transportation service provider from liability. ‘(2) A case in which-- ‘(A) the loss or damage occurred while the lost or damaged goods were in the possession of an ocean carrier that was transporting, loading, or unloading the goods under a Department of Defense contract for ocean carriage; and ‘(B) the land-based portions of the transportation were under contracts, in accordance with section 2636a of this title, that require the land carriers to settle claims on the basis of full replacement value. ‘(3) A case in which-- ‘(A) the lost or damaged goods were transported or stored under a contract or solicitation that requires at least one of the transportation service providers or carriers that handled the shipment to settle claims on the basis of full replacement value pursuant to section 2636a of this title; ‘(B) the lost or damaged goods have been in the custody of more than one independent contractor or transportation service provider; and ‘(C) a claim submitted to the delivering transportation service provider or carrier is denied in whole or in part because the loss or damage occurred while the lost or damaged goods were in the custody of a prior transportation service provider or carrier or government entity.’. (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT- The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: ‘2740. Property loss: reimbursement of members and civilian employees for full replacement value of household effects when contractor reimbursement not available.’. (b) Effective Date- (a) In General- Chapter 165 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: ‘(a) Prohibition- No member of the armed forces, civilian employee of the United States Government, contractor personnel, or other person may sell, lend, pledge, barter, or give any clothing, arms, articles, equipment, or other military or Department of Defense property except in accordance with the statutes and regulations governing Government property. ‘(b) Transfer of Title or Interest Ineffective- If property has been disposed of in violation of subsection (a), the person holding the property has no right or title to, or interest in, the property. ‘(c) Authority for Seizure of Improperly Disposed of Property- If any person is in the possession of military or Department of Defense property without right or title to, or interest in, the property because it has been disposed of in material violation of subsection (a), any Federal, State, or local law enforcement official may seize the property wherever found. Unless an exception to the warrant requirement under the fourth amendment to the Constitution applies, seizure may be made only-- ‘(1) pursuant to-- ‘(A) a warrant issued by the district court of the United States for the district in which the property is located, or for the district in which the person in possession of the property resides or is subject to service; or ‘(B) pursuant to an order by such court, issued after a determination of improper transfer under subsection (e); and ‘(2) after such a court has issued such a warrant or order. ‘(d) Inapplicability to Certain Property- Subsections (b) and (c) shall not apply to-- ‘(1) property on public display by public or private collectors or museums in secured exhibits; or ‘(2) property in the collection of any museum or veterans organization or held in a private collection for the purpose of public display, provided that any such property, the possession of which could undermine national security or create a hazard to public health or safety, has been fully demilitarized. ‘(e) Determinations of Violations- (1) The district court of the United States for the district in which the property is located, or the district in which the person in possession of the property resides or is subject to service, shall have jurisdiction, regardless of the current approximated or estimated value of the property, to determine whether property was disposed of in violation of subsection (a). Any such determination shall be by a preponderance of the evidence. ‘(2) Except as provided in paragraph (3), in the case of property, the possession of which could undermine national security or create a hazard to public health or safety, the determination under paragraph (1) may be made after the seizure of the property, as long as the United States files an action seeking such determination within 90 days after seizure of the property. If the person from whom the property is seized is found to have been lawfully in possession of the property and the return of the property could undermine national security or create a hazard to public health or safety, the Secretary of Defense shall reimburse the person for the market value for the property. ‘(3) Paragraph (2) shall not apply to any firearm, ammunition, or ammunition component, or firearm part or accessory that is not prohibited for commercial sale. ‘(f) Delivery of Seized Property- Any law enforcement official who seizes property under subsection (c) and is not authorized to retain it for the United States shall deliver the property to an authorized member of the armed forces or other authorized official of the Department of Defense or the Department of Justice. ‘(g) Scope of Enforcement- This section shall apply to the following: ‘(1) Any military or Department of Defense property disposed of on or after the date of the enactment of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 in a manner that is not in accordance with statutes and regulations governing Government property in effect at the time of the disposal of such property. ‘(2) Any significant military equipment disposed of on or after January 1, 2002, in a manner that is not in accordance with statutes and regulations governing Government property in effect at the time of the disposal of such significant military equipment. ‘(h) Rule of Construction- The authority of this section is in addition to any other authority of the United States with respect to property to which the United States may have right or title. ‘(i) Definitions- In this section: ‘(1) The term ‘significant military equipment’ means defense articles on the United States Munitions List for which special export controls are warranted because of their capacity for substantial military utility or capability. ‘(2) The term ‘museum’ has the meaning given that term in section 273(1) of the Museum Services Act ( ‘(3) The term ‘fully demilitarized’ means, with respect to equipment or material, the destruction of the military offensive or defensive advantages inherent in the equipment or material, including, at a minimum, the destruction or disabling of key points of such equipment or material, such as the fuselage, tail assembly, wing spar, armor, radar and radomes, armament and armament provisions, operating systems and software, and classified items. ‘(4) The term ‘veterans organization’ means any organization recognized by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for the representation of veterans under section 5902 of title 38.’. (b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 165 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2789 the following new item: ‘2790. Recovery of improperly disposed of Department of Defense property.’. (a) Review of Models- Not later than September 30, 2011, the Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall conduct a study to identify, compare, and contrast the budget preparation tools and models used by each of the military departments to determine funding levels for operational readiness requirements during the programming, planning, budgeting, and execution process and report the findings to the congressional defense committees. In carrying out such study, the Director shall-- (1) assess whether any additional or alternative verified and validated operational readiness model used by any military department for budgeting for flying or ground equipment hours, steaming days, equipment operations, equipment maintenance, and depot maintenance should be incorporated into the budget process of that military department; and (2) identify any shortcomings or deficiencies in the approach of each military department in building the operational readiness budget for that department. (b) Congressional Briefing- Not later than April 1, 2012, in conjunction with the submission by the Secretary of Defense of the budget justification documents for fiscal year 2013, the Secretaries of each of the military departments, or designated representatives thereof, shall brief the congressional defense committees on their respective responses to the study conducted by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office. Each such briefing shall include-- (1) a description of how the military department concerned plans to address any deficiencies in the development of the operational readiness budget of such department identified in the study; and (2) a description of how the modeling tools identified in the study could be used by the military department to improve the development of the operational readiness budget for the department. (a) Findings- Congress makes the following findings: (1) The High-Altitude Aviation Training Site in Gypsum, Colorado, is the only Department of Defense aviation school that provides an opportunity for rotor-wing military pilots to train in high-altitude, mountainous terrain, under full gross weight and power management operations. (2) The High-Altitude Aviation Training Site is operated by the Colorado Army National Guard and is available to pilots of all branches of the Armed Forces and to pilots of allied countries. (b) Sense of Congress- It is the sense of Congress that-- (1) the High-Altitude Army Aviation Training Site continues to be critically important to ensuring the readiness and capabilities of rotor-wing military pilots; and (2) the Department of Defense should take all appropriate actions to prevent encroachment on the High-Altitude Army Aviation Training Site. (a) Objective- It shall be an objective of the Department of Defense to ensure that the robust development of renewable energy sources and the increased resiliency of the commercial electrical grid may move forward in the United States, while minimizing or mitigating any adverse impacts on military operations and readiness. (b) Designation of Senior Official and Lead Organization- (1) DESIGNATION- Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall designate a senior official of the Department of Defense, and a lead organization of the Department of Defense, to-- (A) serve as the executive agent to carry out the review required by subsection (d); (B) serve as a clearinghouse to coordinate Department of Defense review of applications for projects filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to (C) accelerate the development of planning tools necessary to determine the acceptability to the Department of Defense of proposals included in an application for a project submitted pursuant to such section. (2) RESOURCES- The Secretary shall ensure that the senior official and lead organization designated under paragraph (1) are assigned such personnel and resources as the Secretary considers appropriate to carry out this section. (c) Initial Actions- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the senior official and lead organization designated pursuant to subsection (b), shall-- (1) conduct a preliminary review of each application for a project filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to (A) assess the likely scope and duration of any adverse impact of such project on military operations and readiness; and (B) identify any feasible and affordable actions that could be taken in the immediate future by the Department, the developer of such project, or others to mitigate such adverse impact and to minimize risks to national security while allowing such project to proceed with development; (2) develop, in coordination with other departments and agencies of the Federal Government, an integrated review process to ensure timely notification and consideration of projects filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to (3) establish procedures for the Department of Defense for the coordinated consideration of and response to a request for a review received from State and local officials or the developer of a renewable energy development or other energy project, including guidance to personnel at each military installation in the United States on how to initiate such procedures and ensure a coordinated Department response while seeking to fulfil the objective under subsection (a); and (4) develop procedures for conducting early outreach to parties carrying out projects filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to (d) Comprehensive Review- (1) STRATEGY REQUIRED- Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the senior official and lead organization designated pursuant to subsection (b), shall develop a comprehensive strategy for addressing the military impacts of projects filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to (2) ELEMENTS- In developing the strategy required by paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall-- (A) assess of the magnitude of interference posed by projects filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to (B) identify geographic areas selected as proposed locations for projects filed, or which may be filed in the future, with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to (C) specifically identify feasible and affordable long-term actions that may be taken to mitigate adverse impacts of projects filed, or which may be filed in the future, with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to (i) investment priorities of the Department of Defense with respect to research and development; (ii) modifications to military operations to accommodate applications for such projects; (iii) recommended upgrades or modifications to existing systems or procedures by the Department of Defense; (iv) acquisition of new systems by the Department and other departments and agencies of the Federal Government and timelines for fielding such new systems; and (v) modifications to the projects for which such applications are filed, including changes in size, location, or technology. (e) Department of Defense Hazard Assessment- (1) PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT- The procedures established pursuant to subsection (c) shall ensure that not later than 30 days after receiving a proper application for a project filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to (3) CONGRESSIONAL NOTICE REQUIREMENT- Not later than 30 days after making a determination of unacceptable risk under paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on such determination and the basis for such determination. Such a report shall include an explanation of the operational impact that led to the determination, a discussion of the mitigation options considered, and an explanation of why the mitigation options were not feasible or did not resolve the conflict. (A) The Deputy Secretary of Defense. (B) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. (C) The Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. (f) Reports- (1) REPORT TO CONGRESS- Not later than March 15 each year from 2011 through 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the actions taken by the Department of Defense during the preceding year to implement this section and the comprehensive strategy developed pursuant to this section. (2) CONTENTS OF REPORT- Each report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include-- (A) the results of a review carried out by the Secretary of Defense of any projects filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to (i) that the Secretary of Defense has determined would result in an unacceptable risk to the national security; and (ii) for which the Secretary of Defense has recommended to the Secretary of Transportation that a hazard determination be issued; (B) an assessment of the risk associated with the loss or modifications of military training routes and a quantification of such risk; (C) an assessment of the risk associated with solar power and similar systems as to the effects of glint on military readiness; (D) an assessment of the risk associated with electromagnetic interference on military readiness, including the effects of testing and evaluation ranges; (E) an assessment of any risks posed by the development of projects filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to (F) a description of the distance from a military installation that the Department of Defense will use to prescreen applicants under (g) Authority to Accept Contributions of Funds- The Secretary of Defense is authorized to accept a voluntary contribution of funds from an applicant for a project filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to (h) Effect of Department of Defense Hazard Assessment- An action taken pursuant to this section shall not be considered to be a substitute for any assessment or determination required of the Secretary of Transportation under (i) Savings Provision- Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect or limit the application of, or any obligation to comply with, any environmental law, including the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 ( (j) Definitions- In this section: (1) The term ‘military training route’ means a training route developed as part of the Military Training Route Program, carried out jointly by the Federal Aviation Administration and the Secretary of Defense, for use by the Armed Forces for the purpose of conducting low-altitude, high-speed military training. (2) The term ‘military installation’ has the meaning given that term in (3) The term ‘military readiness’ includes any training or operation that could be related to combat readiness, including testing and evaluation activities. TITLE IV--MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces. Sec. 402. Revision in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels. Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve. Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the Reserves. Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status). Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2011 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians. Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support. Sec. 421. Military personnel. Subtitle A--Active Forces The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty personnel as of September 30, 2011, as follows: (1) The Army, 569,400. (2) The Navy, 328,700. (3) The Marine Corps, 202,100. (4) The Air Force, 332,200. ‘(1) For the Army, 547,400. ‘(2) For the Navy, 324,300. ‘(3) For the Marine Corps, 202,100. ‘(4) For the Air Force, 332,200.’. Subtitle B--Reserve Forces (a) In General- The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2011, as follows: (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 358,200. (2) The Army Reserve, 205,000. (3) The Navy Reserve, 65,500. (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 39,600. (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 106,700. (6) The Air Force Reserve, 71,200. (7) The Coast Guard Reserve, 10,000. (b) End Strength Reductions- The end strengths prescribed by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component shall be proportionately reduced by-- (2) the total number of individual members not in units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component who are on active duty (other than for training or for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their consent at the end of the fiscal year. (c) End Strength Increases- Whenever units or individual members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual members. Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of September 30, 2011, the following number of Reserves to be serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components: (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 32,060. (2) The Army Reserve, 16,261. (3) The Navy Reserve, 10,688. (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 2,261. (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 14,584. (6) The Air Force Reserve, 2,992. The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) as of the last day of fiscal year 2011 for the reserve components of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding (1) For the Army Reserve, 8,395. (2) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 27,210. (3) For the Air Force Reserve, 10,720. (4) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 22,394. (a) Limitations- (1) NATIONAL GUARD- Within the limitation provided in (A) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 1,600. (B) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 350. (2) ARMY RESERVE- The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Army Reserve as of September 30, 2011, may not exceed 595. (3) AIR FORCE RESERVE- The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Air Force Reserve as of September 30, 2011, may not exceed 90. (b) Non-dual Status Technicians Defined- In this section, the term ‘non-dual status technician’ has the meaning given that term in During fiscal year 2011, the maximum number of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving at any time on full-time operational support duty under (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 17,000. (2) The Army Reserve, 13,000. (3) The Navy Reserve, 6,200. (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000. (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 16,000. (6) The Air Force Reserve, 14,000. Subtitle C--Authorization of Appropriations (a) Authorization of Appropriations- There is hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for military personnel for fiscal year 2011 a total of $138,540,700,000. (b) Construction of Authorization- The authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other authorization of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for such purpose for fiscal year 2011. TITLE V--MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY Sec. 501. Ages for appointment and mandatory retirement for health professions officers. Sec. 502. Authority for appointment of warrant officers in the grade of W-1 by commission and standardization of warrant officer appointing authority. Sec. 503. Nondisclosure of information from discussions, deliberations, notes, and records of special selection boards. Sec. 504. Administrative removal of officers from promotion list. Sec. 505. Modification of authority for officers selected for appointment to general and flag officer grades to wear insignia of higher grade before appointment. Sec. 511. Removal of statutory distribution limits on Navy reserve flag officer allocation. Sec. 512. Assignment of Air Force Reserve military technicians (dual status) to positions outside Air Force Reserve unit program. Sec. 513. Temporary authority for temporary employment of non-dual status military technicians. Sec. 514. Revision of structure and functions of the Reserve Forces Policy Board. Sec. 515. Repeal of requirement for new oath when officer transfers from active-duty list to reserve active-status list. Sec. 516. Leave of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces. Sec. 517. Direct appointment of graduates of the United States Merchant Marine Academy into the National Guard. Sec. 521. Technical revisions to definition of joint matters for purposes of joint officer management. Sec. 522. Modification of promotion board procedures for joint qualified officers and officers with Joint Staff experience. Sec. 531. Extension of temporary authority to order retired members of the Armed Forces to active duty in high-demand, low-density assignments. Sec. 532. Non-chargeable rest and recuperation absence for certain members undergoing extended deployment to a combat zone. Sec. 533. Correction of military records. Sec. 534. Disposition of members found to be fit for duty who are not suitable for deployment or worldwide assignment for medical reasons. Sec. 535. Review of laws, policies, and regulations restricting service of female members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 541. Continuation of warrant officers on active duty to complete disciplinary action. Sec. 542. Enhanced authority to punish contempt in military justice proceedings. Sec. 543. Improvements to Department of Defense domestic violence programs. Sec. 551. Enhancements of Department of Defense undergraduate nurse training program. Sec. 552. Repayment of education loan repayment benefits. Sec. 553. Participation of Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship and Financial Assistance Program recipients in active duty health profession loan repayment program. Sec. 561. Enrollment of dependents of members of the Armed Forces who reside in temporary housing in Department of Defense domestic dependent elementary and secondary schools. Sec. 562. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees. Sec. 563. Impact aid for children with severe disabilities. Sec. 571. Clarification of persons eligible for award of bronze star medal. Sec. 572. Authorization and request for award of Distinguished-Service Cross to Shinyei Matayoshi for acts of valor during World War II. Sec. 573. Authorization and request for award of Distinguished-Service Cross to Jay C. Copley for acts of valor during the Vietnam War. Sec. 574. Program to commemorate 60th anniversary of the Korean War. Sec. 581. Appointment of additional members of Department of Defense Military Family Readiness Council. Sec. 582. Enhancement of community support for military families with special needs. Sec. 583. Modification of Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program. Sec. 584. Expansion and continuation of Joint Family Support Assistance Program. Sec. 585. Report on military spouse education programs. Sec. 586. Report on enhancing benefits available for military dependent children with special education needs. Sec. 587. Reports on child development centers and financial assistance for child care for members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 591. Authority for members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense and Coast Guard civilian employees and their families to accept gifts from non-Federal entities. Sec. 592. Increase in number of private sector civilians authorized for admission to National Defense University. Sec. 593. Admission of defense industry civilians to attend United States Air Force Institute of Technology. Sec. 594. Updated terminology for Army Medical Service Corps. Sec. 595. Date for submission of annual report on Department of Defense STARBASE Program. Sec. 596. Extension of deadline for submission of final report of Military Leadership Diversity Commission. Subtitle A--Officer Personnel Policy Generally (a) Age for Original Appointment as Health Professions Officer- (b) Mandatory Retirement Age for Health Professions Officers- (1) ADDITIONAL CATEGORIES OF OFFICERS ELIGIBLE FOR DEFERRAL OF MANDATORY RETIREMENT FOR AGE- Paragraph (2) of section 1251(b) of such title is amended-- (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘or’ at the end; (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end and inserting ‘; or’; and (C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: ‘(D) an officer in a category of officers designated by the Secretary of the military department concerned for the purposes of this paragraph as consisting of officers whose duties consist primarily of-- ‘(i) providing health care; ‘(ii) performing other clinical care; or ‘(iii) performing health care-related administrative duties.’. (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT- Paragraph (1) of such section is amended by striking ‘the officer will be performing duties consisting primarily of providing patient care or performing other clinical duties.’ and inserting ‘the officer-- ‘(A) will be performing duties consisting primarily of providing patient care or performing other clinical duties; or ‘(B) is in a category of officers designated under subparagraph (D) of paragraph (2) whose duties will consist primarily of the duties described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of such subparagraph.’. (a) Regular Officers- (1) AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENTS BY COMMISSION IN WARRANT OFFICER W-1 GRADE- The first sentence of (2) APPOINTING AUTHORITY- The second sentence of such section is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: ‘, and appointments (whether by warrant or commission) in the grade of regular warrant officer, W-1, shall be made by the President, except that appointments in that grade in the Coast Guard shall be made by the Secretary concerned’. (b) Reserve Officers- Subsection (b) of section 12241 of such title is amended to read as follows: ‘(b) Appointments in permanent reserve warrant officer grades shall be made in the same manner as is prescribed for regular warrant officer grades by section 571(b) of this title.’. (c) Presidential Functions- Except as otherwise provided by the President by Executive order, the provisions of Executive Order 13384 ( (a) Nondisclosure of Board Proceedings- (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following new subsection: ‘(a) Prohibition on Disclosure- The proceedings of a selection board convened under section 573, 611, or 628 of this title may not be disclosed to any person not a member of the board, except as authorized or required to process the report of the board. This prohibition is a statutory exemption from disclosure, as described in section 552(b)(3) of title 5.’; (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘and Records’ and inserting ‘Notes, and Records’; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: ‘(c) Applicability- This section applies to all selection boards convened under section 573, 611, or 628 of this title, regardless of the date on which the board was convened.’. (b) Reports of Boards- Section 628(c)(2) of such title is amended by striking ‘sections 576(d) and 576(f)’ and inserting ‘sections 576(d), 576(f), and 613a’. (c) Reserve Boards- Section 14104 of such title is amended-- (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following new subsection: ‘(a) Prohibition on Disclosure- The proceedings of a selection board convened under section 14101 or 14502 of this title may not be disclosed to any person not a member of the board, except as authorized or required to process the report of the board. This prohibition is a statutory exemption from disclosure, as described in section 552(b)(3) of title 5.’; (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘and Records’ and inserting ‘Notes, and Records’; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: ‘(c) Applicability- This section applies to all selection boards convened under section 14101 or 14502 of this title, regardless of the date on which the board was convened.’. (a) Active-duty List- (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d): ‘(d) Administrative Removal- Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned, if an officer on the active-duty list is discharged or dropped from the rolls or transferred to a retired status after having been recommended for promotion to a higher grade under this chapter, but before being promoted, the officer’s name shall be administratively removed from the list of officers recommended for promotion by a selection board.’. (b) Reserve Active-status List- Section 14310 of such title is amended-- (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d): ‘(d) Administrative Removal- Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned, if an officer on the reserve active-status list is discharged or dropped from the rolls or transferred to a retired status after having been recommended for promotion to a higher grade under this chapter or having been found qualified for Federal recognition in the higher grade under title 32, but before being promoted, the officer’s name shall be administratively removed from the list of officers recommended for promotion by a selection board.’. (a) Limited Authority for Officers Selected for Appointment to Grades Above Major General and Rear Admiral- (1) IN GENERAL- Chapter 45 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: ‘(a) Authority- An officer serving in a grade below the grade of lieutenant general or, in the case of the Navy, vice admiral, who has been selected for appointment to the grade of lieutenant general or general, or, in the case of the Navy, vice admiral or admiral, and an officer serving in the grade of lieutenant general or vice admiral who has been selected for appointment to the grade of general or admiral, may be authorized, under regulations and policies of the Department of Defense and subject to subsection (b), to wear the insignia for that higher grade for a period of up to 14 days before assuming the duties of a position for which the higher grade is authorized. An officer who is so authorized to wear the insignia of a higher grade is said to be ‘frocked’ to that grade. ‘(b) Restrictions- An officer may not be authorized to wear the insignia for a grade as described in subsection (a) unless-- ‘(1) the Senate has given its advice and consent to the appointment of the officer to that grade; ‘(2) the officer has received orders to serve in a position outside the military department of that officer for which that grade is authorized; ‘(3) the Secretary of Defense (or a civilian officer within the Office of the Secretary of Defense whose appointment was made with the advice and consent of the Senate and to whom the Secretary delegates such approval authority) has given approval for the officer to wear the insignia for that grade before assuming the duties of a position for which that grade is authorized; and ‘(4) the Secretary of Defense has submitted to Congress a written notification of the intent to authorize the officer to wear the insignia for that grade. ‘(c) Benefits Not to Be Construed as Accruing- (1) Authority provided to an officer as described in subsection (a) to wear the insignia of a higher grade may not be construed as conferring authority for that officer to-- ‘(A) be paid the rate of pay provided for an officer in that grade having the same number of years of service as that officer; or ‘(B) assume any legal authority associated with that grade. ‘(2) The period for which an officer wears the insignia of a higher grade under such authority may not be taken into account for any of the following purposes: ‘(A) Seniority in that grade. ‘(B) Time of service in that grade. ‘(d) Limitation on Number of Officers Frocked- The total number of officers who are authorized to wear the insignia for a higher grade under this section shall count against the limitation in section 777(d) of this title on the total number of officers authorized to wear the insignia of a higher grade.’. (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT- The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: ‘777a. Wearing of insignia of higher grade before appointment to a grade above major general or rear admiral (frocking): authority; restrictions.’. (b) Repeal of Waiting Period Following Congressional Notification for Officers Selected for Appointment to General and Flag Officer Grades Below Lieutenant General and Vice Admiral- Section 777(b)(3)(B) of such title is amended by striking ‘and a period of 30 days has elapsed after the date of the notification’. (a) Army- (b) Navy and Marine Corps- Section 6323(a)(2)(B) of such title is amended by striking ‘January 6, 2006, and ending on December 31, 2008’ and inserting ‘the date of the enactment of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 and ending on September 30, 2013’. (c) Air Force- Section 8911(b)(2) of such title is amended by striking ‘January 6, 2006, and ending on December 31, 2008’ and inserting ‘the date of the enactment of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 and ending on September 30, 2013’. Subtitle B--Reserve Component Management (1) by striking paragraphs (2), (3), and (5); and (2) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (2). ‘(3) Paragraph (1) does not apply to a military technician (dual status) who is employed by the Air Force Reserve in an area other than the Air Force Reserve unit program, except that not more than 50 of such technicians may be assigned outside of the unit program at the same time.’. (a) Exception for Temporary Employment- (1) in subsection (a)-- (A) by striking ‘or’ at the end of paragraph (1); (B) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (2) and inserting ‘; or’; and (C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(3) is hired as a temporary employee pursuant to the exception for temporary employment provided by subsection (d) and subject to the terms and conditions of such subsection.’; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: ‘(d) Exception for Temporary Employment- (1) Notwithstanding section 10218 of this title, the Secretary of the Army or the Secretary of the Air Force may employ, for a period not to exceed two years, a person to fill a vacancy created by the mobilization of a military technician (dual status) occupying a position under section 10216 of this title. ‘(2) The duration of the temporary employment of a person in a military technician position under this subsection may not exceed the shorter of the following: ‘(A) The period of mobilization of the military technician (dual status) whose vacancy is being filled by the temporary employee. ‘(B) Two years. ‘(3) No person may be hired under the authority of this subsection after the end of the 2-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this subsection.’. (b) Exception From Permanent Limitation on Number of Non-dual Status Technicians- Subsection (c) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(3) An individual employed as a non-dual status technician as described in subsection (a)(3) shall not be consider a non-dual status technician for purposes of paragraphs (1) and (2).’. (a) Revision of Structure- (1) IN GENERAL- ‘(a) In General- As provided in section 175 of this title, there is in the Office of the Secretary of Defense a board known as the ‘Reserve Forces Policy Board’ (in this section referred to as the ‘Board’). ‘(b) Functions- The Board shall serve as an independent adviser to the Secretary of Defense to provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary on strategies, policies, and practices designed to improve and enhance the capabilities, efficiency, and effectiveness of the reserve components. ‘(c) Membership- The Board consists of 20 members, appointed or designated as follows: ‘(1) A civilian appointed by the Secretary of Defense from among persons determined by the Secretary to have the knowledge of, and experience in, policy matters relevant to national security and reserve component matters necessary to carry out the duties of chair of the Board, who shall serve as chair of the Board. ‘(2) Two active or retired reserve officers or enlisted members designated by the Secretary of Defense upon the recommendation of the Secretary of the Army-- ‘(A) one of whom shall be a member of the Army National Guard of the United States or a former member of the Army National Guard of the United States in the Retired Reserve; and ‘(B) one of whom shall be a member or retired member of the Army Reserve. ‘(3) Two active or retired reserve officers or enlisted members designated by the Secretary of Defense upon the recommendation of the Secretary of the Navy-- ‘(A) one of whom shall be an active or retired officer of the Navy Reserve; and ‘(B) one of whom shall be an active or retired officer of the Marine Corps Reserve. ‘(4) Two active or retired reserve officers or enlisted members designated by the Secretary of Defense upon the recommendation of the Secretary of the Air Force-- ‘(A) one of whom shall be a member of the Air National Guard of the United States or a former member of the Air National Guard of the United States in the Retired Reserve; and ‘(B) one of whom shall be a member or retired member of the Air Force Reserve. ‘(5) One active or retired reserve officer or enlisted member of the Coast Guard designated by the Secretary of Homeland Security. ‘(6) Ten persons appointed or designated by the Secretary of Defense, each of whom shall be a United States citizen having significant knowledge of and experience in policy matters relevant to national security and reserve component matters and shall be one of the following: ‘(A) An individual not employed in any Federal or State department or agency. ‘(B) An individual employed by a Federal or State department or agency. ‘(C) An officer of a regular component of the armed forces on active duty, or an officer of a reserve component of the armed forces in an active status, who-- ‘(i) is serving or has served in a senior position on the Joint Staff, the headquarters staff of a combatant command, or the headquarters staff of an armed force; and ‘(ii) has experience in joint professional military education, joint qualification, and joint operations matters. ‘(7) A reserve officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps who is a general or flag officer recommended by the chair and designated by the Secretary of Defense, who shall serve without vote-- ‘(A) as military adviser to the chair; ‘(B) as military executive officer of the Board; and ‘(C) as supervisor of the operations and staff of the Board. ‘(8) A senior enlisted member of a reserve component recommended by the chair and designated by the Secretary of Defense, who shall serve without vote as enlisted military adviser to the chair. ‘(d) Matters To Be Acted on- The Board may act on those matters referred to it by the chair and on any matter raised by a member of the Board or the Secretary of Defense. ‘(e) Staff- The Board shall be supported by a staff consisting of one full-time officer from each of the reserve components listed in paragraphs (1) through (6) of section 10101 of this title who holds the grade of colonel (or in the case of the Navy, the grade of captain) or who has been selected for promotion to that grade. These officers shall also serve as liaisons between their respective components and the Board. They shall perform their staff and liaison duties under the supervision of the military executive officer of the Board in an independent manner reflecting the independent nature of the Board. ‘(f) Relationship to Service Reserve Policy Committees and Boards- This section does not affect the committees and boards prescribed within the military departments by sections 10302 through 10305 of this title, and a member of such a committee or board may, if otherwise eligible, be a member of the Board.’. (2) EFFECTIVE DATE- The amendment made by paragraph (1) shall take effect on July 1, 2011. (b) Revision to Annual Report Requirement- (a) Carryover of Accumulated Leave to Succeeding Period of Active Service- ‘(k) A member of a reserve component who accumulates leave during a period of active service may carry over any leave so accumulated to the member’s next period of active service, subject to the accumulation limits in subsections (b), (d), and (f), without regard to separation or release from active service if the separation or release is under honorable conditions. The taking of leave carried over under this subsection shall be subject to the provisions of this section.’. (b) Payment for Unused Accrued Leave- (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘and’ at the end; (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: ‘(4) in the case of an officer or an enlisted member of a reserve component who is not serving on active duty, separation or release from the reserve component under honorable conditions, or death; and ‘(5) in the case of an enlisted member of a reserve a component who is not serving on active duty, termination of enlistment in conjunction with the commencement of a successive enlistment, or appointment as an officer.’. Subtitle C--Joint Qualified Officers and Requirements (1) in paragraph (1)-- (A) by striking ‘multiple’ in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) and inserting ‘integrated’; and (B) by striking ‘and’ at the end of the subparagraph (D) and inserting ‘or’; and (2) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraph: ‘(2) In the context of joint matters, the term ‘integrated military forces’ refers to military forces that are involved in the planning or execution (or both) of operations involving participants from-- ‘(A) more than one military department; or ‘(B) a military department and one or more of the following: ‘(i) Other departments and agencies of the United States. ‘(ii) The military forces or agencies of other countries. ‘(iii) Non-governmental persons or entities.’. (a) Board Composition- Subsection (c) of ‘(c)(1) Each selection board convened under section 611(a) of this title that will consider an officer described in paragraph (2) shall include at least one officer designated by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff who is a joint qualified officer. ‘(2) Paragraph (1) applies with respect to an officer who-- ‘(A) is serving on, or has served on, the Joint Staff; or ‘(B) is a joint qualified officer. ‘(3) The Secretary of Defense may waive the requirement in paragraph (1) in the case of-- ‘(A) any selection board of the Marine Corps; or ‘(B) any selection board that is considering officers in specialties identified in paragraph (2) or (3) of section 619a(b) of this title.’. (b) Information Furnished to Selection Boards- Section 615 of such title is amended in subsections (b)(5) and (c) by striking ‘in joint duty assignments of officers who are serving, or have served, in such assignments’ and inserting ‘of officers who are serving on, or have served on, the Joint Staff or are joint qualified officers’. (c) Action on Report of Selection Boards- Section 618(b) of such title is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘are serving, or have served, in joint duty assignments’ and inserting ‘are serving on, or have served on, the Joint Staff or are joint qualified officers’; (2) in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (2), by striking ‘in joint duty assignments of officers who are serving, or have served, in such assignments’ and inserting ‘of officers who are serving on, or have served on, the Joint Staff or are joint qualified officers’; and (3) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘in joint duty assignments’ and inserting ‘who are serving on, or have served on, the Joint Staff or are joint qualified officers’. Subtitle D--General Service Authorities (a) Extension of Authority- (b) Report Required- Not later than April 1, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing an assessment by the Secretary of the need to extend the authority provided by (1) A list of the current types of high-demand, low-density capabilities (as defined in such section) for which the authority is being used to address operational requirements. (2) For each high-demand, low-density capability included in the list under paragraph (1), the number of retired members of the Armed Forces who have served on active duty at any time during each of fiscal years 2007 through 2010 under the authority. (3) A plan to increase the required active duty strength for the high-demand, low-density capabilities included in the list under paragraph (1) to eliminate the need to use the authority. (a) In General- Chapter 40 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 705 the following new section: ‘(a) Rest and Recuperation Authorized- Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary concerned may provide a member of the armed forces described in subsection (b) the benefits described in subsection (c). ‘(b) Covered Members- A member of the armed forces described in this subsection is any member who-- ‘(1) is assigned or deployed for at least 270 days in an area or location-- ‘(A) that is designated by the President as a combat zone; and ‘(B) in which hardship duty pay is authorized to be paid under section 305 of title 37; and ‘(2) meets such other criteria as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe in the regulations required by subsection (a). ‘(c) Benefits- The benefits described in this subsection are the following: ‘(1) A period of rest and recuperation absence for not more than 15 days. ‘(2) Round-trip transportation at Government expense from the area or location in which the member is serving in connection with the exercise of the period of rest and recuperation. ‘(d) Construction With Other Leave- Any benefits provided a member under this section are in addition to any other leave or absence to which the member may be entitled.’. (b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 705 the following new item: ‘705a. Rest and recuperation absence: certain members undergoing extended deployment to a combat zone.’. (a) Members Eligible to Request Review of Retirement or Separation Without Pay for Physical Disability- (1) by striking ‘an officer’ and inserting ‘a member or former member of the uniformed services’; and (2) by striking ‘his case’ and inserting ‘the member’s case’. (b) Limitation on Reduction in Personnel Assigned to Duty With Service Review Agency- 1559(a) of such title is amended by striking ‘December 31, 2010’ and inserting ‘December 31, 2013’. (a) Disposition- (1) IN GENERAL- Chapter 61 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1214 the following new section: ‘(a) Disposition- Except as provided in subsection (c), the Secretary of the military department concerned may not authorize the involuntary administrative separation of a member described in subsection (b) based on a determination that the member is unsuitable for deployment or worldwide assignment based on the same medical condition of the member considered by a Physical Evaluation Board during the evaluation of the member. ‘(b) Covered Members- A member covered by subsection (a) is any member of the armed forces who has been determined by a Physical Evaluation Board pursuant to a physical evaluation by the board to be fit for duty. ‘(c) Reevaluation- (1) The Secretary of the military department concerned may direct the Physical Evaluation Board to reevaluate any member described in subsection (b) if the Secretary has reason to believe that a medical condition of the member considered by the Physical Evaluation Board during the evaluation of the member described in that subsection renders the member unsuitable for continued military service based on the medical condition. ‘(2) A member determined pursuant to reevaluation under paragraph (1) to be unfit to perform the duties of the member’s office, grade, rank, or rating may be retired or separated for physical disability under this chapter. ‘(3) The Secretary of Defense shall be the final approval authority for any case determined by the Secretary of a military department to warrant administrative separation based on a determination that the member is unsuitable for continued service due to the same medical condition of the member considered by a Physical Evaluation Board that found the member fit for duty.’. (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 61 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1214 the following new item: ‘1214a. Members determined fit for duty in Physical Evaluation Board evaluation: prohibition on involuntary administrative separation due to unsuitability based on medical conditions considered in evaluation.’. (b) Effective Date- The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to members evaluated for fitness for duty by Physical Evaluation Boards on or after that date. (a) Review Required- The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall conduct a review of laws, policies, and regulations, including the collocation policy, that may restrict the service of female members of the Armed Forces to determine whether changes in such laws, policies, and regulations are needed to ensure that female members have an equitable opportunity to compete and excel in the Armed Forces. (b) Submission of Results- Not later than April 15, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of the review. Subtitle E--Military Justice and Legal Matters ‘(f) A warrant officer subject to discharge or retirement under this section, but against whom any action has been commenced with a view to trying the officer by court-martial, may be continued on active duty, without prejudice to such action, until the completion of such action.’. (a) In General- ‘(a) Authority to Punish Contempt- A judge detailed to a court-martial, a court of inquiry, the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, a military Court of Criminal Appeals, a provost court, or a military commission may punish for contempt any person who-- ‘(1) uses any menacing word, sign, or gesture in the presence of the judge during the proceedings of the court-martial, court, or military commission; ‘(2) disturbs the proceedings of the court-martial, court, or military commission by any riot or disorder; or ‘(3) willfully disobeys the lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command of the court-martial, court, or military commission. ‘(b) Punishment- The punishment for contempt under subsection (a) may not exceed confinement for 30 days, a fine of $1,000, or both. ‘(c) Inapplicability to Military Commissions Under Chapter 47A- This section does not apply to a military commission established under chapter 47A of this title.’. (b) Effective Date- (a) Implementation of Outstanding Comptroller General Recommendations- Consistent with the recommendations contained in the report of the Comptroller General of the United States titled ‘Status of Implementation of GAO’s 2006 Recommendations on the Department of Defense’s Domestic Violence Program’ (GAO-10-577R), the Secretary of Defense shall complete, not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, implementation of actions to address the following recommendations: (1) DEFENSE INCIDENT-BASED REPORTING SYSTEM- The Secretary of Defense shall develop a comprehensive management plan to address deficiencies in the data captured in the Defense Incident-Based Reporting System to ensure the system can provide an accurate count of domestic violence incidents, and any consequent disciplinary action, that are reported throughout the Department of Defense. (2) ADEQUATE PERSONNEL- The Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan to ensure that adequate personnel are available to implement recommendations made by the Defense Task Force on Domestic Violence. (3) DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TRAINING DATA FOR CHAPLAINS- The Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan to collect domestic violence training data for chaplains. (4) OVERSIGHT FRAMEWORK- The Secretary of Defense shall develop an oversight framework for Department of Defense domestic violence programs, to include oversight of implementation of recommendations made by the Defense Task Force on Domestic Violence, including budgeting, communication initiatives, and policy compliance. (b) Implementation Report- The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an implementation report within 90 days of the completion of actions outlined in subsection (a). Subtitle F--Member Education and Training Opportunities and Administration (a) Clarification of Degree Covered by Program- Subsection (a) of (b) Graduation Rates of Training Programs- Subsection (b) of such section is amended by inserting ‘in nursing’ after ‘bachelor of science degree’. (c) Location of Programs- Subsection (d) of such section is amended to read as follows: ‘(d) Location of Programs- (1) An academic institution selected to operate an undergraduate nurse training program shall establish the program at or near a military installation that has a military treatment facility designated as a medical center with inpatient capability and multiple graduate medical education programs located on the installation or within reasonable proximity to the installation. ‘(2) Before approving a location as the site of an undergraduate nurse training program, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct an assessment to ensure that the establishment of the program at that location will not adversely impact or displace existing nurse training programs, either conducted by the Department of Defense or by a civilian entity, at the location.’. (d) Pilot Program- (1) IMPLEMENTATION- Paragraph (2) of section 525(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (2) GRADUATION RATES- Paragraph (3) of such section is amended-- (A) by striking the ‘The pilot program shall achieve’ and inserting ‘The goal of the pilot program is to achieve’; and (B) by striking ‘nurse training program’ and inserting ‘nurse training programs’. (a) Enlisted Members on Active Duty in Specified Military Specialties- ‘(g) Except a person described in subsection (e) who transfers to service making the person eligible for repayment of loans under section 16301 of this title, a member of the armed forces who fails to complete the period of service required to qualify for loan repayment under this section shall be subject to the repayment provisions of section 303a(e) of title 37. ‘(h) The Secretary of Defense may prescribe, by regulations, procedures for implementing this section, including standards for qualified loans and authorized payees and other terms and conditions for making loan repayments. Such regulations may include exceptions that would allow for the payment as a lump sum of any loan repayment due to a member under a written agreement that existed at the time of a member’s death or disability.’. (b) Members of Selected Reserve- Section 16301 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections: ‘(h) Except a person described in subsection (e) who transfers to service making the person eligible for repayment of loans under section 2171 of this title, a member of the armed forces who fails to complete the period of service required to qualify for loan repayment under this section shall be subject to the repayment provisions of section 303a(e) of title 37. ‘(i) The Secretary of Defense may prescribe, by regulations, procedures for implementing this section, including standards for qualified loans and authorized payees and other terms and conditions for making loan repayments. Such regulations may include exceptions that would allow for the payment as a lump sum of any loan repayment due to a member under a written agreement that existed at the time of a member’s death or disability.’. ‘(4) The person is enrolled in the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship and Financial Assistance Program under subchapter I of chapter 105 of this title for a number of years less than is required to complete the normal length of the course of study required for the health profession concerned.’. (a) Military Academy Graduates- ‘(4) That if an appointment described in paragraph (2) or (3) is tendered and the cadet participates in a program under section 2121 of this title, the cadet will fulfill any unserved obligation incurred under this section on active duty, regardless of the type of appointment held, upon completion of, and in addition to, any service obligation incurred under section 2123 of this title for participation in such program.’. (b) Naval Academy Graduates- Section 6959(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(4) That if an appointment described in paragraph (2) or (3) is tendered and the midshipman participates in a program under section 2121 of this title, the midshipman will fulfill any unserved obligation incurred under this section on active duty, regardless of the type of appointment held, upon completion of, and in addition to, any service obligation incurred under section 2123 of this title for participation in such program.’. (c) Air Force Academy Graduates- Section 9348(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(4) That if an appointment described in paragraph (2) or (3) is tendered and the cadet participates in a program under section 2121 of this title, the cadet will fulfill any unserved obligation incurred under this section on active duty, regardless of the type of appointment held, upon completion of, and in addition to, any service obligation incurred under section 2123 of this title for participation in such program.’. Subtitle G--Defense Dependents’ Education ‘(3)(A) Under the circumstances described in subparagraph (B), the Secretary may, at the discretion of the Secretary, permit a dependent of a member of the armed forces to enroll in an educational program provided by the Secretary pursuant to this subsection without regard to the requirement in paragraph (1) with respect to residence on a military installation. ‘(B) Subparagraph (A) applies only if-- ‘(i) the dependents reside in temporary housing (regardless of whether the temporary housing is on Federal property)-- ‘(I) because of the unavailability of adequate permanent living quarters on the military installation to which the member is assigned; or ‘(II) while the member is wounded, ill, or injured; and ‘(ii) the Secretary determines that the circumstances of such living arrangements justify extending the enrollment authority to include the dependents.’. (a) Assistance to Schools With Significant Numbers of Military Dependent Students- Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 pursuant to section 301(5) for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities, $30,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 ( (b) Assistance to Schools With Enrollment Changes Due to Base Closures, Force Structure Changes, or Force Relocations- Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 pursuant to section 301(5) for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities, $10,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (b) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 ( (c) Local Educational Agency Defined- In this section, the term ‘local educational agency’ has the meaning given that term in section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 ( Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 pursuant to section 301(5) for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities, $10,000,000 shall be available for payments under section 363 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Subtitle H--Decorations and Awards (a) Limitation on Eligible Persons- ‘The decoration known as the ‘Bronze Star’ may only be awarded to a member of a military force who-- ‘(1) at the time of the events for which the decoration is to be awarded, was serving in a geographic area in which special pay is authorized under section 310 or paragraph (1) or (3) of section 351(a) of title 37; or ‘(2) receives special pay under section 310 or paragraph (1) or (3) of section 351(a) of title 37 as a result of those events.’