<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : News Articles for S.1490 Personal Data Privacy and Security Act of 2009</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s1490/atom_news" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s1490/news" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2010-01-03T19:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/news/59273</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress Works to Revamp Privacy Laws</title>
    <link href="http://www.complianceweek.com/article/5736/congress-works-to-revamp-privacy-laws" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-01-03:/commentary/7314190</id>
    <updated>2010-01-03T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Compliance Week (subscription)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Dianne Feinstein; and S. 1490, the Personal Data Privacy and Security Act, introduced by Sen. Patrick Leahy. Feinstein&amp;#39;s bill would require breach ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.complianceweek.com/article/5736/congress-works-to-revamp-privacy-laws&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>White House cyber czar and other security non-events of &amp;#39;09</title>
    <link href="http://news.idg.no/cw/art.cfm?id=A38970B8-1A64-67EA-E4EE3232C6A2C954" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-17:/commentary/6978257</id>
    <updated>2009-12-17T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IDG</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 But with theSenate version of the bill (Personal Data Privacy and Security Act of 2009--S.1490) still only waiting to be considered by the full Senate, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.idg.no/cw/art.cfm?id=A38970B8-1A64-67EA-E4EE3232C6A2C954&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>My Turn: Cheers (and caution!), Sen. Leahy</title>
    <link href="http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20091218/OPINION02/912180302/My-Turn-Cheers-and-caution-Sen.-Leahy" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-17:/commentary/6978255</id>
    <updated>2009-12-17T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BurlingtonFreePress.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Leahy, your fidelity to the Constitution is far from absolute even though you always and loudly state otherwise, but you should be commended for S.1490, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20091218/OPINION02/912180302/My-Turn-Cheers-and-caution-Sen.-Leahy&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>My Turn: Cheers (and caution!), Sen. Leahy</title>
    <link href="http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20091218/OPINION02/912180302/1006/RSS06" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-17:/commentary/6968338</id>
    <updated>2009-12-17T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Burlington Free Press</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...and your constituents. After all, you have been in D.C. for a long time. Can you take the Vermont out of the boy? Anyway, S.1490 is a fine piece of legislation that is long overdue, but one aspect of the legislation is somewhat disturbing, and that is t&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20091218/OPINION02/912180302/1006/RSS06&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Federal data breach notification law passes in US House</title>
    <link href="http://searchcompliance.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid195_gci1376407,00.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-09:/commentary/6978256</id>
    <updated>2009-12-09T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>SearchSecurity.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Personal Data Privacy and Security Act (S. 1490), introduced by Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, cleared the Senate Judiciary Committee but has never come ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://searchcompliance.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid195_gci1376407,00.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BSA Commends Senate Judiciary Committee on Passage Data Breach Legislation</title>
    <link href="http://www.ag-ip-news.com/GetArticle.asp?Art_ID=7768" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-11-08:/commentary/6676635</id>
    <updated>2009-11-08T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ag-IP-news Agency</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...Committee on the passage of two bills that will increase cyber security and protect consumers online. The Committee voted on S.1490, the Personal Data Privacy and Security Act of 2009, and S.139, the Data Breach Notification Act. BSA commends Chairman L&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ag-ip-news.com/GetArticle.asp?Art_ID=7768&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A shield deferred, once again</title>
    <link href="http://www.rbr.com/media-news/washington-beat/18313.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-11-04:/commentary/6613787</id>
    <updated>2009-11-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Radio Business Report</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The committee passed three other bills, S.1490, Personal Data Privacy and Security Act of 2009; S.139, Data Breach Notification Act; and S. 1472, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rbr.com/media-news/washington-beat/18313.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.govinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=1915" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-11-04:/commentary/6613786</id>
    <updated>2009-11-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Computerworld</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The committee approved the Personal Data Privacy and Security Act of 2009 (S.1490) by a vote of 15-5. The bill is now headed to the full Senate for ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=1915&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Committee Passes Data Breach Laws</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/eweek_retail/~3/_52FtLCaaj0/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-11-04:/commentary/6591337</id>
    <updated>2009-11-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>eWeek</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...way out of the Senate Judiciary Committee today. &#160;The committee voted yes on the Personal Data Privacy and Security Act of 2009 (S.1490) and the Data Breach Notification Act (S.139). The vote means the bills are now headed to the full Senate for its st&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/eweek_retail/~3/_52FtLCaaj0/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Federal data protection law inches forward</title>
    <link href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140408/Federal_data_protection_law_inches_forward?source=rss_news" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-11-04:/commentary/6591336</id>
    <updated>2009-11-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ComputerWorld</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...good thing, mostly to stop the growth of individual state laws with differing requirements,&quot; he said. But the provisions in S.1490 which would require breached entities to report to the government &quot;will create an entire new set of bureaucracy within the&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140408/Federal_data_protection_law_inches_forward?source=rss_news&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate poised to pass national breach-notification law -- or maybe not</title>
    <link href="http://gcn.com/articles/2009/11/02/cybereye-national-notification-law.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-11-01:/commentary/6564398</id>
    <updated>2009-11-01T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>GCN.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 She is talking about S.1490, the Personal Data Privacy and Security Act of 2009, introduced by Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) in July and now being ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gcn.com/articles/2009/11/02/cybereye-national-notification-law.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Leahy&amp;#39;s Bill Would Set Single Federal Standard for Data Breach Notification</title>
    <link href="http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/leahys-bill-would-set-single-federal-standard-for-data-breach-notification/?cs=36650" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-10-12:/commentary/6479182</id>
    <updated>2009-10-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IT Business Edge</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., introduced the Personal Data Privacy and Security Act, S. 1490, once again. Previous iterations of the bill have been before the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/leahys-bill-would-set-single-federal-standard-for-data-breach-notification/?cs=36650&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

