The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowH.Res.763 - Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United Nations resolutions on the "defamation of religions" are incompatible with the fundamental freedoms of individuals to freely exercise and peacefully express their religious beliefs.

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HRES 763 IHCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
111th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
1st SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
H. RES. 763CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United Nations resolutions on the ‘defamation of religions’ are incompatible with the fundamental freedoms of individuals to freely exercise and peacefully express their religious beliefs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
September 22, 2009CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
September 22, 2009CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Mr. POE of Texas (for himself, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, and Mr. INGLIS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign AffairsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
RESOLUTIONCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United Nations resolutions on the ‘defamation of religions’ are incompatible with the fundamental freedoms of individuals to freely exercise and peacefully express their religious beliefs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas since 1999, the United Nations has annually passed a resolution on the ‘defamation of religions’ in the Human Rights Council (previously the Commission on Human Rights) and in the General Assembly;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas unlike traditional defamation laws, which punish false statements of fact that harm individual persons, measures prohibiting the ‘defamation of religions’ punish the peaceful criticism of ideas;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas United Nations resolutions on the ‘defamation of religions’ contradict United States Constitutional protections of free speech and the free exercise of religion;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas the concept of ‘defamation of religions’ is fundamentally inconsistent with the principles outlined in the United Nations’ founding documents, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which affirms the protection of persons, rather than ideas;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights recognizes that ‘Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights recognizes that ‘Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas the sponsor of these United Nations resolutions, the Organization of the Islamic Conference, has indicated that it is seeking to create a legally binding mechanism to combat the ‘defamation of religions’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas such resolutions provide international support for domestic anti-blasphemy laws in some countries;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas domestic anti-blasphemy laws are often used by governments to punish the peaceful expression of disfavored religious beliefs and ideas;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights has confirmed that there is no international consensus on the concept of ‘defamation of religions’, and multiple United Nations Special Rapporteurs have acknowledged that the difficulties in providing an objective definition of the term ‘defamation of religions’ at the international level make the whole concept open to abuse;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas the United States Constitution does not guarantee, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights does not recognize, the right to have one’s beliefs protected from challenge or criticism, or the right not to be offended;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas existing legal instruments already address discrimination, personal defamation, and incitement to violence in ways that are more carefully focused to address those specific problems without unduly threatening the rights of speech and religious free exercise; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Whereas legal efforts alone cannot foster an environment of respect and religious freedom, and education and public diplomacy are vital tools in the protection of a peaceful and robust exchange of ideas and beliefs: Now, therefore, be itCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Resolved, That the House of Representatives--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) underscores the value of respectful speech and civil dialogue, at the same time that it affirms that the freedoms of speech and religious free exercise are integral to the health of free societies and the dignity of the human person;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) strongly urges the Secretary of State to make every effort to defeat the passage of future resolutions on the ‘defamation of religions’ at the United Nations, and other resolutions or international instruments that would threaten the free and peaceful exchange of ideas, beliefs, and truth claims;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) calls on the United Nations to abandon all efforts to adopt or affirm the flawed concept of ‘defamation of religions’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) urges fellow Member States of the United Nations to focus on protecting the fundamental freedom of individuals to peacefully express their religious beliefs, and to avoid supporting resolutions that threaten the freedom of expression.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
OC Blog Articles Related To This Bill
Recent OC Blog Articles
- Yes, let's stride towards an open VCS for legislation (or, GitHub for laws on OC) May 23, 2012
- Contact Congress Today to #FreeTHOMAS May 17, 2012
- Yochai Benkler: Blueprint for Democratic Participation May 10, 2012
- New NDAA Would Give the Military Clandestine Cyberwar Powers May 08, 2012
- The Week Ahead in Congress May 07, 2012

U.S. Congress - Text of H.Res.763 as Introduced in House Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United Nations resolution...