. (b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 57 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 1133 and inserting the following new item: ‘1133. Bronze Star: limitation on persons eligible to receive.’. (c) Application of Amendment- The amendment made by subsection (a) applies to the award of the Bronze Star after October 30, 2000. (a) Authorization- Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in (b) Acts of Valor Described- The acts of valor referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of Tech Sergeant Shinyei Matayoshi on April 7, 1945, as a member of Company G, 2d Battalion, 442d Regimental Combat Team during World War II. (a) Authorization- Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in (b) Acts of Valor Described- The acts of valor referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of then Captain Jay C. Copley on May 5, 1968, as commander of Company C of the 1st Battalion, 50th Infantry, attached to the 173d Airborne Brigade during an engagement with a regimental-size enemy force in Bin Dinh Province, South Vietnam. (a) Commemorative Program Authorized- The Secretary of Defense may establish and conduct a program to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the Korean War (in this section referred to as the ‘commemorative program’). In conducting the commemorative program, the Secretary of Defense shall coordinate and support other programs and activities of the Federal Government, State and local governments, and other persons and organizations in commemoration of the Korean War. (b) Schedule- If the Secretary of Defense establishes the commemorative program, the Secretary shall determine the schedule of major events and priority of efforts for the commemorative program to achieve the commemorative objectives specified in subsection (c). The Secretary of Defense may establish a committee to assist the Secretary in determining the schedule and conducting the commemorative program. (c) Commemorative Activities and Objectives- The commemorative program may include activities and ceremonies to achieve the following objectives: (1) To thank and honor veterans of the Korean War, including members of the Armed Forces who were held as prisoners of war or listed as missing in action, for their service and sacrifice on behalf of the United States. (2) To thank and honor the families of veterans of the Korean War for their sacrifices and contributions, especially families who lost a loved one in the Korean War. (3) To highlight the service of the Armed Forces during the Korean War and the contributions of Federal agencies and governmental and non-governmental organizations that served with, or in support of, the Armed Forces. (4) To pay tribute to the sacrifices and contributions made on the home front by the people of the United States during the Korean War. (5) To provide the people of the United States with a clear understanding and appreciation of the lessons and history of the Korean War. (6) To highlight the advances in technology, science, and medicine related to military research conducted during the Korean War. (7) To recognize the contributions and sacrifices made by the allies of the United States during the Korean War. (d) Use of The United States of America Korean War Commemoration and Symbols- Subsection (c) of section 1083 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 ( (e) Commemorative Fund- (1) ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW ACCOUNT- If the Secretary of Defense establishes the commemorative program, the Secretary the Treasury shall establish in the Treasury of the United States an account to be known as the ‘Department of Defense Korean War Commemoration Fund’ (in this section referred to as the ‘Fund’). (2) ADMINISTRATION AND USE OF FUND- The Fund shall be available to, and administered by, the Secretary of Defense. The Secretary of Defense shall use the assets of the Fund only for the purpose of conducting the commemorative program and shall prescribe such regulations regarding the use of the Fund as the Secretary of Defense considers to be necessary. (3) DEPOSITS- There shall be deposited into the Fund the following: (A) Amounts appropriated to the Fund. (B) Proceeds derived from the use by the Secretary of Defense of the exclusive rights described in subsection (c) of section 1083 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 ( (C) Donations made in support of the commemorative program by private and corporate donors. (4) AVAILABILITY- Subject to paragraph (5), amounts in the Fund shall remain available until expended. (5) TREATMENT OF UNOBLIGATED FUNDS; TRANSFER- If unobligated amounts remain in the Fund as of September 30, 2013, the Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer the remaining amounts to the Department of Defense Vietnam War Commemorative Fund established pursuant to section 598(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (f) Acceptance of Voluntary Services- (1) AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT SERVICES- Notwithstanding (2) COMPENSATION FOR WORK-RELATED INJURY- A person providing voluntary services under this subsection shall be considered to be a Federal employee for purposes of chapter 81 of title 5, United States Code, relating to compensation for work-related injuries. The person shall also be considered a special governmental employee for purposes of standards of conduct and sections 202, 203, 205, 207, 208, and 209 of title 18, United States Code. A person who is not otherwise employed by the Federal Government shall not be considered to be a Federal employee for any other purpose by reason of the provision of voluntary services under this subsection. (3) REIMBURSEMENT OF INCIDENTAL EXPENSES- The Secretary of Defense may provide for reimbursement of incidental expenses incurred by a person providing voluntary services under this subsection. The Secretary of Defense shall determine which expenses are eligible for reimbursement under this paragraph. (g) Report Required- If the Secretary of Defense conducts the commemorative program, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall submit to Congress, not later than 60 days after the end of the commemorative program, a report containing an accounting of-- (1) all of the funds deposited into and expended from the Fund; (2) any other funds expended under this section; and (3) any unobligated funds remaining in the Fund as of September 30, 2013, that are transferred to the Department of Defense Vietnam War Commemorative Fund pursuant to subsection (e)(5). (h) Limitation on Expenditures- Using amounts appropriated to the Department of Defense, the Secretary of Defense may not expend more than $5,000,000 to carry out the commemorative program. Subtitle I--Military Family Readiness Matters (a) Inclusion of Spouse of General or Flag Officer- Subsection (b) of (1) in paragraph (1)-- (A) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (F); and (B) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following new subparagraph: ‘(E) The spouse of a general or flag officer.’; and (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘subparagraphs (C) and (D)’ and inserting ‘subparagraphs (C), (D), and (E)’. (b) Inclusion of Director of Office of Community Support for Military Families With Special Needs- Subsection (b)(1) of such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: ‘(G) The Director of the Office of Community Support for Military Families With Special Needs.’. (c) Clarification of Appointment Options for Existing Member- Subparagraph (F) of subsection (b)(1) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (a)(1)(A), is amended to read as follows: ‘(F) In addition to the representatives appointed under subparagraphs (B) and (C), the senior enlisted advisor, or the spouse of a senior enlisted member, from each of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force.’. (d) Appointment by Secretary of Defense- Subsection (b) of such section is further amended-- (1) in paragraph (1)-- (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘, who shall be appointed by the Secretary of Defense’; (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘, who shall be appointed by the Secretary of Defense’ both places it appears; and (C) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘by the Secretary of Defense’; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(3) The Secretary of Defense shall appoint the members of the Council required by subparagraphs (B) through (F) of paragraph (1).’. (a) Director of the Office of Community Support for Military Families With Special Needs- Subsection (c) of ‘(c) Director- (1) The head of the Office shall be the Director of the Office of Community Support for Military Families With Special Needs, who shall be a member of the Senior Executive Service or a general officer or flag officer. ‘(2) In the discharge of the responsibilities of the Office, the Director shall be subject to the supervision, direction, and control of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness.’. (b) Additional Responsibility for Office- Subsection (d) of such section is amended-- (1) by redesignating paragraph (7) as paragraph (8); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following new paragraph (7): ‘(7) To conduct periodic reviews of best practices in the United States in the provision of medical and educational services for children with special needs.’. (c) Enhancement of Support- Section 563 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (e); and (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsections: ‘(c) Military Department Support for Local Centers to Assist Military Children With Special Needs- The Secretary of a military department may establish or support centers on or in the vicinity of military installations under the jurisdiction of such Secretary to coordinate and provide medical and educational services for children with special needs of members of the Armed Forces who are assigned to such installations. ‘(d) Advisory Panel on Community Support for Military Families With Special Needs- ‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this subsection, the Secretary of Defense shall establish an advisory panel on community support for military families with special needs. ‘(2) MEMBERS- The advisory panel shall consist of seven individuals who are a member of a military family with special needs. The Secretary of Defense shall appoint the members of the advisory panel. ‘(3) DUTIES- The advisory panel shall-- ‘(A) provide informed advice to the Director of the Office of Community Support for Military Families With Special Needs on the implementation of the policy required by subsection (e) of ‘(B) assess and provide information to the Director on services and support for children with special needs that is available from other departments and agencies of the Federal Government and from State and local governments; and ‘(C) otherwise advise and assist the Director in the discharge of the duties of the Office of Community Support for Military Families With Special Needs in such manner as the Secretary of Defense and the Director jointly determine appropriate. ‘(4) MEETINGS- The Director shall meet with the advisory panel at such times, and with such frequency, as the Director considers appropriate. The Director shall meet with the panel at least once each year. The Director may meet with the panel through teleconferencing or by other electronic means.’. (a) Office for Reintegration Programs- Subsection (d)(1) of section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (1) by striking ‘The Under’ and inserting the following: ‘(A) IN GENERAL- The Under’; and (2) in the last sentence-- (A) by striking ‘The office may also’ and inserting the following: ‘(B) PARTNERSHIPS AND ACCESS- The office may’; (B) by inserting ‘and the Department of Veterans Affairs’ after ‘Administration’; and (C) by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘Service and State-based programs may provide access to curriculum, training, and support for services to members and families from all components.’. (b) Center for Excellence in Reintegration- Subsection (d)(2) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘The Center shall develop and implement a process for evaluating the effectiveness of the Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program in supporting the health and well-being of members of the Armed Forces and their families throughout the deployment cycle described in subsection (g).’. (c) State Deployment Cycle Support Teams- Subsection (f)(3) of such section is amended by inserting ‘and community-based organizations’ after ‘service providers’. (d) Operation of Program During Deployment and Post-deployment-reconstitution Phases- Subsection (g) of such section is amended-- (1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘and to decrease the isolation of families during deployment’ after ‘combat zone’; and (2) in paragraph (5)(A), by inserting ‘, providing information on employment opportunities,’ after ‘communities’. (e) Additional Outreach Service- Subsection (h) of such section, as amended by section 595(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( ‘(15) Resiliency training to promote comprehensive programs for members of the Armed Forces to build mental and emotional resiliency for successfully meeting the demands of the deployment cycle.’. Section 675 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 ( (1) in subsection (b)-- (A) by striking ‘not more than’ and inserting ‘not less than’; and (B) by striking ‘Up to’ and inserting ‘At least’; and (2) in subsection (h), by striking ‘at the end of the three-year period beginning on the date on which funds are first obligated for the program’ and inserting ‘on December 31, 2012’. (b) Elements of Review- At a minimum, the review shall evaluate the following: (1) All education programs of the Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs that are in place to advance educational opportunities for military spouses. (2) The efficacy and effectiveness of such education programs. (3) The extent to which the availability of educational opportunities for military spouses influences the decisions of members to remain in the Armed Forces. (4) A comparison of the costs associated with providing military spouse education opportunities as an incentive to retain members rather than recruiting or training new members. (c) Submission of Results- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing-- (1) the results of the review; and (d) Consultation- In conducting the review and preparing the report, the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs regarding education programs of Department of Veterans Affairs assisting spouses of members of the Armed Forces. (b) Consultation- The Secretary of Defense shall prepare the report in consultation with the Secretary of Education. (c) Elements- In preparing the report, the Secretary of Defense shall-- (1) identify and assess obstacles faced by military families with children with special education needs in obtaining a free appropriate public education to address such needs; (2) identify and assess evidence-based research and best practices for providing special education and related services (as those terms are defined in section 602 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ( (3) assess timeliness in obtaining special education and related services described in paragraph (2); (4) determine and document the cost associated with obtaining special education and related services described in paragraph (2); (5) assess the feasibility of establishing an individualized education program for military children with special education needs that is applicable across jurisdictions of local educational agencies in order to achieve reciprocity among States in acknowledging such programs; (6) identify means of improving oversight and compliance with the requirements of section 614 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ( (7) assess the feasibility of establishing an expedited process for resolution of complaints by military parents with a child with special education needs about lack of access to education and related services otherwise specified in the individualized education program of the child; (8) assess the feasibility of permitting the Department of Defense to contact the State to which a military family with a child with special education needs will relocate pursuant to a permanent change of station when the orders for such change of station are issued, but before the family takes residence in such State, for the purpose of commencing preparation for education and related services specified in the individualized education program of the child; (9) assess the feasibility of establishing a system within the Department of Defense to document complaints by military parents regarding access to free and appropriate public education for their children with special education needs; (10) identify means to strengthen the monitoring and oversight of special education and related services for military children with special education needs under the Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunities for Military Children; and (11) consider such other matters as the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Education jointly consider appropriate. (b) Elements- Each report required by subsection (a) shall include the following, current as of the date of such report: (1) The number of child development centers currently located on military installations. (2) The number of dependents of members of the Armed Forces utilizing such child development centers. (3) The number of dependents of members of the Armed Forces that are unable to utilize such child development centers due to capacity limitations. (5) The extent to which members of the Armed Forces are utilizing such financial assistance for child care off-installation. (6) The methods by which the Department of Defense reaches out to eligible military families to increase awareness of the availability of such financial assistance. (7) The formulas used to calculate the amount of such financial assistance provided to members of the Armed Forces. (8) The funding available for such financial assistance in the Department of Defense and in the military departments. (9) The barriers to access, if any, to such financial assistance faced by members of the Armed Forces, including whether standards and criteria of the Department of Defense for child care off-installation may affect access to child care. (10) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate in connection with such report, including with respect to the enhancement of access to Department of Defense child care development centers and financial assistance for child care off-installation for members of the Armed Forces. Subtitle J--Other Matters (a) Codification and Expansion of Existing Authority to Cover Additional Members and Employees- Chapter 155 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2601 the following new section: ‘(a) Regulations Governing Acceptance of Gifts- (1) The Secretary of Defense (and the Secretary of Homeland Security in the case of the Coast Guard) shall issue regulations to provide that, subject to such limitations as may be specified in such regulations, the following individuals may accept gifts from nonprofit organizations, private parties, and other sources outside the Department of Defense or the Department of Homeland Security: ‘(A) A member of the armed forces described in subsection (b). ‘(B) A civilian employee of the Department of Defense or Coast Guard described in subsection (c). ‘(C) The family members of such a member or employee. ‘(D) Survivors of such a member or employee who is killed. ‘(2) The regulations required by this subsection shall-- ‘(A) apply uniformly to all elements of the Department of Defense and, to the maximum extent feasible, to the Coast Guard; and ‘(B) require review and approval by a designated agency ethics official before acceptance of a gift to ensure that acceptance of the gift complies with the Joint Ethics Regulation. ‘(b) Covered Members- This section applies to a member of the armed forces who, while performing active duty, full-time National Guard duty, or inactive-duty training on or after September 11, 2001, incurred an injury or illness-- ‘(1) as described in section 1413a(e)(2) of this title; or ‘(2) under other circumstances determined by the Secretary concerned to warrant treatment analogous to members covered by paragraph (1). ‘(c) Covered Employees- This section applies to a civilian employee of the Department of Defense or Coast Guard who, while an employee on or after September 11, 2001, incurred an injury or illness under a circumstance described in paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (c). ‘(d) Gifts From Certain Sources Prohibited- The regulations issued under subsection (a) may not authorize the acceptance of a gift from a foreign government or international organization or their agents.’. (b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2601 the following new item: ‘2601a. Direct acceptance of gifts by members of the armed forces and Department of Defense and Coast Guard employees and their families.’. (a) Admission Authority- Chapter 901 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 9314 the following new section: ‘(2) No more than 125 defense industry employees may be enrolled at the United States Air Force Institute of Technology at any one time under the authority of paragraph (1). ‘(3) Upon successful completion of the course of instruction at the United States Air Force Institute of Technology in which a defense industry employee is enrolled, the defense industry employee may be awarded an appropriate degree under section 9314 of this title. ‘(b) Eligible Defense Industry Employees- For purposes of this section, an eligible defense industry employee is an individual employed by a private firm that is engaged in providing to the Department of Defense significant and substantial defense-related systems, products, or services. A defense industry employee admitted for instruction at the United States Air Force Institute of Technology remains eligible for such instruction only so long at that person remains employed by the same firm. ‘(c) Annual Determination by the Secretary of the Air Force- Defense industry employees may receive instruction at the United States Air Force Institute of Technology during any academic year only if, before the start of that academic year, the Secretary of the Air Force, or the designee of the Secretary, determines that providing instruction to defense industry employees under this section during that year-- ‘(1) will further the military mission of the United States Air Force Institute of Technology; and ‘(2) will be done on a space-available basis and not require an increase in the size of the faculty of the school, an increase in the course offerings of the school, or an increase in the laboratory facilities or other infrastructure of the school. ‘(d) Program Requirements- The Secretary of the Air Force shall ensure that-- ‘(1) the curriculum in which defense industry employees may be enrolled under this section is not readily available through other schools and concentrates on the areas of focus specified in subsection (a)(1) that are conducted by military organizations and defense contractors working in close cooperation; and ‘(2) the course offerings at the United States Air Force Institute of Technology continue to be determined solely by the needs of the Department of Defense. ‘(e) Tuition- (1) The United States Air Force Institute of Technology shall charge tuition for students enrolled under this section at a rate not less than the rate charged for employees of the United States outside the Department of the Air Force. ‘(2) Amounts received by the United States Air Force Institute of Technology for instruction of students enrolled under this section shall be retained by the school to defray the costs of such instruction. The source, and the disposition, of such funds shall be specifically identified in records of the school. ‘(f) Standards of Conduct- While receiving instruction at the United States Air Force Institute of Technology, defense industry employees enrolled under this section, to the extent practicable, are subject to the same regulations governing academic performance, attendance, norms of behavior, and enrollment as apply to Government civilian employees receiving instruction at the school.’. (b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 9314 the following new item: ‘9314a. United States Air Force Institute of Technology: admission of defense industry civilians.’. Paragraph (5) of (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘Pharmacy, Supply, and Administration’ and inserting ‘Administrative Health Services’; (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘Sanitary Engineering’ and inserting ‘Preventive Medicine Sciences’; and (3) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘Optometry’ and inserting ‘Clinical Health Sciences’. Section 596(e)(1) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( TITLE VI--COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS Sec. 601. Ineligibility of certain Federal civilian employees for Reservist income replacement payments on account of availability of comparable benefits under another program. Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve forces. Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health care professionals. Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers. Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities. Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays. Sec. 616. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of referral bonuses. Sec. 621. Extension of authority to provide travel and transportation allowances for inactive duty training outside of normal commuting distances. Sec. 622. Travel and transportation allowances for attendance at Yellow Ribbon Reintegration events. Sec. 631. Elimination of cap on retired pay multiplier for members with greater than 30 years of service who retire for disability. Sec. 632. Payment date for retired and retainer pay. Sec. 633. Clarification of effect of ordering reserve component member to active duty to receive authorized medical care on reducing eligibility age for receipt of non-regular service retired pay. Sec. 634. Conformity of special compensation for members with injuries or illnesses requiring assistance in everyday living with monthly personal caregiver stipend under Department of Veterans Affairs program of comprehensive assistance for family caregivers. Sec. 635. Sense of Congress concerning age and service requirements for retired pay for non-regular service. Sec. 641. Addition of definition of morale, welfare, and recreation telephone services for use in contracts to provide such services for military personnel serving in combat zones. Sec. 642. Feasibility study on establishment of full exchange store in the Northern Mariana Islands. Sec. 643. Continuation of commissary and exchange operations at Brunswick Naval Air Station, Maine. Sec. 651. Report on basic allowance for housing for personnel assigned to sea duty. Sec. 652. Report on savings from enhanced management of special pay for aviation career officers extending period of active duty. Subtitle A--Pay and Allowances (a) Ineligibility for Payments- ‘(3) A civilian employee of the Federal Government who is also a member of a reserve component is not entitled to a payment under this section for any period for which the employee is entitled to-- ‘(A) a differential payment under section 5538 of title 5; or ‘(B) a comparable benefit under an administratively established program for civilian employees absent from a position of employment with the Federal Government in order to perform active duty in the uniformed services.’. (b) Effective Date- Subsection (b)(3) of Subtitle B--Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking ‘December 31, 2010’ and inserting ‘December 31, 2011’: (1) Section 308b(g), relating to Selected Reserve reenlistment bonus. (2) Section 308c(i), relating to Selected Reserve affiliation or enlistment bonus. (3) Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted members assigned to certain high-priority units. (4) Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment bonus for persons without prior service. (5) Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service. (6) Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service. (7) Section 910(g), relating to income replacement payments for reserve component members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service. (a) Title 10 Authorities- The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are amended by striking ‘December 31, 2010’ and inserting ‘December 31, 2011’: (1) Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer candidate accession program. (2) Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education loans for certain health professionals who serve in the Selected Reserve. (b) Title 37 Authorities- The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking ‘December 31, 2010’ and inserting ‘December 31, 2011’: (1) Section 302c-1(f), relating to accession and retention bonuses for psychologists. (2) Section 302d(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for registered nurses. (3) Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay for nurse anesthetists. (4) Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime specialties. (5) Section 302h(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for dental officers. (6) Section 302j(a), relating to accession bonus for pharmacy officers. (7) Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for medical officers in critically short wartime specialties. (8) Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for dental specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties. The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking ‘December 31, 2010’ and inserting ‘December 31, 2011’: (1) Section 312(f), relating to special pay for nuclear-qualified officers extending period of active service. (2) Section 312b(c), relating to nuclear career accession bonus. (3) Section 312c(d), relating to nuclear career annual incentive bonus. The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking ‘December 31, 2010’ and inserting ‘December 31, 2011’: (1) Section 331(h), relating to general bonus authority for enlisted members. (2) Section 332(g), relating to general bonus authority for officers. (3) Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for nuclear officers. (4) Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive pay and bonus authorities for officers. (5) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health professions. (6) Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay. (7) Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or special duty pay. (8) Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay or proficiency bonus. (9) Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to high priority units. The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking ‘December 31, 2010’ and inserting ‘December 31, 2011’: (1) Section 301b(a), relating to aviation officer retention bonus. (2) Section 307a(g), relating to assignment incentive pay. (3) Section 308(g), relating to reenlistment bonus for active members. (4) Section 309(e), relating to enlistment bonus. (5) Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for new officers in critical skills. (6) Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for conversion to military occupational specialty to ease personnel shortage. (7) Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for transfer between armed forces. (8) Section 330(f), relating to accession bonus for officer candidates. The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are amended by striking ‘December 31, 2010’ and inserting ‘December 31, 2011’: (1) Section 1030(i), relating to health professions referral bonus. (2) Section 3252(h), relating to Army referral bonus. Subtitle C--Travel and Transportation Allowances (a) Payment of Travel Costs Authorized- (1) IN GENERAL- Chapter 7 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 411k the following new section: ‘(a) Allowances Authorized- (1) Under uniform regulations prescribed by the Secretaries concerned, a member of the uniformed services authorized to attend a Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program event may be provided travel and transportation allowances in order that the member may attend a Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program event. ‘(2) Under uniform regulations prescribed by the Secretaries concerned, travel and transportation allowances may be provided for a person designated pursuant to subsection (b) in order for the person to accompany a member in attending a Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program event if the Secretary concerned determines that the presence of the person at the event may contribute to the purposes of the event for the member. ‘(b) Designation of Persons Eligible for Allowance- A member of the uniformed services who is eligible to attend a Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program event may designate one or more persons, including another member of the uniformed services, for purposes of receiving travel and transportation allowances described in subsection (c) to attend a Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program event. The designation of a person for purposes of this section shall be made in writing and may be changed at any time. ‘(c) Authorized Travel and Transportation- (1) The transportation authorized by subsection (a) is round-trip transportation between the home or place of business of the authorized person and the location of the Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program event. ‘(2) In addition to transportation under paragraph (1), the Secretary concerned may provide a per diem allowance or reimbursement for the actual and necessary expenses of the travel, or a combination thereof, but not to exceed the rates established under section 404(d) of this title. ‘(3) The transportation authorized by paragraph (1) may be provided by any of the following means: ‘(A) Transportation in-kind. ‘(B) A monetary allowance in place of transportation in-kind at a rate to be prescribed by the Secretaries concerned. ‘(C) Reimbursement for the commercial cost of transportation. ‘(4) An allowance payable under this subsection may be paid in advance. ‘(5) Reimbursement payable under this subsection may not exceed the cost of Government-procured commercial round-trip air travel. ‘(d) Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program Event Defined- In this section, the term ‘Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program event’ means an event authorized under section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT- The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item related to section 411k the following new item: ‘411l. Travel and transportation allowances: attendance of members and other persons at Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program events.’. (b) Applicability- No reimbursement may be provided under Subtitle D--Disability, Retired Pay and Survivor Benefits (a) Computation of Retired Pay- The table in (1) in the column designated ‘Column 2’, by inserting ‘, not to exceed 75%,’ after ‘percentage of disability’ both places it appears; and (2) by striking column 4. (b) Recomputation of Retired or Retainer Pay to Reflect Later Active Duty of Members Who First Became Members Before September 8, 1980- The table in section 1402(d) of such title is amended-- (1) in the column designated ‘Column 2’, by inserting ‘, not to exceed 75%,’ after ‘percentage of disability’; and (2) by striking column 4. (c) Recomputation of Retired or Retainer Pay to Reflect Later Active Duty of Members Who First Became Members After September 7, 1980- The table in section 1402a(d) of such title is amended-- (1) in the column designated ‘Column 2’, by inserting ‘, not to exceed 75 percent,’ after ‘percentage of disability’; and (2) by striking column 4. (d) Application of Amendments- The tables in sections 1401(a), 1402(d), and 1402a(d) of title 10, United States Code, as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act, shall continue to apply to the computation or recomputation of retired or retainer pay for persons who first became entitled to retired or retainer pay under subtitle A of such title on or before the date of the enactment of this Act. The amendments made by this section shall apply only with respect to persons who first become entitled to retired or retainer pay under such subtitle after that date. (a) Setting Payment Date- (1) by striking ‘Amounts’ and inserting ‘(a) Rounding- Amounts’; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: ‘(b) Payment Date- Amounts of retired pay and retainer pay due a retired member of the uniformed services shall be paid on the first day of each month beginning after the month in which the right to such pay accrues.’. (b) Clerical Amendments- (1) SECTION HEADING- The heading of such section is amended to read as follows: (2) TABLE OF SECTIONS- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 71 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 1412 and inserting the following new item: ‘1412. Administrative provisions.’. (c) Effective Date- Subsection (b) of ‘(iii) If a member described in subparagraph (A) is wounded or otherwise injured or becomes ill while serving on active duty pursuant to a call or order to active duty under a provision of law referred to in the first sentence of clause (i) or in clause (ii), and the member is then ordered to active duty under section 12301(h)(1) of this title to receive medical care for the wound, injury, or illness, each day of active duty under that order for medical care shall be treated as a continuation of the original call or order to active duty for purposes of reducing the eligibility age of the member under this paragraph.’. Subsection (c) of ‘(c) Amount- The amount of monthly special compensation payable to a member under subsection (a) shall be the amount as follows: ‘(1) The monthly amount of aid and attendance payable under section 1114(r)(2) of title 38. ‘(2) Upon the establishment by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs pursuant to subparagraph (C) of section 1720G(a)(3) of title 38 of the schedule of monthly personal caregiver stipends under the Department of Veterans Affairs program of comprehensive assistance for family caregivers under subparagraph (A)(ii)(V) of such section, the monthly personal caregiver stipend payable with respect to similarly circumstanced veterans under such schedule, rather than the amount specified in paragraph (1).’. It is the sense of Congress that-- (1) the amendments made to (2) steps should be taken by the Department of Defense to implement the congressional intent outlined in paragraph (1). Subtitle E--Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and Operations Section 885 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( ‘(c) Morale, Welfare, and Recreation Telephone Services Defined- In this section, the term ‘morale, welfare, and recreation telephone services’ means unofficial telephone calling center services supporting calling centers provided by the Army and Air Force Exchange Service, Navy Exchange Service Command, Marine Corps exchanges, or any other nonappropriated fund instrumentality of the United States under the jurisdiction of the Armed Forces which is conducted for the comfort, pleasure, contentment, or physical or mental improvement of members of the Armed Forces.’. Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report containing the results of a study to determine the feasibility of replacing the ‘Shoppette’ of the Army and Air Force Exchange Service in the Northern Mariana Islands with a full-service exchange store. (a) Continuation of Operations- The Secretary of Defense shall provide for the continuation of commissary and exchange operations at Brunswick Naval Air Station, Maine, until the later of the following: (1) The closure of Brunswick Naval Air Station. (2) The end of the 60-day period beginning on the date on which the Secretary of Defense makes the determination under subsection (b). (b) Review and Determination- Not earlier than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall-- (1) review any report prepared by the Comptroller General of the United States relating to commissary and exchange operations at Brunswick Naval Air Station, Maine; and (2) based on such review, make a determination regarding whether such operations should be continued. Subtitle F--Other Matters (a) Report Required- Not later than July 1, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the following: (1) A review of the standards used to determine the monthly rates of basic allowance for housing for personnel assigned to sea duty (under (2) A review of the legislative framework and policies applicable to eligibility and levels of compensation for single and married personnel, with and without dependents, who are assigned to sea duty. (3) Any recommendation for modifications of title 37, United States Code, relating to basic allowance for housing for personnel who are assigned to sea duty that the Secretary considers appropriate, including an estimate of the cost of each modification. (b) Elements of Reviews- In conducting the reviews for purposes of subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider whether existing law, policies, and housing standards are suitable in terms of the following: (1) The cost and availability of housing ashore for personnel assigned to sea duty. (2) The pay and allowances (other than basic allowance for housing) payable to personnel who are assigned to sea duty, including basic pay, career sea pay, and the family separation allowance. (3) The comparability in levels of compensation for single and married personnel, with and without dependents, who are assigned to sea duty. (4) The provision of appropriate quality of life and retention incentives for members in all grades who are assigned to sea duty. (5) The provision of appropriate recognition and motivation for promotion to higher military grades of personnel who are assigned to sea duty. (6) Budgetary constraints and rising personnel costs. (a) Report Required- Not later than August 1, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report regarding the use and management of the special pay programs authorized in (b) Elements of Report- The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A review of the programs operated by the Secretaries of the military departments, including-- (A) directives and guidelines issued by the Secretary of Defense; (B) the number of aviation officers receiving the special pay, listed by weapon system; (C) the weapon systems for which special pay is not authorized and the number of aviation officers affected by such exclusion; (D) the policy and structure of the programs and the retention philosophy supporting the policy and structure of the programs; (E) the amounts paid to individual aviation officers, annually and over the course of a career; and (F) the amounts budgeted annually for such programs. (2) An accounting of aviation officers receiving the special pay who have an active duty service commitment and the totals of aviation officers and allocated funding by types of active duty service commitment. (3) A review of retention trends for aviation officers, generally and by weapon system, within the military departments and an assessment of the factors that influence retention trends, and the reliability and durability of those trends if such factors are altered. (4) An assessment of the funds that can be saved by restructuring or eliminating such programs to reduce payments to aviation officers associated with those weapon systems with strong retention trends and aviation officers with active duty service commitments. (5) A review of the demand for former military aviation officers to fulfill commercial airline hiring requirements, recent data regarding airline hiring of former military aviation officers, and an assessment of the methods used by airlines to qualify pilot candidates for employment as commercial pilots. (6) Any recommendations for modifications of title 37, United States Code, relating to special pay for aviation career officers extending a period of active duty. TITLE VII--HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS Sec. 701. Extension of prohibition on increases in certain health care costs. Sec. 702. Extension of dependent coverage under the TRICARE program. Sec. 703. Survivor dental benefits. Sec. 704. Aural screenings for members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 705. Temporary prohibition on increase in copayments under retail pharmacy system of pharmacy benefits program. Sec. 711. Administration of TRICARE. Sec. 712. Postdeployment health reassessments for purposes of the medical tracking system for members of the Armed Forces deployed overseas. Sec. 713. Clarification of licensure requirements applicable to military health-care professionals who are members of the National Guard performing certain duty while in State status. Sec. 714. Improvements to oversight of medical training for Medical Corps officers. Sec. 715. Health information technology. Sec. 716. Education and training on use of pharmaceuticals in rehabilitation programs for wounded warriors. Sec. 721. Repeal of report requirement on separations resulting from refusal to participate in anthrax vaccine immunization program. Sec. 722. Comprehensive policy on consistent neurological cognitive assessments of members of the Armed Forces before and after deployment. Sec. 723. Assessment of post-traumatic stress disorder by military occupation. Sec. 724. Licensed mental health counselors and the TRICARE program. Subtitle A--Improvements to Health Benefits (a) Charges Under Contracts for Medical Care- (b) Charges for Inpatient Care- Section 1086(b)(3) of such title is amended by striking ‘September 30, 2010’ and inserting ‘September 30, 2011’. (a) Dependent Coverage- (1) IN GENERAL- Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: ‘(a) In General- In accordance with subsection (c), an individual described in subsection (b) shall be deemed to be a dependent (as described in section 1072(2)(D) of this title) for purposes of coverage under the TRICARE program. ‘(b) Individual Described- An individual described in this subsection is an individual who-- ‘(1) would be a dependent under section 1072(2) of this title but for exceeding an age limit under such section; ‘(2) has not attained the age of 26; ‘(3) is not eligible to enroll in an eligible employer-sponsored plan (as defined in section 5000A(f)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986); ‘(4) is not otherwise a dependent of a member or a former member under any subparagraph of section 1072(2) of this title; and ‘(5) meets other criteria specified in regulations prescribed by the Secretary, similar to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 2714(b) of the Public Health Service Act. ‘(c) Premium- (1) The Secretary shall prescribe by regulation a premium (or premiums) for coverage under the TRICARE program provided pursuant to this section to an individual described in subsection (b). ‘(2) The monthly amount of the premium in effect for a month for coverage under the TRICARE program pursuant to this section shall be the amount equal to the cost of such coverage that the Secretary determines on an appropriate actuarial basis. ‘(3) The Secretary shall prescribe the requirements and procedures applicable to the payment of premiums under this subsection. ‘(4) Amounts collected as premiums under this subsection shall be credited to the appropriation available for the Defense Health Program Account under section 1100 of this title, shall be merged with sums in such Account that are available for the fiscal year in which collected, and shall be available under subsection (b) of such section for such fiscal year.’. (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT- The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1110a the following new item: ‘1110b. TRICARE program: extension of dependent coverage.’. (b) Effective Date and Regulations- The amendments made by this section shall take effect on January 1, 2011. The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe an interim final rule with respect to such amendments, effective not later than January 1, 2011. Paragraph (2) of ‘(2) Such term includes any such dependent of a member who dies-- ‘(A) while on active duty for a period of more than 30 days; or ‘(B) while such member is a member of the Ready Reserve.’. (a) Tinnitus Screening- (1) STUDY REQUIRED- Not later than September 30, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study to identify the best tests currently available to screen members of the Armed Forces for tinnitus. (2) PLAN- Not later than December 31, 2011, the Secretary shall develop a plan to ensure that all members of the Armed Forces are screened for tinnitus prior to and after a deployment to a combat zone. (3) REPORT- Not later than December 31, 2011, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of the study under paragraph (1) and the plan under paragraph (2). (b) Improving Aural Protection for Members of the Armed Forces- (1) IN GENERAL- In accordance with section 721 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( (2) REPORT- Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the methods to improve aural protection examined under subsection (a). (c) Center of Excellence- The Secretary shall ensure that all studies, findings, plans, and reports conducted or submitted under this section are transmitted to the center of excellence established by section 721 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( During the period beginning on October 1, 2010, and ending on September 30, 2011, the cost sharing requirements established under paragraph (6) of (1) In the case of generic agents, $3. (2) In the case of formulary agents, $9. (3) In the case of nonformulary agents, $22. Subtitle B--Health Care Administration Subsection (a) of (1) by striking ‘Except’ and inserting ‘(1) Except’; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(2) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, the Secretary of Defense shall have responsibility for administering the TRICARE program and making any decision affecting such program.’. (a) Requirement for Postdeployment Health Reassessments- Paragraph (1) of subsection (b) of ‘(1)(A) The system described in subsection (a) shall include the use of predeployment medical examinations and postdeployment medical examinations (including the assessment of mental health and the drawing of blood samples) and postdeployment health reassessments to-- ‘(i) accurately record the health status of members before their deployment; ‘(ii) accurately record any changes in their health status during the course of their deployment; and ‘(iii) identify health concerns, including mental health concerns, that may become manifest several months following their deployment. ‘(B) The postdeployment medical examination shall be conducted when the member is redeployed or otherwise leaves an area in which the system is in operation (or as soon as possible thereafter). ‘(C) The postdeployment health reassessment shall be conducted at an appropriate time during the period beginning 90 days after the member is redeployed and ending 180 days after the member is redeployed.’. (b) Incorporation in Reassessments of Elements of Predeployment and Postdeployment Medical Examinations- Paragraph (2) of such subsection is amended by striking ‘and postdeployment medical examination’ and inserting ‘medical examination, postdeployment medical examination, and postdeployment health reassessment’. (c) Recordkeeping- Subsection (c) of such section is amended-- (1) by inserting ‘and reassessments’ after ‘medical examinations’; and (2) by inserting ‘and the prescription and administration of psychotropic medications’ after ‘including immunizations’. (d) Quality Assurance- Subsection (d) of such section is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘and postdeployment medical examinations’ and inserting ‘, postdeployment medical examinations, and postdeployment health reassessments’; and (2) in paragraph (2)-- (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘and reassessments’ after ‘postdeployment health assessments’; and (B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘and reassessments’ after ‘such assessments’. (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘or (3)’ after ‘paragraph (2)’; (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘as being described in this paragraph’ after ‘paragraph (1)’; and (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(3) A health-care professional referred to in paragraph (1) as being described in this paragraph is a member of the National Guard who-- ‘(A) has a current license to practice medicine, osteopathic medicine, dentistry, or another health profession; and ‘(B) is performing training or duty under section 502(f) of title 32 in response to an actual or potential disaster.’. (a) Review of Training Programs for Medical Officers- (1) REVIEW- The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of training programs for medical officers (as defined in (A) Programs at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences that award a medical doctor degree. (B) Selected residency programs at military medical treatment facilities, as determined by the Secretary, to include at least one program in each of the specialties of-- (i) anesthesiology; (ii) emergency medicine; (iii) family medicine; (iv) general surgery; (v) neurology; (vi) obstetrics/gynecology; (vii) pathology; (viii) pediatrics; and (ix) psychiatry. (2) REPORT- Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the findings of the review under paragraph (1). (b) Annual Report on Graduate Medical Education Programs- (1) ANNUAL REPORT- Not later than April 1, 2011, and annually thereafter through 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of the graduate medical education programs of the Department of Defense. (2) ELEMENTS- Each report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An identification of each graduate medical education program of the Department of Defense in effect during the previous fiscal year, including for each such program, the military department responsible, the location, the medical specialty, the period of training required, and the number of students by year. (B) The status of each program referred to in subparagraph (A), including, for each such program, an identification of the fiscal year in which the last action was taken with respect to each of the following: (i) Initial accreditation. (ii) Continued accreditation. (iii) If applicable, probation, and the reasons for probationary status. (iv) If applicable, withheld or withdrawn accreditation, and the reasons for such action. (C) A discussion of trends in the graduate medical education programs of the Department. (D) A discussion of challenges faced by such programs, and a description and assessment of strategies and plans to address such challenges. (E) Such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate. (a) Enterprise Risk Assessment Methodology Study- (1) STUDY REQUIRED- The Secretary of Defense shall conduct an enterprise risk assessment methodology study of all health information technology programs of the Department of Defense. (2) REPORT- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of the study required under paragraph (1). (b) Report on Health Information Technology Organizational Structure and Future Plans- (1) REPORT REQUIRED- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the organizational structure for health information technology within the Department of Defense. (2) ELEMENTS- The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) Organizational charts for all organizations involved with health information technology showing, at a minimum, the senior positions in each office and each activity. (B) A description of the functions and responsibilities, to include policy formulation, policy and program execution, and program oversight, of each senior position for health information technology. (C) An assessment of how well the health information systems of the Department of Defense interact with the health information systems of-- (i) the Department of Veterans Affairs; and (ii) entities other than the Federal Government. (D) A description of the role played by the Interagency Program Office established by section 1635 of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of (E) A complete description of all future plans for legacy systems and new electronic health record initiatives, including the joint virtual lifetime electronic record. (F) The results of the survey described in paragraph (3). (3) SURVEY- The Secretary shall conduct a survey of users of the health information technology systems of the Department of Defense to assess the benefits and failings of such systems. (4) DEFINITIONS- In this subsection: (A) The term ‘senior position’ means a position filled by a member of the senior executive service, a position on the Executive Schedule established pursuant to title 5, United States Code, or a position filled by a general or flag officer. (B) The term ‘senior personnel’ means personnel who are members of the senior executive service, who fill a position listed on the Executive Schedule established pursuant to title 5, United States Code, or who are general or flag officers. (c) Report on GAO Report Required- Not later than March 31, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the report by the Comptroller General of the United States titled ‘Information Technology: Opportunities Exist to Improve Management of DOD’s Electronic Health Record Initiative’ (GAO-11-50), including-- (1) the status of implementing the recommendations made in such report; and (2) for each such recommendation that has not been implemented, the reason why the recommendation has not been implemented. (a) Education and Training Required- The Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement training, available through the Internet or other means, on the use of pharmaceuticals in rehabilitation programs for seriously ill or injured members of the Armed Forces. (b) Recipients of Training- The training developed and implemented under subsection (a) shall be training for each category of individuals as follows: (1) Patients in or transitioning to a wounded warrior unit, with special accommodation in such training for such patients with cognitive disabilities. (2) Nonmedical case managers. (3) Military leaders. (4) Family members. (c) Elements of Training- The training developed and implemented under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An overview of the fundamentals of safe prescription drug use. (2) Familiarization with the benefits and risks of using pharmaceuticals in rehabilitation therapies. (3) Examples of the use of pharmaceuticals for individuals with multiple, complex injuries, including traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder. (4) Familiarization with means of finding additional resources for information on pharmaceuticals. (5) Familiarization with basic elements of pain and pharmaceutical management. (6) Familiarization with complementary and alternative therapies. (d) Tailoring of Training- The training developed and implemented under subsection (a) shall appropriately tailor the elements specified in subsection (c) for and among each category of individuals set forth in subsection (b). (e) Review of Pharmacy- (1) REVIEW- The Secretary shall review all policies and procedures of the Department of Defense regarding the use of pharmaceuticals in rehabilitation programs for seriously ill or injured members of the Armed Forces. (2) RECOMMENDATIONS- Not later than September 20, 2011, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees any recommendations for administrative or legislative action with respect to the review under paragraph (1) as the Secretary considers appropriate. Subtitle C--Other Matters (1) by striking ‘(a) Requirement To Establish System- ’; and (2) by striking subsection (b). (a) Comprehensive Policy Required- Not later than January 31, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement a comprehensive policy on consistent neurological cognitive assessments of members of the Armed Forces before and after deployment. (b) Updates- The Secretary shall revise the policy required by subsection (a) on a periodic basis in accordance with experience and evolving best practice guidelines. (a) Assessment- The Secretaries of the military departments shall each conduct an assessment of post-traumatic stress disorder incidence by military occupation, including identification of military occupations with a high incidence of such disorder. (b) Report- Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries shall each submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the assessment under subsection (a). (c) Centers of Excellence- The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that all studies, findings, plans, and reports conducted or submitted under this section are transmitted to the centers of excellence established by sections 1621 and 1622 of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Not later than June 20, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe the regulations required by section 717 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( TITLE VIII--ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED MATTERS Sec. 801. Disclosure to litigation support contractors. Sec. 802. Designation of engine development and procurement program as major subprogram. Sec. 803. Enhancement of Department of Defense authority to respond to combat and safety emergencies through rapid acquisition and deployment of urgently needed supplies. Sec. 804. Review of acquisition process for rapid fielding of capabilities in response to urgent operational needs. Sec. 805. Acquisition of major automated information system programs. Sec. 806. Requirements for information relating to supply chain risk. Sec. 811. Cost estimates for program baselines and contract negotiations for major defense acquisition and major automated information system programs. Sec. 812. Management of manufacturing risk in major defense acquisition programs. Sec. 813. Modification and extension of requirements of the Weapon System Acquisition Reform Act of 2009. Sec. 814. Inclusion of major subprograms to major defense acquisition programs under various acquisition-related requirements. Sec. 821. Provisions relating to fire resistant fiber for production of military uniforms. Sec. 822. Repeal of requirement for certain procurements from firms in the small arms production industrial base. Sec. 823. Review of regulatory definition relating to production of specialty metals. Sec. 824. Guidance relating to rights in technical data. Sec. 825. Extension of sunset date for certain protests of task and delivery order contracts. Sec. 826. Inclusion of option amounts in limitations on authority of the Department of Defense to carry out certain prototype projects. Sec. 827. Permanent authority for Defense Acquisition Challenge Program; pilot expansion of Program. Sec. 828. Energy savings performance contracts. Sec. 829. Definition of materials critical to national security. Sec. 831. Oversight and accountability of contractors performing private security functions in areas of combat operations. Sec. 832. Extension of regulations on contractors performing private security functions to areas of other significant military operations. Sec. 833. Standards and certification for private security contractors. Sec. 834. Enhancements of authority of Secretary of Defense to reduce or deny award fees to companies found to jeopardize the health or safety of Government personnel. Sec. 835. Annual joint report and Comptroller General review on contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Sec. 841. Improvements to structure and functioning of Joint Requirements Oversight Council. Sec. 842. Department of Defense policy on acquisition and performance of sustainable products and services. Sec. 843. Assessment and plan for critical rare earth materials in defense applications. Sec. 844. Review of national security exception to competition. Sec. 845. Requirement for entities with facility clearances that are not under foreign ownership control or influence mitigation. Sec. 846. Procurement of photovoltaic devices. Sec. 847. Non-availability exception from Buy American requirements for procurement of hand or measuring tools. Sec. 848. Contractor logistics support of contingency operations. Sec. 860. Short title. Sec. 861. Improvements to the management of the defense acquisition system. Sec. 862. Comptroller General report on Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System. Sec. 863. Requirements for the acquisition of services. Sec. 864. Review of defense acquisition guidance. Sec. 865. Requirement to review references to services acquisition throughout the Federal Acquisition Regulation and the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement. Sec. 866. Pilot program on acquisition of military purpose nondevelopmental items. Sec. 871. Acquisition workforce excellence. Sec. 872. Amendments to the acquisition workforce demonstration project. Sec. 873. Career development for civilian and military personnel in the acquisition workforce. Sec. 874. Recertification and training requirements. Sec. 875. Information technology acquisition workforce. Sec. 876. Definition of acquisition workforce. Sec. 877. Defense Acquisition University curriculum review. Sec. 881. Audit readiness of financial statements of the Department of Defense. Sec. 882. Review of obligation and expenditure thresholds. Sec. 883. Disclosure and traceability of the cost of Department of Defense health care contracts. Sec. 891. Expansion of the industrial base. Sec. 892. Price trend analysis for supplies and equipment purchased by the Department of Defense. Sec. 893. Contractor business systems. Sec. 894. Review and recommendations on eliminating barriers to contracting with the Department of Defense. Sec. 895. Inclusion of the providers of services and information technology in the national technology and industrial base. Sec. 896. