The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowH.Con.Res.108 - Expressing the sense of Congress that the Shi'ite Personal Status Law in Afghanistan violates the fundamental human rights of women and should be repealed.

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HCON 108 IHCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
111th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
1st SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
H. CON. RES. 108CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Shi’ite Personal Status Law in Afghanistan violates the fundamental human rights of women and should be repealed.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
April 23, 2009CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
April 23, 2009CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Mrs. MALONEY (for herself, Ms. BALDWIN, and Mrs. BIGGERT) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign AffairsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
CONCURRENT RESOLUTIONCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Shi’ite Personal Status Law in Afghanistan violates the fundamental human rights of women and should be repealed.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas in March 2009, the Shi’ite Personal Status Law was approved by the parliament of Afghanistan and signed by President Hamid Karzai;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas according to the United Nations, the law legalizes marital rape by mandating that a wife cannot refuse sex to her husband unless she is ill;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas the law also weakens mothers’ rights in the event of a divorce and prohibits a woman from leaving her home unless her husband determines it is for a ‘legitimate purpose’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas President Barack Obama has called the law ‘abhorrent’ and stated that ‘there are certain basic principles that all nations should uphold, and respect for women and respect for their freedom and integrity is an important principle’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights has said that the law represents a ‘huge step in the wrong direction’ and is ‘extraordinary, reprehensible and reminiscent of the decrees made by the Taliban regime in Afghanistan in the 1990s’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas the Secretary-General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has asserted that passage of the law could discourage countries in Europe from contributing additional troops to help combat terrorism in the region;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas President Karzai has instructed the Government of Afghanistan and members of the clergy to review the law and change any articles that are not in keeping with Afghanistan’s Constitution and Islamic Sharia, yet has not made a concrete declaration that the provision legalizing marital rape and other provisions curtailing women’s rights will be removed completely;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas the law includes provisions that are fundamentally incompatible with the obligations of the Government of Afghanistan under the various international instruments that it has ratified, as well as under its own Constitution;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas Afghanistan is a signatory of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which establishes the principle of nondiscrimination, including on the basis of sex, and states that men and women are entitled to equal rights to marriage, during marriage, and at its dissolution;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas Afghanistan became a party to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, done at New York December 16, 1966, and entered into force January 3, 1976 (ICESCR), which emphasizes the principle of self-determination, in that men and women may freely determine their political status as well as their economic, social, and cultural development;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas Afghanistan acceded to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, done at New York December 18, 1979, and entered into force September 3, 1981 (CEDAW), which condemns discrimination against women in all its forms and reaffirms the equal rights and responsibilities of men and women during marriage and at its dissolution;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas, notwithstanding any declarations or reservations made upon ratification of these various international conventions, the Government of Afghanistan is under an obligation not to act in any way which might defeat the object and purpose of these conventions, pursuant to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, done at New York May 23, 1969, and entered into force January 27, 1980, which is widely recognized as embodying customary international law;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas Article 22 of the Constitution of Afghanistan (2003) prohibits any kind of discrimination between and privilege among the citizens of Afghanistan and establishes the equal rights of all citizens before the law;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas Article 54 of the Constitution of Afghanistan obligates the Government of Afghanistan to ensure the physical and psychological well-being of the family, especially of mothers and children;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas the international community and the United States have a long-standing commitment to and interest in working with the people and Government of Afghanistan to re-establish respect for fundamental human rights and protect women’s rights in Afghanistan; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas the provisions in the Shi’ite Personal Status Law that restrict women’s rights are diametrically opposed to those goals: Now, therefore, be itCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That Congress--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) urges the Government of Afghanistan and President Hamid Karzai to declare the provisions of the Shi’ite Personal Status Law on marital rape and restrictions on women’s freedom of movement unconstitutional;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) supports the decision by President Karzai to analyze the draft law and strongly urges him not to publish it on the grounds that it violates the Constitution of Afghanistan and the basic human rights of women;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) encourages the Secretary of State, the Special Representative to Afghanistan and Pakistan, the Ambassador-at-Large for International Women’s Issues, and the United States Ambassador to Afghanistan to consider and address the status of women’s rights and security in Afghanistan to ensure that these rights are not being eroded through unjust laws, policies, or institutions; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) encourages the Government of Afghanistan to solicit information and advice from the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry for Women’s Affairs, the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, and women-led nongovernmental organizations to ensure that current and future legislation and official policies protect and uphold the equal rights of women, including through national campaigns to lead public discourse on the importance of women’s status and rights to the overall stability of Afghanistan.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
OC Blog Articles Related To This Bill
Recent OC Blog Articles
- Yes, let's stride towards an open VCS for legislation (or, GitHub for laws on OC) May 23, 2012
- Contact Congress Today to #FreeTHOMAS May 17, 2012
- Yochai Benkler: Blueprint for Democratic Participation May 10, 2012
- New NDAA Would Give the Military Clandestine Cyberwar Powers May 08, 2012
- The Week Ahead in Congress May 07, 2012

U.S. Congress - Text of H.Con.Res.108 as Introduced in House Expressing the sense of Congress that the Shi'ite Personal Status Law in Afghanistan vi...



