<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : News Articles for S.139 Data Breach Notification Act </title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s139/atom_news" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s139/news" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2009-11-08T19:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/news/53401</id>
  <entry>
    <title>BSA Commends Senate Judiciary Committee on Passage Data Breach Legislation</title>
    <link href="http://www.ag-ip-news.com/GetArticle.asp?Art_ID=7768" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-11-08:/commentary/6644562</id>
    <updated>2009-11-08T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ag-IP-news Agency</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...security and protect consumers online. The Committee voted on S.1490, the Personal Data Privacy and Security Act of 2009, and S.139, the Data Breach Notification Act. BSA commends Chairman Leahy, Senator Hatch and Senator Feinstein for their leadership &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ag-ip-news.com/GetArticle.asp?Art_ID=7768&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.govinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=1915" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-11-05:/commentary/6604899</id>
    <updated>2009-11-05T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Slashdot</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 But the Data Breach Notification Act, S.139, exempts federal agencies and other organizations subject to the bill from disclosing a breach if the data ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=1915&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>National Data Breach Law Advances</title>
    <link href="http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/~3/lqeYFyIL8uM/National-Data-Breach-Law-Advances" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-11-05:/commentary/6599649</id>
    <updated>2009-11-05T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Slashdot</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...seriously, I don't think self-regulation (aka industry standards) is going to cut it for data security. That's what this does: &quot;S.139 would grant an exemption for data that 'was rendered indecipherable through the use of best practices or methods, such &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/~3/lqeYFyIL8uM/National-Data-Breach-Law-Advances&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The &amp;#39;party of no&amp;#39; becomes the &amp;#39;party of slow&amp;#39;</title>
    <link href="http://www.grist.org/article/2009-11-05-the-party-of-no-becomes-the-party-of-slow/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-11-04:/commentary/6604902</id>
    <updated>2009-11-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Grist Magazine</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Climate Stewardship Act of 2003 (S. 139): EIA analysis conducted before full Senate consideration. No committee consideration. - Energy Policy Act of 2003 ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grist.org/article/2009-11-05-the-party-of-no-becomes-the-party-of-slow/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A shield deferred, once again</title>
    <link href="http://www.rbr.com/media-news/washington-beat/18313.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-11-04:/commentary/6604900</id>
    <updated>2009-11-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Radio Business Report</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The committee passed three other bills, S.1490, Personal Data Privacy and Security Act of 2009; S.139, Data Breach Notification Act; and S. 1472, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rbr.com/media-news/washington-beat/18313.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Committee Passes Data Breach Laws</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/eweek_retail/~3/_52FtLCaaj0/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-11-04:/commentary/6591332</id>
    <updated>2009-11-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>eWeek</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...committee voted yes on the Personal Data Privacy and Security Act of 2009 (S.1490) and the Data Breach Notification Act (S.139). The vote means the bills are now headed to the full Senate for its stamp of approval. The Personal Data Privacy and Security&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/eweek_retail/~3/_52FtLCaaj0/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ein M&#228;dchen erinnert sich an die Shoah</title>
    <link href="http://buecher.hagalil.com/2009/10/ornstein/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-10-20:/commentary/6479185</id>
    <updated>2009-10-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>haGalil onLine</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(S. 139) Und: &#8222;Meine Kinder und die Kinder meiner Freunde haben mir erz&#228;hlt, dass es die besondere Eigenschaft ihrer Eltern als &#220;berlebender war, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://buecher.hagalil.com/2009/10/ornstein/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New Data Breach, Privacy Bills in Congress</title>
    <link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InternetnewscomSecurityNews/~3/3svZfZApyiU/3795191" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-01-08:/commentary/3971261</id>
    <updated>2009-01-08T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Internet.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...stories on this topic:     Paul Davie, founder and chief operating officer at database security vendor Secerno, thinks Bill S.139 is not stringent enough. &quot;The 10,000 number is completely arbitrary,&quot; he told InternetNews.com by e-mail. &quot;The threat of in&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InternetnewscomSecurityNews/~3/3svZfZApyiU/3795191&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