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy; Industrial Base Fund. Subtitle A--Acquisition Policy and Management (a) In General- (1) in subsection (c)(2)-- (A) by striking ‘subsection (a), allowing’ and inserting ‘subsection (a)-- ‘(A) allowing’; and (B) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: ‘(B) allowing a covered litigation support contractor access to and use of any technical, proprietary, or confidential data delivered under a contract for the sole purpose of providing litigation support to the Government in the form of administrative, technical, or professional services during or in anticipation of litigation; or’; and (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following: ‘(g) In this section, the term ‘covered litigation support contractor’ means a contractor (including an expert or technical consultant) under contract with the Department of Defense to provide litigation support, which contractor executes a contract with the Government agreeing to and acknowledging-- ‘(1) that proprietary or nonpublic technical data furnished will be accessed and used only for the purposes stated in that contract; ‘(2) that the covered litigation support contractor will take all reasonable steps to protect the proprietary and nonpublic nature of the technical data furnished to the covered litigation support contractor; and ‘(3) that such technical data provided to the covered litigation support contractor under the authority of this section shall not be used by the covered litigation support contractor to compete against the third party for Government or non-Government contracts.’. (b) Effective Date- The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (a) Designation as Major Subprogram- Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall designate an engine development and procurement program as a major subprogram of the F-35 Lightning II aircraft major defense acquisition program, in accordance with (b) Original Baseline- For purposes of reporting requirements referred to in (c) Actions Following Critical Cost Growth- (1) IN GENERAL- Subject to paragraph (2), to the extent that the Secretary elects to restructure the Lightning II aircraft major defense acquisition program subsequent to a reassessment and actions required by subsections (a) and (c) of (2) LIMITATION- Actions taken in accordance with paragraph (1) shall be considered to meet the requirements of (a) Requirement To Establish Procedures- Subsection (a) of section 806 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 ( (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ‘items’ and inserting ‘supplies’; and (2) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following new paragraph (1): ‘(1)(A) currently under development by the Department of Defense or available from the commercial sector; or ‘(B) require only minor modifications to supplies described in subparagraph (A); and’. (b) Issues To Be Addressed- Subsection (b) of such section is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘items’ and inserting ‘supplies’; and (2) in paragraph (2)-- (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking ‘items’ and inserting ‘supplies’; (B) in subparagraphs (A) and (B), by striking ‘an item’ and inserting ‘the supplies’; and (C) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ‘and utilization’ after ‘deployment’. (c) Response to Combat Emergencies- Subsection (c) of such section is amended-- (1) by striking ‘equipment’ each place it appears other than paragraph (5) and inserting ‘supplies’; (2) by striking ‘combat capability’ each place it appears; (3) by striking ‘that has resulted in combat fatalities’ each place it appears and inserting ‘that has resulted in combat casualties, or is likely to result in combat casualties’; (4) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘is’ and inserting ‘are’; (5) in paragraph (2)-- (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘is’ each place it appears and inserting ‘are’; and (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘fatalities’ at the end and inserting ‘casualties’; (6) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows: ‘(3) In any fiscal year in which the Secretary makes a determination described in paragraph (1), the Secretary may use any funds available to the Department of Defense for that fiscal year for acquisitions of supplies under this section if the determination includes a written finding that the use of such funds is necessary to address the combat capability deficiency in a timely manner. The authority of this section may not be used to acquire supplies in an amount aggregating more than $200,000,000 during any such fiscal year.’; (7) in paragraph (4)-- (A) by inserting ‘, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget,’ after ‘shall’; and (B) by striking ‘Each such notice’ and inserting ‘For each such determination, the notice under the preceding sentence’; and (8) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘that equipment’ and inserting ‘the supplies concerned’. (d) Waiver of Certain Statues and Regulations- Subsection (d)(1) of such section is amended by striking ‘equipment’ in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) and inserting ‘supplies’. (e) Testing Requirement- Subsection (e) of such section is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1)-- (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking ‘an item’ and inserting ‘the supplies’; and (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘of the item’ and all that follows through ‘requirements document’ and inserting ‘of the supplies in meeting the original requirements for the supplies (as stated in a statement of the urgent operational need’; (2) in paragraph (2)-- (A) by striking ‘an item’ and inserting ‘supplies’; and (B) by striking ‘the item’ and inserting ‘the supplies’; and (3) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘items’ each place it appears and inserting ‘supplies’. (f) Limitation- Subsection (f) of such section is amended to read as follows: ‘(f) Limitation- In the case of supplies that are part of a major system for which a low-rate initial production quantity determination has been made pursuant to (a) Review of Rapid Acquisition Process Required- (1) IN GENERAL- Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall complete a review of the process for the fielding of capabilities in response to urgent operational needs and submit a report on the review to the congressional defense committees. (2) REVIEW AND REPORT REQUIREMENTS- The review pursuant to this section shall include consideration of various improvements to the acquisition process for rapid fielding of capabilities in response to urgent operational needs. For each improvement, the report on the review shall discuss-- (A) the Department’s review of the improvement; (B) if the improvement is being implemented by the Department, a schedule for implementing the improvement; and (C) if the improvement is not being implemented by the Department, an explanation of why the improvement is not being implemented. (3) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED- The improvements that shall be considered during the review are the following: (A) Providing a streamlined, expedited, and tightly integrated iterative approach to-- (i) the identification and validation of urgent operational needs; (ii) the analysis of alternatives and identification of preferred solutions; (iii) the development and approval of appropriate requirements and acquisition documents; (iv) the identification and minimization of development, integration, and manufacturing risks; (v) the consideration of operation and sustainment costs; (vi) the allocation of appropriate funding; and (vii) the rapid production and delivery of required capabilities. (B) Clearly defining the roles and responsibilities of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the military departments, and other components of the Department of Defense for carrying out all phases of the process. (C) Designating a senior official within the Office of the Secretary of Defense with primary responsibility for making recommendations to the Secretary on the use of the authority provided by subsections (c) and (d) of section 806 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 ( (D) Establishing a target date for the fielding of a capability pursuant to each validated urgent operational need. (E) Implementing a system for-- (i) documenting key process milestones, such as funding, acquisition, fielding, and assessment decisions and actions; and (ii) tracking the cost, schedule, and performance of acquisitions conducted pursuant to the process. (F) Establishing a formal feedback mechanism for the commanders of the combatant commands to provide information to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and senior acquisition officials on how well fielded solutions are meeting urgent operational needs. (G) Establishing a dedicated source of funding for the rapid fielding of capabilities in response to urgent operational needs. (H) Issuing guidance to provide for the appropriate transition of capabilities acquired through rapid fielding into the traditional budget, requirements, and acquisition process for purposes of contracts for follow-on production, sustainment, and logistics support. (I) Such other improvements as the Secretary considers appropriate. (b) Discriminating Urgent Operational Needs From Traditional Requirements- (1) EXPEDITED REVIEW PROCESS- Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop and implement an expedited review process to determine whether capabilities proposed as urgent operational needs are appropriate for fielding through the process for the rapid fielding of capabilities or should be fielded through the traditional acquisition process. (2) ELEMENTS- The review process developed and implemented pursuant to paragraph (1) shall-- (A) apply to the rapid fielding of capabilities in response to joint urgent operational need statements and to other urgent operational needs statements generated by the military departments and the combatant commands; (B) identify officials responsible for making determinations described in paragraph (1); (C) establish appropriate time periods for making such determinations; (D) set forth standards and criteria for making such determinations based on considerations of urgency, risk, and life-cycle management; (E) establish appropriate thresholds for the applicability of the review process, or of elements of the review process; and (F) authorize appropriate officials to make exceptions from standards and criteria established under subparagraph (D) in exceptional circumstances. (3) COVERED CAPABILITIES- The review process developed and implemented pursuant to paragraph (1) shall provide that, subject to such exceptions as the Secretary considers appropriate for purposes of this section, the acquisition process for rapid fielding of capabilities in response to urgent operational needs is appropriate only for capabilities that-- (A) can be fielded within a period of two to 24 months; (B) do not require substantial development effort; (C) are based on technologies that are proven and available; and (D) can appropriately be acquired under fixed price contracts. (4) INCLUSION IN REPORT- The Secretary shall include a description of the expedited review process implemented pursuant to paragraph (1) in the report required by subsection (a). (a) Program To Improve Information Technology Processes- (1) IN GENERAL- Chapter 131 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2223 the following new section: ‘(a) Establishment of Program- The Secretary of Defense shall establish a program to improve the planning and oversight processes for the acquisition of major automated information systems by the Department of Defense. ‘(b) Program Components- The program established under subsection (a) shall include-- ‘(1) a documented process for information technology acquisition planning, requirements development and management, project management and oversight, earned value management, and risk management; ‘(2) the development of appropriate metrics that can be implemented and monitored on a real-time basis for performance measurement of-- ‘(A) processes and development status of investments in major automated information system programs; ‘(B) continuous process improvement of such programs; and ‘(C) achievement of program and investment outcomes; ‘(3) a process to ensure that key program personnel have an appropriate level of experience, training, and education in the planning, acquisition, execution, management, and oversight of information technology systems; ‘(4) a process to ensure sufficient resources and infrastructure capacity for test and evaluation of information technology systems; ‘(5) a process to ensure that military departments and Defense Agencies adhere to established processes and requirements relating to the planning, acquisition, execution, management, and oversight of information technology programs and developments; and ‘(6) a process under which an appropriate Department of Defense official may intervene or terminate the funding of an information technology investment if the investment is at risk of not achieving major project milestones.’. (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 131 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2223 the following new item: ‘2223a. Information technology acquisition planning and oversight requirements.’. (b) Annual Report to Congress- ‘(5) For each major automated information system program for which such information has not been provided in a previous annual report-- ‘(A) a description of the business case analysis (if any) that has been prepared for the program and key functional requirements for the program; ‘(B) a description of the analysis of alternatives conducted with regard to the program; ‘(C) an assessment of the extent to which the program, or portions of the program, have technical requirements of sufficient clarity that the program, or portions of the program, may be feasibly procured under firm, fixed-price contracts; ‘(D) the most recent independent cost estimate or cost analysis for the program provided by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation in accordance with section 2334(a)(6) of this title; ‘(E) a certification by a Department of Defense acquisition official with responsibility for the program that all technical and business requirements have been reviewed and validated to ensure alignment with the business case; and ‘(F) an explanation of the basis for the certification described in subparagraph (E). ‘(6) For each major automated information system program for which the information required under paragraph (5) has been provided in a previous annual report, a summary of any significant changes to the information previously provided.’. (a) Authority- Subject to subsection (b), the head of a covered agency may-- (1) carry out a covered procurement action; and (2) limit, notwithstanding any other provision of law, in whole or in part, the disclosure of information relating to the basis for carrying out a covered procurement action. (b) Determination and Notification- The head of a covered agency may exercise the authority provided in subsection (a) only after-- (1) obtaining a joint recommendation by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, on the basis of a risk assessment by the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, that there is a significant supply chain risk to a covered system; (2) making a determination in writing, in unclassified or classified form, with the concurrence of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, that-- (A) use of the authority in subsection (a)(1) is necessary to protect national security by reducing supply chain risk; (B) less intrusive measures are not reasonably available to reduce such supply chain risk; and (C) in a case where the head of the covered agency plans to limit disclosure of information under subsection (a)(2), the risk to national security due to the disclosure of such information outweighs the risk due to not disclosing such information; and (3) providing a classified or unclassified notice of the determination made under paragraph (2) to the appropriate congressional committees, which notice shall include-- (A) the information required by (B) the joint recommendation by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense as specified in paragraph (1); (C) a summary of the risk assessment by the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence that serves as the basis for the joint recommendation specified in paragraph (1); and (D) a summary of the basis for the determination, including a discussion of less intrusive measures that were considered and why they were not reasonably available to reduce supply chain risk. (c) Delegation- The head of a covered agency may not delegate the authority provided in subsection (a) or the responsibility to make a determination under subsection (b) to an official below the level of the service acquisition executive for the agency concerned. (d) Limitation on Disclosure- If the head of a covered agency has exercised the authority provided in subsection (a)(2) to limit disclosure of information-- (1) no action undertaken by the agency head under such authority shall be subject to review in a bid protest before the Government Accountability Office or in any Federal court; and (2) the agency head shall-- (A) notify appropriate parties of a covered procurement action and the basis for such action only to the extent necessary to effectuate the covered procurement action; (B) notify other Department of Defense components or other Federal agencies responsible for procurements that may be subject to the same or similar supply chain risk, in a manner and to the extent consistent with the requirements of national security; and (C) ensure the confidentiality of any such notifications. (e) Definitions- In this section: (1) HEAD OF A COVERED AGENCY- The term ‘head of a covered agency’ means each of the following: (A) The Secretary of Defense. (B) The Secretary of the Army. (C) The Secretary of the Navy. (D) The Secretary of the Air Force. (2) COVERED PROCUREMENT ACTION- The term ‘covered procurement action’ means any of the following actions, if the action takes place in the course of conducting a covered procurement: (A) The exclusion of a source that fails to meet qualification standards established in accordance with the requirements of (B) The exclusion of a source that fails to achieve an acceptable rating with regard to an evaluation factor providing for the consideration of supply chain risk in the evaluation of proposals for the award of a contract or the issuance of a task or delivery order. (C) The decision to withhold consent for a contractor to subcontract with a particular source or to direct a contractor for a covered system to exclude a particular source from consideration for a subcontract under the contract. (3) COVERED PROCUREMENT- The term ‘covered procurement’ means-- (A) a source selection for a covered system or a covered item of supply involving either a performance specification, as provided in (B) the consideration of proposals for and issuance of a task or delivery order for a covered system or a covered item of supply, as provided in (C) any contract action involving a contract for a covered system or a covered item of supply where such contract includes a clause establishing requirements relating to supply chain risk. (4) SUPPLY CHAIN RISK- The term ‘supply chain risk’ means the risk that an adversary may sabotage, maliciously introduce unwanted function, or otherwise subvert the design, integrity, manufacturing, production, distribution, installation, operation, or maintenance of a covered system so as to surveil, deny, disrupt, or otherwise degrade the function, use, or operation of such system. (5) COVERED SYSTEM- The term ‘covered system’ means a national security system, as that term is defined in (6) COVERED ITEM OF SUPPLY- The term ‘covered item of supply’ means an item of information technology (as that term is defined in (7) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES- The term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means-- (A) in the case of a covered system included in the National Intelligence Program or the Military Intelligence Program, the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the congressional defense committees; and (B) in the case of a covered system not otherwise included in subparagraph (A), the congressional defense committees. (f) Effective Date- The requirements of this section shall take effect on the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply to-- (1) contracts that are awarded on or after such date; and (2) task and delivery orders that are issued on or after such date pursuant to contracts that awarded before, on, or after such date. (g) Sunset- The authority provided in this section shall expire on the date that is three years after the date of the enactment of this Act. Subtitle B--Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition Programs (1) in subsection (d)-- (A) in paragraph (1)-- (i) by striking ‘paragraph (2)’ and inserting ‘paragraph (3)’; and (ii) by striking ‘, the rationale for selecting such confidence level, and, if such confidence level is less than 80 percent, the justification for selecting a confidence level of less than 80 percent; and’ and inserting ‘and the rationale for selecting such confidence level;’; (B) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and (C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): ‘(2) ensure that such confidence level provides a high degree of confidence that the program can be completed without the need for significant adjustment to program budgets; and’; (2) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections (f) and (g), respectively; and (3) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e): ‘(e) Estimates for Program Baseline and Analyses and Targets for Contract Negotiation Purposes- (1) The policies, procedures, and guidance issued by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation in accordance with the requirements of subsection (a) shall provide that-- ‘(A) cost estimates developed for baseline descriptions and other program purposes conducted pursuant to subsection (a)(6) are not to be used for the purpose of contract negotiations or the obligation of funds; and ‘(B) cost analyses and targets developed for the purpose of contract negotiations and the obligation of funds are based on the Government’s reasonable expectation of successful contractor performance in accordance with the contractor’s proposal and previous experience. ‘(2) The Program Manager and contracting officer for each major defense acquisition program and major automated information system program shall ensure that cost analyses and targets developed for the purpose of contract negotiations and the obligation of funds are carried out in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (1) and the policies, procedures, and guidance issued by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. ‘(3) Funds that are made available for a major defense acquisition program or major automated information system program in accordance with a cost estimate conducted pursuant to subsection (a)(6), but are excess to a cost analysis or target developed pursuant to paragraph (2), shall remain available for obligation in accordance with the terms of applicable authorization and appropriations Acts. ‘(4) Funds described in paragraph (3)-- ‘(A) may be used-- ‘(i) to cover any increased program costs identified by a revised cost analysis or target developed pursuant to paragraph (2); ‘(ii) to acquire additional end items in accordance with the requirements of section 2308 of this title; or ‘(iii) to cover the cost of risk reduction and process improvements; and ‘(B) may be reprogrammed, in accordance with established procedures, only if determined to be excess to program needs on the basis of a cost estimate developed with the concurrence of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation.’. (a) Guidance Required- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue comprehensive guidance on the management of manufacturing risk in major defense acquisition programs. (b) Elements- The guidance issued under subsection (a) shall, at a minimum-- (1) require the use of manufacturing readiness levels as a basis for measuring, assessing, reporting, and communicating manufacturing readiness and risk on major defense acquisition programs throughout the Department of Defense; (2) provide guidance on the definition of manufacturing readiness levels and how manufacturing readiness levels should be used to assess manufacturing risk and readiness in major defense acquisition programs; (3) specify manufacturing readiness levels that should be achieved at key milestones and decision points for major defense acquisition programs; (4) identify tools and models that may be used to assess, manage, and reduce risks that are identified in the course of manufacturing readiness assessments for major defense acquisition programs; and (5) require appropriate consideration of the manufacturing readiness and manufacturing readiness processes of potential contractors and subcontractors as a part of the source selection process for major defense acquisition programs. (c) Manufacturing Readiness Expertise- The Secretary shall ensure that-- (1) the acquisition workforce chapter of the annual strategic workforce plan required by (2) the need of the Department for manufacturing readiness knowledge and skills is given appropriate consideration, comparable to the consideration given to other program management functions, as the Department identifies areas of need for funding through the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund established in accordance with the requirements of (d) Major Defense Acquisition Program Defined- In this section, the term ‘major defense acquisition program’ has the meaning given that term in (a) Extension of Reporting Requirements- Section 102(b) of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 ( (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘, and not later than February 15 of each year from 2011 through 2014’ after ‘Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act’; and (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘The first annual report’ and inserting ‘Each annual report from 2010 through 2014’. (b) Clarification That Prototypes May Be Acquired From Commercial, Government, or Academic Sources- Paragraph (4) of section 203(a) of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 ( ‘(4) That prototypes-- ‘(A) may be required under paragraph (1) or (3) for the system to be acquired or, if prototyping of the system is not feasible, for critical subsystems of the system; and ‘(B) may be acquired from commercial, government, or academic sources.’. (c) Clarification That Certifications Are Not Required for Major Defense Acquisition Programs Following Milestone C Approval- Section 204(c)(2) of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (123 Stat. 1724) is amended-- (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘; and’ and inserting a semicolon; (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end and inserting ‘; and’; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: ‘(C) has not yet achieved a Milestone C approval.’. (d) Clarification That Certain Milestone B Certification Criteria May Be Waived- (1) WAIVER AUTHORITY- Effective as of May 22, 2009, (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘specified in paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a)’ and inserting ‘specified in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection (a)’; and (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a)’ and inserting ‘specified in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (a)’. (2) DETERMINATION REGARDING SATISFACTION OF CERTIFICATION COMPONENTS- Effective as of May 22, 2009, and as if included therein as enacted, section 205(b)(1) of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 ( (e) Correction to Reference- Effective as of May 22, 2009, and as if included therein as enacted, section 205(c) of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 ( (a) Reporting Requirements- (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; (2) by inserting ‘(1)’ before ‘If the Secretary’; (3) in subparagraph (A), as so redesignated, by inserting ‘(other than as provided in paragraph (2))’ before the semicolon; and (4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(2) For a major defense acquisition program for which a designation of a major subprogram has been made under subsection (a), unit costs under this chapter shall be submitted in accordance with the definitions in subsection (d).’. (b) Milestone A Approval Certification Requirements- Section 2366a of such title is amended-- (1) in subsection (b)-- (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘a major defense acquisition program certified by the Milestone Decision Authority under subsection (a), if the projected cost of the program’ and inserting ‘a major defense acquisition program certified by the Milestone Decision Authority under subsection (a) or a designated major subprogram of such program, if the projected cost of the program or subprogram’; and (B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘or designated major subprogram’ after ‘major defense acquisition program’; and (2) in subsection (c)-- (A) by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), (4), and (5) as paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and (6), respectively; and (B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): ‘(2) The term ‘designated major subprogram’ means a major subprogram of a major defense acquisition program designated under section 2430a(a)(1) of this title.’. (c) Milestone B Approval Certification Requirements- Section 2366b of such title is amended-- (1) in subsection (b)(1)-- (A) by striking ‘any changes to the program’ and inserting ‘any changes to the program or a designated major subprogram of such program’; and (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘otherwise cause the program’ and inserting ‘otherwise cause the program or subprogram’; and (2) in subsection (g)-- (A) by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) as paragraphs (3), (4), and (5), respectively; and (B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): ‘(2) The term ‘designated major subprogram’ means a major subprogram of a major defense acquisition program designated under section 2430a(a)(1) of this title.’. (d) Conforming Amendments to Section 2399- Subsection (a) of section 2399 of such title is amended to read as follows: ‘(a) Condition for Proceeding Beyond Low-rate Initial Production- (1) The Secretary of Defense shall provide that a covered major defense acquisition program or a covered designated major subprogram may not proceed beyond low-rate initial production until initial operational test and evaluation of the program or subprogram is completed. ‘(2) In this subsection: ‘(A) The term ‘covered major defense acquisition program’ means a major defense acquisition program that involves the acquisition of a weapon system that is a major system within the meaning of that term in section 2302(5) of this title. ‘(B) The term ‘covered designated major subprogram’ means a major subprogram designated under section 2430a(a)(1) of this title that is a major subprogram of a covered major defense acquisition program.’. (e) Conforming Amendments to Section 2434- Section 2434(a) of such title is amended-- (1) by inserting ‘(1)’ before ‘The Secretary of Defense’; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(2) The provisions of this section shall apply to any major subprogram of a major defense acquisition program (as designated under section 2430a(a)(1) of this title) in the same manner as those provisions apply to a major defense acquisition program, and any reference in this section to a program shall be treated as including such a subprogram.’. Subtitle C--Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and Limitations (a) Extension- Section 829 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (b) Prohibition on Specification in Solicitations- No solicitation issued before January 1, 2015, by the Department of Defense may include a requirement that proposals submitted pursuant to such solicitation must include the use of fire resistant rayon fiber. (c) Report Required- (1) IN GENERAL- Not later than March 15, 2011, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the supply chain for fire resistant fiber for the production of military uniforms. (2) ELEMENTS- The report required by paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, an analysis of the following: (A) The current and anticipated sources of fire resistant rayon fiber for the production of military uniforms. (B) The extent to which fire resistant rayon fiber has unique properties that provide advantages for the production of military uniforms. (C) The extent to which the efficient procurement of fire resistant rayon fiber for the production of military uniforms is impeded by existing statutory or regulatory requirements. (D) The actions the Department of Defense has taken to identify alternatives to fire resistant rayon fiber for the production of military uniforms. (E) The extent to which such alternatives provide an adequate substitute for fire resistant rayon fiber for the production of military uniforms. (F) The impediments to the use of such alternatives, and the actions the Department has taken to overcome such impediments. (G) The extent to which uncertainty regarding the future availability of fire resistant rayon fiber results in instability or inefficiency for elements of the United States textile industry that use fire resistant rayon fiber, and the extent to which that instability or inefficiency results in less efficient business practices, impedes investment and innovation, and thereby results or may result in higher costs, delayed delivery, or a lower quality of product delivered to the Government. (H) The extent to which any modifications to existing law or regulation may be necessary to ensure the efficient acquisition of fire resistant fiber or alternative fire resistant products for the production of military uniforms. (a) Repeal- (b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 146 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2473. (a) Review Required- The Secretary of Defense shall review the regulations specified in subsection (b) to ensure that the definition of the term ‘produce’ in such regulations complies with the requirements of (b) Regulations Specified- The regulations referred to in subsection (a) are any portion of subpart 252.2 of the defense supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation that includes a definition of the term ‘produce’ for purposes of implementing (c) Completion of Review- The Secretary shall complete the review required by subsection (a) and any necessary and appropriate revisions to the defense supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (a) Review of Guidance- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall review guidance issued by the military departments on the implementation of (1) preserves the option of competition for contracts for the production and sustainment of systems or subsystems that are developed exclusively with Federal funds as defined in accordance with the amendments made by this section; and (2) is not required to pay more than once for the same technical data. (b) Rights in Technical Data- (1) in paragraph (2)(F)(i)-- (A) by redesignating subclauses (I) and (II) as subclauses (II) and (III), respectively; and (B) by inserting before subclause (II), as so redesignated, the following new subclause (I): ‘(I) rights in technical data described in subparagraph (A) for which a use or release restriction has been erroneously asserted by a contractor or subcontractor;’; and (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘for the purposes of definitions under this paragraph’ and inserting ‘for the purposes of paragraph (2)(B), but shall be considered to be Federal funds for the purposes of paragraph (2)(A)’. (c) Validation of Proprietary Data Restrictions- (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘A challenge’ and inserting ‘Except as provided in subparagraph (C), a challenge’; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph (C): ‘(C) The limitation in this paragraph shall not apply to a case in which the Secretary finds that reasonable grounds exist to believe that a contractor or subcontractor has erroneously asserted a use or release restriction with regard to technical data described in section 2320(a)(2)(A) of this title.’. Paragraph (3) of ‘(3) Paragraph (1)(B) and paragraph (2) of this subsection shall not be in effect after September 30, 2016.’. Section 845 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 ( (1) in subsection (a)(2)-- (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘(including all options)’ after ‘not in excess of $100,000,000’; and (B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘(including all options)’ after ‘in excess of $100,000,000’; and (2) in subsection (e)(3)(A), by inserting ‘(including all options)’ after ‘does not exceed $50,000,000’. (a) Permanent Authority- (1) by striking subsections (j) and (k); and (2) by redesignating subsection (l) as subsection (j). (b) Pilot Program- ‘(k) Pilot Program for Programs Other Than Major Defense Acquisition Programs- ‘(1) IN GENERAL- The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall carry out a pilot program to expand the use of the authority provided in this section to provide opportunities for the introduction of innovative and cost-saving approaches to programs other than major defense acquisition programs through the submission, review, and implementation, where appropriate, of qualifying proposals. ‘(2) QUALIFYING PROPOSALS- For purposes of this subsection, a qualifying proposal is an offer to supply a nondevelopmental item that-- ‘(A) is evaluated as achieving a level of performance that is at least equal to the level of performance of an item being procured under a covered acquisition program and as providing savings in excess of 15 percent after considering all costs to the Government of implementing such proposal; or ‘(B) is evaluated as achieving a level of performance that is significantly better than the level of performance of an item being procured under a covered acquisition program without any increase in cost to the Government. ‘(3) REVIEW PROCEDURES- The Under Secretary shall adopt modifications as may be needed to the procedures applicable to the Challenge Program to provide for Department of Defense review of, and action on, qualifying proposals. Such procedures shall include, at a minimum, the issuance of a broad agency announcement inviting interested parties to submit qualifying proposals in areas of interest to the Department. ‘(4) DEFINITIONS- In this subsection: ‘(A) NONDEVELOPMENTAL ITEM- The term ‘nondevelopmental item’ has the meaning given that term in section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act ( ‘(B) COVERED ACQUISITION PROGRAM- The term ‘covered acquisition program’ means any acquisition program of the Department of Defense other than a major defense acquisition program, but does not include any contract awarded under an exception to competitive acquisition authorized by the Small Business Act ( ‘(C) LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE- The term ‘level of performance’, with respect to a nondevelopmental item, means the extent to which the item demonstrates required item functional characteristics. ‘(5) SUNSET- The authority to carry out the pilot program under this subsection shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act.’. (a) Competition Requirements for Task or Delivery Orders Under Energy Savings Performance Contracts- Section 801 of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act ( ‘(c) Task or Delivery Orders- (1) The head of a Federal agency may issue a task or delivery order under an energy savings performance contract by-- ‘(A) notifying all contractors that have received an award under such contract that the agency proposes to discuss energy savings performance services for some or all of its facilities and, following a reasonable period of time to provide a proposal in response to the notice, soliciting from such contractors the submission of expressions of interest in, and contractor qualifications for, performing site surveys or investigations and feasibility designs and studies, and including in the notice summary information concerning energy use for any facilities that the agency has specific interest in including in such task or delivery order; ‘(B) reviewing all expressions of interest and qualifications submitted pursuant to the notice under subparagraph (A); ‘(C) selecting two or more contractors (from among those reviewed under subparagraph (B)) to conduct discussions concerning the contractors’ respective qualifications to implement potential energy conservation measures, including-- ‘(i) requesting references and specific detailed examples with respect to similar efforts and the resulting energy savings of such similar efforts; and ‘(ii) requesting an explanation of how such similar efforts relate to the scope and content of the task or delivery order concerned; ‘(D) selecting and authorizing-- ‘(i) more than one contractor (from among those selected under subparagraph (C)) to conduct site surveys, investigations, feasibility designs and studies, or similar assessments for the energy savings performance contract services (or for discrete portions of such services), for the purpose of allowing each such contractor to submit a firm, fixed-price proposal to implement specific energy conservation measures; or ‘(ii) one contractor (from among those selected under subparagraph (C)) to conduct a site survey, investigation, feasibility design and study, or similar assessment for the purpose of allowing the contractor to submit a firm, fixed-price proposal to implement specific energy conservation measures; ‘(E) providing a debriefing to any contractor not selected under subparagraph (D); ‘(F) negotiating a task or delivery order for energy savings performance contracting services with the contractor or contractors selected under subparagraph (D) based on the energy conservation measures identified; and ‘(G) issuing a task or delivery order for energy savings performance contracting services to such contractor or contractors. ‘(2) The issuance of a task or delivery order for energy savings performance contracting services pursuant to paragraph (1) is deemed to satisfy the task and delivery order competition requirements in ‘(3) The Secretary may issue guidance as necessary to agencies issuing task or delivery orders pursuant to paragraph (1).’. (b) Effective Date- The amendment made by subsection (a) is inapplicable to task or delivery orders issued before the date of enactment of this Act. (a) Definitions- ‘(e) Definitions- In this section: ‘(1) The term ‘materials critical to national security’ means materials-- ‘(A) upon which the production or sustainment of military equipment is dependent; and ‘(B) the supply of which could be restricted by actions or events outside the control of the Government of the United States. ‘(2) The term ‘military equipment’ means equipment used directly by the armed forces to carry out military operations. ‘(3) The term ‘secure supply’, with respect to a material, means the availability of a source or sources for the material, including the full supply chain for the material and components containing the material.’. (b) Amendment Relating to Duties- Subsection (b) of section 187 of such title is amended to read as follows: ‘(b) Duties- In addition to other matters assigned to it by the Secretary of Defense, the Board shall-- ‘(1) determine the need to provide a long term secure supply of materials designated as critical to national security to ensure that national defense needs are met; ‘(2) analyze the risk associated with each material designated as critical to national security and the effect on national defense that the nonavailability of such material would have; ‘(3) recommend a strategy to the President to ensure a secure supply of materials designated as critical to national security; ‘(4) recommend such other strategies to the President as the Board considers appropriate to strengthen the industrial base with respect to materials critical to national security; and ‘(5) publish not less frequently than once every two years in the Federal Register recommendations regarding materials critical to national security, including a list of specialty metals, if any, recommended for addition to, or removal from, the definition of ‘specialty metal’ for purposes of section 2533b of this title.’. Subtitle D--Contractor Matters (a) Enhancement of Oversight and Accountability- Section 862 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (1) in subsection (b)(2)-- (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘comply with regulations’ and inserting ‘ensure that the contractor and all employees of the contractor or any subcontractor who are responsible for performing private security functions under such contract comply with regulations’; (B) in subparagraph (B)-- (i) by striking ‘comply with’ and all that follows through ‘in accordance with’ and inserting ‘ensure that the contractor and all employees of the contractor or any subcontractor who are responsible for performing private security functions under such contract comply with’; and (ii) by striking ‘and’ at the end; (C) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end and inserting ‘; and’; and (D) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: ‘(D) ensure that the contract clause is included in subcontracts awarded to any subcontractor at any tier who is responsible for performing private security functions under the contract.’; (2) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (f) and (g), respectively; and (3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsections: ‘(c) Oversight- It shall be the responsibility of the head of the contracting activity responsible for each covered contract to ensure that the contracting activity takes appropriate steps to assign sufficient oversight personnel to the contract to-- ‘(1) ensure that the contractor responsible for performing private security functions under such contract comply with the regulatory requirements prescribed pursuant to subsection (a) and the contract requirements established pursuant to subsection (b); and ‘(2) make the determinations required by subsection (d). ‘(d) Remedies- The failure of a contractor under a covered contract to comply with the requirements of the regulations prescribed under subsection (a) or the contract clause inserted in a covered contract pursuant to subsection (b), as determined by the contracting officer for the covered contract-- ‘(1) shall be included in appropriate databases of past performance and considered in any responsibility determination or evaluation of the past performance of the contractor for the purpose of a contract award decision, as provided in section 6(j) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act ( ‘(2) in the case of an award fee contract-- ‘(A) shall be considered in any evaluation of contract performance by the contractor for the relevant award fee period; and ‘(B) may be a basis for reducing or denying award fees for such period, or for recovering all or part of award fees previously paid for such period; and ‘(3) in the case of a failure to comply that is severe, prolonged, or repeated-- ‘(A) shall be referred to the suspension or debarment official for the appropriate agency; and ‘(B) may be a basis for suspension or debarment of the contractor. ‘(e) Rule of Construction- The duty of a contractor under a covered contract to comply with the requirements of the regulations prescribed under subsection (a) and the contract clause inserted into a covered contract pursuant to subsection (b), and the availability of the remedies provided in subsection (d), shall not be reduced or diminished by the failure of a higher or lower tier contractor under such contract to comply with such requirements, or by a failure of the contracting activity to provide the oversight required by subsection (c).’. (b) Revised Regulations and Contract Clause- (2) COMMENCEMENT OF APPLICABILITY OF REVISIONS- The revision of regulations under paragraph (1) shall apply to the following: (A) Any contract that is awarded on or after the date that is 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (B) Any task or delivery order that is issued on or after the date that is 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act pursuant to a contract that is awarded before, on, or after the date that is 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (3) COMMENCEMENT OF INCLUSION OF CONTRACT CLAUSE- A contract clause that reflects the revision of regulations required by the amendments made by subsection (a) shall be inserted, as required by such section 862, into the following: (A) Any contract described in paragraph (2)(A). (B) Any task or delivery order described in paragraph (2)(B). (a) Areas of Other Significant Military Operations- Section 862 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (1) by striking ‘combat operations’ each place it appears and inserting ‘combat operations or other significant military operations’; and (2) in subsection (f), as redesignated by such section 831-- (A) by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) as paragraphs (3), (4), and (5), respectively; (B) in paragraph (1)-- (i) by inserting ‘either’ after ‘constituting’; and (ii) by adding at the end the following: ‘In making designations under this paragraph, the Secretary shall ensure that an area is not designated in whole or part as both an area of combat operations and an area of other significant military operations.’; and (C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): ‘(2) OTHER SIGNIFICANT MILITARY OPERATIONS- For purposes of this section, the term ‘other significant military operations’ means activities, other than combat operations, as part of an overseas contingency operation that are carried out by United States Armed Forces in an uncontrolled or unpredictable high-threat environment where personnel performing security functions may be called upon to use deadly force.’. (b) Additional Areas Considered for Designation- (1) DETERMINATION REQUIRED FOR CERTAIN AREAS- Not later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall make a written determination for each of the following areas regarding whether or not the area constitutes an area of combat operations or an area of other significant military operations for purposes of designation as such an area under section 862 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (A) The Horn of Africa region. (B) Yemen. (C) The Philippines. (2) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a copy of each written determination under paragraph (1), together with an explanation of the basis for such determination. (c) Limitation and Exception- Section 862 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (1) by redesignating subsection (g), as redesignated by such section 831, as subsection (h) and inserting after subsection (f) the following new subsection (g): (2) in subsection (h), as so redesignated-- (A) by striking the subsection designation and ‘Exception- ’ and inserting the following: ‘(h) Exceptions- ‘(1) INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES- ’; and (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(2) NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS- The requirements of this section shall not apply to a nonprofit nongovernmental organization receiving grants or cooperative agreements for activities conducted within an area of other significant military operations if the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State agree that such organization may be exempted. An exemption may be granted by the agreement of the Secretaries under this paragraph on an organization-by-organization or area-by-area basis. Such an exemption may not be granted with respect to an area of combat operations.’. (d) Report on Implementation- Not later than 180 days after a designation of an area as an area of combat operations or an area of other significant military operations pursuant to subsection (b)(2), the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to Congress a report on steps taken or planned to be taken to implement the regulations prescribed under section 862 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (a) Review of Third-Party Standards and Certification Processes- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall-- (1) determine whether the private sector has developed-- (A) operational and business practice standards applicable to private security contractors; and (B) third-party certification processes for determining whether private security contractors adhere to standards described in subparagraph (A); and (2) review any standards and processes identified pursuant to paragraph (1) to determine whether the application of such standards and processes will make a substantial contribution to the successful performance of private security functions in areas of combat operations or other significant military operations. (b) Revised Regulations- Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise the regulations promulgated under section 862 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (1) establish criteria for defining standard practices for the performance of private security functions, which shall reflect input from industry representatives as well as the Inspector General of the Department of Defense; and (2) establish criteria for weapons training programs for contractors performing private security functions, including minimum requirements for weapons training programs of instruction and minimum qualifications for instructors for such programs. (c) Inclusion of Third-Party Standards and Certifications in Revised Regulations- (1) STANDARDS- If the Secretary determines that the application of operational and business practice standards identified pursuant to subsection (a)(1)(A) will make a substantial contribution to the successful performance of private security functions in areas of combat operations or other significant military operations, the revised regulations promulgated pursuant to subsection (b) shall incorporate a requirement to comply with such standards, subject to such exceptions as the Secretary may determine to be necessary. (2) CERTIFICATIONS- If the Secretary determines that the application of a third-party certification process identified pursuant to subsection (a)(1)(B) will make a substantial contribution to the successful performance of private security functions in areas of combat operations or other significant military operations, the revised regulations promulgated pursuant to subsection (b) may provide for the consideration of such certifications as a factor in the evaluation of proposals for award of a covered contract for the provision of private security functions, subject to such exceptions as the Secretary may determine to be necessary. (d) Definitions- In this section: (1) COVERED CONTRACT- The term ‘covered contract’ means-- (A) a contract of the Department of Defense for the performance of services; (B) a subcontract at any tier under such a contract; or (C) a task order or delivery order issued under such a contract or subcontract. (2) CONTRACTOR- The term ‘contractor’ means, with respect to a covered contract, the contractor or subcontractor carrying out the covered contract. (3) PRIVATE SECURITY FUNCTIONS- The term ‘private security functions’ means activities engaged in by a contractor under a covered contract as follows: (A) Guarding of personnel, facilities, or property of a Federal agency, the contractor or subcontractor, or a third party. (B) Any other activity for which personnel are required to carry weapons in the performance of their duties. (e) Exception- The requirements of this section shall not apply to contracts entered into by elements of the intelligence community in support of intelligence activities. (a) Expansion of Dispositions Subject to Authority- Section 823 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (1) in subsection (c), by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(5) In an administrative proceeding, a final determination of contractor fault by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to subsection (d).’; (2) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and (3) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d): ‘(d) Determinations of Contractor Fault by Secretary of Defense- ‘(1) IN GENERAL- In any case described by paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall-- ‘(A) provide for an expeditious independent investigation of the causes of the serious bodily injury or death alleged to have been caused by the contractor as described in that paragraph; and ‘(B) make a final determination, pursuant to procedures established by the Secretary for purposes of this subsection, whether the contractor, in the performance of a covered contract, caused such serious bodily injury or death through gross negligence or with reckless disregard for the safety of civilian or military personnel of the Government. ‘(2) COVERED CASES- A case described in this paragraph is any case in which the Secretary has reason to believe that-- ‘(A) a contractor, in the performance of a covered contract, may have caused the serious bodily injury or death of any civilian or military personnel of the Government; and ‘(B) such contractor is not subject to the jurisdiction of United States courts. ‘(3) CONSTRUCTION OF DETERMINATION- A final determination under this subsection may be used only for the purpose of evaluating contractor performance, and shall not be determinative of fault for any other purpose.’. (b) Definition of Contractor- Paragraph (1) of subsection (e) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (a)(2) of this section, is amended to read as follows: ‘(1) The term ‘contractor’ means a company awarded a covered contract and a subcontractor at any tier under such contract.’. (c) Technical Amendment- Subsection (c) of such section is further amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking ‘subsection (a)’ and inserting ‘subsection (b)’. (d) Inclusion of Determinations of Contractor Fault in Database for Federal Agency Contract and Grant Officers and Suspension and Debarment Officials- Section 872(c)(1) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( ‘(E) In an administrative proceeding, a final determination of contractor fault by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 823(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (e) Effective Date- The requirements of section 823 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, as amended by subsections (a) through (c), shall apply with respect to the following: (1) Any contract entered into on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) Any task order or delivery order issued on or after the date of the enactment of this Act under a contract entered into before, on, or after that date. Section 863 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( ‘(a) Joint Report Required- ‘(1) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in paragraph (6), every 12 months, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development shall submit to the relevant committees of Congress a joint report on contracts in Iraq or Afghanistan. ‘(2) PRIMARY MATTERS COVERED- A report under this subsection shall, at a minimum, cover the following with respect to contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan during the reporting period: ‘(A) Total number of contracts awarded. ‘(B) Total number of active contracts. ‘(C) Total value of all contracts awarded. ‘(D) Total value of active contracts. ‘(E) The extent to which such contracts have used competitive procedures. ‘(G) Total number of contractor personnel who are performing security functions at the end of each quarter of the reporting period. ‘(H) Total number of contractor personnel killed or wounded. ‘(3) ADDITIONAL MATTERS COVERED- A report under this subsection shall also cover the following: ‘(A) The sources of information and data used to compile the information required under paragraph (2). ‘(B) A description of any known limitations of the data reported under paragraph (2), including known limitations of the methodology and data sources used to compile the report. ‘(C) Any plans for strengthening collection, coordination, and sharing of information on contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan through improvements to the common databases identified under section 861(b)(4). ‘(4) REPORTING PERIOD- A report under this subsection shall cover a period of not less than 12 months. ‘(5) SUBMISSION OF REPORTS- The Secretaries and the Administrator shall submit an initial report under this subsection not later than February 1, 2011, and shall submit an updated report by February 1 of every year thereafter until February 1, 2013. ‘(6) EXCEPTION- If the total annual amount of obligations for contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan combined is less than $250,000,000 for the reporting period, for all three agencies combined, the Secretaries and the Administrator may submit, in lieu of a report, a letter stating the applicability of this paragraph, with such documentation as the Secretaries and the Administrator consider appropriate. ‘(7) ESTIMATES- In determining the total number of contractor personnel working on contracts under paragraph (2)(F), the Secretaries and the Administrator may use estimates for any category of contractor personnel for which they determine it is not feasible to provide an actual count. The report shall fully disclose the extent to which estimates are used in lieu of an actual count. ‘(b) Comptroller General Review and Report- ‘(1) IN GENERAL- Within 180 days after submission of each annual joint report required under subsection (a), but in no case later than August 5 of each year until 2013, the Comptroller General of the United States shall review the joint report and submit to the relevant committees of Congress a report on such review. ‘(2) MATTERS COVERED- A report under this subsection shall, at minimum-- ‘(A) assess the data and data sources used in developing the joint report; ‘(B) review how the Department of Defense, the Department of State, and the United States Agency for International Development are using the data and the data sources used to develop the joint report in managing, overseeing, and coordinating contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan; ‘(C) assess the plans of the departments and agency for strengthening or improving the common databases identified under section 861(b)(4); and ‘(D) review and make recommendations on any specific contract or class of contracts that the Comptroller General determines raises issues of significant concern. ‘(3) ACCESS TO DATABASES AND OTHER INFORMATION- The Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development shall provide to the Comptroller General full access to information on contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan for the purposes of the review carried out under this subsection, including the common databases identified under section 861(b)(4).’. Subtitle E--Other Matters (a) Vice Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff To Be Chairman of Council- Subsection (c) of (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘Vice’ before ‘Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff’; (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘, other than the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,’ and inserting ‘under subparagraphs (B), (C), (D), and (E) of paragraph (1)’; and (3) by striking paragraph (3). (b) Role of Commanders of Combatant Commands as Members of Council- Paragraph (1) of subsection (c) of such section is further amended-- (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘and’ at the end; (2) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period at the end and inserting ‘; and’; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: ‘(F) in addition, when directed by the chairman, the commander of any combatant command (or, as directed by that commander, the deputy commander of that command) when matters related to the area of responsibility or functions of that command will be under consideration by the Council.’. (c) Civilian Advisors- (1) ADDITIONAL CIVILIAN ADVISORS- Subsection (d) of such section is amended by striking ‘The Under Secretary’ and all that follows through ‘and expertise.’ and inserting: ‘The following officials of the Department of Defense shall serve as advisors to the Council on matters within their authority and expertise: ‘(A) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. ‘(B) The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller). ‘(C) The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. ‘(D) The Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. ‘(E) The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. ‘(F) Such other civilian officials of the Department of Defense as are designated by the Secretary of Defense for purposes of this subsection.’. (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT- Subsection (b)(3) of such section is amended by striking ‘Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, and the Director of Cost Assessment and Performance Evaluation’ and inserting ‘advisors to the Council under subsection (d)’. (d) Recognition of Permanent Nature of Council- Subsection (a) of such section is amended by striking ‘The Secretary of Defense shall establish’ and inserting ‘There is’. (a) Finding- Congress finds the following: (1) Executive Order No. 13514, dated October 5, 2009, requires the departments and agencies of the Federal Government to establish an integrated strategy towards the procurement of sustainable products and services. (2) The Department of Defense Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan, issued in August 2010, provides a framework for the Department’s compliance with Executive Order No. 13514 and other applicable sustainability requirements. (b) Report- (1) IN GENERAL- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of the achievement by the Department of Defense of the objectives and goals on the procurement of sustainable products and services established by section 2(h) of Executive Order No. 13514. (2) ELEMENTS- The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A description of the actions taken, and to be taken, by the Department to identify particular sustainable products and services that contribute to the achievement of the objectives and goals described in paragraph (1). (B) An assessment of the tools available to the Department to promote the use of particular sustainable products and services identified pursuant to the actions described in subparagraph (A) across the Department, and a description of the actions taken, and to be taken, by the Department to use such tools. (C) A description of strategies and tools identified by the Department that could assist the other departments and agencies of the Federal Government in procuring sustainable products and services, including a description of mechanisms for sharing best practices in such procurement, as identified by the Department, among the other departments and agencies of the Federal Government. (D) An assessment of the progress the Department has made toward the achievement of the objectives and goals described in paragraph (1), including the scorecard identified in its Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan. (a) Assessment Required- (1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary of Defense shall undertake an assessment of the supply and demand for rare earth materials in defense applications and identify which, if any, rare earth material meets both of the following criteria: (A) The rare earth material is critical to the production, sustainment, or operation of significant United States military equipment. (B) The rare earth material is subject to interruption of supply, based on actions or events outside the control of the Government of the United States. (2) EVALUATION OF SUPPLY- The assessment shall include a comprehensive evaluation of the long-term security and availability of all aspects of the supply chain for rare earth materials in defense applications, particularly the location and number of sources at each step of the supply chain, including-- (A) mining of rare earth ores; (B) separation of rare earth oxides; (C) refining and reduction of rare earth metals; (D) creation of rare earth alloys; (E) manufacturing of components and systems containing rare earth materials; and (F) recycling of components and systems to reclaim and reuse rare earth materials. (3) EVALUATION OF DEMAND- The assessment shall include a comprehensive evaluation of the demand for and usage of rare earth materials in all defense applications, including-- (A) approximations of the total amounts of individual rare earth materials used in defense applications; (B) determinations of which, if any, defense applications are dependent upon rare earth materials for proper operation and functioning; and (C) assessments of the feasibility of alternatives to usage of rare earth materials in defense applications. (4) OTHER STUDIES AND AGENCIES- Any applicable studies conducted by the Department of Defense, the Comptroller General of the United States, or other Federal agencies during fiscal year 2010 may be considered as partial fulfillment of the requirements of this section. The Secretary may consider the views of other Federal agencies, as appropriate. (5) SPECIFIC MATERIAL INCLUDED- At a minimum, the Secretary shall identify sintered neodymium iron boron magnets as meeting the criteria specified in paragraph (1). (b) Plan- For each rare earth material identified pursuant to subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall develop a plan to ensure the long-term availability of such rare earth material, with a goal of establishing an assured source of supply of such material in critical defense applications by December 31, 2015. In developing the plan, the Secretary shall consider all aspects of the material’s supply chain, as described in subsection (a)(2). The plan shall include consideration of numerous risk mitigation methods with respect to the material, including-- (1) an assessment of including the material in the National Defense Stockpile; (2) in consultation with the United States Trade Representative, the identification of any trade practices known to the Secretary that limit the Secretary’s ability to ensure the long-term availability of such material or the ability to meet the goal of establishing an assured source of supply of such material by December 31, 2015; (3) an assessment of the availability of financing to industry, academic institutions, or not-for-profit entities to provide the capacity required to ensure the availability of the material, as well as potential mechanisms to increase the availability of such financing; (4) an assessment of the benefits, if any, of Defense Production Act funding to support the establishment of an assured source of supply for military components; (5) an assessment of funding for research and development related to any aspect of the rare earth material supply chain or research on alternatives and substitutes; (6) any other risk mitigation method determined appropriate by the Secretary that is consistent with the goal of establishing an assured source of supply by December 31, 2015; and (7) for steps of the rare earth material supply chain for which no other risk mitigation method, as described in paragraphs (1) through (6), will ensure an assured source of supply by December 31, 2015, a specific plan to eliminate supply chain vulnerability by the earliest date practicable. (c) Report- (1) REQUIREMENT- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional committees described in paragraph (2) a report containing the findings of the assessment required under subsection (a) and the plan developed under subsection (b). (2) CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES- The congressional committees described in this paragraph are as follows: (A) The congressional defense committees. (B) The Committee on Science and Technology, the Committee on Financial Services, and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives. (C) The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, the Committee on Finance, and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate. (a) Review Required- The Comptroller General of the United States shall review the use of the national security exception to full and open competition provided in (b) Matters Reviewed- The review of the use of the national security exception required by subsection (a) shall include-- (1) the pattern of usage of such exception by acquisition organizations within the Department to determine which organizations are commonly using the exception and the frequency of such usage; (2) the range of items or services being acquired through the use of such exception; (3) the process for reviewing and approving justifications involving such exception; (4) whether the justifications for use of such exception typically meet the relevant requirements of the Federal Acquisition Regulation applicable to the use of such exception; (5) issues associated with follow-on procurements for items or services acquired using such exception; and (6) potential additional instances where such exception could be applied and any authorities available to the Department other than such exception that could be applied in such instances. (c) Report- Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the review required by subsection (a), including a discussion of each of the matters specified in subsection (b). The report shall include any recommendations relating to the matters reviewed that the Secretary considers appropriate. The report shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex. (a) Requirement- The Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan to ensure that covered entities employ and maintain policies and procedures that meet requirements under the national industrial security program. In developing the plan, the Secretary shall consider whether or not covered entities, or any category of covered entities, should be required to establish government security committees similar to those required for companies that are subject to foreign ownership control or influence mitigation measures. (b) Covered Entity- A covered entity under this section is an entity-- (1) to which the Department of Defense has granted a facility clearance; and (2) that is not subject to foreign ownership control or influence mitigation measures. (c) Guidance- The Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance, including appropriate compliance mechanisms, to implement the requirement in subsection (a). To the extent determined appropriate by the Secretary, the guidance shall require covered entities, or any category of covered entities, to establish government security committees similar to those required for companies that are subject to foreign ownership control or influence mitigation measures. (d) Report- Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the plan developed pursuant to subsection (a) and the guidance issued pursuant to subsection (c). The report shall specifically address the rationale for the Secretary’s decision on whether or not to require covered entities, or any category of covered entities, to establish government security committees similar to those required for companies that are subject to foreign ownership control or influence mitigation measures. (a) Contract Requirement- The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each contract described in subsection (b) awarded by the Department of Defense includes a provision requiring the photovoltaic devices provided under the contract to comply with the Buy American Act ( (b) Contracts Described- The contracts described in this subsection include energy savings performance contracts, utility service contracts, land leases, and private housing contracts, to the extent that such contracts result in ownership of photovoltaic devices by the Department of Defense. For the purposes of this section, the Department of Defense is deemed to own a photovoltaic device if the device is-- (1) installed on Department of Defense property or in a facility owned by the Department of Defense; and (2) reserved for the exclusive use of the Department of Defense for the full economic life of the device. (c) Definition of Photovoltaic Devices- In this section, the term ‘photovoltaic devices’ means devices that convert light directly into electricity through a solid-state, semiconductor process. (a) Defense Science Board Review of Organization, Training, and Planning- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall direct the Defense Science Board to carry out a review of Department of Defense organization, doctrine, training, and planning for contractor logistics support of contingency operations. (b) Matters To Be Addressed- (1) IN GENERAL- The matters addressed by the review required by subsection(a) shall include, at a minimum, the following: (A) Department of Defense policies and procedures for planning for contractor logistics support of contingency operations. (B) Department organization and staffing for the implementation of such policies and procedures. (C) The development of Department doctrine for contractor logistics support of contingency operations. (D) The training of Department military and civilian personnel for the planning, management, and oversight of contractor logistics support of contingency operations. (E) The extent to which the Department should rely upon contractor logistics support in future contingency operations, and the risks associated with reliance on such support. (F) Any logistics support functions for contingency operations for which the Department should establish or retain an organic capability. (G) The scope and level of detail on contractor logistics support of contingency operations that is currently included in operational plans, and that should be included in operational plans. (H) Contracting mechanisms and contract vehicles that are currently used, and should be used, to provide contractor logistics support of contingency operations. (I) Department organization and staffing for the management and oversight of contractor logistics support of contingency operations. (J) Actions that could be taken to improve Department management and oversight of contractors providing logistics support of contingency operations. (K) The extent to which logistics support of contingency operations has been, and should be, provided by subcontractors, and the advantages and disadvantages of reliance upon subcontractors for that purpose. (L) The extent to which logistics support of contingency operations has been, and should be, provided by local nationals and third country nationals, and the advantages and disadvantages of reliance upon such sources for that purpose. (2) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS- The review required by subsection (a) shall include findings and recommendations related to-- (A) legislative or policy guidance to address the matters listed in paragraph (1); and (B) whether and to what extent the quadrennial defense review (conducted pursuant to Subtitle F--Improve Acquisition Act This subtitle may be cited as the ‘Improve Acquisition Act of 2010’. (a) Management of the Defense Acquisition System- Part IV of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after chapter 148 the following new chapter: ‘Sec. ‘2545. Definitions. ‘2546. Civilian management of the defense acquisition system. ‘2547. Acquisition-related functions of chiefs of the armed forces. ‘2548. Performance assessments of the defense acquisition system. ‘In this chapter: ‘(1) The term ‘acquisition’ has the meaning provided in section 4(16) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act ( ‘(2) The term ‘defense acquisition system’ means the workforce engaged in carrying out the acquisition of property and services for the Department of Defense; the management structure responsible for directing and overseeing the acquisition of property and services for the Department of Defense; and the statutory, regulatory, and policy framework that guides the acquisition of property and services for the Department of Defense. ‘(3) The term ‘element of the defense acquisition system’ means an organization that employs members of the acquisition workforce, carries out acquisition functions, and focuses primarily on acquisition. ‘(4) The term ‘acquisition workforce’ has the meaning provided in section 101(a)(18) of this title. ‘(a) Responsibility of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics- Subject to the authority, direction and control of the Secretary of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall be responsible for the management of the defense acquisition system and shall exercise such control of the system and perform such duties as are necessary to ensure the successful and efficient operation of the defense acquisition system, including the duties enumerated and assigned to the Under Secretary elsewhere in this title. ‘(b) Responsibility of the Service Acquisition Executives- Subject to the direction of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics on matters pertaining to acquisition, and subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of the military department concerned, a service acquisition executive of a military department shall be responsible for the management of elements of the defense acquisition system in that military department and shall exercise such control of the system and perform such duties as are necessary to ensure the successful and efficient operation of such elements of the defense acquisition system. ‘(a) Performance of Certain Acquisition-related Functions- The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Chief of Staff of the Army, the Chief of Naval Operations, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps assist the Secretary of the military department concerned in the performance of the following acquisition-related functions of such department: ‘(1) The development of requirements relating to the defense acquisition system (subject, where appropriate, to validation by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council pursuant to section 181 of this title). ‘(2) The coordination of measures to control requirements creep in the defense acquisition system. ‘(3) The development of career paths in acquisition for military personnel (as required by section 1722a of this title). ‘(4) The assignment and training of contracting officer representatives when such representatives are required to be members of the armed forces because of the nature of the contract concerned. ‘(b) Rule of Construction- Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the assignment of functions under section 3014(c)(1)(A), section 5014(c)(1)(A), or section 8014(c)(1)(A) of this title, except as explicitly provided in this section. ‘(c) Definitions- In this section: ‘(1) The term ‘requirements creep’ means the addition of new technical or operational specifications after a requirements document is approved by the appropriate validation authority for the requirements document. ‘(2) The term ‘requirements document’ means a document produced in the requirements process that is provided for an acquisition program to guide the subsequent development, production, and testing of the program and that-- ‘(A) justifies the need for a materiel approach, or an approach that is a combination of materiel and non-materiel, to satisfy one or more specific capability gaps; ‘(B) details the information necessary to develop an increment of militarily useful, logistically supportable, and technically mature capability, including key performance parameters; or ‘(C) identifies production attributes required for a single increment of a program. ‘(a) Performance Assessments Required- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the Director of Procurement and Acquisition Policy, and the Director of the Office of Performance Assessment and Root Cause Analysis, shall issue guidance, with detailed implementation instructions, for the Department of Defense to provide for periodic independent performance assessments of elements of the defense acquisition system for the purpose of-- ‘(1) determining the extent to which such elements of the defense acquisition system deliver value to the Department of Defense, taking into consideration the performance elements identified in subsection (b); ‘(2) assisting senior officials of the Department of Defense in identifying and developing lessons learned from best practices and shortcomings in the performance of such elements of the defense acquisition system; and ‘(3) assisting senior officials of the Department of Defense in developing acquisition workforce excellence under section 1701a of this title ‘(b) Areas Considered in Performance Assessments- (1) Each performance assessment conducted pursuant to subsection (a) shall consider, at a minimum-- ‘(A) the extent to which acquisitions conducted by the element of the defense acquisition system under review meet applicable cost, schedule, and performance objectives; and ‘(B) the staffing and quality of the acquisition workforce and the effectiveness of the management of the acquisition workforce, including workforce incentives and career paths. ‘(2) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the performance assessments required by this section are appropriately tailored to reflect the diverse nature of the work performed by each element of the defense acquisition system. In addition to the mandatory areas under paragraph (1), a performance assessment may consider, as appropriate, specific areas of acquisition concern, such as-- ‘(A) the selection of contractors, including-- ‘(i) the extent of competition and the use of exceptions to competition requirements; ‘(ii) compliance with Department of Defense policies regarding the participation of small business concerns and various categories of small business concerns, including the use of contract bundling and the availability of non-bundled contract vehicles; ‘(iii) the quality of market research; ‘(iv) the effective consideration of contractor past performance; and ‘(B) the negotiation of contracts, including-- ‘(i) the appropriate application of section 2306a of this title (relating to truth in negotiations); ‘(ii) the appropriate use of contract types appropriate to specific procurements; ‘(iii) the appropriate use of performance requirements; ‘(iv) the appropriate acquisition of technical data and other rights and assets necessary to support long-term sustainment and follow-on procurement; and ‘(v) the timely definitization of any undefinitized contract actions; and ‘(C) the management of contractor performance, including-- ‘(i) the assignment of appropriately qualified contracting officer representatives and other contract management personnel; ‘(ii) the extent of contract disputes, the reasons for such disputes, and the extent to which they have been successfully addressed; ‘(iii) the appropriate consideration of long-term sustainment and energy efficiency objectives; and ‘(iv) the appropriate use of integrated testing. ‘(c) Contents of Guidance- The guidance issued pursuant to subsection (a) shall ensure that each element of the defense acquisition system is subject to a performance assessment under this section not less often than once every four years, and shall address, at a minimum-- ‘(1) the designation of elements of the defense acquisition system that are subject to performance assessment at an organizational level that ensures such assessments can be performed in an efficient and integrated manner; ‘(2) the frequency with which such performance assessments should be conducted; ‘(3) goals, standards, tools, and metrics for use in conducting performance assessments; ‘(4) the composition of the teams designated to perform performance assessments; ‘(5) any phase-in requirements needed to ensure that qualified staff are available to perform performance assessments; ‘(6) procedures for tracking the implementation of recommendations made pursuant to performance assessments; ‘(7) procedures for developing and disseminating lessons learned from performance assessments; and ‘(8) procedures for ensuring that information from performance assessments are retained electronically and are provided in a timely manner to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Director of the Office of Performance Assessment and Root Cause Analysis as needed to assist them in performing their responsibilities under this section. ‘(d) Performance Goals Under Government Performance Results Act of 1993- Beginning with fiscal year 2012, the annual performance plan prepared by the Department of Defense pursuant to section 1115 of title 31 shall include appropriate performance goals for elements of the defense acquisition system. ‘(e) Reporting Requirements- Beginning with fiscal year 2012-- ‘(1) the annual report prepared by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to ‘(2) the annual report prepared by the Director of the Office of Performance Assessment and Root Cause Analysis pursuant to section 103(f) of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 ( (b) Clerical Amendments- The table of chapters at the beginning of subtitle A of title 10, United States Code, and at the beginning of part IV of such subtitle, are each amended by inserting after the item relating to chapter 148 the following new item: 2545’. (a) Report Required- The Comptroller General of the United States shall carry out a comprehensive review of the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (in this section referred to as ‘JCIDS’). Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review and include in such report any recommendations the Comptroller General considers necessary and advisable to improve or replace JCIDS. (b) Content of the Review- (1) PURPOSE- The purpose of the review required by subsection (a) is to evaluate the effectiveness of JCIDS in achieving the following objectives: (A) Timeliness in delivering capability to the warfighter. (B) Efficient use of the investment resources of the Department of Defense. (C) Control of requirements creep. (D) Responsiveness to changes occurring after the approval of a requirements document (including changes to the threat environment, the emergence of new capabilities, or changes in the resources estimated to procure or sustain a capability). (E) Development of the personnel skills, capacity, and training needed for an effective and efficient requirements process. (2) MATTERS CONSIDERED- In performing the review, the Comptroller General shall gather information on and consider the following matters: (A) The time that requirements documents take to receive approval through JCIDS. (B) The quality of cost information considered in JCIDS and the extent of its consideration. (C) The extent to which JCIDS establishes a meaningful level of priority for requirements. (D) The extent to which JCIDS is considering trade-offs between cost, schedule, and performance objectives. (E) The quality of information on sustainment considered in JCIDS and the extent to which sustainment information is considered. (F) An evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of designating a commander of a unified combatant command for each requirements document for which the Joint Requirements Oversight Council is the validation authority to provide a joint evaluation task force to participate in a materiel solution and to-- (i) provide input to the analysis of alternatives; (ii) participate in testing (including limited user tests and prototype testing); (iii) provide input on a concept of operations and doctrine; (iv) provide end user feedback to the resource sponsor; and (v) participate, through the combatant commander concerned, in any alteration of the requirement for such solution. (c) Definitions- In this section: (1) JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM- The term ‘Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System’ means the system for the assessment, review, validation, and approval of joint warfighting requirements that is described in Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 3170.01G (2) REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT- The term ‘requirements document’ means a document produced in JCIDS that is provided for an acquisition program to guide the subsequent development, production, and testing of the program and that-- (A) justifies the need for a materiel approach, or an approach that is a combination of materiel and non-materiel, to satisfy one or more specific capability gaps; (B) details the information necessary to develop an increment of militarily useful, logistically supportable, and technically mature capability, including key performance parameters; or (C) identifies production attributes required for a single increment of a program. (3) REQUIREMENTS CREEP- The term ‘requirements creep’ means the addition of new technical or operational specifications after a requirements document is approved. (4) MATERIEL SOLUTION- The term ‘materiel solution’ means the development, acquisition, procurement, or fielding of a new item, or of a modification to an existing item, necessary to equip, operate, maintain, and support military activities. (a) Establishment of Requirements Processes for the Acquisition of Services- The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the military departments and Defense Agencies each establish a process for identifying, assessing, reviewing, and validating requirements for the acquisition of services. (b) Operational Requirements- With regard to requirements for the acquisition of services in support of combatant commands and military operations, the Secretary shall ensure-- (1) that the Chief of Staff of the Army, the Chief of Naval Operations, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps implement and bear chief responsibility for carrying out, within the Armed Force concerned, the process established pursuant to subsection (a) for such Armed Force; and (2) that commanders of unified combatant commands and other officers identified or designated as joint qualified officers have an opportunity to participate in the process of each military department to provide input on joint requirements for the acquisition of services. (c) Supporting Requirements- With regard to requirements for the acquisition of services not covered by subsection (b), the Secretary shall ensure that the secretaries of the military departments and the heads of the Defense Agencies implement and bear chief responsibility for carrying out, within the military department or Defense Agency concerned, the process established pursuant to subsection (a) for such military department or Defense Agency. (d) Implementation Plans Required- The Secretary shall ensure that an implementation plan is developed for each process established pursuant to subsection (a) that addresses, at a minimum, the following: (1) The organization of such process. (2) The level of command responsibility required for identifying, assessing, reviewing, and validating requirements for the acquisition of services in accordance with the requirements of this section and the categories established under (3) The composition of positions necessary to operate such process. (4) The training required for personnel engaged in such process. (5) The relationship between doctrine and such process. (6) Methods of obtaining input on joint requirements for the acquisition of services. (7) Procedures for coordinating with the acquisition process. (8) Considerations relating to opportunities for strategic sourcing. (e) Matters Required in Implementation Plan- Each plan required under subsection (d) shall provide for initial implementation of a process for identifying, assessing, reviewing, and validating requirements for the acquisition of services not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act and shall provide for full implementation of such process at the earliest date practicable. (f) Consistency With Joint Guidance- Whenever, at any time, guidance is issued by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff relating to requirements for the acquisition of services in support of combatant commands and military operations, each process established pursuant to subsection (a) shall be revised in accordance with such joint guidance. (g) Definition- The term ‘requirements for the acquisition of services’ means objectives to be achieved through acquisitions primarily involving the procurement of services. (h) Review of Supporting Requirements To Identify Savings- The secretaries of the military departments and the heads of the Defense Agencies shall review and validate each requirement described in subsection (c) with an anticipated cost in excess of $10,000,000 with the objective of identifying unneeded or low priority requirements that can be reduced or eliminated, with the savings transferred to higher priority objectives. Savings identified and transferred to higher priority objectives through review and revalidation under this subsection shall count toward the savings objectives established in the June 4, 2010, guidance of the Secretary of Defense on improved operational efficiencies and the annual reduction in funding for service support contractors required by the August 16, 2010, guidance of the Secretary of Defense on efficiency initiatives. As provided by the Secretary, cost avoidance shall not count toward these objectives. (i) Extension of Authority- Subsection (e) of section 834 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 ( (a) Review of Guidance- The Secretary of Defense shall review the acquisition guidance of the Department of Defense, including, at a minimum, the guidance contained in Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02 entitled ‘Operation of the Defense Acquisition System’. (b) Matters Considered- The review performed under subsection (a) shall consider-- (1) the extent to which the acquisition of commercial goods and commodities, commercial and military unique services, and information technology should be addressed in Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02 and other guidance primarily relating to the acquisition of weapon systems, or should be addressed in separate instructions and guidance; (2) whether long-term sustainment and energy efficiency of weapon systems is appropriately emphasized; (3) whether appropriate mechanisms exist to communicate information relating to the mission needs of the Department of Defense to the industrial base in a way that allows the industrial base to make appropriate investments in infrastructure, capacity, and technology development to help meet such needs; (4) the extent to which earned value management should be required on acquisitions not involving the acquisition of weapon systems and whether measures of quality and technical performance should be included in any earned value management system; and (5) such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate. (c) Report- Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report detailing any changes in the acquisition guidance of the Department of Defense identified during the review required by subsection (a), and any actions taken, or planned to be taken, to implement such changes. (a) Review Required- The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy and the heads of such other Federal agencies as the Secretary considers appropriate, shall review the Federal Acquisition Regulation and the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement to ensure that such regulations include appropriate guidance for and references to services acquisition that are in addition to references provided in part 37 and the Defense Supplement to part 37. (b) Matters Considered- The review required by subsection (a) shall consider the extent to which additional guidance is needed-- (1) to provide the tools and processes needed to assist contracting officials in addressing the full range of complexities that can arise in the acquisition of services; and (2) to enhance and support the procurement and project management community in all aspects of the process for the acquisition of services, including requirements development, assessment of reasonableness, and post-award management and oversight. (c) Report- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing-- (1) a summary of the findings of the review required by subsection (a); and (2) any recommendations that the Secretary may have for changes to the Federal Acquisition Regulation and the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement to address such findings, including identifying any changes that are necessary to improve part 37 (which specifically addresses services acquisitions). (a) Pilot Program Authorized- (1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary of Defense may carry out a pilot program to assess the feasability and advisability of acquiring military purpose nondevelopmental items in accordance with this section. (2) SCOPE OF PROGRAM- Under the pilot program, the Secretary may enter into contracts with nontraditional defense contractors for the acquisition of military purpose nondevelopmental items in accordance with the requirements set forth in subsection (b). (b) Contract Requirements- Each contract entered into under the pilot program-- (1) shall be a firm, fixed price contract, or a firm, fixed price contract with an economic price adjustment clause awarded using competitive procedures in accordance with chapter 137 of title 10, United States Code; (2) shall be in an amount not in excess of $50,000,000, including all options; (3) shall provide-- (A) for the delivery of an initial lot of production quantities of completed items not later than nine months after the date of the award of such contract; and (B) that failure to make delivery as provided for under subparagraph (A) may result in the termination of such contract for default; and (4) shall be-- (A) exempt from the requirement to submit certified cost or pricing data under (B) subject to the requirement to provide data other than certified cost or pricing data for the purpose of price reasonableness determinations, as provided in (c) Regulations- If the Secretary establishes the pilot program authorized under subsection (a), the Secretary shall prescribe regulations governing such pilot program. Such regulations shall be included in regulations of the Department of Defense prescribed as part of the Federal Acquisition Regulation and shall include the contract clauses and procedures necessary to implement such program. (d) Reports- (A) The contractor. (B) The item or items to be acquired. (C) The military purpose to be served by such item or items. (D) The amount of the contract. (E) The actions taken by the Department of Defense to ensure that the price paid for such item or items is fair and reasonable. (2) PROGRAM ASSESSMENT- If the Secretary establishes the pilot program authorized under subsection (a), not later than four years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the assessment of the Comptroller General of the extent to which the pilot program-- (A) enabled the Department to acquire items that otherwise might not have been available to the Department; (B) assisted the Department in the rapid acquisition and fielding of capabilities needed to meet urgent operational needs; and (C) protected the interests of the United States in paying fair and reasonable prices for the item or items acquired. (e) Definitions- In this section: (1) The term ‘military purpose nondevelopmental item’ means a nondevelopmental item that meets a validated military requirement, as determined in writing by the responsible program manager, and has been developed exclusively at private expense. For purposes of this paragraph, an item shall not be considered to be developed exclusively at private expense if development of the item was paid for in whole or in part through-- (A) independent research and development costs or bid and proposal costs that have been reimbursed directly or indirectly by a Federal agency or have been submitted to a Federal agency for reimbursement; or (B) foreign government funding. (2) The term ‘nondevelopmental item’-- (A) has the meaning given that term in section 4(13) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act ( (B) also includes previously developed items of supply that require modifications other than those customarily available in the commercial marketplace if such modifications are consistent with the requirement in subsection (b)(3)(A). (3) The term ‘nontraditional defense contractor’ has the meaning given that term in (4) The terms ‘independent research and developments costs’ and ‘bid and proposal costs’ have the meaning given such terms in section 31.205-18 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation. (f) Sunset- (1) IN GENERAL- The authority to carry out the pilot program shall expire on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) CONTINUATION OF CURRENT CONTRACTS- The expiration under paragraph (1) of the authority to carry out the pilot program shall not affect the validity of any contract awarded under the pilot program before the date of the expiration of the pilot program under that paragraph. (g) Statutory Definition of Nontraditional Defense Contractor- (1) NONTRADITIONAL DEFENSE CONTRACTOR- ‘(9) The term ‘nontraditional defense contractor’, with respect to a procurement or with respect to a transaction authorized under section 2371(a) of this title, means an entity that is not currently performing and has not performed, for at least the one-year period preceding the solicitation of sources by the Department of Defense for the procurement or transaction, any of the following for the Department of Defense: ‘(A) Any contract or subcontract that is subject to full coverage under the cost accounting standards prescribed pursuant to section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act ( ‘(B) Any other contract in excess of $500,000 under which the contractor is required to submit certified cost or pricing data under section 2306a of this title.’. (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT- Section 845(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 ( ‘(f) Nontraditional Defense Contractor Defined- In this section, the term ‘nontraditional defense contractor’ has the meaning provided by (a) Acquisition Workforce Excellence- Subchapter I of chapter 87 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1701 the following new section: ‘(a) Purpose- The purpose of this chapter is to require the Department of Defense to develop and manage a highly skilled professional acquisition workforce-- ‘(1) in which excellence and contribution to mission is rewarded; ‘(2) which has the technical expertise and business skills to ensure the Department receives the best value for the expenditure of public resources; ‘(3) which serves as a model for performance management of employees of the Department; and ‘(4) which is managed in a manner that complements and reinforces the management of the defense acquisition system pursuant to chapter 149 of this title. ‘(b) Performance Management- In order to achieve the purpose set forth in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall-- ‘(1) use the full authorities provided in subsections (a) through (d) of section 9902 of title 5, including flexibilities related to performance management and hiring and to training of managers; ‘(2) require managers to develop performance plans for individual members of the acquisition workforce in order to give members an understanding of how their performance contributes to their organization’s mission and the success of the defense acquisition system (as defined in section 2545 of this title); ‘(3) to the extent appropriate, use the lessons learned from the acquisition demonstration project carried out under section 1762 of this title related to contribution-based compensation and appraisal, and how those lessons may be applied within the General Schedule system; ‘(4) develop attractive career paths; ‘(5) encourage continuing education and training; ‘(6) develop appropriate procedures for warnings during performance evaluations for members of the acquisition workforce who consistently fail to meet performance standards; ‘(7) take full advantage of the Defense Civilian Leadership Program established under section 1112 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( ‘(8) use the authorities for highly qualified experts under section 9903 of title 5, to hire experts who are skilled acquisition professionals to-- ‘(A) serve in leadership positions within the acquisition workforce to strengthen management and oversight; ‘(B) provide mentors to advise individuals within the acquisition workforce on their career paths and opportunities to advance and excel within the acquisition workforce; and ‘(C) assist with the design of education and training courses and the training of individuals in the acquisition workforce; and ‘(9) use the authorities for expedited security clearance processing pursuant to section 1564 of this title. ‘(c) Negotiations- Any action taken by the Secretary under this section, or to implement this section, shall be subject to the requirements of chapter 71 of title 5. ‘(d) Regulations- Any rules or regulations prescribed pursuant to this section shall be deemed an agency rule or regulation under section 7117(a)(2) of title 5, and shall not be deemed a Government-wide rule or regulation under section 7117(a)(1) of such title.’. (b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1701 the following new item: ‘1701a. Management for acquisition workforce excellence.’. (a) Codification Into Title 10- (1) IN GENERAL- Chapter 87 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1761 the following new section: ‘(a) Commencement- The Secretary of Defense is authorized to carry out a demonstration project, the purpose of which is to determine the feasibility or desirability of one or more proposals for improving the personnel management policies or procedures that apply with respect to the acquisition workforce of the Department of Defense and supporting personnel assigned to work directly with the acquisition workforce. ‘(b) Terms and Conditions- (1) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, any demonstration project described in subsection (a) shall be subject to section 4703 of title 5 and all other provisions of such title that apply with respect to any demonstration project under such section. ‘(2) Subject to paragraph (3), in applying section 4703 of title 5 with respect to a demonstration project described in subsection (a)-- ‘(A) ‘180 days’ in subsection (b)(4) of such section shall be deemed to read ‘120 days’; ‘(B) ‘90 days’ in subsection (b)(6) of such section shall be deemed to read ‘30 days’; and ‘(C) subsection (d)(1) of such section shall be disregarded. ‘(3) Paragraph (2) shall not apply with respect to a demonstration project unless-- ‘(A) for each organization or team participating in the demonstration project-- ‘(i) at least one-third of the workforce participating in the demonstration project consists of members of the acquisition workforce; and ‘(ii) at least two-thirds of the workforce participating in the demonstration project consists of members of the acquisition workforce and supporting personnel assigned to work directly with the acquisition workforce; and ‘(B) the demonstration project commences before October 1, 2007. ‘(c) Limitation on Number of Participants- The total number of persons who may participate in the demonstration project under this section may not exceed 120,000. ‘(d) Effect of Reorganizations- The applicability of paragraph (2) of subsection (b) to an organization or team shall not terminate by reason that the organization or team, after having satisfied the conditions in paragraph (3) of such subsection when it began to participate in a demonstration project under this section, ceases to meet one or both of the conditions set forth in subparagraph (A) of such paragraph (3) as a result of a reorganization, restructuring, realignment, consolidation, or other organizational change. ‘(e) Assessments- (1) The Secretary of Defense shall designate an independent organization to conduct two assessments of the acquisition workforce demonstration project described in subsection (a). ‘(2) Each such assessment shall include the following: ‘(A) A description of the workforce included in the project. ‘(B) An explanation of the flexibilities used in the project to appoint individuals to the acquisition workforce and whether those appointments are based on competitive procedures and recognize veteran’s preferences. ‘(C) An explanation of the flexibilities used in the project to develop a performance appraisal system that recognizes excellence in performance and offers opportunities for improvement. ‘(D) The steps taken to ensure that such system is fair and transparent for all employees in the project. ‘(E) How the project allows the organization to better meet mission needs. ‘(F) An analysis of how the flexibilities in subparagraphs (B) and (C) are used, and what barriers have been encountered that inhibit their use. ‘(G) Whether there is a process for-- ‘(i) ensuring ongoing performance feedback and dialogue among supervisors, managers, and employees throughout the performance appraisal period; and ‘(ii) setting timetables for performance appraisals. ‘(H) The project’s impact on career progression. ‘(I) The project’s appropriateness or inappropriateness in light of the complexities of the workforce affected. ‘(J) The project’s sufficiency in terms of providing protections for diversity in promotion and retention of personnel. ‘(K) The adequacy of the training, policy guidelines, and other preparations afforded in connection with using the project. ‘(L) Whether there is a process for ensuring employee involvement in the development and improvement of the project. ‘(3) The first assessment under this subsection shall be completed not later than September 30, 2012. The second and final assessment shall be completed not later than September 30, 2016. The Secretary shall submit to the covered congressional committees a copy of each assessment within 30 days after receipt by the Secretary of the assessment. ‘(f) Covered Congressional Committees- In this section, the term ‘covered congressional committees’ means-- ‘(1) the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives; ‘(2) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; and ‘(3) the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives. ‘(g) Termination of Authority- The authority to conduct a demonstration program under this section shall terminate on September 30, 2017. ‘(h) Conversion- Within 6 months after the authority to conduct a demonstration project under this section is terminated as provided in subsection (g), employees in the project shall convert to the civilian personnel system created pursuant to section 9902 of title 5.’. (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT- The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter V of chapter 87 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1761 the following new item: ‘1762. Demonstration project relating to certain acquisition personnel management policies and procedures.’. (b) Conforming Repeal- Section 4308 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 ( (a) Career Paths- (1) AMENDMENT- Chapter 87 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1722a the following new section: ‘(a) Requirement for Policy and Guidance Regarding Civilian Personnel in Acquisition- The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall establish policies and issue guidance to ensure the proper development, assignment, and employment of civilian members of the acquisition workforce to achieve the objectives specified in subsection (b). ‘(b) Objectives- Policies established and guidance issued pursuant to subsection (a) shall ensure, at a minimum, the following: ‘(1) A career path in the acquisition field that attracts the highest quality civilian personnel, from either within or outside the Federal Government. ‘(2) A deliberate workforce development strategy that increases attainment of key experiences that contribute to a highly qualified acquisition workforce. ‘(3) Sufficient opportunities for promotion and advancement in the acquisition field. ‘(4) A sufficient number of qualified, trained members eligible for and active in the acquisition field to ensure adequate capacity, capability, and effective succession for acquisition functions, including contingency contracting, of the Department of Defense. ‘(5) A deliberate workforce development strategy that ensures diversity in promotion, advancement, and experiential opportunities commensurate with the general workforce outlined in this section. ‘(c) Inclusion of Information in Annual Report- The Secretary of Defense shall include in the report to Congress required under section 115b(d) of this title the following information related to the acquisition workforce for the period covered by the report (which shall be shown for the Department of Defense as a whole and separately for the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Defense Agencies, and Office of the Secretary of Defense): ‘(1) The total number of persons serving in the Acquisition Corps, set forth separately for members of the armed forces and civilian employees, by grade level and by functional specialty. ‘(2) The total number of critical acquisition positions held, set forth separately for members of the armed forces and civilian employees, by grade level and by other appropriate categories (including by program manager, deputy program manager, and division head positions), including average length of time served in each position. For each such category, the report shall specify the number of civilians holding such positions compared to the total number of positions filled. ‘(3) The number of employees to whom the requirements of subsections (b)(2)(A) and (b)(2)(B) of section 1732 of this title did not apply because of the exceptions provided in paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 1732(c) of this title, set forth separately by type of exception. ‘(4) The number of times a waiver authority was exercised under section 1724(d), 1732(d), 1734(d), or 1736(c) of this title or any other provision of this chapter (or other provision of law) which permits the waiver of any requirement relating to the acquisition workforce, and in the case of each such authority, the reasons for exercising the authority. The Secretary may present the information provided under this paragraph by category or grouping of types of waivers and reasons.’. (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT- The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter II of chapter 87 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1722a the following new item: ‘1722b. Special requirements for civilian employees in the acquisition field.’. (b) Career Education and Training- Section 1723 of such title is amended by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c) and inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection: ‘(b) Career Path Requirements- For each career path, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall establish requirements for the completion of course work and related on-the-job training and demonstration of qualifications in the critical acquisition-related duties and tasks of the career path. The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary, shall also-- ‘(1) encourage individuals in the acquisition workforce to maintain the currency of their acquisition knowledge and generally enhance their knowledge of related acquisition management disciplines through academic programs and other self-developmental activities; and ‘(2) develop key work experiences, including the creation of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense that facilitates the periodic interaction between individuals in the acquisition workforce and the end user in such end user’s environment to enhance the knowledge base of such workforce, for individuals in the acquisition workforce so that the individuals may gain in-depth knowledge and experience in the acquisition process and become seasoned, well-qualified members of the acquisition workforce.’. (a) Continuing Education- ‘(a) Qualification Requirements- (1) The Secretary of Defense shall establish education, training, and experience requirements for each acquisition position, based on the level of complexity of duties carried out in the position. In establishing such requirements, the Secretary shall ensure the availability and sufficiency of training in all areas of acquisition, including additional training courses with an emphasis on services contracting, market research strategies (including assessments of local contracting capabilities), long-term sustainment strategies, information technology, and rapid acquisition. ‘(2) In establishing such requirements for positions other than critical acquisition positions designated pursuant to section 1733 of this title, the Secretary may state the requirements by categories of positions. ‘(3) The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall establish requirements for continuing education and periodic renewal of an individual’s certification. Any requirement for a certification renewal shall not require a renewal more often than once every five years.’. (b) Standards for Training- (1) IN GENERAL- Subchapter IV of Chapter 87 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: ‘The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall develop fulfillment standards, and implement and maintain a program, for purposes of the training requirements of sections 1723, 1724, and 1735 of this title. Such fulfillment standards shall consist of criteria for determining whether an individual has demonstrated competence in the areas that would be taught in the training courses required under those sections. If an individual meets the appropriate fulfillment standard, the applicable training requirement is fulfilled.’. (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT- The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: ‘1748. Fulfillment standards for acquisition workforce training.’. (3) DEADLINE FOR FULFILLMENT STANDARDS- The fulfillment standards required under (4) CONFORMING REPEAL- Section 853 of (a) Plan Required- The Secretary of Defense shall develop and carry out a plan to strengthen the part of the acquisition workforce that specializes in information technology. The plan shall include the following: (1) Defined targets for billets devoted to information technology acquisition. (2) Specific certification requirements for individuals in the acquisition workforce who specialize in information technology acquisition. (3) Defined career paths for individuals in the acquisition workforce who specialize in information technology acquisitions. (b) Definitions- In this section: (1) The term ‘information technology’ has the meaning provided such term in (2) The term ‘major weapon system’ has the meaning provided such term in (c) Deadline- The Secretary of Defense shall develop the plan required under this section not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. ‘(18) The term ‘acquisition workforce’ means the persons serving in acquisition positions within the Department of Defense, as designated pursuant to section 1721(a) of this title.’. (a) Curriculum Review- Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall lead a review of the curriculum offered by the Defense Acquisition University to ensure it adequately supports the training and education requirements of acquisition professionals, particularly in service contracting, long term sustainment strategies, information technology, and rapid acquisition. The review shall also involve the service acquisition executives of each military department. (b) Analysis of Funding Requirements for Training- Following the review conducted under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall analyze the most recent future-years defense program to determine the amounts of estimated expenditures and proposed appropriations necessary to support the training requirements of the amendments made by section 874, including any new training requirements determined after the review conducted under subsection (a). The Secretary shall identify any additional funding needed for such training requirements in the separate chapter on the defense acquisition workforce required in the next annual strategic workforce plan under 115b of title 10, United States Code. (c) Requirement for Ongoing Curriculum Development With Certain Schools- (1) REQUIREMENT- ‘(c) Curriculum Development- The President of the Defense Acquisition University shall work with the relevant professional schools and degree-granting institutions of the Department of Defense and military departments to ensure that best practices are used in curriculum development to support acquisition workforce positions.’. (2) AMENDMENT TO SECTION HEADING- (A) The heading of section 1746 of such title is amended to read as follows: (B) The item relating to section 1746 in the table of sections at the beginning of subchapter IV of chapter 87 of such title is amended to read as follows: ‘1746. Defense Acquisition University.’. (a) Interim Milestones- (1) REQUIREMENT- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), in consultation with the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, the secretaries of the military departments, and the heads of the defense agencies and defense field activities, shall establish interim milestones for achieving audit readiness of the financial statements of the Department of Defense, consistent with the requirements of section 1003 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (2) MATTERS INCLUDED- The interim milestones established pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, for each military department and for the defense agencies and defense field activities-- (A) an interim milestone for achieving audit readiness for each major element of the statement of budgetary resources, including civilian pay, military pay, supply orders, contracts, and funds balance with the Treasury; and (B) an interim milestone for addressing the existence and completeness of each major category of Department of Defense assets, including military equipment, real property, inventory, and operating material and supplies. (3) DESCRIPTION IN SEMIANNUAL REPORTS- The Under Secretary shall describe each interim milestone established pursuant to paragraph (1) in the next semiannual report submitted pursuant to section 1003(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (b) Valuation of Department of Defense Assets- (1) REQUIREMENT- Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall, in consultation with other appropriate Federal agencies and officials-- (A) examine the costs and benefits of alternative approaches to the valuation of Department of Defense assets; (B) select an approach to such valuation that is consistent with principles of sound financial management and the conservation of taxpayer resources; and (C) begin the preparation of a business case analysis supporting the selected approach. (2) The Under Secretary shall include information on the alternatives considered, the selected approach, and the business case analysis supporting that approach in the next semiannual report submitted pursuant to section 1003(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (c) Remedial Actions Required- In the event that the Department of Defense, or any component of the Department of Defense, is unable to meet an interim milestone established pursuant to subsection (a), the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall-- (1) develop a remediation plan to ensure that-- (A) the component will meet the interim milestone no more than one year after the originally scheduled date; and (B) the component’s failure to meet the interim milestone will not have an adverse impact on the Department’s ability to carry out the plan under section 1003(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (2) include in the next semiannual report submitted pursuant to section 1003(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (A) a statement of the reasons why the Department of Defense, or component of the Department of Defense, will be unable to meet such interim milestone; (B) the revised completion date for meeting such interim milestone; and (C) a description of the actions that have been taken and are planned to be taken by the Department of Defense, or component of the Department of Defense, to meet such interim milestone. (d) Incentives for Achieving Auditability- (1) REVIEW REQUIRED- Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall review options for providing appropriate incentives to the military departments, Defense Agencies, and defense field activities to ensure that financial statements are validated as ready for audit earlier than September 30, 2017. (2) OPTIONS REVIEWED- The review performed pursuant to paragraph (1) shall consider changes in policy that reflect the increased confidence that can be placed in auditable financial statements, and shall include, at a minimum, consideration of the following options: (A) Consistent with the need to fund urgent warfighter requirements and operational needs, priority in the release of appropriated funds. (B) Relief from the frequency of financial reporting in cases in which such reporting is not required by law. (C) Relief from departmental obligation and expenditure thresholds to the extent that such thresholds establish requirements more restrictive than those required by law. (D) Increases in thresholds for reprogramming of funds. (E) Personnel management incentives for the financial and business management workforce. (F) Such other measures as the Under Secretary considers appropriate. (3) REPORT- The Under Secretary shall include a discussion of the review performed pursuant to paragraph (1) in the next semiannual report pursuant to section 1003(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (A) an assessment of the extent to which the implementation of the option-- (i) would be consistent with the efficient operation of the Department of Defense and the effective funding of essential Department of Defense programs and activities; and (ii) would contribute to the achievement of Department of Defense goals to prepare auditable financial statements; and (B) a recommendation on whether such option should be adopted, a schedule for implementing the option if adoption is recommended, or a reason for not recommending the option if adoption is not recommended. (a) Process Review- Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, in coordination with the Chief Management Officer of each military department, the Director of the Office of Performance Assessment and Root Cause Analysis, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), and the Comptrollers of the military departments, shall complete a comprehensive review of the use and value of obligation and expenditure benchmarks and propose new benchmarks or processes for tracking financial performance, including, as appropriate-- (1) increased reliance on individual obligation and expenditure plans for measuring program financial performance; (2) mechanisms to improve funding stability and to increase the predictability of the release of funding for obligation and expenditure; and (3) streamlined mechanisms for a program manager to submit an appeal for funding changes and to have such appeal evaluated promptly. (b) Training- The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall ensure that, as part of the training required for program managers and business managers, an emphasis is placed on obligating and expending appropriated funds in a manner that achieves the best value for the Government and that the purpose and limitations of obligation and expenditure benchmarks are made clear. (c) Report- The Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense shall include a report on the results of the review under this section in the next update of the strategic management plan transmitted to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives under section 904(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (a) Report- (1) REQUIREMENT- Not later than September 30, 2011, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a detailed report on the additional cost to the Department of Defense associated with compliance with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ( (2) MATTERS COVERED- The report required by paragraph (1) shall include an estimate of-- (A) the additional costs, if any, incurred on health care contracts to comply with such Acts; and (B) any other additional costs to the Department of Defense to comply with such Acts. (b) Health Care Contract Defined- In this section, the term ‘health care contract’ means a contract awarded by the Department of Defense in an amount greater than the simplified acquisition threshold for the acquisition of any of the following: (1) Medical supplies. (2) Health care services and administration, including the services of medical personnel. (3) Durable medical equipment. (4) Pharmaceuticals. (5) Health care-related information technology. (a) Program To Expand Industrial Base Required- The Secretary of Defense shall establish a program to expand the industrial base of the Department of Defense to increase the Department’s access to innovation and the benefits of competition. (b) Identifying and Communicating With Firms That Are Not Traditional Suppliers- The program established under subsection (a) shall use tools and resources available within the Federal Government and available from the private sector to provide a capability for identifying and communicating with firms that are not traditional suppliers, including commercial firms and firms of all business sizes, that are engaged in markets of importance to the Department of Defense in which such firms can make a significant contribution. (c) Outreach to Local Firms Near Defense Installations- The program established under subsection (a) shall include outreach, using procurement technical assistance centers, to firms of all business sizes in the vicinity of Department of Defense installations regarding opportunities to obtain contracts and subcontracts to perform work at such installations. (d) Industrial Base Review- The program established under subsection (a) shall include a continuous effort to review the industrial base supporting the Department of Defense, including the identification of markets of importance to the Department of Defense in which firms that are not traditional suppliers can make a significant contribution. (e) Firms That Are Not Traditional Suppliers- For purposes of this section, a firm is not a traditional supplier of the Department of Defense if it does not currently have contracts and subcontracts to perform work for the Department of Defense with a total combined value in excess of $500,000 (f) Procurement Technical Assistance Center- In this section, the term ‘procurement technical assistance center’ means a center operating under a cooperative agreement with the Defense Logistics Agency to provide procurement technical assistance pursuant to the authority provided in chapter 142 of title 10, United States Code. (a) Price Trend Analysis Procedures- (1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement procedures that, to the maximum extent practicable, provide for the collection and analysis of information on price trends for covered supplies and equipment purchased by the Department of Defense. The procedures shall include an automated process for identifying categories of covered supplies and equipment described in paragraph (2) that have experienced significant escalation in prices. (2) CATEGORY OF COVERED SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT- A category of covered supplies and equipment referred to in paragraph (1) consists of covered supplies and equipment that have the same National Stock Number, are in a single Federal Supply Group or Federal Supply Class, are provided by a single contractor, or are otherwise logically grouped for the purpose of analyzing information on price trends. (3) REQUIREMENT TO EXAMINE CAUSES OF ESCALATION- An analysis conducted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include, for any category in which significant escalation in prices is identified, a more detailed examination of the causes of escalation for such prices within the category and whether such price escalation is consistent across the Department of Defense. (4) REQUIREMENT TO ADDRESS UNJUSTIFIED ESCALATION- The head of a Defense Agency or the Secretary of a military department shall take appropriate action to address any unjustified escalation in prices being paid for items procured by that agency or military department as identified in an analysis conducted pursuant to paragraph (1). (b) Annual Report- Not later than April 1 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the analyses of price trends that were conducted for categories of covered supplies and equipment during the preceding fiscal year under the procedures implemented pursuant to paragraph (1). The report shall include a description of the actions taken to identify and address any unjustified price escalation for the categories of items. (c) Definitions- In this section: (1) SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT- The term ‘supplies and equipment’ means items classified as supplies and equipment under the Federal Supply Classification System. (2) COVERED SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT- The term ‘covered supplies and equipment’ means all supplies and equipment purchased by the Department of Defense. The term does not include major weapon systems but does include individual parts and components purchased as spare or replenishment parts for such weapon systems. (d) Sunset Date- This section shall not be in effect on and after April 1, 2015. (a) Improvement Program- Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop and initiate a program for the improvement of contractor business systems to ensure that such systems provide timely, reliable information for the management of Department of Defense programs by the contractor and by the Department. (b) Approval or Disapproval of Business Systems- The program developed pursuant to subsection (a) shall-- (1) include system requirements for each type of contractor business system covered by the program; (2) establish a process for reviewing contractor business systems and identifying significant deficiencies in such systems; (3) identify officials of the Department of Defense who are responsible for the approval or disapproval of contractor business systems; (4) provide for the approval of any contractor business system that does not have a significant deficiency; and (5) provide for-- (A) the disapproval of any contractor business system that has a significant deficiency; and (B) reduced reliance on, and enhanced scrutiny of, data provided by a contractor business system that has been disapproved. (c) Remedial Actions- The program developed pursuant to subsection (a) shall provide the following: (1) In the event a contractor business system is disapproved pursuant to subsection (b)(5), appropriate officials of the Department of Defense will be available to work with the contractor to develop a corrective action plan defining specific actions to be taken to address the significant deficiencies identified in the system and a schedule for the implementation of such actions. (2) An appropriate official of the Department of Defense may withhold up to 10 percent of progress payments, performance-based payments, and interim payments under covered contracts from a covered contractor, as needed to protect the interests of the Department and ensure compliance, if one or more of the contractor business systems of the contractor has been disapproved pursuant to subsection (b)(5) and has not subsequently received approval. (3) The amount of funds to be withheld under paragraph (2) shall be reduced if a contractor adopts an effective corrective action plan pursuant to paragraph (1) and is effectively implementing such plan. (d) Guidance and Training- The program developed pursuant to subsection (a) shall provide guidance and training to appropriate government officials on the data that is produced by contractor business systems and the manner in which such data should be used to effectively manage Department of Defense programs. (e) Rule of Construction- Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit an official of the Department of Defense from reviewing, approving, or disapproving a contractor business system pursuant to any applicable law or regulation in force as of the date of the enactment of this Act during the period between the date of the enactment of this Act and the date on which the Secretary implements the requirements of this section with respect to such system. (f) Definitions- In this section: (1) The term ‘contractor business system’ means an accounting system, estimating system, purchasing system, earned value management system, material management and accounting system, or property management system of a contractor. (2) The term ‘covered contractor’ means a contractor that is subject to the cost accounting standards under section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act ( (3) The term ‘covered contract’ means a cost-reimbursement contract, incentive-type contract, time-and-materials contract, or labor-hour contract that could be affected if the data produced by a contractor business system has a significant deficiency. (4) The term ‘significant deficiency’, in the case of a contractor business system, means a shortcoming in the system that materially affects the ability of officials of the Department of Defense and the contractor to rely upon information produced by the system that is needed for management purposes. (g) Defense Contract Audit Agency Legal Resources and Expertise- (1) REQUIREMENT- The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that-- (A) the Defense Contract Audit Agency has sufficient legal resources and expertise to conduct its work in compliance with applicable Department of Defense policies and procedures; and (B) such resources and expertise are provided in a manner that is consistent with the audit independence of the Defense Contract Audit Agency. (2) REPORT- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the steps taken to comply with the requirements of this subsection. (a) Review and Recommendations- The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of Small Business Programs in the Department of Defense, shall review barriers to firms that are not traditional suppliers to the Department of Defense wishing to contract with the Department of Defense and its defense supply centers and develop a set of recommendations on the elimination of such barriers. The Director shall identify and consult with a wide range of firms that are not traditional suppliers to the Department of Defense for the purpose of identifying such barriers and developing such recommendations. (b) Definition- For the purposes of this section, a firm is not a traditional supplier of the Department of Defense if it does not currently have contracts and subcontracts to perform work for the Department of Defense with a total combined value in excess of $500,000. (c) Report- Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report summarizing the findings and recommendations of the review conducted pursuant to this section. (a) Revised Definitions- (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘or maintenance’ and inserting ‘integration, services, or information technology’; (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘or production’ and inserting ‘production, integration, services, or information technology’; (3) in paragraph (9)(A), by striking ‘and manufacturing’ and inserting ‘manufacturing, integration, services, and information technology’; and (4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(15) The term ‘integration’ means the process of providing systems engineering and technical direction for a system for the purpose of achieving capabilities that satisfy program requirements.’. (b) Revised Objectives- Section 2501(a) of such title is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘Supplying and equipping’ and inserting ‘Supplying, equipping, and supporting’; (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘and logistics for’ and inserting ‘logistics, and other activities in support of’; (3) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘and produce’ and inserting ‘, produce, and support’; and (4) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (8) and inserting after paragraph (5) the following new paragraphs: ‘(6) Providing for the generation of services capabilities that are not core functions of the armed forces and that are critical to military operations within the national technology and industrial base. ‘(7) Providing for the development, production, and integration of information technology within the national technology and industrial base.’. (c) Revised Assessments- Section 2505(b)(4) of such title is amended by inserting after ‘of this title)’ the following ‘or major automated information system programs (as defined in section 2445a of this title)’. (d) Revised Policy Guidance- Section 2506(a) of such title is amended by striking ‘budget allocation, weapons’ and inserting ‘strategy, management, budget allocation,’. (a) Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense- Chapter 7 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 139d the following new section: ‘(a) Appointment- There is a Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy, who shall be appointed by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and shall report to the Under Secretary. ‘(b) Responsibilities- The Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy shall be the principal advisor to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics in the performance of the Under Secretary’s duties relating to the following: ‘(1) Providing input on industrial base matters to strategy reviews, including quadrennial defense reviews conducted pursuant to section 118 of this title. ‘(2) Establishing policies of the Department of Defense for maintenance of the defense industrial base of the United States. ‘(3) Providing recommendations to the Under Secretary on budget matters pertaining to the industrial base. ‘(4) Providing recommendations to the Under Secretary on supply chain management and supply chain vulnerability. ‘(5) Providing input on industrial base matters to defense acquisition policy guidance. ‘(6) Establishing the national security objectives concerning the national technology and industrial base required under section 2501 of this title. ‘(7) Executing the national defense program for analysis of the national technology and industrial base required under section 2503 of this title. ‘(8) Performing the national technology and industrial base periodic defense capability assessments required under section 2505 of this title. ‘(9) Establishing the technology and industrial base policy guidance required under section 2506 of this title. ‘(10) Executing the authorities of the Manufacturing Technology Program under section 2521 of this title. ‘(11) Carrying out the activities of the Department of Defense relating to the Defense Production Act Committee established under section 722 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. App. 2171). ‘(12) Consistent with section 2(b) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. App. 2062(b)), executing other applicable authorities provided under the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. App. 2061 et seq.), including authorities under titles I and II of such Act. ‘(13) Establishing policies related to international technology security and export control issues. ‘(14) Establishing policies related to industrial independent research and development programs under section 2372 of this title. ‘(15) Such other duties as are assigned by the Under Secretary. ‘(c) Rule of Construction- Nothing in subsection (b)(9) may be construed to limit the authority or modify the policies of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States established under section 721(k) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. App. 2170(k)).’. (b) Industrial Base Fund- (1) IN GENERAL- Chapter 148 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: ‘(a) Establishment- The Secretary of Defense shall establish an Industrial Base Fund (in this section referred to as the ‘Fund’). ‘(b) Control of Fund- The Fund shall be under the control of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, acting through the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy. ‘(c) Amounts in Fund- The Fund shall consist of amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to the Fund. ‘(d) Use of Fund- Subject to subsection (e), the Fund shall be used-- ‘(1) to support the monitoring and assessment of the industrial base required by this chapter; ‘(2) to address critical issues in the industrial base relating to urgent operational needs; ‘(3) to support efforts to expand the industrial base; and ‘(4) to address supply chain vulnerabilities. ‘(e) Use of Fund Subject to Appropriations- The authority of the Secretary of Defense to use the Fund under this section in any fiscal year is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose. ‘(f) Expenditures- The Secretary shall establish procedures for expending monies in the Fund in support of the uses identified in subsection (d), including the following: ‘(1) Direct obligations from the Fund. ‘(2) Transfers of monies from the Fund to relevant appropriations of the Department of Defense.’. (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT- The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: ‘2508. Industrial Base Fund.’. TITLE IX--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT Sec. 901. Reorganization of Office of the Secretary of Defense to carry out reduction required by law in number of Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense. Sec. 911. Integrated space architectures. Sec. 912. Limitation on use of funds for costs of terminating contracts under the National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System Program. Sec. 913. Limitation on use of funds for purchasing Global Positioning System user equipment. Sec. 914. Plan for integration of space-based nuclear detection sensors. Sec. 915. Preservation of the solid rocket motor industrial base. Sec. 916. Implementation plan to sustain solid rocket motor industrial base. Sec. 917. Review and plan on sustainment of liquid rocket propulsion systems industrial base. Sec. 921. Five-year extension of authority for Secretary of Defense to engage in commercial activities as security for intelligence collection activities. Sec. 922. Modification of attendees at proceedings of Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Integration Council. Sec. 923. Report on Department of Defense interservice management and coordination of remotely piloted aircraft support of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. Sec. 924. Report on requirements fulfillment and personnel management relating to Air Force intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance provided by remotely piloted aircraft. Sec. 931. Continuous monitoring of Department of Defense information systems for cybersecurity. Sec. 932. Strategy on computer software assurance. Sec. 933. Strategy for acquisition and oversight of Department of Defense cyber warfare capabilities. Sec. 934. Report on the cyber warfare policy of the Department of Defense. Sec. 935. Reports on Department of Defense progress in defending the Department and the defense industrial base from cyber events. Sec. 941. Two-year extension of authorities relating to temporary waiver of reimbursement of costs of activities for nongovernmental personnel at Department of Defense Regional Centers for Security Studies. Sec. 942. Additional requirements for quadrennial roles and missions review in 2011. Sec. 943. Report on organizational structure and policy guidance of the Department of Defense regarding information operations. Sec. 944. Report on organizational structures of the geographic combatant command headquarters. Subtitle A--Department of Defense Management (a) Redesignation of Certain Positions in Office of Secretary of Defense- (1) REDESIGNATION- Positions in the Office of the Secretary of Defense are hereby redesignated as follows: (A) The Director of Defense Research and Engineering is redesignated as the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. (B) The Director of Operational Energy Plans and Programs is redesignated as the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and Programs. (C) The Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Nuclear and Chemical and Biological Defense Programs is redesignated as the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs. (2) REFERENCES- Any reference in any law, rule, regulation, paper, or other record of the United States to an office of the Department of Defense redesignated by paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a reference to such office as so redesignated. (b) Amendments to Chapter 4 of Title 10 Relating to Reorganization- (1) REPEAL OF SEPARATE PRINCIPAL DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE PROVISIONS- Sections 133a, 134a, and 136a of title 10, United States Code, are repealed. (2) COMPONENTS OF OSD- Subsection (b) of section 131 of such title is amended to read as follows: ‘(b) The Office of the Secretary of Defense is composed of the following: ‘(1) The Deputy Secretary of Defense. ‘(2) The Under Secretaries of Defense, as follows: ‘(A) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. ‘(B) The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. ‘(C) The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller). ‘(D) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. ‘(E) The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence. ‘(3) The Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense. ‘(4) Other officers who are appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, and who report directly to the Secretary and Deputy Secretary without intervening authority, as follows: ‘(A) The Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. ‘(B) The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. ‘(C) The General Counsel of the Department of Defense. ‘(D) The Inspector General of the Department of Defense. ‘(5) The Principal Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense. ‘(6) The Assistant Secretaries of Defense. ‘(7) Other officials provided for by law, as follows: ‘(A) The Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation appointed pursuant to section 139b(a) of this title. ‘(B) The Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering appointed pursuant to section 139b(b) of this title. ‘(C) The Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy appointed pursuant to section 139c of this title. ‘(D) The Director of Small Business Programs appointed pursuant to section 144 of this title. ‘(E) The official designated under section 1501(a) of this title to have responsibility for Department of Defense matters relating to missing persons as set forth in section 1501 of this title. ‘(F) The Director of Family Policy under section 1781 of this title. ‘(G) The Director of the Office of Corrosion Policy and Oversight assigned pursuant to section 2228(a) of this title. ‘(H) The official designated under section 2438(a) of this title to have responsibility for conducting and overseeing performance assessments and root cause analyses for major defense acquisition programs. ‘(8) Such other offices and officials as may be established by law or the Secretary of Defense may establish or designate in the Office.’. (3) PRINCIPAL DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARIES OF DEFENSE- Section 137a of such title is amended-- (A) in subsections (a)(1), (b), and (d), by striking ‘Deputy Under’ and inserting ‘Principal Deputy Under’; (B) in subsection (a)(2), by striking ‘(A) The’ and all that follows through ‘(5) of subsection (c)’ and inserting ‘The Principal Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense’; (C) in subsection (c)-- (i) in paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), and (5), by striking ‘One of the Deputy’ and inserting ‘One of the Principal Deputy’; (ii) in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), by striking ‘appointed’ and all that follows through ‘this title’; (iii) in paragraphs (4) and (5), by striking ‘shall be’ and inserting ‘is’; and (iv) in paragraph (5), by inserting before the period at the end the following: ‘, who shall be appointed from among persons who have extensive expertise in intelligence matters’; and (D) in subsection (d), by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘The Principal Deputy Under Secretaries shall take precedence among themselves in the order prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.’. (4) ASSISTANT SECRETARIES OF DEFENSE GENERALLY- Section 138 of such title is amended-- (A) in subsection (a)-- (i) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘12’ and inserting ‘16’; and (ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘(A) The’ and all that follows through ‘The other’ and inserting ‘The’; (B) in subsection (b)-- (i) in paragraphs (2), (3), (4), (5), and (6), by striking ‘shall be’ and inserting ‘is’; (ii) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘appointed pursuant to section 138a of this title’; and (iii) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: ‘(8) One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. In addition to any duties and powers prescribed under paragraph (1), the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering shall have the duties specified in section 138b of this title. ‘(9) One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and Programs. In addition to any duties and powers prescribed under paragraph (1), the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and Programs shall have the duties specified in section 138c of this title. ‘(10) One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs. In addition to any duties and powers prescribed under paragraph (1), the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs shall have the duties specified in section 138d of this title.’; and (C) in subsection (d), by striking ‘and the Director of Defense Research and Engineering’ and inserting ‘the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, the officials serving in positions specified in section 131(b)(4) of this title, and the Principal Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense’. (5) ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR LOGISTICS AND MATERIEL READINESS- Section 138a(a) of such title is amended-- (A) by striking ‘There is a’ and inserting ‘The’; and (B) by striking ‘, appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Assistant Secretary’. (6) ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING- Section 139a of such title is transferred so as to appear after section 138a, redesignated as section 138b, and amended-- (A) by striking subsection (a); (B) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (a) and (b), respectively; (C) in subsection (a), as so redesignated, by striking ‘Director of Defense Research and Engineering’ and inserting ‘Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering’; and (D) in subsection (b), as so redesignated-- (i) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘Director of Defense Research and Engineering,’ and inserting ‘Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering,’; and (ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘Director’ and inserting ‘Assistant Secretary’. (7) ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR OPERATIONAL ENERGY PLANS AND PROGRAMS- Section 139b of such title is transferred so as to appear after section 138b (as transferred and redesignated by paragraph (6)), redesignated as section 138c, and amended-- (A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘There is a’ and all that follows through ‘The Director’ and inserting ‘The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and Programs’; (B) by striking ‘Director’ each place it appears and inserting ‘Assistant Secretary’; (C) in subsection (d)(2)-- (i) by striking ‘Not later than’ and all that follows through ‘military departments’ and inserting ‘The Secretary of each military department’; (ii) by striking ‘who will’ and inserting ‘who shall’; and (iii) by inserting ‘so designated’ after ‘The officials’; and (D) in subsection (d)(4), by striking ‘The initial’ and all that follows through ‘updates to the strategy’ and inserting ‘Updates to the strategy required by paragraph (1)’. (8) ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR NUCLEAR, CHEMICAL, AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAMS- Section 142 of such title is transferred so as to appear after section 138c (as redesignated and transferred by paragraph (7)), redesignated as section 138d, and amended-- (A) by striking subsection (a); (B) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (a) and in that subsection, as so redesignated, by striking ‘The Assistant to the Secretary’ and inserting ‘The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs’; and (C) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following new subsection (b): ‘(b) The Assistant Secretary may communicate views on issues within the responsibility of the Assistant Secretary directly to the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense without obtaining the approval or concurrence of any other official within the Department of Defense.’. (c) Deputy Chief Management Officer- (1) IN GENERAL- Chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended by inserting after section 132 the following new section: ‘(a) Appointment- There is a Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. ‘(b) Responsibilities- The Deputy Chief Management Officer assists the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the Deputy Secretary’s capacity as Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense under section 132(c) of this title. ‘(c) Precedence- The Deputy Chief Management Officer takes precedence in the Department of Defense after the Secretary of Defense, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Secretaries of the military departments, and the Under Secretaries of Defense.’. (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT- Section 132(c) of such title is amended by striking the second sentence. (d) Senior Official Responsible for Performance Assessments and Root Cause Analyses of MDAPs- Section 103 of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 ( (1) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ‘ (2) in subsection (b)(5)-- (A) by striking ‘ (B) by striking ‘prior to’ both places it appears and inserting ‘before’; (3) in subsection (d), by striking ‘ (4) in subsection (f), by striking ‘beginning in 2010,’. (e) Redesignation of DDTE as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Developmental Test and Evaluation and DSE as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering- (1) by striking ‘Director of Developmental Test and Evaluation’ each place it appears and inserting ‘Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation’; (2) by striking ‘Director of Systems Engineering’ each place it appears and inserting ‘Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering’; (3) in subsection (a)-- (A) by striking the subsection heading and inserting ‘Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation- ’; (B) by striking ‘Director’ each place it appears in paragraphs (2), (3), and (6) and inserting ‘Deputy Assistant Secretary’; (C) in paragraph (4), by striking the paragraph heading and inserting ‘COORDINATION WITH DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING- ’; (D) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘Director’ in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) and inserting ‘Deputy Assistant Secretary’; and (E) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘Director’s’ and inserting ‘Deputy Assistant Secretary’s’; and (4) in subsection (b)-- (A) by striking the subsection heading and inserting ‘Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering- ’; (B) by striking ‘Director’ each place it appears in paragraphs (2), (3), (5), and (6) and inserting ‘Deputy Assistant Secretary’; (C) in paragraph (4), by striking the paragraph heading and inserting ‘COORDINATION WITH DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TEST AND EVALUATION- ’; and (D) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘Director’s’ and inserting ‘Deputy Assistant Secretary’s’. (f) Reorganization of Certain Provisions Within Chapter 4 To Account for Other Transfers of Provisions- Chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended by redesignating sections 139c, 139d (as amended by subsection (e)), and 139e (as added by section 896 of this Act) as sections 139a, 139b, and 139c, respectively. (g) Repeal of Statutory Requirement for Office for Missing Personnel in OSD- (1) by striking the subsection heading and inserting the following: ‘Responsibility for Missing Personnel- ’; (2) in paragraph (1)-- (A) by striking ‘establish within the Office of the Secretary of Defense an office to have responsibility for Department of Defense policy’ in the first sentence and inserting ‘designate within the Office of the Secretary of Defense an official as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Affairs to have responsibility for Department of Defense matters’; (B) by striking the second sentence; (C) by striking ‘of the office’ and inserting ‘of the official designated under this paragraph’; (D) by striking ‘and’ at the end of subparagraph (A); (E) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C); and (F) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new subparagraph (B): ‘(B) policy, control, and oversight of the program established under section 1509 of this title, as well as the accounting for missing persons (including locating, recovering, and identifying missing persons or their remains after hostilities have ceased); and’; (3) by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), (4), and (5) as paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and (6), respectively; (4) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): ‘(2) The official designated under paragraph (1) shall also serve as the Director, Defense Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Office, as established under paragraph (6)(A), exercising authority, direction, and control over that activity.’. (5) in paragraph (3), as so redesignated-- (A) by striking ‘of the office’ the first place it appears; and (B) by striking ‘head of the office’ and inserting ‘official designated under paragraph (1) and (2)’; (6) in paragraph (4), as so redesignated-- (A) by striking ‘office’ and inserting ‘designated official’; and (B) by inserting after ‘evasion)’ the following: ‘and for personnel accounting (including locating, recovering, and identifying missing persons or their remains after hostilities have ceased)’; (7) in paragraph (5), as so redesignated, by striking ‘office’ and inserting ‘designated official’; and (8) in paragraph (6), as so redesignated-- (A) in subparagraph (A)-- (i) by inserting after ‘(A)’ the following: ‘The Secretary of Defense shall establish an activity to account for personnel who are missing or whose remains have not been recovered from the conflict in which they were lost. This activity shall be known as the Defense Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Office.’; and (ii) by striking ‘office’ both places it appears and inserting ‘activity’; (B) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking ‘to the office’ and inserting ‘activity’; (C) in subparagraph (B)(ii)-- (i) by striking ‘to the office’ and inserting ‘activity’; and (ii) by striking ‘of the office’ and inserting ‘of the activity’; and (D) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘office’ and inserting ‘activity’. (h) Clarification of Head of Office for Family Policy- (1) in subsection (a), by striking the second sentence and inserting the following new sentence: ‘The office shall be headed by the Director of Family Policy, who shall serve within the office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness.’; and (2) by striking ‘the Office’ each place it appears and inserting ‘the Director’. (i) Modification of Statutory Limitation on Number of Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense- (1) DELAY IN LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF DUSDS- Section 906(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (2) TEMPORARY AUTHORITY FOR ADDITIONAL DUSDS- During the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on January 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense may, in the Secretary’s discretion, appoint not more than five Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense in addition to the five Principal Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense authorized by (3) REPORT ON PLAN FOR REORGANIZATION OF OSD- (A) REPORT REQUIRED- Not later than September 15, 2013, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth a plan for the realignment of the organizational structure of the Office of the Secretary of Defense to comply with the requirement of section 906(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, as amended by paragraph (1). (B) ELEMENTS- In preparing the report required by subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall consider, at a minimum, the feasibility of taking the following actions on or before January 1, 2015: (i) A merger of the position of Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment) and the position of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and Programs (as established in accordance with the amendments made by subsection (b)(7)) into a single Assistant Secretary position. (ii) A realignment of positions within the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy to eliminate the position of Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Strategy, Plans, and Forces). (j) Other Conforming Amendments to Title 10- (1) (A) in paragraphs (2) and (3), by striking ‘Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Nuclear and Chemical and Biological Defense Programs’ and inserting ‘Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs’; and (B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘that Assistant to the Secretary’ and inserting ‘Assistant Secretary’. (2) Section 2272 of such title is amended by striking ‘Director of Defense Research and Engineering’ each place it appears and inserting ‘Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering’. (3) Section 2365 of such title is amended-- (A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘Director of Defense Research and Engineering’ and inserting ‘Assistant Secretary’; (B) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ‘Director’ and inserting ‘Assistant Secretary’; (C) in subsection (d)(2)-- (i) by striking ‘Director of Defense Research and Engineering’ and inserting ‘Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering’; and (ii) by striking ‘Director may’ and inserting ‘Assistant Secretary may’; and (D) in subsection (e), by striking ‘Director’ and inserting ‘Assistant Secretary’. (4) Sections 2350a(g)(3), 2366b(a)(3)(D), 2374a(a), and 2517(a) of such title are amended by striking ‘Director of Defense Research and Engineering’ and inserting ‘Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering’. (5) Section 2902(b) of such title is amended-- (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Science and Technology’ and inserting ‘official within the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering who is responsible for science and technology’; and (B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘Deputy Under Secretary of Defense’ and inserting ‘official within the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics who is’. (k) Section Heading and Clerical Amendments- (1) SECTION HEADING AMENDMENTS- (A) The heading of (B) The heading of section 138b of such title, as transferred and redesignated by subsection (b)(6), is amended to read as follows: (C) The heading of section 138c of such title, as transferred and redesignated by subsection (b)(7), is amended to read as follows: (D) The heading of section 138d of such title, as transferred and redesignated by subsection (b)(8), is amended to read as follows: (E) The section heading of section 139b of such title, as redesignated by subsection (f), is amended to read as follows: (F) The heading of section 2438 of such title, as transferred and redesignated by subsection (d), is amended to read as follows: (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS- (A) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 4 of such title is amended-- (i) by inserting after the item relating to section 132 the following new item: ‘132a. Deputy Chief Management Officer.’; (ii) by striking the items relating to sections 133a, 134a, and 136a; (iii) by striking the item relating to section 137a and inserting the following new item: ‘137a. Principal Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense.’; (iv) by inserting after the item relating to section 138a the following new items: ‘138b. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. ‘138c. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and Programs. ‘138d. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs.’; (v) by striking the items relating to sections 139a, 139b, 139c, and 139d and inserting the following new items: ‘139a. Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. ‘139b. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation; Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering: joint guidance. ‘139c. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy.’; and (vi) by striking the item relating to section 142. (B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 144 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2437 the following new item: ‘2438. Performance assessments and root cause analyses.’. (l) Other Conforming Amendments- (1) PUBLIC LAW 111-23- Section 102(b) of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 ( (A) by striking ‘Director of Developmental Test and Evaluation and the Director of Systems Engineering’ each place it appears and inserting ‘Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation and the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering’; and (B) in paragraph (3)-- (i) by striking the paragraph heading and inserting ‘ASSESSMENT OF REPORTS BY DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TEST AND EVALUATION AND DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING- ’; and (ii) by striking ‘Directors’ and inserting ‘Deputy Assistant Secretaries of Defense’. (2) PUBLIC LAW 110-181- Section 214 of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2008 ( (m) Technical Amendments- (1) (2) Section 132 of such title is amended by redesignating subsection (d), as added by section 2831(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of (3) Section 135(c) of such title is amended by striking ‘clauses’ and inserting ‘paragraphs’. (n) Executive Schedule Amendments- (1) NUMBER OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE POSITIONS- ‘Assistant Secretaries of Defense (16).’. (2) POSITIONS REDESIGNATED AS ASD POSITIONS- (A) Section 5315 of such title is further amended by striking the item relating to Director of Defense Research and Engineering. (B) Section 5316 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Nuclear and Chemical and Biological Defense Programs. (3) AMENDMENTS TO STRIKE REFERENCES TO POSITIONS IN SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE- Section 5316 of such title is further amended-- (A) by striking the item relating to Director, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense; (B) by striking the item relating to Deputy General Counsel, Department of Defense; (C) by striking the item relating to Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense for Research and Engineering, Department of Defense; and (D) by striking the item relating to Special Assistant to the Secretary of Defense. (o) Inapplicability of Appointment Requirement to Certain Individuals Serving on Effective Date- (1) IN GENERAL- Notwithstanding this section and the amendments made by this section, the individual serving as specified in paragraph (2) on December 31, 2010, may continue to serve in the applicable position specified in that paragraph after that date without the requirement for appointment by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. (2) COVERED INDIVIDUALS AND POSITIONS- The individuals and positions specified in this paragraph are the following: (A) In the case of the individual serving as Director of Defense Research and Engineering, the position of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. (B) In the case of the individual serving as Director of Operational Energy Plans and Programs, the position of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and Programs. (C) In the case of the individual serving as Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Nuclear and Chemical and Biological Defense Programs, the position of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs. (p) Effective Date- (1) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in paragraph (2), this section and the amendments made by this section shall take effect on January 1, 2011. (2) CERTAIN MATTERS- Subsection (i) and the amendments made by that subsection, and subsection (o), shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. Subtitle B--Space Activities The Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall develop an integrated process for national security space architecture planning, development, coordination, and analysis that-- (1) encompasses defense and intelligence space plans, programs, budgets, and organizations; (2) provides mid-term to long-term recommendations to guide space-related defense and intelligence acquisitions, requirements, and investment decisions; (3) is independent of, but coordinated with, the space architecture planning, development, coordination, and analysis activities of each military department and each element of the intelligence community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 ( (4) makes use of, to the maximum extent practicable, joint duty assignment (as defined in None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act to the Secretary of Defense for the National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System Program may be obligated or expended for the costs of terminating a contract awarded under the Program unless the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Commerce enter into an agreement under which the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Commerce will each be responsible for half the costs of terminating the contract. (a) In General- Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act or any other Act for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to purchase user equipment for the Global Positioning System during fiscal years after fiscal year 2017 unless the equipment is capable of receiving the military code (commonly known as the ‘M code’) from the Global Positioning System. (b) Exception- The limitation under subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to the purchase of passenger vehicles or commercial vehicles in which Global Positioning System equipment is installed. (c) Waiver- The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation under subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that-- (1) suitable user equipment capable of receiving the military code from the Global Positioning System is not available; or (2) with respect to a purchase of user equipment, the Department of Defense does not require that user equipment to be capable of receiving the military code from the Global Positioning System. (a) In General- The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and the Administrator for Nuclear Security, submit to the congressional defense committees a plan to integrate space-based nuclear detection sensors in a geosynchronous orbit on the Space-Based Infrared System or other satellite platforms. (b) Limitation on Use of Funds for the Space-Based Infrared System- (1) IN GENERAL- Not more than 90 percent of the amounts specified in paragraph (2) may be obligated or expended before the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees the plan required by subsection (a). (2) AMOUNTS SPECIFIED- The amounts specified in this paragraph are the following: (A) The amount authorized to be appropriated by section 103 for procurement for the Air Force for missiles for the Space-Based Infrared System. (B) The amount authorized to be appropriated by section 201 for research, development, test, and evaluation for the Air Force for the Space-Based Infrared System. (a) Report- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the impact of the cancellation of the Constellation program of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration on any anticipated next generation mission requirements for missile defense interceptors, tactical and strategic missiles, targets, and satellite and human spaceflight launch vehicles. (b) Elements- The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A description and assessment of the effects on Department of Defense programs that utilize solid rocket motors of the cancellation of the Ares I, the Ares V, or their solid rocket alternatives or derivatives, and all supporting elements. (2) A description of the plans of the Department of Defense to mitigate the impact of the cancellation of the Ares I, the Ares V, or their solid rocket alternatives or derivatives, and all supporting elements, on the United States solid rocket motor industrial base, including a description of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and Department of Defense funding required to implement such plans between fiscal years 2012 and 2017. (3) A description of the impact of the cancellation of the Ares I, Ares V, or their solid rocket alternatives or derivatives, and all supporting elements, on international partners in programs such as the D-5 Trident missile. (4) A detailed description of the source of the data used in the report. (c) Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined- In this subsection, the term ‘appropriate committees of Congress’ means-- (1) the Committees on Armed Services, Commerce, Science, and Transportation, and Appropriations of the Senate; and (2) the Committees on Armed Services, Science and Technology, and Appropriations of the House of Representatives. (a) In General- The Secretary of Defense shall develop an implementation plan to sustain the solid rocket motor industrial base that-- (1) is based on the recommendations included in the report submitted to the congressional defense committees under section 1078 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (2) includes a funding plan for carrying out the implementation plan. (b) Submittal to Congress- The implementation plan required by subsection (a) shall be submitted to Congress with the budget of the President for fiscal year 2012 as submitted under (a) In General- The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, review, and develop a plan to sustain, the liquid rocket propulsion systems industrial base. (b) Elements- The review and plan required by subsection (a) shall address the following: (1) The capacity to maintain currently available liquid rocket propulsion systems. (2) The maintenance of an intellectual and engineering capacity to support next generation liquid rocket propulsion systems and engines, as needed. (3) Opportunities for interagency collaboration and research and development on future propulsion systems. (c) Submittal to Congress- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the plan required by subsection (a). Subtitle C--Intelligence-Related Matters The second sentence of (a) Findings- Section 923(a)(4) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 ( (b) Additional Authorized Attendees- ‘(4) Each Secretary of a military department may designate an officer or employee of such military department to attend the proceedings of the Council as a representative of such military department.’. (a) Report Required- (1) REPORT TO SECRETARY OF DEFENSE BY CHIEFS OF STAFF- Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief of Staff of the Army, the Chief of Naval Operations, and the Chief of Staff of the Air Force shall jointly submit to the Secretary of Defense a report, in accordance with this section, on remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) support of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) within their respective Armed Forces. (2) TRANSMITTAL TO CONGRESS- Not later than 30 days after the receipt of the report required by paragraph (1), the Secretary shall transmit the report, together with the assessment and any recommendations of the Secretary (including the matters required pursuant to subsection (b)(2)), to the congressional defense committees. (b) Elements- The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) In the case of the report required by subsection (a)(1), a description by each chief of staff referred to in that subsection of-- (A) current and planned remotely piloted aircraft inventories to support intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements over the period 2011 to 2020, including an identification of systems each Armed Force considers organic and the systems capable of providing theater-level support to the commanders of the combatant commands; (B) policy and processes of each Armed Force for coordinating investments in remotely piloted aircraft to meet joint force requirements for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance and to eliminate unnecessary duplication in both development and capability; and (C) the current employment of remotely piloted aircraft by each Armed Force, including the number of remotely piloted aircraft deployed in support operations, the number of remotely piloted aircraft assigned for training, and the number of remotely piloted aircraft warehoused, the capacity of each Armed Force to process, exploit, and disseminate intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance data collected, and the extent to which assets are provided to the joint community to meet requirements of the combatant commands. (2) In the case of the transmittal required by subsection (a)(2)-- (A) an assessment of the effectiveness of the employment of remotely piloted aircraft by each Armed Force, and a description of the percentage of joint force requirements for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance that are being met by the remotely piloted aircraft of each Armed Force; (B) a description of the joint concept of operations under which each Armed Force provides intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities through remotely piloted aircraft to meet the requirements of the combatant commands; (C) a description of the processes by which current requirements of the commanders of the combatant commands for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance are validated, and how the remotely piloted aircraft capabilities of each Armed Force are assigned against validated requirements; (D) a description of the current intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements of each combatant command through remotely piloted aircraft; (E) a description of how the requirements described under subparagraph (D) are being met; (F) an identification of any mission degradation or failure within the combatant commands due to lack of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance support; (G) a description of various means of addressing any shortfalls in meeting the requirements described under subparagraph (D), including temporary shortfalls and permanent shortfalls; (H) a description of the organization of the Unmanned Aerial System Task Force, including the goals and objectives of the task force and the participation and roles of each Armed Force within the task force; (I) a description of the organization of the Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Task Force, including the goals and objectives of the task force and the participation and roles of each Armed Force within the task force; and (J) an identification of any theater-level intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capacity of an Armed Force that is not being made available by services to fulfill joint force requirements for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. (c) Remotely Piloted Aircraft Defined- In this section, the term ‘ remotely piloted aircraft’ means any unmanned aircraft operated remotely, whether within or beyond line-of-sight, including unmanned aerial systems (UAS), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), remotely piloted vehicles (RPV), and remotely piloted aircraft (RPA). (a) Report Required- Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on requirements fulfillment and personnel management in connection with Air Force intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) provided by remotely piloted aircraft (RPA). (b) Elements- The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A description of the Joint Concept of Operation under which the Air Force operates to fulfill intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements provided by remotely piloted aircraft. (2) A description of the current requirements of each combatant command for Air Force intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance provided by remotely piloted aircraft, including-- (A) the number of orbits or combat air patrols for each major platform and sensor payload combination; (B) the number of aircraft, aircraft operators, and ground crews in each orbit or combat air patrol, variations in the numbers of each, and the explanation for such variations; (C) a description of how requirements are being met by the management of personnel, platforms, sensors, and networks; and (D) a description of various means of addressing any shortfalls in meeting such requirements, including temporary shortfalls and permanent shortfalls. (3) A description of manpower management to fulfill Air Force mission requirements for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements provided by remotely piloted aircraft, including the current number of personnel associated with each combat air patrol by remotely piloted aircraft for aircraft pilots, sensor operators, mission intelligence coordinators, and processing, exploitation, and dissemination analysts (in this section referred to as ‘operators and analysts for remotely piloted aircraft’). (4) A description of current Air Force manpower requirements for operators and analysts for remotely piloted aircraft, and any plans for meeting such requirements, including-- (A) an identification of any shortfalls in personnel, skill specialties, and grades; and (B) any plans of the Air Force to address such shortfalls, including-- (i) plans to address shortfalls in applicable career field retention rates; and (ii) plans for utilization of National Guard and other reserve component personnel to address shortfalls in such personnel, skill specialties, and grades. (5) A description of the projected Air Force manpower requirements for operators and analysts for remotely piloted aircraft in each of 2015 and 2020, including-- (A) an identification of any significant challenges to achieving such requirements in particular skill specialties and grades; and (B) any plans of the Air Force to address such challenges. (6) A description of the collaboration of the Air Force with, and the reliance of the Air Force on, the other Armed Forces and the combat support agencies, in asset management for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance by remotely piloted aircraft, including personnel for processing, exploitation, and dissemination. (7) A description of potential adverse consequences of operating intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance by remotely piloted aircraft, and associated intelligence support infrastructure, in a surge, understaffed state, or both, including-- (A) the impact of having to provide forward processing, exploitation, and dissemination to support emerging capabilities; and (B) any plans of the Air Force to mitigate such consequences. (8) A description of the status of Air Force training programs for operators and analysts for remotely piloted aircraft, including the ability to meet Air Force manpower requirements for such operators and analysts, and plans for increasing training capacity to match plans for expanding Air Force intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities. (c) Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined- In this section, the term ‘appropriate committees of Congress’ means-- (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. Subtitle D--Cyber Warfare, Cyber Security, and Related Matters (a) In General- The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense to work, in coordination with the Chief Information Officers of the military departments and the Defense Agencies and with senior cybersecurity and information assurance officials within the Department of Defense and otherwise within the Federal Government, to achieve, to the extent practicable, the following: (1) The continuous prioritization of the policies, principles, standards, and guidelines developed under section 20 of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act ( (2) The automation of continuous monitoring of the effectiveness of the information security policies, procedures, and practices within the information infrastructure of the Department of Defense, and the compliance of that infrastructure with such policies, procedures, and practices, including automation of-- (A) management, operational, and technical controls of every information system identified in the inventory required under (B) management, operational, and technical controls relied on for evaluations under (b) Definitions- In this section: (1) The term ‘information security incident’ means an occurrence that-- (A) actually or potentially jeopardizes the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of an information system or the information such system processes, stores, or transmits; or (B) constitutes a violation or imminent threat of violation of security policies, security procedures, or acceptable use policies with respect to an information system. (2) The term ‘information infrastructure’ means the underlying framework, equipment, and software that an information system and related assets rely on to process, transmit, receive, or store information electronically. (3) The term ‘national security system’ has the meaning given that term in (a) Strategy Required- The Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement, by not later than October 1, 2011, a strategy for assuring the security of software and software-based applications for all covered systems. (b) Covered Systems- For purposes of this section, a covered system is any critical information system or weapon system of the Department of Defense, including the following: (1) A major system, as that term is defined in (2) A national security system, as that term is defined in (3) Any Department of Defense information system categorized as Mission Assurance Category I. (4) Any Department of Defense information system categorized as Mission Assurance Category II in accordance with Department of Defense Directive 8500.01E. (c) Elements- The strategy required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) Policy and regulations on the following: (A) Software assurance generally. (B) Contract requirements for software assurance for covered systems in development and production. (C) Inclusion of software assurance in milestone reviews and milestone approvals. (D) Rigorous test and evaluation of software assurance in development, acceptance, and operational tests. (E) Certification and accreditation requirements for software assurance for new systems and for updates for legacy systems, including mechanisms to monitor and enforce reciprocity of certification and accreditation processes among the military departments and Defense Agencies. (F) Remediation in legacy systems of critical software assurance deficiencies that are defined as critical in accordance with the Application Security Technical Implementation Guide of the Defense Information Systems Agency. (2) Allocation of adequate facilities and other resources for test and evaluation and certification and accreditation of software to meet applicable requirements for research and development, systems acquisition, and operations. (3) Mechanisms for protection against compromise of information systems through the supply chain or cyber attack by acquiring and improving automated tools for-- (A) assuring the security of software and software applications during software development; (B) detecting vulnerabilities during testing of software; and (C) detecting intrusions during real-time monitoring of software applications. (4) Mechanisms providing the Department of Defense with the capabilities-- (A) to monitor systems and applications in order to detect and defeat attempts to penetrate or disable such systems and applications; and (B) to ensure that such monitoring capabilities are integrated into the Department of Defense system of cyber defense-in-depth capabilities. (5) An update to Committee for National Security Systems Instruction No. 4009, entitled ‘National Information Assurance Glossary’, to include a standard definition for software security assurance. (6) Either-- (A) mechanisms to ensure that vulnerable Mission Assurance Category III information systems, if penetrated, cannot be used as a foundation for penetration of protected covered systems, and means for assessing the effectiveness of such mechanisms; or (B) plans to address critical vulnerabilities in Mission Assurance Category III information systems to prevent their use for intrusions of Mission Assurance Category I systems and Mission Assurance Category II systems. (7) A funding mechanism for remediation of critical software assurance vulnerabilities in legacy systems. (d) Report- Not later than October 1, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the strategy required by subsection (a). The report shall include the following: (1) A description of the current status of the strategy required by subsection (a) and of the implementation of the strategy, including a description of the role of the strategy in the risk management by the Department regarding the supply chain and in operational planning for cyber security. (2) A description of the risks, if any, that the Department will accept in the strategy due to limitations on funds or other applicable constraints. (a) Strategy Required- The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall develop a strategy to provide for the rapid acquisition of tools, applications, and other capabilities for cyber warfare for the United States Cyber Command and the cyber operations components of the military departments. (b) Basic Elements- The strategy required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An orderly process for determining and approving operational requirements. (2) A well-defined, repeatable, transparent, and disciplined process for developing capabilities to meet such requirements, in accordance with the information technology acquisition process developed pursuant to section 804 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (3) The allocation of facilities and other resources to thoroughly test such capabilities in development, before deployment, and before use in order to validate performance and take into account collateral damage and other so-called second-order effects. (c) Additional Elements- The strategy required by subsection (a) shall also provide for the following: (1) Safeguards to prevent-- (A) the circumvention of operational requirements and acquisition processes through informal relationships among the United States Cyber Command, the Armed Forces, the National Security Agency, and the Defense Information Systems Agency; and (B) the abuse of quick-reaction processes otherwise available for the rapid fielding of capabilities. (2) The establishment of reporting and oversight processes for requirements generation and approval for cyber warfare capabilities, the assignment of responsibility for providing capabilities to meet such requirements, and the execution of development and deployment of such capabilities, under the authority of the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, and other officials in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, as designated in the strategy. (3) The establishment and maintenance of test and evaluation facilities and resources for cyber infrastructure to support research and development, operational test and evaluation, operational planning and effects testing, and training by replicating or emulating networks and infrastructure maintained and operated by the military and political organizations of potential United States adversaries, by domestic and foreign telecommunications service providers, and by the Department of Defense. (4) An organization or organizations within the Department of Defense to be responsible for the operation and maintenance of cyber infrastructure for research, development, test, and evaluation purposes. (5) Appropriate disclosure regarding United States cyber warfare capabilities to the independent test and evaluation community, and the involvement of that community in the development and maintenance of such capabilities, regardless of classification. (6) The role of the private sector and appropriate Department of Defense organizations in developing capabilities to operate in cyberspace, and a clear process for determining whether to allocate responsibility for responding to Department of Defense cyber warfare requirements through Federal Government personnel, contracts with private sector entities, or a combination of both. (7) The roles of each military department, and of the combat support Defense Agencies, in the development of cyber warfare capabilities in support of offensive, defensive, and intelligence operational requirements. (8) Mechanisms to promote information sharing, cooperative agreements, and collaboration with international, interagency, academic, and industrial partners in the development of cyber warfare capabilities. (9) The manner in which the Department of Defense will promote interoperability, share innovation, and avoid unproductive duplication in cyber warfare capabilities through specialization among the components of the Department responsible for developing cyber capabilities. (d) Report on Strategy- (1) REPORT REQUIRED- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the strategy required by subsection (a). The report shall include a comprehensive description of the strategy and plans (including a schedule) for the implementation of the strategy. (2) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED- In this subsection, the term ‘appropriate committees of Congress’ means-- (A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. (a) Report Required- Not later than March 1, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the cyber warfare policy of the Department of Defense. (b) Elements- The report required under this section shall include the following: (1) A description of the policy and legal issues investigated and evaluated by the Department in considering the range of missions and activities that the Department may choose to conduct in cyberspace. (2) The decisions of the Secretary with respect to such issues, and the recommendations of the Secretary to the President for decisions on such of those issues as exceed the authority of the Secretary to resolve, together with the rationale and justification of the Secretary for such decisions and recommendations. (3) A description of the intentions of the Secretary with regard to modifying the National Military Strategy for Cyberspace Operations. (4) The current use of, and potential applications of, modeling and simulation tools to identify likely cybersecurity vulnerabilities, as well as new protective and remediation means, within the Department. (5) The application of modeling and simulation technology to develop strategies and programs to deter hostile or malicious activity intended to compromise Department information systems. (c) Form- The report required under this section shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (a) Reports on Progress Required- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and March 1 every year thereafter through 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the progress of the Department of Defense in defending the Department and the defense industrial base from cyber events (such as attacks, intrusions, and theft). (b) Elements- Each report under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) In the case of the first report, a baseline for measuring the progress of the Department of Defense in defending the Department and the defense industrial base from cyber events, including definitions of significant cyber events, an appropriate categorization of various types of cyber events, the basic methods used in various cyber events, the vulnerabilities exploited in such cyber events, and the metrics to be utilized to determine whether the Department is or is not making progress against an evolving cyber threat. (2) An ongoing assessment of such baseline against key cyber defense strategies (described in subsection (c)) to determine implementation progress. (B) For any such event that has been investigated by or on behalf of the Damage Assessment Management Office, a synopsis of each damage assessment report, with emphasis on actions needing remediation. (4) A comparative assessment of the offensive cyber warfare capabilities of current representative potential United States adversaries and nations with advanced cyber warfare capabilities with the capacity of the United States to defend-- (A) military networks and mission capabilities; and (B) critical infrastructure. (5) A comparative assessment of the offensive cyber warfare capabilities of the United States with the capacity of current representative potential United States adversaries and nations with advanced cyber warfare capabilities to defend against cyber attacks. (6) A comparative assessment of the degree of dependency of current representative potential United States adversaries, nations with advanced cyber warfare capabilities, and the United States on networks that can be attacked through cyberspace. (7) A description of known or suspected identified supply chain vulnerabilities, including known or suspected supply chain attacks, and actions to remediate such vulnerabilities. (c) Key Cyber Defense Strategies- For purposes of subsection (b)(2), key cyber defense strategies include the following: (1) Relevant valid Homeland Security Presidential Directives and National Security Presidential Directives. (2) The Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative. (3) The National Military Strategy for Cyberspace Operations implementation plan. (d) Performance of Certain Assessments- The comparative assessment of critical infrastructure required by subsection (b)(4)(B) shall be performed by the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of other agencies of the Government with specific responsibility for critical infrastructure. (e) Form- Each report under this section shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. Subtitle E--Other Matters (a) Extension of Waiver- Paragraph (1) of section 941(b) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( (b) Annual Report- Paragraph (3) of such section is amended by striking ‘in 2010 and 2011’ and inserting ‘in each year through 2013’. (a) Additional Activities Considered- As part of the quadrennial roles and missions review conducted in 2011 pursuant to (1) Information operations. (2) Detention and interrogation. (b) Additional Report Requirement- In the report required by section 118b(d) of such title for such review in 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall-- (1) provide clear guidance on the nature and extent of which core competencies are associated with the activities listed in subsection (a); and (2) identify the elements of the Department of Defense that are responsible or should be responsible for providing such core competencies. (a) Report Required- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the organizational structure and policy guidance of the Department of Defense with respect to information operations. (b) Review- In preparing the report required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall review the following: (1) The extent to which the current definition of ‘information operations’ in Department of Defense Directive 3600.1 is appropriate. (2) The location of the office within the Department of the lead official responsible for information operations of the Department, including assessments of the most effective location and the need to designate a principal staff assistant to the Secretary of Defense for information operations. (3) Departmental responsibility for the development, coordination, and oversight of Department policy on information operations and for the integration of such operations. (4) Departmental responsibility for the planning, execution, and oversight of Department information operations. (5) Departmental responsibility for coordination within the Department, and between the Department and other departments and agencies of the Federal Government, regarding Department information operations, and for the resolution of conflicts in the discharge of such operations, including an assessment of current coordination bodies and decisionmaking processes. (6) The roles and responsibilities of the military departments, combat support agencies, the United States Special Operations Command, and the other combatant commands in the development and implementation of information operations. (7) The roles and responsibilities of the defense intelligence agencies for support of information operations. (8) The role in information operations of the following Department officials: (A) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs. (B) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict. (C) The senior official responsible for information processing and networking capabilities. (9) The role of related capabilities in the discharge of information operations, including public affairs capabilities, civil-military operations capabilities, defense support of public diplomacy, and intelligence. (10) The management structure of computer network operations in the Department for the discharge of information operations, and the policy in support of that component. (11) The appropriate use, management, and oversight of contractors in the development and implementation of information operations, including an assessment of current guidance and policy directives pertaining to the uses of contractors for these purposes. (c) Form- The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, with a classified annex, if necessary. (d) Department of Defense Directive- Upon the submittal of the report required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall prescribe a revised directive for the Department of Defense on information operations. The directive shall take into account the results of the review conducted for purposes of the report. (e) Information Operations Defined- In this section, the term ‘information operations’ means the information operations specified in Department of Defense Directive 3600.1, as follows: (1) Electronic warfare. (2) Computer network operations. (3) Psychological operations. (4) Military deception. (5) Operations security. (a) Report Required- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the organizational structures of the headquarters of the geographic combatant commands. (b) Elements- The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following; (1) A description of the organizational structure of the headquarters of each geographic combatant command. (2) An assessment of the benefits and limitations of the different organizational structures in meeting the broad range of military missions of the geographic combatant commands. (3) A description and assessment of the role and contributions of other departments and agencies of the Federal Government within each organizational structure, including a description of any plans to expand interagency participation in the geographic combatant commands in the future. (4) A description of any lessons learned from the ongoing reorganization of the organizational structure of the United States Southern Command and the United States Africa Command, including an assessment of the value, if any, added by the position of civilian deputy to the commander of the United States Southern Command and to the commander of the United States Africa Command. (5) Any other matters the Secretary and the Chairman consider appropriate. TITLE X--GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 1001. General transfer authority. Sec. 1002. Authorization of additional appropriations for operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Haiti for fiscal year 2010. Sec. 1003. Budgetary effects of this Act. Sec. 1011. Unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia. Sec. 1012. Extension and modification of joint task forces support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities. Sec. 1013. Reporting requirement on expenditures to support foreign counter-drug activities. Sec. 1014. Support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments. Sec. 1015. Notice to Congress on military construction projects for facilities of the Department of Defense and foreign law enforcement agencies for counter-drug activities. Sec. 1021. Extension of authority for reimbursement of expenses for certain Navy mess operations. Sec. 1022. Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the naming of a naval combat vessel after Father Vincent Capodanno. Sec. 1023. Requirements for long-range plan for construction of naval vessels. Sec. 1031. Extension of certain authority for making rewards for combating terrorism. Sec. 1032. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Sec. 1033. Certification requirements relating to the transfer of individuals detained at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to foreign countries and other foreign entities. Sec. 1034. Prohibition on the use of funds to modify or construct facilities in the United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Sec. 1035. Comprehensive review of force protection policies. Sec. 1041. Limitation on deactivation of existing Consequence Management Response Forces. Sec. 1051. Interagency national security knowledge and skills. Sec. 1052. Report on establishing a Northeast Regional Joint Training Center. Sec. 1053. Comptroller General report on previously requested reports. Sec. 1054. Biennial report on nuclear triad. Sec. 1055. Comptroller General study on common alignment of world regions in departments and agencies with international responsibilities. Sec. 1056. Required reports concerning bomber modernization, sustainment, and recapitalization efforts in support of the national defense strategy. Sec. 1057. Comptroller General study and recommendations regarding security of southern land border of the United States. Sec. 1061. Public availability of Department of Defense reports required by law. Sec. 1062. Prohibition on infringing on the individual right to lawfully acquire, possess, own, carry, and otherwise use privately owned firearms, ammunition, and other weapons. Sec. 1063. Development of criteria and methodology for determining the safety and security of nuclear weapons. Sec. 1071. National Defense Panel. Sec. 1072. Sale of surplus military equipment to State and local homeland security and emergency management agencies. Sec. 1073. Defense research and development rapid innovation program. Sec. 1074. Authority to make excess nonlethal supplies available for domestic emergency assistance. Sec. 1075. Technical and clerical amendments. Sec. 1076. Study on optimal balance of manned and remotely piloted aircraft. Sec. 1077. Treatment of successor contingency operation to Operation Iraqi Freedom. Sec. 1078. Program to assess the utility of non-lethal weapons. Sec. 1079. Sense of Congress on strategic nuclear force reductions. Subtitle A--Financial Matters (a) Authority to Transfer Authorizations- (1) AUTHORITY- Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal year 2011 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. (2) LIMITATION- Except as provided in paragraph (3), the total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed $4,000,000,000. (3) EXCEPTION FOR TRANSFERS BETWEEN MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS- A transfer of funds between military personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2). (b) Limitations- The authority provided by this section to transfer authorizations-- (1) may only be used to provide authority for items that have a higher priority than the items from which authority is transferred; and (2) may not be used to provide authority for an item that has been denied authorization by Congress. (c) Effect on Authorization Amounts- A transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred. (d) Notice to Congress- The Secretary shall promptly notify Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a). In addition to the amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated by this division, the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2010 in title XV of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (1) The amounts provided in sections 1502 through 1507 of such Act for the following procurement accounts are increased as follows: (A) For aircraft procurement, Army, by $182,170,000. (B) For weapons and tracked combat vehicles procurement, Army, by $3,000,000. (C) For ammunition procurement, Army, by $17,055,000. (D) For other procurement, Army, by $1,997,918,000. (E) For the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund, by $400,000,000. (F) For aircraft procurement, Navy, by $104,693,000. (G) For other procurement, Navy, by $15,000,000. (H) For procurement, Marine Corps, by $18,927,000. (I) For aircraft procurement, Air Force, by $209,766,000. (J) For ammunition procurement, Air Force, by $5,000,000. (K) For other procurement, Air Force, by $576,895,000. (L) For the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle Fund, by $1,123,000,000. (M) For defense-wide activities, by $189,276,000. (2) The amounts provided in section 1508 of such Act for research, development, test, and evaluation are increased as follows: (A) For the Army, by $61,962,000. (B) For the Navy, by $5,360,000. (C) For the Air Force, by $187,651,000. (D) For defense-wide activities, by $22,138,000. (3) The amounts provided in sections 1509, 1511, 1513, 1514, and 1515 of such Act for operation and maintenance are increased as follows: (A) For the Army, by $11,700,965,000. (B) For the Navy, by $2,428,702,000. (C) For the Marine Corps, by $1,090,873,000. (D) For the Air Force, by $3,845,047,000. (E) For defense-wide activities, by $1,188,421,000. (F) For the Army Reserve, by $67,399,000. (G) For the Navy Reserve, by $61,842,000. (H) For the Marine Corps Reserve, by $674,000. (I) For the Air Force Reserve, by $95,819,000. (J) For the Army National Guard, by $171,834,000. (K) For the Air National Guard, by $161,281,000. (L) For the Defense Health Program, by $33,367,000. (M) For Drug Interdiction and Counterdrug Activities, Defense-wide, by $94,000,000. (N) For the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund, by $2,604,000,000. (O) For the Iraq Security Forces Fund, by $1,000,000,000. (P) For Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid, by $255,000,000. (Q) For Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Fund, by $350,000,000. (R) For Working Capital Funds, by $974,967,000. (4) The amount provided in section 1512 of such Act for military personnel accounts is increased by $1,895,761,000. The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled ‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the House of Representatives, as long as such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage of this Act. Subtitle B--Counter-Drug Activities Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 ( (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘2010’ and inserting ‘2011’; and (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘2010’ and inserting ‘2011’. (a) Extension- Subsection (b) of section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 ( (b) Availability of Authority- (1) ADDITIONAL CONDITION ON AUTHORITY FOR SUPPORT AND ASSOCIATED WAIVER AUTHORITY- Subsection (d) of such section is amended-- (A) by inserting ‘(1)’ before ‘Any support’; and (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(2)(A) Support for counter-terrorism activities provided under subsection (a) may only be provided if the Secretary of Defense determines that the objectives of using the counter-drug funds of any joint task force to provide such support relate significantly to the objectives of providing support for counter-drug activities by that joint task force or any other joint task force. ‘(B) The Secretary of Defense may waive the requirements of subparagraph (A) if the Secretary determines that such a waiver is vital to the national security interests of the United States. The Secretary shall promptly submit to Congress notice in writing of any waiver issued under this subparagraph. ‘(C) The Secretary of Defense may delegate any responsibility of the Secretary under subparagraph (B) to the Deputy Secretary of Defense or to the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. Except as provided in the preceding sentence, such a responsibility may not be delegated to any official of the Department of Defense or any other official.’. (2) ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE- Subsection (c) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(4) A certification by the Secretary of Defense that any support provided under subsection (a) during such one-year period was provided in compliance with the requirements of subsection (d).’. (3) INTERIM COMPLIANCE REPORT- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report setting forth-- (A) a description of each support activity provided by a joint task force under subsection (a) of section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 ( (B) a certification as to whether or not each such activity has been provided in compliance with the requirements of subsection (d) of such section, as amended by paragraph (1) of this subsection. Section 1022(a) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by (a) In General- Subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 ( (b) Maximum Amount of Support- Subsection (e)(2) of such section is amended by striking ‘either of fiscal years 2009 and 2010’ and inserting ‘any of the fiscal years 2009 through 2012’. (a) Notice to Congress- (1) NOTICE- Section 1004 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 ( (A) in subsection (b)(4), by inserting ‘for the purpose of facilitating’ after ‘within or outside the United States or’; and (B) in subsection (h)(2)(A)-- (i) by striking ‘modification or repair’ and inserting ‘construction, modification, or repair’; (ii) by striking ‘a Department of Defense facility’ and inserting ‘any facility’; and (iii) by striking ‘purpose’ and inserting ‘purposes’. (2) CONSTRUCTION OF NOTICE- Subsection (h) of such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(3) This subsection may not be construed as an authorization for the use of funds for any military construction project that would exceed the approved cost limitations of an unspecified minor military construction project under (b) Effective Date- The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to facilities projects for which a decision is made to be carried out on or after that date. Subtitle C--Naval Vessels and Shipyards (a) Extension- Subsection (b) of section 1014 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( (b) Clarification of Scope of Authority- Subsection (a) of such section is amended by inserting ‘in any fiscal year’ after ‘may be used’. (a) Findings- Congress makes the following findings: (1) Father Vincent Capodanno was born on February 13, 1929, in Staten Island, New York. (2) After attending Fordham University for a year, he entered the Maryknoll Missionary Seminary in upstate New York in 1949, and was ordained a Catholic priest in June 1957. (3) Father Capodanno’s first assignment as a missionary was working with aboriginal Taiwanese people in the mountains of Taiwan where he served in a parish and later in a school. After several years, Father Capodanno returned to the United States for leave and then was assigned to a Maryknoll school in Hong Kong. (4) Father Vincent Capodanno volunteered as a Navy Chaplain and was commissioned a Lieutenant in the Chaplain Corps of the United States Naval Reserve in December 28, 1965. (5) Father Vincent Capodanno selflessly extended his combat tour in Vietnam on the condition he was allowed to remain with the infantry. (6) On September 4, 1967, during a fierce battle in the Thang Binh District of the Que-Son Valley in Vietnam, Father Capodanno went among the wounded and dying, giving last rites and caring for the injured. He was killed that day while taking care of his Marines. (7) On January 7, 1969, Father Vincent Capodanno was awarded the Medal of Honor posthumously for comforting the wounded and dying during the Vietnam conflict. For his dedicated service, Father Capodanno was also awarded the Bronze Star, the Purple Heart, the Presidential Unit Citation, the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm, and the Vietnam Campaign Medal. (8) In his memory, the U.S.S. Capodanno was commissioned on September 17, 1973. It is the only Naval vessel to date to have received a Papal blessing by Pope John Paul II in Naples, Italy, on September 4, 1981. (9) The U.S.S. Capodanno was decommissioned on July 30, 1993. (b) Sense of Congress- It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Navy should name a combat vessel of the United States Navy the ‘U.S.S. Father Vincent Capodanno’, in honor of Father Vincent Capodanno, a lieutenant in the Navy Chaplain Corps. (a) In General- ‘(a) Quadrennial Naval Vessel Construction Plan- At the same time that the budget of the President is submitted under section 1105(a) of title 31 during each year in which the Secretary of Defense submits a quadrennial defense review, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a long-range plan for the construction of combatant and support vessels for the Navy that supports the force structure recommendations of the quadrennial defense review. ‘(b) Matters Included- The plan under subsection (a) shall include the following: ‘(1) A detailed construction schedule of naval vessels for the 10-year period beginning on the date on which the plan is submitted, including a certification by the Secretary that the budget for the fiscal year in which the plan is submitted and the budget for the future-years defense program submitted under section 221 of this title are sufficient for funding such schedule. ‘(2) A probable construction schedule for the 10-year period beginning on the date that is 10 years after the date on which the plan is submitted. ‘(3) A notional construction schedule for the 10-year period beginning on the date that is 20 years after the date on which the plan is submitted. ‘(4) The estimated levels of annual funding necessary to carry out the construction schedules under paragraphs (1), (2), and (3). ‘(5) For the construction schedules under paragraphs (1) and (2)-- ‘(A) a determination by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation of the level of funding necessary to execute such schedules; and ‘(B) an evaluation by the Director of the potential risk associated with such schedules, including detailed effects on operational plans, missions, deployment schedules, and fulfillment of the requirements of the combatant commanders. ‘(c) Naval Composition- In submitting the plan under subsection (a), the Secretary shall ensure that such plan is in accordance with section 5062(b) of this title. ‘(d) Assessment When Budget Is Insufficient- If the budget for a fiscal year provides for funding of the construction of naval vessels at a level that is less than the level determined necessary by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation under subsection (b)(5), the Secretary of the Navy shall include with the defense budget materials for that fiscal year an assessment that describes and discusses the risks associated with the budget, including the risk associated with a reduced force structure that may result from funding naval vessel construction at such a level. ‘(e) CBO Evaluation- Not later than 60 days after the date on which the congressional defense committees receive the plan under subsection (a), the Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall submit to such committees a report assessing the sufficiency of the estimated levels of annual funding included in such plan with respect to the budget submitted during the year in which the plan is submitted and the future-years defense program submitted under section 221 of this title. ‘(f) Changes to the Construction Plan- In any year in which a quadrennial defense review is not submitted and the budget of the President submitted under section 1105(a) of title 31 decreases the number of vessels requested in the future-years defense program submitted under section 221 of this title, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on such decrease including-- ‘(1) an addendum to the most recent quadrennial defense review that fully explains and justifies the decrease with respect to the national security strategy of the United States as set forth in the most recent national security strategy report of the President under section 108 of the National Security Act of 1947 ( ‘(2) a description of the additional reviews and analyses considered by the Secretary after the previous quadrennial defense review was submitted that justify the decrease. ‘(g) Definitions- In this section: ‘(1) The term ‘budget’, with respect to a fiscal year, means the budget for that fiscal year that is submitted to Congress by the President under section 1105(a) of title 31. ‘(2) The term ‘defense budget materials’, with respect to a fiscal year, means the materials submitted to Congress by the Secretary of Defense in support of the budget for that fiscal year. ‘(3) The term ‘quadrennial defense review’ means the review of the defense programs and policies of the United States that is carried out every four years under section 118 of this title.’. (b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 9 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 231 and inserting the following new item: ‘231. Long-range plan for construction of naval vessels.’. Subtitle D--Counterterrorism None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2011 may be used to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release to or within the United States, its territories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other detainee who-- (1) is not a United States citizen or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and (2) is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department of Defense. (a) Limitation- (1) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in paragraph (2), during the one-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense may not use any of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise available to the Department of Defense to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or effective control of the individual’s country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity unless the Secretary submits to Congress the certification described in subsection (b) by not later than 30 days before the transfer of the individual. (2) EXCEPTION- Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to effectuate an order affecting the disposition of the individual that is issued by a court or competent tribunal of the United States having lawful jurisdiction. The Secretary shall notify Congress promptly upon issuance of any such order. (b) Certification- The certification described in this subsection is a written certification made by the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, that the government of the foreign country or the recognized leadership of the foreign entity to which the individual detained at Guantanamo is to be transferred-- (1) is not a designated state sponsor of terrorism or a designated foreign terrorist organization; (2) maintains effective control over each detention facility in which an individual is to be detained if the individual is to be housed in a detention facility; (3) is not, as of the date of the certification, facing a threat that is likely to substantially affect its ability to exercise control over the individual; (4) has agreed to take effective steps to ensure that the individual cannot take action to threaten the United States, its citizens, or its allies in the future; (5) has taken such steps as the Secretary determines are necessary to ensure that the individual cannot engage or re-engage in any terrorist activity; and (6) has agreed to share any information with the United States that-- (A) is related to the individual or any associates of the individual; and (B) could affect the security of the United States, its citizens, or its allies. (c) Prohibition and Waiver in Cases of Prior Confirmed Recidivism- (1) PROHIBITION- Except as provided in paragraph (3), during the one-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense may not use any amount authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or effective control of the individual’s country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity if there is a confirmed case of any individual who was detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, at any time after September 11, 2001, who was transferred to the foreign country or entity and subsequently engaged in any terrorist activity. (2) WAIVER- The Secretary of Defense may waive the prohibition in paragraph (1) if the Secretary determines that such a transfer is in the national security interests of the United States and includes, as part of the certification described in subsection (b) relating to such transfer, the determination of the Secretary under this paragraph. (3) EXCEPTION- Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to effectuate an order affecting the disposition of the individual that is issued by a court or competent tribunal of the United States having lawful jurisdiction. The Secretary shall notify Congress promptly upon issuance of any such order. (d) Definitions- For the purposes of this section: (1) The term ‘individual detained at Guantanamo’ means any individual who is located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who-- (A) is not a citizen of the United States or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and (B) is-- (i) in the custody or under the effective control of the Department of Defense; or (ii) otherwise under detention at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. (2) The term ‘foreign terrorist organization’ means any organization so designated by the Secretary of State under section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act ( (a) In General- None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used to construct or modify any facility in the United States, its territories, or possessions to house any individual described in subsection (c) for the purposes of detention or imprisonment in the custody or under the effective control of the Department of Defense. (b) Exception- The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to any modification of facilities at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. (c) Individuals Described- An individual described in this subsection is any individual who, as of October 1, 2009, is located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and who-- (1) is not a citizen of the United States or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and (2) is-- (A) in the custody or under the effective control of the Department of Defense; or (B) otherwise under detention at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. (d) Report on Use of Facilities in the United States to House Detainees Transferred From Guantanamo- (1) REPORT REQUIRED- Not later than April 1, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report, in classified or unclassified form, on the merits, costs, and risks of using any proposed facility in the United States, its territories, or possessions to house any individual described in subsection (c) for the purposes of detention or imprisonment in the custody or under the effective control of the Department of Defense. (2) ELEMENTS OF THE REPORT- The report required in paragraph (1) shall include each of the following: (A) A discussion of the merits associated with any such proposed facility that would justify-- (i) using the facility instead of the facility at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; and (ii) the proposed facility’s contribution to effecting a comprehensive policy for continuing military detention operations. (B) The rationale for selecting the specific site for any such proposed facility, including details for the processes and criteria used for identifying the merits described in subparagraph (A) and for selecting the proposed site over reasonable alternative sites. (C) A discussion of any potential risks to any community in the vicinity of any such proposed facility, the measures that could be taken to mitigate such risks, and the likely cost to the Department of Defense of implementing such measures. (D) A discussion of any necessary modifications to any such proposed facility to ensure that any detainee transferred from Guantanamo Bay to such facility could not come into contact with any other individual, including any other person detained at such facility, that is not approved for such contact by the Department of Defense, and an assessment of the likely costs of such modifications. (E) A discussion of any support at the site of any such proposed facility that would likely be provided by the Department of Defense, including the types of support, the number of personnel required for each such type, and an estimate of the cost of such support. (F) A discussion of any support, other than support provided at a proposed facility, that would likely be provided by the Department of Defense for the operation of any such proposed facility, including the types of possible support, the number of personnel required for each such type, and an estimate of the cost of such support. (G) A discussion of the legal issues, in the judgment of the Secretary of Defense, that could be raised as a result of detaining or imprisoning any individual described in subsection (c) at any such proposed facility that could not be raised while such individual is detained or imprisoned at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. (a) Comprehensive Review Required- The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a comprehensive review of Department of Defense policies, regulations, instructions, and directives pertaining to force protection within the Department. (b) Matters Covered- The review required under subsection (a) shall include an assessment of each of the following: (1) Information sharing practices across the Department of Defense, and among the State, local, and Federal partners of the Department of Defense. (2) Antiterrorism and force protection standards relating to buildings, including standoff distances. (3) Protective standards relating to chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high explosives threats. (4) Standards relating to access to Department bases. (5) Standards for identity management within the Department, including such standards for identity cards and biometric identifications systems. (6) Procedures for validating and approving individuals with regular or episodic access to military installations, including military personnel, civilian employees, contractors, family members of personnel, and other types of visitors. (7) Procedures for sharing with appropriate Department of Defense officials with responsibility for force protection-- (A) information from the intelligence or law enforcement community regarding possible threats from terrorists or terrorist groups, criminal organizations, or other state and non-state foreign entities actively working to undermine the security interests of the United States; and (B) information regarding personnel who have engaged in potentially suspicious activities or may otherwise pose a threat. (8) Any legislative changes recommended for implementing the recommendations contained in the review. (c) Interim Report- Not later than September 1, 2012, the Secretary of Defense shall submit an interim report on the comprehensive review required under subsection (a). (d) Final Report- Not later than March 1, 2013, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a final report on the comprehensive review required under subsection (a). The final report shall include such findings and recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate based on the review, including recommended actions to be taken to implement the specific recommendations in the final report. The final report shall be submitted in an unclassified format, but may include a classified annex. Subtitle E--Homeland Defense and Civil Support (a) Limitation- The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that no Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, or High-Yield Explosive Consequence Management Response Force established as of October 1, 2009, is deactivated or disestablished until the Secretary provides a certification described in subsection (b). (b) Certification- The certification described in this subsection is a written certification to the congressional defense committees that there exists within the United States Armed Forces an alternative chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or high-yield explosive consequence management response capability that is at least as capable as two Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, or High-Yield Explosive Consequence Management Response Forces. (c) Report Required- (1) IN GENERAL- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on plans of the Department of Defense to establish Homeland Response Forces for domestic emergency response to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction. (2) ELEMENTS OF REPORT- The report required by this subsection shall include the following: (A) A detailed description of the analysis that led to the decision to establish Homeland Response Forces described in paragraph (1), including-- (i) whether consideration was given to establishing Homeland Response Forces within the Reserves; and (ii) the reasons for not planning to establish any Homeland Response Forces within the Reserves. (B) A detailed description of the plans to establish Homeland Response Forces, including-- (i) the cost and schedule to establish, equip, maintain, and operate the proposed Homeland Response Forces; (ii) guidelines for the employment of Homeland Response Forces; and (iii) the portion of the costs of Homeland Response Forces that will be borne by the States. (C) A detailed description of the proposed number and composition of Homeland Response Forces, including-- (i) the number and type of units in each Homeland Response Force; and (ii) the number of personnel in each Homeland Response Force. (D) A comparative assessment of the emergency response capabilities of a Homeland Response Force with the capabilities of a Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, or High-Yield Explosive Consequence Management Response Force, including-- (i) a comparison of the equipment proposed for each type of force; (ii) a comparison of the proposed means of transportation for each type of force; (iii) an estimate of the time it would take each type of force to deploy to an incident site; and (iv) an estimate of the operational duration of each type of force at such a site. (E) A description of the command and control arrangements proposed for the Homeland Response Forces, including a description of the degree to which the Homeland Response Forces would be subject to the direction and control of the Department of Defense, as compared to the Governor of the State in which they are located. (F) The results of the United States Northern Command study of the possible concepts of operations and of the implementation of the Homeland Response Force plan in such a manner as to provide adequate capability to provide Federal defense support to civil authorities during domestic incidents involving weapons of mass destruction. (G) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate. (3) FORM OF REPORT- The report required by this subsection shall be in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. Subtitle F--Studies and Reports (a) Study Required- (1) SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT STUDY ORGANIZATION- Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall select and enter into an agreement with an appropriate independent, nonprofit organization to conduct a study of the matters described in subsection (b). (2) QUALIFICATIONS OF ORGANIZATION SELECTED- The organization selected shall be qualified on the basis of having relevant expertise in the fields of national security and human capital development, and on the basis of such other criteria as the Secretary of Defense may determine. (b) Matters to Be Covered- The study required by subsection (a) shall assess the current state of interagency national security knowledge and skills in Department of Defense civilian and military personnel, and make recommendations for strengthening such knowledge and skills. At minimum, the study shall include assessments and recommendations on-- (1) interagency national security training, education, and rotational assignment opportunities available to civilians and military personnel; (2) integration of interagency national security education into the professional military education system; (3) levels of interagency national security knowledge and skills possessed by personnel currently serving in civilian executive and general or flag officer positions, as represented by the interagency education, training, and professional experiences they have undertaken; (4) incentives that enable and encourage military and civilian personnel to undertake interagency assignment, education, and training opportunities, as well as disincentives and obstacles that discourage undertaking such opportunities; and (5) any plans or current efforts to improve the interagency national security knowledge and skills of civilian and military personnel. (c) Report- Not later than December 1, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the findings and recommendations from the study required by subsection (a). (d) Definition- In this section, the term ‘interagency national security knowledge and skills’ means an understanding of, and the ability to efficiently and expeditiously work within, the structures, mechanisms, and processes by which the departments, agencies, and elements of the Federal Government that have national security missions coordinate and integrate their policies, capabilities, budgets, expertise, and activities to accomplish such missions. (a) Report Required- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the need for the establishment of a Northeast Regional Joint Training Center. (b) Contents of Report- The report required under subsection (a) shall include each of the following: (1) A list of facilities in the Northeastern United States at which, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, the Department of Defense has deployed or has committed to deploying joint training. (2) A description of the extent to which such facilities have sufficient unused capacity and expertise to accommodate and fully utilize joint training. (3) A list of potential locations for the Northeast Regional Joint Training Center discussed in the report. (c) Considerations With Respect to Location- In determining potential locations for the Northeast Regional Joint Training Center to be discussed in the report required under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall take into consideration Department of Defense facilities that have-- (1) a workforce of skilled personnel; (2) live, virtual, and constructive training capabilities, and the ability to digitally connect them and the associated battle command structure at the tactical and operational levels; (3) an extensive deployment history in Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom; (4) a location in the Northeastern United States; (5) the capacity or potential capacity to accommodate a target training audience range of 500 to 4,000 additional personnel; and (6) the capability to accommodate the training of current and future joint forces. (a) Report Required- Not later than March 1, 2011, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report evaluating the sufficiency, adequacy, and conclusions of the following reports: (1) The report on Air Force fighter force shortfalls, as required by the report of the House of Representatives numbered 111-166, which accompanied the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (2) The report on procurement of 4.5 generation fighters, as required by section 131 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (3) The report on combat air forces restructuring, as required by the report of the House of Representatives numbered 111-288, which accompanied the conference report for the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (b) Matters Covered by Report- The report required by subsection (a) shall examine the potential costs and benefits of each of the following: (1) The service life extension program costs to sustain the legacy fighter fleet to meet inventory requirements with an emphasis on the service life extension program compared to other options such as procurement of 4.5 generation fighters. (2) The Falcon Structural Augmentation Roadmap of F-16s, with emphasis on the cost-benefit of such effort and the effect of such efforts on the service life of the airframes. (3) Any additional programs designed to extend the service life of legacy fighter aircraft. (c) Prohibition- No fighter aircraft may be retired from the Air Force or the Air National Guard inventory in fiscal year 2011 until the date that is 90 days after the date on which the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives receive the report required under subsection (a). (a) Report- Not later than March 1 of each even-numbered year, beginning March 1, 2012, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Administrator for Nuclear Security, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the nuclear triad. (b) Matters Included- The report under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A detailed discussion of the modernization and sustainment plans for each component of the nuclear triad over the 10-year period beginning on the date of the report. (2) The funding required for each platform of the nuclear triad with respect to operation and maintenance, modernization, and replacement. (3) Any industrial capacities that the Secretary considers vital to ensure the viability of the nuclear triad. (c) Nuclear Triad Defined- In this section, the term ‘nuclear triad’ means the nuclear deterrent capabilities of the United States composed of ballistic missile submarines, land-based missiles, and strategic bombers. (a) Study Required- The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study to assess the need for and implications of a common alignment of world regions in the internal organization of departments and agencies of the Federal Government with international responsibilities. (b) Departments and Agencies- The following departments and agencies, at a minimum, shall be included in the study: (1) The Department of State. (2) The Department of the Treasury. (3) The Department of Defense. (4) The Department of Justice. (5) The Department of Commerce. (6) The Department of Homeland Security. (7) The United States Agency for International Development. (8) The agencies comprising the intelligence community. (9) Such other departments, agencies, and Federal organizations with significant international responsibilities as the Comptroller General considers appropriate. (c) Cooperation and Access- The heads of the departments and agencies included in the study shall provide full cooperation with, and access to appropriate information on organizational structures to, the Comptroller General for the purposes of conducting the study. (d) Matters Covered- The study required under subsection (a) shall, at a minimum, assess-- (1) problems and inefficiencies resulting from lack of a common alignment, including impediments to interagency collaboration; (2) obstacles to implementing a common alignment; (3) advantages and disadvantages of a common alignment; and (4) measures taken to address challenges associated with the lack of a common alignment. (e) Report- The Comptroller General shall submit to Congress a report on the study required under subsection (a) not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (a) Air Force Report- (1) REPORT REQUIRED- Not later than 360 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes-- (A) a discussion of the cost, schedule, and performance of all planned efforts to modernize and keep viable the existing B-1, B-2, and B-52 bomber fleets and a discussion of the forecasted service-life and all sustainment challenges that the Secretary of the Air Force may confront in keeping those platforms viable until the anticipated retirement of such aircraft; (B) a discussion, presented in a comparison and contrast type format, of the scope of the 2007 Next-Generation Long Range Strike Analysis of Alternatives guidance and subsequent Analysis of Alternatives report tasked by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics in the September 11, 2006, Acquisition Decision Memorandum, as compared to the scope and directed guidance of the year 2010 Long Range Strike Study effort currently being conducted by the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and the Office of the Secretary of Defense’s Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation Office; and (C) a discussion of the preliminary costs, any development, testing, fielding and operational employment challenges, capability gaps, limitations, and shortfalls of the Secretary of Defense’s plan to field a long-range, penetrating, survivable, persistent and enduring ‘family of systems’ as compared to the preliminary costs, any development, testing, fielding, and operational employment of a singular platform that encompasses all the required aforementioned characteristics. (2) PREPARATION OF REPORT- The report under paragraph (1) shall be prepared by a federally funded research and development center selected by the Secretary of the Air Force and submitted to the Secretary for submittal by the Secretary in accordance with that paragraph. (b) Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation Report- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation of the Office of the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes-- (1) the assumptions and estimated life-cycle costs of the Department’s long-range, penetrating, survivable, persistent, and enduring ‘family of systems’ platforms; and (2) the assumptions and estimated life-cycle costs of the Next Generation Platform program, as planned, prior to the cancellation of the program on April 6, 2009. (a) Study and Report Required- The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study of the security of the southern land border of the United States and ongoing United States Government efforts to improve such security. Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the findings of the study and such recommendations based on such findings as the Comptroller General considers to be appropriate. (b) Issues Addressed- The study and report required by subsection (a) shall address, at a minimum, the following issues: (1) The extent to which the United States has or has not achieved and maintained operational control over the southern land border of the United States, as defined in section 2(b) of the Secure Fence Act of 2006 ( (2) The extent to which any lack of operational control over the southern land border of the United States has resulted in the operation of illicit networks trafficking in people, drugs, illegal weapons and money, violence associated with such illegal activities, and other impacts adverse to the interests of the United States. (3) The costs and benefits of steps, including but not limited to the steps identified in subsection (c), that could be taken by elements of the United States Government to achieve operational control over the southern land border of the United States. (4) The costs and benefits of an increased role for the Department of Defense in taking any such steps. (5) The adequacy of current information sharing agreements and other related agreements between Federal, State, local, and tribal law enforcement authorities with regard to the security of the southern land border of the United States. (6) The impact of any increased deployment of unmanned aerial systems or unmanned aircraft on the use and availability of the National Airspace in the area of the southern land border of the United States. (c) Specific Steps to Be Considered- The steps to be considered by the Comptroller General pursuant to paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (b) shall include the following: (1) The deployment of additional units or members of the National Guard or other Department of Defense personnel to the southern land border of the United States. (2) The commitment of additional border patrol agents or other civilian law enforcement personnel to the southern land border of the United States. (3) The construction of additional fencing, including double-layer and triple-layer fencing. (4) The increased use of ground-based mobile surveillance systems by military or civilian personnel. (5) The deployment of additional unmanned aerial systems and manned aircraft to provide surveillance of the southern land border of the United States. (6) The deployment and provision of capability for radio communications interoperability between U.S. Customs and Border Protection and State, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies. (7) The construction of checkpoints along the southern land border of the United States. (8) The use of additional mobile patrols by military or civilian personnel, particularly in rural, high-trafficked areas, as designated by the Commissioner of Customs and Border Protection. Subtitle G--Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations (a) Public Availability- (1) IN GENERAL- Chapter 3 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 122 the following new section: ‘(a) In General- The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each report described in subsection (b) is made available to the public, upon request submitted on or after the date on which such report is submitted to Congress, through the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs. ‘(b) Covered Reports- (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), a report described in this subsection is any report that is required by law to be submitted to Congress by the Secretary of Defense, or by any element of the Department of Defense. ‘(2) A report otherwise described in paragraph (1) is not a report described in this subsection if the report contains-- ‘(A) classified information; ‘(B) proprietary information; ‘(C) information that is exempt from disclosure under section 552 of title 5 (commonly referred to as the ‘Freedom of Information Act’); or ‘(D) any other type of information that the Secretary of Defense determines should not be made available to the public in the interest of national security.’. (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 122 the following new item: ‘122a. Public availability of Department of Defense reports required by law.’. (b) Effective Date- (a) In General- Except as provided in subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense shall not prohibit, issue any requirement relating to, or collect or record any information relating to the otherwise lawful acquisition, possession, ownership, carrying, or other use of a privately owned firearm, privately owned ammunition, or another privately owned weapon by a member of the Armed Forces or civilian employee of the Department of Defense on property that is not-- (1) a military installation; or (2) any other property that is owned or operated by the Department of Defense. (b) Existing Regulations and Records- (1) REGULATIONS- Any regulation promulgated before the date of enactment of this Act shall have no force or effect to the extent that it requires conduct prohibited by this section. (2) RECORDS- Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall destroy any record containing information described in subsection (a) that was collected before the date of enactment of this Act. (c) Rule of Construction- Subsection (a) shall not be construed to limit the authority of the Secretary of Defense to-- (1) create or maintain records relating to, or regulate the possession, carrying, or other use of a firearm, ammunition, or other weapon by a member of the Armed Forces or civilian employee of the Department of Defense while-- (A) engaged in official duties on behalf of the Department of Defense; or (B) wearing the uniform of an Armed Force; or (2) create or maintain records relating to an investigation, prosecution, or adjudication of an alleged violation of law (including regulations not prohibited under subsection (a)), including matters related to whether a member of the Armed Forces constitutes a threat to the member or others. (d) Review- Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall-- (1) conduct a comprehensive review of the privately owned weapons policy of the Department of Defense, including legal and policy issues regarding the regulation of privately owned firearms off of a military installation, as recommended by the Department of Defense Independent Review Related to Fort Hood; and (2) submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report regarding the findings of and recommendations relating to the review conducted under paragraph (1), including any recommendations for adjustments to the requirements under this section. (e) Military Installation Defined- In this section, the term ‘military installation’ has the meaning given that term under (a) In General- The Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of Defense shall, acting through the Nuclear Weapons Council, develop the following: (1) Criteria for determining the appropriate baseline for safety and security of nuclear weapons through the life cycle of such weapons. (2) A methodology for determining the level of safety and security that may be achieved through a life extension program for each type of nuclear weapon. (b) Report Required- Not later than March 1, 2012, the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of Defense shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the criteria and the methodology developed pursuant to subsection (a). Subtitle H--Other Matters Subsection (f) of ‘(f) National Defense Panel- ‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT- Not later than February 1 of a year in which a quadrennial defense review is conducted under this section, there shall be established an independent panel to be known as the National Defense Panel (in this subsection referred to as the ‘Panel’). The Panel shall have the duties set forth in this subsection. ‘(2) MEMBERSHIP- The Panel shall be composed of ten members from private civilian life who are recognized experts in matters relating to the national security of the United States. Eight of the members shall be appointed as follows: ‘(A) Two by the chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. ‘(B) Two by the chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate. ‘(C) Two by the ranking member of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. ‘(D) Two by the ranking member of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate. ‘(3) CO-CHAIRS OF THE PANEL- In addition to the members appointed under paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall appoint two members from private civilian life to serve as co-chairs of the panel. ‘(4) PERIOD OF APPOINTMENT; VACANCIES- Members shall be appointed for the life of the Panel. Any vacancy in the Panel shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment. ‘(5) DUTIES- The Panel shall have the following duties with respect to a quadrennial defense review: ‘(A) While the review is being conducted, the Panel shall review the updates from the Secretary of Defense required under paragraph (8) on the conduct of the review. ‘(B) The Panel shall-- ‘(i) review the Secretary of Defense’s terms of reference and any other materials providing the basis for, or substantial inputs to, the work of the Department of Defense on the quadrennial defense review; ‘(ii) conduct an assessment of the assumptions, strategy, findings, and risks of the report on the quadrennial defense review required in subsection (d), with particular attention paid to the risks described in that report; ‘(iii) conduct an independent assessment of a variety of possible force structures of the armed forces, including the force structure identified in the report on the quadrennial defense review required in subsection (d); ‘(iv) review the resource requirements identified pursuant to subsection (b)(3) and, to the extent practicable, make a general comparison to the resource requirements to support the forces contemplated under the force structures assessed under this subparagraph; and ‘(v) provide to Congress and the Secretary of Defense, through the report under paragraph (7), any recommendations it considers appropriate for their consideration. ‘(6) FIRST MEETING- If the Secretary of Defense has not made the Secretary’s appointments to the Panel under paragraph (3) by February 1 of a year in which a quadrennial defense review is conducted under this section, the Panel shall convene for its first meeting with the remaining members. ‘(7) REPORT- Not later than 3 months after the date on which the report on a quadrennial defense review is submitted under subsection (d) to the congressional committees named in that subsection, the Panel established under paragraph (1) shall submit to those committees an assessment of the quadrennial defense review, including a description of the items addressed under paragraph (5) with respect to that quadrennial defense review. ‘(8) UPDATES FROM SECRETARY OF DEFENSE- The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that periodically, but not less often than every 60 days, or at the request of the co-chairs, the Department of Defense briefs the Panel on the progress of the conduct of a quadrennial defense review under subsection (a). ‘(9) ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS- ‘(A) The Panel may request directly from the Department of Defense and any of its components such information as the Panel considers necessary to carry out its duties under this subsection. The head of the department or agency concerned shall cooperate with the Panel to ensure that information requested by the Panel under this paragraph is promptly provided to the maximum extent practical. ‘(B) Upon the request of the co-chairs, the Secretary of Defense shall make available to the Panel the services of any federally funded research and development center that is covered by a sponsoring agreement of the Department of Defense. ‘(C) The Panel shall have the authorities provided in section 3161 of title 5 and shall be subject to the conditions set forth in such section. ‘(D) Funds for activities of the Panel shall be provided from amounts available to the Department of Defense. ‘(10) TERMINATION- The Panel for a quadrennial defense review shall terminate 45 days after the date on which the Panel submits its final report on the quadrennial defense review under paragraph (7).’. (a) State and Local Agencies to Which Sales May Be Made- (1) in subsection (a)-- (A) by striking ‘State and local law enforcement and firefighting agencies’ and inserting ‘State and local law enforcement, firefighting, homeland security, and emergency management agencies’; and (B) by striking ‘in carrying out law enforcement and firefighting activities’ and inserting ‘in carrying out law enforcement, firefighting, homeland security, and emergency management activities’; and (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘State or local law enforcement or firefighting agency’ both places it appears and inserting ‘State or local law enforcement, firefighting, homeland security, or emergency management agency’. (b) Types of Equipment That May Be Sold- Subsection (a) of such section is further amended by striking ‘and protective body armor’ and inserting ‘personal protective equipment, and other appropriate equipment’. (c) Clerical Amendments- (1) SECTION HEADING- The heading of such section is amended to read as follows: (2) TABLE OF SECTIONS- The item relating to section 2576 in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 153 of such title is amended to read as follows: ‘2576. Surplus military equipment: sale to State and local law enforcement, firefighting, homeland security, and emergency management agencies.’. (a) Program Established- The Secretary of Defense shall establish a competitive, merit-based program to accelerate the fielding of technologies developed pursuant to phase II Small Business Innovation Research Program projects, technologies developed by the defense laboratories, and other innovative technologies (including dual use technologies). The purpose of this program is to stimulate innovative technologies and reduce acquisition or lifecycle costs, address technical risks, improve the timeliness and thoroughness of test and evaluation outcomes, and rapidly insert such products directly in support of primarily major defense acquisition programs, but also other defense acquisition programs that meet critical national security needs. (b) Guidelines- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue guidelines for the operation of the program. At a minimum such guidance shall provide for the following: (1) The issuance of an annual broad agency announcement or the use of any other competitive or merit-based processes by the Department of Defense and by each military department for candidate proposals in direct support of primarily major defense acquisition programs, but also other defense acquisition programs as described in subsection (a). (2) The review of candidate proposals by the Department of Defense and by each military department and the merit-based selection of the most promising cost-effective proposals for funding through contracts, cooperative agreements, and other transactions for the purposes of carrying out the program. (3) The total amount of funding provided to any project under the program shall not exceed $3,000,000, unless the Secretary, or the Secretary’s designee, approves a larger amount of funding for the project. Any such approval shall be made on a case-by-case basis and notice of any such approval shall be submitted to the congressional defense committees by not later than 30 days after such approval is made. (4) No project shall be funded under the program for more than two years, unless the Secretary, or the Secretary’s designee, approves funding for any additional year. Any such approval shall be made on a case-by-case basis and notice of any such approval shall be submitted to the congressional defense committees by not later than 30 days after such approval is made. (c) Treatment Pursuant to Certain Congressional Rules- Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to require or enable any official of the Department of Defense to provide funding under this section to any earmark as defined pursuant to House Rule XXI, clause 9, or any congressionally directed spending item as defined pursuant to Senate Rule XLIV, paragraph 5. (d) Funding- Subject to the availability of appropriations for such purpose, the amounts authorized to be appropriated for research, development, test, and evaluation for each of fiscal years 2011 through 2015 may be used for any such fiscal year for the program established under subsection (a). (e) Transfer Authority- The Secretary may transfer funds available for the program to the research, development, test, and evaluation accounts of a military department, defense agency, or the unified combatant command for special operations forces pursuant to a proposal, or any part of a proposal, that the Secretary determines would directly support the purposes of the program. The transfer authority provided in this subsection is in addition to any other transfer authority available to the Department of Defense. (f) Report- Not later than 60 days after the last day of a fiscal year during which the Secretary carries out a program under this section, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes a list and description of each project funded under this section, including, for each such project, the amount of funding provided for the project, the defense acquisition program that the project supports, including the extent to which the project meets needs identified in its acquisition plan, the anticipated timeline for transition for the project, and the degree to which a competitive, merit-based process was used to evaluate and select the performers of the projects selected under this program. (g) Termination- The authority to carry out a program under this section shall terminate on September 30, 2015. Any amounts made available for the program that remain available for obligation on the date the program terminates may be transferred under subsection (e) during the 180-day period beginning on the date of the termination of the program. (a) Domestic Authority- (1) in subsection (a)(1), by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘In addition, the Secretary may make nonlethal excess supplies of the Department available to support domestic emergency assistance activities.’; and (2) in subsection (b)-- (A) by inserting ‘(1)’ before ‘Excess’; and (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(2) Excess supplies made available under this section to support domestic emergency assistance activities shall be transferred to the Secretary of Homeland Security. The Secretary of Defense may provide assistance in the distribution of such supplies at the request of the Secretary of Homeland Security.’. (b) Clerical Amendments- (1) SECTION HEADING- The heading of such section is amended to read as follows: (2) TABLE OF SECTIONS- The item relating to such section in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 152 of such title is amended to read as follows: ‘2557. Excess nonlethal supplies: availability for humanitarian relief, domestic emergency assistance, and homeless veterans assistance.’. (a) Title 5, United States Code- Title 5, United States Code, is amended as follows: (1) Section 8344(l)(2)(B), as added by section 1122(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (2) Section 9902(a)(2), as added by section 1113(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (b) Title 10, United States Code- Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows: (1) The tables of chapters at the beginning of subtitle A and at the beginning of part II of such subtitle are amended by striking ‘1031’ in the item relating to chapter 53 and inserting ‘1030’. (2) Section 127a is amended-- (A) in subsection (a)(1)(A), by striking ‘Armed Forces’ and inserting ‘armed forces’; and (B) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ‘Armed Forces’ both places it appears and inserting ‘armed forces’. (3) Section 127d(d)(1) is amended by striking ‘Committee on International Relations’ and inserting ‘Committee on Foreign Affairs’. (4) Section 132 is amended-- (A) by redesignating subsection (d), as added by section 2831(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (B) in such subsection, by striking ‘Guam Executive Council’ and inserting ‘Guam Oversight Council’. (5) Section 139c(d)(4) is amended by adding at period at the end. (6) Section 139d(a)(6) is amended by striking ‘propriety’ and inserting ‘proprietary’. (7) Section 172 is amended-- (A) by striking ‘(a)’ before ‘The Secretaries’; and (B) by striking subsection (b). (8) Section 181(b)(3) is amended by striking ‘Performance Evaluation’ and inserting ‘Program Evaluation’. (9) Section 186 is amended by redesignating the second subsection (c) (relating to definitions) as subsection (d). (10)(A) Section 382 is amended by striking ‘section 175 or 2332c’ in subsections (a), (b)(2)(C), and (d)(2)(A)(ii) and inserting ‘section 175, 229, or 2332a’. (B) The heading of such section is amended by striking ‘chemical or biological’. (C) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 18 is amended by striking the item relating to section 382 and inserting the following new item: ‘382. Emergency situations involving weapons of mass destruction.’. (11) Section 428(f) is amended by striking ‘, United States Code,’. (12) Section 525 is amended-- (A) in subsection (d), by striking ‘section 601(b)(4)’ and inserting ‘section 601(b)(5)’; and (B) in subsection (g)(1)-- (i) by striking ‘and is not’ and inserting ‘and are not’; and (ii) by adding at period at the end. (13) Section 841(c) is amended by striking ‘trail counsel’ and inserting ‘trial counsel’. (14) Section 843(b)(2)(B)(v) is amended by striking ‘Kidnaping; indecent assault;’ and inserting ‘Kidnaping, indecent assault,’. (15) Section 1030(e)(1) is amended by striking ‘3 years,’ and inserting ‘three years.’. (16) Section 1146 is amended-- (A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘(a) Benefits for Members Involuntarily Separated- ’, as added by section 5(1) of (B) by redesignating the second subsection (b) as subsection (c); and (C) in subsection (c), as so redesignated-- (i) by striking ‘Benefits for’ in the subsection heading; (ii) by striking ‘Armed Forces’ in the matter preceding paragraph (1) and inserting ‘armed forces’; and (iii) by striking ‘the members entitlement’ in paragraph (2) and inserting ‘the member’s entitlement’. (17) Section 1174(i) is amended by striking ‘Armed Forces’ each place it appears and inserting ‘armed forces’. (18) Section 1175a(j)(3) is amended by striking ‘title 10’ and inserting ‘this title’. (19) Section 1203(b)(4)(B) is amended by striking ‘determination,,’ and inserting ‘determination,’. (20) Section 1482a(c)(3) is amended by striking ‘section 1482(a)(11)’ and inserting ‘section 1482(e)(5)(A)’. (21) Section 1566a(a)(1) is amended by inserting a close parenthesis before the period at the end. (22) Section 1599c(a)(2)(B) is amended by striking ‘subchapter 1’ and inserting ‘subchapter I’. (23) Section 1781b(d) is amended by striking ‘March 1, 2008, and each year thereafter’ and inserting ‘March 1 each year’. (24) Section 1781c(h)(1) is amended by striking ‘180 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, and annually thereafter’ and inserting ‘April 30 each year’. (25) Section 1788(b) is amended by striking ‘Armed Forces’ and inserting ‘armed forces’. (26) Section 2004b(b)(1) is amended by striking ‘pay grade 0-3’ and inserting ‘pay grade O-3’. (27) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 104 is amended by transferring the item relating to section 2113a to appear after the item relating to section 2113. (28) Section 2130a(b)(1) is amended by striking ‘Training Program’ both places it appears and inserting ‘Training Corps program’. (29) Section 2222(a) is amended by striking ‘Effective October 1, 2005, funds’ and inserting ‘Funds’. (30) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 134, as amended by section 1031(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (31) Section 2323(a)(1)(D) is amended by inserting a close parenthesis before the semicolon. (32) Section 2362(e)(1) is amended by striking ‘IV’ and inserting ‘V’. (33) Section 2366a(c) is amended-- (A) by inserting a space between ‘(c)’ and the subsection heading; and (B) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘section 125a(a) of this title’ and inserting ‘section 118b(c)(3) of this title’. (34) Section 2433(a)(1) is amended by striking ‘section 2430a(c)’ and inserting ‘section 2430a(d)’. (35) Section 2433a(b)(2)(B) is amended by striking ‘section 181(g)((1)’ and inserting ‘section 181(g)(1)’. (36) Section 2476(d)(2)(D) is amended by striking ‘Navy Depots’ and inserting ‘Navy depots’. (37) Section 2488(f) is amended by striking ‘Armed Forces’ both places it appears and inserting ‘armed forces’. (38) Section 2533a(d) is amended in paragraphs (1) and (4) by striking ‘(b)(1)(A), (b)(2), or (b)(3)’ and inserting ‘(b)(1)(A) or (b)(2)’. (39) Section 2603 is amended by striking ‘Armed Forces’ both places it appears and inserting ‘armed forces’. (40) Section 2642(a)(3) is amended by striking ‘During the five-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010’ and inserting ‘During the period beginning on October 28, 2009, and ending on October 28, 2014’. (41) Section 2667(e) is amended-- (A) in paragraph (1)(A)(ii), by striking ‘sections 2668 and 2669’ and inserting ‘section 2668’; and (B) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘subsection (f)’ and inserting ‘subsection (g)’. (42) Section 2671(a)(2) is amended by striking ‘Armed Forces’ and inserting ‘armed forces’. (43) Section 2684a(g)(1) is amended by striking ‘March 1, 2007, and annually thereafter’ and inserting ‘March 1 each year’. (44) Section 2687a(a) is amended by striking ‘31for’ and inserting ‘31 for’. (45) Section 2694c(d)(4) is amended by inserting ‘Authorization’ after ‘Military Construction’. (46) Chapter 160 is amended-- (A) in section 2700(2), by inserting ‘pollutant or contaminant’,’ after ‘person’,’; and (B) in section 2701(b)(1), by striking ‘hazardous substances, pollutants, and contaminants’ and inserting ‘a hazardous substance or pollutant or contaminant’. (47) The table of subchapters at the beginning of chapter 173 is amended by inserting ‘Sec.’ above ‘2911’. (48) Section 2922d is amended by striking ‘1 or more’ each place it appears and inserting ‘one or more’. (49) Section 7042(a)(1)(A) is amended by striking the comma after ‘captain’. (50) Section 9515 is amended-- (A) in subsection (b), by striking ‘Section 1356 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 2008’ and inserting ‘section 1356 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008’; (B) in subsection (f)(2), by striking ‘paragraph (2)’ and inserting ‘paragraph (1)’; and (C) in subsection (j)(1), by striking ‘United States Code,’. (51) Section 10214 is amended by striking ‘14508(e)’ and inserting ‘14508(h)’. (52) Section 10216 is amended by striking ‘section 115(c)’ in subsections (b)(1), (c)(1), and (c)(2)(A) and inserting ‘section 115(d)’. (53) Section 10217(c)(1) is amended-- (A) by striking ‘Effective October 1, 2007, the’ and inserting ‘The’; and (B) by striking ‘after the preceding sentence takes effect’. (54) Section 12203(a) is amended by striking ‘above’ in the first sentence and inserting ‘of’. (55) Section 16132a is amended-- (A) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘agreement to service’ and inserting ‘agreement to serve’; and (B) in subsection (i)(2), by striking ‘whose’. (56) Section 16163a(b)(2) is amended by striking ‘section (j)’ and inserting ‘subsection (j)’. (c) Title 37- Title 37, United States Code, is amended as follows: (1) Section 303a(e)(3)(B) is amended by inserting ‘of’ after ‘result’. (2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 5 is amended by striking the item related to section 312 and inserting the following new item: ‘312. Special pay: nuclear-qualified officers extending period of active service.’. (3) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 is amended-- (A) by striking the item related to section 438 and inserting the following new item: ‘411k. Travel and transportation allowances: non-medical attendants for members who are determined to be very seriously or seriously wounded, ill, or injured.’; and (B) by striking the item related to section 438 and inserting the following new item: ‘438. Preventive health services allowance.’. (4) Section 411k(d)(1) is amended by striking ‘allowances section’ and inserting ‘allowances under section’. (d) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010- Effective as of October 28, 2009, and as if included therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (1) Section 325(d)(4) (123 Stat. 2254) is amended by striking ‘section 236’ and inserting ‘section 235’. (2) Section 502(c)(3) (123 Stat. 2274) is amended by striking ‘officers’ and inserting ‘general officers and flag officers’. (3) Section 581(a)(1)(C) (123 Stat. 2326) is amended by striking ‘subsection (f)’ and inserting ‘subsection (g), as redesignated by section 582(b)(1)’. (4) Section 584(a) (123 Stat. 2330) is amended by striking ‘such Act’ and inserting ‘the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act’. (5) Section 585(b)(1) (123 Stat. 2331) is amended by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B), and inserting the following new subparagraphs: ‘(A) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘section 102(4)’ and inserting ‘section 102(a)(4)’; and ‘(B) by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the following new paragraph: ‘(4) prescribe a suggested design for absentee ballot mailing envelopes;’; and’. (6) Section 589 (123 Stat. 2334; (A) in subsection (a)(1)-- (i) by striking ‘section 107(a)’ and inserting ‘section 107(1)’; and (ii) by striking ‘1973ff et seq.’ and inserting ‘1973ff-6(1)’; and (B) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ‘1977ff note’ and inserting ‘1973ff note’. (7) The undesignated section immediately following section 603 (123 Stat. 2350) is designated as section 604. (8) Section 714(c) (123 Stat. 2382; (A) by striking ‘feasability’ both places it appears and inserting ‘feasibility’; and (B) by striking ‘specialities’ both places it appears and inserting ‘specialties’. (9) Section 813(a)(3) (123 Stat. 2407) is amended by inserting ‘order’ after ‘task’ in the matter to be struck. (10) Section 921(b)(2) (123 Stat. 2432) is amended by inserting ‘subchapter I of’ before ‘chapter 21’. (11) Section 1014(c) (123 Stat. 2442) is amended by striking ‘in which the support’ and inserting ‘in which support’. (12) Section 1043(d) (123 Stat. 2457; (13) Section 1055(f) (123 Stat. 2462) is amended by striking ‘Combating’ and inserting ‘Combatting’. (14) Section 1063(d)(2) (123 Stat. 2470) is amended by striking ‘For purposes of this section, the’ and inserting ‘The’. (15) Section 1080(b) (123 Stat. 2479; (A) by striking ‘title 14’ and inserting ‘title XIV’; (B) by striking ‘title 10’ and inserting ‘title X’; and (C) by striking ‘the Military Commissions Act of 2006 ( (16) Section 1111(b) (123 Stat. 2495; (17) Section 1113(g)(1) (123 Stat. 2502; (18) Section 1202(c) (123 Stat. 2512) is amended-- (A) by striking ‘1208(f) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 ( (B) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (8), as proposed to be inserted, as subparagraphs (A) through (H), respectively and indenting the left margin of such subparagraphs, as so redesignated, 4 ems from the left margin. (19) Section 1261 (123 Stat. 2553; (20) Section 1306(b) (123 Stat. 2560) is amended by striking ‘fiscal year’ and inserting ‘Fiscal Year’. (21) Subsection (b) of section 1803 (123 Stat. 2612) is amended to read as follows: ‘(b) Appellate Review Under Detainee Treatment Act of 2005- ‘(1) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS TO ADDRESS HURRICANES IN THE GULF OF MEXICO, AND PANDEMIC INFLUENZA ACT, 2006- Section 1005(e) of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (title X of ‘(2) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006- Section 1405(e) of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 ( (22) Section 1916(b)(1)(B) (123 Stat. 2624) is amended by striking the comma after ‘5941’. (23) Section 2804(d)(2) (123 Stat. 2662) is amended by inserting ‘subchapter III of’ before ‘chapter 169’. (24) Section 2835(f)(1) (123 Stat. 2677) is amended by striking ‘publically-available’ and inserting ‘publicly available’. (25) Section 3503(b)(1) (123 Stat. 2719) is amended by striking the extra quotation marks. (26) Section 3508(1) (123 Stat. 2721) is amended by striking ‘headline’ and inserting ‘heading’. (e) Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009- The Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( (1) Section 143(b)(1) (122 Stat. 4381; (2) Section 231(b) (122 Stat. 4391; (3) Section 233(a)(3) (122 Stat. 4393) is amended by striking ‘122 Stat. 42’ and inserting ‘122 Stat. 43’. (4) Section 324(b) (122 Stat. 4416; (5) Section 332(e) (122 Stat. 4420; (6) Section 358(b) (122 Stat. 4427; (7) Section 596(b)(1)(D) ( (8) Section 597(f) (122 Stat. 4481) is amended by striking ‘meeting’ and inserting ‘meanings’. (9) Section 604(b) (122 Stat. 4483) is amended by inserting ‘of’ after ‘(a)(1)’. (10) Section 619(d) (122 Stat. 4489; (11) Section 711(d)(2) (122 Stat. 4501) is amended by striking ‘1111((b)’ and inserting ‘1111(b)(3)’. (12) Effective as of October 14, 2008, and as if included in (13) Section 822(c)(1)(A) (122 Stat. 4532) is amended by striking ‘this title’ and inserting ‘title 10, United States Code’. (14) Section 863(b)(3)(A) (122 Stat. 4547) is amended by striking ‘subsection (d)(2)(A)’ and inserting ‘subsection (d)(3)(A)’. (15) Section 869 (122 Stat. 4553) is amended-- (A) in subsection (b), by striking ‘433(a)’ and inserting ‘433a(a)’; and (B) in subsection (c)(4)-- (i) by striking ‘37(j)’ and inserting ‘37(g)’; and (ii) by striking ‘433(j)’ and inserting ‘433(g)’. (16) Section 873(a)(4) (122 Stat. 4558; (17) Section 1111 ( (A) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘section 821’ and inserting ‘section 833’; and (B) in subsection (b)-- (i) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ‘secretary of a military department’ and inserting ‘Secretary of a military department’; (ii) in paragraph (1)-- (I) by striking ‘the the requirements’ and inserting ‘the requirements’; and (II) by striking ‘this title’ and inserting ‘such title’; and (iii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘any any of the following’ and inserting ‘any of the following’. (18) Section 1602(5) (122 Stat. 4653; (19) Section 3113 (122 Stat. 4754; (A) in subsection (b)(2), by inserting a close parenthesis before the semicolon; and (B) in subsection (d)(2), by striking ‘fails repay’ and inserting ‘fails to repay’. (20) Section 3512 (122 Stat. 4770; (f) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008- The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (1) Section 624 (122 Stat. 153; (A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘Operating’ and inserting ‘Operation’; and (B) in subsection (b), by striking ‘Operating’ and inserting ‘Operation’. (2) Effective as of January 28, 2008, and as if included in (A) in subsection (a)(3), by striking ‘speciality’ and inserting ‘specialty’; and (B) in subsection (e), by striking ‘subsection (c)’ and inserting ‘subsection (d)(1)’. (3) Section 808 (122 Stat. 215; (4) Section 827(a)(2) (122 Stat. 228; (5) Section 843 (122 Stat. 236) is amended-- (A) in subsection (a)(2)(C), by striking ‘paragraph (1)’ and inserting ‘subparagraph (A)’; and (B) in subsection (b)(2)(C), by striking ‘paragraph (1)’ and inserting ‘subparagraph (A)’. (6) Section 890 (122 Stat. 269; (A) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘Act’ before ‘of 1979’; (B) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘Act’ before ‘of 1979’; and (C) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ‘sections’ and inserting ‘parts’. (7) Section 1063(a)(16) (122 Stat. 322) is amended by striking ‘(1)’. (8) Effective as of January 28, 2008, and as if included in (9) Section 1243(c) (122 Stat. 396) is amended by striking ‘4))’ and inserting ‘4)))’. (10) Section 1244(a)(3) (122 Stat. 396) is amended by striking ‘4))’ and inserting ‘4)))’. (g) John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007- Effective as of October 17, 2006, and as if included therein as enacted, the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 ( (1) Section 321(a)(1) (120 Stat. 2144; (2) Section 348(2) (120 Stat. 2159) is amended in the matter to be struck from and inserted in section 366(d) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 ( (3) Section 355(b)(1) (120 Stat. 2162) is amended in the matter to be struck from section 344 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 ( (4) Section 511(b)(3) (120 Stat. 2183) is amended in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by striking ‘section’ and inserting ‘title’. (5) Section 705(b)(2) (120 Stat. 2281; (6) Section 2821(b)(1) (120 Stat. 2474) is amended by inserting ‘by striking’ after ‘subsection (a)(1),’. (h) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006- Effective as of January 6, 2006, and as if included therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 ( (1) Section 515(h) (119 Stat. 3237; (2) Section 535(b) (119 Stat. 3249; (3) Section 1056(e)(2) (119 Stat. 3440) is amended by striking ‘Section’ and inserting ‘Effective as of December 2, 2002, and as if included in (4) Section 1057 (119 Stat. 3440) is amended-- (A) in subsection (a)-- (i) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘4778,’; and (ii) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘4747’ and inserting ‘2651’; (B) in subsection (b)(3)-- (i) by striking ‘109,’; and (ii) by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘Section 109 is amended by striking ‘State or Territory, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, or the District of Columbia’ each place it appears and inserting ‘State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, or the Virgin Islands’; and (C) in subsection (b)(5)-- (i) in the language to be struck from (ii) in the language to be inserted in (5) Section 1104 (119 Stat. 3448) is amended-- (A) in subsection (a)(3)(A), by inserting ‘the first place it appears’ before ‘and inserting’; and (B) in subsection (c), by striking ‘subsection (c)(1)’ and inserting ‘subsection (b)(2)’. (6) Section 2806(c)(2)(A) (119 Stat. 3507) is amended in the matter to be struck from and inserted in (i) Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005- The Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 ( (1) Section 577(b)(12) ( (2) Section 1085 (118 Stat. 2065; (j) Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003- Section 1032(a) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 ( (k) Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009- Effective as of May 22, 2009, and as if included therein as enacted, section 205 of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 ( (1) in subsection (a)(1)(B), by striking ‘paragraphs (1) and (2)’ in the matter to be inserted and inserting ‘paragraphs (1), (2), and (3)’; and (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘2433a(c)(3)’ and inserting ‘2433a(c)(1)(C)’. (l) Technical Correction Regarding SBIR Extension- Section 9(m)(2) of the Small Business Act ( (m) Technical Correction Regarding Small Shipyards and Maritime Communities Assistance Program- Section 3506 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, as reinstated by the amendment made by section 1073(c)(14) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (n) Technical Correction Regarding DOT Maritime Heritage Property- Section 6(a)(1)(C) of the National Maritime Heritage Act of 1994 ( (o) Technical Correction of Citation- Section 42 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act ( (1) in subsection (c)(1) by striking ‘( (2) in subsection (c)(2)(A) by inserting ‘of 1978’ after ‘Contract Disputes Act’. (a) Study- (1) IN GENERAL- Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall commission a study by an independent, non-profit organization on the optimal balance between manned and remotely piloted aircraft of the Armed Forces. (2) SELECTION- The independent, non-profit organization selected for the study under paragraph (1) shall be qualified on the basis of having performed work in the fields of national security and combat systems. (b) Matters Included- The study under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) With respect to each military department, an assessment of the feasibility and desirability of a more rapid transition from manned to remotely piloted aircraft for a range of operations, including combat operations. (2) An evaluation of the current ability of each military department to resist attacks mounted by foreign militaries with significant investments in research and development and deployment of remotely piloted aircraft, including an assessment of each military department’s ability to defend against-- (A) a large enemy force of remotely piloted aircraft; and (B) any other relevant scenario involving remotely piloted aircraft that the Secretary determines appropriate. (3) An analysis of-- (A) current and future capabilities of foreign militaries in developing and deploying remotely piloted aircraft; and (B) identified vulnerabilities of United States weapons systems to foreign remotely piloted aircraft. (4) Conclusions on the matters described in paragraphs (1) through (3) and what the independent, non-profit organization conducting the study determines is the optimal balance of investment in development and deployment of manned versus remotely piloted aircraft. (c) Report- Not later than December 1, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report that includes the study under subsection (a). (d) Form- (1) STUDY- The study under subsection (a) shall include a classified annex with respect to the matters described in subsection (b)(3). (2) REPORT- The report under subsection (c) may include a classified annex. (e) Remotely Piloted Aircraft Defined- In this section, the term ‘remotely piloted aircraft’ means any unmanned aircraft operated remotely, whether within or beyond line-of-sight, including unmanned aerial systems, unmanned aerial vehicles, remotely piloted vehicles, and remotely piloted aircraft. Any law applicable to Operation Iraqi Freedom shall apply in the same manner and to the same extent to the successor contingency operation known as Operation New Dawn, except as specifically provided in this Act, any amendment made by this Act, or any other law enacted after the date of the enactment of this Act. (a) Sense of Congress- It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should support the research, development, test, and evaluation, procurement, and fielding of effective non-lethal weapons and technologies explicitly designed to, with respect to counterinsurgency operations, reduce military casualties and fatalities, improve military mission accomplishment and operational effectiveness, reduce civilian casualties and fatalities, and minimize undesired damage to property and the environment. (b) Program Required- (1) DEMONSTRATION AND ASSESSMENT- The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Executive Agent for Non-lethal Weapons and in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments and the combatant commanders, shall carry out a program to demonstrate and assess the utility and effectiveness of non-lethal weapons to provide escalation of force options in counter-insurgency operations. (2) NON-LETHAL WEAPONS EVALUATED- In evaluating non-lethal weapons under the program under this subsection, the Secretary shall include non-lethal weapons designed for counter-personnel and counter-materiel missions. (c) Report- (1) REPORT REQUIRED- Not later than October 1, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the role and utility of non-lethal weapons and technologies in counterinsurgency operations. (2) ELEMENTS- The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A description of the results of any demonstrations and assessments of non-lethal weapons conducted during fiscal year 2011. (B) A description of the Secretary’s plans for any demonstrations and assessments of non-lethal weapons to be conducted during fiscal years 2012 and 2013. (C) A description of the extent to which non-lethal weapons doctrine, training, and employment include the use of strategic communications strategies to enable the effective employment of non-lethal weapons. (D) A description of the input of the military departments in developing concepts of operations and tactics, techniques, and procedures for incorporating non-lethal weapons into the current escalation of force procedures of each department. (E) A description of the extent to which non-lethal weapons and technologies are integrated into the standard equipment and training of military units. It is the sense of Congress that no action should be taken to implement the reduction of the strategic nuclear forces of the United States below the levels described in the Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms signed on April 8, 2010 (commonly known as the ‘New START Treaty’), unless the President submits to the congressional defense committees a report on such reduction, including-- (1) the justification for such reduction; (2) an assessment of the strategic environment, threat, and policy and the technical and operational implications of such reduction; and (3) written certification by the President that-- (A) either-- (i) the strategic environment or the assessment of the threat allows for such reduction; or (ii) technical measures to provide a commensurate or better level of safety, security, and reliability as before such reduction have been implemented for the remaining strategic nuclear forces of the United States; (B) the remaining strategic nuclear forces of the United States provide a sufficient means of protection against unforeseen technical challenges and geopolitical events; (C) such reduction is compensated by other measures (such as nuclear modernization, conventional forces, and missile defense) that together provide a commensurate or better deterrence capability and level of credibility as before such reduction; and (D) measures to modernize the nuclear weapons complex are being implemented (or have been implemented) to provide a sufficiently responsive infrastructure to support the remaining strategic nuclear forces of the United States. TITLE XI--CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS Sec. 1101. Clarification of authorities at personnel demonstration laboratories. Sec. 1102. Requirements for Department of Defense senior mentors. Sec. 1103. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees working overseas. Sec. 1104. Extension and modification of enhanced Department of Defense appointment and compensation authority for personnel for care and treatment of wounded and injured members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 1105. Rate of overtime pay for Department of the Navy employees performing work aboard or dockside in support of the nuclear aircraft carrier forward deployed in Japan. (a) Clarification of Applicability of Direct Hire Authority- Section 1108 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( (1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘identified’ and all that follows and inserting ‘designated by section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘2 percent’ and inserting ‘5 percent’. (b) Clarification of Applicability of Full Implementation Requirement- Section 1107 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘that are exempted by’ and all that follows and inserting ‘designated by section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘as enumerated in’ and all that follows and inserting ‘designated by section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (c) Correction to Section Reference- Section 1121 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (123 Stat. 2505) is amended-- (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘ (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘section 9902(h) of such title 5’ and inserting ‘such section’. (d) Effective Date- (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the amendments made by this section shall take effect as of October 28, 2009. (2) The amendment made by subsection (a)(2) shall take effect as of the date of enactment of this Act. (a) In General- The Secretary of Defense shall issue appropriate policies and procedures to ensure that all senior mentors employed by the Department of Defense are-- (1) hired as highly qualified experts under (2) required to comply with all applicable Federal laws and regulations on personnel and ethics matters. (b) Senior Mentor Defined- In this section, the term ‘senior mentor’ means a retired flag, general, or other military officer or retired senior civilian official who provides expert experience-based mentoring, teaching, training, advice, and recommendations to senior military officers, staffs, and students as they participate in war games, warfighting courses, operational planning, operational exercises, and decision-making exercises. Effective January 1, 2011, section 1101(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( (a) Designation of Occupations Covered by Recruitment and Appointment Authority- Subsection (a)(2) of (1) in subparagraph (A)-- (A) in clause (i), by striking ‘shortage category positions’ and inserting ‘a shortage category occupation or critical need occupation’; and (B) in clause (ii), by striking ‘highly qualified persons directly’ and inserting ‘qualified persons directly in the competitive service’; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: ‘(C) Any designation by the Secretary for purposes of subparagraph (A)(i) shall be based on an analysis of current and future Department of Defense workforce requirements.’. (b) Extension- Subsection (c) of such section is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1)-- (A) by inserting ‘under subsection (a)(1)’ after ‘Secretary of Defense’; and (B) by striking ‘September 30, 2012’ and inserting ‘December 31, 2015’; and (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘September 30, 2012’ and inserting ‘December 31, 2015’. (a) Overtime Pay at Time-and-a-half Rate- ‘(6)(A) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2), for an employee of the Department of the Navy who is assigned to temporary duty to perform work aboard, or dockside in direct support of, the nuclear aircraft carrier that is forward deployed in Japan and who would be nonexempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act but for the application of the foreign area exemption in section 13(f) of that Act ( ‘(B) Subparagraph (A) shall expire on September 30, 2014.’. (b) Reports- (1) SECRETARY OF NAVY REPORT- Not later than September 30, 2013, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the Secretary of Defense and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management a report that-- (A) describes the use of the authority under paragraph (6) of (B) provides a recommendation on whether an extension of the provisions of that paragraph is needed. (A) addresses the use of paragraph (6) of (B) describes the extent to which other employees experience the same circumstances as were experienced by those described in that paragraph before its enactment; (C) provides an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages that would be anticipated from extending the expiration date of the authority under that paragraph, and from expanding the authority under that paragraph to include other employees; and (D) conveys the report of the Secretary of the Navy referred to in paragraph (1). TITLE XII--MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS Sec. 1201. Expansion of authority for support of special operations to combat terrorism. Sec. 1202. Addition of allied government agencies to enhanced logistics interoperability authority. Sec. 1203. Expansion of temporary authority to use acquisition and cross-servicing agreements to lend certain military equipment to certain foreign forces for personnel protection and survivability. Sec. 1204. Authority to pay personnel expenses in connection with African cooperation. Sec. 1205. Authority to build the capacity of Yemen Ministry of Interior Counter Terrorism Forces. Sec. 1206. Air Force scholarships for Partnership for Peace nations to participate in the Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training program. Sec. 1207. Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to build the capacity of foreign military forces. Sec. 1211. Limitation on availability of funds for certain purposes relating to Iraq. Sec. 1212. One-year extension and modification of Commanders’ Emergency Response Program. Sec. 1214. Extension of authority to transfer defense articles and provide defense services to the military and security forces of Iraq and Afghanistan. Sec. 1215. No permanent military bases in Afghanistan. Sec. 1216. Authority to use funds for reintegration activities in Afghanistan. Sec. 1217. Authority to establish a program to develop and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan. Sec. 1218. Extension of logistical support for coalition forces supporting operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Sec. 1219. Recommendations on oversight of contractors engaged in activities relating to Afghanistan. Sec. 1220. Extension and modification of Pakistan Counterinsurgency Fund. Sec. 1231. One-year extension of report on progress toward security and stability in Afghanistan. Sec. 1232. Two-year extension of United States plan for sustaining the Afghanistan National Security Forces. Sec. 1233. Modification of report on responsible redeployment of United States Armed Forces from Iraq. Sec. 1234. Report on Department of Defense support for coalition operations. Sec. 1235. Reports on police training programs. Sec. 1236. Report on certain Iraqis affiliated with the United States. Sec. 1237. Report on Department of Defense’s plans to reform the export control system. Sec. 1238. Report on United States efforts to defend against threats posed by the anti-access and area-denial capabilities of certain nation-states. Sec. 1239. Defense Science Board report on Department of Defense strategy to counter violent extremism outside the United States. Sec. 1240. Report on merits of an Incidents at Sea agreement between the United States, Iran, and certain other countries. Sec. 1241. Requirement to monitor and evaluate Department of Defense activities to counter violent extremism in Africa. Sec. 1242. NATO Special Operations Headquarters. Sec. 1243. National Military Strategy to Counter Iran and required briefings. Subtitle A--Assistance and Training Section 1208(a) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 ( (a) Enhanced Interoperability Authority- Subsection (a) of (1) by inserting ‘(1)’ before ‘Subject to’; (2) by inserting ‘of the United States’ after ‘armed forces’; (3) by striking the second sentence; and (4) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: ‘(2) In addition to any logistic support, supplies, and services provided under paragraph (1), the Secretary may provide logistic support, supplies, and services to allied forces solely for the purpose of enhancing the interoperability of the logistical support systems of military forces participating in combined operations with the United States in order to facilitate such operations. Such logistic support, supplies, and services may also be provided under this paragraph to a nonmilitary logistics, security, or similar agency of an allied government if such provision would directly benefit the armed forces of the United States. ‘(3) Provision of support, supplies, and services pursuant to paragraph (1) or (2) may be made only with the concurrence of the Secretary of State.’. (b) Conforming Amendments- Such section is further amended-- (1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘subsection (a)’ in paragraphs (1) and (2) and inserting ‘subsection (a)(1)’; and (2) in subsection (c)-- (A) in paragraph (1)-- (i) by striking ‘Except as provided in paragraph (2), the’ and inserting ‘The’; and (ii) by striking ‘this section’ and inserting ‘subsection (a)(1)’; and (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘In addition’ and all that follows through ‘fiscal year,’ and inserting ‘The value of the logistic support, supplies, and services provided under subsection (a)(2) in any fiscal year may not’. (a) Expansion for Training for Deployment- Paragraph (3) of section 1202(a) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 ( (1) by striking ‘only in Iraq or Afghanistan, or in a peacekeeping operation described in paragraph (1), as applicable, and’; and (2) by striking ‘those forces.’ and inserting ‘those forces and only-- ‘(A) in Iraq or Afghanistan; ‘(B) in a peacekeeping operation described in paragraph (1); or ‘(C) in connection with the training of those forces to be deployed to Iraq, Afghanistan, or a peacekeeping operation described in paragraph (1) for such deployment.’. (b) Notice and Wait on Exercise of Additional Authority- Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(5) NOTICE AND WAIT ON PROVISION OF EQUIPMENT FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES- Equipment may not be provided under paragraph (1) in connection with training as specified in paragraph (3)(C) until 15 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the specified congressional committees written notice on the provision of such equipment for such purpose.’. (a) In General- Chapter 53 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1050 the following new section: ‘The Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department may pay the travel, subsistence, and special compensation of officers and students of African countries and other expenses that the Secretary considers necessary for African cooperation.’. (b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 53 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1050 the following new item: ‘1050a. African cooperation: payment of personnel expenses.’. (a) Authority- The Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, provide assistance during fiscal year 2011 to enhance the ability of the Yemen Ministry of Interior Counter Terrorism Forces to conduct counterterrorism operations against al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and its affiliates. (b) Types of Assistance- (1) AUTHORIZED ELEMENTS- Assistance under subsection (a) may include the provision of equipment, supplies, and training. (2) REQUIRED ELEMENTS- Assistance under subsection (a) shall be provided in a manner that promotes-- (A) observance of and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; and (B) respect for legitimate civilian authority in Yemen. (3) ASSISTANCE OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY LAW- The Secretary of Defense may not use the authority in subsection (a) to provide any type of assistance described in this subsection that is otherwise prohibited by any provision of law. (c) Funding- Of the amount authorized to be appropriated by section 301 for operation and maintenance for fiscal year 2011, $75,000,000 may be utilized to provide assistance under subsection (a). (d) Notice to Congress- (1) IN GENERAL- Not less than 15 days before providing assistance under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the committees of Congress specified in paragraph (2) a notice setting forth the assistance to be provided, including the types of such assistance, the budget for such assistance, and the completion date for the provision of such assistance. (2) COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS- The committees of Congress specified in this paragraph are-- (A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. (a) Establishment of Scholarship Program- The Secretary of the Air Force may establish and maintain a demonstration scholarship program to allow personnel of the air forces of countries that are signatories of the Partnership for Peace Framework Document to receive undergraduate pilot training and necessary related training through the Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training (ENJJPT) program. The Secretary of the Air Force shall establish the program pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense in consultation with the Secretary of State. (b) Transportation, Supplies, and Allowance- Under such conditions as the Secretary of the Air Force may prescribe, the Secretary may provide to a person receiving a scholarship under the scholarship program-- (1) transportation incident to the training received under the ENJJPT program; (2) supplies and equipment to be used during the training; (3) flight clothing and other special clothing required for the training; (4) billeting, food, and health services; and (5) a living allowance at a rate to be prescribed by the Secretary, taking into account the amount of living allowances authorized for a member of the Armed Forces of the United States under similar circumstances. (c) Relation to Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training Program- (1) ENJJPT STEERING COMMITTEE AUTHORITY- Nothing in this section shall be construed or interpreted to supersede the authority of the ENJJPT Steering Committee under the ENJJPT Memorandum of Understanding. Pursuant to the ENJJPT Memorandum of Understanding, the ENJJPT Steering Committee may resolve to forbid any airman or airmen from a Partnership for Peace nation to participate in the Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training program under the authority of a scholarship under this section. (2) NO REPRESENTATION- Countries whose air force personnel receive scholarships under the scholarship program shall not have privilege of ENJJPT Steering Committee representation. (d) Limitation on Eligible Countries- The Secretary of the Air Force may not use the authority in subsection (a) to provide assistance described in subsection (b) to any foreign country that is otherwise prohibited from receiving such type of assistance under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 ( (e) Cost-sharing- For purposes of ENJJPT cost-sharing, personnel of an air force of a foreign country who receive a scholarship under the scholarship program may be counted as United States pilots. (f) Progress Report- Not later than February 1, 2012, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on the status of the demonstration program, including the opinion of the Secretary and NATO allies on the benefits of the program and whether or not to permanently authorize the program or extend the program beyond fiscal year 2012. The report shall specify the following: (1) The countries participating in the scholarship program. (2) The total number of foreign pilots who received scholarships under the scholarship program. (3) The amount expended on scholarships under the scholarship program. (4) The source of funding for scholarships under the scholarship program. (g) Duration- No scholarship may be awarded under the scholarship program after September 30, 2012. (h) Funding Source- Amounts to award scholarships under the scholarship program shall be derived from amounts authorized to be appropriated for operation and maintenance for the Air Force. (a) Temporary Limitation on Amount for Building Capacity to Participate in or Support Military and Stability Operations- (1) IN GENERAL- Subsection (c)(5) of section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 ( (A) by striking ‘and not more than’ and inserting ‘not more than’; and (B) by inserting after ‘fiscal year 2011’ the following: ‘, and not more than $100,000,000 may be used during fiscal year 2012’. (2) EFFECTIVE DATE- The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to programs under subsection (a) of such section that begin on or after that date. (b) One-year Extension of Authority- Subsection (g) of such section, as most recently amended by section 1206(c) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( (1) by striking ‘September 30, 2011’ and inserting ‘September 30, 2012’; and (2) by striking ‘fiscal years 2006 through 2011’ and inserting ‘fiscal years 2006 through 2012’. Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan No funds appropriated pursuant to an authorization of appropriations in this Act may be obligated or expended for a purpose as follows: (1) To establish any military installation or base for the purpose of providing for the permanent stationing of United States Armed Forces in Iraq. (2) To exercise United States control of the oil resources of Iraq. (a) One-year Extension of CERP Authority- Subsection (a) of section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 ( (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘Fiscal Year 2010’ and inserting ‘Fiscal Year 2011’; (2) by striking ‘fiscal year 2010’ and inserting ‘fiscal year 2011’; and (3) by striking ‘operation and maintenance’ and all that follows and inserting ‘operation and maintenance-- ‘(1) not to exceed $100,000,000 may be used by the Secretary of Defense in such fiscal year to provide funds for the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Iraq; and ‘(2) not to exceed $400,000,000 may be used by the Secretary of Defense in such fiscal year to provide funds for the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan.’. (b) Quarterly Reports- Subsection (a) of such section, as so amended, is further amended-- (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph: ‘(3) FORM OF REPORTS- Each report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted, at a minimum, in a searchable electronic format that enables the congressional defense committees to sort the report by amount expended, location of each project, type of project, or any other field of data that is included in the report.’. (c) Restriction on Amount of Payments; Notification- Such section, as so amended, is further amended-- (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (i); and (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following new subsections: ‘(g) Restriction on Amount of Payments- Funds made available under this section for the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program may not be obligated or expended to carry out any project if the total amount of funds made available for the purpose of carrying out the project, including any ancillary or related elements of the project, exceeds $20,000,000. ‘(h) Notification- Not less than 15 days before obligating or expending funds made available under this section for the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program for a project in Afghanistan with a total anticipated cost of $5,000,000 or more, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a written notice containing the following information: ‘(1) The location, nature, and purpose of the proposed project, including how the project is intended to advance the military campaign plan for Afghanistan. ‘(2) The budget and implementation timeline for the proposed project, including any other funding under the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program that has been or is anticipated to be contributed to the completion of the project. ‘(3) A plan for the sustainment of the proposed project, including any agreement with either the Government of Afghanistan, a department or agency of the United States Government other than the Department of Defense, or a third party contributor to finance the sustainment of the activities and maintenance of any equipment or facilities to be provided through the proposed project’. (d) Definition- Subsection (i) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (c)(1) of this section, is amended by striking ‘means the program’ and all that follows and inserting ‘means the program that-- ‘(1) authorizes United States military commanders to carry out small-scale projects designed to meet urgent humanitarian relief requirements or urgent reconstruction requirements within their areas of responsibility; and ‘(2) provides an immediate and direct benefit to the people of Iraq or Afghanistan.’. (a) Extension of Authority- Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (b) Limitation on Amount- Subsection (d)(1) of such section, as so amended, is further amended in the second sentence by inserting ‘or 2011’ after ‘fiscal year 2010’. (c) Exception From Notice to Congress Requirements- Subsection (e) of such section, as so amended, is further amended-- (1) by striking ‘(e) Notice to Congress- The Secretary of Defense’ and inserting the following: ‘(e) Notice to Congress- ‘(1) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense’; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘(2) EXCEPTION- The requirement to provide notice under paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to a reimbursement for access based on an international agreement.’. (d) Extension of Notice Requirement Relating to Reimbursement of Pakistan for Support Provided by Pakistan- Section 1232(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1223 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, is further amended by striking ‘September 30, 2011’ and inserting ‘September 30, 2012’. (a) Extension of Authority- Subsection (h) of section 1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (b) Quarterly Reports- Subsection (f)(1) of such section is amended by striking ‘during fiscal year 2010’ and inserting ‘through March 31, 2012’. None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended by the United States Government to establish any military installation or base for the purpose of providing for the permanent stationing of United States Armed Forces in Afghanistan. (a) Authority- The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may utilize not more than $50,000,000 from funds made available to the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance for fiscal year 2011 to support the reintegration into Afghan society of those individuals who pledge-- (1) to cease all support for the insurgency in Afghanistan; (2) to live in accordance with the Constitution of Afghanistan; (3) to cease violence against the Government of Afghanistan and its international partners; and (4) that they do not have material ties to al Qaeda or affiliated transnational terrorist organizations. (b) Submission of Guidance- (1) INITIAL SUBMISSION- Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a copy of the guidance issued by the Secretary or the Secretary’s designee concerning the allocation of funds utilizing the authority of subsection (a). Such guidance shall include-- (A) mechanisms for coordination with the Government of Afghanistan and other United States Government departments and agencies as appropriate; and (B) mechanisms to track rates of recidivism among individuals described in subsection (a). (2) MODIFICATIONS- If the guidance in effect for the purpose stated in paragraph (1) is modified, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a copy of the modification not later than 15 days after the date on which such modification is made. (c) Reports- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on activities carried out utilizing the authority of subsection (a). (d) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined- In this section, the term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means-- (1) the congressional defense committees; and (2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representative and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. (e) Expiration- The authority to utilize funds under subsection (a) shall expire at the close of December 31, 2011. (a) Authority- The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State are authorized to establish a program to develop and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan in accordance with the requirements of this section. (b) Formulation and Execution of Program- (1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense shall jointly develop any project under the program authorized under subsection (a). Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, shall implement any project under the program authorized under subsection (a). (2) EXCEPTION- The Secretary of Defense shall implement a project under the program authorized under subsection (a) if the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State jointly determine that the Secretary of Defense should implement the project. (c) Types of Projects- Infrastructure projects under the program authorized under subsection (a) may include-- (1) water, power, and transportation projects; and (2) other projects in support of the counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan. (d) Authority in Addition to Other Authorities- The authority to establish the program and develop and carry out infrastructure projects under subsection (a) is in addition to any other authority to provide assistance to foreign countries. (e) Applicability of Certain Administrative Provisions- (1) IN GENERAL- The administrative provisions of chapter 2 of part III of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 ( (2) GIFTS, ETC- The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State may accept and use in furtherance of the purposes of this section, money, funds, property, and services of any kind made available by gift, devise, bequest, grant, or otherwise for such purposes. (f) Funding- (1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary of Defense may use up to $400,000,000 of funds made available to the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance for fiscal year 2011 to carry out the program authorized under subsection (a). (2) AVAILABILITY- Funds made available by paragraph (1) are authorized to remain available until September 30, 2012. (g) Congressional Notification- The Secretary of Defense shall notify the appropriate congressional committees not less than 30 days before obligating or expending funds to carry out a project or transferring funds to the Secretary of State for the purpose of implementing a project under the program authorized under subsection (a). Such notification shall be in writing and contain a description of the details of the proposed project, including-- (1) a plan for the sustainment of the project; and (2) a description of how the project supports the counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan. (h) Return of Unexpended Funds- (1) IN GENERAL- Any unexpended funds transferred to the Secretary of State for the purpose of implementing a project under the program authorized under subsection (a) shall be returned to the Secretary of Defense if the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, determines that the project cannot be implemented for any reason or that the project no longer supports the counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan. (2) AVAILABILITY- Any funds returned to the Secretary of Defense under this subsection shall be available for use under this section and shall be treated in the same manner as funds not transferred to the Secretary of State. (i) Reports- (1) REPORT REQUIRED- Not later than 30 days after the end of each fiscal year in which funds are obligated, expended, or transferred under the program authorized under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report regarding implementation of the program during such fiscal year. (2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED- The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) The allocation and use of funds under the program during the fiscal year. (B) A description of each project for which funds were expended or transferred during the fiscal year. (j) Definition- In this section, the term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means-- (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate. Section 1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (a) Recommendations Required- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction shall, in consultation with the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Inspector General of the United States Agency for International Development, and the Inspector General of the Department of State-- (1) issue recommendations on measures to increase oversight of contractors engaged in activities relating to Afghanistan; (2) report on the status of efforts of the Department of Defense, the United States Agency for International Development, and the Department of State to implement existing recommendations regarding oversight of such contractors; and (3) report on the extent to which military and security contractors or subcontractors engaged in activities relating to Afghanistan have been responsible for the deaths of Afghan civilians. (b) Elements of Recommendations- The recommendations issued under subsection (a)(1) shall include recommendations for reducing the reliance of the United States on-- (1) military and security contractors or subcontractors engaged in activities relating to Afghanistan that have been responsible for the deaths of Afghan civilians; and (2) Afghan militias or other armed groups that are not part of the Afghan National Security Forces. (a) Extension- Subsection (h) of section 1224 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (b) Required Elements of Assistance- Subsection (b) of such section is amended-- (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): ‘(2) REQUIRED ELEMENTS OF ASSISTANCE- Assistance provided to the security forces of Pakistan under this section in a fiscal year after fiscal year 2010 shall be provided in a manner that promotes-- ‘(A) observance of and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; and ‘(B) respect for legitimate civilian authority within Pakistan.’. Subtitle C--Reports and Other Matters Section 1230(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( Section 1231(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (a) Report Required- Subsection (a) of section 1227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( (1) by striking ‘December 31, 2009’ and inserting ‘December 31, 2010’; and (2) by striking ‘90 days thereafter’ and inserting ‘180 days thereafter’. (b) Elements- Subsection (b) of such section is amended-- (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘Multi-National Force-Iraq’ each place it occurs and inserting ‘United States Forces-Iraq’; and (2) by adding at the end the following: ‘(6) An assessment of progress to transfer responsibility of programs, projects, and activities carried out in Iraq by the Department of Defense to other United States Government departments and agencies, international or nongovernmental entities, or the Government of Iraq. The assessment should include a description of the numbers and categories of programs, projects, and activities for which such other entities have taken responsibility or which have been discontinued by the Department of Defense. The assessment should also include a discussion of any difficulties or barriers in transitioning such programs, projects, and activities and what, if any, solutions have been developed to address such difficulties or barriers. ‘(7) An assessment of progress toward the goal of building the minimum essential capabilities of the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of the Interior of Iraq, including a description of-- ‘(A) such capabilities both extant and remaining to be developed; ‘(B) major equipment necessary to achieve such capabilities; ‘(C) the level and type of support provided by the United States to address shortfalls in such capabilities; and ‘(D) the level of commitment, both financial and political, made by the Government of Iraq to develop such capabilities, including a discussion of resources used by the Government of Iraq to develop capabilities that the Secretary determines are not minimum essential capabilities for purposes of this paragraph. ‘(8) A listing and assessment of the anticipated level and type of support to be provided by United States special operations forces to the Government of Iraq and Iraqi special operations forces during the redeployment of United States conventional forces from Iraq. The assessment should include a listing of anticipated critical support from general purpose forces required by United States special operations forces and Iraqi special operations forces. The assessment should also include combat support, including rotary aircraft and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets, combat service support, and contractor support needed through December 31, 2011.’. (c) Secretary of State Comments- Such section is further amended by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following: ‘(c) Secretary of State Comments- Prior to submitting the report required under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall provide a copy of the report to the Secretary of State for review. At the request of the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense shall include an appendix to the report which contains any comments or additional information that the Secretary of State requests.’. (d) Form- Subsection (d) of such section is amended by striking ‘, whether or not included in another report on Iraq submitted to Congress by the Secretary of Defense,’. (e) Termination- Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following: ‘(f) Termination- The requirement to submit the report required under subsection (a) shall terminate on September 30, 2012.’. (f) Repeal of Other Reporting Requirements- The following provisions of law are hereby repealed: (1) Section 1227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 ( (2) Section 1225 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (a) Report Required- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the implementation of the coalition support authorities of the Department of Defense during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. (b) Elements- The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A description of the purpose and use of each coalition support authority of the Department of Defense. (2) For the period of Operation Enduring Freedom ending on September 30, 2010, a summary of the amount of training, equipment, services, or other assistance provided or loaned under any coalition support authority of the Department of Defense set forth, for each such authority, by amount provided or loaned during each fiscal year of such period for each recipient country. (3) For the period of Operation Iraqi Freedom ending on September 30, 2010, a summary of the amount of training, equipment, services, or other assistance provided or loaned under any coalition support authority of the Department of Defense set forth, for each such authority, by amount provided or loaned during each fiscal year of such period for each recipient country. (4) An assessment of the effectiveness of each coalition support authority of the Department of Defense in meeting its intended purpose. (5) For each recipient country of coalition support under a coalition support authority of the Department of Defense-- (A) a description of the contribution of such country to coalition operations in Operation Enduring Freedom or Operating Iraqi Freedom; and (B) an assessment of the extent to which coalition support provided by the United States enhanced the ability of such country to participate in coalition operations in Operation Enduring Freedom or Operating Iraqi Freedom. (6) A description of the actions taken by the Department Defense to eliminate duplication and overlap in coalition support provided under the coalition support authorities of the Department of Defense. (7) An assessment by the Secretary of Defense whether there is an ongoing need for each coalition support authority of the Department of Defense, and an estimate of the anticipated future demand for coalition support under such coalition support authorities. (c) Coalition Support Authorities of the Department of Defense Defined- In this section, the term ‘coalition support authorities of the Department of Defense’ means the following: (1) Coalition Support Funds, including the authority to provide specialized training and loan specialized equipment under the Coalition Support Fund (commonly referred to as the ‘Coalition Readiness Support Program’). (2) Lift and sustain authority under appropriations Acts or under section 1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( (3) Global lift and sustain authority under (4) The authority to provide logistic support, supplies, and services to allied forces participating in combined operations under (5) The temporary authority to lend significant military equipment under acquisition and cross-servicing agreements pursuant to section 1202 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 ( (6) The authority under section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 ( (7) Any other authority that the Secretary of Defense designates as a coalition support authority of the Department of Defense for purposes of the report required by subsection (a). (a) DoD Inspector General Report on Afghan National Police Training Program- (1) REPORT REQUIRED- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall, in consultation with the Inspector General of the Department of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the Afghan National Police training program. (2) REVIEW- In preparing the report required by paragraph (1), the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall conduct a review of the Afghan National Police training program that focuses on developments since the Inspector General of the Department of Defense and the Inspector General of the Department of State released the report entitled ‘Department of Defense Obligations and Expenditures of Funds Provided to the Department of State for the Training and Mentoring of the Afghan National Police’ (DODIG Report No. D-2010-042, DOSIG Report No. MERO-A-10-06, February 9, 2010). (3) ELEMENTS OF REPORT- The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A description of the components, planning, and scope of the Afghan National Police training program since the United States assumed control of the program in 2003. (B) A description of the cost to the United States of the Afghan National Police training program, including the source and amount of funding, and a description of the allocation of responsibility between the Department of Defense and the Department of State for funding the program. (C) A description of the allocation of responsibility between the Department of Defense and the Department of State for the oversight and execution of the program. (D) A description of the personnel and staffing requirements for overseeing and executing the program, both in the United States and in theater, including United States civilian government and military personnel, contractor personnel, and nongovernmental personnel, and non-United States civilian and military personnel, contractor personnel, and nongovernmental personnel. (E) An assessment of the cost, performance metrics, and planning associated with the transfer of administration of the contract for the Afghan National Police training program from the Department of State to the Department of Defense. (b) GAO Report on Use of Government Personnel Rather Than Contractors for Training Afghan National Police- (1) REPORT- Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the use of United States Government personnel rather than contractors for the training of the Afghan National Police. (2) ELEMENTS- The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A description of the roles and responsibilities of contractors and United States Government personnel in the Afghan National Police training program and a description of how the division of roles and responsibilities between such contractors and personnel has been determined. (B) An assessment of the relative advantages and disadvantages of using contractors or United States Government personnel in the Afghan National Police training program, including an assessment of-- (i) the shortfalls and inefficiencies, if any, in contractor performance in the program; and (ii) options for leveraging United States Government resources and capacity to address the shortfalls and inefficiencies described in clause (i) and to better address current and future needs under the program. (C) An assessment of the factors, such as oversight, cost considerations, performance, policy, and other factors, that would be impacted by transferring responsibilities for the performance of the Afghan National Police training program from contractors to United States Government personnel. (D) A review of the lessons learned from the execution and oversight of the police training program in Iraq, and any other relevant police training programs led by the Department of Defense, regarding the relative advantages and disadvantages of using United States Government personnel or contractors to carry out police training programs for foreign nations. (c) Report on Government Police Training and Equipping Programs- (1) REPORT- Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on United States Government police training and equipping programs outside the United States. (2) ELEMENTS- The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A list of all United States Government departments and agencies involved in implementing police training and equipping programs. (B) A description of the scope, size, and components of all police training and equipping programs for fiscal years 2010 and 2011, to include for each such program-- (i) the name of each country that received assistance under the program; (ii) the types of recipient nation units receiving such assistance, including national police, gendarmerie, counternarcotics police, counterterrorism police, Formed Police Units, border security, and customs; (iii) the purpose and objectives of the program; (iv) the funding and personnel levels for the program in each such fiscal year; (v) the authority under which the program is conducted; (vi) the name of the United States Government department or agency with lead responsibility for the program and the mechanisms for oversight of the program; (vii) the extent to which the program is implemented by contractors or United States Government personnel; and (viii) the metrics for measuring the results of the program. (C) An assessment of the requirements for police training and equipping programs, and what changes, if any, are required to improve the capacity of the United States Government to meet such requirements. (D) An evaluation of the appropriate role of United States Government departments and agencies in coordinating on and carrying out police training and equipping programs. (E) An evaluation of the appropriate role of contractors in carrying out police training and equipping programs, and what modifications, if any, are needed to improve oversight of such contractors. (F) Recommendations for legislative modifications, if any, to existing authorities relating to police training and equipping programs. (d) Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined- In this section, the term ‘appropriate committees of Congress’ means-- (1) the Committees on Armed Services, Foreign Relations, Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and Appropriations of the Senate; and (2) the Committees on Armed Services, Foreign Affairs, Oversight and Government Reform, and Appropriations of the House of Representatives. (a) In General- Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, and the heads of other appropriate Federal agencies (as determined by the Secretary of Defense), shall submit to the Congress a report containing the information described in subsection (b). In preparing such report, the Secretary of Defense shall use available information from organizations and entities closely associated with the United States mission in Iraq that have received United States Government funding through an official and documented contract, award, grant, or cooperative agreement. (b) Information- The information described in this subsection is the following: (1) The number of Iraqis who were or are employed by the United States Government in Iraq or who are or were employed in Iraq by an organization or entity closely associated with the United States mission in Iraq that has received United States Government funding through an official and documented contract, award, grant, or cooperative agreement. (2) The number of Iraqis who have applied-- (A) for resettlement in the United States as a refugee under section 1243 of the Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act of 2007 (subtitle C of title XII of division A of (B) to enter the United States as a special immigrant under section 1244 of such Act; or (C) to enter the United States as a special immigrant under section 1059 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 ( (3) The status of each application described in paragraph (2). (4) The estimated number of individuals described in paragraph (1) who have been injured or killed in Iraq. (c) Expedited Processing- The Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall develop a plan using the report submitted under subsection (a) to expedite the processing of the applications described in subsection (b)(2) in the case of Iraqis at risk as the United States withdraws from Iraq. (a) Report Required- Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the Department of Defense’s plans to implement the reforms to the United States export control system recommended by the interagency task force established at the direction of the President on August 13, 2009. (b) Matters to Be Included- The report required under subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the extent to which the plans to reform the export control system will-- (1) impact the Defense Technology Security Administration of the Department of Defense; (2) affect the role of the Department of Defense with respect to export control policy; and (3) ensure greater protection and monitoring of militarily critical technologies. (c) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined- In this section, the term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means-- (1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. (a) Finding- Congress finds that the 2010 report on the Department of Defense Quadrennial Defense Review concludes that ‘[a]nti-access strategies seek to deny outside countries the ability to project power into a region, thereby allowing aggression or other destabilizing actions to be conducted by the anti-access power. Without dominant capabilities to project power, the integrity of United States alliances and security partnerships could be called into question, reducing United States security and influence and increasing the possibility of conflict’. (b) Sense of Congress- It is the sense of Congress that, in light of the finding in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense should ensure that the United States has the appropriate authorities, capabilities, and force structure to defend against any potential future threats posed by the anti-access and area-denial capabilities of potentially hostile foreign countries. (c) Report- Not later than April 1, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on United States efforts to defend against any potential future threats posed by the anti-access and area-denial capabilities of potentially hostile nation-states. (d) Elements- The report required under subsection (c) shall include the following: (1) An assessment of any potential future threats posed by the anti-access and area-denial capabilities of potentially hostile foreign countries, including an identification of the foreign countries with such capabilities, the nature of such capabilities, and the possible advances in such capabilities over the next 10 years. (2) A description of any efforts by the Department of Defense to address the potential future threats posed by the anti-access and area-denial capabilities of potentially hostile foreign countries. (3) A description of the authorities, capabilities, and force structure that the United States may require over the next 10 years to address the threats posed by the anti-access and area-denial capabilities of potentially hostile foreign countries. (e) Form- The report required under subsection (c) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex if necessary. (f) Definitions- In this section-- (1) the term ‘anti-access’, with respect to capabilities, means any action that has the effect of slowing the deployment of friendly forces into a theater, preventing such forces from operating from certain locations within that theater, or causing such forces to operate from distances farther from the locus of conflict than such forces would normally prefer; and (2) the term ‘area-denial’, with respect to capabilities, means operations aimed to prevent freedom of action of friendly forces in the more narrow confines of the area under a potentially hostile nation-state’s direct control, including actions by an adversary in the air, on land, and on and under the sea to contest and prevent joint operations within a defended battlespace. (a) Report Required- Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Defense Science Board shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the strategy of the Department of Defense to counter violent extremism outside the United States. (b) Elements- The report required by subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following: (1) A review of the current strategy, research activities, resource allocations, and organizational structure of the Department of Defense for countering violent extremism outside the United States. (2) A review of interagency coordination and decision-making processes for executing and overseeing strategies and programs for countering violent extremism outside the United States. (3) An analysis of alternatives and options available to the Department of Defense to counter violent extremism outside the United States. (4) An analysis of legal, policy, and strategy issues involving efforts to counter violent extremism outside the United States as such efforts potentially affect domestic efforts to interrupt radicalization efforts within the United States. (5) An analysis of the current information campaign of the Department of Defense against violent extremists outside the United States. (6) Such recommendations for further action to address the matters covered by the report as the Defense Science Board considers appropriate. (7) Such other matters as the Defense Science Board determines relevant. (a) Report Required- Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report assessing the relative merits of a multilateral or bilateral Incidents at Sea military-to-military agreement between the United States, the Government of Iran, and other countries operating in the Persian Gulf aimed at preventing accidental naval conflict in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz.
SEC. 212. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS BY DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY FOR OPERATION OF NATIONAL CYBER RANGE.
SEC. 322. REPEAL OF CONDITIONS ON EXPANSION OF FUNCTIONS PERFORMED UNDER PRIME VENDOR CONTRACTS FOR DEPOT-LEVEL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR.
SEC. 332. MODIFICATION AND REPEAL OF CERTAIN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.‘Sec. 2697. Acceptance and use of landing fees charged for use of domestic military airfields by civil aircraft
SEC. 342. EXTENSION OF ARSENAL SUPPORT PROGRAM INITIATIVE.‘Sec. 2648. Persons and supplies: sea, land, and air transportation’.
‘Sec. 2649. Civilian passengers and commercial cargoes: transportation on Department of Defense vessels, vehicles, and aircraft’.
SEC. 353. TECHNICAL CORRECTION TO OBSOLETE REFERENCE RELATING TO USE OF FLEXIBLE HIRING AUTHORITY TO FACILITATE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FUNCTIONS BY CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES.‘Sec. 2740. Property loss: reimbursement of members and civilian employees for full replacement value of household effects when contractor reimbursement not available
SEC. 355. RECOVERY OF IMPROPERLY DISPOSED OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROPERTY.‘Sec. 2790. Recovery of improperly disposed of Department of Defense property
SEC. 356. OPERATIONAL READINESS MODELS.
SEC. 502. AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF WARRANT OFFICERS IN THE GRADE OF W-1 BY COMMISSION AND STANDARDIZATION OF WARRANT OFFICER APPOINTING AUTHORITY.
SEC. 504. ADMINISTRATIVE REMOVAL OF OFFICERS FROM PROMOTION LIST.
SEC. 505. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY FOR OFFICERS SELECTED FOR APPOINTMENT TO GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICER GRADES TO WEAR INSIGNIA OF HIGHER GRADE BEFORE APPOINTMENT.‘Sec. 777a. Wearing of insignia of higher grade before appointment to a grade above major general or rear admiral (frocking): authority; restrictions
SEC. 506. TEMPORARY AUTHORITY TO REDUCE MINIMUM LENGTH OF ACTIVE SERVICE AS A COMMISSIONED OFFICER REQUIRED FOR VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT AS AN OFFICER.
SEC. 513. TEMPORARY AUTHORITY FOR TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT OF NON-DUAL STATUS MILITARY TECHNICIANS.
SEC. 514. REVISION OF STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF THE RESERVE FORCES POLICY BOARD.‘Sec. 10301. Reserve Forces Policy Board
SEC. 515. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR NEW OATH WHEN OFFICER TRANSFERS FROM ACTIVE-DUTY LIST TO RESERVE ACTIVE-STATUS LIST.
SEC. 517. DIRECT APPOINTMENT OF GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MERCHANT MARINE ACADEMY INTO THE NATIONAL GUARD.
SEC. 522. MODIFICATION OF PROMOTION BOARD PROCEDURES FOR JOINT QUALIFIED OFFICERS AND OFFICERS WITH JOINT STAFF EXPERIENCE.‘Sec. 705a. Rest and recuperation absence: certain members undergoing extended deployment to a combat zone
SEC. 533. CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS.‘Sec. 1214a. Members determined fit for duty in Physical Evaluation Board evaluation: prohibition on involuntary administrative separation due to unsuitability based on medical conditions considered in evaluation
SEC. 535. REVIEW OF LAWS, POLICIES, AND REGULATIONS RESTRICTING SERVICE OF FEMALE MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.
SEC. 542. ENHANCED AUTHORITY TO PUNISH CONTEMPT IN MILITARY JUSTICE PROCEEDINGS.‘Sec. 848. Art. 48. Contempts
SEC. 543. IMPROVEMENTS TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROGRAMS.
SEC. 553. PARTICIPATION OF ARMED FORCES HEALTH PROFESSIONS SCHOLARSHIP AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM RECIPIENTS IN ACTIVE DUTY HEALTH PROFESSION LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM.
SEC. 554. ACTIVE DUTY OBLIGATION FOR MILITARY ACADEMY GRADUATES WHO PARTICIPATE IN THE ARMED FORCES HEALTH PROFESSIONS SCHOLARSHIP AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.
SEC. 562. CONTINUATION OF AUTHORITY TO ASSIST LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES THAT BENEFIT DEPENDENTS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES.‘Sec. 1133. Bronze Star: limitation on persons eligible to receive
SEC. 572. AUTHORIZATION AND REQUEST FOR AWARD OF DISTINGUISHED-SERVICE CROSS TO SHINYEI MATAYOSHI FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING WORLD WAR II.
SEC. 582. ENHANCEMENT OF COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR MILITARY FAMILIES WITH SPECIAL NEEDS.
SEC. 583. MODIFICATION OF YELLOW RIBBON REINTEGRATION PROGRAM.
SEC. 584. EXPANSION AND CONTINUATION OF JOINT FAMILY SUPPORT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.‘Sec. 2601a. Direct acceptance of gifts by members of the armed forces and Department of Defense and Coast Guard employees and their families
SEC. 592. INCREASE IN NUMBER OF PRIVATE SECTOR CIVILIANS AUTHORIZED FOR ADMISSION TO NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY.‘Sec. 411l. Travel and transportation allowances: attendance of members and other persons at Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program events
‘Sec. 1412. Administrative provisions’.
SEC. 634. CONFORMITY OF SPECIAL COMPENSATION FOR MEMBERS WITH INJURIES OR ILLNESSES REQUIRING ASSISTANCE IN EVERYDAY LIVING WITH MONTHLY PERSONAL CAREGIVER STIPEND UNDER DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PROGRAM OF COMPREHENSIVE ASSISTANCE FOR FAMILY CAREGIVERS.
SEC. 635. SENSE OF CONGRESS CONCERNING AGE AND SERVICE REQUIREMENTS FOR RETIRED PAY FOR NON-REGULAR SERVICE.
SEC. 642. FEASIBILITY STUDY ON ESTABLISHMENT OF FULL EXCHANGE STORE IN THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS.‘Sec. 1110b. TRICARE program: extension of dependent coverage
SEC. 703. SURVIVOR DENTAL BENEFITS.
SEC. 704. AURAL SCREENINGS FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.
SEC. 712. POSTDEPLOYMENT HEALTH REASSESSMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF THE MEDICAL TRACKING SYSTEM FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES DEPLOYED OVERSEAS.
SEC. 714. IMPROVEMENTS TO OVERSIGHT OF MEDICAL TRAINING FOR MEDICAL CORPS OFFICERS.
SEC. 804. REVIEW OF ACQUISITION PROCESS FOR RAPID FIELDING OF CAPABILITIES IN RESPONSE TO URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS.‘Sec. 2223a. Information technology acquisition planning and oversight requirements
SEC. 806. REQUIREMENTS FOR INFORMATION RELATING TO SUPPLY CHAIN RISK.
SEC. 812. MANAGEMENT OF MANUFACTURING RISK IN MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS.
SEC. 825. EXTENSION OF SUNSET DATE FOR CERTAIN PROTESTS OF TASK AND DELIVERY ORDER CONTRACTS.
SEC. 826. INCLUSION OF OPTION AMOUNTS IN LIMITATIONS ON AUTHORITY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN PROTOTYPE PROJECTS.
SEC. 828. ENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE CONTRACTS.‘CHAPTER 149--DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM
‘Sec. 2545. Definitions
‘Sec. 2546. Civilian management of the defense acquisition system
‘Sec. 2547. Acquisition-related functions of chiefs of the armed forces
‘Sec. 2548. Performance assessments of the defense acquisition system
PART II--DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCESEC. 871. ACQUISITION WORKFORCE EXCELLENCE.‘Sec. 1701a. Management for acquisition workforce excellence
SEC. 872. AMENDMENTS TO THE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT.‘Sec. 1762. Demonstration project relating to certain acquisition personnel management policies and procedures
SEC. 873. CAREER DEVELOPMENT FOR CIVILIAN AND MILITARY PERSONNEL IN THE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE.‘Sec. 1722b. Special requirements for civilian employees in the acquisition field
SEC. 874. RECERTIFICATION AND TRAINING REQUIREMENTS.‘Sec. 1748. Fulfillment standards for acquisition workforce training
SEC. 875. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION WORKFORCE.
SEC. 877. DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY CURRICULUM REVIEW.‘Sec. 1746. Defense Acquisition University’.
PART III--FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTSEC. 881. AUDIT READINESS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.‘Sec. 139e. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy
‘Sec. 2508. Industrial Base Fund
‘Sec. 132a. Deputy Chief Management Officer
‘Sec. 137a. Principal Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense’.
‘Sec. 138b. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering’.
‘Sec. 138c. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and Programs’.
‘Sec. 138d. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs’.
‘Sec. 139b. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation; Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering: joint guidance’.
‘Sec. 2438. Performance assessments and root cause analyses’.
SEC. 923. REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INTERSERVICE MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION OF REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFT SUPPORT OF INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND RECONNAISSANCE.‘Sec. 231. Long-range plan for construction of naval vessels
‘Sec. 122a. Public availability of Department of Defense reports required by law
SEC. 1062. PROHIBITION ON INFRINGING ON THE INDIVIDUAL RIGHT TO LAWFULLY ACQUIRE, POSSESS, OWN, CARRY, AND OTHERWISE USE PRIVATELY OWNED FIREARMS, AMMUNITION, AND OTHER WEAPONS.
SEC. 1072. SALE OF SURPLUS MILITARY EQUIPMENT TO STATE AND LOCAL HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCIES.‘Sec. 2576. Surplus military equipment: sale to State and local law enforcement, firefighting, homeland security, and emergency management agencies’.
SEC. 1073. DEFENSE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM.‘Sec. 2557. Excess nonlethal supplies: availability for humanitarian relief, domestic emergency assistance, and homeless veterans assistance’.
SEC. 1075. TECHNICAL AND CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.
SEC. 1204. AUTHORITY TO PAY PERSONNEL EXPENSES IN CONNECTION WITH AFRICAN COOPERATION.‘Sec. 1050a. African cooperation: payment of personnel expenses
SEC. 1205. AUTHORITY TO BUILD THE CAPACITY OF YEMEN MINISTRY OF INTERIOR COUNTER TERRORISM FORCES.
SEC. 1213. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN COALITION NATIONS FOR SUPPORT PROVIDED TO UNITED STATES MILITARY OPERATIONS.

U.S. Congress - Text of H.R.6523 as Engrossed Amendment Senate Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011

